Improving Equality in PCS Weight Allowances Across the Ranks

Similar documents
Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Wildland Fire Assistance

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

Medical Requirements and Deployments

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Report Documentation Page

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Acquisition. Diamond Jewelry Procurement Practices at the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (D ) June 4, 2003

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Information Technology

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

Improving ROTC Accessions for Military Intelligence

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Report Documentation Page

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

DEFENSE BUSINESS BOARD. Employing Our Veterans: Expediting Transition through Concurrent Credentialing. Report to the Secretary of Defense

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Transcription:

Improving Equality in PCS Weight Allowances Across the Ranks Capt Josh Grimsley CG 15 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2009 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Improving Equality in PCS Weight Allowances Across the Ranks 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) United States Marine Corps,Command and Staff College, Marine Corps University,2076 South Street, Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Relocation allowances for permanent change of station moves The Department of Defense reports that every year, about one-third of all military members move. Each of these transitions creates financial burdens for these military members. United States General Accounting Office reports, according to DOD, mid-grade and senior non-commissioned officers (enlisted personnel in grades E-5 to E-9) average more than $1,000 in nonreimbursable expenses each time they move. Officers absorb an even a greater amount. 1 Often these nonreimbursable expenses are incurred because the service members personal belongings outweigh their maximum weight allowances as defined in United States Code, Title 37, Section 406 (b) (1) (C) (see appendix 1 for USC). Current household goods weight allowances are based solely on a service member s present grade the higher the pay grade, the higher the maximum allowance. However, no records show why the maximum allowances were established at the current levels. 2 Each branch of service adheres to the same regulations when conducting a move within the United States. Service members relocation allowances for household goods should be based on rank; however, service members must be apportioned additional weight for the number of years of service as well as number of dependents to ensure equity across the ranks. 2

Background Information According to a survey conducted in the summer of 2001 by the Defense Capabilities and Management Office, the average time between permanent change of station (PCS) moves is about two years. The Defense Capabilities and Management Office works directly for Congress and conducts Department of Defense audits based on Congress s requests. The chart below, submitted to Congress by the Capabilities and Management Office, depicts service members average duration of time on station before conducting PCS moves. According to the Defense Capabilities and Management Office, 65% of E-8s and 85% of W-2s, throughout the Department of Defense, will PCS before spending three years on station. Furthermore, the Defense Capabilities and Management Office found the Marine Corps had the shortest average time between PCS. 3 Thus, Marine E-8s and W-2s move more often than depicted by the chart. These two grades have significant disparity between weight allowances, and yet they are both mandated to move generally with less than three years on station. Because service members are required to move so often, ensuring adequate compensation is vital. 3

Average Duration of PCS Tours During Career by Pay Grade Group Current rank-based weight allowances The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Installations and Logistics) stated, Weight allowances are based on grade to recognize each member's relative position and responsibility the system recognizes that with the increased rank and income, the member's personal property increases. 4 Basing allowances solely on grade creates disparity among the ranks. When comparing household good weight allowances for an officer and an 4

enlisted service member who have the same time in service (in most cases when the enlisted member has greater years of service) officers have a higher basic housing allowance. For example, an O-1 who has just entered the service rates almost the same weight allowance that an E-7 does who has been in the service for ten plus years. It is unjust to provide a lower weight allowance for this E-7 because he or she has a comparable or lower income than the O-1. According to the weight restrictions established by U.S. Code, Title 37, Section 406, an O-2, W-2, and an E-8 with dependents rate the same weight allowance (13,500 lbs) when conducting a PCS transition. 5 Because household goods weight restrictions are based solely on a service member s present grade, the restricted allowances fail to compensate many service members for the normal accumulation of goods that occur as a career progresses and as a family grows. Impact of service length on accumulation of goods According to the chart below, the minimum time in service for an O-2 is two years compared with an E-8 whose minimum time in service spans over 18 years. 6 A W-2 from a technical military occupation specialty has a minimum time in service of 9.5 years, while an W-2 from a non-technical specialty has a minimum of 17.5 years of service. 7 However, because E-8s and W-2s have a 5

significantly greater amounts of time in service than an O-2, they presumably accumulate larger amounts of personal property than an O-2, yet they are apportioned the same weight allowance with the current regulations. To ensure equity across the officer and enlisted ranks, service members must be apportioned additional weight for the number of years of service. Impact of growing families on accumulation of goods The average age for an E-8 ranges from 36 to 46 years old; by comparison, the average age of an O-2 is 25 years old. As service members age, their families grow. In the Marine Corps, only 21% of O-2s have two or more dependents; in contrast, 80% of E-8s and W-2s have two or more dependents. 8 With each additional dependent, household goods are increased, and yet the compensation to the service member is not increased. To fairly allocate weight restrictions, weight allowances for an O-2, W-2, and an E-8 could remain at 13,500 pounds; however, each service member would rate an additional 100 pounds for each year of service and 200 pounds for each additional dependent. However, a service members weight allowance could not exceed the maximum weight allowance. 6

Weight Allowance and Time in Service for Pay Grade Burden on service member to avoid weight allowance overages Because the disparity in fair compensation exists, service members face either paying a fee for going over their weight allowances or choosing one or more of the following options: purging their household goods, conducting a Do-It-Yourself (DITY) or partial DITY move, and/or storing personal items in order to meet their weight requirements. To avoid arduous financial penalties, service members often jettison personal 7

property prior to a PCS move. 9 When items are purged prior to a PSC move they will need to be replaced once the service member reaches his or her new duty station. A second option is for the service member to execute a DITY or partial DITY move in order to minimize the weight moved by the government, creating additional burdens of transport, gas, and equipment fees. The third option is for the service member to store his or her own personal property in a storage facility to avoid surpassing his or her weight allowance. Using this option, the service member will incur storage fees. Ultimately, each of these options requires the service member to bear the burden of additional fees to avoid weight overages. If service members were apportioned additional weight allowances for years of service as well as number of dependents these additional burdens would be minimized. Stress created by unrealistic weight restrictions In most cases the service member does not realize he or she has to pay for excess weight until the completion of the move. At this point the service member receives the bill of laden from the moving company. A service member may have parted with valuable items unnecessarily in order to avoid excess weight fees only to find out that he or she was well within his or her 8

allotted weight limit. This undue hardship will not completely be mitigated; however, allocating additional weight allowances for his or her years of service and the number of dependents will greatly minimize stressful PCS moves with respect to unrealistic weight restrictions. Civilian federal employee weight allowance Civilian federal employees, including DOD civilian employees, are authorized the maximum weight allowance (18,000 pounds) for employees with dependents and those employees without dependents. These weight allowances are authorized regardless of the number of dependents or years of service. 10 By authorizing civilian employees greater weight allowances, regardless of pay grade, devalues the service members years of service. Conclusion Making a PCS move is never easy for the service member or his or her family. One way to ease the stress would be to lift the financial burden a PSC move puts on the service member due to impractical weight restrictions. To ensure equity across the span of ranks, service members relocation allowances for household goods should be based on rank; nevertheless, it also needs to account for years of service and number of dependents. 9

Bibliography Lokovic, James E. Household Goods Weight Allowances during Permanent Change of Station Moves for Senior Non- Commissioned Officers. Deputy Executive Director and Director, Military and Government Relations. <http://www. fra.org/content/fra/legislativeagenda/2005legislativeagenda /ReformofPCSProcess-PointPaper.htm> (January 2005). Marine Corps - Officer Promotion Process, U.S.M.C. Officer Promotion Overview, 2000, <http://www.military.com/military Careers/Content/0,14556,Promotions_Marine_Officer,00.html>. Marine Corps - Warrant Officer Appointment Process, Appointment to Warrant Officer (WO), 2000, <http://www. military.com/militarycareers/content/0,14556,mpdc_options_w O_Marine,00.html>. Powers, Rod Military Moves, Property Shipment Weight Allowances for Military Moves. About.Com. US Military.01 January 2003.<http://usmilitary.about.com/od/assignments/l/ blpropweight.htm>. United States Code, Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services, Chapter 7 Allowances: Section 406. Travel and Transportation Allowances: Dependents; Baggage and Household Effects.https://www.smartwebmove.navsup. navy.mil/swm/documents/swm9entitlemts406.pdf. United States General Accounting Office, Military Personnel, Longer Time Between Moves Related to Higher Satisfaction and Retention: Briefing Report to the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate, 2001, Washington, D.C.: GAO- 01-841. United States General Accounting Office, Military Personnel, Proposed Increases in Household Goods Weight Allowances: Briefing Report to Congressional Requesters, 1987, Washington, D.C.: GAO/NSIAD-87-111BR. WebMASS, Manpower & Reserve Affairs, Marine Manpower Enlisted Assignment-82, USMC, accessed 08 December 2008. Years in Service at Promotion, Enlisted, Military.com, 2005, <http://www.military.com/contentfiles/years-inservice-at-promotion.htm>. 10