Welcome to Modified Stage 2: The Final Rule for MU in Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, RevolutionEHR

Similar documents
Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Meaningful Use Stage 2

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

EHR/Meaningful Use

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

during the EHR reporting period.

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

The History of Meaningful Use

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Alaska Medicaid Program

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

June 15, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt,

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR

Transcription:

Welcome to Modified Stage 2: The Final Rule for MU in 2015 Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, RevolutionEHR

Support

Quest to Attest and Quest for Excellence Facebook groups Support

Ask About Meaningful Use Support

Registration Each provider needs to register for Incentive program Not required to declare Start or End dates EHR Certification Number needs to be generated Registration guidance document on Insight

What is Modified Stage 2? Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for MU 2015-2017 and Stage 3 released in Q1 2014 1.reduce reporting requirements 2.align reporting periods with calendar year 3.modify patient engagement measures Final Rule released October 6 Ideas discussed tonight are official!

What is Modified Stage 2? Stage 1 and Stage 2 blended into one unified concept 10 total objectives + Clinical Quality Measure reporting All objectives are required. No Core/Menu differentiation Eliminates topped out objectives i.e., Patient Demographics 25th percentile: 97% 50th percentile: 99% 75th percentile: 99.8%

Stages of MU First Year of Meaningful Use Stage of Meaningful Use 2015 2016 2017 2018 2011 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2012 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2013 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2014 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2015 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 2016 n/a Modified Stage 2 Modified Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3

Reporting Periods 2015 any 90 consecutive days for all EPs (1/1/15-12/31/15) 2016 any 90 consecutive days for new EPs full calendar year for all others 2017 full calendar year for all Medicare EPs (including new EPs) in modified Stage 2 any 90 consecutive days for providers moving to Stage 3 early * EPs in the Medicaid arm of the incentive program will always have an any 90 consecutive day 1st year

Modified Stage 2 Reorganization Core 1 - CPOE Core 2 - erx Core 3 - Demographics Core 4 - Vital Signs Core 5 - Smoking Status Core 6 - Clinical Decision Support Core 7 - Incorporate Clinical Lab-Test Results Core 8 - Patient Lists Core 9 - Preventative Care Core 10 - Patient Electronic Access Core 11 - Clinical Summaries Core 12 - Patient Specific Educational Resources Core 13 - Medication Reconciliation Core 14 - Summary of Care Core 15 - Immunization Registries Data Submission Core 16 - Protect Electronic Health Information Core 17 - Secure Electronic Messaging Menu 1 - Syndromic Surveillance Menu 2 - Electronic Notes Menu 3 - Imaging Results Menu 4 - Family Health History Menu 5 - Report Cancer Cases Menu 6 - Report Specific Cases

Modified Stage 2 Reorganization Protect Patient Health Information Clinical Decision Support Computerized Provider Order Entry Electronic Prescribing Health Information Exchange Patient Specific Education Medication Reconciliation Patient Electronic Access Secure Electronic Messaging Public Health Reporting

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Protect Patient Health Information Objective Measure Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the CEHRT through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities. Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including addressing the security (to include encryption) of data stored in Certified EHR Technology in accordance with requirements in 45 CFR 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the EP s risk management process None None

Modified Stage 2 Objectives SRA can be performed anytime during the calendar year as long as it is completed by the day of attestation. 3rd party assistance not required, but a very good idea considering the evolution of audits OIG HIPAA CMS Essentials of the Security Risk Analysis webinar with Marni Anderson

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Clinical Decision Support Objective Measures Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 Use clinical decision support to improve performance on high-priority health conditions 1. Implement five clinical decision support interventions related to four or more clinical quality measures at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period 2. The EP has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders during the EHR reporting period can exclude from measure 2 Proposed Objective: Implement one clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty along with the ability to track compliance with that rule Proposed Measure: Implement one clinical decision support rule. It is also proposed that drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks in measure 2 above must be met since it s the same as a Stage 1 objective

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Clinical Decision Support

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Computerized Provider Order Entry Objective Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication, laboratory, and radiology orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local, and professional guidelines 1. More than 60 percent of medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry Measures 2. More than 30 percent of laboratory orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry 3. More than 30 percent of radiology orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication, laboratory, or radiology orders during the EHR reporting period can exclude from that measure Proposed Measure: More than 30 percent of medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using computerized provider order entry Providers due for Stage 1 in 2015 (or 2016) can exclude from measures 2 and 3 as they do not exist in Stage 1

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Computerized Provider Order Entry Medication Orders Lab and Radiology Orders

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Electronic Prescribing Objective Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx) Measure More than 50 percent of all permissible prescriptions, or all prescriptions, written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology 1. Any EP who writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions during the EHR reporting period Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 2. An EP who does not have a pharmacy within his or her organization and does not have a pharmacy that accepts electronic prescriptions within 10 miles of the EP's practice location at the start of his or her EHR reporting period Proposed Measure: More than 40 percent of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Health Information Exchange Objective The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or refers their patient to another provider of care provides a summary care record for each transition of care or referral The EP that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care: Measure 1. uses CEHRT to create a summary of care record 2. electronically transmits the summary to a receiving provider for more than 10 percent of transitions of care and referrals Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 Any EP who refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period EP may claim an exclusion for this objective since Stage 1 does not have an equivalent

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Summary of Care

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Patient-Specific Education Objective Use clinically relevant information from Certified EHR Technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient Measure Patient-specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology are provided to more than 10 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 Any EP who has no office visits during the EHR reporting period EP may claim an exclusion for the measure if they did not intend to select the Stage 1 Patient Specific Education menu objective

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Patient-Specific Education 1 2

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Medication Reconciliation Objective The EP who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation Measure Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 The EP performs medication reconciliation for more than 50 percent of encounters with new patients and inbound transitions of care. Any EP who saw no new patients and was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the EHR reporting period EP may claim an exclusion for the measure if they did not intend to select the Stage 1 Medication Reconciliation menu objective

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Medication Reconciliation and Health Information Exchange are complimentary objectives Inbound electronic Transition of Care document can be used for Medication Reconciliation Medication Reconciliation

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Medication Reconciliation Get new patients involved in process of obtaining official medication list

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Medication Reconciliation Denominator all new patients automatically included inbound referrals need TOC Document Received box checked Numerator number of patients in denominator who have Medication reconciliation performed box checked

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Patient Electronic Access Objective Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP An EP must meet both measures: Measures 1. More than 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information 2. At least one patient seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or their authorized representatives) views, downloads, or transmits his or her health information to a third party Any EP who: Exclusions 1. Neither orders nor creates any of the information listed for inclusion as part of the measures; or 2. Conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 EP may claim an exclusion for measure 2 since Stage 1 does not have an equivalent

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Patient Electronic Access Measure 1 establish PHR credentials sign encounter within 4 business days Measure 2 promote use of the PHR to have patients View, Download, or Transmit their information V/D/T links available in About Me or Appointments area of PHR

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Patient Electronic Access Measure 1 establish PHR credentials sign encounter within 4 business days Measure 2 promote use of the PHR to have patients View, Download, or Transmit their information V/D/T links available in About Me or Appointments area of PHR

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Secure Electronic Messaging Objective Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information Measure During the EHR reporting period, the capability for patients to send and receive a secure electronic message with the provider was fully enabled Any EP who: 1. has no office visits during the EHR reporting period, or Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 2. conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period EP may claim an exclusion since Stage 1 does not have an equivalent

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Secure Electronic Messaging Objective Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information Measure During the EHR reporting period, the capability for patients to send and receive a secure electronic message with the provider was fully enabled Any EP who: 1. has no office visits during the EHR reporting period, or Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 2. conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period EP may claim an exclusion since Stage 1 does not have an equivalent

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Public Health Reporting Proposed Objective Proposed Measures Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 The EP is in active engagement with a PHA or CDR to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using certified EHR technology, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice There are a total of four possible measures for this objective. EPs would be required to choose from measures 1 through 3, and would be required to successfully attest to any combination of two measures 3 available for each measure EP must report at least one measure unless they can exclude from all available measures

Modified Stage 2 Objectives Public Health Reporting Proposed Objective Proposed Measures Exclusions Alternate Specifications for EPs due for Stage 1 in 2015 The EP is in active engagement with a PHA or CDR to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using certified EHR technology, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice There are a total of four possible measures for this objective. EPs would be required to choose from measures 1 through 3, and would be required to successfully attest to any combination of two measures 3 available for each measure EP must report at least one measure unless they can exclude from all available measures

Public Health Reporting What is Active Engagement? The EP is moving toward the submission of real patient data. This can be demonstrated 1 of 3 ways: 1. Completed registration with a registry within 60 days after the start of reporting period 2. Testing of data submission process initiated 3. Actively submitting patient data

Public Health Reporting Exclusions: Do not count as satisfying a measure i.e. EP cannot exclude from Immunization Registry Reporting on grounds that they didn t perform any immunizations during reporting period and have that count as 1 of the 2 measures they need to meet. In the event that 2 measures don t apply, EP can report on whatever is applicable and claim an exclusion for the non-relevant measures If nothing applies or the EP wasn t planning on registry reporting in 2015, a full exclusion is possible. Engagement with the AOA s registry, MORE, is not required to demonstrate MU in 2015

MU Scorecards

Providers originally due for Stage 1 in 2015 MU Scorecards

Providers originally due for Stage 2 in 2015 MU Scorecards

Clinical Quality Measures Required part of being a Meaningful User Report on 9 measures that span 3 or more domains over 90 day period in 2015 Scores not important for Meaningful Use, but can be for other quality reporting programs Two methods to report CQM scores manually during attestation electronically through QualityNet portal

Clinical Quality Measures

Attestation The process by which you tell CMS how you did Attestation for 2015 reporting periods cannot take place until January 4, 2016 and must be completed by February 29, 2016. Preparation Print / capture MU and CQM scorecards on the day of attestation Save scorecards as they ll serve as proof in the event of an audit

Summary Reporting periods 2015: any 90 consecutive days (1/1/15-12/31/15) 2016: any 90 consecutive days for new EPs, full year for all others 2017: full year for all Medicare EPs (including new EPs) in Modified Stage 2 any 90 consecutive days for those who attempt Stage 3 early MU in 2015 involves 10 objectives based mainly on Stage 2 measures + Clinical Quality Measures Key Changes V/D/T Actual Use changes from >5% to equal to or greater than 1 Secure Messaging changes from >5% to Yes/No for having functionality enabled All public health reporting objectives consolidated into one objective with multiple measures Providers due for Stage 1 in 2015 have special exclusions and thresholds All EPs held to same standards in 2016 (except for CPOE) No attestation for 2015 reporting periods until 1/4/16-2/29/16

Questions? Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, RevolutionEHR bpaepke@revolutionehr.com