Since the mid-1990s, 26 states have

Similar documents
Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Developmental screening, referral and linkage to services: Lessons from ABCD

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

Advanced Nurse Practitioner Supervision Policy

Role of State Legislators

Medicaid Managed Care 2012 Fiscal Analysts Seminar August 30, 2012

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Policies for TANF Families Served Under the CCDF Child Care Subsidy Program

National Committee for Quality Assurance

National Perspective No Wrong Door System. Administration for Community Living Center for Medicare and Medicaid Veterans Health Administration

Poverty and Health. Frank Belmonte, D.O., MPH Vice President Pediatric Population Health and Care Modeling

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

NCHIP and NICS Act Grants Overview and Current Status

National Provider Identifier (NPI)

MapInfo Routing J Server. United States Data Information

Assuring Better Child Health and Development Initiative (ABCD)

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice Readiness Assessment

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

The Next Wave in Balancing Long- Term Care Services and Supports:

Governor s Office of Electronic Health Information (GOEHI) The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare

Driving Change with the Health Care Spending Benchmark

States Roles in Rebalancing Long-Term Care: Findings from the Aging Strategic Alignment Project

BUFFALO S SHIPPING POST Serving Napa Valley Since 1992

Value based care: A system overhaul

Medicaid: Current Challenges and Future Prospects

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Tagalicod, Robert Anthony, and Jessica Kahn HIT Policy Committee January 10, 2012

BEST PRACTICES IN LIFESPAN RESPITE SYSTEMS: LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE DIRECTIONS

National Association For Regulatory Administration

CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW BY STATE

FIELD BY FIELD INSTRUCTIONS

Care Provider Demographic Information Update

Options Counseling in and NWD/ADRC System National, State & Local Perspectives

Single Family Loan Sale ( SFLS )

The Legacy of Sidney Katz: Setting the Stage for Systematic Research in Long Term Care. Vincent Mor, Ph.D. Brown University

Prescription Monitoring Program:

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

Radiation Therapy Id Project. Data Access Manual. May 2016

2016 Edition. Upper Payment Limits and Medicaid Capitation Rates for Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE )

Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 2016

Summary of 2011 National Radon Action Month Results

Summary of 2010 National Radon Action Month Results

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)

50 STATE COMPARISONS

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

NEWS RELEASE. Air Force JROTC Distinguished Unit Award. MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. Unit OK at Union High School, Tulsa OK, has been

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Project

Medicaid Reform: The Opportunities for Home and Community Based Providers. All Rights Reserved

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF CARE IN SOUTH CAROLINA S MEDICAID PROGRAM

The 2015 National Workforce Survey Maryland LPN Data June 17, 2016

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice management

RECOUNT RULES & VOTING SYSTEMS

Health Reform and The Patient-Centered Medical Home

Cesarean Delivery Model Meeting the challenge to reduce rates of Cesarean delivery

National School Safety Conference Reno, Nevada / June 24 29, 2018

DoD-State Liaison Update NCSL August 2015

Advancing Self-Direction for People with Head Injuries

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

APPENDIX c WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES

NCCP. National Continued Competency Program Overview

NC TIDE SPRING CONFERENCE April 26, NC Department of Health and Human Services Medicaid Transformation and the 1115 Waiver

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

Prescription Monitoring Programs - Legislative Trends and Model Law Revision

2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK. Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate

Advancing Health Equity and Improving Health for All through a Systems Approach Presentation to the Public Health Association of Nebraska

Counterdrug(CD) Information Brief LTC TACKETT

Higher Education Employment Report

The Affordable Care Act and Its Potential to Reduce Health Disparities Cara V. James, Ph.D.

Congressional Gold Medal Application

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

State Partnership Performance Measures

2011 Nurse Licensee Volume and NCLEX Examination Statistics

Democracy from Afar. States Show Progress on Military and Overseas Voting

Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference. June 23 24, 2014

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS. Panelist: Dr. Donna Peebles Associate Director

State Innovations in Value-Based Care: ACOs and Beyond

The Value and Use of CME in Medical Licensure

Understanding Medicaid: A Primer for State Legislators

United States Property & Fiscal Officer (USPFO)

The Journey to Meaningful Use: Where we were, where we are, and where we may be going

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality /Survey & Certification

2010 Agribusiness Job Report

131,,000 homeless veterans on any given night 300,000 homeless veterans during the year 23% of the total number of homeless people are veterans

2012 Federation of State Medical Boards

Diversifying AAA/ADRCs Funding Streams: How states and their local partners can draw down federal Medicaid Administrative Match for ADRC/NWD Systems

2017 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to 401 STSW members and conference registrants. 181 social workers responded.

SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION STATUS REPORT NO. 2

+ This Presentation at a Glance

Safe Staffing- Safe Work

NCQA PCMH Recognition: 2017 Standards Preview. Tricia Barrett Vice President, Product Design and Support January 25, 2017

Adult Day Health Services Across States: Results from a 50-State Survey of State Health Policies

Listed below are the states in which GIFT has registered to solicit charitable donations and includes the registration number assigned by each state.

A National Role Delineation Study of the Pediatric Emergency Nurse. Executive Summary

Addressing the Shortage of Maternal Care Providers

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

Current and Emerging Rural Issues in Medicare

Transcription:

IN THIS BRIEFING: medicaid, family planning, 1115 waivers, eligibility, enrollment state health policy Briefing a p u b l i c a t i o n o f t h e N a t i o n a l a c a d e m y f o r s t a t e h e a l t h p o l i c y December 2007 Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States Sara R. Sills Since the mid-1990s, 26 states have implemented Medicaid Section 1115 family planning demonstration waivers to help low-income women avoid unintended pregnancy and improve child and maternal health outcomes. These waivers have saved states millions of dollars. The waiver programs, which require approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), provide access to family planning services for individuals not otherwise eligible for Medicaid or the State Children s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). This State Health Policy Briefing is the third in a NASHP series examining Medicaid family planning demonstration waivers. 1 It explores some of the design choices states face when applying for and implementing a waiver choices about State Health Policy Briefing provides an overview and analysis of emerging issues and developments in state health policy. Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States, State Health Policy Briefing, Vol. 1, Issue 4 (Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy, December 2007), Publication No. 2007-112. This Briefing was produced with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. whom the program should cover, how it should cover them, and how states can ensure that clients receive the services they need. Key issues are: Eligibility. Enrollment should individuals be automatically enrolled in the program or should they have to apply for coverage? Gender should the program provide services to both women and men? Age at what ages are people eligible? Primary care outreach what mechanisms do states family planning clinics use to refer clients to primary care physicians and to document that process? It is important to note that a waiver program may not be needed in every state. For example, some states such as Vermont and Minnesota expanded Medicaid eligibility for parents and children at higher income levels, as well as childless adults, who are rarely covered under Medicaid otherwise. Other states may have existing programs through which women of childbearing age can access family planning services, such as Title X Federal Family Planning Programs. Often, however, these programs operate with low funding. Eligibility Eligibility for Medicaid Section 1115 family planning demonstrations varies by state, and follows one of three models: extending coverage to women losing Medicaid coverage postpartum, extending coverage to those who lose Medicaid for any reason, or providing coverage to everyone under a certain income level. Medicaid Family Planning Demonstration: Design Issues and Resources for States [ 1 ]

[ 2 ] Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States Figure 1. States Using Medicaid Family Planning Waivers, with Year First Implemented WA 2001 MT ND ME OR 1999 ID WY SD MN 2006 WI 2003 MI 2006 NY* 1997 VT NH MA CT RI- 1994 CA 1999 NV UT CO NE KS IA* 2006 MO 1999 IL* 2004 IN KY OH WV PA VA 2002 NJ DE- 1996 MD- 1995 AK AZ 1995 AR 1997 NM OK 1998 2005 TX 2007 MS 2003 TN AL 2000 GA SC 1994 NC 2005 No family planning waiver (24) Income-based (20*) Postpartum (4) Loss lof Medicaid (2) HI FL 1998 * IA, IL, NY also provide coverage to women losing Medicaid coverage after a Medicaid-funded delivery Source: The Guttmacher Institute. State Policies in Brief: State Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions. August 2007. i i Available at http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_smfpe.pdf. EXTENDING POSTPARTUM COVERAGE The first Medicaid family planning waiver programs provided coverage to women losing Medicaid coverage after a Medicaid-funded delivery. 2 Under Medicaid, states are required to cover pregnant women up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), and may cover women at higher incomes. Coverage includes pregnancy-related care and 60 days of postpartum coverage, after which most women become ineligible for Medicaid. States use these waiver programs to provide extended family planning coverage to this group of women for anywhere from one to five years. The coverage helps women avoid future unintended pregnancies, as well as lengthen the time between planned births. Increased spacing between births is a factor strongly associated with improved maternal and child health outcomes. FOLLOWING LOSS OF MEDICAID FOR ANY REASON In May 1995, Delaware received waiver approval from CMS to extend Medicaid family planning coverage to women losing Medicaid for any reason. The state recognized that this population of women is likely to become eligible for Medicaid again if they become pregnant. Access to family planning care was seen as a way to help these women avoid unintended pregnancy, thus providing benefits to both the women and the state. Illinois also instituted a waiver using this model, but later changed it to an income-based program. Florida recently moved to this type of model from one based more narrowly on providing coverage postpartum. INCOME-BASED Twenty states use waivers with a broad-based eligibility model. Individuals are eligible for services as long as their incomes are below a certain level, generally up to 185 percent or 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). California began its family planning program with this model in the 1990s using only state funds, and received federal waiver approval in December 1999. Nineteen other states now use income-based eligibility as the basis for enrollment in their About the National Academy for State Health Policy The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) is an independent academy of state health policy makers working together to identify emerging issues, develop policy solutions, and improve state health policy and practice. As a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to helping states achieve excellence in health policy and practice, NASHP provides a forum on critical health issues across branches and agencies of state government. NASHP resources available at: www.nashp.org Portland, Maine Office: 50 Monument Square, Suite 502, Portland ME 04101 Phone: (207) 874-6524 Washington, D.C. Office: 1233 20th St., NW, Suite 303, Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 903-0101

Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States [ 3 ] family planning programs. Because of their broad scope, these waivers are likely to have the highest enrollment levels, and, consequently, accrue the most savings for state Medicaid programs. States provide family planning services not only to women who have recently given birth, but to a larger group of women who would become eligible for Medicaid if they became pregnant. In fact, some states that originally had waivers covering women postpartum, such as South Carolina and New York, have expanded their waivers to income-based eligibility. Enrollment: Automatic versus Active In states where women become eligible for waiver services following a Medicaid-funded delivery, an important issue to consider is whether to automatically enroll clients in the program or require them to actively apply for coverage. Automatic enrollment allows eligible women to have immediate coverage for family planning services following pregnancy. Having to apply may dissuade clients from starting or following through with the process, particularly if the application is administratively burdensome or requires in-person appointments. Further, in light of new citizenship documentation requirements, low-income persons may have an even more difficult time applying for Medicaid. The provision, enacted as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, stipulates that states must ensure that Medicaid enrollees provide proof of their citizenship through documents such as passports, driver s licenses, and birth certificates. Eligible low-income individuals may not always possess or have ready access to these documents. If states use automatic enrollment, though, CMS does allow them to access existing government data to verify enrollees citizenship, rather than requesting proof of original documents. 3 At the same time, some states have found that service use is low among women who are automatically enrolled. Women who do not have to complete an application may not be aware of their coverage or interested in accessing family planning care, resulting in lower rates of service use. For example, Washington State s Take Charge program provides coverage to eligible individuals with incomes at or below 200 percent FPL. The state automatically enrolls into the program women who have Medicaid-funded deliveries, but requires other eligible women and men to actively enroll. An interim evaluation of the state program found that 94 percent of clients who actively enrolled had used services, compared with only 55 percent of women who were automatically enrolled. 4 Likewise, Florida s family planning program first used automatic enrollment, but the state found that a low percentage of enrollees used services. In 2002-03, the last year of Florida s original demonstration period, only 22 percent of enrolled women used services under the waiver. 5 As of 2003, with approval from CMS, the state began requiring women to apply for coverage with the hope of increasing service use. There may be higher administrative costs involved with active enrollment. However, these costs may be partially offset by the savings to the Medicaid program that accrue as a result of averting births. Regardless of whether or not states use automatic enrollment, there are steps they can take to increase enrollment and service use, such as: Streamline eligibility criteria by implementing or shifting to an income-based eligibility model. Implement presumptive eligibility, which allows for temporarily covering enrollees while their formal eligibility is being determined. Create simplified, specialized application forms to expedite the enrollment process, and allow clients to apply at the site of care. Use local and statewide media campaigns to encourage enrollment. Partner Medicaid family planning programs with statefunded pregnancy prevention programs. Target outreach to enrolled individuals to educate them about their coverage Target outreach to providers, particularly those who serve high-risk populations, to educate them about the opportunities and limitations of family planning waiver coverage. This may increase provider participation in the program, as well as enlist providers in informing and assisting their patients. Coverage for Both Men and Women? Family planning efforts have historically provided services to both men and women, but men comprise a very small proportion of clients. Few reproductive health and family planning initiatives are targeted to them. 6 As a result, many men lack access to the full range of contraceptive options, as well as contraceptive counseling. 7 The Guttmacher Insti-

[ 4 ] Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States Figure 2. Eight States Cover both Women and Men in Medicaid Family Planning Programs WA MT ND ME OR MN VT ID WY SD WI MI NY NH MA CT RI CA NV UT CO NE KS IA MO IL IN KY OH WV PA VA MD NJ DE NC AK AZ NM TX OK AR LA MS TN AL GA SC planning waivers that cover women only (18) planning waivers that cover men and women (8) HI FL Source: The Guttmacher Institute. State Policies in Brief: State Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions. (August 2007). tute found that men ages 25-49 are involved in 3.7 million pregnancies annually, 38 percent of which were unplanned. 8 Moreover, research shows that having a partner who supports contraceptive use is associated with more consistent and effective use of contraception, which helps women avoid unintended pregnancies. In addition, family planning services provided to men helps prevent the transmission of sexually transmitted infections. As of October 2007, eight states had Medicaid family planning waivers that cover men as well as women (California, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Virginia, and Washington). These states provide a range of family planning services for men, including family planning education, contraceptive counseling, contraception, screening for sexually transmitted infections, and vasectomies. Age The majority of states with family planning waivers cover individuals of childbearing age, which is generally defined as ages 15-44, though there is some variation. Two states only cover individuals over age 18 (Pennsylvania, Texas) and seven states only cover individuals over age 19 (Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oklahoma). Some states provide services to individuals at any age who are in need of family planning services. Excluding teens under the age of 19 from coverage under a waiver may diminish political opposition to family planning program expansions. However, limiting the waiver to individuals over age 18 or 19 can also weaken the state s efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy among an age group with high rates of unintended pregnancy. Eighty-two percent of all teen pregnancies are unplanned, and babies born to teens are more likely to be low-birth weight than babies born to older women with similar risk profiles. 9 Research by the Guttmacher Institute found that almost 750,000 women aged 15-19 become pregnant every year, and, in 2002, there were just over 250,000 pregnancies among 15-17 year olds alone. 10 States that do not restrict eligibility by age may do so because providing teens with access to family planning care through Medicaid waiver programs bolsters efforts to reduce unintended teen pregnancy with all its associated problems and costs: higher school dropout rates, welfare costs, poorer birth outcomes, and generally decreased opportunities for teen parents.

Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States [ 5 ] Figure 3. Nine States Limit Coverage under Medicaid Family Planning Waivers to Individuals at or above 18 or 19 Years of Age WA MT ND ME OR MN VT ID WY SD WI MI NY NH MA CT RI CA NV UT CO NE KS IA MO IL IN KY OH WV PA VA MD NJ DE NC AZ NM OK AR MS TN AL GA SC planning waivers that do not have age limits (17) AK HI TX LA FL planning waivers that limit services to individuals at or above 18 or 19 years of age (9) Source: The Guttmacher Institute. State Policies in Brief: State Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions. (August 2007). Primary Care Since 2001, CMS has required that states establish referral arrangements with primary care providers, so that waiver enrollees can be referred to primary care if necessary. States have not taken a standard approach to addressing this requirement. In general, states develop materials to inform clients about their options for accessing primary care, and family planning providers make referrals to primary care providers when a medical condition over and above family planning is identified during the course of a covered family planning visit. Some states also include letters of support from state community health care and primary care organizations in their waiver applications. A similar requirement has been part of the Title X Family Planning Program for the past 30 years. Title X is the only federal program devoted solely to providing family planning services to low-income individuals. As a result, this requirement has not been a burden for the many states that rely primarily on Title X clinics to provide services to individuals covered under the family planning waiver. However, outreach to private providers may need to be more intensive in states that allow enrollees to receive family planning care from any Medicaid provider, not just Title X clinics. In addition, CMS has recently begun requiring states to track whether providers in Medicaid family planning programs are making primary care referrals. This is a challenge for states that do not have systems in place for this type of tracking and documentation. Information Resources on Family Planning Waivers States considering seeking a family planning waiver should rely upon officials in states with existing waivers as a resource. With 26 states operating Medicaid family planning waivers, there is a wealth of knowledge and the benefit of lessons learned.

[ 6 ] Medicaid Family Planning Demonstrations: Design Issues and Resources for States Available information resources include: RESOURCE LIST A supplemental list of Resources for Family Planning Waivers is available on the NASHP Web site at: www.nashp.org/ Files/FPW_Resources_122007.pdf CMS MEDICAID WAIVERS AND DEMONSTRATIONS LIST CMS Medicaid Waivers and Demonstrations List (Waiver applications and materials from states with existing family planning waivers, including evaluations) http://www.cms. hhs.gov/medicaidstwaivprogdemopgi/mwdl/list.asp ORGANIZATIONS THAT PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE There are several non-profit organizations, including NASHP, that can help connect state officials with the appropriate contacts in other states, as well as provide targeted assistance to officials seeking to develop and apply for a Medicaid family planning waiver. They include: The Guttmacher Institute (www.guttmacher.org) National Academy for State Health Policy (www.nashp. org) National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association (www.nfprha.org) KEY PUBLICATIONS The Guttmacher Institute s State Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions (Updated monthly) http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_ SMFPE.pdf Estimating the Impact of Expanding Medicaid Eligibility for Family Planning Services (August 2006) http://www. guttmacher.org/pubs/2006/08/16/or28.pdf National Women s Law Center, Women and Medicaid Fact Sheet (May 2005) http://www.nwlc.org/pdf/ WomenMedicaidUpdateMay2005.pdf State Family Planning Administrators (SFPA), Informational Update on State Medicaid Family Planning Waivers (June 2003), available at http://www. sfpainfo.org Notes 1 For further information on how these programs create significant savings for state Medicaid programs, while helping women avoid unintended pregnancy and improving maternal and child health outcomes, please refer to previous briefs on the topic at www.nashp.org. 2 States are required to cover women for 60 days after a Medicaid-funded delivery. 3 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Proof of Citizenship Public Law and Final Rule, http://www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaideligibility/05_ ProofofCitizenship.asp, accessed October 8, 2007. 4 L. Cawthon, T. Keenan-Wilkie, D. Lyons, K Rust, Can Du. Take Charge Interim Evaluation. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. Washington: 2005. 5 Evaluation of Florida s Family Planning Waiver Program: Phase 1, 1998-2003. Maternal Child Health and Education Research and Data Center, College of Medicine, University of Florida. January 5, 2006. 6 F. Sonenstein, editor. Young men s sexual and reproductive health. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 2000. Available at: http://www. urban.org/uploadedpdf/young_mens_health.pdf. 7 D. Kalmus and C. Tatum, Patterns of Men s Use of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2007: (Volume 39, Number 2) p. 74-81. 8 The Guttmacher Institute. In Their Own Right (New York: 2002). 9 The Guttmacher Institute. Facts on American Teens Sexual and Reproductive Health. 10 The Guttmacher Institute, U.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics: National and State Trends and Trends by Race and Ethnicity, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2006/09/11/ustpstats.pdf, accessed July 23, 2007.