New Policy on Knowledge Cluster Initiative

Similar documents
Knowledge Cluster Initiative

Creating and Nurturing Startups That Can Contribute to the Development of New Key Industries

University Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem at the University of Tokyo

Call for Applications

Independent Administrative Agency National Hospital Organaization 平成27年度

The Japan Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (J.CLAIR), Singapore

Medical Innovation as a National Strategy

Study Abroad Crisis Management at MSSU

Current Situation of Academia-Industry Collaboration in Japan

Prize winner s voice

Keio University Annual Report on Research Activities. 2003o2004

Second Term Medium-range Industrial Cluster Plan

The Financial Position of Kyoto Prefecture. January, Kyoto Prefecture

Press Conference President of JST

Frameworks for Responses to Armed Attack Situations

Role and Activities of NGO on Export Control. Hiroshi NAKAO Center For Information On Security Trade Control (CISTEC) JAPAN

Strategic Fund for Establishing International Headquarters in Universities (SIH) FY2007 Open Symposium

Discussion points for the e-asia Joint Research FORUM (Toward "The East Asia Science and Innovation Area")

JETRO s Support for Business Expansion to Japan

Review Guidelines for FY2018 World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI) Application (tentative translation)

Support for SMEs New Business Activities in Japan. Small and Medium Enterprise Agency Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry July 2013

Health care innovations and medical technology: reaching the unreached

Initiatives to Protect the Lives and Property of the People as well as Securing the Territorial Land, Water and Airspace

GENERAL HEADQUARTERS SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS Public Health and Welfare Section WEEKLY BULLETIN

LEARNING FROM DISASTER SIMULATION DRILLS IN JAPAN

The Role of National Association in Incubator Development - Thoughts from Japanese Experiences -

FY2011. International Collaborative Research Program. Science and Technology Research Partnership for. Sustainable Development (SATREPS)

For Accelerating the Reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake. February 2014 NEMOTO Takumi, Minister for Reconstruction

Process for Establishing Regional Research Institutes

Tokyo, 20 th September 2017, Tokyo International Forum Dr. Florian Welter, Project Management Jülich, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH.

Research Project on Intellectual Property Strategy and Support Measures for Startups Final Report (Summary)

H2020 Policy Support Facility Peer Review of the Moldovan Research & Innovation System

PALM 5 LEADERS' DECLARATION ANNEX 2: ACTION PLAN

Richard Kelner Delegation of the European Union to Japan 20 th May 2013

Call for Nominations

Study Group for the Creation and Development of Start-ups. Final Report

Reform of Japan s Nuclear Safety Regulation

Invitation to Apply for Partnering Forum 2007

Beyond Pasteur s Quadrant

Waseda University s Global Engagement Strategy

Case: Building on Economic Assets in Akron, Ohio after the Decline of the Tire Industry 1

Section 3. Organization of the MOD/SDF

Second Stakeholders Workshop Brussels, 12 th June China s STI Policies and Framework Conditions

Activities of the Japan Medical Association Team in Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake

(Translation) FILE NO NOTICE OF THE 21ST ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Key Points 2002 Economic and Industrial Policy Forward-Looking Structural Reform toward Self-Sustained Growth (Provisional translation)

Introduction of Tokyo Institute of Technology. (Tokyo Tech) and Main Purpose of the Workshop including related activity at Tokyo Tech

UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES AND WORK. 21 December 2016

innovationisrael.org.il Endless Possibilities to Promote Innovation

Sarasota County. A Roadmap to a Robust and Agile Economy. Five-year Economic Development Strategic Plan. Executive Summary.

IEEE Japan Strategy. - Enhancing Member Value and Membership Growth. Lawrence Wong. Tokyo 8-9 November2014

Outline and Effects of the Comprehensive Support Project for the Long-Term Unemployed

The Michigan Initiative for Innovation & Entrepreneurship A consortium of public universities for transforming practice and culture

Chapter 4. Promotion of Comprehensive Measures to Reverse the Birth Rate Decline in a Society with a Decreasing Population


Chapter 2 Governance of the Education Sector and Disaster Risk Reduction

May 25, Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

Call for Entrepreneurship

CLUSTERS Typology and Training Needs. Intelspace Innovation Technologies SA

GENERAL HEADQUARTERS SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWOERS Public Health and Welfare Section WEEKLY BULLETIN

Ministerial declaration of the high-level segment submitted by the President of the Council

2012/SMEMM/010 Agenda Item: 2.4. SMEWG Chair Report. Purpose: Information Submitted by: SMEWG Chair

Overview Cluster Development Seed Fund Objectives Eligible Activities Eligible Applicants Eligible Costs Evaluation of Applications Reporting

Definition of Clean Tech. Presentation to E2Tech Forum March 13, 2013

Crossing the Valley of Death

Interaction with Local Communities and Japanese Citizens

The SBIR Partnership

2. Research Categories Depending on the content and the scale of the research, different research categories have been established. Research categorie

WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS

Case for Support Lee County Economic Development Group. Lee County A Five-Year Strategic Initiative to Spur Economic Growth in Lee County

Summary of Audit Results

HEAR MORE AT A FREE ANGELS AND GOVERNMENT FUNDING SEMINAR

STATE AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY East Central Region BACKGROUND THE REGION

JETRO Invest Japan Report 2017

CLUSTERING STRATEGY IN SME DEVELOPMENT : An Integral Development Supports

Action Plan for Startup India

We advance science and develop innovative technology to further economic growth and improve lives.

Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

East Japan s National Revival Plan

Making an Impact. Assessing the Benefits of Ohio s Investment in Technology Based Economic Development Programs

Creating a Legacy through Nursing Leadership, Innovation, and Global Connectivity

Overview of Final Evaluation Survey Results

REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FORUMS

Rankings by World Economic Forum & International Institute for Management Development 1 st in the world for:

Implementing Economic Policy for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: The Mexican Case. Lorenza Martinez April, 2012

Payments Enterprise Ireland Payments 8 Company Payments 8 Eligible Costs 9

Digital Economy.How Are Developing Countries Performing? The Case of Egypt

Global Financial City: Tokyo Vision

Global Activities of JST Strategic Basic Research Programs (CREST, PRESTO)

The Present State of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Russia

GOOD DESIGN AWARD 2015 GUIDEBOOK

Hong Kong Retail Management Association Submission on 2015 Policy Address and Budget Consultation 30 December 2014.

For Accelerating the Reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake. March, 2014

Under the High Patronage of H.E. Abdel Fattah El-Sisi President of the Arab Republic of Egypt

Business Oregon Annual Performance Progress Report Reporting Year 2016 Published: 10/3/2016 1:28:54 PM

BUsiness Horizon Quarterly

BOTHELL BIOMEDICAL MANUFACTURING INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP ZONE

Canada s Innovation and Skills Plan

(Translation) Notice Regarding Changes in Representative Director, etc.

Governance and Institutional Development for the Public Innovation System

Transcription:

New Policy on Knowledge Cluster Initiative (Provisional Translation) 10 October 2007 Regional Cluster Seminar SAEKI, Koji Director, Regional R&D Promotion Division MEXT 1

Outline Development of Program for Knowledge based Clusters Outline of 1 st Stage Review of 1 st Stage Policy Background for 2 nd Stage Principle of 2 nd Stage Program Selection of the Clusters 2

Regional R&D Policy 1 st S&T Basic Plan Promotion of understanding on S&T, basic & cutting edge R&D, support for S&T related facilities Establishment & expansion of collaborative research program among academia, private & government entities, strengthening of coordination activities Support for public research institutions in the region 3

Regional R&D Policy 2 nd S&T Basic Plan Formulation of regional knowledge based clusters Enriching sources of regional innovation Securing of professional coordinators to judge/apply technologies and the promotion of technological transfers Promotion of industry-academia-government collaboration by the local government 4

Regional R&D Policy 3 rd S&T Basic Plan Goal Building regional innovation systems and creating vital regions (3rd Science and Technology Basic Plan) Approaches (1) Formulation of regional clusters The government will continue to provide competitive support for cluster forming activities carried out under local initiatives. In doing so, the government will provide selective support to regions that have the potential to develop as world-class clusters and develop clusters across Japan with strength that utilize regional characteristics, however small in scale (2) Enriching sources of regional innovation Providing support to individual R&D activities of the regional universities etc 5

Structure of the Knowledge Cluster Initiative MEXT Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology MEXT selects areas and assists core organizations Cluster Creation Plans of Local Governments Local governments make their own action plans Intensive promotion of various projects for creating Knowledge Clusters Reforms of science and technology systems Technology innovation creation programs in which Universities take core part Cooperation Cooperative systems by industry, academia and government in which universities etc. take core part Setting up the Knowledge Cluster Headquarters (Control Tower) Promotion of supporting systems by S&T coordinators etc. Area with a high concentration of knowledge and industry Setting up Knowledge Cluster Headquarters Cooperative systems in which universities or other public research institutions take core part. Cooperation Universities, etc. Core Organizations Foundations or other corporations designated by local governments Sponsor research Cooperation Cooperation Planning /Implementation Firms and other related entities *Various projects Cooperation TLO, JST ** Conducting industry-academia-government successive joint research in which universities or other public institutions take core part Staffing with specialist Science and Technology Coordinators Promotion of Patenting, incubating and developing of research results Forums or other type of meeting on research results will be held Knowledge Cluster Initiative will positively cooperate with other relevant projects like the Industrial Cluster Project of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). 6 6

Selection process1 30 Regions selected as candidate (May 2001) [1 st Review] [R&D Center] Regions with emerging innovation centers based on public research institutes such as universities 55 45 [Potential of industries] 1Scale of major industries 3billion yen or 2Scale of machinery related industry 1 billion yen [2 nd Review] 30 candidates 1.Core R&D institute & tech seeds 2.Function for cooperation among academia, private & public sector 3.Human resources 4.Venture Capital 5.System for cooperation 6.Incubation facilities 7.Traffic infrastructures 7

Selection Process2 12 Clusters + Feasibility Study in 6 Region (April 2002) Selection Criteria 1.Basic criteria Focus on specified research area Designation of core organization Infrastructures 2.Technological review R&D potential Prospects for commercialization 3.Implementation system Potential of core organization Structure of Cluster headquarter 4.Initiatives of the region Science & technology policy system Future vision of the local government Initiatives by the local governemnt 8

18 clusters Knowledge Cluster Initiative 11Cluster(Started in 2002, end) 1Cluster(Started in 2002, active) 3Cluster(Started in 2003) 3Cluster(Started in 2004) Nagano-Ueda [Nanotech/ Materials] Sapporo [ IT ] Toyama-Takaoka [Life Sciences, Nanotech/ Materials, IT] Kansai Wide Area Cluster Osaka [Life Sciences] Kobe [Life Sciences] Ube [Life Sciences] Hiroshima [Life Sciences] Kanazawa [Life Sciences] Kyoto [Nanotech/ Materials] Sendai [ IT ] Gifu-Ogaki [Life Sciences] Nagoya [Nanotech/ Materials Environment] Hamamatsu [ IT, Life Sciences] Keihanna [IT, Life Sciences, Environment] Kyushu Wide Area Cluster Kitakyushu [IT, Env t] Fukuoka [ IT ] Takamatsu [Life Sciences] Tokushima [Life Sciences] 9

Midterm Review and Reflection on Resources Evaluation of the impact of the projects from long-term perspective Emphasis on independence and initiatives of the actors in the region Revision of the plan based on self evaluation Competitive environment Distribution of the budget based on review results 10

Midterm review-2 Criteria- 大項目中項目小項目 (1)Technological Review (R&D progress) 1.Project implementation (2)Initiative of the region 1Regional strategy & project 2Related activities & interactions (3)Implementing organization 2.Self evaluation (1)Technological review (R&D plan etc.) 3.Project plan etc. (2) Initiative of the region (3) Implementing organization 4.Prospect for the realization of planned cluster Progress & plan of each R&D 11

(3) Cooperation with Industrial Cluster Project of METI New Technology Seeds MEXT Knowledge Cluster METI Industrial Cluster Commercialization Market Needs Setting up committees for regional cluster promotion Encouraging cooperation between local implementing organizations Holding joint conferences to announce project results 12

Knowledge Cluster and Regional Cluster Strategy (Nagano) 13 ( 長野テクノ財団資料 )

Post-project Evaluation (Preliminary) Objective To understand the results of projects in 11 regions and to demonstrate the effect of Knowledge Cluster Initiative Basic reference for the deliberation of next program (Basic reference for the selection of 2 nd stage regions) 14

Post-project Evaluation (Preliminary) Data accumulation & analysis on the regions (including questionnaire for participants) Self-evaluation reports by the regions Hearing (by review-panel members & secretariat) Evaluation by the panel 15

Review Perspective Appropriateness of the project plan Effect of the Knowledge Cluster (R&D, Tech transfer, Commercialization etc.) Effectiveness of measures and organization for formulation of Knowledge Cluster Prospects for future development Over-all evaluation 16

Outline of Review Results (Plan) Regions with clear objectives and plan Hamamatsu, Kobe, Fukuoka, Nagano Several regions lack clear image of planned cluster or strategy to accomplish the objective 17

Outline of Review Results (R&D) Tangible output from science & technology aspects Formulation of basis for the development of cluster (multi-layered R&D results, advanced R&D facilities & equipments, enhancement of researchers pool) Highly evaluated R&D results 18

Outline of Review Results (Commercialization) Many regions produce prototype, but few regions achieve product sales and profit by commercialization Differences in achievements in application according to S&T fields Need for flexible evaluation system based on development phase of clusters to review commercialization aspect 19

Outline of Review Results (Human Development) Regions with enhanced researchers pool Expansion of human resources for cluster management through implementation of projects Human resources need to be harnessed by the region to develop cluster there 20

Outline of Review Results (Cooperation) Development in cooperation among various sectors (academia, industry, government) and networking in many regions Cooperation through collaborative R&D is important in the development (not only provision of simple forum) Awareness raising, cooperation, networking activities are not adequate in some regions 21

Overall Review Personnel/organization that will take initiative in cluster formulation is indispensable in cluster development Regions with tangible buildup in line with project objectives Hamamatsu, Nagano, Osaka, Fukuoka Clusters with global perspective Osaka + Kobe, Fukuoka + Kita-Kyushu Many regions remain in the early developmental stage (exchanges among researchers and companies, collaborative R&D, indication of commercialization) 22

Out-put of the Initiative FY 2002-2006 Patent applications - 2230 Commercialization, prototype production etc. - 803 Continued development under other programs (such as Regional Consortium R&D by METI) - 232 23

Achievements of the Program (Cooperative Framework) Impact on the management of universities Promotion of collaborative R&D in universities based on company management method Expansion of participating research institutes, companies and formulation of network among various sectors. <Number of Participants in collaborative R&D > Univ. Public Institute Private company personnel institute personnel institute FY2001-105 - 166 FY2002 1004 179 407 263 FY2003 1516 376 629 501 FY2004 1633 400 806 538 FY2005 1727 407 927 567 24 24

Achievements of the Program (Regional Initiative) Various regional initiatives have been started in relation to the initiative. Example <Kansai Wide-area Cluster> Support to Bio-tech company start-up thorough Lifesciences IP Fund (2004) <Kyushu Wide-area Cluster> Support to technology/product development by companies in system LSI Training of engineers through regional training programs Preferential treatment to LSI related companies in firm location subsidy 25

Resulst of Questionnaire Survey in 2007 Benefits for individual participants Unexpected learning about technology from expanded network 74% New ideas for research subject and commercialization from expanded network -67% Easier access to information in specialized field from expanded network 67% Easier access to information for research from other participants in the project 61% Easier access to information on business partners from coordinators and support organization 39% New contract and joint research with other participants 38% 2326

Knowledge Cluster Initiative 2 nd Stage Background Development of 1 st Phase Program Report by Regional R&D Policy Panel The 3 rd S&T Basic Plan Survey on Clusters Potential 27

Report by the Regional R&D Policy Panel <Objective and role of Regional R&D> To improve and diversify national S&T To activate regional economy and to materialize high quality living standard Policy tool as Science for Society 28

Report by the Regional R&D Policy Panel <Strategic Implementation of Regional R&D Program> Selection and Concentration and Implementation under Strategic Viewpoint National Innovation System and Allocation of R&D System Support Program according to the R&D Phase in Particular Region Consistency with National R&D Strategy 29

Report by the Regional R&D Policy Panel <Formulation of Regional Cluster> Strategic and prioritized support for the regions with good potential to achieve clusters with strong international competitiveness Nurture smaller clusters to make full use of regional characteristics to revitalize economy in the regions 30

Related Policies Comprehensive Strategy for Innovation (decided by CSTP) Strengthening system to create innovation, from seeds to fruits (1)Promotion of collaboration among private, academia and government sectors (2)Strengthening of regional innovation system (3)Continual funding, knowledge collaboration (4)Implementation of measures focused on Strategic prioritized S&T 31

Related Policies Innovation 25 (Cabinet decision June 2007) <Strategy for social system reform> 8Measures to realize active regional society Re-vitalizing regional industry Support for the development and commercialization of new products and services utilizing regional resources Support for industry build-up & cluster formulation based on initiatives of the local government Realization of compact city system 32

Survey on Cluster Development Prospect Clarify features common in world-class clusters Review technology/industry build-up etc. in regions under Knowledge Cluster Initiatives and other region Method: Bibliographic survey, data collection, questionnaire, interview, deliberation by a panel 33

Survey on Cluster Development Prospect Important features for Knowledge based Clusters 1.Resources in the region Brilliant researchers/tech seeds, human resources Demand Company strategy, competitive environment 2.Collaborative environment Network within the region Network beyond the region 3.Management 4.Motivation and initiatives of the center player 34

Main Features of the Knowledge Cluster Initiative (2 nd Stage) Selection and Concentration 18 regions (1 st Stage) Approximately 10 regions (2 nd Stage) Expansion in scale: 0.5 billion /year/ each region 0.5 ~ 1 billion /year/ each region Promotion of Regional Independence MEXT sets the minimum amount of expenditure by local actors to develop cluster (more than 1/2 of the national expenditure, including 1/2 of the total management expenditure (including personnel cost)) Pursuit of forming world-class innovative clusters 35

Structure of the Knowledge Cluster Initiative (2 nd Stage) Main Part of the Project ( 0.5~ 1billion / year) 0.1 billon is ear-marked for promoting collaboration with other relevant ministries (METI s Industrial Cluster etc) Expansion Program *1 (optional program) Over 0.5 billion / project / year) Maximum : 1/2 of the Main Part *1:MEXT sets aside certain part of the budget for the Expansion Program to encourage collaboration with other clusters and/or institutions in different regions (both in Japan and overseas) to enhance competitiveness. MEXT competitively finance the Expansion Programs on condition that the proposals of 36 the Main Part are adopted.

1 2 Past efforts and project results Effort by local actors to form internationally competitive cluster 3 Plan of Action 4 Evaluation Criteria in Selection (2 nd Stage) R&D (Evaluation by technology experts) 1-a Past efforts by local actors 1-b Results from the past efforts and projects 2-a Clarity and strategy of local vision to form cluster 2-b Independence and Initiative of local government 2-c Leadership in implementing local initiative 2-d Implementation of relevant policies and projects 2-e Promotion of regional independence 3-a Plan to utilize projects by other ministries (such as METI s Industrial Cluster) 3-b Cooperation with other regions/ interdisciplinary collaboration 3-c Strategy for commercialization 3-d Strategy for IPR management 3-e Strategy for fostering human resource 3-f Management structure and system 4-a R&D Potential 4-b R&D Strategy 4-c R&D Planning 4-d Excellence and Novelty of Technology 4-e Possibility of commercialization 37

Selection Result in 2007 47 outside experts evaluated the project proposals by 9 regions. 47 outside experts evaluated the project proposals by 9 regions. Selection Committee consisted of 12 outside experts (The chairperson was Dr.Yasuharu Suematsu, counselor of National Institute of Informatics. The vicechairperson was Tadao Kiyonari, counselor / former-president of Hosei University.) 35 outside experts in various technology fields formed the teams of reviewers to provide scientific and technological evaluation. (total 90 points) 80 75 Fukuoka / North Kyusyu 70 65 60 Nagano Kansai Sendai Hamamatsu <6 regions selected> 1Fukuoka / North Kyusyu / Iizuka 2Nagano 3Kansai 4Sendai 5Hamamatsu 6Sapporo 55 Sapporo 50 38

Back ground The Regional S&T Promotion Programs of MEXT Intensifying international competition by globalization Rapidly aging population and declining birth rate Advancing and diversifying S&T Creating persistent innovation Depressed local economy by hollowing out of industry Progress of decentralization and region revitalization Revitalizing local economy based on developing S&T Emerging concept of S&T for Society High public expectation for social contribution by universities Forming safe and appealing regions through returning R&D results to society Goal and approach Creating sustainable innovation in each region 3 rd S&T Basic Plan Building regional innovation systems and creating vital regions Forming regional clusters Aiming at creating persistent innovation through close networking of industrygovernment-academia around universities etc. whose R&D focus has excellent potential Network image of innovative cluster ( university company Sufficient resource of regional innovation Aiming at the creation of efficient and effective innovation by transferring technological seeds to practical application Policy of MEXT Support to forming regional clusters under local initiatives Developing into world-class innovative cluster attracting human, goods and money from around the world Developing small to medium-size clusters across Japan with strengths that utilize unique regional resources. Individual support for regional R&D Regional research institutes create outstanding research results that transfer to practical application ~ Leading to Innovation ~ Knowledge Cluster Initiative (The second stage) MEXT strongly supports the formation of world-class clusters while encouraging regional independence, in cooperation with relevant ministries such as METI City Area Program MEXT supports the creation of new business and R&D business that utilize unique regional resources through industry-academia-government ll b i Comprehensive Support Program for Creation of Regional Innovation Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) implements seamless support for discovering and transferring technological 39 seeds through community-based coordinate

KNOWLEDGE CLUSTER INITIATIVE (2 nd stage) Outline Budget in FY 2007: 5.5 billion In order to realize sustainable economic development, there is urgent need to strengthen regional innovation system. Following the results obtained during the 1 st stage of the Knowledge Cluster Initiative, MEXT strongly supports the formation of world-class clusters while encouraging regional independence, cooperation among relevant ministries particularly METI s Industrial Cluster- and focusing on a "Selection and Concentration approach. KNOWLEDGE CLUSTER INITIATIVE Background MEXT started the Knowledge Cluster Initiative in April 2002, following the 2nd S&T Basic Plan, cabinet-decision in March 2001, (the initiative currently concerns 18 regions see map). Results The formation of clusters has steadily progressed in each region. Developed industry-government -academia collaboration networks Practical Application of technology seeds produced by joint R&D for commercialization Progress of regional initiatives 18 regions : started 2002 (12) : started 2003 (3) :started 2004 (3) Progress is steady, but additional Investments are needed to ensure The sustainable creation of innovation. (In general, cluster formation takes over 10 to 30 years) 3 rd S&T Basic Plan Formation of regional clusters Long-term promotion of efforts based on strategic regional initiatives and collaboration among relevant organizations. Selective support to regions with the potential to develop world-class clusters by assessing their competitiveness and the progress of cluster formation, and development of clusters reflecting regional characteristics (however small in scale). KNOWLEDGE CLUSTER INITIATIVE (stage II) Flexible Budget Allocations Strategic support for regions with the potential to develop world-class clusters Flexible budget allocations to the regions according to their R&D field and their degree of progress Number of concerned regions: about 10 regions* Expansion in scale: 0.5~1 billion /year/each region *Regions that had not joined the 1 st stage can apply for the 2 nd stage Promotion of Regional Independence Sets the minimum amount of expenditure by local actors to develop cluster (more than 1/2 of the national expenditure, including 1/2 of the total management expenditure (including personnel cost)) Collaboration with other ministries Promotes utilization of projects of other ministries (such as METI s Industrial Cluster) to efficiently and effectively form regional cluster Expansion and Internationalization The potential and global competitiveness of clusters can be improved through the interdisciplinary cooperation and the collaboration with different regions. In this perspective, MEXT sets aside certain part of the budget for the Expansion Program to encourage collaboration with other clusters and/or institutions in different regions (both in Japan and overseas) to 40 enhance competitiveness.

City Area Program <52areas> ONODA- SHIMONOSEKI 18 [Nanotech/Materials] CENTRAL OITA 14 [Life Sciences] KURUME 15,18 [Life Sciences] SAGA ARIAKE SEA 17 [Environment] NAGASAKI-ISAHAYA -OMURA 15 [Life Sciences] KUMAMOTO 14,17 [Nanotech/Materials] KUMAMOTO SOUTH 15 [Environment] KAGOSHIMA CITY 14 [Life Sciences] THE MIYAKONOJO BASIN 16 [Environment] HARIMA 14 [Nanotech/Materials, Manufacturing] YONAGO- SAKAIMINATO 18 [Life Sciences] OKAYAMA SOUTH 14,17 [Manufacturing] MIYAZAKI NORTH COAST 17 [Life Sciences] TONO WAST 17 [Nanotech/Materials] LAKE SHINJI -NAKAUMI 14 [Environment] CENTRAL FUKUI 15,18 [Nanotech/Materials] MATSUYAMA 14 [Manufacturing] EHIME EAST 16 [Nanotech/Materials] CENTRAL AKITA 19 [Life Sciences] ISHIKAWA SOUTH 17 [IT] LAKE BIWA SOUTH 16,19 [Life Sciences] OSAKA-IZUMI 14[IT] OSAKA EAST 16 [Manufacturing] WAKAYAMA CITY 15,19 [Nanotech/Materials] THE YONESHIRO RIVER BASIN15,18 [Environment] YAMAGATA- YONEZAWA 14 [Nanotech/Materials] NIIGATA 14 [Life Sciences] KIRYU-OTA 14 [Nanotech/Materials] CENTRAL SAITAMA 19 [Life Sciences] CENTRAL OSAKA 19 [Nanotech/Materials] NAGAOKA 16,19 [Manufacturing] CENTRAL SHIZUOKA 14,17 [Life Sciences] TOYOHASHI 14,17 [IT] MIE-ISE BAY 16 [Nanotech/Materials] HIROSAKI 16,19 [Life Sciences] HAKODATE 15,18 [Life Sciences] YAMANASHI KUNINAKA 18 [Environment, Energy] THE FOOT OF MT. FUJI 16,19 [Life Sciences] TOKACHI 17 [Life Sciences] HACHINOHE 14 [Energy] CENTRAL IWATE -KAMAISHI 16,19 [Nanotech/Materials] THE KITAGAMI RIVER BASIN 14 [Nanotech/Materials] KORIYAMA 14,18 [Life Sciences] CENTRAL UTSUNOMIYA 15 [Manufacturing] KANTO PLAIN SAITAMA 17 [Environment] KASUMIGAURA 14 [Environment, Energy] TSUKUBA 14,17 [IT] KANAGAWA EAST COAST 18 [Manufacturing] YOKOHAMA COAST 17[Life Sciences] YOKOHAMA MIDLAND 19[Manufacturing] CHIBA-TOKATSU 14,17 [Life Sciences] SHONAN-CENTRAL KANAGAWA 18 [Environment] Program end region (20 areas) Development stage ( 14 areas) Starting/Basic stage (18areas) 41