Project Initiation Document. Pilot name: Improving customer communication Municipality: Kristiansand Work-package: WP3 Customer services Date:

Similar documents
Project Initiation Document

Project Initiation Document. Pilot name: 1777 Municipality: City of Kortrijk Work-package: WP3 Date: July 2010 (v2)

Project Initiation Document

Project Initiation Document

Innovative Models in egovernance Best Practice Digital Austria

e-government the state of play

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Competitiveness and Innovation CIP

European Commission Information Society and Media Directorate General. November 2005

Services to Local Government

Integrated Service Delivery Platform

Organisation Implementation Cooperation - Coordination

URBACT III Programme Manual

egovernment modules of Eurostat

ELLECTRA-WeB project. Kostas Thiveos Senior Consultant, Research & Innovation Development. ICT & Entrepreneurship: Two day event on 19 & 20 June 2007

HIMSS Europe ANNUAL SURVEY 2016

OpenPEPPOL Guidance on the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF UP TO 25 TRANSFER NETWORKS

PEPPOL Pan European Public Procurement Online

EVALUATION OF THE SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (SMEs) ACCIDENT PREVENTION FUNDING SCHEME

MC-eGov Study on Multi-channel Delivery Strategies and Sustainable Business Models for Public Services addressing Socially Disadvantaged Groups

Deliverable 3.3b: Evaluation of the call procedure

HORIZON Societal Challenge 6 egovernment. Supporting the implementation of egovernment at regional and local level. Brussels, 15 November 2016

Deliverable N.: 7.4 & 7.5

NATIONAL LOTTERY CHARITIES BOARD England. Mapping grants to deprived communities

Towards faster implementation and uptake of open government

Informal carers skills and training a tool for recognition and empowerment

Services within the ICTFOOTPRINT.eu ecosystem

H2020 and CEF Thomas Jaeger European Commission DG CNECT, Unit G.2: Creativity

TRANSNATIONAL YOUTH INITIATIVES 90

Europe's Digital Progress Report (EDPR) 2017 Country Profile Slovenia

Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 September 2017 (OR. en)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Bahrain s e-government Journey

Chances and challenges of digitalisation in rural areas (CORA project)

Measuring the socio- economical returns of e- Government: lessons from egep

eprocurement without borders in Europe

IO1 A2. Needs Validation Report. 1. Financial Check Training Course FCT Course Activity 2 Deliverable 2 Delivery Date March 2018

Work-family balance : prevalence of family-friendly employment policies and practices in Hong Kong

Interoperable eid as a key enabler for pan-european (egovernment) services

Erasmus+ Application Form. Call: A. General Information. B. Context. B.1. Project Identification

Measuring R&D in the Nonprofit Sector: The European Experience

Erasmus+ General Information. Context. Application Form Call: KA2 Cooperation and Innovation for Good Practices

Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs Users Guide

Study on Organisational Changes, Skills and the Role of Leadership required by egovernment (Working title)

The future of innovation in view of the new EU policies: Europe 2020, Innovation Union, Horizon Nikos Zaharis, SEERC December 29, 2011

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ENGAGEMENT Innovating with Public Administration for citizens

Equal Distribution of Health Care Resources: European Model

EUROPEAN SUSTAINABILITY AWARD Rules of Contest

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre

LAUNCH EVENT Fast Track to Innovation

Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) Country Report Latvia

Saint-Luc Transformation: Impacted by Belgian Network Regulation?

Introduction. 1 About you. Contribution ID: 65cfe814-a0fc-43c ec1e349b48ad Date: 30/08/ :59:32

AFRICAN ELEPHANT SUMMIT GABORONE, BOTSWANA 2 DECEMBER 2013

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Proposal template. Pilot Project Call PP

Access to finance for innovative SMEs

Erasmus+ Application Form. Call: A. General Information. B. Context. B.1. Project Identification

ICT in Northern Ireland. Dr Jimmy Courtney NIGPC

NORITS - Nordic Interoperable Tolling Systems

Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 April 2016 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Report on the interim evaluation of the «Daphne III Programme »

Erasmus+ Application Form. Call: 2014 KA2 Cooperation and Innovation for Good Practices. A. General Information. B. Context

Competitiveness and innovation 1

Standard Proposal Templates: Project proposal (Part B)

CONSULTATION PAPER BY DG INTERNAL MARKET AND SERVICES ON THE PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS DIRECTIVE 15 March 2011

Fast Track to Innovation Pilot ( ) January 2014

Physician / Investigator. Over 40% of clinical trial data are entered into health record and EDC 1

EURAMET and the European Metrology Research Programme. 2 nd March 2007 TC Mass & Related Quantities. Andy Henson

Presentation of the Workshop Training the Experts Workshop Brussels, 4 April 2014

First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%

THE NORDIC LIST. An international collaborative tool for publication analysis with relevance for open access

Horizon ERA-NET Cofund actions

Models for crossborder. collaboration. IDABC Workshop LinuxDay Prague 11 April Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz. Open Source Phase Review Page 1

A little book about EU funding for clusters. Your way to the euros

Putting Finland in the context

Digital Public Services. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 Digital Public Services

CIP Innovation and entrepreneurship, ICT and intelligent energy

Horizon Support to Public-Public Partnershiups

Partner Declaration ITALY-CROATIA PROGRAMME

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS

Capacity Building in the field of youth

State Aid Rules. Webinar TAFTIE Academy 22th of October 2015 Maija Lönnqvist, Tekes

PARTNERS AND PROJECTS Charity registration No SC in Scotland

MOBILITY PROJECT FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AND YOUTH WORKERS

Bahrain, Dubai, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco

An action plan to boost research and innovation

Scottish Ambulance Service

Overview of European Grants in Research and Development and Investment Incentives

NOTICE OF CALL FOR PROPOSALS. with a view to obtaining grants in the field of rail transport, in particular

Reporting in the ems Manual

ACF Industry Survey 2013 Bev White

Getting Ready for Horizon th February 2013

Institute of Legal Information Theory and Technique Italian National Research Council Maria Angela Biasiotti Mattia Epifani, Fabrizio Turchi

ERDF in the Heart of the South West Eifion Jones Head of Strategy & Operations

Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) Country Report Hungary

Transforming health & care together EUROPE MAY 2018 Sitges, Barcelona JOIN US IN SITGES! PRE-CONFERENCE BROCHURE

KONNECT 1 st PERIODIC REPORT

Prague Local Action Plan: Age and care

Background paper. Cross-border healthcare in the EU

Transcription:

Project Initiation Document Pilot name: Improving customer communication Municipality: Kristiansand Work-package: WP3 Customer services Date: Edinburgh Napier University October 2009

Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Pilot information... 4 2.1. Pilot name... 4 2.2. Pilot acronym... 4 2.3. Pilot website... 4 2.4. What type of initiative is the pilot?... 5 2.5. Pilot country... 5 2.6. Pilot city/region... 5 2.7. Pilot start date... 5 2.8. Pilot finish date... 5 2.9. Pilot operational date... 5 3. Background to the pilot... 5 3.1. Pilot topics... 6 3.2. Pilot sector... 6 3.3. Target users of pilot... 7 3.4. Description of target users... 7 3.5. Type of service... 8 3.6. Overall implementation approach... 8 4. Pilot description... 9 4.1. Objectives... 9 4.2. Approach... 9 4.3. Scope... 9 4.4. Exclusions... 9 4.5. Deliverables... 9 4.6. Constraints... 9 4.7. Assumptions/dependencies... 10 5. Business case... 11 5.1. Customer benefits... 11 5.2. Performance benefits... 11 5.3. Employee benefits... 12 5.4. Financial benefits... 12 5.5. Project benefits... 12 6. Organisation... 13 7. Resources... 13 7.1. Funding sources... 13 7.2. Overall cost/budget ( )... 13 7.3. Contribution from local funds ( )... 14 7.4. Contribution from Smart Cities (regional, in )... 14 7.5. Contribution from Smart Cities (transnational, in )... 14 7.6. Staff resources... 14 8. Pilot plan... 16 9. Reporting framework... 15 10. Risks... 16

What happens next... 17

1. Introduction A project initiation document [PID] is a document that brings together in one place the key information needed to start, manage and evaluate a pilot. All stakeholders should be informed of the development of a PID, and the final PID should be agreed and signed off by the management in municipal partners. The PID should contain information setting out the "who, what, why, when and how" for the local pilot. It should define all major aspects of the pilot, and can be used as a key part in the management of the delivery of the pilot and sets the baselines that will be used in any assessment of the pilot's success. All Smart Cities partners are expected to produce a PID for each local pilot. These will be used by the project and by local partners to measure progress against the aims and objectives set out in each pilot's PID. Many partners will already be expected to develop PIDs for their pilots: in this case relevant information should be copied into this form. 2. Pilot information This section sets out the basic information about your pilot. 2.1. Pilot name What s your pilot project called? Customer services Automated processes, Process re-engeneering Develop work-flow and integration tools (BPEL) into the standardised architecture of the municipal ICT-structure Customer contact centre Increase information quality by use of maps, also a limited interactivity Digital communication New channels of communication 2.2. Pilot acronym Does the pilot have an acronym? [e.g. SCRAN?] If not, leave blank. 2.3. Pilot website Does the pilot have a local website? If not, leave blank.

2.4. What type of initiative is the pilot? Select all that apply to your pilot. x Project or service Award scheme Network Promotion/awareness scheme x Strategic initiative Other 2.5. Pilot country Belgium x Norway Germany Netherlands Sweden UK 2.6. Pilot city/region Kristiansand 2.7. Pilot start date September 2008 2.8. Pilot finish date September 2011 2.9. Pilot operational date When did your pilot go live to the public/businesses? The project is of a nature that all improvement will be presented to the public when tested and accepted. 3. Background to the pilot Set out the context for the pilot: why are you interested in doing this work, what issues do you need to address, why do you feel you need to address them etc..

The background for this pilot is the increasing use and demand for e-services and the use of web based services in Norway. In addition the organisation is forced to look at new and more rational ways to handle service, due to tougher financial situation and a demand for less cost in administration in the future. The public or up to as much as 70% of the public says in different surveys that they prefer to use the web as the main channel for communication and information. The municipality of Kristiansand is working hard to supply solutions for meeting this demand. There is obviously some people that prefer telephone or being served at the counter, they will of course have this opportunity, BUT the employees will use the same forms as the customers, thus standardising the forms, the information structure and the ICT structure. 3.1. Pilot topics Select all that apply to your pilot x Efficiency & Effectiveness, Benchmarking Interoperability Inclusive egovernment Legal Aspects x eidentity and esecurity x Multi-channel Delivery eparticipation, edemocracy and evoting Open Source eprocurement x Policy x Services for Businesses Regional and Local x Services for Citizens x User-centric Services High Impact Services with Pan-European Scope Other x Infrastructure 3.2. Pilot sector Select all that apply to your pilot x Communication (infrastructure) Internal market Crime, Justice and Law Culture and Media Local/Regional Community Development Procurement Customs x Social Security x Education, Science and Research x Social Services Electricity/Gas Tax

Employment Travel, Transports and Motoring Environment X Water Fire Services X Other Social Services x Healthcare Other 3.3. Target users of pilot Select all that apply to your pilot egoverment X Disadvantaged/deprived communities x Administrative Families and children at risk x Business (self-employed) Homeless Business (industry) x Minorities and migrants x Business (SME) x Older people (60+) x Citizen People living in poverty and/or precarity Civil society People with anti-social and criminal behavior Intermediaries x People with disability Other x People with health and long-term care problems ehealth People with no or poor digital literacy Add Patients x SMEs, associations and intermediaries x General public Unemployed people Health authorities Health professionals einclusion Young people at risk of marginalisation Other Women Any citizen 3.4. Description of target users Please describe your target group and provide some information on size, composition and needs.

Most services in Norwegian municipalities are offered to citizens, these are the prime target group for the project. A few services are dedicated to Businesses, these will of course, be included, but the vast majority are for citizens. The project is basically focused on information and communication in the administrative area, the internal communication concerning the actual delivery of services are only marginally effected. 3.5. Type of service Select the one that best applies to your pilot x Not applicable/not available IT infrastructures and products Awareness-raising information Training and education Content provision Participation Inclusive services of general interest Other 3.6. Overall implementation approach Select the one that best applies to your pilot x Public administration Private sector Non-profit sector Partnerships between administration and/or private sector and/or non-profit sector

4. Pilot description These sections of the PID describe what the pilot will do and how it will do it. 4.1. Objectives What outcomes should be delivered by the pilot? (Business case/benefits should be set out in Section 5) Several services should be process described, evaluated for use of digital communication and automatication. 4.2. Approach How will the pilot do this? By using process description and process reengineering techniques, as well as tools for digital forms, design of databases/data warehouses, integration with digital archive and publishing in several channels. 4.3. Deliverables What outputs/processes/procedures/definitions will be delivered by the pilot? The output will be an increasing number of services being digitalised both in communication, information and in administration. The final vision is that all communication should be prepared for the citizens to communicate digitally and the same for all administrative work inside the different service sectors of the municipality. 4.4. Exclusions What issues are outside the scope of the pilot? The establishment of new web pages of the municipality is an integral part of the communication but is not included, however all newly developed functionality. With the purpose of increasing information quality, communication quality and customer services will be covered. 4.5. Constraints What issues constrain the pilot? (These will include financial, technical, and timing issues.)

A few constrains are present: There are some applications that may cause difficulties in building interfaces There are limits in the budgets, due mostly to cuts taken before the application was sent, this is for example CRM-system, which would have a tremendous impact if web services and customer contact centre are seen together. 4.6. Assumptions/dependencies Set out the assumptions you have made at the beginning of the pilot particularly if your pilot is dependent upon other projects/pilots. Identify external factors which may affect the pilot. The governmental project of e-identity/authentication had an impact, but we will include, in the services, what is at hand at the moment, and expand when new opportunities open.

5. Business case Set out why your municipality feels the pilot is necessary, what the pilot seeks to achieve, and what benefits it will deliver. Include how these benefits will be measured (e.g. increased customer satisfaction, faster processing etc.). 5.1. Summary/overview Use digital forms for applications to ease the access ability for the users and the workload for the employees. 5.2. Customer benefits Customers will have mainly two benefits from the project. 1. The possibility to do all communication by using digital forms and e-mails 2. The possibility to follow the case from application to decision, by a unique number given to some, if not all, cases. 5.3. Performance benefits There will be several performance benefits: 1. Every case will be recorded and given an archive number, efficiency increase especially over time 2. It will be traceable and the possibility to prepare reports saying something about time spent in comparison with deliverance guarantees 3. Some services can be automated, which lead to no administrative hours needed. 4. Indicators of quality can be determined and published 5. Personnel changes will be eased as all services has a process description explaining in detail what should be done, how and in what order. 6. Architecture of ICT continuously improving 7. a move towards one master data-base for all customer information operated by customers themselves and updating or serving all servicesystems 8.

5.4. Employee benefits Main benefit is the empowering possibility to form your own job by giving your knowledge of work and subject into the design of how the work actually should be done. Other benefits may be ease of changing to another job by seeing a standardised way of how work is done in a project description. Employees may also find it a benefit to see the results of their work monitored continuously, and even published on a service level on the web. 5.5. Financial benefits There are obvious financial benefits since the experience of reengineering tells that most processes have a vast cost reduction potential, something that is the driver of the engagement. Cost reductions often means redundancies, which should however be balanced by transfers between services and increasing quality in some services that in the future seems to either have to reduce quality (if no new resources are given) or be privatised something which at the moment is unwanted by the politicians. 5.6. Project benefits

6. Pilot management/organisation Set out the organisational structure that will manage your pilot. This should include relevant senior managers, project/pilot managers and staff. Please indicate how the pilot will be managed. A steering committee put together of: CEO of the municipality, The Deputy CEO, Managing director of Health and social services and one representative from the unions. A project group lead by Adviser of Quality and managerial reporting, Service centre leader Health and social care, ICT- developer and Web-master and communication manager. THIS IS THE ACTUAL MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT. A reference group with one representative from each of the service areas in the municipality Ad hoc persons from the different services that will have services described, reengineered, digitalised and hopefully automated. 7. Staff/financial resources Set out what resources are available to deliver the pilot. This should include what budget and staff the pilot can call upon. 7.1. Funding sources Select all that apply to your pilot x Public funding EU x Public funding local Public funding national Public funding regional Private sector Charity, voluntary contributions 7.2. Overall cost/budget ( ) App Euro 504 605. Excluding transnational Euro app 75 000

7.3. Contribution from local funds ( ) Euro 252 303 7.4. Contribution from Smart Cities (regional, in ) 7.5. Contribution from Smart Cities (transnational, in ) 7.6. Staff resources Euro 135 945

8. Reporting framework How will the pilot report progress, both to local management and to the Smart Cities project? How will the pilot s timelines and reporting mechanisms link with reporting for the Smart Cities project? Established local indicators 8.1. Baselines/zero measuring What baselines do you have? Do you have evidence to how the pilot is need for this p Most services started with no digital services. 8.2. How will you measure progress? How will you show how your pilot is progressing? By monitoring the project by the indicators 8.3. How will you measure the impact of your pilot? e.g. increased citizen awareness/use of a service The use of the digitalised services 8.4. What local indicators will you use? e.g. surveys of local citizens, businesses See application 8.5. What national/transnational indicators will you use? e.g. levels of service use e-gov services created 8.6. What work-package/subtheme indicators will you use?

9. Pilot plan This should set out how the pilot will deliver the items set out in 4.3, including timelines for all deliverables and outputs. Not ready yet, but 2010 is a very work intensive year

10. Risks Set out the main risks the pilot faces and what steps you will take to manage these risks. The main risk in the project is having trouble in the disposition of local personnel and interest from management. Using the local steering committee as much and as strong as possible. What happens next When you have completed this document it needs to be approved by local stakeholders. A copy of the PID then needs to be uploaded to the Smart Cities wiki.