KIC InnoEnergy Polygeneration 1
Poly Generation InnoEnergy Light house drivers Introduction EIT guidlines
EIT EIT structure The EIT: Governing Board EIT esociety Knowledge Community EIT Green Energy EIT Knowledge and Innovation Communities Climate Change Knowledge Community Partner organizations
KIC InnoEnergy A world class alliance of top European players with a proven track record WHY WHO WHAT HOW WHEN 13 companies, 10 research institutes, 13 universities ~50% industry partners (incl. associated partners) >50% of key research players in Europe Covering the whole energy mix Knowledge triangle balanced along all dimensions 16 Dec. 2009 4
KIC InnoEnergy will bring innovation to the whole energy-mix coherent with the SET Plan WHY WHO WHAT HOW WHEN 16 Dec. 2009 5
Societas Europaea - SE 6
KIC InnoEnergy will be run like a business through a flexible and effective organizational structure 16 Dec. 2009 7 WHY WHO WHAT HOW WHEN
KICs-essential challenges for impact CEO type leadership leading to drive and focus A monitored business plan around deliverables with targeted investment returns and drivers identified upfront leading to relentless focus on results/deliverables A can do attitude, stipulating empowerment and enabling people
The EIT difference KIC s should be stakeholder owned and driven Business style management for efficiency, impact and speed Co-funding through National /Regional Other EU instruments (eg FP7) Private resources (also in-kind) EIT will then fund 100% of KIC value added activities up to max 25% of total funding. Co-location of education, research, business and innovation actors is essential 9
key performance Indicators (kpi) Number of students in the labour market Number of new products and services launched into the market Number of start ups/year Number of European patents Number of patents transferred to SMEs and ventures Number of scientific publications Consumer Perspective; Management Perspective, Financial Perspective 10
InnoEnergy- Innovation support Innovation support for students, researchers, SME s For the region Mälardalen (Stockholm- Uppsala- Västerås) InnoEnergy will give support focused on the energy sector, coordinating KTH Innovation STING. Stockholm Innovation & Growth Uppsala University (UU) Innovation Uppsala Innovation Center AB 11
KPI s Key Performance Index 450 students inserted in the labour place p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 75 25 new products and services launched into the market p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 4 20 new European patents registered p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 3 15 new companies (start ups and spin offs) p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 2,5 3 patents transferred to SME & ventures p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 0,5 300 scientific publications p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 50 12
EIT GUIDLINES 13
2. Background (1/2) During the proposal phase and in the business plan submitted, the general number of projects per year were planned: Business Plan (whole KIC): Large projects (average cost of EUR 2.8 m per year) Small projects (average cost of EUR 0.8 m per year) 2011 2012 2013 2014 8 9 12 14 18 18 22 24 14 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
2. Background (2/2) Criteria discussed during proposal stage: At least one patent/venture to be expected Output / Results: Marketable new or improved solutions or processes Transparency in KIC network (open to KIC and all the partners) High visibility (e.g. large scale demonstration site) Involvement of Industry Linked to the innovation chain Collaboration of ERI and in general through collaboration of at least 2 Partners of 2 different CC (geographically) or KIC level partner Inclusion of PhD Students, Professors Involve SME and aiming at resulting Business opportunities for SME Public Acceptance Duration 2-4 years 15 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
3. Criteria Introduction: 3 step approach Step 1: Eligibility Step 2: Selection (quality) Step 2a: Additional criteria for ongoing projects Step 3: Inclusion in Business Plan (final approval process) 16 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
3. Criteria Step 1: Eligibility criteria (Must-haves) Criterion Yes / No Comment 1 Partners: Involvement of Education, Research and Industry 2 Partners: Minimum of 3 InnoEnergy partners (or Industry KIC level partner) from at least 2 CC 3 Transparency in KIC network 4 Duration 2-4 years 5 No basic research omit 6 Aligned with SET plan and KIC strategy 7 Results within 1-3 years and easy to assess/with clear contribution to KPI: or or And At least one new product / service At least one new patent At least on spin-off / patent transferred to SME At least one scientific publication (after registration of patent) 17 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
3. Criteria Step 2: Selection - Qualitative criteria Criterion Weighting Score 1 Technical criteria / Degree of innovation: Level of novelty Alignment to InnoEnergy strategy Level of technical risk 2 Market Criteria: Time to market Obtainment of results (timing) Specific results detailed in exploitation plan: Potential to create start-ups or spin-offs New products New services New patents SME participation 3 Economic Viability Total cost of the project Requested % of EIT contribution Value for money assessment Level of financial risks 4 Internal Criteria: Number of involved KIC InnoEnergy partners, CCs High visibility / impact (e.g. large scale demonstration site) Potential to integrate with Education programmes Threshold 25% 10 Points 35% 10 Points 20% 10 Points 20% 10 Points 30 Points 18 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
Targets What: work packages-programmes Who: Responsibles When: Timeline business plan Target: KIC InnoEnergy is the point of reference and is the global technology and system leader for solutions of smart grid and storage
4. Roadmap and guidance for Thematic Meetings (1/2) Process: - Collection of ideas from all interested KIC partners Long list - Check eligibility criteria Short list - Discussion and prioritisation against selection criteria (moderated by responsible CC) - Selection of suggested projects for BP 2010 and 2011/2012/2013 - Iterative loop with Technology Development Unit and SB??? For 2010 Selection of ongoing project / upgrading to EIT / KIC projects: 1 large project per CC; 1-2 small projects per CC For 2011/2012/2013 (TWP) Definition of new projects For 2011: 1 new large project per CC, 1-2 new small project per CC* For 2012: 1 new large in 3 CCs, 1 new small project in 3 CCs For 2013: 1 new large in 3 CCs, 1 new small project in 3 CCs 20 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects *optionally additional ongoing projects can be planned
4. Roadmap and guidance for Thematic Meetings (2/2) State for each project: a) Responsible CC and all involved partners (also from other CC) b) Objectives, short work plan, start and duration, estimated cost c) Results and contribution to KPI (per year) d) Suggested % of EIT funding e) Other sources of funding (e.g. in kind of participating partners) f) Involved external partners g) Any identifiable risks Deadlines (to be confirmed): First Annual Grant Agreement: mid-june 2010 Tri-Annual Work Programme: first draft mid-june 2010 21 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
3. Criteria Additional criteria for selection of on-going projects For projects of partners or a group of partners which are ongoing, additional criteria have to be respected if they are supposed be receive extra/add on funding: 1. The part of project which shall be run within InnoEnergy should be easy to define without incurring in any complicated funding (e.g. double funding FP7 / EIT) or patent related issues 2. KIC external partners who are involved in the project must agree to the possible labelling of the project as InnoEnergy project the transparency rule within KIC InnoEnergy the involvement of further InnoEnergy partners 22 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
5. General process for project selection and business planning Project selection process Phase 1: Pre-Project Partner has an initial idea of the project Standardised template! He contacts the Thematic Coordinator Longlist of projects Step 1: Eligibility check Not eligible Rejected project Eligible Further documentation Shortlist of projects For each project Invitation of possible contributors Meeting for preproject design Analysis of real options: -Time to market -Risk -Value assessment IPR Planning Step 2: Project selection Positive Evaluation by Thematic Coordinator, Approval by CEO and directors Inclusion in Business Plan Kick-off Implementation Negative rejected PMS and evaluation 23 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects
5. General process for project selection and business planning Business Planning Process Business Plan / Programming Governance & Responsibility Subsidiarity & Innovation KIC level (Executive Board) CC level Strategy development / programming Design and CC coordination of yearly BP Alignment and adoption of CC and overall BP Change Requirements Review, approval and oversight by Executive and Steering Board Execution of BP in coordi-nation with Development Units and KIC level Project KIC level CC level Idea no in BP? yes Check with responsible development unit, risk assessment, involvement of CC / lead / funding Detail objec-tives, delivera-bles, resources Project proposal Nomination project manager and information of other involved CC (at least 2) Confirm Go No go Execute 24 Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects