U.S. Army Robotics and Autonomous Systems Strategy Update

Similar documents
US Army Strategy for Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS)

UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES UPDATE

PROPONENT FOR THIS DOCUMENT:

Force 2025 and Beyond

National Defense Industrial Association Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Conference 9-11 May 2016

Victory Starts Here!

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

AUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI. Panel Topic Descriptions

Future Force Capabilities

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

Supporting the Army Warfighters Science and Technology Needs

US Army Combined Arms Center SOLDIERS AND LEADERS - OUR ASYMMETRIC ADVANTAGE. Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT

PEO GCS Unmanned Ground Vehicle Overview. Mr. Scott Davis, PEO GCS 23 March 2011

Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES O. BARCLAY III DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 BEFORE THE

Directorate of Training and Doctrine Industry Day Break out Session

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

Army Vision - Force 2025 White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Towards a Robotics Strategy

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing

Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2016 Automatic Injury Detection Technology Assessment 05 October February 2016 Battle Lab Report # 346

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)

August 2, Subject: Cancellation of the Army s Autonomous Navigation System

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JOHN M. MURRAY DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 AND

Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

38 th Chief of Staff, U.S. Army

Future Combat Systems

Army Equipment Modernization Strategy Versatile and Tailorable, yet Affordable and Cost Effective

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

A Common Interface Language For U nm anned System s Technology to the Warfighter Quicker

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Chapter 1. Introduction

DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World

MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

2018 Army Signal Conference

TWV Conference Autonomous Vehicle Technology Panel

White Paper. Subject: Science and Technology Lines of Effort for a Future Expeditionary Army

MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Sustainment

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED/ AFCEA Alamo Chapter. MG Garrett S. Yee. Acting Cybersecurity Director Army Chief Information Officer/G-6. June 2017 UNCLASSIFIED

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY DR. MIKE GRIFFIN UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING BEFORE THE

Ground Robotics Update Presented at the Congressional Robotics Caucus Kick-Off Lunch

Retaining Lethality Overmatch Through Science & Technology

AMRDEC UPDATE. Date: February 7, Dr. Juanita M. Harris, SES. IAW DoD Directive , insert appropriate distribution statement

PLAN. U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command CECOM VISION CECOM MISSION

US Army/AMRDEC S&T Overview

Aviation Branch Update

James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright. Meg Williams

Project Manager Munitions Executive Summit

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Emerging Nuclear Detection Technologies in the Department of Defense

System Simulation, Software & Integration Directorate Realignment

USMC Small Arms Modernization Brief

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

TCM ABCT Breakout Session 2018 AUSA Chattahoochee Valley/Fort Benning and MCoE Industry Day April 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #208

COMMITMENT. & SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do. MUM-T for the Abrams Lethality Enabler UNPARALLELED

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

Soldier Division Director David Libersat June 2, 2015

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

AFCEA Mission Command Industry Engagement Symposium

Ammunition Enterprise Cross-Service Update

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

CLASSES/REFERENCES TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE

NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATION OPENING REMARKS

Tactical Technology Office

AUSA ILW LANPAC 2018 Forum 2: Industry Multi-Domain Operations in the Pacific

LOE 1 - Unified Network

America s Army Reserve Ready Now; Shaping Tomorrow

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

TRADOC Pamphlet This page intentionally left blank

3 rd Annual Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Summit

Transcription:

U.S. Army Robotics and Autonomous Systems Strategy Update 16 November 2015 Army Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) 1

The Robotics Strategy (RAS) Concept Development Path 1. Innovative technologies are new and disruptive (e.g. the airplane in 1914, the tank in 1917, nuclear weapons in 1945). Technological innovation often backs us up into suddenly needing a concept of employment. Robotics fits squarely in this category. 2. The Chief of Staff of the Army, GEN Ray Odierno provided guidance in 2013 for TRADOC to pursue opportunities for innovation rather than traditional evolutionary methods of transformation. His instructions clearly articulated his desire to integrate robotics across the entire Army- not just engineer units and counter-ied efforts. 3. Specific to urgency and effort, in May 2014, GEN Odierno expressed doubt the Army could wait until 2025 to get RAS technologies into formations and asked for costs, assessments, and personnel situations associated with expediting their fielding. Key Point: Senior Leader Emphasis Often Changes Things Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS) Strategy 2015-2040 CSA 2013 Guidance on Army Innovation Aug 2014 UGV/UAS CSA Infopaper Oct 2014 Army Operating Concept Army RAS Concept (TBD) 2

New Supporting Army TRADOC Documents TRADOC Pam 525-3-1, Appendix C-2. Army science and technology investment areas Technologies will.enable manned and unmanned teaming in both air and ground maneuver though investments in scalable sensors, scalable teaming, Soldier-robot communication, and shared understanding through advancements in machine learning. Technologies will exist to improve the autonomy of unmanned systems. These technologies will enable unmanned cargo delivery via air and enable robots to be a part of the squad to reduce and lighten Soldier loads. Investments in micro autonomous air and ground systems will also enhance platoon, squad, and Soldier situational awareness. 3

Why a RAS Strategy is Needed TRADOC s 2014 Robotics Research Study confirmed the utility of RAS systems based on 14 years of war; RAS platforms provide vital human stand-off from dull, dirty, and dangerous tasks Most RAS procured through OCO funding; as an enduring capability, the Army must transition to programs of record The Army Operating Concept lists RAS as an enduring capability that will: Reduce risk to Soldiers and units Provide opportunities for increased efficiencies Provide differential advantages over U.S. adversaries The Army is developing a strategy to deliver RAS capabilities, rather than a spend plan to buy things. This effort is similar to its approved Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy. 4

The RAS Strategy Purpose: Articulate a strategy that will: Align and prioritize robotics and autonomous systems requirements across all formations Describe operational employment of RAS in Force 2025 and Beyond Integrate RAS as an increase in capability and a key to the Army s differential advantage over adversaries Vision: RAS capabilities for expeditionary maneuver with forces that can: See and fight across extended distances Share situational awareness and promote operational understanding across all echelons Operate widely dispersed while maintaining mutual support Gain and maintain contact with the enemy to set favorable battlefield conditions Sustain high tempo operations at the end of extended and contested lines of communication Establish and maintain security across wide areas and pose enemy forces with multiple dilemmas while reducing risk to Soldiers and units RAS must enable Army formations to retain overmatch, support expeditionary and joint combined Victory Starts arms Here! maneuver, and enable Army forces to win in unified land operations 5

Ends: Enduring Strategic Focus Ensure Army formations possess appropriate combinations of mobility, protection, lethality, and situational awareness to overmatch adversaries and win in a complex world Ways: What we must do to modernize Required Activities (SIDRA) Sustain: existing robotic capabilities, and integrate into Army formations Improve: incremental upgrades to robotic and autonomous systems (RAS) capabilities, technological insertions, interoperability, and implement life cycle strategies Develop: new RAS capabilities and technologies to enable joint combined arms maneuver, ensure interoperability, and increase overmatch in each formation Replace: obsolete RAS with new systems at a rate that effectively mitigates risk Assess: continuously reexamine assumptions, evaluate capability effectiveness in terms of mobility/protection/lethality through experimentation and research, refine solutions and address risk 6

SIDRA Planning Sustain (and Integrate) Field the current fleet of tele-operated OEF/OIF- era UGVs and remotely piloted UAS Implement programs of record for larger RAS (e.g. M-160, Husky Mine Detection System, Route Clearance Interrogation System) Recapitalize older tele-operated robots to address fleet age Improve Upgrade platforms and common controllers, software, and payload capabilities Upgrade and field autonomous technologies Refine ground and air manned and unmanned teaming (MUM-T) capabilities Refine acquisition and management of smaller RAS as short-term programs of record Develop Develop leader-follower tactical wheeled vehicle capability and semi-autonomous capabilities Develop combat platforms destined for far term autonomous functions Develop Robotic Squad Member and Artificial Intelligence augmented networks Replace Replace Non-Standard Equipment systems with new Programs of Record Replace appliqué autonomous robotic systems with fully autonomous platforms Replace Manned Systems with Unmanned Systems Assess Examine formations and RAS requirements in order to transition RAS into team members Victory Starts Ensure Here! limited DoD investment delivers maximum return for the Warfighter 7

Framing the Plan in Three Phases As the Army articulates RAS integration across multiple Warfighting Functions, this vision must also show realistic objectives in the near-term, feasible objectives in the mid-term, and visionary objectives for the far-term. Beginning with near-term objectives, each successive phase links its objectives to and builds from the achievements of the previous phase. Near-Term Vision- Adapt Mid-Term Objectives: Technologies improve the autonomy of unmanned systems Technologies will enable unmanned cargo delivery Robots act as teammates rather than tools Micro autonomous air and ground systems will also enhance Platoon, Squad, and Soldier situational awareness Mid-Term Vision (F2025)- Evolve Near-Term Objectives: Leader-Follower Convoy Technology Employment Lighten the Soldier load Enhance stand-off from threats and improve situational awareness Far-Term Objectives: Technologies will enable manned and unmanned teaming in both air and ground maneuver though investments in scalable sensors, scalable teaming, Soldier-robot communication, and shared understanding through advancements in machine learning. Source for All Listed Objectives: TRADOC Pam 525-3-1, Army Operating Concept, Appendix C-2. Far-Term Vision- Innovate 8

Strategic Capability Progression Maturation, Integration, and Demonstration Synergistic Unmanned-Manned Intelligent Teaming (SUMIT) (2020-2025) Unmanned Air Systems Autonomy (2020) 2030 Dynamic Force & Mission Autonomy (2030-2040+) 2040 Combined Arms Maneuver (2030-2035) Active Safety Driver Assist Appliqué Kits (2015) 2020 Extend the Reach of the Warfighter (2020) Autonomous Convoy Operations (2020-2025) 2015 9

Robotics Strategy Development Timeline Development Participants: ARCIC MCOE TRADOC G-2 MSCoE SCoE MCCoE ICoE F2025 HQDA G-3/5/7 HQDA G-8 ASA(ALT) RDECOM CERDEC PEO-CS/CSS ARL, NRL, AFRL NASA-JPL Outside Studies JCRAST Gray Beard Advisors External Events: NIE 16.1 NIE 16.2 AEWE Spirals JCRAS Efforts 21July 15 2-3 June-------- Prelim Writing Conference and F2025 Update 19 May ------ POAM brief to CG TRADOC AUG 15 OCT 15 NOV 15 Jan- Mar 16 22-26 June 15 ------- Primary Core Writing Team Conference Read Ahead Work 10 June -------- Improved Draft of RAS Concept and Initial Annexes to Dir, ARCIC ---Updated Draft with final edits and inform other team efforts 13 July 15 ----Improved Draft of RAS Concept and Annexes to Dir, ARCIC 7-10 July 15 ------- Primary Core Writing Team Conference, Update Dir ARCIC 3 Jul 15 ------- Updated Draft and Annexes to Joint Concept RAS Team J7/J8 Apr/May -----Beginning Draft, Shared w/ Joint Concept RAS Team J7/J8 AUG 15 ------- Updated Draft and Annexes to Joint Concept Team ---Updated Draft out for review with Academia/Industry ----CSA Force 2025 Update OCT 16 ---Army Warfighting Assessments (AWA)17.1 --Publish Final Concept and Revised Strategy and Execution Orders --- Input to Army Warfighting Assessment (AWA) Internal Events Routine touch points for editing Senior Leader Events Major Upcoming Events Completed Events 10

Summary RAS provide the Army with differential advantages over adversaries The Army Robotics and Autonomous Systems Strategy will: Provides near, mid, and far-term capabilities with realistic and feasible objectives Focus near-term capabilities to enable the Soldier Focus mid-term capabilities to improve the unit capabilities and manned-unmanned teaming Scope far-term capabilities to improve operations and achieve transformative capabilities Prioritize rapid fielding of mature robotic technologies into the hands of the Warfighter Army Warfighting Assessments will inform RAS development efforts 11