International Experts Meeting on Severe Accident Management in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Similar documents
Nuclear Disaster Guidelines. for Preparedness, Response and Recovery. (Version: March 31, 2016) (English Translation)

Radiation Emergency Medicine 2012 Vol.1 No

Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Complete Record Document Covering from Relief Activities to Recovery Support

The JNA Effort toward Restoration Assistance for the Great East Japan Earthquake

For Accelerating the Reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake. March, 2014

WHO's response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident (2012) Seminar on the recovery and reconstruction of Fukushima, 3 September 2014, Geneva

Reconstruction of the Radiation Emergency Medical System From the Acute to the Sub-acute Phases After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Crisis

Designating and Rearranging the Areas of Evacuation. Cabinet Office, Japan Support Team for Residents Affected by Nuclear Incidents July 23, 2012

Japan: Earthquake and tsunami

Damages and Response to Great East Japan Earthquake. Guidance of medical service division, Health policy bureau, MHLW, JAPAN

Activities of the Japan Medical Association Team in Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake

Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 1. Emergency Exposure Dose Control in the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP 4

<Introduction> <Reply to the recommendations>

Final Report. (Main Text)

Study Abroad Crisis Management at MSSU

31 March 2015 Office for Radiation Protection of Workers Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku Tokyo , Japan

Contents 1. Emergency Exposure Dose Control in the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP 2

Chapter 2 From Hiroshima to Fukushima

Japan Medical Association Team s (JMAT) First Call to Action in the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake

WHO SITREP NO. 35. Japan earthquake and tsunami Situation Report No July All times stated below are in Tokyo time.

Technical Volume 3 Emergency preparedness and response

Japan: Earthquake and Tsunami

Basic Guidelines for Reconstruction in Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake in the Reconstruction and Revitalization Period

The JNA Effort toward Restoration Assistance following the Great East Japan Earthquake

Lessons Learned: Radiation Protection for Emergency Response and Remediation / Decontamination Work Involved in TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident

Civil Protection Operational Management Plan of Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Provisional translation)

Planning for a Nuclear Incident: Tackling the Impossible

Fukushima and JSDF Difficult communication between off-site and on-site

Great East Japan Earthquake and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Regulatory Code

For Accelerating the Reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake. February 2014 NEMOTO Takumi, Minister for Reconstruction

Presentation Outline. 1. Introduction: Disasters without. 2. Critical initial 72 hours after Disease

For the relief of victims of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas

Disaster Medicine and the Role of Medical Associations* 1

Response to Fukushima NPP Accident - Medical Response in Korea -

Report of the Expert Meeting on Epidemiological Studies Targeting Emergency Workers at the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Kotava A. 1*, Sasnouskaya A. 2. Belarus. Chernobyl Aaccident, The Gomel Regional Hospital, Belarus ABSTRACT

Response of the Open University of Japan (OUJ) to the Great East Japan Earthquake and Establishment of a Risk Management System

Responding to A Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) Medical Aspects of Response

Formulation of the Guideline: Guidelines on Maintaining and Improving Health of Emergency Workers at Nuclear Facilities, etc.

Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Complete Record Document Covering from Relief Activities to Recovery Support

Awareness of Necessity for Radiation Risk Communication among Municipalities Adjacent to Nuclear Power Plants in Japan

Japan: Earthquake and Tsunami

Disaster Health After the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and its call for evidence based science

Details of Study Report 1 1 Introduction 2 International Emergency Response Systems 3 Present Situation and Approach in East Asia 4 Conclusion

Health care response to the tsunami in Taro District, Miyako City, Iwate Prefecture

Emergency Scenarios. National Response Plan. Example: Goiânia, Brazil September Goiânia Radiological Accident. Goiânia Public Health Impacts

The REAC/TS Experience with Fukushima Response

Reform of Japan s Nuclear Safety Regulation

Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Guidelines. Preparedness, Response and Recovery. Saving lives, changing minds.

Advance Unedited Version

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

The Japan Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (J.CLAIR), Singapore

Japan: Earthquake and Tsunami

Chapter 1 Reviewing Two Years of Radiation Emergency Medical Assistance

Executive Summary of the Interim Report

AREN T WE READY YET? CLOSING THE PLANNING, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY GAPS FOR RADIOLOGICAL TERRORISM

The Great East Japan Earthquake

Telemedicine network as a disaster risk reduction

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 3-1. Mobilizing and Coordinating Expert Teams, Nongovernmental Organizations, Nonprofit Organizations, and Vounteers

55 th IAEA General Conference IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Programme Monday 19 September Friday 23 September 2011

Call for Applications

I. Summary. Commercial operation commencement date April , February , June ,

EMERGENCY ARRANGEMENTS OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Emergency Management Nuclear Power Generation

Japan Post Co., Ltd.

Organized in cooperation with the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD/NEA)

AUSTIN/MOWER COUNTY-WIDE

University of Maryland Baltimore. Radiation Safety Procedure

JAEA s Instructor Training Program for Asian Countries. Nuclear Human Resource Development Center (NuHRDeC) Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)

THE IAEA FUKUSHIMA REPORT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

From Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Fukushima 3 Nuclear disasters and health: lessons learned, challenges, and proposals

Regulatory Issues Licensure by State Department of Nuclear Safety/Homeland Security or NRC Current License required or a "Timely Filed Notice"

POST FUKUSHIMA: ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY AND PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE ON NUCLEAR PROGRAM IN MALAYSIA

FIRE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ACT

In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful. Message from DR HUSSEIN A. GEZAIRY REGIONAL DIRECTOR WHO EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN REGION.

Attitude of the elderly of Japan in the International Comparison Study

56 th IAEA General Conference IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Programme Monday 17 September Friday 21 September 2012 DATE TIME SIDE EVENT AGENDA ROOM

IAEA MISSION TO REVIEW NISA S APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAFETY OF EXISTING POWER REACTOR FACILITIES

Emergency Preparedness Near Nuclear Power Plants

The Role of Self-Defense Forces (SDF) in Responding to the Great East Japan Earthquake

Medical ICT in Japan A pivot of the Growth Strategy of the Abe government

Supporting Areas Struck by Natural Disaster

LEARNING FROM DISASTER SIMULATION DRILLS IN JAPAN

Nuclear Law and Malaysian Legal Framework on Nuclear Security AISHAH BIDIN FACULTY OF LAW UKM

Evaluation. Report Findings and Lessons Learned from the Japanese Red Cross Society s Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Aid Report

Recent Activities of ANSN Steering Committee and Topical Group on EPR

Information bulletin China: Ludian Earthquake

Support for the Emergency Preparedness of Nuclear Facilities

PLANNING AND PROGRESS FOR DECOMMISSIONING OF HEAVY WATER RESEARCH REACTOR

Health literacy promotion in Fukushima after the nuclear accident:


Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex

HERCA-WENRA Approach

NUCLEAR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES

Section 2 Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

The IAEA OSART Review. Attachment 1 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Transcription:

International Experts Meeting on Severe Accident Management in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant March 19, 2014 Relief Activities Conducted by the Japanese Red Cross Society after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident and the Challenges for the Future Japanese Red Cross Society Dr. Yoichi Watanabe, M.D. Vice President Director General (Dept. of Neurosurgery) Fukushima Red Cross Hospital

The Japanese Red Cross Society (JRCS) The Japanese Red Cross Society (JRCS) is conducting its activities as an auxiliary role to the Japanese Government based on the Geneva Conventions and the resolutions adopted at the International Conference of the Red Cross. The JRCS operates 92 hospitals across Japan and contributes to providing medical needs to communities. The JRCS provides medical relief activities in disasters and organizes about 500 medical relief teams (about 5,000 team members). When a disaster occurs: JRCS medical relief teams will be dispatched. The relief teams establish derus (domestic emergency response units) upon necessity. JRCS relief teams provide medical care in the disaster-hit area and evacuation centers. Psychological care will also be provided on a continuing basis.

Mt. Bandai ( Erupted in 1888, Fukushima) The monument of the disaster relief activities

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Number of beds:349 Regional disaster medical center (disaster base hospital) Number of physicians: 38 full-time physicians, 4 residents Number of nurses: 278 Japanese DMAT:1 team (In March 2011) Patients transported by ambulance: 2,700 2,800 / year Fukushima Red Cross Hospital 62km Miyagi Pref. The Pacific Ocean Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Tochigi Pref. Ibaraki Pref.

At 14:46, March 11, 2011 Seismic Intensity: 6- (in the City of Fukushima) First response at hospital: CSCA (Command and Control, Safety, Communication, Assessment) Established disaster response headquarters Confirmed safety of inpatients, outpatients and hospital staff Checked damage to hospital buildings and confirmed the safety of the buildings Minor damage to the walls (cracks) and the connecting corridors No danger of building or ceiling collapsing Decided it was possible for hospital operations to continue This decision was announced by the hospital public announcement system. Essential utilities : Water supply stopped, power failure in-house power generation X-ray and blood tests: Impossible Boilers and sterilizer equipment were broken and thus impossible for surgical instruments to be sterilized Met twice a day to convey/share information - morning and evening Participants: All physicians, chief nurses, administrative managers and managers of core function shared information about all hospital staff Accepted many patients with injuries and diseases: Established a triage area Accepted 34 patients DMAT (Disaster Medical Assistance Team: 1 physician, 2 nurses, 2 clerks) was dispatched to Minamisoma City Hospital and they in turn transported two patients with serious respiratory insufficiency and multiple traumas to the Fukushima Medical University Hospital..

JRCS Relief Teams in Fukushima (Daytime, March 12) 12 JRCS relief teams (from the JRCS National Headquarters, Fukushima, Kanagawa, Niigata, Aichi (2), Shiga, Okayama, Hiroshima, Ehime, Kagawa and Kochi) Relief activity locations: Shinchi, Soma, Tamura, Koriyama and Kawamata 132,000 evacuees at primary evacuation centers :Relief Team Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Explosion at Unit 1 At 15:36, March 12

JRCS Relief Teams in Fukushima (Evening, March 12) 7 JRCS relief teams (from Fukushima, Shiga, Okayama, Hiroshima, Ehime, Kagawa and Kochi) Relief activity locations: Kawamata (Many evacuates from the restricted zone) Needs among the evacuees: Treatment to avoid worsening hypertension Prescription of their regular medications Distribution of iodine tablets Body contamination screening Left for Shiroishi or Ishinomaki :Relief Team GM survey meters were not equipped. Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Residents living within a 20km radius of the power plant -> Ordered to evacuate (at 18:25)

JRCS Relief Teams in Fukushima (Evening, March 13) 7 JRCS relief teams (from Fukushima, Shiga, Okayama, Hiroshima, Ehime, Kagawa and Kochi) Returned to the Fukushima Chapter office and a meeting was held. Relief teams from other chapters: We cannot conduct relief activities in areas where safety cannot be guaranteed. We will return to our hospitals for our relief team members safety. :Relief Team Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Residents living within a 20km radius of the power plant -> Ordered to evacuate

JRCS Relief Teams in Fukushima (March 14) All the relief teams dispatched from other JRCS chapters left Fukushima and only Fukushima Red Cross Hospital remained to provide relief activities. Relief teams left the evacuees behind: Appropriate? :Relief Team Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Residents living within a 20km radius of the power plant -> Ordered to evacuate.

JRCS Relief Teams in Fukushima 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 DMAT Fukushima High School Onahama Junior High 2 Fukushima Soma Kawamata Azuma Gym Azuma Gym Azuma Gym Azuma Gym Azuma Gym Azuma Gym Azuma Gym Azuma Gym National HQ Kanagawa Niigata Aichi 1 Shinchi Shinchi Shinchi Shinchi Left for Shiroishi and Ishinomaki DMAT Azuma Gym Niigata Aichi 2 Shinchi Shiga Soma/Kawamata Okayama Koriyama/ Kawamata Hiroshima Ehime Kagawa Kochi Kawamata Tamura Tamura Tamura L e f t Tokyo Yamanashi Azuma Gym Azuma Gym

Response to the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake by the Japanese Red Cross Society (15) March 19, 2011 (as of 12:00) Disaster Management Division, Disaster Management and Social Welfare Department, Japanese Red Cross Society (Tel. 03-3437-7084) Response to the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake by the Japanese Red Cross Society is as follows: Please note that the descriptions and figures of the preliminary report will be updated. 1. JRCS relief teams dispatched as of 14:00, March 19, 2011 Dispatched location Relief activities being conducted Number of relief teams (including deru, etc.) Preparing for relief activities Relief activities completed Total Number of relief teams dispatched to date Hokkaido 0 0 5 5 Iwate 13* 1 11 30 54 Miyagi 27 21* 2 61 109 Yamagata 0 0 1 1 Fukushima 1 4 15 20 Ibaraki 0 0 13 13 Tochigi 0 0 2 2 Chiba 0 0 2 2 Nagano 0 0 2 2 Total 41 36 131 208 *1: 1 air ambulance included. *2: 4 trucks loaded with medications included.

Reasons for Limited Relief Activities in Fukushima 1. No code of conduct to respond to nuclear disasters 2. Lack of knowledge about radiation emergency medicine 3. Lack of equipment to measure radiation and protective gear Air dose meter Personal dosimeter GM survey meter Not equipped From March 26, 2011, personal dosimeter began to be distributed to JRCS relief teams Safety guidance: Air dose rate : Contact headquarters for direction at 20 μsv/h Evacuate if it reaches 100 μsv/h Personal dosimeter : Evacuate if it reaches 1 msv

Proposal from Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Education and training on radiation emergency medicine should be included in its disaster medicine training program so JRCS relief teams can understand the basics. If relief teams need to be sent to an area near a nuclear power plant after a disaster occurs: Correct information about released radioactive substances, etc. should be evaluated. At the same time, a system should be established in which relief team members can guarantee their personal safety by carrying an air dosimeter, personal digital dosimeter and GM survey meter to measure radiation levels.

JRCS Safety Measures for Relief Activities under Nuclear Disaster The JRCS established safety measures for its relief teams to conduct relief activities under nuclear disaster. 1. Criteria for cumulative exposure level: 1 msv 2. Procurement of protective equipment 3. Training for radiation emergency medicine 4. Established Guidelines for Relief Activities under Nuclear Disasters

µsv/h 30 Air Dose Rate in March 2011 - In the City of Fukushima - 25 20 24.24 21.4 15 10 14.8 12.7 11.1 10.0 8.06 7.19 6.09 5 5.43 3.98 0 3/12 15:36 Explosion at Unit 1 0.08 0.1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3/14 11:01 Explosion at Unit 3 3/15 6:10 Explosion at Unit 2 Fire at Unit 4 (Date in March)

Responses at Fukushima Red Cross Hospital (Instructing and Providing Information to Hospital Staff) Fukushima Red Cross Hospital In the case of air dose rate exceeding 100μSv/h: Stay inside the hospital for at least 3 days and wait for dose to decline Ensure iodine tablets and food & drink to survive for 3 days Share safety information about effect from radiation Acute exposure: No health effect if exposure dose is 100 msv or below. Measurement of environmental dose at each section of the hospital Our hospital accepted the temporary leave or evacuation by our staff who felt anxiety about radiation.

March 18, 2011 (Air dose rate in the City of Fukushima:12.7 µsv/h ) 3 μsv/h 15 μsv/h 0 μsv/h 3 μsv/h 0 μsv/h 0 μsv/h

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Screening for Internal Contamination Using Whole-body Counter (WBC) FASTSCAN manufactured by CANBERRA Count time: 2 minutes Two sodium iodide (NaI) detectors (7.62cm 12.7cm 40.6cm)

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Measurement Using WBC Detects gamma rays in the body Two possible nuclides currently detected in the body after the nuclear accident: Cs-134, Cs-137 K-40 which exists in the natural environment is always detected Lower limit of detection at Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Cs-134 180Bq Cs-137 200Bq Lower limit depends on environments (background), where WBC is installed Lower limit depends on WBCs

No. of WBC Screening and Measurement Result April 2012 January 2014 Age No. of screened persons Not detected Detected Detection rate 2~3 36 36 0 0.00% 4~6 1,651 1,650 1 0.06% Elementary school students Junior high school students High school students 345 345 0 0.00% 89 88 1 1.12% 2,343 2,309 34 1.45% 39 years old > 4,183 4,159 25 0.60% 40 years old 6,822 6,644 178 2.61% Total: 15,469 15,231 239 1.55%

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Committed Effective Dose of All Screened Persons : Less Than 1mSv Committed effective dose: Cumulative, lifelong dose after an intake of radioactive substances For adults: for 50 years For children: until becoming 70 years old Dose limit for radiation workers: 50mSv per year Dose limit for the public: 1mSv per year

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital At our hospital, 15,469 persons were screened using WBC from April 9, 2012 to January 31, 2014. There were 239 persons whose values were above lower limit of detection and internal exposure was observed. The detection rate was 1.55%. The detection rate was especially low in children elementary school age or lower and in their parents aged 39 and under. The data suggests that parents with little children were well aware of internal exposure and paid close attention to the intake of food. On the other hand, some of the people aged 40 or over were not so conscious about internal exposure. They ate vegetables grown in their gardens without food testing. This resulted in a difference in the screening data. It is important to continue the screening using the whole-body counter and educate people on being more conscious about reducing of internal exposure.

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital s Challenges in the Future Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Building a new hospital People in the community can feel comfortable and trust when visiting the hospital and seeing a doctor Preventive medicine Active involvement in check-ups Continuation of internal exposure screening using WBC Thyroid examination, which is part of health management program for Fukushima people by the Fukushima Prefectural Government Open lectures for the community and health consultations Implementation of Psychological care activities

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital s Challenges in the Future Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Disaster medicine Dissemination of information on nuclear disaster Seminars/trainings about disaster medicine Establish a radiation emergency medicine system Primary radiation emergency hospital Medical assistance team in nuclear disaster (NMAT) Response to possible radiation exposure accidents in decommissioning and decontaminating at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Fukushima Red Cross Hospital s Challenges in the Future Fukushima Red Cross Hospital Collaboration with Fukushima Medical University in disseminating information on disaster medical care to other countries Co-hosting of international conferences and meetings in the City of Fukushima Radiation disaster education: Dispatching of education teams abroad; trainings and mutual exchanges between Fukushima and other countries Dissemination of information to other countries using the Red Cross network Development of a network for radiation emergency medicine in collaboration with IAEA and WHO Building of infrastructure and database for disaster/emergency medical care information Building of a robust information network for emergency medical care by connecting base hospitals in Fukushima Establishing the most appropriate emergency medical care system by building emergency medical care database

JRCS Nuclear Disaster Resource Center The JRCS established the Japanese Red Cross Nuclear Disaster Resource Center in October 2013. Main activities: 1. Develop and disseminate guidelines 2. Information gathering, compiling and sharing through its Digital Archives http://ndrc.jrc.or.jp 3. Inter-organization cooperation both inside and outside the JRCS

Mission Statement The mission statement of the Japanese Red Cross Society: We mobilize people who desire to save those who are suffering, and protect the life, health and dignity of human beings in any circumstances.