Process for identification and evaluation of new POPs under the Stockholm Convention

Similar documents
2 June in annex I to. the meeting. summary of. Convention. conferences. individual letters. Yours sincerely, Rolph Payet.

Second Workshop for the Stockholm Convention regional and subregional centres 28 September - 2 October 2009 AGENDA

PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT LINKAGE TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES, ACTION PLANS AND PROGRAMS

REACH Evaluation. Graham Lloyd Regulatory/Technical. REACH in Practice Conference 1 June, Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Regulatory Compliance Ltd

Update of the Work plan on international activities 2012

OECD Webinar on alternatives to long chain PFCs Co-organized with the Stockholm Convention Secretariat 18 April 2011

United Nations Environment Programme

IFCS Indicators of Progress. Priorities for Action beyond 2000 and Forum Recommendations

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Safety of the food chain Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides

ECHA and the implementation of REACH,CLP and other tasks

February Report of the GEF to the FIFTH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE AUTHORISING OFFICER FOR THE YEAR 2014

Guidance on Scientific Research and Development (SR&D) and Product and Process Orientated Research and Development (PPORD)

WARTBURG COLLEGE ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY PROGRAM. Hazardous Chemical Communication Plan (Worker Right To Know)

TERMS OF REFERENCE CONSULTANCY TO CONDUCT A TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT ON HEALTHCARE WASTE MANAGMENT IN SELECTED HEALTH FACILITIES.

Guidance on the preparation of dossiers for harmonised classification and labelling (CLH) under Regulation (EC) No.

1. Address by Dr. Chris SAID, Parliamentary Secretary for Consumers, Fair Competition and Public Dialogue

CLP the implementation of GHS in the EU Facts and practical advice

IFCS CHAMPION. Children and Chemical Safety. Report on Activities. May 2006

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR REACH AND CLP INSPECTIONS 1

National Dialogue Initiative

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

NINTH WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (POPS) IN EAST ASIAN COUNTRIES. Chairperson s Summary

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

PART I: GENERAL APPROACH TO THE REVIEW. A. [Applicability

Basel Convention Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific (BCRC China) and Its Regional Delivery

9/10/2013. Contributions of ECHA to the achievement of the REACH goals. Content of Discussion

Questionnaire for the submission of information on exports, export notifications and on information exchange

REACH/CLP Update. Roseleen Murphy IMFI 12 th May 2011

COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE../ /EU. of

An introduction to Codex and basic principles of standards development (Code of Good Practice for standards development)

UNIDO and the Stockholm Convention

Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

1. Inception Workshop

PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AN AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR) PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT

Retired. assessing and communicating risks of environmental hazards to individuals, families and communities;

Intertek Health, Environmental & Regulatory Services

Terms of Reference. International Consultant GEF Project Development Specialist

LISAM SYSTEMS REACH Compliant SDSs: What s Changed and What s Coming

Implementation of REACH & CLP: common challenges of national authorities and ECHA

Hazard Communication. Hazard Communication

United Nations Environment Programme

Final Draft Agenda Sixteenth meeting of the Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement (Forum-16) October 2013

Measures to Strengthen International Co-operation in Nuclear, Radiation and Transport Safety and Waste Management

REACH-IT Industry User Manual

REACH Pre-registration Questions and Answers

Annex. IFCS Forum V Plenary Information/ Discussion Session on Tools and Approaches for Applying Precaution in the Context of Chemicals Safety

Guidance for applicants requesting scientific advice

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,

Adopted by Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee 20 February Adopted by Pharmacovigilance Inspectors Working Group 21 March 2014

CHALLENGES IN MANAGING CHEMICALS IN THE WORKPLACE THE PHILIPPINE EXPERIENCE

CHEMICALS (Classification, Labelling, Packaging of substances and mixtures -CLP) Screening Meeting EU Serbia June 2013

HIGH CONTRACTING PARTY: Republic of Lithuania NATIONAL POINT(S) OF CONTACT:

Proposal Review and Approval

Overview Schedule. SESSIONS OF THE SUBSIDIARY BODIES 1 11 June 2015, Bonn, Germany

Background to CLP. Presentation Overview. Why Introduce GHS? Basic CLP requirements 8/30/2011

Presented by: James Moose Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, LLP. With: Stephen L. Jenkins, AICP Michael Brandman Associates

CPNEWS[31] On February 9, 10 and 11, the CP/RAC held in its. Summary. 1. The CP/RAC plots the course for 2009

Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Procedure

Tel.: +1 (514) ext Ref.: AN 12/51-07/74 7 December 2007

Scientific Advice and Protocol Assistance at the EMEA

The GEF. Was established in October 1991 as a $1 billion pilot program in the World Bank

WRITTEN HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM. Prepared for: BORO OF

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF SHIPS' BALLAST WATER AND SEDIMENTS, 2004

Hazard Communication. OSHA Office of Training and Education 1

Progress of Expert Working Group on ESM (EWG)

Clinical Risk Management: Agile Development Implementation Guidance

COMMON GRANT APPLICATION AND REPORTING A GUIDE FOR GRANTMAKERS

1. Applications must contain the following information (Article 33 of Regulation)

Prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases

SGP. Small Grants Programme (GEF SGP) Global Environment Facility SOUTH AFRICA. implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

Economic and Social Council

Cleaning Services. Cleaning Services List

Hazardous Materials. At the direction of the coordinator, these trained employees will conduct all future inventories.

Australian/New Zealand Standard

Technology Bank for the Least Developed Countries

European Medicines Agency guidance for applicants seeking scientific advice and protocol assistance

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90 POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Profiles in CSP Insourcing: Tufts Medical Center

Oil Spill Preparedness Regional Initiative Caspian Sea Black Sea Central Eurasia

Hazmat Roles and Actions

Electric Mobility Europe Call 2016

CHABOT/LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

CERCLA Law on The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

Policy for Risk Assessment of Young Persons at Work

Nuclear Security Regime in Indonesia

Phase 1: Country Needs Assessment and Fund Allocation Recommendation

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT

USER GUIDE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND GEF PROJECT FINANCING

Laboratory Chemical Hygiene Plan Research Lab

EPA s Integrated Risk Information System Assessment Development Procedures

Biocidal product regulation the changes to come

Article 36 Cooperation

Work with us as evaluator or reviewer!

Provisional agenda (annotated)

CAIRNS SHIPPING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. East Trinity Development Project Plan. Next Steps. Terms of Reference for an assignment to produce an

Practical guide 7: How to notify substances in the Classification and Labelling Inventory

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE. for individual consultants and individual consultants assigned by consulting firms/institutions

Transcription:

Process for identification and evaluation of new POPs under the Stockholm Convention Katarina Magulova Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

Outline Background Mandate POPs review committee Process Step 1 submission review Step-2 risk profile Step-3 risk management evaluation Step-4 recommendation for listing Implications of listing 2

Identifying new POPs (Art. 8) Identifies most harmful substances through an agreed procedure and criteria Any Party may submit a proposal for listing chemicals POPs Review Committee to: (1) review submissions (2) develop risk profiles (3) risk management evaluations (4) make recommendations to the COP COP makes decisions, and the Convention is then amended accordingly 3

Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee - POPRC Subsidiary body of the Stockholm Convention that is mandated to assess proposal(s) by a Party for a chemical to be listed as a POP in Annex A, B, and/or C of the Convention (Article 19) 4 4

Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee - POPRC 31 members Government-designated experts from Parties appointed by the COP * Rotation of POPRC members POPRC expert roster *POPRC meetings are open to observers 5

Review process Step 1: Proposal Any Party may submit a proposal for listing a chemical in the Convention Hazard assessment showing POPs characteristics: environmental fate and behaviour; eco-toxicological effects Monitoring data suggesting presence of a substance far from exposure sources Party has to prepare a dossier containing Annex D information Assistance of other Party and / or the Secretariat is possible Deadline ~4 months before POPRC for practical reasons 6 6

Annex D information requirements and screening criteria Chemical identity Persistence (half life in water >2 mt; soil and sediment >6 mt ) or other evidence of sufficient persistency Bioaccumulation/bioconcentration factor in aquatic environment >5000 or log Kow>5; monitoring data Long range transport as shown by measured levels in areas remote from sources; monitoring data and evidence of transfer between media; as well as modelling information Adverse effects (evidence of adverse human & env. effect /data indicating the potential for damage to health/environment 7

Review process Step 2: Screening POPRC examines the proposal and decides whether screening criteria in Annex D are fulfilled For any proposal set aside, a Party may resubmit the proposal to the POPRC for reconsideration If the POPRC again sets the proposal aside the Party may challenge the decision and the COP shall consider the matter 8

Review process Step 3: Development of Risk Profile POPRC invites Parties and observers to submit information specified in Annex E Ad hoc working group of POPRC prepares Draft Risk Profile based on the information Based on the Risk profile, POPRC evaluates whether the chemical is likely to lead to significant adverse human health or environmental effects, such that global action is warranted * *Lack of full scientific certainty shall not prevent the proposal from proceeding 9

Annex E information requirements for the Risk Profile Sources Hazard assessments Environmental fate Monitoring data Exposure and bio-availability National and international risk Assessment of profiles, labeling evaluations information, hazard classification Status under international conventions HA for the endpoints of concern incl. consideration of toxicological interactions involving multiple chemicals Physical and chemical properties, persistence, LRT, environmental fate, degradation, transformation, bio-concentration 10

Review process Step 4: Development of Risk Management Evaluation POPRC invites Parties and observers to submit information specified in Annex F Ad hoc working group of POPRC prepares Draft Risk Management Evaluation based on the information * Based on the Risk profile and Risk Management Evaluation, POPRC recommends whether the chemical should be considered by the COP for listing and suggest possible control measures COP decides on listing the chemical and specifies its related control measures * Parties and observers are invited to provide comments 11

Addition of new POPs 12 + 9 + 1= 22 POPs Annex A (Elimination) Pesticides: Lindane, alpha-hch, beta-hch, chlordecone and endosulfan Industrial chemicals: hexabromobiphenyl, pentachlorobenzene, pentabde, octabde Annex B (Restriction) Industrial chemicals: PFOS, its salts and PFOS-F Annex C (Unintentional production) Unintentional by-products: Pentachlorobenzene 12

Adoption - Amendment of annexes Text of the proposed amendment shall be communicated to the Parties at least 6 months before the COP meeting (i.e. 22 October 2010 for COP5) Adoption: by consensus of the COP Entry into force: one year after adoption Article 21, 22 13

Opt-out and opt-in Opt-out (non-acceptance) Parties not accepting adoption should inform depositary within one year, withdrawal of non acceptance possible at any time Article 22 Opt-in (if declared upon ratification) A country upon becoming a Party can declare desire to have entry into force of any amendment only when it notifies the depositary of ratification of that amendment Article 25 14

Annexes to the Convention Annex A Elimination: Elimination of production and use of all intentionally produced POPs Annex B - Restriction: Restrict production and use in accordance with the provisions of that Annex Annex C - Unintentional Production: Continuing minimization and, where feasible, ultimate elimination of the total releases of chemicals. 15

Difference between listing in Annex A and B Annex A Elimination Specific exemptions Parties have to register 1 Exemptions for 5 years with possibility of extension 2 When all registrations have expired, no new registrations possible for a given exemption Annex B Restriction Specific exemptions Same as Annex A Acceptable purpose: Notes: 1 Except for PCBs and recycling of articles containing BDEs, available for all parties 2 Except for PCBs until 2025/2028, for BDEs until 2030. Parties have to register. No expiry unless COP decides Listing with specific exemptions and acceptable purpose possible 16

Necessary actions after listing Review and update the NIP Article 7 Consultation with national stakeholder Preparation of inventories Control measures Article 3, 4 Implement regulation Notify Secretariat to register specific exemption Action plan for unintentional POPs Article 5 Develop and implement an action plan Promote BAT and BEP to reduce release 17

Necessary actions after listing Stockpiles and wastes Article 6 Identify stockpiles of POPs and products, articles and wastes containing POPs Manage stockpiles in environmentally sound manner Reporting to the Secretariat Article 15 Measures it has taken to implement the convention Statistical data on production, import and export Include new chemical in the programme for effectiveness evaluation Article 16 Monitoring Provide information and data 18

For further information www.pops.int 19