CMS Releases Proposed Rule for Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program

Similar documents
Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)

CMS in the 21 st Century

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Value Based Purchasing

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Our Hospital s Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Journey

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Understanding Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

WA Flex Program Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Program

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Medicare Payment Strategy

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

Special Open Door Forum Participation Instructions: Dial: Reference Conference ID#:

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Program Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Facility State National

P4P Programs 9/13/2013. Medicare P4P Programs. Medicaid P4P Programs

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

Step-by-Step Calculations for Value-Based Purchasing

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Presented by: Gara Edelstein, CNO, CHS & St. Catherine of Siena Nicolette Fiore-Lopez, CNO, St. Charles Hospital Susan Penque, CNO, South Nassau

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE AND VALUE BASED PURCHASING: Leigh Humphrey, MBA, LMSW, CPHQ

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

HACs, Readmissions and VBP: Hospital Strategies for Turning Lemons into Lemonade

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

2013 Health Care Regulatory Update. January 8, 2013

PROPOSED POLICY AND PAYMENT CHANGES FOR INPATIENT STAYS IN ACUTE-CARE HOSPITALS AND LONG-TERM CARE HOSPITALS IN FY 2014

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

New Mexico Hospital Association

Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project. March 11, Chillicothe, Mo.

HACs, Readmissions and VBP: Hospital Strategies for Turning

State FY2013 Hospital Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Guide

CAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care. Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates

FFY 2018 IPPS PROPOSED RULE CHA MEMBER FORUM

Care Coordination What Matters

Troubleshooting Audio

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Monthly Performance Improvement Call

The Data Game. Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ VP Research & Market Insights

Connecting the Revenue and Reimbursement Cycles

SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL and TRAUMA CENTER

HCAHPS. Presented by: Bill Sexton. Proudly recognized as one of the Nation s Top 100 Critical Access Hospitals - ivantage Health Analytics

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) / PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

CY 2012 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule

What should board members know about new health care reform payment structures?*

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2016

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

NOTE: New Hampshire rules, to

Is Emergency Department Quality Related to Other Hospital Quality Domains?

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Troubleshooting Audio

Transcription:

SPECIAL BULLETIN Monday, January 10, 2011 CMS Releases Proposed Rule for Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) late Friday, Jan. 7, released a proposed regulation (http://www.ofr.gov/ofrupload/ofrdata/2011-00454_pi.pdf) for the new hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a VBP program to pay hospitals for their actual performance on quality measures, rather than just the reporting of those measures, beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2013. The VBP program will apply to all acute-care prospective payment system (PPS) hospitals. Key provisions of the proposed rule are summarized below. Quality Measures Selected: The rule proposes the quality measures that would be used for the program. For the first year, FY 2013, CMS proposes 17 clinical quality measures as well as the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient experiences with care survey for inclusion in the VBP program. The clinical quality measures selected include three measures of heart attack care, three measures of heart failure care, four measures of pneumonia care, and seven measures of surgical care. The ACA stipulates that the program include healthcare-associated infection measures. For FY 2013, four of the surgical care measures would fulfill that requirement. By law, the program cannot include the existing readmissions measures because of the separate readmissions payment penalty provision. A full list of the measures proposed for FY 2013 can be found at the end of this Special Bulletin. For FY 2014, CMS proposes to add the heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia mortality measures to the VBP program, as well as nine patient safety and inpatient quality indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and eight measures of hospital-acquired conditions. CMS did not propose to include efficiency measures in the VBP program at this time.

Special Bulletin Page 2 of 5 Calculation of Performance Scores: According to the ACA, hospitals will receive the higher of their attainment or improvement score for each measure. For the clinical process measures, CMS proposes to set a minimum achievement threshold for each individual quality measure at the national median score. CMS proposes to set a performance benchmark for each measure at the level of the mean of the top decile of all hospitals scores on that measure. Thus, hospitals that score at or above the minimum achievement threshold will receive at least some points for attainment, and hospitals that score at or above the benchmark will receive the highest number of points for that measure. Hospitals improvement scores will be assigned by awarding points based on how the hospital has improved on its performance from a baseline period to the performance period. CMS proposes that scores for HCAHPS would be calculated similarly to scores for the clinical process measures, but the HCAHPS scores also would include a component for assessing the consistency among the hospital s scores on the individual HCAHPS questions. To determine hospitals overall scores, CMS proposes to first group the clinical process measures and the HCAHPS measures into two different domains. A score would be calculated for each domain by summing the individual measure scores within that domain, weighting each measure equally. Thus, the domain score would equal the percentage of points earned out of the total possible points for which a hospital is eligible. CMS proposes to then combine the scores for the clinical process and HCAHPS domains to determine a total performance score. For FY 2013, CMS proposes that the domain of the clinical process measures would account for 70 percent of the hospital s score, and the HCAHPS domain would account for 30 percent of the hospital s score. Beginning in FY 2014, when CMS proposes adding outcomes measures to the VBP program, a third domain would be included in the performance scores to incorporate those measures. CMS will propose the weighting of the three domains in a future rule. Hospitals Excluded from the Program: Under the ACA, certain hospitals are excluded from the VBP program. First, Maryland hospitals, hospitals located outside the 50 states and the District of Columbia, psychiatric, rehabilitation, long-term care, children s, cancer and critical access hospitals are excluded. Second, the ACA excludes hospitals that do not meet the requirements of the Medicare pay-for-reporting program. Third, the ACA excludes hospitals that have been cited by the Secretary for deficiencies that pose immediate jeopardy

Special Bulletin Page 3 of 5 to the health or safety of patients. CMS proposes to define these hospitals as any cited through the Medicare State Survey and Certification process for such deficiencies during the performance period. Finally, the ACA excludes from the VBP program hospitals with small numbers of applicable patient cases or measures, as defined by the Secretary. For the clinical process measures domain, CMS proposes to exclude from hospitals scores any measures for which they report fewer than 10 cases. The agency proposes to also exclude from the VBP program any hospitals for which fewer than four of the 17 proposed clinical process measures apply. CMS also proposes to exclude from the VBP program any hospital that reports fewer than 100 HCAHPS surveys during the performance period. Withholding and Allocating VBP Payment Incentives: Funding for the program will be generated by reducing all inpatient PPS Medicare-severity diagnosis-related group (MS-DRG) operating payments to participating hospitals using a phased-in approach. Payments will be reduced by 1 percent in FY 2013; 1.25 percent in FY 2014; 1.5 percent in FY 2015; 1.75 percent in FY 2016; and 2 percent in FY 2017 and beyond. The reduction will be applied to all MS-DRG operating payments but will not affect disproportionate share, indirect medical education, low-volume adjustment or outlier payments. The VBP program is budget neutral; all funds withheld must be paid out to hospitals. CMS proposes to translate each hospital s total performance score into an incentive payment using a simple linear function. It proposes that all hospitals with scores above zero will receive an incentive payment. CMS does not make any proposals around how the incentive payments will be made (e.g., as discharge add-ons or a lump sum). The incentives will apply for one year only, and the payment incentives are not carried over as baseline payment rates for the following year. Implementation Dates: The payment changes will be implemented with hospitals FY 2013 payments. In that year, for both the proposed clinical process and HCAHPS measures, CMS proposes a baseline period of July 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010, and a performance period of July 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012. In future years for these measures, CMS states that it anticipates proposing to use a full year for the performance period. However, for the mortality measures that CMS proposes to include in the VBP program beginning in FY 2014, the agency proposes a performance period of July 1, 2011 through Dec. 31, 2012, with a baseline period of July 1, 2008 through Dec. 31, 2009.

Special Bulletin Page 4 of 5 The ACA requires CMS to notify hospitals of the performance period scores that will be used to determine their VBP incentive payment at least 60 days before FY 2013 begins. Because the proposed performance period would end only six months prior to the beginning of FY 2013, CMS proposes to inform each hospital through its QualityNet account of its estimated incentive payment at least 60 days prior to the start of FY 2013 (by Aug. 2, 2012). CMS then proposes to inform each hospital of its actual incentive payment for FY 2013 on Nov. 1, 2012. Data Validation: CMS proposes to apply the existing Medicare pay-for-reporting program data validation process for both the pay-for-reporting and VBP programs. Demonstration Programs for CAHs and Hospitals with Small Numbers of Cases/Measures: The ACA established two demonstration programs for CAHs and hospitals with an insufficient number of patient cases or applicable measures. The demonstration programs, which also are budget neutral, must begin by March 23, 2012 and will run for a three-year period. CMS did not make proposals around these demonstrations in this rule; we anticipate the agency will release additional information about the demonstrations and how hospitals may apply to participate later this year. Next Steps The proposed rule will be published in the January 13 Federal Register; a display copy is available at http://www.ofr.gov/ofrupload/ofrdata/2011-00454_pi.pdf. Comments will be accepted through March 8. Look for an AHA Regulatory Advisory containing a more detailed analysis of the proposed rule in the coming weeks.

Special Bulletin Page 5 of 5 List of Measures Proposed for Inclusion in FY 2013 Hospital VBP Program Condition Heart attack Heart Failure Pneumonia Healthcare- Associated Infection Surgical Care Improvement Patient Experience of Care Measure Aspirin at discharge Fibrinolytic therapy received within 30 minutes of hospital arrival Primary PCI received within 90 minutes of hospital arrival Discharge instructions received Evaluation of LVS function ACEI or ARB for LVSD Pneumococcal vaccination Blood culture performed prior to administration of first antibiotic(s) Initial antibiotic selection for CAP in immunocompetent patient Influenza vaccination Prophylactic antibiotic(s) one hour before incision Selection of antibiotic given to surgical patients Prophylactic antibiotic(s) stopped within 24 hours after surgery Cardiac surgery patients with controlled 6AM postoperative serum glucose Surgery patients on a beta blocker prior to arrival who received a beta blocker during the perioperative period Surgery patients with recommended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis ordered Surgery patients who received appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis within 24 hours prior to surgery to 24 hours after surgery HCAHPS survey results on patient interaction with doctors, nurses, and hospital staff; cleanliness and quietness of the organization; pain control; communication about medicines; and discharge information