Ambulatory Emergency Care in. South Wales. Les Ala Royal Glamorgan Hospital. South Wales. AEC meeting Oct 2014

Similar documents
Ambulatory Emergency Care in South Wales

The Amb Score. A pilot study to develop a scoring system to identify which emergency medical referrals would be suitable for Ambulatory Care.

Ambulatory Emergency Care A Flexible Approach to Ambulatory Care at Pennine Acute Hospitals. The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Corporate Services Employment Report: January Employment by Staff Group. Jan 2018 (Jan 2017 figure: 1,462) Overall 1,

DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF ACUTE MEDICINE

NHS Performance Statistics

NHS performance statistics

AMBSCORE in action. Karen Smith AEC Advanced Nurse Practitioner Good Hope Hospital Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust

Influence of Patient Flow on Quality Care

NHS performance statistics

The Manchester Model

Seven Day Working: in Practice Clinicians Perspective. Jonathan Vickers Consultant surgeon Dec 2015

MET CALLS IN A METROPOLITAN PRIVATE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

The New Clinical Research Landscape Incentives, Opportunities and Support Offered by the NIHR

ABC s of PES. Greg Miller, MD MBA CMO Unity Center for Behavioral Health

Standardising Acute and Specialised Care Theme 3 Governance and Approach to Hospital Based Services Strategy Overview 28 th July 2017

Change Management at Orbost Regional Health

Redesign of Front Door

Urgent Care Short Term Actions to Improve Performance

Patient Sticker Syncope Ambulatory Emergency Care Pathway

Patient Sticker Blood Transfusion Ambulatory Emergency Care Pathway

HomeFirst. Most importantly, we patients prefer and hope to be at home not in hospital, so I think this service is the way of the future.

A&E Clinical Quality Indicators

Ambulatory Emergency Care Watford sees Impact of Ambulatory Emergency Care within a Fortnight. West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Influence of Patient Flow on Quality Care

Developing Work Experience Placements for Schools. Will McConnell

Improving Care, Delivering Quality Reducing mortality & harm in Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust

Enhancing Psychosocial Care for Patients with Palliative Care Needs in the Acute Medical Wards

Overview of a new study to assess the impact of hospice led interventions on acute use. Jonathan Ellis, Director of Policy & Advocacy

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

The Glasgow Admission Prediction Score. Allan Cameron Consultant Physician, Glasgow Royal Infirmary

Same day emergency care: clinical definition, patient selection and metrics

HOW TO DO POST-HOC RESPONSE REVIEWS

London s Urgent and Emergency Care Collaborative

Collaborative Working to reduce hospital admissions. Dr Firdaus Adenwalla Annette Davies Beth Griffiths

Rapid Assessment and Treatment (R.A.T.) Team to the Rescue. The Development and Implementation of a Rapid Response Program at a Regional Facility

On the first day of the rotation, please report to the Cardiology Lobby, 5th Floor of the ACC Building, at 8:30 am.

WEST HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Based on performance data available as at 11 th January 2018

NHS Electronic Referrals Service. Paper Switch Off an update Digital Health Webinar 4 May 2018

Countywide Emergency Department Ambulance Patient Transfer of Care Report Performance Report

Improving Clinical Outcomes The Case for Electronic ED Door to EKG Time Monitoring

Monthly and Quarterly Activity Returns Statistics Consultation

Ambulatory Care Unit Royal Free Hospital. Dr Tara Sood Dr Andres Martin

CHC-A Continuity Dashboard. All Sites Continuity - Asthma. 2nd Qtr-03. 2nd Qtr-04. 2nd Qtr-06. 4th Qtr-03. 4th Qtr-06. 3rd Qtr-04.

Case Study: Cass Regional Medical Center

Northumberland Frail Elderly Pathway. Dr David Shovlin Fiona Brown

An overview of the planning process, findings and emerging proposals for the future

GP OUT OF HOURS SERVICE

Integrating Telemedicine into mental Health Care

Change in the Acute Setting. Dr Veronica Devlin Lean Leader NHS Lanarkshire

NSL LINCOLNSHIRE HEALTHWATCH PRESENTATION Ambulance NHS Trust Provision of Non- Emergency Patient Transport

Winter/Surge Capacity Plan 1 st December 2013 to 31 st March Position as at September 2013

Linking the LAS with Health & Social Care. 6 th December 2016

Section 1 - Key Performance Indicators

Unscheduled care Urgent and Emergency Care

Acceleration for ACS. NSTEMI Event 09 November. Outputs from Table Discussions

Alberta First Nations Continuing Care Needs Assessment - Health and Home Care Program Staff Survey -

National Clinical Audit & Patient Outcome Programme: An update

Adapting to changing times.. The challenge & the power of person-centredness

WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS

Sutton Homes of Care Vanguard Programme

Nottingham University Hospitals Emergency Department Quality Issues Related to Performance

Operational Focus: Performance

SPSP Medicines. Prepared by: NHS Ayrshire and Arran

Ambulatory Emergency Care The Logical Way to Go

BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAPER COVER SHEET. Meeting Date: 1 st December 2010

Quality and Efficiency Support Team (QuEST) Directorate for Health Workforce and Performance

Patient-centered care - from buzz word to meaningful reality. Current Health Care System

Criteria Led Discharge Pilot NHS Ayrshire and Arran Lorna Loudon, Linsey Stobo, Fraser Doris Implementing CLD in Scotland

Seven day hospital services: case study. South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust

Health Board Report INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD

Transforming Healthcare Delivery, the Challenges for Behavioral Health

From Implementation to Optimization: Moving Beyond Operations

Performance Improvement Bulletin

2016/17 Activity Report April August/September 2016

Quality Management Report 2017 Q2

A New Model of Urgent and Emergency Mental Health Care

Storyboard Submission NHS Wales Awards Title Improving Patient Safety How ABHB Ward Pharmacists Monitor Elevated INRs

North West London Accident and Emergency Performance Report for the winter of 2016/17. North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee

Departments to Improve. February Chad Faiella RN, Terri Martin RN. 1 Process Excellence

Improving Patient Care through Remote Patient Monitoring

Northern Health - Acute Services. Evidence Based Practice Venous Thromboembolism Prevention

BEDSIDE REGISTRATION CAPE CANAVERAL HOSPITAL

Governing Body. TITLE OF REPORT: Performance Report for period ending 31st December 2012

Patient Care: Case Study in EHR Implementation. With Help From Monkeys, Mice, and Penguins. Tom Goodwin, MHA MIT Medical Cambridge, MA March 2007

Heart Failure Order Sets. Standardizing Care for the Heart Failure Patient 2012

Plan for investment of retained marginal rate payment for emergency admissions in Gloucestershire

Haringey and Islington

Ruchika D. Husa, MD, MS

improve access to quality primary healthcare services in Nigeria

Urology Clinical Forum. 11 th March 2015

Mental Health Liaison Workshop

JANUARY 2018 (21 work days) FEBRUARY 2018 (19 work days)

meaningful reality Katie Coleman, MSPH

Chan Man Yi, NC (Neonatal Care) Dept. of Paed. & A.M., PMH 16 May 2017

DELIVERING THE LONDON QUALITY STANDARDS AND 7 DAY SERVICES

Service Transformation Report. Resource and Performance

Reducing Elective Waits: Delivering 18 week pathways for patients. Programme Director NHS Elect Caroline Dove.

Prime Contractor Model King s Fund Nick Boyle Consultant Surgeon 27 March 2014

Overall rating for this trust Good. Inspection report. Ratings. Are services safe? Requires improvement. Are services effective?

Transcription:

Ambulatory Emergency Care in South Wales Les Ala Royal Glamorgan Hospital South Wales AEC meeting Oct 2014

Ambulatory Emergency Care in South Wales Les Ala Royal Glamorgan Hospital South Wales AEC meeting Oct 2014

Format Our experience in practicing Ambulatory Care Development of and Use of the Amb Score What we learnt on how to set up an AECU service

Royal Glamorgan Hospital 2014 Small Acute DGH 570 Beds 40-50 patients per 24 hours IN TOTAL assessed as unselected medical emergencies/urgent cases

Ambulatory Care RGH: 2000-2009 2 Trolleys, 2 Chairs Hybrid Pathway (DVT) Consultant Led Monday Friday 9am 5pm GP / A&E direct referral

Challenges of delivering Acute Medicine services at RGH Increase demand Increase referrals for assessment / admission Increase A&E attendance Resource constraints Lack of rapid access OPD/Hot specialty-based clinics Reduction in in-patient beds Inefficiencies Poor physical planning 30 % day-time (same day) discharge from AMU Inappropriate referral to AMU or Ambulatory Care or vice versa

Up until 2013 Acute Medical Unit (AMU) Acute Admissions Medical Day Unit (MDU) Ambulatory Care A&E

Ambulatory Care RGH: 2009-2013 2 bays (7 trolleys, 2 chairs) Consultant Led Cons SpR FP1 9am 5pm weekdays only

Number of Patients Number of patients managed entirely as outpatients (Ambulatory Care) by Acute Medicine 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Y2000 Y2001 Y2002 Y2003 Y2004 Y2005 Y2006 Y2007 Y2008 Y2009 Year

What if we had: Better patient selection for ambulatory care AND An ambulatory care unit near AMU BUT Separate from AMU?

What if we had: Better patient selection for ambulatory care

Who can be managed in Ambulatory Care Strang, G. The concept, delivery and future of medical ambulatory care. Clin Med 2008; 8: 276-279

OUR STUDY: Selecting AEC patients from the unselected general medical emergency in-take Phase 1: Derivation of the Amb Score Phase 2: Internal Validation

Phase 1 Derivation: May / June 2010 What factors determine whether an emergency-referred GP patient is discharged within 12 hours of arrival in hospital? 282 Emergency GP referrals to on-call medics Discharge within 12 hours (Ambulatory Group) 143 Admitted for 48 hours (Admission Group) 139

Variable Admission group (%) n=139 Ambulatory group (%) n=143 Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) Mean age (SD) 71.2(16.2) 57.2(17.5) <0.01 Age 30-39 5 (3.6) 16 (11.2) 0.3 (0.1-0.8) <0.01 Age 40-49 6(4.3) 20(14.0) 0.3(0.1-0.7) <0.01 Age 50-59 11(7.9) 23(16.1) 0.4(0.2-0.9) <0.05 Age 80 52 (37.4) 13(9.1) 6(3.1-11.6) <0.01 2.4(1.1-5.2) Male sex 61(43.9) 41(28.7) 1.9(1.2-3.2) <0.01 1.9(1.1-3.5) Can eat / drink normally 132 (95) 143 (100) Undefined Ambulant 124 (89.2) 143 (100) Undefined Access to transportation 54 (38.8) 127 (88.8) 0.07(0.04-0.2) <0.01 0.1(0.05-0.2) Family support or carers available 102(73.4) 128 (89.5) 0.3(0.1-0.6) <0.01 IV treatment not anticipated 74 (53.2) 139(97.9) 0.02(0.007-0.1) <0.01 0.1(0.009-0.08) Not acutely confused 121 (87.1) 141(98.6) 0.05(0.006-0.4) <0.01 0.1(0.02-0.6) No new sphincter problems 131 (94.2) 143 (100) Undefined If chest pains, ACS not suspected 128 (92) 131 (91.6) 1.07(0.4-2.6) 0.44 Significant bleed not suspected 136 (97.8) 131 (98.6) 0.5(0.04-5.4) 0.05 No new neurological deficit 119 (85.6) 134 (93.7) 0.4(0.16-0.9) <0.05 Normal temperature 118(84.9) 129(90.2) 0.1(0.02-0.5) <0.01 Normal respiratory rate 128 (92.0) 103 (72.0) 0.9(0.3-2.8) <0.05 Normal oxygen saturation ( 93%) 112(80.6) 126(88.1) 0.15(0.05-0.5) <0.01 Heart rate 50-140 bpm 135 (97.1) 133 (93.0) 0.5(0.05-5.7) 0.50 Systolic BP 100-200 mmhg 121 (87.1) 139 (97.2) 0.2(0.04-0.5) <0.01 MEWS 0 70 (50.4) 104 (72.7) 0.4(0.2-0.6) <0.01 0.5(0.2-0.9) MEWS 2 17(12.2) 5 (3.5) 3.8(1.4-10.7) <0.01 MEWS 3 12(8.6) 4 (2.8) 3.3(1.03-10.4) <0.05 MEWS 4 11(7.9) 2 (1.4) 6(1.3-27.9) <0.01 GCS 15 129 (92.8) 143 (100) Undefined No past history coronary artery disease 74 (53.2) 85 (59.4) 0.8(0.3-1.7) 0.25 No past history of heart failure 87 (62.6) 97 (67.8) 0.6(0.1-3.7) 0.45 No past history of arrhythmia 77 (55.4) 91 (63.6) 0.6(0.2-1.5) 0.12 No past history of diabetes 74 (53.2) 89 (62.2) 0.5(0.2-1.2) 0.07 No past history of stroke or TIA 82 (59.0) 93 (65.0) 04(0.1-1.4) 0.08 No past history of renal disease 79 (56.8) 94 (65.8) 0.5(0.2-1.3) 0.07 No past history of chromic lung disease 65 (46.8) 79 (55.2) 0.6(0.3-1.2) 0.07 Not discharged within previous 30 days 101 (72.7) 125 (87.4) 0.2(0.07-0.5) <0.01 0.3(0.2-0.7)

Independent variables Variable Admission group (%) n=139 Ambulatory group (%) n=143 P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) Age 80 52 (37.4) 13(9.1) <0.01 2.4(1.1-5.2) Male sex 61(43.9) 41(28.7) <0.01 1.9(1.1-3.5) Access to transportation 54 (38.8) 127 (88.8) <0.01 0.1(0.05-0.2) IV treatment not anticipated 74 (53.2) 139(97.9) <0.01 0.1(0.009-0.08) Not acutely confused 121 (87.1) 141(98.6) <0.01 0.1(0.02-0.6) MEWS 0 70 (50.4) 104 (72.7) <0.01 0.5(0.2-0.9) Not discharged within previous 30 days 101 (72.7) 125 (87.4) <0.01 0.3(0.2-0.7)

The Amb Score: Sex Female 0 Male -0.5 Age <80 years 0 80 years -0.5 Access to transport Yes 2 No 0 Will likely need IV Rx No 2 Yes 0 Acutely confused No 2 Yes 0 MEWS MEWS = 0 1 Discharged last 30 days Total (Maximum 8) MEWS 1 0 No 1 Yes 0

Phase 2: Internal validation May/June 2011 Can the Amb Score predict discharge within 12 hours of hospital assessment? 343 Emergency GP and A&E referrals to on-call medics Discharge within 12 hours (Ambulatory Group) 115 Admitted for 48 hours (Admission Group) 228 What are the Amb Scores of each patients in EACH Group?

Verification of the Amb Score Admission group (%) n=228 Ambulatory group (%) n=115 OR (95% CI) Female sex 97 (42.5) 75 (65.2) 0.4 (0.2-0.6) p<0.01 Age < 80 136 (59.6) 108 (93.9) 0.2 (0.1-0.3) p<0.01 Access to personal / public transport 132 (57.9) 109 (94.8) 0.1 (0.03-0.2) p<0.01 IV treatment NOT anticipated 82 (40.0) 106 (92.2) 0.1 (0.03-0.1) p<0.01 NOT acutely confused 198 (86.8) 113 (98.3) 0.1 (0.03-0.5) p<0.01 MEWS score = 0 72 (31.6) 77 (67.0) 0.2 (0.1-0.4) p<0.01 NOT discharged within last 30 days 187 (82.0) 106 (92.2) 0.5 (0.2-0.8) p<0.01 Mean Amb Score (SD) 4.2 (1.8) 7.1 (1.1) p<0.01

sensitivity Receiver Operator Curve 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 AUROC 0.91 (0.88-0.94) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1-specificity If Amb Score 5, patient is more likely to be discharged within 12 hours! Sensitivity: 96% (90-98) Specificity: 62% (55-68)

What if we had: An ambulatory care unit near AMU BUT Separate from AMU?

Current practice.. AMU 25 Beds (Admissions) AEC Unit 6 Trolleys (Ambulatory Care)

Now we have what we asked, can we make it work? 1. Can we increase AECU through put reduce AMU admissions AND

Advanced Paramedic GP A&E Who Decides: If thought to be Ambulatory Bed Managers ADMISSION or AMBULATORY 1. GP 2. A&E doctors 3. Bed Managers How to decide: 1. Clinical features 2. Referrer s assessment 3. Amb score...sometimes!!! For Ambulatory Care For Admission AECU AMU Circa January 2014

Ambulatory Emergency Care Unit (AECU), Ground Floor near A&E AMU (Ward 6) First Floor above A&E 6 Trolleys 9am to 5pm Mon - Fri 25 Beds Month New Review Total Sep-13 156 63 219 Oct-13 212 62 274 Nov-13 172 71 243 Dec-13 190 53 243 Jan-14 203 82 285 Feb-14 173 64 237 Month Number Sep-13 N/A Oct-13 930 Nov-13 879 Dec-13 898 Jan-14 966 Feb-14 919

Where were patients seen? AECU: 20 % Discharged from AMU after PTWR: 30% Total emergency / Urgent referrals (40-50 per day)

Is that good enough?

Advanced Paramedic If thought to be Ambulatory GP Front Door Triage (NEWS, Amb Score) ADMISSION AMBULATORY or A&E Med SpR / AECU team Who Decides: 1. GP 2. A&E doctors 3. Med SpR 4. Triage Nurse 5. AECU Team How to decide: 1. Clinical features 2. Referrer s assessment 3. Amb score For Ambulatory Care For Admission AECU AMU Circa February 2014

So with a) Front Door Triage (including Use of Amb Score) for GP referrals and b) Med SpR taking A&E referrals

Changes in new patients numbers 1200 1000 SpR taking A&E referrals Amb Score used in front door triage 800 600 400 AMU AECU 200 0 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14

Amb Score prediction for ambulatory care small sample of 98 consecutive GP-referred patients initially for admission but triaged at front door before final decision: Amb score predicts admission (Amb < 5) Amb score predicts ambulatory care (Amb 5) Admitted to AMU Seen in AECU & discharged 17 (36%) 2 (4%) 19 30 (64%) 49 (96%) 79 Total 47 51 98 P<0.001 Total

1. Can we increase AECU through put reduce AMU admissions AND Total number admitted to AMU reduced 96% of those that Amb Score predicted ambulatory went to AECU (and discharged) 40 % of GP referrals for admission diverted to AECU (September / October 2014 Data)

What other interventions did occur 1200 1000 SpR taking A&E referrals Amb Score used in front door triage 800 600 400 200 AMU AECU ACP cover intake 9-5 ACP cover intake 9-5 & morning PTWR 0 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14

What else? If patients were ear-marked for admission (no prior Amb Score calculated at triage), can the Amb Score calculated just before PTWR be used to aid PTWR discharge?

PTWR discharge rates with and without Amb Score (after admission) June / July 2014 283 PTWR No Amb Score 113 Amb Score (calculated just prior to ACP PTWR) 170 33% discharge (Dr X 35%) 36% discharge (Dr X 42%)

Why not see more patients in AECU? - time of arrivals (beyond our control) 6 GP referrals arriving by Ambulance 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 GP referrals arriving by own transport

Things that worked for us Co-location BUT separate Ambulatory (AECU) versus Admissions (AMU) 2 different teams (Acute Medicine vs on -call team) Front door triage for GP referrals SpRs taking A&E referrals?acps cover intake 9-5?ACP doing morning PTWR on night admissions

Future Plans: Enhance Front Door Triage (Staff, Space, Time)? Extend hours of business Encourage A&E / Med SpR / GPs to think of Ambulatory Care Enhance direct Paramedic referral to AECU?Extend AECU opening hours

GP and A&E reminder Cards Leslie.Ala@Wales.nhs.uk

Ambulatory Care..what we learnt on how to set it up Location, location, location Ideally close to A&E & AMU (?separate?integrated) Waiting facilities Consulting rooms Trolleys People Enthusiastic capable clinicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, PA, OT & Physio, Discharge liaison input Clerical staff Senior management Diagnostic support Pathology Radiology ETT / ECHO / PFT Pharmacy Clinical guidelines / pathways / patient flow processes Who to take the calls? Who / How to decide if Ambulatory Referral pathways to specialists Clinical Outcomes & Process Measures with robust IT support Activity Re-admission rates (including UNEXPECTED admission from AECU) Patient satisfaction Cost savings

Summary Our process (and challenges we faced) in managing Acute & Emergency Medicine patients Simple tool that helps in AEC management in OUR locality If you think it might help you, please try it out. Our experience in setting up our AECU.

Diolch yn fawr Any questions?

Format Our experience in practicing Ambulatory Care Development of and Use of the Amb Score What we learnt on how to set up an AECU service

Royal Glamorgan Hospital 2014 Small Acute DGH 570 Beds 40-50 patients per 24 hours IN TOTAL assessed as unselected medical emergencies/urgent cases

Ambulatory Care RGH: 2000-2009 2 Trolleys, 2 Chairs Hybrid Pathway (DVT) Consultant Led Monday Friday 9am 5pm GP / A&E direct referral

Challenges of delivering Acute Medicine services at RGH Increase demand Increase referrals for assessment / admission Increase A&E attendance Resource constraints Lack of rapid access OPD/Hot specialty-based clinics Reduction in in-patient beds Inefficiencies Poor physical planning 30 % day-time (same day) discharge from AMU Inappropriate referral to AMU or Ambulatory Care or vice versa

Up until 2013 Acute Medical Unit (AMU) Acute Admissions Medical Day Unit (MDU) Ambulatory Care A&E

Ambulatory Care RGH: 2009-2013 2 bays (7 trolleys, 2 chairs) Consultant Led Cons SpR FP1 9am 5pm weekdays only

Number of Patients Number of patients managed entirely as outpatients (Ambulatory Care) by Acute Medicine 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Y2000 Y2001 Y2002 Y2003 Y2004 Y2005 Y2006 Y2007 Y2008 Y2009 Year

What if we had: Better patient selection for ambulatory care AND An ambulatory care unit near AMU BUT Separate from AMU?

What if we had: Better patient selection for ambulatory care

Who can be managed in Ambulatory Care Strang, G. The concept, delivery and future of medical ambulatory care. Clin Med 2008; 8: 276-279

OUR STUDY: Selecting AEC patients from the unselected general medical emergency intake Phase 1: Derivation of the Amb Score Phase 2: Internal Validation

Variable Admission group (%) n=139 Ambulatory group (%) n=143 Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) Mean age (SD) 71.2(16.2) 57.2(17.5) <0.01 Age 30-39 5 (3.6) 16 (11.2) 0.3 (0.1-0.8) <0.01 Age 40-49 6(4.3) 20(14.0) 0.3(0.1-0.7) <0.01 Age 50-59 11(7.9) 23(16.1) 0.4(0.2-0.9) <0.05 Age 80 52 (37.4) 13(9.1) 6(3.1-11.6) <0.01 2.4(1.1-5.2) Male sex 61(43.9) 41(28.7) 1.9(1.2-3.2) <0.01 1.9(1.1-3.5) Can eat / drink normally 132 (95) 143 (100) Undefined Ambulant 124 (89.2) 143 (100) Undefined Access to transportation 54 (38.8) 127 (88.8) 0.07(0.04-0.2) <0.01 0.1(0.05-0.2) Family support or carers available 102(73.4) 128 (89.5) 0.3(0.1-0.6) <0.01 IV treatment not anticipated 74 (53.2) 139(97.9) 0.02(0.007-0.1) <0.01 0.1(0.009-0.08) Not acutely confused 121 (87.1) 141(98.6) 0.05(0.006-0.4) <0.01 0.1(0.02-0.6) No new sphincter problems 131 (94.2) 143 (100) Undefined If chest pains, ACS not suspected 128 (92) 131 (91.6) 1.07(0.4-2.6) 0.44 Significant bleed not suspected 136 (97.8) 131 (98.6) 0.5(0.04-5.4) 0.05 No new neurological deficit 119 (85.6) 134 (93.7) 0.4(0.16-0.9) <0.05 Normal temperature 118(84.9) 129(90.2) 0.1(0.02-0.5) <0.01 Normal respiratory rate 128 (92.0) 103 (72.0) 0.9(0.3-2.8) <0.05 Normal oxygen saturation ( 93%) 112(80.6) 126(88.1) 0.15(0.05-0.5) <0.01 Heart rate 50-140 bpm 135 (97.1) 133 (93.0) 0.5(0.05-5.7) 0.50 Systolic BP 100-200 mmhg 121 (87.1) 139 (97.2) 0.2(0.04-0.5) <0.01 MEWS 0 70 (50.4) 104 (72.7) 0.4(0.2-0.6) <0.01 0.5(0.2-0.9) MEWS 2 17(12.2) 5 (3.5) 3.8(1.4-10.7) <0.01 MEWS 3 12(8.6) 4 (2.8) 3.3(1.03-10.4) <0.05 MEWS 4 11(7.9) 2 (1.4) 6(1.3-27.9) <0.01 GCS 15 129 (92.8) 143 (100) Undefined No past history coronary artery disease 74 (53.2) 85 (59.4) 0.8(0.3-1.7) 0.25 No past history of heart failure 87 (62.6) 97 (67.8) 0.6(0.1-3.7) 0.45 No past history of arrhythmia 77 (55.4) 91 (63.6) 0.6(0.2-1.5) 0.12 No past history of diabetes 74 (53.2) 89 (62.2) 0.5(0.2-1.2) 0.07 No past history of stroke or TIA 82 (59.0) 93 (65.0) 04(0.1-1.4) 0.08 No past history of renal disease 79 (56.8) 94 (65.8) 0.5(0.2-1.3) 0.07 No past history of chromic lung disease 65 (46.8) 79 (55.2) 0.6(0.3-1.2) 0.07 Not discharged within previous 30 days 101 (72.7) 125 (87.4) 0.2(0.07-0.5) <0.01 0.3(0.2-0.7)

Independent variables Variable Admission group (%) n=139 Ambulatory group (%) n=143 P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) Age 80 52 (37.4) 13(9.1) <0.01 2.4(1.1-5.2) Male sex 61(43.9) 41(28.7) <0.01 1.9(1.1-3.5) Access to transportation 54 (38.8) 127 (88.8) <0.01 0.1(0.05-0.2) IV treatment not anticipated 74 (53.2) 139(97.9) <0.01 0.1(0.009-0.08) Not acutely confused 121 (87.1) 141(98.6) <0.01 0.1(0.02-0.6) MEWS 0 70 (50.4) 104 (72.7) <0.01 0.5(0.2-0.9) Not discharged within previous 30 days 101 (72.7) 125 (87.4) <0.01 0.3(0.2-0.7)

The Amb Score: Sex Female 0 Male -0.5 Age <80 years 0 80 years -0.5 Access to transport Yes 2 No 0 Will likely need IV Rx No 2 Yes 0 Acutely confused No 2 Yes 0 MEWS MEWS = 0 1 Discharged last 30 days Total (Maximum 8) MEWS 1 0 No 1 Yes 0

Phase 2: Internal validation May/June 2011 Can the Amb Score predict discharge within 12 hours of hospital assessment? 343 Emergency GP and A&E referrals to on-call medics Discharge within 12 hours (Ambulatory Group) 115 Admitted for 48 hours (Admission Group) 228 What are the Amb Scores of each patients in EACH Group?

Verification of the Amb Score Admission group (%) n=228 Ambulatory group (%) n=115 OR (95% CI) Female sex 97 (42.5) 75 (65.2) 0.4 (0.2-0.6) p<0.01 Age < 80 136 (59.6) 108 (93.9) 0.2 (0.1-0.3) p<0.01 Access to personal / public transport 132 (57.9) 109 (94.8) 0.1 (0.03-0.2) p<0.01 IV treatment NOT anticipated 82 (40.0) 106 (92.2) 0.1 (0.03-0.1) p<0.01 NOT acutely confused 198 (86.8) 113 (98.3) 0.1 (0.03-0.5) p<0.01 MEWS score = 0 72 (31.6) 77 (67.0) 0.2 (0.1-0.4) p<0.01 NOT discharged within last 30 days 187 (82.0) 106 (92.2) 0.5 (0.2-0.8) p<0.01 Mean Amb Score (SD) 4.2 (1.8) 7.1 (1.1) p<0.01

sensitivity Receiver Operator Curve 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 AUROC 0.91 (0.88-0.94) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1-specificity If Amb Score 5, patient is more likely to be discharged within 12 hours! Sensitivity: 96% (90-98) Specificity: 62% (55-68)

What if we had: An ambulatory care unit near AMU BUT Separate from AMU?

Current practice.. AMU 25 Beds (Admissions) AEC Unit 6 Trolleys (Ambulatory Care)

Now we have what we asked, can we make it work? 1. Can we increase AECU through put AND reduce AMU admissions

Advanced Paramedic GP A&E Who Decides: If thought to be Ambulatory Bed Managers ADMISSION or AMBULATORY 1. GP 2. A&E doctors 3. Bed Managers How to decide: 1. Clinical features 2. Referrer s assessment 3. Amb score...sometimes!!! For Ambulatory Care For Admission AECU AMU Circa January 2014

Ambulatory Emergency Care Unit (AECU), Ground Floor near A&E AMU (Ward 6) First Floor above A&E 6 Trolleys 9am to 5pm Mon - Fri 25 Beds Month New Review Total Sep-13 156 63 219 Oct-13 212 62 274 Nov-13 172 71 243 Dec-13 190 53 243 Jan-14 203 82 285 Feb-14 173 64 237 Month Number Sep-13 N/A Oct-13 930 Nov-13 879 Dec-13 898 Jan-14 966 Feb-14 919

Where were patients seen? AECU: 20 % Discharged from AMU after PTWR: 30% Total emergency / Urgent referrals (40-50 per day)

Is that good enough?

Advanced Paramedic If thought to be Ambulatory GP Front Door Triage (NEWS, Amb Score) ADMISSION AMBULATORY or A&E Med SpR / AECU team Who Decides: 1. GP 2. A&E doctors 3. Med SpR 4. Triage Nurse 5. AECU Team How to decide: 1. Clinical features 2. Referrer s assessment 3. Amb score For Ambulatory Care For Admission AECU AMU Circa February 2014

So with a) Front Door Triage (including Use of Amb Score) for GP referrals and b) Med SpR taking A&E referrals

Changes in new patients numbers 1200 1000 SpR taking A&E referrals Amb Score used in front door triage 800 600 400 AMU AECU 200 0 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14

Amb Score prediction for ambulatory care small sample of 98 consecutive GP-referred patients initially for admission but triaged at front door before final decision: Amb score predicts admission (Amb < 5) Amb score predicts ambulatory care (Amb 5) Admitted to AMU Seen in AECU & discharged Total 17 (36%) 2 (4%) 19 30 (64%) 49 (96%) 79 Total 47 51 98 P<0.001

1. Can we increase AECU through put AND reduce AMU admissions Total number admitted to AMU reduced 96% of those that Amb Score predicted ambulatory went to AECU (and discharged) 40 % of GP referrals for admission diverted to AECU (September / October 2014 Data)

What other interventions did occur 1200 1000 SpR taking A&E referrals Amb Score used in front door triage 800 600 400 AMU AECU ACP cover intake 9-5 ACP cover intake 9-5 & morning PTWR 200 0 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14

What else? If patients were ear-marked for admission (no prior Amb Score calculated at triage), can the Amb Score calculated just before PTWR be used to aid PTWR discharge?

PTWR discharge rates with and without Amb Score (after admission) June / July 2014 283 PTWR No Amb Score 113 Amb Score (calculated just prior to ACP PTWR) 170 33% discharge (Dr X 35%) 36% discharge (Dr X 42%)

Why not see more patients in AECU? - time of arrivals (beyond our control) 6 GP referrals arriving by Ambulance 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 GP referrals arriving by own transport

Things that worked for us Co-location BUT separate Ambulatory (AECU) versus Admissions (AMU) 2 different teams (Acute Medicine vs on -call team) Front door triage for GP referrals SpRs taking A&E referrals?acps cover intake 9-5?ACP doing morning PTWR on night admissions

Future Plans: Enhance Front Door Triage (Staff, Space, Time)? Extend hours of business Encourage A&E / Med SpR / GPs to think of Ambulatory Care Enhance direct Paramedic referral to AECU?Extend AECU opening hours

GP and A&E reminder Cards Leslie.Ala@Wales.nhs.uk

Ambulatory Care..what we learnt on how to set it up Location, location, location Ideally close to A&E & AMU (?separate?integrated) Waiting facilities Consulting rooms Trolleys People Enthusiastic capable clinicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, PA, OT & Physio, Discharge liaison input Clerical staff Senior management Diagnostic support Pathology Radiology ETT / ECHO / PFT Pharmacy Clinical guidelines / pathways / patient flow processes Who to take the calls? Who / How to decide if Ambulatory Referral pathways to specialists Clinical Outcomes & Process Measures with robust IT support Activity Re-admission rates (including UNEXPECTED admission from AECU) Patient satisfaction Cost savings

Summary Our process (and challenges we faced) in managing Acute & Emergency Medicine patients Simple tool that helps in AEC management in OUR locality If you think it might help you, please try it out. Our experience in setting up our AECU.

Diolch yn fawr Any questions?