Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Similar documents
Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

ASEAN Strategic Action Plan for SME Development ( )

Terms of Reference Approved 30 April 2015/ Revised 29 September 2016

2012/SMEMM/010 Agenda Item: 2.4. SMEWG Chair Report. Purpose: Information Submitted by: SMEWG Chair

Topic Question Page. 30 How are Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) handled? 6

STDF MEDIUM-TERM STRATEGY ( )

Encouraging Innovation and Growth

SEAI Research Development and Demonstration Funding Programme Budget Policy. Version: February 2018

Annex to the. Steps for the implementation

1. (Safe) Concept development 2. Proposal: Designing measures to maximise impact 3. Case Study IP at the proposal development stage 4.

Innovation Voucher Frequently Asked Questions: April 2017 INNOVATION VOUCHERS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

R&D and innovation performance: Polish perspective

Call for Proposals Collaborative Data Innovations for Sustainable Development

Market Discovery Fund

Call for Ideas 2017 To identify and demonstrate disruptive space innovations based on ideas and concepts

WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS

Fact Sheet How to manage IP in FP7 during and after the project

Investment, Enterprise and Development Commission Sixth session High-Level Segment on Youth Entrepreneurship for Development.

Valuating intellectual property in innovation support. OSEO s experience

Netherlands. Development. Organisation

Incentive Guidelines Research and Development - Tax Credits INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PROJECTS; EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Payments Enterprise Ireland Payments 8 Company Payments 8 Eligible Costs 9

Finance and Training Workshop for RECP SMEs

COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD)

ICT-enabled Business Incubation Program:

Annex 1: Conceptual Framework of the Swiss- Bulgarian Cooperation Programme

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

WORK PROGRAMME 2012 CAPACITIES PART 2 RESEARCH FOR THE BENEFIT OF SMES. (European Commission C (2011)5023 of 19 July)

Recent Developments in Global IP Protection Systems and their Advantages for Developing Countries

Request for Proposal. Consulting Opportunity for Intellectual Property Public Education and Awareness (Phase II) [AANZ-0057-IP-09]

Disability Research Grant Program

HEAR MORE AT A FREE ANGELS AND GOVERNMENT FUNDING SEMINAR

The European Investment Bank in Africa, the Caribbean and Pacific Business Strategy

The Interface between Universities Public Research Institutions and SMEs

DEFINITION OF PHILANTHROPIC FUNDING. Identifying philanthropic funds. Sources of philanthropic funds. To be followed by all University staff

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME PART 3. (European Commission C (2011) 5023 of 19 July 2011) REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

BRIDGING GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2018

Support for Applied Research in Smart Specialisation Growth Areas. Chapter 1 General Provisions

INNOVATION POLICY FOR INCLUSIVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ARAB REGION

FP6. Specific Programme: Structuring the European Research Area. Work Programme. Human Resources and Mobility

THE WORLD BANK EXPERIENCE ON RESEARCH & INNOVATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

FIT15 plus - research, innovation, and technology promotion for Vienna

d. authorises the Executive Director (to be appointed) to:

Status of the GCF portfolio: pipeline and approved projects

Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

HORIZON 2020 WORK PROGRAMME

R&D Tax Relief - The Essentials. 4 Minute Read

Incentive Guidelines Network Support Scheme (Assistance for collaboration)

Innovation Grant Guide for Applicants

CAPACITIES PROVISIONAL 1 WORK PROGRAMME 2007 PART 2. (European Commission C(2006) 6849) RESEARCH FOR THE BENEFIT OF SMES

The Present State of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Russia

Call for the expression of interest Selection of six model demonstrator regions to receive advisory support from the European Cluster Observatory

Guidelines for the Application to the Science, Technology and Innovation Transform Fund (IsDB-STIF)

Call for Proposals Building Research Capacity in Least Developed Countries

SMEs in developing countries with special emphasis on OIC Member States, and policy options to increase the competitiveness of SMES

Supporting Research in Commercial Enterprises Brazil

Outline BACKGROUND. WHY do businesses apply to the MSCA? WHAT opportunities do the MSCA offer? WHICH MSCA is made for you? PRACTICAL information

U.S. Trade and Development Agency Proposal and Budget Model Format

An initiative of Dubai Plan 2021

Call for seed money grants with Switzerland 2018

JPO s Experience in Promoting Intellectual Property (IP) and Cooperative Activities with African Countries

2017 SURVEY OF ENTREPRENEURS AND MSMES IN VIETNAM

Stocktaking of Activities relevant to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)

Funding Opportunities with the Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF) Guidance Note for Applicants

ABMU Health Board Research and Development Strategy

Pre-Budget Submission. Canadian Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing SME Global Competitiveness

See above. No. No. Yes.

The Argentine Matching Grant Program Results and Lessons Learned

Status of the Fund s portfolio: pipeline and approved projects

Terms of Reference For Cholera Prevention and Control: Lessons Learnt and Roadmap 1. Summary

«Envisioned. Created. Protected.» The SME-IP Project of the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property

Guidelines for the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security

INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND TECHNOLOGY (ICT) BASED BUSINESS INCUBATION PROGRAM - KENYA TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT

Enterprise Development Fund. Purpose and Process. July 2012

Internationalisation of SMEs Enterprise Europe Network

with the Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF) for Republic of Chile 16 March 2017 Entity Support & Strategic Frameworks

TERMS OF REFERENCE (ToR) FOR NATIONAL AGRO- PROCESSING FORUM

Terms of Reference for the production of a Brand Visual Identity Manual for the Nigerian National Accreditation Body

The role of national development banks un fostering SME access to finance

Follow-up of the report of the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination

ICC/WTO Small Business Champions

REG: Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program

Call for Submission of Proposals

Global strategy and plan of action on public health, innovation and intellectual property

APEC Food Safety Cooperation Forum

ONTARIO S FIRST CHIEF SCIENCE OFFICER

Collaborating for Success Working with Research Organisations

(SME s) Access to Finance, Going Forward Strategy

EU Risk Assessment Agenda: Funding opportunities across the EU and its Member States

Appointment of Experts of the Independent Technical Advisory Panel

GOOD PRACTICE. XPANDE / SICOMEX PROGRAMMES (Support Programmes for SME Internationalization)

ICC policy recommendations on global IT sourcing Prepared by the Commission on E-Business, IT and Telecoms

Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of PEI

Call for mobility grants with South Asia and Iran, Q1 2018

María del Coriseo González Izquierdo

International Benchmarking of Countries Policies and Programs Supporting SME Manufacturers BY STEPHEN J. EZELL AND DR. ROBERT D.

Technology Bank for the Least Developed Countries

RAPIDE - Action Groups

Transcription:

E CDIP/12/6 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2013 Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) Twelfth Session Geneva, November 18 to 21, 2013 PILOT PROJECT ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) AND DESIGN MANAGEMENT FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING AND LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES (LDCS) prepared by the Secretariat 1. The Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP), at its eleventh session held in May 2013, considered a Project Proposal from the Republic of Korea on Intellectual Property (IP) and Design Management for Business Development in Developing and Least Developed Countries (LDCs), contained in document CDIP/11/7. The Committee requested the Secretariat to work together with the Republic of Korea to further develop this proposal into a CDIP project document and present it at its twelfth session. 2. Accordingly, by a way of communication dated October 10, 2013, addressed to the Secretariat, the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Korea has submitted the revised project proposal entitled Pilot Project on Intellectual Property (IP) and Design Management for Business Development in Developing and Least Developed Countries (LDCs), for consideration of the twelfth session of the CDIP. 3. The above-mentioned communication of the Republic of Korea, together with its enclosures, is contained in the Annex of this document. 4. The CDIP is invited to consider and approve the Annex to this document. [Annex follows]

ANNE

Annex, page 2 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATIONS 4 AND 10 PROJECT DOCUMENT 1. SUMMARY Project Code DA_4_10_02 Title Pilot Project on Intellectual Property (IP) and Design Management for Business Development in Developing and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Development Agenda Recommendation(s) Recommendation 4: Place particular emphasis on the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and institutions dealing with scientific research and cultural industries and assist Member States, at their request, in setting up appropriate national strategies in the field of intellectual property. Recommendation 10: To assist Member States to develop and improve national intellectual property institutional capacity through further development of infrastructure and other facilities with a view to making national intellectual property institutions more efficient and promote a fair balance between intellectual property protection and the public interest. This technical assistance should also be extended to sub-regional and regional organizations dealing with intellectual property. Brief Description of Project The project aims at supporting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs), which actively create and commercialize designs, in the active use of the IP system and the development of strategies that will encourage investment in design. Through close cooperation with lead agencies in the participating countries, the project will promote the strategic use of Intellectual Property rights, in particular, industrial design rights, by SMEs in those countries, thereby encouraging a pro-active approach to design protection in domestic and export markets. The project is based on a proposal presented by the Republic of Korea at the eleventh session of the CDIP (document CDIP/11/7). Elements of the original proposal as well as new elements intending to respond to comments made at the 11 th session of the CDIP are addressed by this project document. Implementing Program(s) Program 2 Links to other related Program(s)/ DA Project(s) Links to WIPO Programs 2, 9, 30 and 31.

Annex, page 3 Links to Expected Results in the Program and Budget Project Duration Expected Result III.2. Enhanced human resource capacities able to deal with the broad range of requirements for the effective use of IP for development in developing countries, LDCs and countries with economies in transition. 24 months. Project Budget Total non-personnel costs for the project: 250.000 CHF. Estimation of human resources requirements: One project officer at level P2 - P3 level (237.000 Swiss francs).

Annex, page 4 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. Introduction to the issue Increasingly products are enjoying prestige and international recognition due to their design characteristics. In many cases, products benefit from the strategic use of design as an Intellectual Property Right (IPR). A design strategy adds value to the product, helps raise its market demand and increases economic return for its producers. However, developing countries and LDCs face specific and common challenges, many of which are related to effective design awareness and a need for building and strengthening capacities for management and protection of designs. The proposed project will cover the development of concrete strategies including the offering of assistance, starting with the identification of SMEs that actively develop and use designs, and covering the entire design protection process from application to registration. Where industrial design registration does not appear to be the preferred solution, alternative ways of IP protection will be explored. Such strategies can be a key factor in raising the capability of SMEs to protect and manage design rights, while raising public awareness of the issue. 2.2. Objectives Addressing Development Agenda Recommendations 4 and 10, the project aims to achieve the following general objective and more specific objectives. General objective: To contribute to two countries economic development by reinforcing their national IPR design protection mechanism strategy and use by SMEs, resulting in an increase of investments in design allowing a higher turnover of participating SMEs. This project aims at a national longterm impact and at possible replication in other Member States. Specific objectives: To contribute to the business development of SMEs in participating countries by encouraging investment in design through the strategic use of IPR, in particular the proactive use of appropriate design protection mechanisms that were neglected so far; To improve the capacities of national design institutions, including IP Offices, to encourage the strategic use of the IP system for design producing businesses, thus leading to an increased use of available design protection mechanisms. 2.3. Delivery Strategy The project will be implemented in two countries with a view to develop a design strategy for design businesses in each of them.

Annex, page 5 Member States interested in participating in the project will be required to analyze their current situation with regard to design protection, especially concerning design registrations by residents and the potential use of the design registration system by resident design businesses. Interested Member States will be required to designate a national lead agency, for example the industrial property office, or a government agency or representative industry organization with a mandate for supporting design, which should formulate a project proposal that will provide information on the following questions: (a) Existence of design based industries or manufacturers in the country; State of design protection institutions and legislative framework and infrastructure; Actual need to support design businesses in developing IP strategies and obtaining active IP protection for their designs in national and international markets; and Potential for taking over and continuing the project after completion of initial project as well as for replication in other Member States. The project components will build on each other for effectiveness and sustainability. In particular, the following tasks and activities will be carried out to achieve the above project objectives: (a) Development of Design Strategies: The project objectives will be achieved through the development of strategies for securing IP design rights. Based on individual project proposals, two countries from different geographical regions will be selected for the implementation of the project over two years. The lead agency in the selected country will be required to designate a local project manager who will work with the WIPO Secretariat in elaborating an outreach plan, which will be used during the first year of the project to identify design businesses that have potential for participating in the project with a view to protect their designs nationally and, if applicable, overseas. Each key stage of the project should include an agreement on a strategy and an implementation plan, as well as change management factors, risk analysis and mitigation. During the course of the second year, the project will identify one or several design experts who will assist the selected businesses to formulate IP strategies and protection plans for relevant designs. The lead agency will assist the selected businesses in obtaining design protection and facilitate the promotion of the protected designs in relevant national and international business circles. (b) Awareness Raising and Capacity Building: The awareness raising objective will be notably achieved through documenting experiences obtained in the process of implementing this project and sharing experiences. This could for instance be achieved by way of a conference with the participating lead agency and selected design businesses at the conclusion of the project. Based on the experience gained during the two-year duration of the project, the lead agency will be expected to continue its activities subsequent to the ending of the second year of the project. Key factors for the project to achieve long-term impact, such as ensuring capacity building resources, will be included in the initial project framework.

Annex, page 6 3. REVIEW AND EVALUATION 3.1. Project Review Schedule The progress of the project in participating countries will be reviewed for a first time after one year with a view to establish that an outreach plan was elaborated and put into practice and a number of potentially participating design businesses were identified. Another review will take place at the end of the second year involving the designated lead agency, local project manager as well as participating design businesses with a view to evaluate the overall implementation of the project. 3.2. Project Self-Evaluation Project Outputs Indicators of Successful Completion (Output Indicators) Participating countries selected (a) Two countries selected (decision based on selection criteria) IPR design protection mechanism for design businesses developed at the country level (a) National design protection strategy developed; (b) Designation of national project managers and national lead agency according to selection criteria; (c) Identification of national experts to assist, if necessary, in the development of individual design protection plans. Outreach plan at the country level developed (a) Outreach strategy in place and main actors identified. (b) One or several businesses per participating countries that produce original design identified (decision in accordance with selection criteria). Design protection plan with businesses developed (a) Design protection plan agreed with the business(es); (b) Number and relevance of designs per business that could be the object of a design protection strategy (selection with the support of national expert(s)). Implementation of proactive design protection through appropriate protection mechanisms in domestic and, where applicable international markets. Outreach to relevant national and international markets. (a) Number of applications for design registration initiated and/or filed and/or number of other relevant legal protection titles obtained; (a) Presence of participating businesses in national or international specialized trade fairs (plus outreach through other canals to be defined).

Annex, page 7 Project Objective(s) To contribute to the business development of SMEs in participating countries by encouraging investment in design through the strategic use of IPR, in particular the proactive use of appropriate design protection mechanisms that were neglected so far. To improve the capacities of national design institutions, including IP Office, to encourage the strategic use of the IP system for design producing businesses thus leading to an increased use of available design protection mechanisms. Indicator(s) of Success in Achieving Project Objective (Outcome Indicators) (a) Number of protected designs (through registration or otherwise) per business (to be measured sometime after the completion of the project) (b) Turnover of SMEs using design protection prior and after the project (to be measured sometime after the completion of the project) (c) Level of satisfaction of participating businesses with the implementation of the design protection plan. (a) Number and type of capacity building related activities for design businesses conducted by the national design institution; (b) Number and type of promotional activities conducted by the national design institution.

Annex, page 8 4. IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE Activities Quarters 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Hiring a Project Manager and selecting two participating countries. Identification of a Lead Agency in each participating country and designating local project managers. Designing and implementing national outreach plans in order to identify participating domestic design businesses Selection of domestic design businesses eligible to participate in the project Analysis of design portfolios of participating design businesses and formulating an appropriate strategy for acquiring Intellectual Property rights covering the relevant designs domestically and, if applicable, internationally Initiating and prosecuting applications for design registration/design patent grants as appropriate; formalizing alternative design protection strategies as appropriate. Review project progress for participating businesses and organization of a round-up event involving all project partners. Holding of the round-up event and planning the project s extension to design businesses to countries or Member States with potential for replicating the project.

Annex, page 9 5. PROJECT BUDGET (non-personnel) (Swiss francs) Travel and Fellowships Contractual Services Activities Hiring a project manager & selecting two participating countries. Staff Missions 10.000 Third-party Travel Publishing Individual Contractual Services Other Contractual Services Total Identification of lead agencies. Designating local project managers. Designing & implementing national outreach plans to identify participating design businesses 10.000 35.000 Selection of design businesses to participate in the project 20.000 Analysis of design portfolios of participating design businesses and formulating a strategy for acquiring IPRs Initiating and prosecuting applications for design registration/ design patent grants; formalizing alternative design protection strategies as appropriate. 30.000 45.000 50.000

Annex, page 10 (Swiss francs) Travel and Fellowships Contractual Services Total Review project progress for participating businesses and organizing a round-up event involving all project partners. Round-up event and planning the Project s extension to more design businesses to countries or Member States with potential for replicating the project. 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 Total 30.000 30.000 10.000 170.000 10.000 250.000

Annex, page 11 PROJECT BUDGET (personnel resources) One Short Term Professional at P2 - P3 level (Swiss Francs) 2014 2015 Total 118,500 118,500 237,000 Total 118,500 118,500 237,000 Project Budget by Cost Category and Year (non-personnel resources) Cost Category Budget (Swiss Francs) 2014 2015 Total Travel and Fellowships Staff Missions 15,000 15,000 30,000 Third-party Travel 15,000 15,000 30,000 Contractual Services Publishing 5,000 5,000 10,000 Individual Contractual 85,000 85,000 170.000 Services [1] Other Contractual Services 5,000 5,000 10,000 Total 125,000 125,000 250,000 [End of Annex and of document] [1] 10,000 Swiss francs are earmarked for the independent evaluation at the end of the project.