Information Analytics Expertise OCTOBER 24, 2016 MODELING THE US HEALTH WORKFORCE: SUMMARY OF THE RN SUPPLY AND DEMAND FORECASTING MEETING (MONTANA, 2016) AND IMPLICATIONS FOR MODELING IHWC 2016 TECHNICAL SKILLS DAY Tim Dall Managing Director, Life Sciences IHS Markit +1 202 870 9211 Tim.Dall@ihs.com
RN Supply and Demand Forecasting Meeting Big Sky, Montana, July 2016 Meeting hosted by Montana State University, Center for Interdisciplinary Health Workforce Studies Funding from the U.S. Bureau of Health Workforce, Health Resources and Services Administration Meeting brought together ~20 health workforce researchers and nurse workforce experts Goal: improving nurse workforce forecasts to provide information needed by policy makers, employers, educators, researchers and others working to assure a strong, appropriately sized, and capable nursing workforce One day focusing on modeling nurse supply One day focusing on modeling nurse demand Opportunities to share methods and data, and provide constructive criticism 2
Two Demand Modeling Approaches Presented Adjusted Risk Choice & Outcomes Legislative Assessment (ARCOLA) model Microsimulation model used to simulate insurance enrollment patterns under the Affordable Care Act Estimated demand for services based on insurance changes estimate demand for nurses based on service demand Main challenge with this approach is the ARCOLA model is designed to model changes in insurance coverage; this study was a workforce application Health Workforce Simulation Model (HWSM) Microsimulation model that simulates health care use for a representative sample of the population, then simulates demand for health workforce based on projected demand for services Main challenge with this approach is projecting future changes in care use and delivery patterns under emerging care delivery models 3
Two Supply Modeling Approaches Presented Cohort-based model Approach models how many nurses from a cohort (specified by birth year) will remain in the workforce over time Approach provides insights to workforce participation rates over time within a cohort of nurses Main challenge of this approach is it does not capture large variation across cohorts in number of individuals entering nursing as a profession Microsimulation-based approach Starts with a database of nurses and simulates individual career choices Approach to modeling workforce decisions (active in the labor force, hours worked, retirement) appears to produce aggregate patterns similar to the cohort-based approach Faces many of the same challenges of the cohort-based model: external shocks can cause nurse workforce behavior to deviate from historical patterns 4
Summary of Goals and Criteria for Building Workforce Models Provide the most accurate projections possible Provide flexibility to model wide range of scenarios reflecting new policies, emerging trends in care delivery, and other (e.g., economic) factors Build on solid theoretical underpinnings Build dynamic model: integrate professions and specialties Adaptable to different geographic units (national, state, local level) Provide platform for continued model improvement; incorporate new research as it becomes available Make model transparent (through reports and presentations) 5
Flow Diagram for the Supply Component of HWSM Starting Year Supply Demographic and Geographic Characteristics Data Sources: American Community Survey, association registries, state licensure files New Entrants Demographic and Geographic Characteristics Data Sources: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, professional associations Attrition Mortality Retirement Career Change End Year Supply By Demographic and Geographic Characteristics Age/Sex Specific Mortality Data Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Workforce Participation and Hours Worked Data Sources: American Community Survey, survey data from state licensure boards, occupation-specific surveys 6
Data Sources: Starting Supply American Community Survey (ACS) Active supply defined as nurses working or seeking employment Multiple years data used Current work using 2014 ACS, with 5-year file (2010-2014) used for some analyses Distribution by state, age, sex and education level For current work, using licensure data from states that have voluntarily provided data (GA, OR, SC, TX); ACS data for all other states Data strength and weakness ACS: Cannot distinguish between nurses working in nursing positions and in positions that do not require a nursing degree ACS: Information on patient care hours not available ACS: Small sample size for smaller states Licensure files: most states have cleaned their data so the data are in good shape; desire for HRSA supply estimates to use best available source of data and consistent with numbers published by individual states; shorter time lag between when data are generated and used 7 7
HRSA 2004 report HRSA 2014 report HRSA 2016 report First Time, U.S. Educated Candiates Taking NCLEX-RN Trends in Number of US Educated First Time NCLEX-RN Takers, 2001-2015 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 99,186 110,703 119,565 157,957 155,098 157,882 150,266 144,554 140,882 134,727 129,111 80,000 87,171 60,000 68,759 70,692 76,688 40,000 20,000-2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Data Source: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Exam Statistics and Publications, 2001 to 2015 data from various reports. Year 8
Cumulative Probability Retired from Nursing RN Retirement Patterns 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Nurse Age Texas South Carolina Oregon (Intention, adj) HRSA Model Estimated patterns using 2010-2015 licensure data from Oregon, South Carolina, and Texas; and 2008 Sample Survey of RNs (for nurses under age 50). 9
Summary Regression Results for RNs Parameter Predicting Hourly Wage a Predicting Hours/Week a Predicting Labor Force Participation, age <50 (CI) b Intercept -2.67 ** 35.15 ** Unemployment rate (state, year) -0.15 ** 0.05 * 1.03 1.01 1.05 State occupation mean hourly wage 0.85 ** Predicted hourly wage 0.01 0.97 0.96 0.99 Age 35 to 44 3.87 ** 0.26 ** Age 45 to 54 5.21 ** 1.20 ** Age 55 to 59 5.79 ** 0.88 ** Age 60 to 64 5.74 ** -0.31 ** Age 65 to 69 4.70 ** -4.54 ** Age 70+ 2.07 ** -8.57 ** Age 30-34 0.69 0.63 0.77 Age 35-39 0.89 0.79 1.00 Age 40 to 44 0.97 0.86 1.08 Age 45 to 49 1.12 0.99 1.27 Male 1.18 ** 2.78 ** 0.71 0.58 0.87 Age 30-34 * male 2.20 1.59 3.06 Age 35-39 * male 2.81 1.96 4.02 Age 40 to 44 * male 2.63 1.87 3.70 Age 45 to 49 * male 1.94 1.38 2.74 Year 2011-0.38 ** 0.14 0.93 0.84 1.03 Year 2012 0.39 ** 0.21 * 0.92 0.83 1.02 Year 2013 0.14 0.30 ** 0.93 0.84 1.05 Year 2014-0.29 ** 0.38 ** 0.97 0.85 1.10 Non-Hispanic black -0.15 2.28 ** 1.32 1.17 1.49 Non-Hispanic other -0.66 ** 1.43 ** 1.23 1.10 1.37 Hispanic 1.12 ** 1.43 ** 1.38 1.19 1.60 Have nursing baccalaureate degree 2.55 ** -0.24 ** 0.98 0.91 1.05 Having nursing graduate degree 4.10 ** 1.56 ** 0.91 0.80 1.03 Population % suburban 12.99 ** 0.73 2.27 1.33 3.89 Population % rural 0.56 1.41 ** 0.77 0.52 1.15 Sample size 150,504 150,504 89,370 R-squared 0.12 0.04 Notes: Analysis of the American Community Survey; a Ordinary least squares regression coefficients. Statistically significant at the 0.01 (**) or 0.05 (*) level. b Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) from logistic regression. Comparison groups are female, year=2010, non- Hispanic white, age <35 (for wages and hours) or age <30 (for labor force participation). Labor force participation regression uses only clinicians under age 50. 10
Hours Worked per Week Comparison of Actual to Predicted Hours Worked by RNs: Example: Data for the State of South Carolina 40 35 30 25 20 15 Actual Predicted 10 5 0 Less than 35 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 years and more RN Age 11
Percentage Growth in RN Supply & Demand (relative to 2015) Projected Percentage Growth in RN Supply & Demand: Example: Data for the State of Georgia 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 32% 28% 27% 25% 23% 18% Supply: 10% inc new grads Supply: Ret 2yrs later Baseline Demand Supply: Status Quo Supply: Ret 2yrs earlier Supply: 10% dec new grads 5% 0% 0% 2015 2020 2025 2030-5% Year 12
13
Published RN Supply and Demand Projections Forthcoming 2016 IHS 14