Reducing GI Surgery Re-Admissions, While Increasing Patient Satisfaction. D. Leigh Webb, DrPH, MPH, CTR WellStar Health System, Marietta, GA

Similar documents
Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Reducing GI Surgery Re-Admissions, While Increasing Patient Satisfaction

Discharge checklist and follow-up phone calls: the foundation to an effective discharge process

Specialty Pharmacy: What You Need To Know. William Pong, Pharm.D., MBA

Models for Patient-centered Cancer Care

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

Improving Hospital Performance Through Clinical Integration

Malnutrition Quality Improvement Opportunities for the District Hospital Leadership Forum. May 2015 avalere.com

Matching Capacity and Demand:

Managing Congestive Heart Failure as a Business September 13, 2010 Session M30 Society for Healthcare Strategy and Market Development annual meeting

Choosing and Prioritizing QI Project

Physician Compensation in an Era of New Reimbursement Models

Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement in the Ophthalmic ASC

CAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care. Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates

Webinar: Practical Approaches to Improving Patient Pre-Op Preparation

TRENDS IN CANCER PROGRAMS

Walk through a QAPI Project

EHR Enablement for Data Capture

Basic Skills for CAH Quality Managers

Start Small, Think Big! Fusing Clinical & Business Metrics to Improve Quality & Effect Change. 44 accc-cancer.org July August 2016 OI

An Initiative to Improve Patient Discharge Satisfaction

Driving High-Value Care via Clinical Pathways. Andrew Buchert, MD Gabriella Butler, MSN, RN

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Proposed fy17 LTCH PPS: New rules for Quality & Referrals

How Allina Saved $13 Million By Optimizing Length of Stay

How an ACO Provides and Arranges for the Best Patient Care Using Clinical and Operational Analytics

What is CDI? 2016 HTH FL Boot Camp. HIM/Documentation: Endurance in the Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) Race

Administrative Approval: Vice President of Professional Services

Hardwiring Processes to Improve Patient Outcomes

... Real Time Demand Capacity (RTDC) Approach. Months: Shift/Add Capacity to Address Large Mismatches

Advanced Illness Management Leveraging Person Centered Care and Reengineering the Care Team Across the Continuum

Perioperative Surgical Home

Shared Decision Making

Quality Improvement Initiative (QII): 2018 Options

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

MERCY MEDICAL CENTER. Mercy Medical Center Improves Patient Care, Lowers Costs with the Hospital Operating System

Targeted Solutions Tools

The Patient Experience at Florida Hospital Learning Module for Students

Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2

Innovating Predictive Analytics Strengthening Data and Transfer Information at Point of Care to Improve Care Coordination

Meeting the Needs of Vulnerable Patients at Discharge

Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Colon Surgery Patients

The Development of the Oncology Symptom Management Clinic

CAH PREPARATION ON-SITE VISIT

Total Joint Partnership Program Identifies Areas to Improve Care and Decrease Costs Joseph Tomaro, PhD

Transformational Patient Care Redesign Project

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Electronic Surgical Scheduling Improves Patient Safety and Productivity

CKHA Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Scorecard

What s Wrong with Healthcare?

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Documentation 101: CDI JULY 19, 2017

AirStrip ONE Cardiology

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Patient Navigation Programs Leveraging Care Pathways. Tina Evans, RN, BS Director of Nursing,Onco-Nav

Structural Heart Program Staffing Considerations- Effective Models for Clinic, Procedure and Post Procedure Care

Quality and Safety. David V. Condoluci, DO., M.A.C.O.I.

Building Referring Physician Loyalty. NACCDO-PAN April 2013

Impact of an Innovative ADC System on Medication Administration

MEASURING POST ACUTE CARE OUTCOMES IN SNFS. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Atlantic City, NJ Mar 17 th, 2015

University of Michigan Health System Program and Operations Analysis. Analysis of Pre-Operation Process for UMHS Surgical Oncology Patients

Understanding the PEPPER

Physician Performance Analytics: A Key to Cost Savings

The Link Between Patient Experience and Patient and Family Engagement

Using Lean, Six Sigma to Improve Surgical Services James Pearson J.O.P. Consulting

Redesigning Post-Acute Care: Value Based Payment Models

If you feel your patient should not be on the protocol, other options for activity restrictions are available within this order.

Reducing Preventable Hospital Readmissions in Post Acute Care Kim Barrows RN BSN

Health Reform and IRFs

Benefit Criteria for Outpatient Observation Services to Change for Texas Medicaid

CMS -1599F. The 2 Midnight Rule Effective October 1, 2013

An economic - quality business case for infection control & Prof. dr. Dominique Vandijck

COPD & Pneumonia Readmission Reduction Program. October 25, 2017

Medicare / Accountable Care Organization CHS Finance Division CPE Day November 2, 2015

How and Why We Implemented a Preop Anemia Service as Part of our Patient Blood Management Program

Incorporating Clinical Outcomes. Plan. Barbara S. Prosser, RPh V.P. Clinical Services, Critical Care Systems. Kevin L.

Administrators. Medical Directors. 61% The negative impact on our hospital-based program s. 44% We will need to consider the most appropriate or most

FY2018 Proposed Rule: Payment and Quality Reporting

Measuring Patient Reported Outcomes

Evaluating Your Anesthesia Services What to Expect From Your Anesthesia Team

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario 3/15/2016

NEW INNOVATIONS TO IMPROVE PATIENT FLOW IN THE ED AND HOSPITAL OCTOBER 12, Mike Williams, MPH/HSA The Abaris Group

Greetings from Michelle & Katie QUALITY IMPROVEMENT DIVISION OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE

CMS New Standards for Hospital Inpatient Admissions October Physician Admission Order Check List Detail

OUTPATIENT JOINT REPLACEMENT & BUNDLED PAYMENTS. Chris Bishop, CEO Regent Surgical Health

LESSONS LEARNED IN LENGTH OF STAY (LOS)

paymentbasics Defining the inpatient acute care products Medicare buys Under the IPPS, Medicare sets perdischarge

Better has no limit: Partnering for a Quality Health System

CPAs & ADVISORS. experience support // ADVANCED PAYMENT MODELS: CJR

SFGH Strategic Plan

MEDICARE UPDATES: VBP, SNF QRP, BUNDLING

Adopting Standardized Definitions The Future of Data Collection and Benchmarking in Alternate Site Infusion Must Start Now!

CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER:

Performance Scorecard 2013

Goals: Hospital Medicine at the Edges: A Specialty in Evolution Robert Harrington, MD, SFHM President, SHM

Tools & Resources for QI Success

Using A Data Warehouse and Analytics to Drive Population Health Management

Why Focus on Perioperative Services?

CMS Observation vs. Inpatient Admission Big Impacts of January Changes

National Blood Clot Alliance

Transcription:

Reducing GI Surgery Re-Admissions, While Increasing Patient Satisfaction D. Leigh Webb, DrPH, MPH, CTR WellStar Health System, Marietta, GA

Nothing to disclose Disclosures

Learning Objectives Identify the value of consistent messaging to inform patients of post-operative information and reinforcement through the continuum of care List two interventions initiated by Nurse Navigators to limit re-admissions Identify the financial impact of reducing re-admission rates

Background The Surgical Oncologists at WellStar Health System noticed an increase in GI Oncology Surgical re-admissions. Our re-admission rate was 13 percent, which is slightly higher than the national benchmark average of 12 percent

Project Approach define measure analyze improve control

Problem Statement The re-admission rate for 5S for GI Oncology surgeries January-June 1, 2015 was 14.77 percent, which exceeds the national re-admission threshold of 12 percent Total direct cost for all of the re-admissions for the same time period was $145,355 Oncology surgeons felt that the number of readmissions within the first 30 days following surgery, was higher than the national average following GI Oncology surgeries

Beginning January 1, 2016 Strategic Goals 1. To decrease re-admission rate for GI Oncology surgeries on 5 South to less than 10 percent by December 31, 2016 2. To decrease the direct cost of re-admissions by $50,000 by December 31, 2016

Process Map Patient receives AVS Patient goes home Patient receives call from customer service Complication? Yes Readmission if needed No

SIPOC Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers Provider Input requirements and measures Start: Output requirements and measures Receiver Printer Documentation of understanding Patient/ Family EMR Nurse MD Nurse Patient/Family AVS Patient receives AVS Paper orders EMR EMR Discharge order Empty Bed Next patient MD Physical criteria LOS/ DRG $ MD Care Coordinator Nurse Discharge nurse Hospital Patient/ Family WS Staff Home Other patients Return of function Discharge destination Patient goes home Decrease HAI Insurance company EMR Employees Happy customer Patient/ Family HR Patient Perception of caring Customer Service dept Press Ganey Surgical date MD Surgical type Survey tool Patient receives call from Customer Service Unhappy customer Anyone patient/family talks to

Plant Fishbone Diagram People Process TMI at teaching session Patient re-admitted Waited until last minute Didn t follow AVS instructions No pre-adm education Lack of understanding Extra visit for patient Not a priority Fragmented services No process owner Specialization of professionals Complex surgeries CMS driven Resource allocation Complex diagnosis Cost quality of care Comorbidities Limited resources Ineffective gatekeeping policies Policy The re-admission rate for GI Oncology Surgeries Jan-June, 2015 was 14.77%, exceeding national readmission threshold 12%. Total direct cost for all of the re-admissions for the same time period was $145,355.40. Oncology surgeons felt re-admissions within first 30 days following surgery, was higher than the national 10 average following GI Oncology surgeries.

Metrics There was consensus among the team that the data collection Process would be the focus of the project A data collection plan was created and executed to include the following primary metrics: 1. Percentage of GI Oncology Surgical patients re-admitted with a post-operative complication within 30 days of the surgical discharge 2. Direct cost of the in-patient admission stay for the readmission visit

Analysis During the brainstorming session, the team clarified that the appropriate collection of data would be measured by the percentage of patients who were re-admitted following a GI Oncology surgery for a direct surgical post-operative complication The team determined it was important to capture the amount of the direct cost for the admission for these patients, which is not reimbursable by insurance companies/cms

50% Results 45% 40% 35% Percentage of Patients Re-Admitted 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Month

Direct Cost $50,000.00 $45,000.00 $40,000.00 $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $- Results Direct Cost of Re-Admissions Month

Results Time Frame Re-Admission Rate Direct Cost Jan May 2015 14.77% $145,355.40 June December 2015 8.2% $71,017.33 CY 2016 5.3% $58,862.03 CY 2017 5.8% $102,484.00

Sustaining Results There were four proposed expected deliverables: 1. A system for increasing the frequency of phone calls to the patients following surgery by the physician office staff 2. Post-surgical zones document given at surgical discharge to educate patients on symptoms to watch for and when to notify the physician or emergency care

Sustaining Results 3. Develop an education booklet in conjunction with a class that explains the pre-op instructions, what will happen during the hospital stay, and what symptoms to look for after discharge. An insert of an illustration of the specific surgery will be included for each patient with a personalized instruction preop class by the Nurse Navigator. Every patient is provided with a 27 oz. infuser water bottle to encourage hydration following surgery 4. Develop an individualized pre/post-op class based upon the patient's surgical procedure to be facilitated by the Nurse Navigator

Barriers: Overcoming Barriers 1.Developing education material for the education booklet that was appropriate for patients and met copyright license agreements 2. Gaining support from physicians to require patients to attend the pre/post-op education class with the Nurse Navigator

Future Considerations The education classes have proven to be successful interventions, not only clinically but patients have expressed satisfaction with the classes Other disease sites for complicated surgeries are employing this process

Patient Comments I was truly prepared for everything you said was going to happen When I woke up in ICU, I knew what everything attached to me was and why I needed it. I was not afraid since you had explained it all during my class Thank you so much, you made this cancer surgery a lot less scary for me and my family Between the class and having you come check on me in the hospital every day after surgery meant the world to me