U.S. Department of Transportation. National Infrastructure Investments Grant Program. TIGER Discretionary GRANT APPLICATION

Similar documents
2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

SUNIGA/LEMAY MULTI-MODAL AND FREIGHT CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Cheyenne desires to participate in the Business Ready Community, Community Readiness Grants Program; and

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES

Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

2018 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

HEMPSTEAD LIVABLE CENTERS STUDY VALUES WORKSHOP

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

Economic Development and Employment Element

UNFUNDED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS OVERVIEW

Tower 55 Rail Reliever Study

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call

Transit Operations Funding Sources

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7.

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

Project Information. Application ID 2016-D06-03 Date Submitted 6/30/2016. Marion Intermodal / MAR ODOT District District 6 County Marion

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Funding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

Youngstown Infrastructure Enhancement Plan. March 1, 2016

Strategic Transportation Infrastructure Program

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

VI. UNIVERSITY PURCHASING AND PAYROLL

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Innovation Village, Cal Poly Pomona Economic Benefits Analysis City of Pomona

CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA

Organization Clark County Department of Public Works (DUNS No / CCR 3VNR8) 500 South Grand Central Parkway Las Vegas Nevada,

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

DOT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY

The Loop Media Hub. Gigabit Economic Development Impact Statement. Prepared for: The Loop Media Hub Feasability Study. June 27, 2012.

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

Comprehensive Planning Grant. Comprehensive Plan Checklist

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

HR&A Advisors. TOD Financing: The Reality of Today. Eric Rothman President HR&A Advisors, Inc. OCTOBER 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Federal, State, Local Funding and Assistance Programs. Nicole Fox, Iowa DOT Office of Local Systems

CITY OF ANN ARBOR ECONOMIC COLLABORATIVE TASK FORCE REPORT

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

2016 DOT Discretionary Grants

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

US 50/SOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT

Texas Department of Transportation

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D11-02 Date Submitted 6/30/2015. County, Route, Section. BEL-CR /Commons Mall Crossing

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2014 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

Request for Proposals

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

August 2007 Thomas Bohuslav Texas Department of Transportation

City of Dunwoody Policies. Article CITY OF DUNWOODY. Complete Streets Policy. Article. Version

CHAPTER House Bill No. 5013

State of Florida Department of Transportation. DISTRICT SIX Attachment A Scope of Services 1/19/2018

Memorandum June 1, 2017

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

The CAMPO FY

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

7/23/2013. Downtown Greenville s Success. Downtown Greenville s Success

A Lee County Economic Impact Study. Construction of the New Spring Training Baseball Stadium for Use by the Boston Red Sox

TIGER DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM Project Application

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

Washington State Department of Transportation

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Village of Hinckley: Local, State and Federal Tax Incentive Programs

In developing the program, as directed by the Board (Attachment A), staff used the following framework:

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING

City of Dallas Office of Economic Development Public/Private Partnership Program. February 21, 2012

Transcription:

U.S. Department of Transportation National Infrastructure Investments Grant Program TIGER Discretionary GRANT APPLICATION Project Name: Project Type: Loop 82 (Aquarena Springs Dr) UPRR Overpass Project Multimodal Transportation Project Project Cost: $38,003,502 Funds Requested: $ 16,743,502 (44.058%) Contact: James Massoro City of San Marcos Engineering & Capital Improvements Department 630 E. Hopkins San Marcos, Texas 78666 (512) 393-8130 jmassaro@sanmarcostx.gov DUNS #: 0694628690000 EIN / TIN: 74-6002238 Application ID: Website: http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project i Table of Contents Table of Contents... i List of Figures, List of Tables... ii I. Project Description... 1 A. Introduction...1 B. Project Components...4 C. Geospatial Data...5 II. Project Parties... 7 III. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds...7 IV. Selection Criteria...8 A. Long-Term Outcomes...8 i. State of Good Repair...8 ii. Economic Competitiveness...10 iii. Livability...10 iv. Sustainability...10 v. Safety...11 B. Job Creation & Near Term Economic Activity...11 C. Innovation...13 D. Partnership...13 E. Results of Benefit Cost Analysis...13 V. Project Readiness and NEPA...15 A. Project Schedule...15 B. Environmental Approvals...15 VI. Federal Wage Rate Certification...15 VII. Summary...15 Supporting Documentation can be found at: http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project ii List of Figures 1. Project Location... 3 2. Aerial View of Crossing... 5 3. Loop 82 UP Austin Subdivision ML-1 Crossing... 6 List of Tables 1. Project Geospatial Data... 6 2. Sources of Funds... 7 3. Uses of Funds... 8 4. Direct, Indirect, & Induced Impacts During Development... 11 5. Job Year Estimates with IMPLAN & CEA Methodology... 12 6. Short Term Economic Impacts from Project Development... 12 7. Short Term Impacts in Key Industries... 13 8. Discounted Project Benefit/Cost Summary... 14 9. Benefit Cost Calculations... 14

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 1 I. Project Description A. Introduction The Loop 82 (Aquarena Springs Drive) Union Pacific Railroad Overpass Project is a multimodal project that will have a significant impact on the region through rail, vehicular, pedestrian, safety, and mobility improvements. The project consists of the design and construction of a grade separated crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad s (UP) Austin Subdivision Main Line 1 (ML-1) and Loop 82 (also known as Aquarena Springs Drive) at their intersection in San Marcos, Texas. The project includes the design and reconstruction of a four-lane, undivided roadway with a grade separation within the project limits; including access roads, City street improvements, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The project runs directly through an important and highly utilized portion of Texas State University s campus. With Texas State s student population nearly 35,000, the City of San Marcos daytime population more than doubles to nearly 80,000. The project will dramatically improve safety for an intersection rated in the top five for congestion in Hays County and will enable improved and safe access for students, faculty, and visitors to the University, The project will provide significant benefits to the City of San Marcos, the region, and state through the integration and better use of multimodal connections on the facility and eliminate the existing at-grade highway-rail intersection with associated vehicular-rail conflicts. Reducing vehicular-rail conflicts will also reduce vehicular idling time at the existing crossing, thereby providing environmental benefits in the form of lower vehicular emissions. Safety will be improved by the reduction in vehicular-rail conflict exposure and through improved response times for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), as well as law enforcement officials. The UP effectively bisects the City of San Marcos, separating a large portion of the population from EMS and law enforcement services when trains occupy the main line. This occurs an average of 25 times daily when trains operate over this at-grade crossing. This roadway-rail configuration has historically resulted in significant delays in EMS and law enforcement response times which continue to this day. Grade separating these facilities will eliminate this problem with the resulting improvement in safety and quality of life for the citizens. San Marcos is located between two major cities, Austin and San Antonio. It s geographic location places it along a major Interstate and freight rail corridor that is one of the busiest NAFTA trade routes in the nation. San Marcos is also home to the State s 5 th largest university which has increased the City s profile and importance in the region. In addition, the US Department of Commerce has invested millions in developing the Science, Technology and Advanced Research (STAR) Park in partnership with the City and University which will draw corporate research in areas of alternative energy and further establish San Marcos as a center of high-tech employment.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 2 The benefits from completing the project exceed $38.1 million over 20 years, with a benefit cost ratio of 1.25 to 1. 1 US DOT TIGER grant funding would enable completion of this project. The project area is shown in Figure 1. 1 See the benefit cost analysis at http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm for details on how the project provides these benefits.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 3.Figure 1: Project Location

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 4 B. Project Components The project is wholly within the City of San Marcos in Hays County, Texas, and is designed to grade separate the intersection of Loop 82 and UP s Austin Subdivision Mainline 1 and improve local roadways. The project includes: acquisition of right-of-way, relocation of utilities (as necessary), reconstruction of a deteriorated section of Loop 82 (Aquarena Springs Drive), construction of a grade separation (bridge) on Loop 82 (Aquarena Springs Drive) over UP s Austin Subdivision ML-1, construction of access roads including turn-arounds at each end of the grade separation, construction of City street connections, realigning Post Road with improvements to another existing at-grade crossing, and improved pedestrian and bicycle access facilities to Texas State University. The City of San Marcos is literally divided in two by UP s main lines. The Austin Subdivision ML-1 extends through the City in a north-south direction parallel to Interstate Highway 35 (IH-35). The Austin Subdivision ML-2 enters the City from the south, parallel to ML-1 and IH-35, then turns and extends east toward Lockhart, Texas. This divergence is located just south of the proposed improvements to Loop 82. Downtown San Marcos, Texas State University, and other regionally significant facilities are located west of UP s Austin Subdivision ML 1. The existing Loop 82 Corridor provides a major gateway to the historic San Marcos square and downtown area, as well as the Hays County Courthouse and other county and City offices. San Marcos square is considered the entertainment and commercial center of San Marcos and Hays County. Most emergency services are located east of the Austin Subdivision ML-1 and cannot access the City center or west side of town when trains block the Loop 82 grade crossing. Loop 82 is currently a 60 wide, four lane, undivided, asphalt roadway with a 35 mph speed limit. UP s Austin Subdivision ML-1 is a single track rail line with a 30 mph maximum train speed. The Loop 82 and UP Austin Sub ML-1 crossing has an ADT of 33,000 and a train count of 25 trains per day. This high volume of vehicular and train traffic, coupled with the low train speeds, causes numerous vehicular-rail conflicts on a daily basis. These conflicts have a negative impact to mobility, air quality, safety, livability, and quality of life. An aerial view of the Loop 82 grade crossing is shown in Figure 2.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 5 Loop 82 X-ing.Figure 2: Aerial View of Crossing Completion of the proposed improvements will increase mobility in the area by providing a safe, grade-separated crossing of the UP in the center of San Marcos. Emergency response time will be improved by providing access for those services from the east to west across the grade separated facility. Pedestrian and bicycle mobility will also be enhanced by the planned improvements. C. Geospatial Data The proposed project begins on Loop 82 approximately (0.30 miles west of IH-35) at the intersection of Thorpe Lane (with Loop 82) and extends to the west over the UP Austin Subdivision ML-1 to the intersection of Charles Austin Drive (and Loop 82). The total length of the project is approximately 1.15 miles. The geospatial data for the beginning and end of the project is shown in Table 1.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 6 Location Latitude Longitude Description of Location Project Begins Grade Separation 29.89271-97.91812 29.89217-97.92623 Loop 82 Roadway Improvements Begin (from Thorpe Lane to the west) Intersection of Loop 82 and UP Austin Sub ML-1; US DOT # 447677 C Project Ends 29.88977-97.93164 Loop 82 Roadway Improvements End (at Charles Austin Blvd.) Table 1: Project Geospatial Data The Loop 82 and UP Austin Subdivision ML-1 crossing is shown in Figure 3, looking north along the tracks toward the crossing. Figure 3: Loop 82 UP Austin Subdivision ML-1 Crossing

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 7 II. Project Parties The project parties are the City of San Marcos, the Union Pacific Railroad, and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). The City of San Marcos and TxDOT are coapplicants for funding. Texas State University supports the project s goals of improving access and mobility to their campus, which is located immediately adjacent to the project. TSU has ownership of portions of the right-of-way that will be used for the project and is working with the City to affect a transfer of that property. The project also has broad support throughout the community. TxDOT will be responsible for the project from design through final construction. TxDOT has vast experience managing federal and state infrastructure projects as well as rail rehabilitation/construction projects and is the appropriate party to manage this project on behalf of the City of San Marcos. TxDOT has an effective asset management approach that optimizes the long-term cost structure and viability of the project, which includes: extensive experience in planning and designing roadways and bridge structures, (including grade separations), and maintaining the largest state roadway system in the U.S., decades of experience in administering federal highway and federal project funds, and direct supervision of contractors during construction activities. III. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds The City of San Marcos is partnering with TxDOT and the UP to develop the project. A combination of local, state, private, and federal funds is committed to the project, totaling $21,260,000 (55.942%) of the project total. A TIGER grant award of $16,743,502 (44.058%) is needed to complete the project. The sources of funds and participation for the project are shown in Table 2. These amounts are escalated to 2013 dollars, the planned project construction date. Funding Source Participation Total City of San Marcos 7.921 $ 3,010,000 Union Pacific RR 2.322 882,500 TxDOT Category 6 Funds 6.966 2,647,500 Federal Appropriation to City of San Marcos 1.579 600,000 Federal Category 6 Funds 37.154 14,120,000 TIGER Discretionary 44.058 16,743,502 TOTAL 100% $38,003,502 Table 2: Source of Funds

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 8 The uses of funds are shown in Table 3. The detailed project budget is included as Attachment A to this application. Item Total Engineering $2,600,000 Project Management, Inspection $1,845,817.28 Right of Way $5,078,000.00 Road Construction $3,197,367.03 Bridge Construction $17,053,896.65 Drainage $1,060,080.00 Traffic Controls $1,008,441.65 Environmental Controls $1,058,382.57 Mobilization $2,230,198.74 Utilities $631,057.00 Subtotal $35,763,240.92 2013 Escalation $ 2,240,261.08 Total $ $38,003,502 Table 3: Uses of Project Funds 2 IV. Selection Criteria A. Long-Term Outcomes i State of Good Repair The proposed project will improve the condition of an existing roadway transportation system and minimize life-cycle costs by widening the existing facility and bringing it into a state of good repair. The project includes improvements to both the main lanes of Loop 82 and the associated access roads and intersecting streets, which will enhance the serviceability of these assets.. The project will provide for a grade separation of UP s Austin Subdivision ML-1 that will eliminate through traffic at this grade crossing. The project will be appropriately capitalized up-front via a partnership between the City of San Marcos, the federal government, TxDOT, and UP. 2 See supporting documentation at http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm for the detailed project budget.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 9 The facility s current condition and performance and the projected condition and performance can be established by the following metrics: 1. Vehicular Delay Current: Vehicular through traffic is delayed daily for varying periods when trains block the existing crossing of Loop 82 and UP Austin Subdivision ML-1. This occurs at least 25 times daily. The project will also reroute approximately 60% of traffic from the Post Road grade crossing on the roadway extension, thereby reducing delays for commuters on that crossing also. Projected: The project will grade separate Loop 82 and ML-1 which will eliminate delays to through traffic. 2. Emergency Response Time Current: Most emergency response services in San Marcos are located east of the UP Subdivision ML-1, while the city offices, county offices, major businesses, and population centers are located west of ML-1. The at-grade crossing of Loop 82 and ML-1 causes poor response times by emergency responders when the crossing is blocked by trains. This presents a significant public safety and public health issue. Projected: Emergency response times will be greatly improved after Loop 82 and ML-1 are grade separated. 3. Community Enhancements Current: The UP Austin Subdivision ML-1 bisects the City of San Marcos and effectively creates a barrier between the City and County Offices, Central Business District, Texas State University, and the population centers located west of town. It also creates a barrier between these locations and the IH-35, the main north-south highway through Central Texas. Projected: The grade separation of Loop 82 and UP ML-1 is a component of the revitalization of downtown San Marcos. It will eliminate the barrier between the city center and the east side of town. The project includes improvements to city streets and frontage roads, as well as bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The project will also reduce emissions from idling vehicles. This scope of work will provide multiple enhancements to community cohesion and livability in the San Marcos region.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 10 ii. Economic Competitiveness The project will support the long-term efficiency, reliability, and cost-competitiveness of businesses in San Marcos by providing mobility and access improvements to the area. The improvements are a component of the San Marcos Downtown Master Plan Revitalization Project. The Loop 82 UP grade separation is envisioned as a Gateway Project intended to support the revitalization, redevelopment, and growth of downtown San Marcos. The construction of bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and a shared-use path would encourage the development of mixed use development patterns. This would result in a lower-cost transportation alternative and decreased congestion for the local businesses and Texas State University facilities. iii. Livability The project will benefit the livability of the region and have a positive impact on community life by improving vehicular mobility and safety at the intersection of Loop 82 and UP s Austin Subdivision ML-1. Mobility will be greatly increased by grade separating the roadway from the rail line, which will reduce vehicular idling and delay time at the crossing. The construction of bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and a shared-use path will enhance the livability of the area. Texas State University (TSU) serves nearly 35,000 students on the 457 acre campus, which is accessed via Loop 82. Texas State s Bobcat Stadium is also located adjacent to the project and is in the process of planning an expansion from 15,000 to 24,500 seats. The Loop 82 corridor also provides access to the historic San Marcos square as well as the downtown area, which includes the Hays County Courthouse. This is the entertainment and commercial center of San Marcos. The project will enhance points of modal connectivity by separating through traffic on Loop 82 from local traffic on the access roads and intersecting streets. This would improve access and safety at a transit bus stop that is located just west of Charles Austin Drive. The mobility of the City transit buses and Texas State s shuttle buses will be increased by reducing traffic congestion and delays. iv. Sustainability The grade separation of Loop 82 and UP s Austin Subdivision ML-1 will improve energy efficiency by reducing vehicular idling time at the existing crossings. This will provide multiple benefits for many generations from air quality improvements, sustainability, economic growth, and reductions in the use of greenhouse gas hydrocarbons.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 11 There are substantial transporation-related costs related to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. If Loop 82 is not grade separated, those costs and greenhouse gas emissions would increase dramatically over time as VMT and congestion increases, which would cause adverse effects to the environment. v. Safety The project will provide safety improvements for the traveling public, as well as the operating railroad, by eliminating vehicular-train conflicts for through traffic on Loop 82. Safety will also be enhanced by improved response times for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), as well as law enforcement officials. The UP effectively bisects the City of San Marcos, separating a large portion of the population from EMS and law enforcement services when trains occupy the main line. This roadway-rail configuration has historically resulted in significant delays in EMS and law enforcement response times which continue to this day. Grade separating these facilities will eliminate this problem with the resulting improvement in safety and quality of life for the citizens. B. Job Creation & Near Term Economic Activity 3 The Minnesota IMPLAN Group s input-output model has been used to estimate the direct, indirect and induced effects of the Loop 82 project in terms of employment, value added and labor income. Employment represents full-time and part-time jobs created for a full year. Value added represents total business sales (output) minus the cost of purchasing intermediate products and is roughly equivalent to gross regional/domestic product. Labor income consists of employee compensation (wage and salary payments as well as health and life insurance, retirement payments and any other non-cash compensation) and proprietary income (payments received by self-employed individuals as income). The project is expected to generate 592 job-years during the development phase. It is also expected to create $45.4 million in value added, including $30.8 million in labor income. A breakdown of short-term impacts by type of effect (direct, indirect and induced) is provided in Table below. Note that the purchasing cost of the Right of Way (ROW) is not included in the total spending for the Economic Impact Analysis. ROW is regarded as a transfer from one entity to another. Table 4: Direct, Indirect and Induced Impacts during Project Development Phase Spending Direct Indirect Induced Total (Millions of 2011 Dollars) Employment* 239.3 128.9 224.0 592.2 Labor Income** $30.69 $12.34 $7.94 $10.53 $30.81 Value Added** $14.03 $12.70 $18.70 $45.42 3 See: Benefit-Cost and Economic Impact Analysis at http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 12 Note: * Employment impacts from IMPLAN should not be interpreted as full-time equivalent (FTE) as they reflect the mix of full and part time jobs that is typical for each sector. On average, the ratio of FTE to full- and part-time jobs is estimated at 90 percent. **Millions of Dollars of 2011. Another method to estimate job-years from additional spending uses the Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) methodology 4. This assumes that for every $92,000 of government spending, one job-year is created. The following table shows the difference in job-year estimates using the IMPLAN and CEA methodologies. Note that the employment impacts are lower when using CEA s approach. Table 5: Job Year Estimates with IMPLAN and CEA Methodology Spending (Millions of 2010 Dollars) Direct Indirect Induced Total IMPLAN * 239.3 128.9 224.0 592.2 CEA $30.69 213.5 120.1 333.5 Note: * Employment impacts from IMPLAN should not be interpreted as full-time equivalent (FTE) as they reflect the mix of full and part time jobs that is typical for each sector. A breakdown of short-term economic impacts (IMPLAN estimates) in terms of employment (jobhours), labor income and value added is provided by quarter in Table below. Table 6: Short-Term Economic Impacts Resulting from Project Development Period Spending (Millions of 2010 Dollars)* Total Job-Hours** Direct Job-Hours** Total Labor Income (Millions of 2010 Dollars) Total Value Added (Millions of 2010 Dollars) Year 2011 - Q3 $0.33 2,813 1,137 $0.33 $0.48 Year 2011 - Q4 $0.33 2,813 1,137 $0.33 $0.48 Year 2012 - Q1 $0.33 2,813 1,137 $0.33 $0.48 Year 2012 - Q2 $0.33 2,813 1,137 $0.33 $0.48 Year 2012 - Q3 $0.33 2,813 1,137 $0.33 $0.48 Year 2012 - Q4 $0.33 2,813 1,137 $0.33 $0.48 Year 2013 - Q1 $0.48 4,179 1,689 $0.48 $0.71 Year 2013 - Q2 $0.48 4,179 1,689 $0.48 $0.71 Year 2013 - Q3 $4.08 35,315 14,272 $4.10 $6.04 Year 2013 - Q4 $4.08 35,315 14,272 $4.10 $6.04 Year 2014 - Q1 $3.92 33,949 13,720 $3.94 $5.81 Year 2014 - Q2 $3.92 33,949 13,720 $3.94 $5.81 Year 2014 - Q3 $3.92 33,949 13,720 $3.94 $5.81 Year 2014 - Q4 $3.92 33,949 13,720 $3.94 $5.81 Year 2015 - Q1 $3.92 33,949 13,720 $3.94 $5.81 Total $30.69 265,613 107,346 $30.81 $45.42 4 Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic Advisers, Estimates of Job Creation from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Washington, D.C., May 11, 2009.

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 13 Notes: * includes engineering ($4.45 million) and construction ($26.34 million); ** assuming average weekly hours of 34.5 (Bureau of Labor Statistics estimate). Table 7 below presents the short-term increase in employment and labor income resulting from the project development in key industries employing low-income people. 353 cumulative job-years are expected to be created in those industries by the end of 2015, bringing in an additional $16.6 million in labor income. Table 7: Short-Term Impacts in Key Industries Employing Low-Income People Sectors Employment (Job-Years) Labor Income (Millions of 2010 Dollars) Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 0.0 $0.19 Construction 242.4 $12.50 Retail trade 36.8 $1.40 Truck transportation 6.1 $0.33 Administrative and support and waste management 21.5 $0.87 and remediation services Nursing and residential care facilities, home health 15.3 $0.51 care services Accommodation and food services 27.6 $0.64 Personal and laundry services 3.1 $0.20 Total 352.9 $16.64 C. Innovation There are no definitive technological benefits from this project as described in the NOFA. D. Partnership This is a multi-party, public-private partnership for the improvement of vehicular and rail mobility and safety in the City of San Marcos. The project parties are the City of San Marcos, TxDOT, and the Union Pacific Railroad. The City of San Marcos and TxDOT are co-applicants for the TIGER grant funding. TxDOT, the City of San Marcos, and UP are all contributing funds to the project. Texas State University supports the project s goals of improving access and mobility to their campus, which is located immediately adjacent to the project, and the community. The project also has the support of numerous public officials, businesses, academic institutions, and the citizens of San Marcos and Hays County. E. Results of Benefit-Cost Analysis The project provides significant benefits for the region as well as the state and nation. The various categories of benefits have been briefly discussed in the previous sections of this

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 14 application. A Benefit-Cost Analysis study of the project s impacts over a 20 year period was completed and is available for review at http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm. The results of the Benefit-Cost Analysis are summarized in Tables 8 and 9 below. Project Evaluation Metric 7% Discount Rate 3% Discount Rate Total Discounted Benefits $38.24 $53.01 Total Discounted Costs $30.76 $33.50 Net Present Value $7.47 $19.50 Benefit / Cost Ratio 1.24 1.58 Internal Rate of Return (%) 9.7% Payback Period (years) 9.4 Table 8: Discounted Project Benefit/Cost Summary Long-Term Outcomes Benefit Categories 7% Discount Rate 3% Discount Rate Economic Competitiveness Livability Environmental Sustainability Safety Travel Time Savings due to Elimination of Wait Time at Loop 82 Grade Crossing Reduced Vehicle Operating Costs due to Elimination of Wait Times at Loop 82 Grade Crossing Travel Time Savings due to Elimination of Wait Time for Reduced Traffic at Post Rd Crossing Reduced Vehicle Operating Costs due to Elimination of Wait Times for Reduced Traffic at Post Rd Crossing Health Improvement due to Improved Bicycle Facilities Mobility Benefit due to Improved Bicycle Facilities Recreation Benefit due to Improved Bicycle Facilities Reduced Auto Use Benefits due to Improved Bicycle Facilities Environmental Savings due to Reduced Vehicle Waiting Times at Loop 82 Grade Crossing Environmental Savings due to Reduced Vehicle Waiting Times at Post Rd Crossing Reduced Accident Costs due to Elimination of Loop 82 Grade Crossing $11.93 $20.63 $0.76 $1.29 $2.50 $4.32 $0.16 $0.27 $0.56 $0.92 $1.80 $2.93 $8.34 $13.61 $0.01 $0.02 $0.32 $0.44 $0.07 $0.09 $11.78 $8.48 Total Benefit Estimates $38.24 $53.01 Table 9: Benefit Cost Calculations

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 15 The project has a Return-On-Investment (ROI) of 9.7% and a benefit cost ratio of 1.24 to 1 when considering the benefits and costs detailed in the analysis. V. Project Readiness and NEPA A. Project Schedule The project schedule is dependent upon the timing of a grant award and execution of the grant agreement. The total duration of the project is estimated at 1,022 days. Assuming that all agreements were finalized in the first quarter of 2012, the project would start on April 2012 and be completed in March 2015. A detailed schedule of activities is available at http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm. The project is in the State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP). Any delays in the grant approval and appropriation process would result in similar delays in project implementation. B. Environmental Approvals The environmental process is estimated to be completed in 406 days from the Notice to Proceed.. VI. Federal Wage Rate Certification TxDOT follows federal wage rate requirements and the federal wage rate certification is provided as an attachment to the application. VII. Summary The grade separation of Loop 82 and UP s Austin Subdivision ML-1 is a significant component of the revitalization of San Marcos, Texas. The project is needed to improve access to various city and county offices, as well as Texas State University and area businesses. The project is also critical to improving the response time of Emergency Medical Services, law enforcement, and other essential services. The estimated impacts from the project show a savings of over $90.48 million over a 20 year period 5. The project will have positive direct and indirect impacts on the economy, employment levels, tax revenues, and highway costs. It is estimated that the project will create 194 construction jobs and 410 other jobs. The economic impact from the wages 5 See: Benefit-Cost and Economic Impact Analysis at http://www.txdot.gov/business/rail/tiger3.htm

Loop 82 UP Overpass Project 16 associated with job creation totals a minimum of $13,892,966. The project will also improve the long-term efficiency and reliability of these transportation resources and contribute to the economic competitiveness of the region and state.