Cook Middle School Balanced Scorecard Indicators

Similar documents
Cook Primary School Balanced Scorecard Indicators

STUDENT WELFARE WELLNESS AND HEALTH SERVICES

School Wellness Policy Elements. Bremen City Schools School Nutrition Program Excellence in all we do!

STUDENT WELFARE WELLNESS AND HEALTH SERVICES

ADOPTED: 7/17/2018 REVISED: SCHOOL WELLNESS

PROCEDURES: To ensure the health and well-being of all students, the Board establishes that the agency shall provide to students:

VICTORIA REGIONAL JUVENILE JUSTICE CENTER

CHAPEL HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL. Chapel Hill Primary School P&C Tuckshop Convenor. Parents and Citizens Association

DIOCESE OF DES MOINES Catholic Schools Policies/Regulations adopted by Dowling Catholic High School

Cleburne ISD Wellness Plan

SCHOOL WELLNESS POLICY

WELLNESS POLICY. The Village for Families & Children Revised 11/10/2016 Page 1 of 7

SANGER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Students WELLNESS

Diocese of Harrisburg: School Wellness Policy Department of Catholic Schools Adopted: June 28, 2017 Revised: 1. Purpose

LOCAL SCHOOL WELLNESS POLICY FILE: IHAM. Health Education and Setting Nutrition Education Goals

1. The health education curriculum will include comprehensive sequential nutrition education which will promote the following:

Goals for Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Other Wellness Activities

N E I S D. School Health Index Summary Report

POLICY FAMILY HEALTH AND SAFETY OF STUDENTS 649

Students BP Student Wellness

ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Wellness Policy

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LANCASTER

Nutrition Education, Physical Education, Foods and Beverages and other Wellness Activities

JOB DESCRIPTION PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION. DIRECTORS AND MANAGERS 1692b DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION, HEALTH, ATHLETICS AND NURSING Page 1 of 10

NEW DIANA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT WELLNESS PLAN

STUDENT WELLNESS BP 5030

Health Services Manager

PINE REST CHRISTIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES COMMUNITY AND RESIDENTIAL SERVICES CENTER FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTIAL SERVICES. Wellness Policy APPROVAL:

Students STUDENT WELLNESS

21 st Century Charter School at Gary Policy ID School Wellness Policy Policy # July 5, 2006 WELLNESS POLICY

KIDSPEACE POLICY Copyright, KidsPeace Corporation

School Wellness Policy. Physical Activity and Nutrition

Kern Health Systems Offers A New School Wellness Grant Program!

GRANT PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

Census16 - Your Voice

The Council membership will represent all school levels (elementary and secondary schools) and

COAL CITY COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

SHELL KNOB SCHOOL 2017 DISTRICT WELLNESS PROGRAM

LYNNFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS WELLNESS POLICY

The Children s Home of Reading

Life Threatening Allergies Natick Public Schools

(Administration of Urgently Required Medication/Treatment)

WELLNESS POLICY BOARD ADOPTED: May 2, 2006

Award Title. NYU's Health Center Without Walls. Awards Categories. Student Health, Wellness, Counseling, and related.

MEMO SD33 Innovation Grant

Wellness Policy Assessment SY 14-15

TL9- The Various Methods by Which Direct Care Nurses Access Nurse Leaders

Watkins Glen School District Plan for Student with Peanut Allergy in the School

WHOLE SCHOOL FOOD POLICY INCLUDING FOOD SAFETY

Sustainable Jersey for Schools Health and Wellness Small Grants Program

HEALTHY CHILDREN ARE PREPARED TO LEARN. PK-6 th

PEP GRANT 101. Roundtable Discussion (writing, receiving and implementing)

Health Promotion Test Questions

1. Title: Health and Safety Policy

Skill 2: Client will identify triggers that have the greatest impact on his or her medical regimen

HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT

COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP & COMMUNICATION

NUTRITION AND DIETARY REQUIREMENTS POLICY

FCPS Wellness Policy and Regulations

Dear Potential Applicant,

HED - Public Health in Community Health Education Graduate Program

Newtownhamilton Primary School

ALTERNATIVE REHABILITATION COMMUNITIES, INC.

Campus life is more vibrant when. [n = 170] Comprehensive Listing Raw Data

NON-TRAVEL MEAL AND LIGHT REFRESHMENT CONSUMPTION

Procedure No. 3420P Anaphylaxis Prevention and Response Controlling the Exposure to Allergens

Time Event Description Location. Friday, August 17, 2018: *** Please have your packets with you at all times

Wellness Goal Nutrition Messages

2014 Cambridge English Language Assessment awards for preparation centre FAQ

The Homestay Host Experience

KNIGHT S.H.I.F.T. SCHOOLS HELPING IN FAMILY TRANSITION

Indiana Healthy Schools Action Plan St. Anthony of Padua Clarksville, Indiana

The VIKING VOICE. hfhighschool.org instagram.com/hfhs59 twitter.com/hfhs59

School Nutrition Programs

Chinese HomeCare Specialists

Campus Middle School General Information School Year

Using the CDC School Health Index to Promote Healthy School Environments for Staff

OVERVIEW OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NON-REGULATORY GUIDANCE: STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENTS GRANTS TITLE IV, PART A NATIONAL TITLE

Grant Opportunities. Applications are due July 19, To request an application go to

Building Local Partnerships & Sustainability. Additional Resources

NUTRITION AND HYDRATION WEEK

Introduction to Day Hospital

Proposition 1: Educational Programs and Operations Levy. Updated

Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Services, Inc.

HAMILTON COUNTY SCHOOLS U.S. NAVY JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (NJROTC) NAVAL SCIENCE PROGRAM

MILKROUND S EVENTS CALENDAR JULY 2016 JUNE 2017

Overarching Themes Enrollment Management

EASTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICIES SECTION C GENERAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION

School wellness policy development, implementation and evaluation

Toby Lodge. Venus Healthcare Homes Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

2017 Billinghurst Middle School Orchestra & Band Festival Tour. Information Packet

STUDENT DATA SHEET. Student s Legal Last Name Legal First Name Middle Name Preferred Name. Student s Residence Street Address City State Zip Code

DRAFT Goals (A, B, C...), Best Practices (1, 2, 3...), and Indicators (a, b, c...)

Orientation to School Nutrition Management

Employee Climate Survey

Homewood-Flossmoor Community High School. A newsletter for School District 233 families

STEM Academy Project Based Learning

CHAPTER I--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

Links to Learning Grant Application Assistance League of Minneapolis /St. Paul

Transcription:

Cook Middle School Balanced Scorecard Indicators I. Area of Focus Continuous evaluation and progress in measured student achievement Objective Measure/Indicator Grade(s) Subject 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 A. Students will perform on or above grade level in Reading at level 2 and 3 2014 Performance Targets 6 Reading 93% 93% 92% 94.6% 7 Reading 91% 92% 93% 94.6% 8 Reading 96%** 96%** 95% 94.6% B. Students will perform on or above grade level in Math at level 3 at level 2 and 3 at level 3 6 Reading 30% 31% 35% 7 Reading 15% 35% 25% 8 Reading 34% 31% 42% 6 Math 67% 70% 71% 88.1% 7 Math 78% 86% 79% 88.1% 8 Math 73%** 87%** 82% 88.1% 6 Math 11% 13% 11% 7 Math 9% 22% 15% 8 Math 17% 11% 19% ** Adjusted percentages upon Summer CRCT Retests 1

I. Area of Focus Continuous evaluation and progress in measured student achievement Objective Measure/Indicator Grade(s) Subject 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 C. Students will perform on or above grade level in English Language Arts at levels 2 and 3 2014 Performance Targets 6 ELA 88% 90% 90% 93% 7 ELA 92% 91% 91% 93% 8 ELA 96% 95% 95% 93% D. Students will perform on or above grade level in Science at level 3 at levels 2 and 3 at level 3 6 ELA 29% 25% 23% 7 ELA 38% 47% 39% 8 ELA 34% 33% 47% 6 Science 73% 68% 71% 82.3% 7 Science 76% 83% 76% 82.3% 8 Science 64% 70% 69% 82.3% 6 Science 13% 21% 20% 7 Science 28% 32% 33% 8 Science 19% 15% 15% 2

Objective Measure/Indicator Grade(s) Subject 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 E. Students will perform on or above grade level in Social Studies F. Students will perform on or above grade level in Writing at levels 2 and 3 at level 3 Grade 8 - Writing Assessment: % of students at Performance Level 2 and 3 - Meets and Exceeds Grade 8 Writing Assessment: % of students at Performance Level 3 - Exceeds 6 7 8 6 7 8 2014 Performance Targets Social Studies 75% 75% 70% 81.3% Social Studies 70% 75% 71% 81.3% Social Studies 67% 59% 71% 81.3% Social Studies 24% 30% 21% Social Studies 32% 40% 31% Social Studies 17% 10% 24% 8 Writing 70% 80% 74% 8 Writing 2% 3% 2.2% 3

II. Area of Focus Measures of community support of school. (Survey results are rounded to the nearest % and thus may not total 100%) A. Parent support will be indicated through the results of an annual perception survey. My child s school has a clear focus on academic learning and success for each student. My child is challenged to reach his/her potential. Teachers at Cook Middle have high expectations for my child s performance My child learns good work habits and respect for self and others at Cook Middle. School personnel treat my child in a fair and consistent manner. The faculty and staff are responsive to my concerns. Cook Middle keeps me informed of my child s progress through phone calls, notes, report cards, agendas, newsletters, test scores, conferences, etc. YEAR Number of 2010-2011 130 50% 46% 4% 0 2011-2012 64 44% 48% 5% 3% 2012-2013 346 92% 6% 2% 2010-2011 130 45% 47% 6% 2% 2011-2012 65 38% 54% 6% 2% 2012-2013 348 89% 9% 3% 2010-2011 131 44% 50% 5% 1% 2011-2012 65 38% 49% 6% 6% 2012-2013 346 84% 10% 6% 2010-2011 130 44% 47% 6% 2% 2011-2012 65 42% 46% 6% 6% 2012-2013 346 86% 7% 7% 2010-2011 140 44% 42% 11% 3% 2011-2012 65 38% 49% 8% 5% 2012-2013 345 79% 12% 8% 2010-2011 130 42% 38% 15% 5% 2011-2012 65 38% 49% 9% 3% 2012-2013 345 79% 14% 8% 2010-2011 131 51% 41% 6% 2% 2011-2012 66 42% 45% 6% 6% 2012-2013 344 81% 15% 4% 4

A. Parent support will be indicated through the results of an annual perception survey. Parent and community volunteers are encouraged and appreciated at Cook Middle. Cook Middle provides high quality programs for gifted students. Cook Middle provides high quality programs for special needs students. YEAR Number of 2010-2011 140 46% 41% 10% 3% 2011-2012 65 38% 54% 6% 2% 2012-2013 343 78% 11% 11% 2010-2011 130 38% 32% 16% 14% 2011-2012 66 36% 53% 6% 5% 2012-2013 345 85% 10% 5% 2010-2011 130 48% 26% 24% 2% 2011-2012 65 45% 48% 3% 5% 2012-2013 342 73% 8% 19% III. Area of Focus Internal Climate Measures A. Employee support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). Teachers engage in process of collaborative planning for curriculum implementation to ensure that they agree on core content and required student performance. YEAR Number of 2010-2011 83 19% 78% 2% 0 2011-2012 59 14% 81% 5% 0 2012-2013 73 85% 1% 14% Teachers and administrators use a systematic process for monitoring and evaluating implementation of the curriculum A comprehensive system is in place to ensure that all administrators and instructional personnel use assessment data to design and adjust instruction to maximize student achievement. High expectations for all learners are consistently evident. 2010-2011 83 18% 80% 2% 0 2011-2012 56 14% 77% 9% 0 2012-2013 72 82% 3% 15% 2010-2011 83 19% 75% 6% 0 2011-2012 58 14% 76% 10% 0 2012-2013 72 72% 8% 19% 2010-2011 83 23% 70% 7% 0 2011-2012 58 19% 71% 7% 3% 2012-2013 72 85% 1% 14% 5

A. Employee support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). The school vision and mission are the basis for all aspects of continuous improvement All staff work collaboratively to ensure that rules, policies, and procedures related to sustaining a safe and productive learning environment are clearly communicated and implemented throughout the school. The school as a community of learning involves parents and community members as active participants. The principal and school administrators provide leadership that reinforces a commitment to high expectations for student achievement. School governance and leadership are shared and school improvement is viewed as a collective responsibility. The school leadership team is operational, representative and data driven. The principal and school administrators support the learning environment through strong management and organizational skills. YEAR Number of 2010-2011 82 21% 76% 4% 0 2011-2012 57 16% 75% 9% 0 2012-2013 72 86% 3% 11% 2010-2011 82 11% 71% 18% 0 2011-2012 56 16% 68% 12% 4% 2012-2013 73 82% 5% 12% 2010-2011 82 12% 72% 16% 0 2011-2012 55 9% 73% 16% 2% 2012-2013 71 75% 11% 14% 2010-2011 83 19% 75% 6% 0 2011-2012 58 16% 74% 10% 0 2012-2013 73 84% 4% 12% 2010-2011 82 16% 73% 11% 0 2011-2012 58 16% 71% 14% 0 2012-2013 73 81% 5% 14% 2010-2011 82 20% 79% 1% 0 2011-2012 58 17% 76% 5% 2% 2012-2013 73 82% 0 18% 2010-2011 83 22% 71% 7% 0 2011-2012 58 14% 71% 16% 0 2012-2013 73 81% 7% 12% The principal and school administrators clearly set high expectations for both students and staff. The principal and school administrators guide the process of decision-making and problem solving in such a way that all staff members have the opportunity to provide input. 2010-2011 82 21% 66% 13% 0 2011-2012 58 16% 72% 10% 2% 2012-2013 72 85% 4% 11% 2010-2011 83 19% 70% 11% 0 2011-2012 57 16% 61% 19% 4% 2012-2013 73 73% 12% 15% 6

A. Employee support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). YEAR Number of The principal and school administrators have 2010-2011 82 21% 72% 7% 0 quality contacts and interactions with staff 2011-2012 58 14% 76% 9% 2% and students and are visible at most school events. 2012-2013 73 85% 1% 14% The principal and school administrators establish a clear set of standard operating procedures for faculty and staff. The principal and school administrators promote a sense of community and cooperation, a positive climate and a shared vision that drives the work of the school. Our school celebrates and acknowledges achievements and accomplishments. 2010-2011 83 14% 78% 7% 0 2011-2012 58 16% 66% 16% 3% 2012-2013 72 83% 4% 12% 2010-2011 82 20% 73% 6% 1% 2011-2012 58 10% 69% 14% 7% 2012-2013 70 77% 7% 16% 2010-2011 83 24% 73% 2% 0 2011-2012 58 16% 76% 9% 0 2012-2013 73 89% 1% 10% Our school fosters inclusion and diversity. 2010-2011 83 23% 76% 1% 0 2011-2012 58 14% 81% 5% 0 2012-2013 73 88% 3% 10% Our school culture supports professional growth of faculty and staff Our school culture supports the growth and development of all learners. Programs for special needs students are of high quality. Guidance and counseling services meet identified student needs. The media program at my school supports the learning needs of the students and staff. 2010-2011 83 20% 73% 6% 0 2011-2012 57 12% 75% 12% 0 2012-2013 73 75% 11% 14% 2010-2011 83 18% 80% 2% 0 2011-2012 58 14% 76% 9% 2% 2012-2013 73 89% 3% 8% 2010-2011 81 23% 70% 6% 0 2011-2012 58 19% 71% 9% 2% 2012-2013 73 79% 4% 16% 2010-2011 82 10% 74% 12% 4% 2011-2012 58 12% 64% 10% 14% 2012-2013 73 68% 14% 18% 2010-2011 82 11% 78% 10% 1% 2011-2012 58 21% 71% 5% 3% 2012-2013 72 82% 3% 15% 7

III. Area of Focus Internal Climate Measures A. Student support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). YEAR Number of I believe learning is very important at my school. 2010-2011 128 59% 40% 1% 1% 2011-2012 94 52% 39% 4% 4% 2012-2013 213 94% 5% 1% My teachers have high expectations for students. My teachers exhibit passion for learning, enthusiasm and inspire me and my classmates to succeed. My teachers use a variety of methods (hands-on activities, graphic organizers, technology, etc.) to make my subjects easier. I feel comfortable sharing my ideas with teachers and other adults at this school. 2010-2011 128 49% 45% 5% 1% 2011-2012 94 51% 46% 3% 0 2012-2013 212 91% 8% 1% 2010-2011 128 34% 59% 5% 1% 2011-2012 94 34% 52% 14% 0 2012-2013 212 86% 12% 1% 2010-2011 128 38% 49% 11% 2% 2011-2012 93 42% 43% 12% 3% 2012-2013 212 88% 12% 0 2010-2011 127 23% 54% 19% 4% 2011-2012 92 29% 48% 18% 4% 2012-2013 211 74% 25% 1% I am treated with respect by adults at my school. 2010-2011 127 31% 51% 15% 2% 2011-2012 91 40% 44% 11% 5% 2012-2013 211 75% 22% 3% Students are recognized and rewarded for success and good behavior at this school. School rules/policies are clear, fair, and enforced consistently. 2010-2011 128 27% 50% 20% 4% 2011-2012 93 34% 44% 17% 4% 2012-2013 211 74% 24% 2% 2010-2011 127 28% 51% 17% 5% 2011-2012 92 29% 48% 14% 9% 2012-2013 211 76% 23% 1% 8

A. Student support and satisfaction will be indicated by the results of annual staff perception survey(s). YEAR Number of I feel safe and secure in my school. 2010-2011 128 29% 49% 12% 9% 2011-2012 93 26% 53% 14% 8% 2012-2013 211 79% 21% 0 The Media Center supports my learning needs. 2010-2011 128 29% 59% 10% 2% 2011-2012 94 39% 41% 14% 5% 2012-2013 211 82% 17% 1% The guidance and counseling program at my school meets my needs. The school provides numerous opportunities for me to be involved in extra-curricular activities. I have heard or seen the vision, mission, and beliefs in my school. There is a significant problem with substance abuse (drug and/or alcohol problems) among the students at my school. 2010-2011 128 28% 55% 14% 2% 2011-2012 94 23% 59% 13% 5% 2012-2013 211 77% 15% 8% 2010-2011 127 35% 51% 10% 3% 2011-2012 93 40% 47% 11% 2% 2012-2013 211 85% 12% 3% 2010-2011 128 23% 61% 12% 4% 2011-2012 93 25% 54% 14% 8% 2012-2013 210 78% 19% 3% 2010-2011 128 24% 41% 21% 13% 2011-2012 93 25% 27% 41% 8% 2012-2013 211 50% 45% 5% 9

IV. Area of Focus Measures of a safe and orderly environment A. Attendance Data Employees Year Average Sick Leave Days 2010-2011 8.71 2011-2012 11.75 2012-2013 11.52 Students Year Average Daily Attendance 2010-2011 95.98% 2011-2012 96.29% 2012-2013 95.77% B. Facilities and Services Food Nutrition Program will be effective as indicated by the results of annual perception surveys. My child likes the food served in the lunchroom. (Parent) There needs to be more food choices for my child in the lunchroom. (Parent) My child has enough time to each lunch. (Parent) The meals that are prepared to the USDA guidelines are suitable to the needs of the students and adults. (Staff) YEAR Number of 2010-2011 130 49% 30% 19% 2% 2011-2012 65 45% 46% 3% 6% 2012-2013 347 20% 63% 17% 2010-2011 130 43% 29% 17% 11% 2011-2012 67 40% 49% 4% 6% 2012-2013 346 82% 12% 6% 2010-2011 140 49% 39% 10% 2% 2011-2012 67 37% 52% 6% 4% 2012-2013 345 48% 40% 12% 2010-2011 83 7% 70% 16% 7% 2011-2012 57 4% 61% 18% 18% 2012-2013 72 43% 33% 24% 10

B. Facilities and Services Food Nutrition Program will be effective as indicated by the results of annual perception surveys. I get an adequate meal for the money I pay. (Staff) I would agree to pay more for a larger meal. (Staff) I agree with the reduction of fat, salt and sugar in the meals. (Staff) I would encourage students and parents to participate in the lunchroom program more. (Staff) YEAR Number of 2010-2011 83 13% 60% 18% 8% 2011-2012 56 5% 66% 14% 14% 2012-2013 73 58% 23% 19% 2010-2011 82 6% 54% 30% 10% 2011-2012 58 3% 45% 34% 17% 2012-2013 73 30% 51% 19% 2010-2011 83 22% 65% 10% 4% 2011-2012 58 16% 66% 12% 7% 2012-2013 73 38% 44% 18% 2010-2011 83 14% 64% 14% 7% 2011-2012 58 10% 66% 12% 12% 2012-2013 73 51% 30% 19% I like the lunchroom food. (Student) 2010-2011 128 12% 27% 26% 36% 2011-2012 94 2% 21% 31% 46% 2012-2013 211 14% 83% 2% I would like more food choices in the lunchroom. (Student) The lunchroom employees are friendly. (Student) When I eat in the lunchroom, I have enough time to eat my meal. (Student) The atmosphere in the lunchroom is conducive to an enjoyable meal. (Student) 2010-2011 128 77% 13% 7% 3% 2011-2012 94 83% 14% 0 3% 2012-2013 211 95% 5% 0 2010-2011 128 34% 49% 9% 9% 2011-2012 94 28% 46% 15% 12% 2012-2013 211 75% 22% 3% 2010-2011 128 16% 38% 25% 21% 2011-2012 93 13% 43% 26% 18% 2012-2013 211 45% 54% 1% 2010-2011 128 19% 34% 27% 20% 2011-2012 92 11% 46% 24% 20% 2012-2013 211 48% 50% 2% 11

A. Facilities and Services Technology will be available and used effectively as indicated by the results of annual perception surveys. Technology tools are available in my school. (Staff) I can effectively use the technology tools available to me. (Staff) Adequate software is available in my school. (Staff) I can effectively use the software available to me. (Staff) Requests made to the technology specialist in my school are answered in a timely manner. (Staff) My child has opportunities to use technology for learning at Cook Middle School. (Parent) My teachers provide me with opportunities to use technology for learning. (Student) YEAR Number of 2010-2011 82 45% 55% 0 0 2011-2012 58 31% 69% 0 0 2012-2013 73 89% 1% 10% 2010-2011 82 39% 59% 2% 0 2011-2012 58 24% 74% 2% 0 2012-2013 73 89% 3% 8% 2010-2011 81 37% 59% 4% 0 2011-2012 58 26% 72% 2% 0 2012-2013 73 88% 1% 11% 2010-2011 82 33% 67% 0 0 2011-2012 58 19% 81% 0 0 2012-2013 73 86% 3% 11% 2010-2011 81 47% 52% 1% 0 2011-2012 56 50% 48% 2% 0 2012-2013 72 88% 0 12% 2010-2011 130 53% 40% 6% 1% 2011-2012 67 43% 45% 6% 4% 2012-2013 346 86% 6% 8% 2010-2011 126 39% 54% 6% 1% 2011-2012 88 38% 50% 10% 2% 2012-2013 207 93% 6% 1% B. Facilities and Services Students and Staff will be provided a safe and secure environment. YEAR Number of Cook Middle is safe and secure. (Parent) 2010-2011 130 55% 37% 7% 1% 2011-2012 66 36% 53% 8% 3% 2012-2013 341 70% 5% 26% B. Facilities and Services 12

Maintenance is effective. Cook Middle is clean well maintained and attractive. (Parent) Playground and PE areas are safe and well maintained. (Parent) Athletic facilities are safe and attractive. (Parent) My room/area and the school are clean and well maintained. (Staff) Playground and PE areas are safe and well maintained. (Staff) Athletic facilities in Cook County are safe and attractive. (Staff) My school is clean and well maintained. (Student) Playground and PE areas are safe and well maintained. (Student) Athletic facilities are safe and attractive. (Student) YEAR Number of 2010-2011 130 53% 42% 4% 1% 2011-2012 71 38% 49% 6% 7% 2012-2013 344 68% 24% 8% 2010-2011 130 50% 32% 15% 3% 2011-2012 68 43% 49% 3% 6% 2012-2013 342 79% 11% 11% 2010-2011 130 55% 29% 15% 1% 2011-2012 69 39% 51% 7% 3% 2012-2013 343 80% 10% 9% 2010-2011 83 27% 67% 6% 0 2011-2012 56 18% 59% 18% 5% 2012-2013 70 66% 9% 26% 2010-2011 83 22% 72% 6% 0 2011-2012 57 14% 82% 4% 0 2012-2013 70 67% 1% 31% 2010-2011 83 25% 70% 4% 1% 2011-2012 57 18% 79% 2% 2% 2012-2013 70 71% 3% 26% 2010-2011 128 20% 49% 17% 14% 2011-2012 94 20% 48% 23% 9% 2012-2013 210 52% 45% 3% 2010-2011 128 28% 52% 15% 5% 2011-2012 94 36% 46% 10% 9% 2012-2013 208 79% 20% 0 2010-2011 128 34% 56% 5% 5% 2011-2012 94 31% 50% 13% 6% 2012-2013 208 77% 18% 5% B. Facilities and Services 13

Transportation is effective, safe and secure. I believe my child has a safe and secure bus ride. (Parent) Bus rules are clear and consistently enforced. (Parent) Buses are clean and well maintained. (Parent) Bus drivers treat students fairly and with respect. (Parent) Bus rules are clear and consistently enforced. (Staff) Buses are clean and well maintained. (Staff) YEAR Number of 2010-2011 109 48% 36% 10% 6% 2011-2012 66 35% 53% 8% 5% 2012-2013 337 62% 23% 16% 2010-2011 130 52% 33% 14% 14% 2011-2012 66 38% 52% 3% 8% 2012-2013 337 61% 22% 17% 2010-2011 130 52% 37% 11% 1% 2011-2012 65 40% 48% 6% 6% 2012-2013 337 49% 30% 21% 2010-2011 130 52% 41% 6% 1% 2011-2012 66 42% 47% 6% 5% 2012-2013 338 53% 26% 21% 2010-2011 82 7% 73% 15% 5% 2011-2012 58 7% 78% 12% 3% 2012-2013 73 22% 10% 68% 2010-2011 82 7% 83% 4% 6% 2011-2012 58 3% 86% 5% 5% 2012-2013 73 22% 7% 71% 14

B. Facilities and Services Transportation is effective, safe and secure. Bus drivers treat students fairly and with respect. (Staff) I feel safe and secure when riding a school bus. (Student) Bus rules are clear and consistently enforced. (Student) Buses are clean and well maintained. (Students) Bus drivers treat students fairly and with respect. (Student) YEAR Number of 2010-2011 82 9% 74% 13% 4% 2011-2012 56 5% 80% 11% 4% 2012-2013 73 18% 7% 75% 2010-2011 119 16% 42% 24% 18% 2011-2012 94 13% 38% 19% 30% 2012-2013 211 55% 33% 13% 2010-2011 119 17% 39% 29% 15% 2011-2012 94 11% 48% 14% 28% 2012-2013 211 55% 30% 14% 2010-2011 119 12% 33% 30% 25% 2011-2012 94 5% 30% 30% 35% 2012-2013 210 38% 49% 13% 2010-2011 119 18% 45% 17% 20% 2011-2012 93 9% 37% 22% 33% 2012-2013 211 49% 36% 15% 15