FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS I-495 & I-270 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Program

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

Click to edit Master title style

Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Route 3 South Managed Lanes Project DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

TRB/AASHTO Environment & Energy Research Conference June 6-9, 2010 Session 47: Lessons Learned from P3 Public Involvement Initiatives

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

City of Seattle Partnering Agreement. December 2017

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

Public Private Partnerships and Transit Not Just for Mega Projects Karin DeMoors October 28, 2015

PROJECT DELIVERY MODELS ARKANSAS PLANNING RETREAT ON P3S. J. Douglas Koelemay, Director October 7, 2015

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

Smart Region Smart Transportation

PARTNERSHIPS ACCELERATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & JOB CREATION. J. Douglas Koelemay, Director

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

George Washington Region Scenario Planning Study Phase II

Overview of the Procurement and Project Milestones

Transit Operations Funding Sources

REGIONAL TRAVEL TRENDS

I-66 Inside the Beltway Initial Traffic Analysis and Framework Agreement

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

November 4, 2013 Office of Transportation Public Private Partnerships

A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES

Build America Transportation Investment Center. Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Fort Meade Regional Growth Management Committee BRAC TDM. Vanpool Boot Camp

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Puget Sound Gateway Program

May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

Early Scoping Report Appendix Attachment B-5:

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

FY 2018 Application Support Guide

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) and Early Action Plan

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

For additional information about ACT please contact: ACT National Headquarters phone: PO Box facsimile:

May 22, Pamela Bailey-Campbell. Vice President - North America Infrastructure Consultancy Jacobs Engineering, Inc.

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018

Highway and Light Rail Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S.: Protecting the Public Interest

Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing

Florida s Future: Funding Growth Through Public Private Partnerships. Ed Turanchik. March 10, 2014

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

HB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide:

Federal Tolling & Pricing Programs: MAP-21 Changes

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Executive Summary

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

UBER: DRIVING UPSTATE JOBS New York State Economic Impact Report

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Update on Transportation Funding and Potential Sources for Additional Revenue. June 19, 2017

REGIONAL TRANSIT FEASIBILITY PLAN

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

North Carolina Turnpike Authority Joint Appropriations Committee on Transportation Beau Memory & Rodger Rochelle

Financing Transit Projects with Traditional and Innovative Sources And Mechanisms

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

An Analysis of the Evolution of the Public-Private Transportation Act of 1995

Regional Measure 3. Citizens Advisory Committee Agenda Item 12. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY February 14, 2017

Puget Sound Gateway Program

ITEM 12 - Information March 18, 2015

The Maryland Transportation Authority has. Staff Approve Resolution R to amend the FY TIP.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS. Classification & Documentation

S E N A T E F I S C A L O F F I C E I S S U E B R I E F 2016-S RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016

NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY

RESOLUTION ADOPTINGPRINCIPLES AND APPROVING A LIST OF CANDIDATE PROJECTS AND FUNDING REQUESTS FOR REGIONAL MEASURE 3

The Future of the Federal Role in Transportation

Funding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

Urban Partnership Communications Plan

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2018 Budget. Joe Flynn, Secretary of Transportation House Appropriations Committee February 27, 2017

Transit-Oriented Development and Land Use Subarea Plan for Central Lake Forest Park

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

SOUTH FLORIDA COMMUTER SERVICES CONTRACT SCOPE OF SERVICES

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

Valley Regional Transit Strategic Plan

Commissioner Partridge turned the meeting over to Commissioner Mark Waller to make a few comments.

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Department of Transportation Governor s FY 2015 and FY 2016 Recommendations. Department of Transportation

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

Innovative Project Finance

To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

Long Range Transportation Plan

Interstate Tolling for Wisconsin: Why and How

SURVEY REPORT. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board STATE OF THE COMMUTE. From the Metropolitan Washington DC Region

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

Transcription:

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS I-495 & I-270 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Program What is the P3 Program and where is it happening? This P3 Program is the largest initiative of Governor Hogan s Traffic Relief Plan. It includes improvements for more than 70 miles of interstate in Maryland, including: I-495 from south of the American Legion Bridge (Virginia side) to east of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Maryland side) and I-270 from I-495 to I-70, including the east and west I-270 spurs. The first element of the program is the I-495 and I-270 Managed Lanes Study. The second element will be a study on I-270 from I-370 to I-70, beginning in 2019. This I-495 & I-270 Managed Lanes Study includes the development of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The EIS will evaluate the potential improvements to the corridor and the related environmental effects of the alternatives. Do Maryland citizens have a voice in this process? Yes, there are multiple opportunities for citizens to have a voice in this process. To date, MDOT SHA has hosted eight public workshops in Montgomery and Prince George s counties. The first four scoping workshops were held in April. Four additional public open houses were held in July to update the public on 15 preliminary alternatives as well as the criteria to evaluate the alternatives to be carried forward.

Since March 2018, we have already received and recorded 2,902 public comments: 620 from the Scoping Open House Comment Period from March 16 to May 1 and 2,282 from the Alternatives Public Workshop Comment period from July 17 to August 27. Our focus now is to take the next few months to read, digest and process this latest round of public feedback collected in consideration of the alternatives to be carried forward by the next round of public comments in early 2019. It is important to note that people can always submit comments by: Using the comment form on our website at 495-270-p3.com to submit electronically Contacting the study team via email at 495-270-P3@sha.state.md.us Calling the study team toll free at 833-858-5960 Sending your comment by mail to: Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration I-495 & I-270 P3 Office 707 North Calvert Street Mail Stop P-601 Baltimore, MD 21202 MDOT SHA remains focused on providing the greatest amount of congestion relief to Marylanders in the National Capital area in a way that doesn't disrupt their lives or communities. From the start, this program has been about doing it right, no matter the time it takes to do so. Please stay tuned to the program website 495-270-p3.com for updates as they become available. Is Congestion really that bad that we need this sort of big solution? Traffic congestion in the National Capital region is among the worst in the nation. Drivers have to navigate between seven and 10 hours daily in traffic congestion on I-270 and I- 495. It is time for innovative solutions to this congestion. Congestion has hit a saturation point that is now spilling over into the local system more and more, and peak hours are getting longer and longer. Congestion will only get much worse. The population in the region is expected to grow by nearly 1.3 million people by 2040. In 2018, Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on I- 270 from I-370 to I-495 is 259,000 vehicles a day and that number is expected to increase to 299,000 by 2040. On I-495, from the Virginia line to I-270, Average Annual Daily Traffic is 253,000 and that number is expected to increase to 282,000 by 2040.

Can this $7.6 billion be better spent on schools, transit or other state programs rather than roads? Simply stated, this funding does not exist. There is no existing $7.6 billion in state dollars. This $7.6 billion is the value of a potential investment in the state s infrastructure through a Public Private Partnership (P3) agreement with the private sector. This mega-project will complement the $5.6 billion Purple Line P3 project that will connect our existing transit lines MARC, WMATA, Montgomery County s Ride On, Prince George s County s The Bus and University of Maryland at College Park s shuttle bus, as well as Montgomery and Howard County planned Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lines including the Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT). Without a P3, the only answer going forward for the state of Maryland is continued gridlock. The state does not have funding through its current means to deliver improvements of this magnitude without new, innovative funding sources or increased funding from existing sources. This project will provide congestion relief to the region with no new state dollars. Will toll roads be built? If an alternative is selected that involves new roadway lanes that are tolled, drivers in the existing free lanes also will benefit as some traffic is shifted onto the tolled lanes. Similar to summer-time commuting when schools are out, reduced traffic can make a tremendous difference in travel time and the customer experience. Previous studies, including one of the original Capital Beltway studies, determined that both transit and highway improvements are needed to fully meet the travel demand and provide the enhancements for the needed capacity and safety within the I-495 and I-270 corridors. Outside of that, previous studies have no relation to the innovative approach of this study. As part of the current National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, MDOT SHA has outlined 15 alternatives including no build. Detailed studies of these alternatives have not been performed so many details are not known yet. A preferred alternative will be identified once more detailed study is complete and additional public and agency input is received. A solution will not be selected until the study is complete. We will enlist the best and brightest in private industry and challenge them in finding innovative solutions to deliver one of or a variety of these alternatives and meet the program goals. The agency is evaluating a public-private partnership (P3) that could create innovative opportunities to fund the improvements with the least effect on Marylanders.

This mega-project will complement the $5.6 billion Purple Line P3 project that will connect our existing transit lines MARC, WMATA, Montgomery County s Ride On Bus, Prince George s County s The Bus and University of Maryland at College Park s Shuttle Bus, as well as Montgomery and Howard county planned Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) including the Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT). We are in the very early stages of NEPA, and public input on the preliminary range of alternatives is still being sought. A preferred alternative will be identified once more detailed design is done, environmental impacts are evaluated, and additional public and agency input is received. We will continue to work and collaborate in a transparent manner in identifying the best alternative(s) to deliver the best solution for the people of Maryland. What is a managed lane? A managed lane is a lane on an existing highway where operational strategies, such as lane use restrictions or congestion pricing, are used to optimize traffic flow and/or vehicle throughput. Managed lanes may include, but are not limited to, high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, reversible lanes, express toll lanes, and bus lanes. What is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)? The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is a federal law to ensure proper consideration is given to the environment prior to undertaking any major action that may significantly affect the environment. As part of the NEPA process, public review and comment is sought in the evaluation of environmental effects such as natural, cultural, social, and economic effects. What is an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)? An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is a public document prepared to determine if a project will have impacts on the community or environment. The EIS includes consideration of a range of reasonable alternatives, analyzes any potential impacts resulting from the alternatives, and demonstrates compliance with other applicable environmental laws and requirements. The EIS process is completed in the following steps: Notice of Intent (NOI), draft EIS, final EIS, and Record of Decision (ROD). As part of the NEPA Process, what is a Record of Decision (ROD)? A Record of Decision (ROD) formally concludes the environmental process for an EIS. The ROD indicates compliance with NEPA, outlines any potential impacts when identifying a preferred alternative, and assures the decision was not arbitrary.

What is the schedule? The Managed Lanes Study schedule is in place in compliance with NEPA and incorporates significant interface and feedback from the public. This study is not about going fast. It s about getting it right and providing congestion relief for Marylanders. Significant milestones are: Study Initiated, Notice of Intent published in Federal Register March 2018 Scoping Public Open Houses April 2018 Scoping Open House Comment Period - March 16 - May 1 Purpose and Need Developed May 2018 Preliminary Range of Alternatives- May - July 2018 Alternatives Public Workshops July 2018 Alternatives Public Workshop Comment - July 17 - August 27, 2018 Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study Developed August 2018 - Winter 2019 Alternatives Retained Public Workshop Winter 2019 MDOT SHA Recommended Preferred Alternative Spring 2019 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Fall 2019 DEIS Public Hearings Early Winter 2020 Final Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision Fall 2020 MDOT SHA has hosted eight public workshops in Montgomery and Prince George s counties. The first four scoping workshops were held in April and then four additional public open houses were held in July to update the public on 15 preliminary alternatives as well as the criteria to evaluate the alternatives to be carried forward. Since March 2018, we have already received and recorded 2,902 public comments: 620 from the Scoping Open House Comment Period from March 16 to May 1 and 2,282 from the Alternatives Public Workshop Comment period from July 17 to August 27. Our focus now is to take the next few months to read, digest and process this latest round of public feedback collected in consideration of the alternatives to be carried forward for the next round of public comments in early 2019. It is important to note that people can always submit comments during the process electronically on the program website at 495-270-p3.com, via email, toll-free phone or mail. Please stay tuned to the program website 495-270-p3.com for updates as they become available.

Is MDOT only investing in highways and not public transit? This mega-project will complement the $5.6 billion Purple Line P3 project that will connect our existing transit lines MARC, WMATA, Montgomery County s Ride On, Prince George s County s The Bus and University of Maryland at College Park s shuttle bus. With $5.6 billion in new transit investments from the private sector for the Purple Line and $1 billion in new or dedicated funding for WMATA, MDOT is investing in a balanced transportation network in both transit and road investments. The Purple Line project was a transit project that resulted from one of the original Capital Beltway studies. This study determined that both transit and highway improvements are needed to fully meet the travel demand and provide the enhancements for the needed capacity and safety within the I-495 and I-270 corridors. MDOT SHA has set forth 15 alternatives for public comment for addressing congestion in the corridor. These alternatives include a variety of options, including rail and bus transit such as fixed guideway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and dedicated bus managed lanes. Will this study be able to yield a solution that does not impact homes and businesses in the areas around I-495 and I-270? Our approach is to implement a solution within the existing state-owned property (rightof-way). We will be shockingly innovative, and through careful analysis, creative thinking and dialogue with the citizens of Maryland, we will deliver congestion relief the right way. We are focused on doing this in a way that provides the greatest amount of congestion relief to Marylanders without disrupting their lives or communities. Congestion relief, innovation and minimizing disruption to Marylanders are all the highest goals and objectives for the program. This process takes time. MDOT SHA will challenge the private sector to develop solutions that fit in that space. There are many innovative solutions for transportation features in tight spaces around the world and we want to see every possibility considered here in Maryland. Has MDOT developed a preliminary map showing possible impacts and targeted homes? No. There is no map. This process is in the very early stages and more detail will be developed after feedback and comments are read and analyzed for incorporation into the solutions. Part of the data collection now is to determine how best to avoid any and all impacts as much as possible. As part of that NEPA process, the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) is focused on implementing improvements within the existing state-owned property.

What is a Public-Private Partnership? A Public-Private Partnership (P3) is a method for delivering public infrastructure projects, such as highway improvements, with an agreement between a public owner (such as MDOT SHA) and a private entity. The private entity, known as a concessionaire or developer, performs functions under a single agreement that are normally completed through multiple contracts and/or with public resources. In this P3 we are seeking a concessionaire to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the project. What will the toll rates be? MDOT SHA is studying multiple congestion-relief solutions, including tolled and nontolled alternatives. If priced managed lanes are selected as the preferred alternative, a toll conversation and process would be started. Those choosing to use the priced managed lanes, including transit, would get a faster and more reliable trip. Those traveling in the regular, free lanes would benefit from fewer people in their lanes, which means a faster trip for everyone. Neighborhoods and communities would also benefit because less commuters would turn local roads into highways using traffic apps that direct them to inappropriate routes to avoid congestion. In Virginia, the Express Lanes on I-495 and I-95 are receiving strong customer satisfaction rates- 85 percent for weekly rush hour commuters and 80 percent for monthly customers. On I-495, 82 percent of customers spend less than $20 a month and 85 percent of trips were less than $12. On the I-95 Express Lanes, 74 percent of customers spend less than $20 a month. Why would MDOT SHA consider using a P3? Reasons for considering a P3 include: Projects Constructed Faster: P3 projects can move forward when the state does not have available funding because the concessionaire will finance the improvements based on future projected funding to be received. Transfer of Risks: The state and the private partner share the risks based on who can best manage each risk to provide the best value to the state. Operations and Maintenance: The state can benefit from having a concessionaire operate the highway and maintain it (for example, pavement repairs, grass mowing, snow removal) at a more economical cost. Limited Government Funding: Projects that include a future revenue source may be constructed with limited or no governmental funding upfront. Even with limited, upfront funding, MDOT SHA will be reimbursed with any build option by the private sector.

Is P3 the same as privatization? No. The state will retain ownership of the highway improvements and be responsible to ensure it meets its public function throughout the life of the agreement. When the agreement ends (typically 30 to 50 years), all the assets will be returned to the state in a pre-agreed condition. How will the state select the concessionaire? The state will use a competitive solicitation process to ensure the best value for the state. This process will be concurrent with the I-495 & I-270 Managed Lanes Study. How does the concessionaire make its money? A concessionaire will be compensated through revenues generated from the transportation facility. Who benefits from these lanes? Everyone! Customers who choose to utilize any new managed lanes would benefit from a faster trip, while customers in the lanes that exist today, including transit vehicles, benefit from the shift in travel to the new lanes for a better, more reliable trip for all vehicles. Managed lanes are being studied to provide more options for those needing to make critical decisions regarding reliable trip time along the study corridor. It has been found that a majority of travelers choose to use price managed lanes occasionally for critical or important trips such as reaching an appointment or a child s event. Experience in Virginia on I-495 and I-95 has shown most users spend less per month on tolls than they do on a single tank of gas. Most trips cost less than lunch at a fast, casual restaurant. In addition, the environment will benefit from the addition of managed lanes as there will be less congestion and vehicles will not be idling in bumper to bumper traffic and will be travelling at a free-flowing pace. # # #