Hospital P4P: The CMS/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project

Similar documents
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) / PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

Linking Supply Chain, Patient Safety and Clinical Outcomes

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

CMS Quality Initiatives: Past, Present, and Future

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Healthcare Reform Hospital Perspective

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Pay-for-Performance. GNYHA Engineering Quality Improvement

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Aligning Hospital and Physician P4P The Q-HIP SM /QP-3 SM Model. Rome H. Walker MD February 28, 2008

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

CMS in the 21 st Century

Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL and TRAUMA CENTER

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

Financial Policy & Financial Reporting. Jay Andrews VP of Financial Policy

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Enhanced Clinical Workflow Adherence Through Real-Time Alerts and Escalations for P4P

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Performance Scorecard 2013

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

1.01 Government Programs: CMS and Pay for Performance: Current Issues. CMS Regional Administrator March 2009

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE/HOSPITAL VALUE TOOL 2011/2012 METHODOLOGY

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Outline. Background. Public Reporting & Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization April 2010

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

WA Flex Program Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Program

Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)

Performance Scorecard 2009

Value Based Purchasing

Quality Matters. Quality & Performance Improvement

Medicare Payment Strategy

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

AHRQ Quality Indicators. Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission October 21, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

NOTE: New Hampshire rules, to

Core Metrics for Better Care, Lower Costs, and Better Health

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization June 2010

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

P4P Programs 9/13/2013. Medicare P4P Programs. Medicaid P4P Programs

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

Marin General Hospital. Performance Metrics and Core Services Report. 1st Quarter 2016

Cigna Centers of Excellence Hospital Value Tool 2015 Methodology

OVERVIEW OF THE FY 2018 IPPS FINAL RULE. Published in the Federal Register August 14 th Rule to take effect October 1 st

National Priorities for Improvement:

The Potential Impact of Pay-for-Performance on the Financial Health of Critical Access Hospitals

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives

Mastering the Mandatory Elements of the Affordable Care Act. Melinda Hancock Walter Coleman

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

How the compliance department can support quality of care initiatives

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Quality Provisions in the EPM Final Rule. Matt Baker Scott Wetzel

Value of the CDI Program Cindy Dennis, MHS, RHIT

Value of the CDI Program Cindy Dennis, MHS, RHIT

An Investigation into CMS's Value-Based Purchasing Proposal

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

Quality Measurement, Population Health and Payment Reform

Market Mover? The Emerging Role of CMS in P4P. Linda Magno Director, Medicare Demonstrations Group August 24, 2004

New Mexico Hospital Association

Person-Centered Care and Population Health

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

Driving Quality Improvement: Development and Implementation of a Small/Rural Hospital P4P Program

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Benchmark Data Sources

Transcription:

Hospital P4P: The CMS/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project March 10, 2009 Mary B. Bergerson Regional Quality Director St. Helena Hospital 1

Nationwide knowledge to improve local healthcare 2,000 Hospitals gain the advantages of national scale by uniting through the Premier healthcare alliance 2

Value-based Purchasing timeline Institute of Medicine (IOM) Report To Err is Human Medicare Modernization Act ties hospital market basket updates to quality reporting Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demo launched Hospital Compare launched MedPAC Report supports use of VBP Grassley-Baucus (S.1356) valuebased purchasing legislation introduced Deficit Reduction Act mandates a Report to Congress on the Plan to Implement a Medicare Hospital VBP Program IOM Report on Aligning Hospital incentives CMS Report to Congress on VBP Senate Finance Committee Roundtable on VBP 1990 s 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 3

CMS/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration CMS and Premier partnership project First national Pay-for-Performance (P4P) demonstration Tests the hypothesis that financial incentives and public recognition can increase quality of care A three-year effort launched October, 2003 Approximately 260 hospitals in 38 states 4

Rewarding delivery of widely accepted evidence-based clinical indicators Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) 1. Aspirin at arrival 2. Aspirin prescribed at discharge 3. ACEI/ARB for LVSD 4. Smoking cessation advice/counseling 5. Beta blocker prescribed at discharge 6. Beta blocker at arrival 7. Thrombolytic received within 30 minutes of hospital arrival 8. PCI received within 90 minutes of hospital arrival 9. Inpatient mortality rate Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) 1. Aspirin prescribed at discharge 2. CABG using internal mammary artery (Test) 3. Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour prior to surgical incision 4. Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical patients 5. Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued within 24/48 hours after surgery end time 6. Inpatient mortality rate 7. Post operative hemorrhage or hematoma 8. Post operative physiologic and metabolic derangement Heart failure (HF) 1. Left Ventricular Systolic (LVS) assessment 2. Detailed discharge instructions 3. ACEI or ARB for LVSD 4. Smoking cessation advice/counseling Pneumonia (PN) 1. Percentage of patients who received an oxygenation assessment within 24 hours prior to or after hospital arrival 2. Initial antibiotic selection for Community Acquired Pneumonia 3. Blood culture collected prior to first antibiotic administration 4. Influenza screening/vaccination 5. Pneumococcal screening/vaccination 6. Antibiotic timing, percentage of pneumonia patients who received first dose of antibiotics within four hours after hospital arrival 7. Smoking cessation advice/counseling Hip and knee replacement 1. Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour prior to surgical incision 2. Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical patients 3. Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued within 24 hours after surgery end time 4. Post operative hemorrhage or hematoma 5. Post operative physiologic and metabolic derangement 6. Readmission within 30 days to any acute care facility Surgical Italics = outcomes measure 5

6 Dramatic and Sustained Improvement Avg. improvement across all 5 clinical areas for median CQS (19 quarters) 18.66% HQID Composite Quality Score Clinical Area Improvement (percentage points) AMI 8.9% CABG 14.1% Pneumonia 25.9% Heart Failure 31.4% Hip & Knee 13.0% 100% CMS HQID Composite Quality Score CMS/Premier HQID Project Participants Composite Quality Score: Trend of Quarterly Median (5th Decile) by Clinical Focus Area October 1, 2003 - June 30, 2008 (Years 1, 2, & 3 Final Data; Years 4 and 5 Preliminary Data) 64.0% 68.1% 70.0% 73.1% 73.1% 76.1% 78.2% 85.1% 85.9% 89.6% 90.0% 91.5% 92.5% 93.5% 93.4% 95.1% 95.77% 96.0% 96.1% 96.8% 96.8% 97% 97.0% 97.6% 97.5% 98.3% 98.27% 98.54% 89.4% 90.6% 93.7% 94.9% 96.2% 97.01% 96.8% 98.3% 98.4% 98.4% 98% 97.7% 97.8% 98.4% 98.5% 99.01% 99.19% 78.1% 80.0% 82.5% 82.7% 84.8% 86.30% 88.5% 89.3% 90.1% 91.4% 92% 92.4% 93.5% 93.4% 94.2% 94.85% 95.90% 81.6% 83.0% 84.38% 86.7% 88.8% 90.0% 89.9% 90% 91.6% 93.2% 93.4% 94.2% 94.90% 95.38% 85.1% 86.7% 88.7% 90.9% 91.6% 93.4% 95.2% 95.92% 96.6% 97.1% 97.8% 97.9% 98% 97.9% 98.0% 98.1% 97.4% 97.46% 98.16% 95% 92.3% 94.11% 95.27% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% AMI CABG Pneumonia Heart Failure Hip and Knee SCIP Clinical Focus Area 4Q03 1Q04 2Q04 3Q04 4Q04 1Q05 2Q05 3Q05 4Q05 1Q06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08

7 More Patients are Receiving Every quality measure Avg. improvement from 4Q03 to 2Q08 in all clinical areas (19 quarters) 55.05% Clinical Area Improvement (percentage points) AMI 23.7% CABG 66.5% Pneumonia 65.1% Heart Failure 54.9% Hip & Knee 65.1% Evidence-based Care Improvements CMS/Premier HQID Project Participants Appropriate Care Score: Trend of Quarterly Median (5th Decile) by Clinical Focus Area October 1, 2003 - June 30, 2008 (Year 1, 2, and 3 Final Data; Year 4 and 5 Preliminary) Appropriate Care Score 70.7% 72.7% 75.7% 80.0% 80.9% 80.6% 85.0% 87.0% 87.8% 88.2% 89.6% 88.6% 90.0% 90.0% 92.1% 92.8% 93.5% 93.8% 94.4% 30.0% 34.1% 45.8% 48.7% 68.5% 77.3% 82.9% 84.2% 86.6% 91.9% 93.3% 91.7% 91.7% 93.3% 94.1% 95.5% 92.7% 96.0% 96.5% 22.3% 28.0% 34.7% 39.0% 43.8% 44.3% 50.7% 53.8% 60.9% 62.8% 67.6% 70.3% 82.6% 82.8% 87.0% 87.0% 77.1% 82.7% 87.4% 34.7% 43.6% 50.0% 53.8% 58.5% 62.6% 64.6% 68.0% 72.3% 75.8% 78.1% 78.3% 79.2% 82.5% 85.2% 86.0% 85.5% 87.9% 89.7% 27.8% 34.1% 41.2% 53.6% 63.6% 72.1% 78.6% 81.3% 85.7% 85.9% 89.5% 87.1% 90.0% 86.4% 86.2% 87.0% 86.9% 89.3% 92.9% 76.7% 84.0% 84.0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AMI CABG PN HF Hip and Knee SCIP Clinical Focus Area 4Q03 1Q04 2Q04 3Q04 4Q04 1Q05 2Q05 3Q05 4Q05 1Q06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08

Substantial Improvement by Lower Performers Percentage of Hospital Clinical Focus Groups in "Penalty Box" Preliminary HQID Year 4 Results Updated 2-4-09 3.0% 2.5% 2.4% Percentage 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Percentage of Hospital Clinical Focus Groups in "Penalty Box" HQID Final Data Years 1-3 Year 1 Base 20% Year 2 Q1 11% 8% Year 2 Q2 Year 2 Q3 5% 5% Year 2 Q4 3% Year 3 Q1 Year 3 Q2 2% 1% <1% Year 3 Q3 Year 3 Q4 Percentage 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 5.0% Percentage of Hospital Clinical Focus Groups in "Penalty Box" Preliminary HQID Year 5 Results Updated 2-4-09 4.4% 1.6% 1.1% Q4-06 Q1-07 Q2-07 Q3-07 Yr4 Prelim Quarter 1.4% 0.8% Quarter Percentage 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 3.3% 3.0% 0.0% Q4-07 Q1-08 Q2-08 Q3-08 Quarter 8

In Broader Comparison, HQID Hospitals Excel HQID participants avg. 6.8% higher than Non-Participants National Leaders in Quality Performance HQID hospitals have higher quality ratings than national hospitals overall Avg. improvement for HQID participants = 9.7% Avg. improvement for Nonparticipants = 7.4% New England Journal of Medicine publication by Lindenauer et al. (February 2007) found that hospitals engaged in P4P achieved quality scores 2.6 to 4.1 percentage points above other hospitals due solely to the impact of P4P incentives. A composite of 19 measures shared in common between HQID and Hospital Compare shows P4P hospitals performing above the nation as a whole 9

Established in 1878, St. Helena serves a five county region and 200,000 residents in largely rural northern CA 158 inpatient beds treating 75,000 inpatient & outpatient visits annually Medical staff of 125 with 920 total employees 63% revenue from Medicare and Medicaid 10

Continuous Improvement in Composite Quality Scores Continuous improvement from Year 1 to Year 5 Year to Date (YTD) HQID data for the Composite Quality Score (CQS), a combination of clinical quality measures and outcome measures. 100% St Helena Hospital Trend of Quarterly HQID Composite Quality Scores by Clinical Focus Area October 1, 2003 - June 30, 2008 (Year 1-3 Final Data; Year 4 & 5 Preliminary Data) = HQID Top 20% Threshold Value; = HQID Median 95% 90% Composite Quality Score 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% AMI Heart Failure Pneumonia CABG Hip/Knee 11

Consistent Top Performer Top Performer in Heart Failure for Years 1 and 2 Top Performer in AMI in Years 2 and 3 Tracking for Top Performer in Years 4 and 5 Top Performer in Hip/Knee Replacement for Year 3 Tracking for Top Performer in Year 4 Tracking Top Performer in CABG for Year 5 Significant improvement in Pneumonia 65% in Year 1 to 94% Year 4 Tracking for Top Improver Award in Years 4 and 5 Tracking to receive Attainment Award for all clinical areas in Year 4 and all except Hip/Knee Replacement for Year 5 12

More Patients are Reliably Receiving Evidencedbased Care The appropriate care score (ACS), also referred to as perfect process or all or nothing to designate when a patient receives all possible care measures within a clinical area, showed improvement across time. 100% St Helena Hospital Trend of Quarterly HQID Appropriate Care Scores by Clinical Focus Area October 1, 2003 - June 30, 2008 (Year 1-3 Final Data; Year 4 & 5 Preliminary Data) = HQID Top 20% Threshold Value; = HQID Median 90% 80% 70% Appropriate Care Score 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AMI Heart Failure Pneumonia CABG Hip/Knee 13

Performing Above the National Average A composite of 19 process measures shared between HQID and Hospital Compare shows St. Helena Hospital performing above the nation as a whole. St. Helena Hospital Compared to National Group Trend Hospital Compare Data 19 Process Measures Aggregated to Overall Composite Process Score National Average State Average St Helena Hospital 96% Composite Process Score (Mean Value, Percent) 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80% 78% 85.9% 83.0% 90.6% 86.7% 84.0% 91.7% 87.5% 85.1% 92.5% 88.3% 86.4% 93.0% 89.7% 88.1% 94.2% 90.3% 89.1% 94.7% 76% July 05-June 06 Oct 05-Sept 06* Jan 06-Dec 06 Apr 06-Mar 07 July 06-June 07 Oct 06-Sept 07 Comparison of HQID Participation and Non-Premier Status *Beginning w ith Oct 05-Sept 06 the influenza vaccination measure became unsuppressed and the number of process measures increased from 18 to 19 14

Improvement and Savings Avg. cost improvement across all clinical areas $1,063 Clinical Area Improvement AMI $1,599 CABG $1,579 Pneumonia $811 Heart Failure $1,181 Hip Replacement $744 Knee Replacement $463 Avg. improvement in mortality across four clinical areas 1.87% Clinical Area Improvement AMI 2.27% CABG 0.95% Pneumonia 2.39% Heart Failure 1.86% If all hospitals in the nation were to achieve this improvement, the estimated cost savings would be greater than $4.5 billion annually with estimated 70,000 lives saved per year 15

Findings: Mortality, Complications, Length of Stay and Costs all go down for Heart Attack (AMI) Median Cost per Case over 3 years (AMI) 15500 15000 14500 14000 13500 13000 12500 12000 Q4-03 Q1-04 Q2-04 Q3-04 Q4-04 Q1-05 Q2-05 Q3-05 Q4-05 Q1-06 Q2-06 Q3-06 16

Conclusions 1. Creates a performance improvement engine Public reporting Financial incentives 2. Aligns incentives within hospitals 3. Re-aligns payment incentives in Medicare From rewarding more procedures to rewarding quality procedures 4. Improved quality is associated with saving lives and reducing costs 17

Policy Recommendations 1. Create a positive incentive to improve performance. All unallocated funds must be used to reward top performers and improvers There must be an annual actuarial assessment to identify savings, which should be used to fund a bonus pool Phase in so that hospitals can realistically achieve the benchmarks 2. Align physician and hospital interests. Assure alignment between physician and hospital measures Hospitals should be able to share money from the bonus pool with their physicians 3. Set benchmarks based on real world evidence from the CMS/Premier HQID project. 4. VBP should be irrevocably tied to public reporting. The Hospital Compare Web site must be more user friendly Hospital Compare should include reporting of the hospital s performance in delivering all recommended quality measures for each clinical condition All new measures should be tested and publicly reported use in a VBP program 5. Government should direct attention and resources to lower performing hospitals QIOs should be directed to focus attention on non-performing hospitals 18