BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: May 20, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. /..3. Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda Public Hearing D. Staff Member Responsible:

Similar documents
Welcome To Gulf County RESTORE Web Portal Overview. October 13 th, :00 p.m. EDT Emergency Operations Center

Gulf County, Florida Multi-year Implementation Plan (MYIP)

Gulf County RESTORE Act Project Submission Guidance Document

GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION COUNCIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPONENT PROGRAM

John s Pass Transient Dock

Direct Component Project Evaluation Form

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

RESTORE ACT Universities Role

Restoration of the Mississippi River Delta in a Post-BP Oil Spill Environment

FLORIDA STORMWATER ASSOCIATION 2014 Winter Conference. Stormwater Projects and the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

RAC Public Meeting Minutes Apalachicola, Florida December 15, 2015, 5:00 p.m.

Gulf of Mexico Ecosystem Restoration: Using a Foundation of Ecological, Economic and Social Components December 6, 2016

Workshop Summary. BP Deepwater Horizon Restoration & Recovery: Implementing the RESTORE Act in Texas

Charting Restoration. Gulf Restoration Priorities and Funded Projects Seven Years After Deepwater Horizon. nature.org/gulf

Submitted by: Toby Baker, Commissioner Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Good Projects Checklist. Important Elements for Gulf Restoration Projects

Outreach and Adaptive Strategies for Climate Change: The Role of NOAA Sea Grant Extension in Engaging Coastal Residents and Communities

Alabama Coastal Area Management Program Strategic Plan

Statements of Interest. Request for Proposals (RFP)

Submitted by: Toby Baker, Commissioner Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grants Program

RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No Applicant Name:

GULF COAST RESTORATION CORPS

Request for Qualifications Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund Support Services

South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium Leadership by Staff on Boards and Committees

Putting coastal and Great Lakes science to work for communities since 1968

Newsletter of the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System

Submitted by: Toby Baker, Commissioner Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

I. Introduction. Timeline: Pre-proposal Feedback to PIs: February 24, 2017

ST PETERSBURG CITY COUNCIL ENERGY, NATURAL RESOURCES & SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE AGENDA. Meeting of October 20, a.m. 10 a.m. City Hall Room 100

Oregon John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor

APPENDIX D PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION PROGRESS REPORT. Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy Appendix D-1

Coastal Research and Extension Study Groups: Partners in Putting Science to Work in South Carolina. Request for Mini-Proposals

Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

NOAA Fisheries Update

Gulf Coast Restoration: RESTORE Act and Related Efforts

Part IV. Appendix C: Funding Sources

SUMMARY: The Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council (Council) is issuing a final

Charting Restoration

MARYLAND SEA GRANT PROJECT SUMMARY (90-2)

Estuary Conservation Association, Inc

Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Draft Phase I Early Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: March 19, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5

Project Details. Title: White Island Restoration. Escambia County Florida RESTORE Program - Project Details

RE: Public Comments on the BP Oil Spill Consent Decree and Draft Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN

Photo: Shira Bizarel. Design Brief

@Count Adminlstrato~s 51

Oceans of Opportunity: Managing Future Uses of Florida s Ocean Spaces

The Sport Fish Restoration and Boating Trust Fund

Maintenance and Enhancement of the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Regional Association NA08NOS

Online Report Submission Guide Michigan Sea Grant

Re: Local Contracting Preference Interpretation; Request for Comment, ID: GCERC

GOMURC 2013 Annual Progress Report

Pensacola and Perdido Bays Estuary Program (PPBEP)

The Chesapeake Bay 2014 Agreement

ADVANTAGE COASTAL ALABAMA

Seawall Earthquake Safety + Disaster Prevention Program Community Meeting June 21, 2018

Attendees: *Denotes official RAC member

Washington Maritime Blue Strategy Overview and Process Accelerating Innovation for a Sustainable Maritime Future

Military Conservation Partner Award Guidance

Estero Island Restoration. The shoreline from R-176 through R-200, inclusive, has been designated as critically eroded by FDEP.

Funding Coastal Protection & Restoration

Pinellas County EM FACT SHEET NEW INFORMATION IN BOLD PRINT. Fact Sheet #11 Event: Deep Water Horizon Date/Time: 7/16/2010, 3:00 pm

[FWS R4 ES 2018 N015; FVHC XXX FF04G01000] Notice of Availability; Florida Trustee Implementation Group Deepwater Horizon

New York s Great Lakes Basin Small Grants Program 2014 Request for Proposals

APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

Project Priority Scoring System Texas Recreation & Parks Account Non-Urban Indoor Recreation Grant Program (Effective May 1, 2014)

NORTH CAROLINA RESPONSE COORDINATION FOR THE DEEPWATER HORIZON INCIDENT (DHI)

Advantage Coastal Alabama Advantage Coastal Alabama

Interreg IPA Crossborder. Programme Croatia Bosnia and Herzegovina Montenegro Information session 1

Health and Medicine Division and The Gulf Research Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BIG DARBY ACCORD. Proposals Due by October 25, 2004

Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Sustainability Plan

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES SUSAN HARRIS MONTGOMERY COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Connecting Decision-makers, Landowners, and Users with Information and Tools for Preserving and Enhancing our Nation's Working Waterfronts.

Georgia Environmental Conference

ELECTRONIC MONITORING & REPORTING GRANTS 2018 PRIORITIES WEBINAR

GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FY2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

Professional Planning Services to Complete Recreation Plan Update

Pinellas. (ollnt OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM

Correspondence: 1. Author Information. Correspondence Information. Correspondence Text. Keep Private: Penny J. Easton. Organization Type:

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNITS NETWORK

RESOLUTION NO. THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 10

RE: Comments on Alabama Trustee Implementation Group Restoration Area Plan 1 - Draft Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

Newsletter of the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System

Summary Statistics from the 2014 Oil Spill Science Social Network Analysis

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Project Title: Fiduciary Agent Contact Info:

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP

Gulf of Mexico Program The Settlement Agreement and Initial Planning

Cooperative Law Enforcement Strategic Plan

Alaska Fish and Wildlife Fund

Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

Request for Proposals

Dewberry 25 West Cedar Street, Suite 110 Pensacola, FL

Annual Report. Estuary Conservation Association. December 31, For the Year Ending on

Regulatory Guidance Letter 92-01

November 20, 2017 PUBLIC NOTICE

Transcription:

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: May 20, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. /..3 Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda Public Hearing D Development of the Pinellas County Multiyear Implementation Plan for the use of Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States Act (RESTORE) Direct Component Funds from civil penalties resulting from the 2010 BP Oil Spill. Department: Department of Environment and Infrastructure Staff Member Responsible: Richard Coates, P. E., Director Transportation & Stormwater Recommended Action: I RECOMMEND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (BOARD) APPROVE THE PROPOSED PINELLAS COUNTY RESTORE ACT GOALS AND PRIORITIES AND THE RESTORE ACT PROJECT SELECTION AND RANKING PROCESS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND THE RESTORE ACT WORKING GROUP. Summary Explanation/Background: County staff, in collaboration with the RESTORE Act Working Group, has recently completed two milestones in the process to develop a Multiyear Implementation Plan (MYIP) for submittal to the U.S. Treasury. Since January 2014, there have been four Working Group meetings and two subcommittee meetings. The Working Group has been tasked with making recommendations to County staff. The Working Group has approved their Charter, a set of recommended County RESTORE Act project goals and priorities, and a project selection and ranking process. The project selection and ranking process is a critical step to determine which submitted projects will receive priority for funding in the MYIP. Eleven ranking criteria have been recommended and they include points for how well projects meet Gulf Coast Restoration Council goals, select County Comprehensive Plan Element goals, RESTORE Act eligible activities and County priorities. Other criteria address regional benefits, partnerships, project benefit longevity and matching funds. Approval of the goals, priorities and project selection and ranking will allow the planning process to continue with the next steps to include: Development and activation of a web-based project idea and project submittal page 3-4 month open period to receive project ideas and project proposals Selection and ranking of projects for inclusion in MYIP Development of a MYIP for approval by the Board and U.S. Treasury Fiscal Impact/Cost/Revenue Summary: N/A Exhibits/Attachments Attached: RESTORE Act Working Group Members Pinellas County RESTORE Act Project Selection & Ranking Process Pinellas County RESTORE Act Direct Component (POT #1) Multiyear Implementation Plan Development Revised 03-2012

PINELLAS COUNTY RESTORE ACT MEETING PARTICIPANTS WORKING GROUP MEMBERS Mayor Ms. Ms. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Member Bob Minning Carlos Frey Elliot Shoberg David White Peter Clark Elizabeth Fetherston Cathy Harrelson Mark Rachal Mark Hafen Ernst Peebles Mark Luther Bob McConnell Randy Runnels Mike Colby Frank Chivas Dennis O'Hern Affiliation BIG-C I Treasure Island St. Petersburg Clearwater National Wildlife Federation Tampa Bay Watch Ocean Conservancy Gulf Restoartion Network Audubon, FL Coastal Is. Sanctuaries USF School of Geosciences USF College of Marine Science USF College of Marine Science Tampa Bay Water FDEP Tampa Bay Aquatic Preserves Clearwater Marine Association Baystar Restaurant Group Fishing Rights Alliance COUNTY STAFF Andy Squires Ms. Liz Freeman Mike Meidel Ms. Libby Carnahan Environmental & Infrastructure Strategic Planning & Initiatives Economic Development UF/IFAS Extension Marine Agent FACILITATOR Ms. Lindsay Cross Tampa Bay Estuary Program

PINELLAS COUNTY RESTORE ACT PROJECT SELECTION & RANKING PROCESS COUNTY RESTORE ACT PROJECT GOALS The Pinellas County Board of County Commission has adopted the following goals for use of RESTORE Act Direct Component funds. Projects and programs to implement these goals, to the extent feasible, should ( 1) provide and/or contribute to countywide and/or regional environmental and/or economic benefits, and (2) utilize a collaborative approach emphasizing environmental stewardship and sustainable practices. 1. All projects must benefit the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem through one or more of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council's five goals: A. Restore and Conserve Habitat, B. Restore Water Quality, C. Replenish and Protect Living Coastal and Marine Resources, D. Enhance Community Resilience, E. Build and Revitalize the Gulf Economy. 2. Projects may also support, further, or implement goals as identified in the Future Land Use and Quality Communities; Natural Resource Conservation and Management; Coastal Management; Recreation, Open Space and Culture; and Economic Elements of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan http://www.pinellascounty.org/plan/comp plan/comp-plan.pdf RESTORE ACT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES I. Restoration/protection of natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine wildlife habitats, beaches, and coastal wetlands 2. Mitigation of damage to fish, wildlife, and natural resources 3. Implementation of Federally-approved marine, coastal, or comprehensive conservation management plan, including fisheries monitoring 4. Workforce development and job creation 5. Improvements to or on State parks in coastal areas affected by Deepwater Horizon oil spill 6. Infrastructure projects benefitting the economy or ecological resources, including port infrastructure 7. Coastal flood protection and related infrastructure 8. Promotion of Gulf Coast Region tourism, including recreational fishing 9. Promotion of the consumption of seafood harvesting from the Gulf Coast Region COUNTY RESTORE ACT PROJECT PRIORITIES (not in order of priority) a. Protect and restore native habitats b. Provide stormwater quality improvements c. Create policies, programs, and/or mechanisms to remediate environmental and/or economic damages d. Protect against future environmental and/or economic vulnerability e. Provide climate change/sea-level rise planning, adaptation and/or related community engagement f. Provide flood and storm protection to infrastructure and other publically owned assets that consider resilience and changing sea levels g. Implement or further actions in the Pinellas County Post Disaster Redevelopment Plan h. Diversify and improve the economy including tourism 1. Promote sustainable recreational fishing and consumption of seafood dependent on Gulf ecosystem. and/or protect or promote working waterfronts

PROJECT SELECTION & RANKING PROCESS The following process is proposed to select and rank submitted projects. The process may need to be revised to comply with the final Treasury rules that have not yet been released. Step 1. Determine which projects are eligible for RESTORE Act funding under the Direct Component. Projects eligible include those that meet all four of the following criteria: 1. Within Pinellas County or adjacent surface and Gulf waters, or projects with an identified and strong benefit to the County. 2. Addressing one or more of the five Restoration Council Goals. 3. Addressing one or more RESTORE Act eligible activities. 4. Projects that are not fully funded. Step 2. Assign scores for each project using criteria and suggested guidelines. CRITERIA SCORE SUGGESTED GUIDELINES 1 Value of project in meeting Restoration Council goal(s) 2 1-3 The degree or how well the project meets one or more of the Council's five goals. Consider cost to benefit as part of value level score. 1 pt: Low value anticipated 2 pts: Medium value anticipated 3 pts: High value anticipated A project the addresses multiple Council goals will Number of Restoration Council goals clearly receive a higher score. addressed 1-2 1 pt: no (Addresses 1 Restoration Council goal) 2 pts: yes (Addresses 2 or more Restoration Council goals) The degree to which or how well the project meets 3 Value of project in meeting RESTORE Act eligible activity(ies) 4 Number of RESTORE Act eligible activities clearly addressed 5 Value of project in meeting RESTORE Act Pinellas County priority(ies) 6 7 Number of RESTORE Act County priorities clearly addressed 0-3 Provide countywide and/or regional benefits? 1-3 one or more of the RESTORE Act eligible activities. Consider cost to benefit as part of value level score. 1-3 1 pt: Low value anticipated 2 pts: Medium value anticipated 3 pts: High value anticipated -- A project that addresses multiple RESTORE Act eligible activities will receive a higher score for this criterion. 1-2 1 pt: Addresses 1 eligible activity 2 pts: Addresses 2 or more eligible activities -- The degree to which or how well the project meets one or more of the Pinellas County's priorities. Consider cost to benefit as part of value level score. 0-3 0 pt: Does not address any County priorities 1 pt: Low value anticipated 2 pts: Medium value anticipated 3 pts: High value anticipated ---:-:- A project that addresses multiple County priorities will receive a higher score for this criterion. 0 pt: Does not address any County priorities 1 pt: Addresses 1 County priority 2 pts: Addresses 2 or more County priorities 3 pts: Addresses 3 or more County priorities -- The geographical scope of the project. 1 pts: Benefits 1 jurisdiction, or no portions of unincorporated County 2 pts: Benefits 2-4 jurisdictions 3 pts: Benefits ~5 jurisdictions or all of unincorporated County; and/or highly supports regional efforts --

8 Utilizes a collaborative approach incorporating partnerships 9 10 0-1 Will strongly support and further County Comprehensive Plan Element goal attainment 0-2 as identified in the overarching project goals Long-term project benefits 1-3 11 Matching Funding 0-2 TOTAL POINTS PER PROJECT 6-27 The degree to which the project involves multiple city, county, or regional partners. 0 pt: No partners or 1 partner included 1 pt: 2 or more partners included 0 pt: No or low level of support of County Comp Plan goal(s) 1 pt: Moderate support of County Comp Plan goal(s) 2 pts: High/very strong support of County Comp Plan goal(s) 1 pt: Short term benefits anticipated (<5 years) 2 pt: Medium term benefits anticipated ( 5-10 years) 3 pt: Long term benefits anticipated (>10 years) -'-----1 0 pt: no matching funds secure 1 pt: at least 25% matching funds secured 2 pts: at least 50% matching funds secure d Step 3. Identify early action projects that can be completed within 5 years Step 4. Identify a per project funding cap if needed. The need to institute a project funding cap will depend upon the amount of funding available, the total funding amount requested, and Board of County Commissioner preference.

PINELLAS COUNTY RESTORE ACT DIRECT COMPONENT (POT #1) MULTIYEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT MAY 20, 2014

ITEMS TO COVER Milestones for Multiyear Implementation Plan (MYIP) County Project Goals and Priorities Project Selection and Ranking Process Next Steps

COMPLETED AND PROPOSED RESTORE ACT MILESTONES (Schedule Subject to Change) Nov:12 Develop draft set of goals and priorities Nov:13 Establish Working Group (under Sunshine ) to advise staff Jan:14 Hold Working Group kickoff meeting Apr:14 Develop recommended County goals & priorities and process to select and rank projects May:14 * Obtain BCC approval of County goals & priorities, and project selection & ranking process July:14 - Begin 3-month period to solicit project ideas & proposals Oct:14 - Select and rank projects for MYIP Nov:14 * Obtain BCC approval of selected projects and ranks Jan:15 * Obtain BCC approval of draft MYIP - Seek public comments on draft MYIP (30-60 days?) Mar:15 * Obtain BCC approval of final MYIP - Submit MYIP to U.S. Treasury

COUNTY RESTORE ACT PROJECT GOALS Projects/programs should: 1) provide or contribute to countywide and/or regional benefits, and 2) use a collaborative approach emphasizing environmental stewardship and sustainable practices All projects must meet one or more of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Goals: A. Restore and Conserve Habitat B. Restore Water Quality C. Replenish and Protect Living Coastal and Marine Resources D. Enhance Community Resilience E. Build and Revitalize the Gulf Ecosystem

COUNTY RESTORE ACT PROJECT GOALS Projects may also support, further, or implement goals as identified in the following Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan Elements Future Land Use and Quality Communities; Natural Resource Conservation and Management; Coastal Management; Recreation, Open Space and Culture; Economic

COUNTY RESTORE ACT PROJECT PRIORITIES a. Protect and restore native habitats b. Provide stormwater quality improvements c. Create policies, programs, and/or mechanisms to remediate environmental and/or economic damages d. Create policies, programs, and/or mechanisms to protect against future environmental and/or economic vulnerability e. Provide climate change/sea-level rise planning, adaptation and/or related community engagement f. Provide flood and storm protection to infrastructure and other publically owned assets that consider resilience and changing sea levels g. Implement or further actions in the Pinellas County Post Disaster Redevelopment Plan h. Diversify and improve the economy including tourism i. Promote sustainable recreational fishing and consumption of seafood dependent on Gulf ecosystem, and/or protect or promote working waterfronts

PROJECT SELECTION & RANKING PROCESS Step 1. Determine which projects are eligible for RESTORE Act funding under the Direct Component Projects eligible include those that meet all four of the following criteria: 1. Within Pinellas County or adjacent surface and Gulf waters, or projects with an identified and strong benefit to the County 2. Addressing one or more of the five Restoration Council Goals 3. Addressing one or more RESTORE Act eligible activities 4. Projects that are not fully funded. Step 2. Assign scores for each project using criteria and suggested guidelines

PROJECT SELECTION & RANKING PROCESS 1 Value of project in meeting Restoration Council goal(s) CRITERIA SCORE SUGGESTED GUIDELINES 2 Number of Restoration Council goals clearly addressed 3 Value of project in meeting RESTORE Act eligible activity(ies) 1 3 1 3 1 pt: Low value anticipated 2 pts: Medium value anticipated 3 pts: High value anticipated 1 2 1 pt: no (Addresses 1 Restoration Council goal) 2 pts: yes (Addresses 2 or more Restoration Council goals) 1 pt: Low value anticipated 2 pts: Medium value anticipated 3 pts: High value anticipated 4 Number of RESTORE Act eligible activities clearly addressed 1 2 1 pt: Addresses 1 eligible activity 2 pts: Addresses 2 or more eligible activities 5 Value of project in meeting RESTORE Act Pinellas County priority(ies) 0 3 6 Number of RESTORE Act County priorities clearly addressed 0 3 0 pt: Does not address any County priorities 1 pt: Low value anticipated 2 pts: Medium value anticipated 3 pts: High value anticipated 0 pt: Does not address any County priorities 1 pt: Addresses 1 County priority 2 pts: Addresses 2 or more County priorities 3 pts: Addresses 3 or more County priorities

PROJECT SELECTION & RANKING PROCESS CRITERIA SCORE SUGGESTED GUIDELINES 7 Provide countywide and/or regional benefits? 1 3 1 pts: Benefits 1 jurisdiction, or no portions of unincorporated County 2 pts: Benefits 2-4 jurisdictions 3 pts: Benefits 5 jurisdictions or all of unincorporated County; and/or highly supports regional efforts 8 Utilizes a collaborative approach incorporating partnerships 0 1 0 pt: No partners or 1 partner included 1 pt: 2 or more partners included 9 Will strongly support and further County Comprehensive Plan Element goal attainment as identified in the overarching project goals 0 2 10 Long-term project benefits 1 3 0 pt: No or low level of support of County Comp Plan goal(s) 1 pt: Moderate support of County Comp Plan goal(s) 2 pts: High/very strong support of County Comp Plan goal(s) 1 pt: Short term benefits anticipated (<5 years) 2 pt: Medium term benefits anticipated (5-10 years) 3 pt: Long term benefits anticipated (>10 years) 11 Matching Funding 0 2 TOTAL POINTS PER PROJECT 6 27 0 pt: no matching funds secure 1 pt: at least 25% matching funds secured 2 pts: at least 50% matching funds secure

PROJECT SELECTION & RANKING PROCESS Step 3. Identify early action projects that can be completed within 5 years. Step 4. Identify a per project funding cap if needed. The need to institute a project funding cap will depend upon the amount of funding available, the total funding amount requested, and Board of County Commissioner preference.

REQUEST THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION: Approve the proposed Pinellas County RESTORE Act goals and priorities and the RESTORE Act project selection and ranking process as recommended by staff and the RESTORE Act Working Group

NEXT STEPS Develop and activate a web-based project submittal page project ideas project proposals Submittal acceptance period (3-4 months) Select and rank projects by County staff with assistance from Working Group subcommittee Develop MYIP for BCC and U.S. Treasury approvals that incorporates a set of ranked projects