History of TANF Refinancing in Minnesota

Similar documents
TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) Background Information

December 15, 1995 No. 17

Figure 1: 17 States Will No Longer Receive TANF Supplemental Grants Beginning July 1, June 27, 2011

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Financing Issues

DC s TANF Program: The Basics

Summary TANF Provisions of The Budget Reconciliation Act of 2005 S. 1932, Title VII, Subtitle A, Sections 7101 through 7103

Maintenance of Effort Resource Material

Improving New York State's Utilization of its TANF Block Grant and Related "Maintenance of Effort" Resources

Medicaid and Block Grant Financing Compared

Revised Side-by-Side Comparison of Family Formation Provisions in TANF Reauthorization Legislation

The Arkansas TANF Program

Clarification on Characteristics of Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility Programs

Lessons from TANF: Block-Granting a Safety-Net Program Has Significantly Reduced Its Effectiveness

History of Medicaid shows the program s value in combating poverty and providing access to health

Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Waiver Programs

Human Services Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)

Housing HOME Program HUD $2.25 billion To be used for capital investments in Assure HPRP program staff

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services

The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Block Grant Legislation in the 114 th Congress

Understanding the Federal Economic Stimulus Legislation and the Expected Impact on Kentucky

SSI/SSP Grants in California: Key Context and Recent Trends

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

COSCDA Federal Advocacy Priorities for Fiscal Year 2008

The Tide Ahead: Upcoming Changes to Financial Aid. Midwestern Regional Forum February 2012

Business Development Competitive Grant Pilot Program

Abandoned Infants Assistance Act Social Services Block Grant (Title 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700

RECOMMENDATIONS REAUTHORIZATION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ON THE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) February 2002

APRIL TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services

Grants - Municipal Program

DHS Budget Cuts SFY 2017

HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary

Department of State Division of Library and Information Services LIBRARY COOPERATIVE GRANTS

Expenditures by Program Explore Minnesota Tourism 0 9,915 10,626 11,626 22,252. Full-Time Equivalents (FTE)

State $ Billion (23%) Federal $717.1 Billion (77%)

Federal Economic Stimulus Package

Continuing Certain Medicaid Options Will Increase Costs, But Benefit Recipients and the State

LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of. SUMMARY: The Secretary adopts as final, without change, the

WORKING P A P E R. Informing, Enrolling, and Reenrolling CalWORKs Leavers in Food Stamps and Medi-Cal JACOB ALEX KLERMAN AMY G.

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Funding for Housing, Health, and Social Services Block Grants Has Fallen Markedly Over Time

NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. A. Robert Kucab Executive Director

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Long-Term Care Services for the Elderly

Federal Pell Grant Program of the Higher Education Act: How the Program Works and Recent Legislative Changes

CAPITOL RESEARCH. Federal Funding for State Employment and Training Programs Covered by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act EDUCATION POLICY

Working Paper Series

Waivers in Medicaid Making Sense of the Options. Jeff Bontrager

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

The Minnesota Public Library Development Program. Report to The 1991 Minnesota Legislature. November 15, 1990

Information about how the county is pursuing its mission and goals is available in the county s Strategic Plan at ramseycounty.

Revised: November 2005 Regulation of Health and Human Services Facilities

California s Share of Federal Formula Grants:

Federal Government Shutdown Impacts to Florida

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

Texas Workforce Commission Summary of Recommendations - Senate

Did the Los Angeles Children s Health Initiative Outreach Effort Increase Enrollment in Medi-Cal?

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BIA/BIE CROSS-CUTTING SECTION

EMS and Trauma Systems Funding Programs House Committee on Public Health March 27, 2008

APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) FOR FISCAL YEAR

State law passed in 2000 to enable communities to supplement local revenue for dedicated purposes.

WHAT S IN THE F Y 2016 BUDGET FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING?

Food Stamp Program State Options Report

Food Stamps Caseload Distribution (FS)... 1

STATEMENT OF The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Testimony Robert E. O Connor, MD, MPH House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform June 22, 2007

budgetadvısory Overview Background April 2009 For schools, the ARRA provides resources in three primary categories:

Federal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana

Division of Workforce Development (477)

Chapter One. Overview of Title V and Title XIX

AESA Members FROM: Noelle Ellerson Ng, Director Federal Advocacy DATE: February 13, 2018 AESA Response to President Trump s Proposed FY18 Budget

Kitsap County Coordinated Grant Application Process 2019 Notice of Funding Availability

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL WORKFORCE

The Trump Budget s Massive Cuts to State and Local Services and Programs

The Opportunities and Challenges of Health Reform

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

Randall Chun, Legislative Analyst Revised: October Medical Assistance

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651) Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission

Pathway to Prosperity Success for TANF and WIOA Participants

WIOA: What Human Services Agencies and Advocates Need to Know

Statement of George D. Farr President and Chief Executive Officer Children's Medical Center of Dallas Dallas, Texas

Adult Education and Family Literacy Act: Major Statutory Provisions

Connecticut s Reliance on Federal Funds

HUMAN SERVICES AND EDUCATION

Food Stamp Program State Options Report

Five-Year Fiscal Forecast FY FY 2021

Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re Housing Program (HPRP) HPRP Guide to RFP Development and Contracting Issues

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Request for Applications (RFA) for Public Services and Housing Projects

(Area Agency Name) B. Requirements of Section 287, Florida Statutes: These requirements are herein incorporated by reference.

Department of Human Services

California s Current Section 1115 Waiver & Its Impact on the Public Hospital Safety Net

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Internal Control Pilot Project. State of Colorado. Financial Audit Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009

A Legacy of Failure: Millions of Children and Families Still Struggling A Critique of the President s FY2009 Budget Request

Long-Term Care Improvements under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Higher Education includes the University of California (UC), the California State

Agency Profile Agency Fiscal Page (Gov Rec) Change Summary... 10

Transcription:

INFORMATION BRIEF Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 600 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Danyell Punelli LeMire, Legislative Analyst 651-296-5058 July 2008 History of TANF Refinancing in Minnesota This information brief provides a description of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, including allowable state uses of TANF, and the history of TANF refinancing in Minnesota. Refinancing is any investment of TANF funds that does not increase programmatic activities for eligible low-income populations and replaces state general fund investments. Contents What is TANF?...2 Allowable State Uses of TANF...3 TANF Refinancing in Minnesota...4 Copies of this publication may be obtained by calling 651-296-6753. This document can be made available in alternative formats for people with disabilities by calling 651-296-6753 or the Minnesota State Relay Service at 711 or 1-800-627-3529 (TTY). Many House Research Department publications are also available on the Internet at: www.house.mn/hrd/hrd.htm.

History of TANF Financing in Minnesota Page 2 What is TANF? The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) entitlement program under the 1996 federal welfare reform law. 1 Under AFDC, each state received funding for recipients who met eligibility criteria set by the federal government. Federal funding in each state matched state program spending and varied from year to year depending on the number of recipient families. Under TANF, each state receives a fixed block grant of federal funds and may design its own program to assist needy families. The state program must meet federal statutory and regulatory guidelines, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) monitors states compliance with the requirements of the federal law. Federal welfare reform initially authorized block grants to the states for federal fiscal years 1997 to 2002. TANF was reauthorized through fiscal year 2010 as part of the federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. The TANF program continued to operate through a series of extensions from October 1, 2002, until enactment of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. Congress will need to reauthorize TANF for fiscal years beyond fiscal year 2010. Minnesota s annual TANF block grant amount is based on the actual AFDC payment to the state in federal fiscal year 1994. 2 Minnesota s current block grant is set at $263.4 million. In order to receive the federal block grant, each state must also spend its own resources, called a maintenance-of-effort (MOE), to provide assistance to needy families. With the new block grants came a five-year lifetime limit on assistance and work participation requirements. Individuals are generally limited to 60 months of benefits under TANF. In addition, states must meet work participation targets, or risk losing a portion of their block grants. The work participation targets require 50 percent of participants in single-parent households to be involved in work activities for at least 30 hours per week. The work participation target for two-parent households is for 90 percent of participants to be involved in work activities for at least 35 hours per week if federally funded child care assistance is not utilized. 3 A state that fails to meet these targets for TANF- or MOE-funded recipients risks losing a percentage of its block grant and also having its MOE requirement increased by the amount of the grant reduction. 1 The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (Pub. L. No.104-193) created TANF from a combination of most of the AFDC program (Maintenance Assistance, Emergency Assistance, and administration) and the JOBS program (employment services for AFDC recipients). The old AFDC/Transition Year child care program and the At-Risk child care programs were pulled out and put into the Child Care and Development Fund, which included a guaranteed child care funding stream and a capped funding stream that could be accessed by matching federal dollars. 2 Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30; federal fiscal year 2010 ends September 30, 2010. TANF block grant amounts to each state are equal to the 1994 or 1995 AFDC payment, or the average of AFDC expenditures from 1992 to 1994, whichever is highest. In Minnesota, the 1994 AFDC expenditure resulted in the highest TANF block grant. 3 The work participation requirement for two-parent families who utilize federally funded child care assistance is 55 hours per week (both parents combined).

History of TANF Financing in Minnesota Page 3 Decreasing caseloads from 1994 through 2001 allowed many states to expand the range of programs funded with TANF and to accumulate TANF reserves. The base year for the TANF block grant, 1994, came at the end of a weak recession. From 1994 through 2001, the nation experienced a robust economic expansion and welfare caseloads declined throughout the country as AFDC replacement programs emphasized work in exchange for benefits. In Minnesota, state and federal spending on cash grants in MFIP (Minnesota s welfare program) declined from $379 million in the 1994 base year to $288 million in state fiscal year 2005. Average monthly caseloads similarly declined from near 175,000 recipients in the mid-1990s to roughly 113,000 in fiscal year 2005. Caseloads increased in fiscal years 2002 and 2003 due to a recession before declining again in fiscal years 2004 through 2007. Caseloads are projected to decline slightly further in fiscal year 2008 before increasing again beginning in fiscal year 2009. With the fixed federal block grant and required state MOE funding, the decline in cash-grant spending has allowed the state to increase child care and employment-related benefits, accumulate a TANF reserve, and use provisions of the final federal regulations to fund a variety of programs besides the AFDC replacement program. 160,000 140,000 MFIP Monthly Average Recipients Average Recipients 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Fiscal Year * The monthly average recipients for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 are projected. Source: February 2008 Forecast, Department of Human Services

History of TANF Financing in Minnesota Page 4 Allowable State Uses of TANF As specified in the federal regulations that govern the TANF program, a state may use its TANF allocation to: (a) Provide assistance to needy families so that children may be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of relatives; (b) End the dependence of needy parents on government benefits by promoting job preparation, work, and marriage; (c) Prevent and reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies and establish annual numerical goals for preventing and reducing the incidence of these pregnancies; and (d) Encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families. (45 C.F.R. 260.20) States may also use TANF funds for spending on various programs that had been authorized prior to September 30, 1995, under Title IV A or IV F of the Social Security Act. 4 Also, a state may transfer up to 30 percent of its TANF block grant to either the Child Care and Development Block Grant or the Social Services Block Grant. However, no more than 10 percent of a block grant may be transferred to the Social Services Block Grant. TANF Refinancing in Minnesota Any investment of TANF funds that does not increase programmatic activities for eligible lowincome populations and replaces state general fund investments is considered refinancing. Minnesota has refinanced programs using TANF funds several times over the years. A significant amount of TANF was refinanced in fiscal years 2000 and 2001. There was a large TANF fund balance during the 1999 legislative session. In order to reduce the TANF fund balance, the legislature refinanced TANF on a one-time basis in fiscal years 2000 and 2001. Most of the TANF money that was refinanced replaced general fund spending on social services and child care assistance programs. According to the Department of Human Services, the 2000 and 2001 refinancing was done to maximize federal financial participation and to allow for a re-assessment of TANF in the welfare reform environment in the following biennium. More recently, this practice has been used during years in which there were budget shortfalls in order to help balance the budget. Table 1 provides information on TANF refinancing from 1998 to 2011. 4 Allowable uses include: MFIP cash assistance, emergency assistance, emergency assistance intensive family preservation services, certain employment and training programs, MFIP child care, transition year child care, and Basic Sliding Fee child care.

History of TANF Financing in Minnesota Page 5 Table 1 TANF Refinancings Benefiting the General Fund: State Fiscal Years 1998-2011 State Fiscal Year Total TANF Refinancing Total TANF Spending Percent of Total TANF Spending that was Refinanced TANF Fund Balance General Fund Balance (as of February forecast) 1998 $0 $186,050,000 - $118,517,000 $1,045,000,000 1999 0 187,071,000-198,813,000 1,235,000,000 2000 49,800,000 265,546,000 19% 207,496,000 800,000,000 2001 54,620,000 300,488,000 18 178,470,000 856,000,000 2002 12,315,000 321,847,000 4 126,668,000 (2,289,000,000) 2003 12,315,000 373,571,000 3 21,006,000 (11,000,000) 2004 4,092,000 261,032,000 2 40,885,000 (160,000,000) 2005 3,277,000 274,124,000 1 81,188,000 0 2006 7,979,000 276,760,000 3 81,626,000 88,000,000 2007 31,814,000 289,161,000 11 55,705,000 1,013,000,000 2008 24,486,000 261,197,000 9 58,942,000 (935,000,000) 2009 42,216,000 311,158,000 14 12,218,000 NA 2010 5,096,000 270,968,000 2 5,684,000 NA 2011 7,109,000 269,712,000 3 406,000 NA TOTAL $255,119,000 $3,848,685,000 7% - - Source: Departments of Human Services and Finance, June 2008 Note: Expenditures and TANF fund balances for fiscal years 2008-2011 are projected. Since federal regulations limit the allowable uses of TANF, only programs that meet the federal TANF requirements may be refinanced using TANF funds. Some of the programs that have been refinanced using TANF funds include the child care assistance programs; MFIP; working family credit; other social services programs, including Parents Fair Share, New Chance, and Functional Work Literacy; and housing and economic development programs, including Supportive Services Grants, Pathways, Rental Assistance for Family Stabilization, and Homelessness Prevention. See Table 2 for the amount of refinancing to various programs from 1998 to 2011.

History of TANF Financing in Minnesota Page 6 Table 2 TANF Refinancings Benefiting the General Fund: Detail (State Fiscal Years 1998-2011) State Fiscal Year Social Services Block Grant Child Care & Development Fund MFIP Cash Working Family Credit Other Social Services Housing & Economic Development Total TANF Refinancing 1998 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 15,140,000 27,985,000 0 0 1,175,000 5,500,000 49,800,000 2001 15,140,000 27,751,000 0 6,554,000 1,175,000 4,000,000 54,620,000 2002 11,140,000 0 0 0 1,175,000 0 12,315,000 2003 11,140,000 0 0 0 1,175,000 0 12,315,000 2004 140,000 0 3,952,000 0 0 0 4,092,000 2005 3,277,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,277,000 2006 140,000 6,692,000 0 0 0 1,147,000 7,979,000 2007 140,000 30,527,000 0 0 0 1,147,000 31,814,000 2008 140,000 3,192,000 21,154,000 0 0 0 24,486,000 2009 140,000 3,192,000 38,884,000 0 0 0 42,216,000 2010 140,000 3,192,000 1,764,000 0 0 0 5,096,000 2011 140,000 3,192,000 3,777,000 0 0 0 7,109,000 TOTAL $56,817,000 $105,723,000 $69,531,000 $6,554,000 $4,700,000 $11,794,000 $255,119,000 Source: Department of Human Services, June 2008 Notes: Expenditures for fiscal years 2008-2011 are projected. Expenditures not shown include base level Working Family Credit TANF expenditures, which represent investments in expanding the Working Family Credit and paying for the revenue lost when the child support pass-through was established (expansion began in FY 2001), expenditures to expand Basic Sliding Fee child care (expansion began in FY 1999) or Concurrent Permanency Planning (expansion began in FY 2002), and the time-limited Working Family Credit expenditures that have been used to fund low-income housing (expansion from FY 2000-2003). For additional information on the TANF program, see the information brief TANF Background or visit the human services area of our web site, www.house.mn/hrd/issinfo/hlt_hum.htm.