QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA): SOURCES OF EVIDENCE - A MORE DETAILED GUIDE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADS

Similar documents
The Trainee Doctor. Foundation and specialty, including GP training

Contents... 2 ADR Introduction... 3 Postgraduate Training Quality Governance Framework... 4 ADR Process and Documentation... 6 GMC Standards for

HEALTH EDUCATION NORTH WEST ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT

Level 2: Exceptional LEP Review Visit by School Level 3: Exceptional LEP Trigger Visit by Deanery with Externality... 18

Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Principles and processes for externality in specialty education and training

Reference Guide. has bee. July 2012

The GMC Quality Framework for specialty including GP training in the UK

Contents. Foundation Programme Reference Guide 2016

Multi-Professional Deanery

Action Plan for Health Education Kent, Surrey and Sussex

Visit to Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Mental Health training in Foundation Programmes

Visit to The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust

Supervision of Trainee Doctors

Postgraduate Quality Assurance Visit. Report on Wales Deanery 2011/12

Visit report on Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust

Briefing note 3 Annex C Generic and demographic final questionnaire for clinical and educational supervisors.

CURRENT AND FUTURE RECOGNITION OF THOSE HOLDING EDUCATIONAL ROLES

Recommendations for safe trainee changeover

Validation Date: 19/11/2015. Ratified Date: 22/02/2016

Professional Support for Doctors in Training

Curriculum for Internal Medicine Stage 1 Training

WESSEX DEANERY OUT OF HOURS GUIDELINES (Aug 2013)

GP School Quality Monitoring Visits to GPSPT Programmes and Trusts

Training capacity and Rostering

Supporting the acute medical take: advice for NHS trusts and local health boards

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for pharmaceutical medicine

RQIA Provider Guidance Nursing Homes

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, April 2013

General practice education and training in the UK a thematic review

Quality Management in Medical Foundation Training: Lessons for Pharmacy

Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust Darent Valley Hospital INDUCTION HANDBOOK FOR THE ANAESTHETIC FACULTY GROUP

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for ophthalmology

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, June 2014

Review of the Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery

Quality Management in Pharmacy Pre-registration Training: Current Practice

GUIDANCE ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

GUIDELINES FOR JUNIOR DOCTORS USING THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS

Report of the analysis of the Modernising the New Doctor consultation

Revalidation FAQs for Trainees (October 2013)

Survey Results - Wessex Report Paper Number Report Author Felicity Sladen, Nikkie Marks Lead Director Simon Plint FOI Status

SPECIALTY TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR NUCLEAR MEDICINE AUGUST 2010

British Cardiovascular Society. Revalidation of cardiologists: Standards and Content of a portfolio for revalidation

Visit Report on NHS Grampian

The Royal London Hospital

Proposal to seek approval for an Innovative Post

GP School Quality Monitoring Visits to GPSPT Programmes Name of GPST Programme: WEST HERTFORDSHIRE Date of visit: 31 st July 2014

RQIA Provider Guidance Day Care Settings

GMC VISIT TO DEANERY REPORT

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for psychiatry

General Internal Medicine (GIM) ARCP Decision Aid AUGUST 2017

Response from The Royal College of Radiologists. 1. TRANSPOSITION Comments

SPECIALTY TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR NUCLEAR MEDICINE

NHS Governance Clinical Governance General Medical Council

INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS

MWF/2009/4/1 UPDATE ON WORKING TIME DIRECTIVE. Background

Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY ST3

European Working Time Directive

The Trainee Support Group

Leadership and management for all doctors

Potential challenges when assessing organisational processes for assurance of clinical competence in labs with limited clinical staff resource

School of Anaesthesia Visit to Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Executive Summary Date of visit: 5 th July 2016

Current status of training: Is it good enough?

NHS MEDICAL DIRECTOR S CLINICAL FELLOW SCHEME. Information for applicants 2012/13

Guidance on supporting information for revalidation

Quality Assurance of Dental Nurse Training

An Overview for F2 Doctors of Foundation Programme attachments to General Practice

Quality Assurance of Specialty Education and Training 2016 Pilot Activity Report

Continuing Professional Development Supporting the Delivery of Quality Healthcare

Guide to the Foundation Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) Process

BSc (Hons) Nursing Mental Health

Revalidation Annual Report

Equivalence Guidance for GMP Domain 1

Prepare surgical instrumentation and supplementary items for the surgical team

RESPIRATORY REGISTRAR TRAINEE INDUCTION PACK

Standards for pre-registration nursing programmes

SPONSORSHIP AND JOINT WORKING WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

Health Protection Agency East of England. East of England Deanery School of Public Health Public Health Specialty Training Programme

Job Description & Person Specification Job Title:

SPECIALTY TRAINING PROGRAMME IN PALLIATIVE MEDICINE IN WESSEX DEANERY

SPECIALIST TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE

Standards for the provision of teleradiology within the United Kingdom Second edition. Standards

A Guide to Psychiatry in the Foundation Programme

North School of Pharmacy and Medicines Optimisation Strategic Plan

NHSLA Risk Management Standards

Sources of evidence [note: you may reference other sources of evidence] Quarterly National Reporting Systems to the SHA on Waiting Times.

Scotland Deanery Policy on Enhanced Monitoring Authors Quality Workstream Leads A.R.McLellan, D.Bruce & D.Pollock

OSEAN Quality Criteria for Osteopathic Educational Providers

SPECIALTY TRAINING PROGRAMME IN OPHTHALMOLOGY IN WESSEX DEANERY

Review of Health Education Kent, Surrey and Sussex

MODERNISING SCIENTIFIC CAREERS

Taking informed consent for Doctors in Training Policy. Including marking of an operating site

Nursing, Health Visiting and Allied Health Professional Preceptorship Policy

Curriculum for Training for Advanced Critical Care Practitioners

CORE MEDICAL TRAINING PROGRAMME, WESSEX DEANERY

A Reference Guide to Core Medical Training in Iceland

Specification Level 4 Diploma in Therapeutic Counselling (TC-L4)

Response to the Department for Education Consultation on the Draft Degree Apprenticeship Registered Nurse September 2016 Background

Transcription:

QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA): SOURCES OF EVIDENCE - A MORE DETAILED GUIDE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADS The framework for the quality assurance of Radiology training has been outlined in the RCR document All you ever wanted to know about QA available on the College website. This document aims to provide more detailed guidance for those educational leads who are required to demonstrate compliance (either through Annual Reports or at the time of GMC/Deanery visits) with the generic standards for training laid down by the GMC and which underpin the Quality Assurance of postgraduate medical training in the UK. http://www.gmc-uk.org/trainee_doctor.pdf_39274940.pdf In 2011 the GMC published the Quality Improvement Framework (QIF), its blueprint for the Quality Assurance of medical education in the near future; http://www.gmc-uk.org/quality_improvement_framework.pdf_39623044.pdf It outlines the processes that the GMC will undertake. Key points for those involved in medical education lower down the training chain are: a) an intention to move to a more streamlined and proportionate mechanism b) application of regulatory resources where they will have the most impact c) minimisation of the duplication of evidence by receiving and using data that are gathered once and used for all partners. d) a move from the collection of historical data to real time shared data based on current training e) a streamlined GMC visits process targeted towards areas of risk and the introduction of random checks of Deaneries or LEPs (Local Education Provider) f) an increasingly robust approach to ensuring that trainers have been appropriately trained g) an acknowledgement that, to date, the development of quality control in LEPs has lagged behind that of other QA processes Evidence A critical element throughout the QA process at all levels is the evidence provided in Annual Reports from LEPs, Deaneries, Radiology Schools and the RCR. These reports are structured according to the 9 domains of the GMC s generic standards for training: 1. Patient safety 2. Quality management, review and evaluation 3. Equality, diversity and opportunity 4. Recruitment, selection and appointment 5. Delivery of curriculum including assessment 6. Support and development of trainees, trainers and the local faculty 7. Management of education and training 8. Educational resources and capacity 9. Outcomes

Sources of evidence The evidence is available from a number of sources: LEP (Local Education Provider) = Trust or other provider institution LEP radiology department data induction process rotas LEP other data Induction programmes and registers Equality and Diversity Training records Record of approved Trainers within the LEP LEP s Human Resources Data LEP/Deanery study leave policy LEP/Deanery Trainee in Difficulty policy Annual report to Deanery and Action Plan Deanery Quality Management data Records of the National Selection Process Trainee exit questionnaires (currently used in some but not all Deaneries) Annual report to GMC and Action Plan Radiology School Teaching programmes and attendance records Annual Report to Deanery/RCR and Action Plan Trainee progression data o ARCP outcomes o Examination results o Consultant appointments following CCT RCR GMC Other Annual Specialty Report to GMC and Action Plan GMC trainee survey GMC trainer survey Reports of GMC/Deanery visits Reports from other healthcare regulatory bodies eg: Care Quality Commission(CQC), NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) The following checklist of questions, derived from the GMC generic standards for training, is designed to act as a guide for the collection of evidence, and also to where it may be found. It is a guide only and does not imply that all the items on the check list have to be surveyed. There is room for local variation and each scheme should decide, together with their deanery and School, on a core level of data collection and evidence for quality assurance. All domains are also sampled by the GMC trainee survey which should be triangulated against other data.

Checklist In the list below, an indication is given, following each question, of who should hold the data as follows: LEP = Local Education Provider D = Deanery RS = Radiology School RCR = Royal College of Radiologists GMC = General Medical Council O = other health regulatory bodies Domain 1: Patient safety Standards: The responsibilities, related duties, working hours and supervision of trainees must be consistent with the delivery of high quality safe patient care. There must be clear procedures to address immediately any concerns about patient safety arising from the training of doctors Is there comprehensive induction of trainees into each new part of their rotation? LEP Do trainees always know who to contact regarding patient care and are they appropriately supervised at all times? LEP, D Are all those supervising trainees appropriately trained? LEP,D Are trainees obtaining consent appropriately? LEP Are shift and on-call rota patterns designed so as to minimise the adverse effects of sleep deprivation? LEP, D Are there well organised handovers at the start and end of a period of duty? LEP, D Are there robust processes for identifying, supporting and managing trainees whose progress or performance, health, or conduct is giving rise to concern? LEP,D Are robust and transparent processes in place to ensure that any information about trainee doctors that is relevant to their development as doctors is shared with relevant individuals and bodies? LEP, D, RS Domain 2: Quality Management, Review and Evaluation Standard: Training must be quality managed, monitored, reviewed, evaluated and improved. Are quality management processes and associated information systems compliant with the Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information Acts? D Are trainees hours of work compliant with the European Working Time Directive? LEP, D Are local quality management processes in place covering all posts, programmes and trainers? D, RS Does the quality management process take into account the views of all those involved including trainees, local faculty and, where appropriate, patients and employers? D Domain 3: Equality, Diversity and Opportunity Standard: Training must be fair and based on principles of equality. Is information about training programmes, their content and purpose, publicly accessible? LEP, D

Are all reasonable steps taken to facilitate part time/flexible training where appropriate? LEP, D Have necessary adjustments have been made for doctors reporting disability? LEP, D Is relevant Equality and Diversity data from programmes and LEPs available to both trainers and trainees? LEP, D, Have all trainers had equal opportunities/diversity training in the past 3 years? LEP Domain 4: Recruitment, selection and appointment Standard: Processes for recruitment, selection and appointment must be open, fair, and effective. Is information about places on training programmes, eligibility, selection criteria and the application process published and made widely available in sufficient time to doctors who may be eligible to apply? D Are candidates selected through open and fair competition? D Is an appeals process against non-selection written, explicit and easily available? D Are all members of selection panels appropriately trained? D Do all selection panels have a lay member? D Is comprehensive information provided for those within postgraduate programmes about choices in the programme and how they are allocated? D, RS Domain 5: Delivery of approved curriculum including assessment Standard: The requirements set out in the approved curriculum and assessment system must be delivered and assessed. Has the RCR clearly communicated curriculum and assessment requirements to Deaneries, LEPs and Radiology Schools? RCR, RS Is there sufficient practical experience available within the programme to support acquisition of knowledge, skills and behaviours, and demonstration of developing competency as set out in the approved curriculum? RS Does each programme show how, the posts within it taken together, will meet the requirements of the approved curriculum and what must be delivered within each post? RS Are trainees able to access and be free to attend regular, relevant, timetabled, organised educational sessions and training days, courses, resources and other learning opportunities of educational value to the trainee that form an intrinsic part of the training programme, and do they have support to undertake this activity whenever possible? LEP, RS Is the overall purpose of the approved assessment system as well as each of its components documented, in the public domain and implemented. RCR, RS, Are assessments appropriately sequenced and do they match progression through the career pathway? RS Do individual approved assessments within the system add unique information and build on previous assessments? RS Do assessors have appropriate expertise in the areas they are assessing? LEP, D Do all trainees get regular feedback on their performance? LEP, D, RS Do all doctors and other health and social care professionals who work with trainees get the opportunity to provide constructive feedback about a trainee s performance? LEP Do all trainees maintain a comprehensive portfolio as a personal record of educational achievement? LEP, RS

Domain 6: Support and development of trainees, trainers and local faculty Standard: Trainees must be supported to acquire the necessary skills and experience through induction, effective educational and clinical supervision, an appropriate workload, relevant learning opportunities, personal support and time to learn. Induction Are comprehensive induction processes in place; to the LEP, the Radiology department and Radiology School? LEP, RS Is there appropriate educational induction into each post where the educational framework and support systems are discussed and aims and objectives are set? LEP Educational supervision Is the educational supervisor designated and known to the trainee? LEP Are learning agreements signed at the beginning of each post? LEP Are all trainees provided with a learning portfolio or logbook issued as a basis for discussion with their educational supervisor? LEP Are regular meetings held between trainees and their educational supervisor? LEP Are trainees aware of how they can feedback concerns and views about their training and educational experience without prejudice? LEP, D, RS Is there a system in place for reviewing progress of trainees within each post and a process for the transfer of information by supervisors of trainees between posts? LEP, RS Is relevant, up-to-date career advice and support readily available? LEP Training Are work patterns and intensity of work appropriate for learning? LEP,D Are trainees enabled to learn new skills under appropriate supervision? LEP, D Is the length of placements sufficient to allow trainees to become members of the team and allow team members to make reliable judgements about them? RS What safeguards are in place to ensure that trainees do not regularly carry out routine tasks that do not require them to use their medical expertise and knowledge, or have little educational value? D Are trainees involved regularly in clinical audit? LEP, RS Is there access for trainees to Occupational Health and counselling services? LEP, D Is there access to generic skills training e.g. management, clinical governance at all stages of development? LEP, D, RS Are there opportunities to learn with other health professionals? LEP, D, RS Are trainees made aware of anti-bullying policies? LEP, D Is information readily available about less than fulltime training? LEP, D Are trainees made aware of the processes for managing and supporting doctors in difficulty? LEP, D Study leave Are the eligibility and application process for study leave clear, fair and transparent? LEP, D Are trainees made aware of the deanery-level appeals process? LEP, D

Are trainees able to take the maximum study leave permitted in their terms and conditions of service? LEP, D Academic training Are trainees made aware of the academic opportunities available in their programme? RS Is guidance available to trainees who wish to pursue an academic career? RS Are flexible approved programmes, which permit multiple entry and exit points, available for academic trainees? RS, D Trainers Standards: Trainers must provide a level of supervision appropriate to the competence and experience of the trainee. Trainers must be involved in, and contribute to, the learning culture in which patient care occurs. Trainers must be supported in their role by a postgraduate medical education team and have a suitable job plan with an appropriate workload and sufficient time to train, supervise, assess and provide feedback to develop trainees. Trainers must understand the structure and purpose of, and their role in, the training programme of their designated trainees. How are those doctors who undertake specific educational roles selected, trained, supported and developed? LEP, D, RS Domain 7: Management of Education and Training Standard: Education and training must be planned and maintained through transparent processes which show who is responsible at each stage. Is there a management plan with a schedule of responsibilities, accountabilities and defined processes for ensuring the maintenance of GMC standards in the arrangement and content of the training programme? D, RS Is there a director at LEP board level responsible for supporting postgraduate medical training? LEP Is there clear accountability, a description of roles and responsibilities, and adequate resources available to those involved in managing training and education at LEP level? LEP Domain 8: Educational resources and capacity Standard: The educational facilities, infrastructure and leadership must be adequate to deliver the curriculum. Is the educational capacity of the institution adequate to deliver the practical experience required by the curriculum? LEP, D Are there sufficient library and internet facilities available to enable trainees to achieve the specified outcomes of their training programme? LEP, D, RS Is there a suitable ratio of trainers to trainees? LEP, D Do all trainers have adequate time for training identified in their job plans? LEP, D

Are appropriate technology enhanced learning opportunities available and accessible to trainees to improve their clinical and practical skills? Eg simulation, clinical skills laboratories. LEP, D, RS Do trainees have sufficient access to meeting rooms, teaching accommodation and audiovisual aids? LEP, D Domain 9: Outcomes Standard: The impact of the standards must be tracked against trainee outcomes and clear linkages should be made to improving the quality of training and the outcomes of the training programmes. Are organisations which provide postgraduate training able to demonstrate they are collecting and using information about the progression of trainees to improve the quality of training? LEP, D, RS Do trainees have access to analysis of outcomes of assessments and exams for each programme and each location benchmarked against other programmes? RS, D, RCR References: 1. The Trainee Doctor (GMC) 2011 2. Quality Improvement Framework (GMC) 2011