BRAZEAU COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF DRAYTON VALLEY INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW

Similar documents
Bowen Island Municipality

County of Alpena Website Design and Development RFP

2016 Park Assessment

Request for Proposals (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN SERVICES

Local Government Management Association of BC

Tourism Marketing Strategy

5102P - Functional Consultant for PeopleSoft Financial and Supply Chain Management Release 9.2 Upgrade 1. Introduction

INVITATION TO NEOGOTIATE ISSUED DATE ITN #

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Intensive Level Survey of Original Town Plat

RFP # Request for Proposal Grant Writing Services. Date: May 11, Proposals must be submitted by 3:00 PM: June 10, 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR POLICE OPERATIONS STUDY. Police Department CITY OF LA PALMA

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

Request for Proposals City of Oberlin, Ohio Branding and Cultural Wayfinding Signage Plan

Request for Proposal To Prepare a Zoning Ordinance Comprehensive Amendment

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CAPITAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE UPDATE AND REVIEW. Town of St. Albans, Franklin County, Vermont

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Transportation Systems Plan (TSP)

Request for Proposals

The SoIN Tourism staff will supply editorial content and direction, as well as photographs to illustrate the content.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Professional Auditing Services. Proposal Mailing Date December 30, 2013

Request for Proposals and Specifications for a Community Solar Project

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS G ELLUCIAN (Datatel) COLLEAGUE CONVERSION TO MS SQL AND RELATED UPGRADES PROJECT

Request for Proposals Marketing, Communications, and Website Management, Social Media

MARKET OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS FOR THE OCEAN TECHNOLOGY SECTOR IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

RFP #7529 Dane County Comprehensive Plan Mail Survey

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Design Services for New Fire Station

Russell County Commission. Russell County, Alabama. Request for Proposal Comprehensive Plan Pages Notice of Intent to Respond

Request for Proposal 1705A Wireless Network

Request for Proposal. Study on Economic Impact of Calgary s Post-Secondary Sector. Reference Number:

Georgia Lottery Corporation ("GLC") PROPOSAL. PROPOSAL SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION (Authorized representative must sign and return with proposal)

Request for Proposal # Housing Services Corporation. Web and Graphic Design Services. Housing Services Corporation

Request for Proposals and Qualifications for. Owner s Representative Services (RFP) August Farmington Public Schools. Farmington Town Hall

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TWENTY VALLEY TOURISM ASSOCIATION. TVTA Event Management Services

PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATES SOMERSET COUNTY AND THE CITY OF CRISFIELD, MARYLAND

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Digital Archiving Project

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Guidance Manual on Green Procurement

Request for Proposals. Housing Study Consulting Services. Proposals DUE: January 6, City of Grandview. Economic Development Department

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Request for Information and Qualifications RFIQ No Facility Asset Management Consulting Services

Request for Proposals (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS STRATEGIC INITIATIVES FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Ontario College of Trades

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY. Request for Proposals (RFP) IT Works Maintenance or Replacement for Mississippi State University

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. Request for Proposals (RFP) INNOVATIVE FINANCING STUDY FOR THE INTERSTATE 69 CORRIDOR

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE TOWN OF TOPSHAM S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PENSION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) # CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A DISTRICT SUSTAINABILITY PLAN

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Sage Seniors Association. Health Services for Seniors Mobile Health Service Providers

Request for Proposals (RFP) for Planning Consultant Services Africa Town Neighborhood Revitalization Plan. Bid#NRP2015-1

VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF GREENVILLE, SC REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO

Request for Proposals (RFP) for: Food Waste Curbside Collection Pilot Program. City of South Portland, ME

Amalgamation Study Consultant

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Lower Manhattan Development Corporation Avi Schick, Chairman David Emil, President. March 2, 2009

Morgan Hill Unified School District

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP# CAFTB

ALLEGHENY COUNTY RESIDENTIAL FINANCE AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Analysis of Housing Markets in Allegheny County

MATERIALS AND PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1900 YONGE STREET PAGE 1 OF 1 TORONTO, ONTARIO M4S 1Z2

TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE BLUE 52 TOWNHOMES HOA MANAGEMENT SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Issued August 1, 2017

PURPOSE Appendix A BACKGROUND

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) MARKETING AGENCY FOR LANE COUNTY FAIR

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR SECURITY CAMERA INSTALLATION: Stones River Baptist Church. 361 Sam Ridley Parkway East. Smyrna, Tennessee 37167

Destination Calgary video, b-roll and photo assets for Calgary Economic Development, Tourism Calgary and other promotional partners

Town of Derry, NH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL AUDITING SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOWNTOWN WAYFINDING CONSULTING AND DESIGN

Request for Proposal For Audit Services

Request for Proposal. Mobile Application for Customer Interface. October 6 th, 2017 Procurement Contact Holly Hussey

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SERVICES FOR. [Federal Media Network Training] Prepared by. IOM Somalia. [Somalia Stabilization Initiative - SSI]

BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES

MOBILE ASSET DATA COLLECTION. Pavement Condition Index Ground Penetrating Radar Deflection Testing. Contact Information:

LEGAL NOTICE Request for Proposal for Services

FIRST 5 LA GRAPHIC DESIGN VENDOR REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

CALGARY FOUNDATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR. Responsive Website Redesign calgaryfoundation.org. ISSUED: March 20, QUESTIONS BY: March 27, 2017

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY. Request for Proposals (RFP) Curriculum Management Software for Mississippi State University

Request for Proposal. Soul of the City Neighbour Grant Documentary Video. Reference Number:

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY Request for Proposals (RFP) Bike Share for Mississippi State University

SECTION 2 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS (IB)

Request for Proposal PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) THIS IS NOT AN ORDER

City of Jersey Village

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR. Document Management System for a Tribal Governmental Organization PROPOSAL NO. FY2012/041

EL DORADO HILLS COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR MONITORING SERVICES

CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE INVITATION TO BID

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. Design Professional Services

TOWN AUDITING SERVICES

TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Request for Proposal for: Financial Audit Services

FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR DISASTER RESPONSE, ENGINEERING, AND GRANT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Downtown Memphis Sign Code and Design Guidelines Update

Londonderry Finance Department

REQUEST FOR SERVICE QUALIFICATIONS (RSQ) FOR AUDIT & TAX SERVICES

Request for Proposals Solid Waste Management Available Technology Analysis

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BRAZEAU COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF DRAYTON VALLEY INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RFP: 17M-009 Closing time: June 30, 2017 at 16:00 Hrs (MST) Brazeau County Box 77 7401 Twp Rd 494 Drayton Valley, AB T7A 1R1 Phone: 780-542-2667 Fax: 780-542-7770 www.brazeau.ab.ca 1 P a g e

Request for Proposal Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley Intermunicipal Development Plan Review 1. Proposal Submission Interested consultants may submit a proposal for the services requested in the Terms of Reference attached. Proposals must be received by June 30, 2017 at 16:00 Hrs (MST) in a sealed envelope and addressed to: Martino Verhaeghe, Director of Planning & Development Brazeau County Box 77 7401 Twp Rd 494 Drayton Valley, AB T7A 1R1 RFP: 17M-009 At a minimum, each proposal shall contain the following: i) A consulting firm profile outlining expertise, history, philosophy and target market. ii) Staff to be assigned to the project and their relevant experience and qualifications. iii) Methodology to complete project phases, including price and time allocated for each task. iv) Schedule of fees for staff assigned to the project. v) Number of proposed meetings, including the purpose and structure of the meeting. vi) Minimum of three references for similar projects completed. vii) Three examples of similar projects completed. Proposals received after the submission deadline or not meeting the submission requirements will not be accepted. Interested consultants will submit one hardcopy and one Adobe PDF version of the proposal on CD or USB key. Proposals must be received at the front reception desk at the above specified address and at the predetermined time (as per the time-date stamp clock located at the Brazeau County Main Reception Desk) and date set forth or they will not be accepted for this specific RFP. Faxed or emailed proposals will not be accepted nor considered. Any proposals that are received via facsimile or email will be returned to the consultant via method received. Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley (hereafter referred to as the Client ) are not responsible for the timeliness of documents delivered nor will the Client accept any proposal delivered to a location other than the reception desk at the above specified address. 2. RFP Inquiries Refer all written proposal inquiries to Martino Verhaeghe, Director of Planning & Development Brazeau County by email only at MVerhaeghe@brazeau.ab.ca. No phone calls will be accepted. 2 P a g e

All written inquiries and the replies thereto will be provided as an Addendum posted to the Alberta Purchasing Connection (APC) website. It will be each consultant s responsibility to check APC for any additional information. Inquiries will be accepted up to five business days before the closing time. Should a consultant find any discrepancies, omissions, ambiguities, or conflicts with the RFP requirements, it will be the responsibility of the consultant to bring the matter to the attention of the specified individual above, within five business days before the closing time. Failure to do so will result in the consultant accepting all responsibility for the decisions made regarding their proposal submission. 3. Description of the Project Attached is the Terms of Reference describing the project to be undertaken by the selected consultant. It is recommended that consultants review existing planning documents to gain a better understanding of planning policies and document structure. 4. Consultant Experience All interested consultants will provide a minimum of three references with their proposal submission that can confirm the quality of work completed for similar projects. Three samples of similar projects will also be included with the proposal submission that briefly describes the client, purpose, process, and outcome of the project. 5. Team Structure of Consultant Should the consultant be comprised of two or more consulting firms, one firm must act as the team lead for the purpose of completing the project. This project is a joint municipal endeavor, however Brazeau County will deal directly with the firm named as team lead, and the management and compensation for additional firms will be the responsibility of the team lead. A list of all firm names, principals, and team qualifications will be required with the proposal submission in order to be accepted. 6. Project Completion Date It is anticipated that the consultant will be selected by August 4, 2017 and project commencement will be no later than November 2017. Final completion of the project with adoption by Councils is proposed for no later than May 2018. 7. Proposal Evaluation and Awarding Proposals will be evaluated on the following criteria: RATED CRITERIA POINTS POINT WEIGHT MAXIMUM POINTS Project Team Experience 0 to 10 x 2 20 Understanding of Project 0 to 10 x 3 30 Methodology 0 to 10 x 2 20 3 P a g e

Project Schedule 0 to 10 x 1 10 Price (maximum all-inclusive cost of $132,500) 0 to 10 x 2 20 TOTAL - - 100 Scoring is based on a scale of 0 to 10. A score of 0 points means the consultant did not complete the proposal requirement or they did not understand the requirement to correctly fulfill it. A score of 5 points means the consultant has come close to completing the requirement; however, the information provided suggests there are more efficient methods to complete the requirement. A score of 10 points means the consultant completed the requirement and exceeded requirement expectations. Points ranging between the above defined point values will be at the discretion of the evaluator and the information provided within the proposal. Assignment of points for Price will be determined by the number of proposals received and ranked lowest price (10 points) to highest price (1 point). All other proposals will be ranked within a decimal range of 2 to 9 points as determined by the number of proposals received. A budget must be provided, to a maximum all-inclusive cost of $132,500. Following the evaluation process, the proposal with the most points will be awarded the contract to complete the work defined within the Terms of Reference. The selected consultant will be notified within five business days following the completion of the evaluation process. An interview process may be conducted by the County with two or more consultants, prior to awarding the contract, should proposals be ranked within 6.5 points of each other. 8. Rejection of Proposals The Client reserves the right to reject any and all proposals received as a result of this request and to cancel this solicitation at any time prior to the execution of a contract. 9. Incurring Costs The Client is not liable for any costs or expenses incurred by consultants in the preparation or submission of their proposals or for attendance at any meetings related to this request for proposal prior to the issuance of a contract. 10. Final Negotiations The Client reserves the option to negotiate the final costs, scope of work and modified terms and conditions as well as the option to limit or include parties at the County s sole and full discretion in such negotiations. 11. Delay with Negotiations If a written contract cannot be negotiated within a reasonable period of time with the selected consultant, the Client may, at its sole discretion at any time thereafter, terminate negotiations with the consultant 4 P a g e

and either negotiate a contract with the next qualified consultant or choose to terminate the solicitation process and not enter into a contract with any of the consultants. 12. Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy This request for proposal is subject to all applicable legislation including the Municipal Government Act, the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, the bylaws and policies. Terms of Reference Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley Intermunicipal Development Plan Review 1. Context Brazeau County surrounds the Town of Drayton Valley and together have a population of 15,006. The Brazeau County and Town of Drayton Valley region is the heart of west-central Alberta where industry and commerce join forces with outdoor recreation adventures and western culture, creating a vibrant and growing community. Approximately a 1.5 hour drive southwest of the City of Edmonton, the Brazeau County and Town of Drayton Valley area plays an important role as a service center and hub of economic activity for the region. 2. Purpose of Review Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley are seeking the services of a qualified professional planning consultant to undertake the review of Intermunicipal Development Plan 779-11. Both Town and County Councils and administration have identified areas of focus that the consultant will review and provide feedback as to how specific regulations shall be amended to meet the needs of both municipalities. These areas of focus are: i) Determining an updated intermunicipal dispute resolution process to meet the current needs of both municipalities. The current process in the IDP has proven ineffective on some occasions and requires updating to ensure solutions for intermunicipal disputes can be reached in the future, in a timely matter. Multiple processes are currently being sought as options and should include an emphasis on local process. ii) iii) iv) Reviewing and updating the planning and referral areas to reflect statutory planning, existing development and joint infrastructure assets in both the Town of Drayton Valley and Brazeau County. Confirming the updated growth management strategy reflects statutory plans and growth within Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley. Establishing clear direction and mapping on joint delivery of services such as water, sewer, roads, storm water, fire services, recreation and trails. 5 P a g e

v) Updating statistics such as population and employment forecasts and land demand for Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley sourced from each municipality and Statistics Canada. vi) vii) viii) ix) Reviewing and updating circulation and referral requirements for statutory plans, redistricting s or text amendments, road closures, subdivision applications and development permit applications. Determining areas of noncompliance with adopted statutory plans of the Town and County and intermunicipal agreements to facilitate moving towards Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework s. A list of the plans and noncomplying policies will be created for both Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley to review and undertake a statutory plan review at a future date. The IDP will be part of the Brazeau County and Town of Drayton Valley Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework. Utilizing public engagement sessions to receive input from landowners within the Plan area and other affected stakeholders. x) Utilizing public engagement sessions to receive input regarding future growth areas. While the consultant will be required to address the identified areas of focus, it should be noted that the areas of focus are a minimum requirement for successfully completing the review. It is anticipated that additional items will require attention through the preparation of the Intermunicipal Development Plan with feedback from both Councils, administration, and the public. 3. Municipal Development Plans The Brazeau County Municipal Development Plan was adopted in 2011 to provide guidance with the overall planning framework for the County. The Plan sets priorities to ensure that long term planning will be undertaken in a manner that is sustainable and protects the agricultural and rural development interests of the municipality. The County is committed to cooperating with neighbouring municipalities, provincial departments and agencies, aboriginal groups, local community organizations, regional stakeholders and commercial interests to further the economic goals of the municipality and strengthen the need for environmental conservation and protection. The Municipal Development Plan is currently under review and is anticipated to be adopted by October 2017. The Town of Drayton Valley Municipal Development Plan was adopted in 2012 to guide management of land uses within the Town. The Plan outlines future land uses, the manner and proposals for future development, provisions for transportation systems and the provision of municipal services and facilities and the coordination of land use and infrastructure with Brazeau County. Various Area Structure Plans (ASP) are in stages of development in newly annexed area of the Town. 6 P a g e

4. Current Intermunicipal Development Plan (IDP) In 2011, Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley completed an Annexation Settlement Agreement (ASA) to extend the Town boundary and lay the groundwork for cooperative development of a long term land use strategy and growth management plan. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Implementation Plan was adopted shortly after to successfully implement the ASA. An outcome of these agreements was the adoption of Intermunicipal Development 779-11 in 2012. The IDP provides a framework for the long-term growth and development of the lands surrounding the Town of Drayton Valley and describes the magnitude and distribution of the various regional services and land use types to satisfy the region s long term needs. The current IDP states a review and update shall be completed within 5 years of adoption. Both Brazeau County and the Town of Drayton Valley are requesting a comprehensive review of the Intermunicipal Development Plan to ensure all areas of focus can be properly amended in a timely manner to ensure that a complete IDP can be adopted in 2018. 5. Consultant The County is requesting proposals from qualified professional planning consultants with extensive experience in formulating Intermunicipal Development Plans with dispute resolution processes in Alberta. The selected consultant will complete the required work outlined in the work program agreed to by Brazeau County and the consultant. 6. Project Team The project team will consist of the consultant s staff and County and Town staff. Municipal staff will act as a resource for the consultant s staff in order to provide the requested municipal data. The project lead is the Director of Planning and Development, Brazeau County. The consultant will be the project manager and ensure personnel are properly assigned and timelines are met. The consultant will prepare the new Intermunicipal Development Plan; including amendments, regulations and schedules, and prepare and present the document at the required public engagement meetings. County staff, in providing requested municipal data, will ensure a current copy of the Intermunicipal Development Plan is provided, as well as any other planning hierarchy documents that are necessary for the successful completion of this project, such as Area Structure Plans, Area Redevelopment Plans, Outline Plans, Overlay Plan, Department Strategies, or the like. A Steering Committee will be established utilizing the membership of County and Town Council and selected County and Town staff. This may include up to two Councillors from each municipality, the Reeve and Mayor, the CAO or designate and Directors. Project milestones will be presented to the Steering Committee for approval prior to proceeding with the next task. Other stakeholders will be consulted as required and will be expected to provide the requested information in a timely manner. Municipal staff will work with the consultant to assist with procuring said requests. 7 P a g e

7. Work Program The Intermunicipal Development Plan review will be undertaken in three generalized phases. These phases may be further clarified by the consultant; however, the County expects at a minimum that the project will proceed in the recommended order. Public consultation will be a large component of the project and it is expected that the consultant will be able to utilize a number of public engagement strategies that will be effective for the given audience. Consultation will not be limited to only the public, and the consultant should be able to demonstrate effective communication skills when interacting with stakeholders, provincial departments and agencies, County and Town Council and administration. The proposed phases are as follows: Phase 1: Background Review and Analysis The consultant will begin the project with a startup meeting with the Steering Committee to outline the roles and responsibilities of all parties. It is expected that one meeting per month will be scheduled with the Steering Committee to report on the status of the project and receive feedback on the direction of the project. A background report will be compiled outlining the current policies affecting the areas of focus and any other policy suggestions requiring attention as a result of public consultation. Pubic engagement sessions will be conducted and will cover the areas of focus plus any other topics required by the consultant to complete the project. PowerPoint presentations may be used to communicate information with the steering committee and the public. Phase 2: Preparation of Intermunicipal Development Plan A draft Intermunicipal Development Plan will be prepared by the consultant and submitted to the Steering Committee for review and feedback. Public consultation should occur prior to final approval of the draft IDP by the steering committee to ensure the document is user friendly for the public and to measure the level of support by the public for the regulations being suggested. A final draft IDP will be submitted to the Steering Committee for approval prior to first reading of the Plan by Council. Phase 3: Dispute Resolution Processes The consultant will facilitate meetings with Brazeau County Council, Town of Drayton Valley Council and municipal staff to redefine a dispute resolution process which meets the needs of Council and administration for both municipalities. The consultant will provide recommendations on joint dispute resolution mechanisms, procedures and processes which will be discussed and decided on at these meetings. A new process (or processes) should account for how each municipality addresses Council on direction for matters of dispute and consider recent planning disputes occurring between the two communities to provide for a more locally based streamlined process. Phase 4: Plan Adoption The consultant will present the final draft Municipal Development Plan to Council for first reading. Following first reading, the consultant will provide a public notice indicating the date, time and place of the public hearing to be held for the Intermunicipal Development Plan. After the public hearing has been closed, second and third reading will be given to the Plan. The consultant will provide all final copies of the approved Plan in accordance with the deliverables criteria. 8 P a g e

8. Project Schedule The project schedule provided by the consultant should meet the indicated milestones below. Any changes to the schedule must be agreed to by the consultant and the Client. It is anticipated that the consultant will be selected by August 4, 2017 and project commencement will be no later than November 2017. Final completion of the project with adoption by Council is proposed for no later than May 2018. Phase Task & Milestone Date 1 1. Client administration start up September 2017 1 2. Project startup with Steering Committee appointment and engagement No later than November 2017 1 3. Background Report submitted to Steering Committee December 2017 2 4. Draft IDP for Steering Committee review January 2018 3 5. Dispute resolution processes meetings Early February 2018 2 6. Final Draft of IDP for Steering Committee approval Late February 2018 4 7. Receive first reading from Council March 2018 4 8. Public hearing and receive second reading from Council April 2018 4 9. Receive third reading from Council No later than May 2018 9. Deliverables All materials created will be easily transferable for display on the Clients websites. Newsletters, brochures and all other forms of communication required to inform the public will be prepared by the consultant in full colour format. Presentations shall include the use of PowerPoint wherever possible. The following documents will be required to be submitted upon completion of the Intermunicipal Development Plan: a) Fifteen bound color copies of the final IDP, including all maps, illustrations and schedules; b) Two unbound original print ready colour copies of the final IDP; c) Two electronic copies of the final IDP document in Microsoft Word Compatibility Mode format; d) Two electronic color copies of the final IDP document in PDF format ; e) Two electronic color copies of the final IDP schedules in PDF and in the original mapping software; f) Two CDs or memory sticks of all and any related colour photos, graphics, presentations given during the project and maps, in common, Brazeau County and Town of Drayton Valley compatible formats; 9 P a g e

g) All Complete mapping files in a County and Town Compatible format (files of each bylaw schedule, complete with all (logically labeled) shapefiles which form the schedule; h) Two hard copies, and two digital copies of all presentation boards and materials; and i) All database material received from the Province, the County, the Town, or any other agencies, boards or commissions as part of this review, and all database materials produced by the consultant. 10. Public Consultation Public engagement is critical to the success of the project and the consultation process must be clearly detailed by the consultant. The methods and tools for engaging the public in each phase must be described showing how effective feedback can be received. At a minimum, a public engagement session will be conducted to receive feedback prior to a presentation of a draft IDP to the Client s Council s and one public engagement prior to public hearing. Notice of the sessions will be posted in the local newspaper and on the County and Town websites at least two weeks prior to the session date. Each session must present proposed concepts for the public to consider. The public engagement strategies will be detailed in the consultant s proposal to determine the level of effectiveness expected with the methods being utilized. 10 P a g e