Section IV. Findings

Similar documents
Section IV. Findings

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE

To the Board of Overseers of Harvard College:

Harvard University Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2015

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Carroll County, Maryland. REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT June 30, 2008

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT. Year Ended June 30, 2012

Single Audit Reporting Package

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2010

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2013

Government Auditing Standards Report

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District Of Oregon

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards

Navigating the New Uniform Grant Guidance. Jack Reagan, Audit Partner Grant Thornton LLP. Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT June 30, 2012

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2012

APPENDIX VII OTHER AUDIT ADVISORIES

Auditor General s Role in the Florida Single Audit Act August 12, 2016

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK SINGLE AUDIT DECEMBER 31, 2017

If you have any questions, please contact Todd Bouey of Financial Analysis and Reporting at (213)

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

2012 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement

Harvard University Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2009

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

AGENDA. Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance. What is a passthrough

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 13

CSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION Financial Statements and Supplementary Information

Agency for Health Care Administration Response to DFS Audit of Selected Agency Contracts and Grants Active 7/1/14 through 6/30/15

University Enterprises, Inc. Sacramento, California SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Federal Grant Guidance Compliance

Schedule of Expenditure

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA

CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION, INC. Single Audit Reports. For the Year Ended June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

Grant Award and Contract Accounting

Nonprofit Single Audit and Major Program Determination Worksheet

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Orlando

South Carolina State University

Circular A-133 Audits for Non-Profits Receiving Grants Preparing for Audits and Protecting Grant Eligibility Given Current Government Priorities

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports and Housing Financial Data Schedules. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards...14

APPENDIX N FEDERAL AUDIT CLAUSES

OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 9 f LOS ANGELES, CA. Office of Native American Programs, Washington, DC

FINANCE-315 7/1/2017 SUBRECIPIENT COMMITMENT FORM

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Texas Association of County Auditors

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND (a Component Unit of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations)

Schedule Summary Schedule of Prior Federal Audit Findings. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (New Orleans) D-103

OMB Circular A-133 Reporting Package. Saginaw Valley State University. Year ended June 30, 2009

COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA. Single Audit Report December 31, 2016

State Agencies, Independent Auditors, North Carolina Local Governments and Public Authorities, interested parties

This page intentionally left blank

May CGHSFOA Accounting Conference Cheyenne Mountain Resort Colorado Springs May 15, Neal Christensen, CPA, CGMA Neal

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Grant Guidance 2 CFR 200

Uniform Guidance Subpart D Administrative Requirements

Department of Commerce

Single Audit Report. State of North Carolina. For the Year Ended June 30, Office of the State Auditor Beth A. Wood, CPA State Auditor

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2009

Subgrantee Monitoring and Risk Assessment Principles. Leslie O Reilly, VOCA Program Specialist

Local Nonprofit Agency Risk Assessments

Georgia Institute of Technology/Georgia Tech Research Corporation A-133 Coordinated Audit Research and Development Cluster Summary Schedule of Prior

Pinal County Community College District (Central Arizona College)

Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of Orlando. Compliance

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO FEDERAL AWARDS REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SINGLE AUDIT ACT DECEMBER 31, 2016

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher

January 26, Mr. Robert Becker, Superintendent Dover Town Board of Education 100 Grace Street Dover, NJ Dear Mr.

The FY 2006 A-133 Coordinated Audit incorporated the work of two auditors as identified below:

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 400

Uniform Guidance Subpart D Administrative Requirements. Why This Session Is Needed. Lesson Overview & Module Objectives

COUNTY OF SHASTA SINGLE AUDIT REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017


Summary of the Office of Management and Budget s Uniform Guidance for Federal Grants and its Impact on Federal Education Programs

Kentucky Community And Technical College System

Implementing the OMB s Super Circular (aka UGG) Presented by: Anne Fritz, Finance Director, City of St. Petersburg, Florida

Outgoing Subaward Guide and F-A-Qs

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

Uniform Guidance Year Two of the Audit Requirements Now What? CACUBO

The Office of Innovation and Improvement s Oversight and Monitoring of the Charter Schools Program s Planning and Implementation Grants

FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS CAPITAL PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Transportation

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General. Audit Federal Programs - EPA Water Programs. August 5, 2015

Subrecipient Risk Assessment and Monitoring of Northeastern University Issued Subawards

Monitoring Your Adult Education Providers: Policy and Guidance for State Adult Education Directors

Subrecipient Profile Questionnaire

Delayed Federal Grant Closeout: Issues and Impact

SINGLE AUDIT SECTION

STATE OF ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. Compliance Examination. (In Accordance With the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133) June 30, 2011

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

ALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Transcription:

Section IV Findings

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs SECTION I SUMMARY OF AUDITOR S RESULTS Financial Statements Type of auditor s report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified? No Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are not considered to be material weakness(es)? None Reported Noncompliance material to the financial statements noted? No Federal Awards Internal control over major programs: Material weakness(es) identified? No Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are not considered to be material weakness(es)? None Reported Type of auditor s report issued on compliance for major programs: Any audit findings that are required to be reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133? Unqualified Yes Identification of major programs: Program Name Research and Development Cluster Student Financial Aid Cluster CFDA Number Various Various Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type B programs: $3,000,000 Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee? Yes 68

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs SECTION II FINANCIAL REPORTING FINDINGS None reported 69

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs SECTION III FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Finding 12-01: Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Reporting Not Performed Timely Sponsor Award Number: HR0011-11-2-0006, R03DE022521A, 1120890 Sponsoring Agency: Defense Advance Research Project Agency, National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation CFDA Number: 12.910, 93.121, 47.041 Caltech Award Number: DARPA.LRS2011, NIH.R03DE022521, NSF.SNM Condition In testing the Institute's reporting of subrecipients subject to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, we sampled seven files involving subawards of $2,900,000 out of a total population of subawards of $10,300,000. We noted that FFATA reporting was performed for all awards tested. However, for three of the seven subrecipients tested, we noted that FFATA reporting was performed 29 days after the deadline. Citation Transparency Act, implementing requirements in 2 CFR part 170 and the FAR. Criteria When utilizing subrecipients to perform certain tasks under receipt of federal awards, the Institute is responsible for reporting those subawards that are subject to Transparency Act requirements on a timely basis on USASpending.gov to ensure that information is made available to the public. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause Management did not have a mechanism to track all required subawards to ensure FFATA reporting was performed on a timely basis. Effect Failure to follow FFATA reporting for subawards does not allow for full transparency of how the Institute is using Federal funding. Recommendation We recommend that the Institute enhance the controls and processes for timely FFATA reporting. Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan Management s views and corrective action plan are included at the end of this report. 70

Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings and Questioned Costs There are no prior year audit findings that require an update in this audit report. 71

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, Califomia 91125 Office of the Associate Vice President for Research Administration Financial Services Administration Building, Mail Code 201-15 626-395-6073 June 26, 2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 350 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071-2889 Subject: California Institute of Technology Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan Reference: OMB Circular A-133 Audit for Fiscal Year 2012 Enclosed is the California Institute of Technology's OMB Circular A-133 Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan for fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. Please feel free to call me if any further information or clarification is required. Sincerely, ~:::r- Associate Vice President for Research Administration Enclosure 67

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 91125 Office ofthe Associate Vice President for Research Administration Financial Services Administration Building, Mail Code 201-15 626-395-6073 Fiscal Year 2012 Finding Condition Management's Views and Responsible Individual Number Corrective Action Plan 12.1 In testing the Institute's reporting of During FY20 11-12, we were working on understanding Director, Office of subrecipients subject to the transparency act, we the FFATA fields relative to Caltech' s (Oracle) PO Sponsored Research sampled seven files involving subawards of $2.9 system. The Office of Sponsored Research leads the million out of a total population of subawards of effort to determine an appropriate methodology for $10.3 million. We noted that FFATA reporting FF AT A reporting, implement procedures and work with was performed for all awards tested. However, Information Services and Purchasing to design special for three of the seven subrecipients tested, we queries to capture key data elements. Compliance is noted that proper transparency act reporting was impacted also by the federal agencies that are not not performed timely. always consistent or timely in submitting to the FF AT A system those awards that are subject to FF AT A reporting. Cal tech has made good faith effort to comply with the requirements and has submitted accurate data to the FF AT A Subaward Reporting System. Cal tech will work to improve compliance in this area, including more frequent communication with supporting offices and validation of subject awards. Planned Completion Date 9/30/2013 68