Definitions. interrai Quality Indicators

Similar documents
Quality Measures and the Five-Star Rating

Preparing for the 2015 QIS Changes in abaqis

Session #: R14. Robin L. Hillier. Agenda 4/9/2014. Simply Quality Measures. (330) RLH Consulting.

OASIS-C Home Health Outcome Measures

Using the InterRAI Data Visualisation

Quality Measures Are My Friends

FH16 - Developed by Polaris Group Page 1 of 140

Percentage of Short-Stay Residents who were Re-hospitalized after a Nursing Home Admission

Attachment C: Itemized List of OASIS Data Elements

OASIS-B1 and OASIS-C Items Unchanged, Items Modified, Items Dropped, and New Items Added.

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

Quality Measures (QM) & Five Star Rating System. Objectives 4/18/2016 MDS CODING FOR QUALITY MEASURES

3/12/2015. Session Objectives. RAI User s Manual. Polling Question

Michigan Medicaid Nursing Facility Level of Care Determination

Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that:

Navigating the New CMS Quality Measures

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURES

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MDS 3.0 QUALITY MEASURES

Understanding the New MDS 3.0 Quality Measures. Updated May 2017

G0110: Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance

Quality Outcomes and Data Collection

Discharge to Community Measure

MDS 3.0: What Leadership Needs to Know

FY17 LONG TERM CARE RISK ADJUSTMENT

RAPID RUG GUIDE RUG-III, VERSION GROUPER Effective for Assessments With an ARD on or After 10/1/2013

AGING & PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 4 ADL CA/PS ASSESSMENT POST 10/1/17

Understanding the Five Star Quality Rating System Design For Nursing Home Compare

Attachment A - Comparison of OASIS-C (Current Version) to OASIS-C1 (Proposed Data Collection)

Acute Care to Rehab & Complex Continuing Care (CCC) Referral

On-Time Quality Improvement Manual for Long-Term Care Facilities Tools

Initial Pool Process: Resident Interview

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

RUG-III V ERSION 5.20 CALCULATION WORKSH E E T 34 GROUP MOD E L F OR MDS 3.0

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Guidance: Personal Care Assistance Service Agreement Fields

11/23/2011. Proactive vs. Reactive Relationship

Outcome Based Case Conference

Skills Standards RESIDENTIAL CARE AIDE OD68604 MEETS OSDH NURSE AIDE REGISTRY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Restorative Nursing: The NHA s Role and Organizational Outcomes

Hospice and End of Life Care and Services Critical Element Pathway

Dazed and Confused: Initial Results from the IRF QRP Data

NURSING HOME PRE-ADMISSION ASSESSMENT FORM

OAR Changes. Presented by APD Medicaid LTC Policy

CAP/DA Services - NEW Request

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

CASPER Reports. Objectives: What is Casper? 4/27/2012. Certification And Survey Provider Enhanced Reports

Nursing Assistant

What s Happening in the Nursing Home? Cherry Meier, RN, MSN, NHA Vice President of Public Affairs

5/26/2016. What's New? What's Changed? Urgent Updates QM Manual v10. Faculty Disclosure. Requirements for Successful Completion

Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that:

Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Critical Element Pathway

Rhode Island HEALTH. Continuity of Care Form. Referral to: Phone:

NJ Level of Care and Assessment Process

The Royal Hospital Donnybrook Referral Form

A Closer Look at the Revised Nursing Facility Regulations. Quality of Care

interrai New Zealand National Standards

PA Assessment System (PAS) Project Overview

Listed below are additional coding tips: you think the patient can do or what the patient s potential is. your shift, even if it only occurs once.

Agenda: Noon Overview of the regulatory sections affected by the Reform of RoP in Phase 2

11/23/2011. Identify Residents risks for decline to establish programs to stave off decline unless it is clinically unavoidable.

Tube Feeding Status Critical Element Pathway

POSITION SUMMARY. 2. Communicates: Reads, writes and speaks in English as required for taking direction and performing job-related activities.

Target as stated on QIP 2015/16. Current Performance as stated on QIP2015/16

Provider Rate Table Residential Habilitation Services in a Licensed Facility Effective April 1, 2011

NORTH DAKOTA LEVEL OF CARE FORM INSTRUCTIONS TO BE USED WITH LOC FORM ND

Critical Thinking Steps

Older Person's Assessment Form. Name: Contact details: Provide detail: Detail: Detail: Detail: Detail:

Service Plan for: Carine Schmitt Richmond - North 1. This Service has been reviewed by the following: Resident: Responsible Party: Administrator:

MDS 3.0/RUG IV OVERVIEW

Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Ratings of Nursing Homes Provider Rating Report

Executive Summary. This Project

Inspection Protocol Skin and Wound Care. Definition / Description. Use. Resident-related Triggered

US Health Health Policy

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

LSSCC Action Period 1: Composite Score Reports June 25, 2015

CNA OnSite Series Overview: Understanding Restorative Care Part 1 - Introduction to Restorative Care

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

Results from the Green House Evaluation in Tupelo, MS

(M1025) Case-Mix Diagnosis (Optional) OPTIONAL Complete only if a Z-code in Column 2 is reported in place of a resolved condition

Session Objectives. Long Term Care Luncheon: The CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System. Quality Ratings of U.S. Nursing Homes on Nursing Home Compare

ADMISSION CARE PLAN. Orient PRN to person, place, & time

CMS s RAI Version 3.0 Manual October 2016

Table of Contents. Foundation: Understand the Basics 4. Tools: Put the Pieces Together 21. Solve: Learn by Example 38. Printable Tools 56

Connecticut LTC Level of Care Determination Form To be maintained in the individual s medical record.

NM DDSD Intensive Medical Living Services Eligibility Parameter Tool A. MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION SEVERE 4 SIGNIFICANT 3 MODERATE 2 LOW 1 NONE - 0

LONG TERM CARE ASSISTANT Course Syllabus. Mosby's Textbook for Long Term Care Nursing Assistant 7th Ed., Mosby Evolve (2015).

APD & MHA RESIDENT SCREENING SHEET

SKILLED NURSING HOME RISK MONITOR METRICS

RESIDENT SCREENING SHEET

Notes from CMS Final Rule Document Pertinent to Culture Change and Person-directed Care

ehealth Ireland Ecosystem members of the ECHAlliance International Ecosystem Network

Maggie Turner RN RAC-CT Kara Schilling RN RAC-CT Lisa Gourley RN RAC-CT

Family Caregivers in dementia. Dr Roland Ikuta MD, FRCP Geriatric Medicine

Evidence-Based Medicine and Long- Term Care: Improving Outcomes in Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Methodology Report U.S. News & World Report Nursing Home Finder

Understanding Your CARE Tool Assessment. September 2010 for equal justice

Chances are.. Based on my experience MDS 3.0 Update for Long Term Care PRESENTED BY 2/13/2017. New focus on Data by CMS and Regulatory Agencies

*PLEASE NOTE THAT COMPLETION OF THE PRE-ADMISSION FORM DOES NOT GUARANTEE PLACEMENT AT THIS FACILITY.

Facility-Based Continuing Care in Canada, An Emerging Portrait of the Continuum

Objectives 2/23/2011. Crossing Paths Intersection of Risk Adjustment and Coding

Transcription:

Definitions interrai Quality Indicators May 2018

Contents Introduction... 3 Prevalence General rules... 4 Prevalence... 4 QI10: Percent of residents with indwelling catheters... 4 QI13: Percent of residents with a urinary tract infection... 4 QI22: Percent of residents who have fallen in the last 30 days... 5 QI27: Percent of residents with a feeding tube... 5 QI28: Percent of residents with pain... 5 QI31: Percent of residents who have a Pressure Ulcer Stage 2 to 4... 6 QI33: Percent of residents in physical restraints... 6 QI35: Percent of residents who have unexplained weight loss... 6 Incidence General rules... 7 Incidence Declined... 7 QI01: Percent of residents who had an unexpected loss of function in some basic daily activities... 7 QI06: Percent of residents who declined status on mid-loss ADL functioning transfer, locomotion or remain completely dependent in mid-loss ADLs... 8 QI07: Percent of residents who declined status on early-loss ADL functioning (dressing and personal hygiene) or remain completely dependent in early-loss ADLs (ELADL)... 8 QI08: Percent of residents who have declined in ADLs... 9 QI09: Percent of residents who have declining behavioural symptoms... 9 QI11: Percent of residents with worsening bowel continence... 9 QI12: Percent of residents with worsening bladder continence... 10 QI16: Percent of residents whose cognitive ability has worsened... 10 QI18: Percent of residents whose ability to communicate has worsened... 11 QI24: Percent of residents who have declined in their ability to locomote... 11 QI29: Percent of residents with worsening pain (Worsening pain)... 12 QI30: Percent of residents with worsening stage 2-4 pressure sores (Worsening stage 2-4 pressure sores)... 12 QI32: Percent of residents who have a newly occurring pressure ulcer stage 2 to 4 (Newly occurring pressure ulcer stage 2 to 4)... 13 Incidence Improved... 14 QI03: Percent of residents who improve status on mid-loss functioning transfer, or remain completely independent in mid-loss ADLs... 14 QI04: Percent of residents who improve status on early-loss ADL functioning (dressing and personal hygiene) or remain completely independent in early-loss ADLs (ELADL)... 15 QI05: Percent of residents who had an improvement of function in some basic daily activities... 15 1 of 18

QI14: Percent of residents with improving bowel continence... 16 QI15: Percent of residents with improving bladder continence... 16 QI17: Percent of residents whose cognitive ability has improved... 17 QI19: Percent of residents whose ability to communicate has improved... 17 QI25: Percent of residents who have improved in their ability to locomote... 18 QI36: Percent of residents who have improved behavioural symptoms... 18 2 of 18

Introduction This document describes the algorithm calculation for the Long Term Care Facility Quality Indicators (LTCF QIs). There are two types of QIs: Prevalence o o Incidence o o The number of assessments that met a certain criteria within a time period Only requires one assessment per resident. The percentage of assessments that change for a certain criteria Requires two assessments per resident. 3 of 18

Prevalence General rules Assessment type is LTCF The reporting period is quarterly (three months) First assessments are excluded If a resident has more than one assessment during a quarter, then only the latest assessment is included. Prevalence QI10: Percent of residents with indwelling catheters H2. Urinary collection device = 2. Indwelling catheter H2. Urinary collection device, not answered QI13: Percent of residents with a urinary tract infection I1s. Disease diagnosis - Urinary tract infection = 1. Primary diagnosis / diagnoses for current stay or 2. Diagnosis present, receiving active treatment or 3. Diagnosis present, monitored but no active treatment I1s. Disease diagnosis - Urinary tract infection, not answered 4 of 18

QI22: Percent of residents who have fallen in the last 30 days J1. Falls = 2. One fall in last 30 days or 3. Two or more falls in last 30 days J1. Falls, not answered QI27: Percent of residents with a feeding tube K3. Mode of nutritional intake = 5. Combined oral and parenteral or tube feeding or 6. Nasogastric tube feeding only or 7. Abdominal feeding tube O2m. Treatments and programmes - Palliative care = 2. 1-2 of last or 3. Daily in last 3 days K3. Mode of nutritional intake, has not been populated QI28: Percent of residents with pain (J6a. Pain frequency = 3. Exhibited daily in last and J6b. Pain intensity = 2. Moderate ) or J6b. Pain intensity = 3. Severe or 4. Times when pain is horrible or excruciating J6a. Pain frequency, not answered J6b. Pain intensity, not answered J6a. Pain frequency = 0. No Pain and J6b. Pain intensity = 1. Mild or 2. Moderate or 3. Severe or 4. Times when pain is horrible or excruciating 5 of 18

QI31: Percent of residents who have a Pressure Ulcer Stage 2 to 4 L1. Most severe pressure ulcer = 2. Partial loss of skin layers or 3. Deep craters in the skin or 4. Breaks in skin exposing muscle or bone or 5. Not codeable Comments Includes 5. Not codeable (this differs from original definition) No exclusions. QI33: Percent of residents in physical restraints O7b. Trunk restraint = 2. Used daily-nights only or 3. Used daily-days only or 4. Used night and days but not constant or 5. Constant use for full 24 hours answered or O7c. Chair prevents rising restraint = 2. Used daily-nights only or 3. Used daily-days only or 4. Used night and days but not constant or 5. Constant use for full 24 hours Comments Ignore limb restraint as not in LTCF (this differs from original definition) O7b. Trunk restraint, not answered or (ignore limb restraint as not in LTCF) or O7c. Chair prevents rising, not answered I1i. Disease diagnosis - Quadriplegia = 1. Primary diagnosis or 2. Diagnosis present, receiving active treatment or 3. Diagnosis present, monitored but no active treatment QI35: Percent of residents who have unexplained weight loss K2a. Weight loss = 1 K2a. Weight loss, not answered 6 of 18

Incidence General rules The assessment type is LTCF. The reporting period is quarterly (three months). If both assessments are recorded as first assessments then client is excluded. If a resident has more than two assessments in a quarter, then each client is only counted once in each quarter. A client may be counted in more than one quarter (the same previous assessment could theoretically be used for more than one quarter if it met all of the rules below). To identify the two assessments for each resident the following join rules are followed: o The NHIs are the same. o The facilities (Momentum ID) are the same. o The two assessment dates must be more than 90 days and less than 330 days apart. This is a change from the original definition. In Canada LTCF assessments occur every three months and hence the parameters were more than 45 days and less than 165 days apart. o The latest assessment needs to occur in the current reporting quarter. Another change to the original definition is that to ignore the following rule as it does not make sense in a NZ context. The previous assessment needs to have occurred in the previous quarter. Incidence Declined QI01: Percent of residents who had an unexpected loss of function in some basic daily activities If two or more ADLs (bed mobility, transfer toilet, eating, toilet use) have worsened by one point, or one or more ADLs have worsened by two points (Previous) G1i. ADL self performance - bed mobility, not answered, or G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1j. ADL self performance Eating, not answered, or G1h. ADL self performance - Toilet use, not answered G1i. ADL self performance - bed mobility, not answered, or G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1j. ADL self performance Eating, not answered, or G1h. ADL self performance - Toilet use, not answered (previous) All of the four questions = 6. Total dependence, or 8. Activity did not occur during entire period 7 of 18

QI06: Percent of residents who declined status on mid-loss ADL functioning transfer, locomotion or remain completely dependent in mid-loss ADLs If the three ADLs (transfer toilet, walking, locomotion) stay as total dependent, or the sum of the three ADLs worsened. G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1e. ADL self performance - Walking, not answered, or G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered (previous) (G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1e. ADL self performance - Walking, not answered, or G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered) AND (G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet + G1e. ADL self performance Walking + G1f. ADL self performance Locomotion) > 0 QI07: Percent of residents who declined status on early-loss ADL functioning (dressing and personal hygiene) or remain completely dependent in early-loss ADLs (ELADL) If the three ADLs (dressing upper body, dressing lower body, personal hygiene) stay as total dependent, or the sum of the three ADLs worsen. G1c. ADL self performance - Dressing upper body, not answered, or G1d. ADL self performance - Dressing lower body, not answered, or G1b. ADL self performance - Personal Hygiene, not answered (previous) (G1c. ADL self performance - Dressing upper body, not answered, or G1d. ADL self performance - Dressing lower body, not answered, or G1b. ADL self performance - Personal Hygiene, not answered) AND (G1c. ADL self performance - Dressing upper body >1 or G1d. ADL self performance - Dressing lower body >1 or G1b. ADL self performance - Personal Hygiene >1) 8 of 18

QI08: Percent of residents who have declined in ADLs ADL long form has worsened (previous) ADL long form is not calculated ADL long form is not calculated QI09: Percent of residents who have declining behavioural symptoms Sum of behavioural measures have worsened (wandering, verbal abuse, physical abuse, socially inappropriate, sexual behaviour inappropriate) Any behavioural measure is not answered QI11: Percent of residents with worsening bowel continence Worsening bowel continence (previous) H3. Bowel continence = 5. Incontinent H3. Bowel continence, not answered (previous) H3. Bowel continence, not answered AND H3. Bowel continence = some level of incontinence H4. Ostomy, not answered, or 1. Yes 9 of 18

QI12: Percent of residents with worsening bladder continence Worsening bladder continence (previous) H1. Bladder continence = 5. Incontinent H1. Bladder continence, not answered (previous) H1. Bladder continence, not answered, AND H1. Bladder continence = some level of incontinence QI16: Percent of residents whose cognitive ability has worsened CPS score has worsened (previous) CPS, not calculated AND CPS > 0 CPS, not calculated (previous) CPS = 6. Very severe impairment 10 of 18

QI18: Percent of residents whose ability to communicate has worsened Sum of D1. Making self understood, and D2. Ability to understand others, has worsened D1. Making self understood, not answered OR D2. Ability to understand others, not answered (previous) (D1. Making self understood, not answered OR D2. Ability to understand others, not answered) AND (D1 + D2 > 0) (previous) o o D1. Making self understood = 4. Rarely or never understood AND D2. Ability to understand others = 4. Rarely or never understands QI24: Percent of residents who have declined in their ability to locomote Locomotion has declined (previous) G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion = 6. Total dependence G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered (previous) G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered AND G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion > 1 (not independent) 11 of 18

QI26: Percent of residents who decline in mood from symptoms of depression (based on MDS Depression Rating Scale) DRS has declined (previous) DRS = 14 DRS, not calculated (previous) DRS, not calculated AND DRS > 0 QI29: Percent of residents with worsening pain (Worsening pain) Pain score has worsened Status: Draft SQL in progress Comments: Why exclude previous Pain = 3 (max value is 4. Daily excruciating pain) (previous) Pain = 3. Daily severe pain Pain, not calculated (previous) Pain, not calculated AND Pain > 0 = QI30: Percent of residents with worsening stage 2-4 pressure sores (Worsening stage 2-4 pressure sores) Pressure sores have worsened, current pressure score >1, previous pressure score was 0,1,2,3 Comments: Differing title and code to master list L1. Most severe pressure ulcer, not answered (previous) L1. Most severe pressure ulcer, not answered and L1. Most severe pressure ulcer > 0 (no pressure ulcer) (previous) L1. Most severe pressure ulcer = 4. Breaks in skin exposing muscle or bone, or 5. Not codeable 12 of 18

QI32: Percent of residents who have a newly occurring pressure ulcer stage 2 to 4 (Newly occurring pressure ulcer stage 2 to 4) (Previous) L1. Most severe pressure ulcer = 0. No pressure ulcer, or 1. Any area of persistent skin redness L1. Most severe pressure ulcer >= 2 L1. Most severe pressure ulcer, not answered (previous) L1. Most severe pressure ulcer >= 2 13 of 18

Incidence Improved QI03: Percent of residents who improve status on mid-loss functioning transfer, or remain completely independent in mid-loss ADLs If the three ADLs (transfer toilet, walking, locomotion) stay as either 0 or 1, or the sum of the three ADLs improve. G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1e. ADL self performance - Walking, not answered, or G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered (previous) (G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1e. ADL self performance - Walking, not answered, or G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered) AND (G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet + G1e. ADL self performance Walking + G1f. ADL self performance Locomotion) > 0 14 of 18

QI04: Percent of residents who improve status on early-loss ADL functioning (dressing and personal hygiene) or remain completely independent in early-loss ADLs (ELADL) If the three ADLs (dressing upper body, dressing lower body, personal hygiene) stay as either 0 or 1, or the sum of the three ADLs improve. G1c. ADL self performance - Dressing upper body, not answered, or G1d. ADL self performance - Dressing lower body, not answered, or G1b. ADL self performance - Personal Hygiene, not answered (previous) (G1c. ADL self performance - Dressing upper body, not answered, or G1d. ADL self performance - Dressing lower body, not answered, or G1b. ADL self performance - Personal Hygiene, not answered) AND (G1c. ADL self performance - Dressing upper body >1 or G1d. ADL self performance - Dressing lower body >1 or G1b. ADL self performance - Personal Hygiene >1) QI05: Percent of residents who had an improvement of function in some basic daily activities If two or more ADLs (bed mobility, transfer toilet, eating, toilet use) have improved by one point, or one or more ADLs have improved by two points (Previous) G1i. ADL self performance - bed mobility, not answered, or G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1j. ADL self performance Eating, not answered, or G1h. ADL self performance - Toilet use, not answered G1i. ADL self performance - bed mobility, not answered, or G1g. ADL self performance - Transfer toilet, not answered, or G1j. ADL self performance Eating, not answered, or G1h. ADL self performance - Toilet use, not answered (previous) All of the four questions = 0. Independent, or 1. Independent, setup help only 15 of 18

QI14: Percent of residents with improving bowel continence Improving bowel continence (previous) H3. Bowel continence = Continent, Control, did not occur H3. Bowel continence, not answered (previous) H3. Bowel continence, not answered AND H3. Bowel continence = some level of incontinence H4. Ostomy, not answered, or 1. Yes QI15: Percent of residents with improving bladder continence Improving bladder continence (previous) H1. Bladder continence = Continent, Control, did not occur H1. Bladder continence, not answered (previous) H1. Bladder continence, not answered AND H1. Bladder continence = some level of incontinence 16 of 18

QI17: Percent of residents whose cognitive ability has improved CPS score has improved (previous) CPS, not calculated AND CPS > 0 CPS, not calculated (previous) CPS = 0. Intact QI19: Percent of residents whose ability to communicate has improved Sum of D1. Making self understood, and D2. Ability to understand others, has improved D1. Making self understood, not answered D2. Ability to understand others, not answered (previous) (D1. Making self understood, not answered D2. Ability to understand others, not answered) AND (D1 + D2 > 0) (previous) D1. Making self understood = 0. Understood AND D2. Ability to understand others = 0. Understands 17 of 18

QI25: Percent of residents who have improved in their ability to locomote Locomotion has improved (previous) G1f. ADL self performance Locomotion = 0. Independent, or 1. Independent, setup help only G1f. ADL self performance Locomotion, not answered (previous) G1f. ADL self performance - Locomotion, not answered AND G1f. ADL self performance Locomotion > 1 (not independent) QI36: Percent of residents who have improved behavioural symptoms Sum of behavioural measures have improved (wandering, verbal abuse, physical abuse, socially inappropriate, sexual behaviour inappropriate Any behavioural measure is not answered 18 of 18