Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

LPA Programs How They Work

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Federal-Aid LPA Design Process Overview. MoDOT St. Louis District Local Programs

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

2016 Legislative Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES


Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

Section 6 Federal Programs

Understanding the. Program

Section 6 Federal Programs

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

On Ramps to the Regional Trail System Three Rivers Park District TAP Funding Proposal

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

Contents. FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Arkansas Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP-2015) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP-2015) Application Seminars

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET

LRSP PROJECT SUCCESSES & CHALLENGES

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (SRTS) U. S. Department of Transportation

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

Transportation Fund Sources Available to Units of Local Government

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year

Regional Transportation Investment Policy

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call

2018 Project Selection Process

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

2015 Five-Year County Highway and Bridge Improvement Plan Guide

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

City of Mount Rainier

June Planning & Programming Transportation Projects for the NOACA Region

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

Indiana LTAP. Local Government Asset Management and Pavement Preservation

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Economic Development Program

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Developing CMFs. Study Types and Potential Biases. Frank Gross VHB

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

CITY OF JOPLIN, MISSOURI

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2018 Budget. Joe Flynn, Secretary of Transportation House Appropriations Committee February 27, 2017

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

States Approaches to Transportation Project Prioritization

Lancaster County Smart Growth Transportation Program (Updated March 2017)

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

Appendix B Funding Sources

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Study Outreach Efforts... 3 Figure No. Description Page

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

HB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide:

Exhibit B. Plumas County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan SCOPE OF WORK

Highway Safety Improvement Program

Transportation Management Plan Overview

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Request for Proposal #15-07 Professional Engineering Services for Milwaukee Avenue Streetscape Improvements - Monroe Street to Greenwood Avenue

2015 call for projects draft application package

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Federal Funding & Project Administration 101. Presented By: Kyle Johnson, P.E. (Bolton & Menk) Dan Erickson, P.E. (Metro District State Aid Engineer)

L e t t e r o f I n t e r e s t : S t r u c t u r e s D e s i g n ( B r i d g e ) - S t a t e w i d e

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement

WISCONSIN DOT ALL ROADS NETWORK PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

Transcription:

Frequently Asked Questions Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP-S) 2019 Call for Projects If you have questions about the STP-S application process, scoring criteria, or anything else related to the STP-S Call for Projects, please check below to see if it has already been asked. We plan to update this list on a regular basis. If you don t find your question below, don t hesitate to give us a call at 314-421-4220 or 618-274-2750 or email us at stps@ewgateway.org. Q1: I do not see a number for logging back into the STP-S or CMAQ application. There is no project record number associated with the application as in prior years. This year, the application for both STP-S & CMAQ must be downloaded and completed on the applicant's computer. Q2: For the point ranges for cost: Are the points prorated down to 0%? And, if so, why would points be assessed to a project that doesn t need funding? If a project requested 0% federal funds, it would not be evaluated since it could be constructed outside the federal-aid program. Projects in the upper point ranges for cost (8.9% or less of adjusted construction funds in Illinois or 1.9% or less of total funds available in Missouri) are evaluated on a curve with the project with the lowest construction funds requested in Illinois or lowest total federal funds requested in Missouri receiving the full 20 points. Q3: We would like some further information as to how within community or outside community will be determined. Each project will receive a weighted average of the PEI cells it falls within. No buffer will be used in the analysis. Sponsors can request a PEI designation for each project until January 24th. Staff will respond within one week with the project scale. If the sponsor feels the PEI designation does not reflect the conditions of the area, they may submit a PEI Change Request Form. The change request is due by January 31st. Staff will respond within one week.

Q4: Who do I send a request for a letter of coordination if my project is on a transit route, impacts a Gateway Bike Plan route, or impacts a Great Rivers Greenway constructed facility? A letter of support is only required if there is: a. Transit impact - bus stop improvements are part of a project. b. Gateway Bike Plan/Great Rivers Greenway facility impact - bicycle facility is constructed (on- or off-road) as part of project in St. Charles County, St. Louis County, or St. Louis City. Send requests to: Bi-State Development/Metro - Lance Peterson, Director of Service Planning Madison County Transit District - S.J. Morrison, Director of Marketing and Planning St. Clair County Transit District - Ken Sharkey, Managing Director Great Rivers Greenway - Mark Vogl, Project Manager, Planning A transit letter is not required if the project does not include transit improvements. A Great Rivers Greenway letter is not required if the project does not include a bicycle facility that is located on a Gateway Bike Plan route or a bicycle facility which impacts a current Great Rivers Greenway route. Q5: Can you provide direction as to how points will be assigned from Table 4 in the STP-S scoring criteria when the federal cost is determined to be between 1.9% and 2.0%, 2.9% and 3.0%, etc. for Missouri projects? The scale is open-ended. Below are two tables showing the continuous scale for STP-S projects in Missouri and Illinois: Missouri Cost Points Scoring Ranges Federal Project Cost Range Point Range Min(x)% x < 2% 18.8 < x 20 2% x < 3% 14.8 < x 18.8 3% x < 4% 10.8 < x 14.8 4% x < 5% 6.8 < x 10.8 5% x < 10% 4.1 < x 6.8 10% x < 15% 2.8 < x 4.1 x 15% 0 Illinois Cost Points Scoring Ranges Adjusted Construction Cost Range Point Range Min(x)% x < 9% 17.4 < x 20 9% x < 11% 12.1 < x 17.4 11% x < 13% 8.1 < x 12.1 13% x < 16% 4.1 < x 8.1 16% x < 20% 1 < x 4.1 x 20% 0

Q6: When is the next TAP funding round? EWG has programmed all the TAP funds allocated to the region through the current federal transportation law which ends in 2020. Unfortunately, EWG will not hold another round of solicitations until the program is reauthorized by Congress. Q7: Can federal funds be used for local match? Federal funds are generally not allowed to be used for local match, with the exception of funds from Federal Land Management Agencies (such as the Forest Service or National Park Service) or HUD Community Development Block Grants. In all cases, confirm with MoDOT or IDOT prior to using any federal funds as local match. Q8: What is the difference between submitting a project as STP-S Traffic Flow vs. CMAQ? While the types of projects will likely be similar, the particular nature of the project may lead a sponsor to submit in one program rather than the other. For instance, while the focus of the CMAQ program is on reduced emissions, the focus of STP-S Traffic Flow is on system reliability/reduced delays, with emissions still accounted for, but given a smaller share of points. Additionally, a greater range of factors are taken into account with STP-S Traffic Flow, allowing a project to receive points for non-traffic flow aspects included in their project, such as improved safety, multimodal improvements, or freight significance. Any new roads or added through-lanes are ineligible for CMAQ funds, but eligible for STP-S. Q9: If your project includes sidewalk slab replacements, does that trigger Americans with Disabilities (ADA) compliance on the entire sidewalk within the project limits? Make sure to draft the scope of work so that it specifies what will be constructed. All new sidewalk must be ADA compliant. If the scope includes repairs to sections of sidewalk along the limits then ADA mandates that all the sidewalk be made ADA compliant. This will make your project costs escalate due to potential right of way acquisition. Q10: Are ADA transition plans required to submit an application? The ADA requires public agencies with 50 or more employees to have an ADA transition plan. EWG does not require a transition plan to apply for funds. Q11: There are no countermeasures included in my project. Should I still attach crash reports? If you are not including a safety countermeasure, crash reports are not required. In order to receive safety points, a countermeasure related to crashes or preventive countermeasure must be included in the project.

Q12: For the lifespan of my countermeasure on the Safety Supplement, do we have to use the service life given in the Safety Supplement? The IDOT Safety and Engineering Policy Memorandum (source of the lifespans on the Safety Supplement) is an excellent resource for the lifespan of different facility types, which both Illinois and Missouri sponsors should use to determine the lifespan of the countermeasure. However, if you have a different internal policy, or a different resource which you utilize to determine facility lifespan, you are free to use that. If you choose not to use the IDOT guide, please note the resource you use and either provide a copy of it or a link to it on the Safety application. Q13: The Safety Supplement asks for the maintenance costs for one year. Is this an average over the facility's lifetime? The Safety Supplement and application ask for the costs associated only with the maintenance of the countermeasure over one year. This should be the average yearly maintenance cost of the countermeasure over the course of its lifetime. Estimate the total cost of maintaining the countermeasure over its lifetime, then divide that by the number of years of the countermeasure's lifetime to get the average annual maintenance cost. Q14: Is it necessary to submit the Safety Supplement for all projects? The Safety Supplement is only necessary for Safety applications, in order to calculate the Benefit/Cost Ratio. For other project types, if a safety countermeasure is included in the project scope, only submit full crash reports for all fatal and serious injury crashes and up to 10 minor injury or property damage-only crashes that coincide with the proposed countermeasure. Q15: We feel our project should have a different PEI designation from what we received. What information should we provide on the PEI Change Request Form to justify this change? PEI designation is only used for road and bridge projects to determine whether a project is "within community" or "outside community." The Population & Employment Index (PEI) tells us the basics about the local context of a project, but it isn't exact. If you submit a designation request and disagree with the designation determined by the Index, you can send in a PEI Change Request Form. On the form, let us know of any issues that may impact walking and biking along the project limits that may not have been accounted for in the population and employment density data for the area. For example, if there are future developments planned nearby, geographical barriers, connections to existing facilities, a large attractor, a nearby transit facility, etc. these could all impact the amount of pedestrians and bicyclists utilizing a facility. Q16: What is the minimum amount of information that should be submitted with a preliminary application? Enough information must be provided for EWG reviewers to understand the project's scope, schedule, and financial plan. This information is all included in the application itself. However, the more information you provide in your preliminary application, the better able EWG will be to provide detailed comments.

Q17: The application asks for anticipated regular maintenance costs over the next 25 years. Should these be based on the cost to maintain the existing condition of the road if the project were not funded or future conditions after construction has been completed? Maintenance costs should be based on future conditions of the roadway after construction has been completed. Project sponsors should be considering maintenance costs early in the process and ensure they will be able to maintain any facilities constructed with federal funds. Q18: My local agency uses a pavement rating system other than PASER. Can we use that for our application instead? For consistency in reviewing project applications, all road conditions should be reported in terms of Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) ratings. Sponsors should report the PASER rating every 1/8 mile along the roadway (or 1/3 mile if the project is over 1 mile in length and outside a municipal boundary) using the Road Condition Evaluation Form provided on the STP-S Call for Projects webpage. Manuals detailing the PASER evaluation process are available at the links below: Asphalt: https://epd.wisc.edu/tic/publication/asphalt-paser-manual/ Concrete: https://epd.wisc.edu/tic/publication/concrete-paser-manual/ Q19: What is the amount of the project funding cap for CMAQ and STP-S? There is not a cap on the amount of CMAQ funds that can be requested by an individual project. For STP-S, a project in IL can request up to 20% of the adjusted construction funds available, while in MO, a project can request up to 15% of the total federal funds available. For the 2019 STP-S Call for Projects, the IL cap is $1,334,000 and the MO cap is $7,125,000. Q20: What is the current link to MoDOT LPA Basic Training? Missouri project sponsors are required to have an agency staff member who is certified under MoDOT's LPA Basic Training program. This training offers information on the Local Public Agency process. MoDOT has recently updated the link to this online training. Please use the new link: https://www.modot.org/lpa-basic-training-class-link. Q21: Where can I find out more information about ADA requirements? FHWA offers a Question and Answer on the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). You can review this information at the following link: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/civilrights/programs/ada/ada_sect504qa.cfm.