U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

Similar documents
U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Wildland Fire Assistance

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System


Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Report Documentation Page

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

USMC Expeditionary Energy

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

United States Air Force 423 SCMS Hydraulic Actuator Chrome Replacement

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Closing the Barn Doors After the Cows Have Left: MCRC s Solution to the Recruiter Shortfall EWS Subject Area Manpower

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Review of Defense Contract Management Agency Support of the C-130J Aircraft Program

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Recruiting and Retention: An Overview of FY2006 and FY2007 Results for Active and Reserve Component Enlisted Personnel

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

QDR 2010: Implementing the New Path for America s Defense

Medical Requirements and Deployments

Transcription:

Order Code RS22633 Updated May 9, 28 U.S. Forces in Afghanistan JoAnne O Bryant and Michael Waterhouse Information Research Specialists Knowledge Services Group Summary As interest in troop level deployments continues, there remains an increase of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. President Bush announced in a February 15, 27, speech the Administration s plans for an increase in U.S. forces in Afghanistan, including a planned gradual increase of 3,2 U.S. troops on the ground. This report provides official Department of Defense (DOD) statistical information on U.S. forces now serving in Afghanistan with comparisons to earlier force levels. It also provides brief official information on the military units extended or scheduled for the next rotation of duty into Afghanistan. As of April 1, 28, according to DOD, the United States had 33, troops stationed in Afghanistan 25,2 active component and 7,8 National Guard or Reserves. They are serving in two missions a NATO-led peacekeeping mission and a separate U.S.-led combat effort called Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). For security reasons, DOD does not routinely report the composition, size, or specific destination of military forces deployed to the Persian Gulf. This report will be updated upon receipt of new DOD data. For additional information on U.S. forces, see CRS Report RL3588, Afghanistan: Post-War Governance, Security and U.S. Policy by Kenneth Katzman, and CRS Report RL3353, U.S. and Coalition Military Operations in Afghanistan: Issues for Congress, by Andrew Feickert. Force Levels As of April 1, 28, according to the Department of Defense (DOD), the United States had 33, military personnel deployed in Afghanistan. Of these, 25,2 were active component personnel and 7,8 were National Guard and Reserves. Figures 1 and 2 provide the distribution by armed service of active component personnel. These totals do not include 23, military support personnel in Kuwait, or naval personnel aboard ships patrolling through the Persian Gulf. 1 1 DOD Fact Sheet, Global Commitments, December 14, 27.

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 74-188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 124, Arlington VA 2222-432. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 9 MAY 28 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE U.S. Forces in Afghanistan 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED --28 to --28 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Congressional Research Service,The Library of Congress,11 Independence Ave, SE,Washington,DC,254-75 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 1. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 5 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

CRS-2 Amid concerns about U.S. troop levels, in a February 15, 27 speech, President Bush announced an extension of deployment for more than 3,2 U.S. troops in Afghanistan as part of a new initiative in ongoing efforts to stabilize the security situation and to confront a resurgent Taliban. Since the speech on troop deployments by President Bush, the number of troops to Afghanistan fluctuated between February through November 27. However, there has been a steady increase in troop deployments to Afghanistan since December 27. Additional deployment information is available from DOD s Directorate for Information Operations, which posts quarterly reports on casualties and worldwide active duty military personnel deployments by region and country online at [http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/military/miltop.htm]. Figure 1. Active Component Personnel in Afghanistan (as of April 1, 28) 18, 16, 14, 17,7 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 3,2 1,5 2,8 2, Army Air Force Navy Marine Corps Source: Department of Defense, Office of the Joint Chief Staff, Boots on Ground data.

CRS-3 Figure 2. Reserve Component Personnel in Afghanistan (as of April 1, 28) Army NG Air NG 4 5,4 Army Rv 1,3 Air Rv Navy Rv 3 4 Marine Rv 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Source: Department of Defense, Office of the Joint Chief Staff, "Boots on Ground" data. Figure 3. Comparative OEF Reserve Component Force Levels (April 27/April 28) 6, 5, 5,4 Apr-7 Apr-8 4, 3, 2, 2,7 1,3 1, 519 4 59 231 3 33 4 4 Army NG Air NG Army Rv Air Rv Navy Rv Marine Rv Comparative U.S. Force Levels. Overall U.S. force levels in Afghanistan have been increasing since 26, in both active duty and the reserve components. Based on DOD statistics, Figures 3 through 6 provide comparative data on both active and reserve component force levels. Data in the figures below include month-to-month and year-toyear comparisons of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Senior Bush Administration officials reportedly stated that DOD is considering sending up to 7, additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan in 29 in response to a projected shortfall of NATO forces from other

CRS-4 countries. 2 Of the current forces shown, about 6% of U.S. personnel serve in the NATOled peacekeeping force called the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), and the remainder continue to serve under direct U.S. command in counter-terrorism combat missions and Afghan security forces training. This mission is called Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The U.S. forces under NATO command have served in that capacity since October 26, when NATO/ISAF took over peacekeeping responsibility for all of Afghanistan. Figure 4. Comparative OEF Active Component Force Levels (April 27/April 28) 17,7 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 16,296 3,58 86 1,5 Apr-7 Apr-8 3,2 2,8 343 Army Navy AF MC Source: Department of Defense, Office of the Joint Chief Staff, Boots on Ground data. Figure 5. Comparative U.S. Force Levels in Afghanistan (January 27 - December 27) 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 2,947 25,876 Feb-7 Jan-7 24,845 24,6 24,56 23,881 24,474 24,31 26,48 24,615 24,78 24,8 Apr-7 Mar-7 Jun-7 May-7 Aug-7 Jul-7 Oct-7 Sep-7 Dec-7 Nov-7 Source: Department of Defense, Office of the Joint Chief Staff, Boots on Ground data, January 1, 27, through December 1, 27. 2 Pentagon Considers Adding Forces in Afghanistan to Make Up for NATO Shortfall, New York Times, May 3, 28, p.a5.

CRS-5 Figure 6. Comparative U.S. Force Levels in Afghanistan (Years 27 and 28) 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 24,31 April 27 April 28 33, Source: Department of Defense, Office of the Joint Chief Staff, Boots on Ground data. U.S. Troop Rotations for Afghanistan. On October 19, 27, January 15, and March 14, 28, DOD announced its latest scheduled troop deployment adjustments and schedule for rotations to Afghanistan in conjunction with the two missions under which they serve. This 28 schedule for the affected regular Army, National Guard, and Marine Corps units is summarized in Table 1 below. Rotations to Afghanistan for Army and National Guard units currently last for 15 months, but are to be reduced to 12 months beginning August 1, 28. Rotations for Marine Corps units last seven months. Table 1. Operation Enduring Freedom Rotational Units Military Unit Home Military Base 28 Transitions Army and Army National Guard 27 th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, Army National Guard 33 rd Brigade Combat Team, Illinois Army National Guard Syracuse, NY Early to Mid 28 Urbana, IL Late 28 3 rd Brigade, 1 st Infantry Division Fort Hood, TX Late Summer, 28 Marines 24 th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) Camp Lejeune, NC Spring 28 Source: Department of Defense News Releases October 19, 27, January 15, and March 14, 28.