V a l u e B a s e d P u r c h a s i n g S e r i e s The first performance period has ended what now? Presented by: Craig Deao, MHA

Similar documents
Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Value Based Purchasing

CMS in the 21 st Century

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Our Hospital s Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Journey

Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

Facility State National

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Medicare Payment Strategy

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

HCAHPS. Presented by: Bill Sexton. Proudly recognized as one of the Nation s Top 100 Critical Access Hospitals - ivantage Health Analytics

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

Care Coordination What Matters

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Overview of DataGen Analyses Wyoming Hospital Association

FFY 2018 IPPS PROPOSED RULE CHA MEMBER FORUM

Financial Policy & Financial Reporting. Jay Andrews VP of Financial Policy

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

New Mexico Hospital Association

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

Connecting the Revenue and Reimbursement Cycles

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

OVERVIEW OF THE FY 2018 IPPS FINAL RULE. Published in the Federal Register August 14 th Rule to take effect October 1 st

The Data Game. Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ VP Research & Market Insights

P4P Programs 9/13/2013. Medicare P4P Programs. Medicaid P4P Programs

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE AND VALUE BASED PURCHASING: Leigh Humphrey, MBA, LMSW, CPHQ

Is Emergency Department Quality Related to Other Hospital Quality Domains?

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

Person-Centered Care and Population Health

An Update on CMS Quality Programs: Pharmacists can shine in new era of patient outcomes and efficiency!

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

Improving Compliance

How the compliance department can support quality of care initiatives

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Mastering the Mandatory Elements of the Affordable Care Act. Melinda Hancock Walter Coleman

FY 2014 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

WA Flex Program Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Program

Next Generation of Healthcare in the World of ACOs and VBP

An Update on Medicare s Value-based Purchasing and Readmissions Reduction Programs:

System Quality Control and. Peter Shamamian, MD FACS Vice President and Chief Quality Officer Vice Chairman for Quality and Performance Improvement

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Performance Scorecard 2013

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

Presented by: Gara Edelstein, CNO, CHS & St. Catherine of Siena Nicolette Fiore-Lopez, CNO, St. Charles Hospital Susan Penque, CNO, South Nassau

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

CY 2012 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule

2013 Health Care Regulatory Update. January 8, 2013

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Hospital Compare Quality Measure Results for Oregon CAHs: 2015

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM HOSPITAL DASHBOARD

Program Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Final Rule Teleconference September 16, 2014

VALUE. Critical Access Hospital QUALITY REPORTING GUIDE

An Illustration in CLAS Bringing the Cultural and Linguistic Service Standards to Life

To Admit or Not to Admit: How Do We Answer this Question?

Copyright 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Using Predictive and Descriptive Models to Improve Nurse Staff Planning and Scheduling

Troubleshooting Audio

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

SCIP. Surgical Care Improvement Project. Making Surgeries Safer. By: Roshini Mathew, RN

Statement 2: Patients/carers are offered verbal and written information on VTE prevention as part of the admission process.

Managing Healthcare Payment Opportunity Fundamentals CENTER FOR INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION

Transcription:

V a l u e B a s e d P u r c h a s i n g S e r i e s The first performance period has ended what now? Presented by: Craig Deao, MHA

Objectives At the conclusion of this video you will be able to: Discuss where we stand within the Value-Based Purchasing timeline Describe the key changes taking effect for the performance period

W h e r e w e v e b e e n...

Implementation Timeline CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Baseline Period (Jul 2009 Mar 2010 ) Performance Period (Jul 2011 Mar 2012 ) Payments Affected (Oct 2012 Sept 2013 ) We Are Here Incentive Payments Announced

Implementation Timeline CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Baseline Period (Jul 2009 Mar 2010 ) Performance Period (Jul 2011 Mar 2012 ) Payments Affected (Oct 2012 Sept 2013 ) We Are Here Incentive Payments Announced

Value Based Purchasing FY 2013 1% Base operating DRG payments 12 Process of Care Measures (* 70% Weight) HCAHPS (* 30% Weight) Performance attainment and improvement will determine total hospital reimbursement Implementation FY 2013 (October 2012) Source: Value Based Purchasing Program final rule 4.29.11

W h e r e w e r e g o i n g...

Value Based Purchasing FY New update 1.25% Base operating DRG payments Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11 Process of Care Measures (45% Weight) HCAHPS Composites (30% Weight) Outcomes (25% Weight) Performance attainment and improvement will determine total hospital reimbursement

VBP Reimbursement Periods New update CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Process of Care & HCAHPS Baseline Period (Apr-Dec 2010) Process of Care & HCAHPS Performance Period (Apr-Dec 2012) CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Outcomes Baseline Period (Jul 2009 Jun 2010) Outcomes Performance Period (Jul 2011 Jun 2012)

Proposed vs. Final Rule New update Eliminated the Efficiency Domain Finalized the Outcomes Domain and associated measures Eliminated the composite scores for Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs) and AHRQ Measures (initially part of Outcomes Domain) Addition of Core Process Measure: Postoperative Urinary Catheter Removal on Postoperative Day 1 or 2 (SCIP-Inf-9) Finalized domain weighting Released new floor, threshold and benchmark numbers for the performance periods Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11

Patient Experience of Care Domain (HCAHPS) New update Green = increased threshold from 2013 Red = decreased threshold from 2013 Floor 2013 National Threshold National Threshold 2013 National Benchmark National Benchmark Communication with Nurses 42.84% 75.18% 75.79% 84.70% 84.99% Communication with Doctors 55.49% 79.42% 79.57% 88.95% 88.45% Responsiveness of Hospital Staff 32.15% 61.82% 62.21% 77.69% 78.08% Pain Management 40.79% 68.75% 68.99% 77.90% 77.92% Communication about Medicines 36.01% 59.28% 59.85% 70.42% 71.54% Hospital Cleanliness & Quietness 38.52% 62.80% 63.54% 77.64% 78.10% Discharge Information 54.73% 81.93% 82.72% 89.09% 89.24% Overall Rating of Hospital 30.91% 66.02% 67.33% 82.52% 82.55% Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11

Achievement Improvement Consistency HCAHPS Scoring New update Achievement Improvement Consistency Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11 The greater of the two scores will be used for each composite Based on achievement performance in ALL composites or lowest index composite will be used

Final Rule Process of Care Measures New update Measure ID Measure Green = increased threshold from 2013 Red = decreased threshold from 2013 2013 National Threshold National Threshold 2013 National Benchmark National Benchmark AMI 7a AMI 8a Fibrinolytic Therapy Received Within 30 Minutes of Hospital Arrival Primary PCI Received Within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival 0.6548 0.8066 0.9191 0.9630 0.9186 0.9344 1.0000 1.0000 HF 1 Discharge Instructions 0.9077 0.9266 1.0000 1.0000 PN 3b PN 6 Blood Cultures Performed in the Emergency Department Prior to Initial Anti-biotic Received in Hospital Initial Antibiotic Selection for CAP in Immunocompetent Patient 0.9643 0.9730 1.0000 1.0000 0.9277 0.9446 0.9958 1.0000 Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11

Final Rule Process of Care Measures New update Measure ID Measure Green = increased threshold from 2013 Red = decreased threshold from 2013 2013 National Threshold National Threshold 2013 National Benchmark National Benchmark SCIP Inf 1 SCIP Inf 2 SCIP Inf 3 SCIP Inf 4 NEW SCIP Inf 9 Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11 Prophylactic Antibiotic Received Within One Hour Prior to Surgical Incision Prophylactic Antibiotic Selection for Surgical Patients Prophylactic Antibiotics Discontinued Within 24 Hours After Surgery End Time Cardiac Surgery Patients with Controlled 6AM Postoperative Serum Glucose Postoperative Urinary Catheter Removal on Post Operative Day 1 or 2 0.9735 0.9807 0.9998 1.0000 0.9766 0.9813 1.0000 1.0000 0.9507 0.9663 0.9968 0.9996 0.9428 0.9634 0.9963 1.0000 N/A 0.9286 N/A 0.9989

Final Rule Process of Care Measures New update Measure ID Measure Green = increased threshold from 2013 Red = decreased threshold from 2013 2013 National Threshold National Threshold 2013 National Benchmark National Benchmark SCIP Card 2 SCIP VTE 1 SCIP VTE 2 Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11 Surgery Patients on a Beta Blocker Prior to Arrival That Received a Beta Blocker During the Perioperative Period Surgery Patients with Recommended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Ordered Surgery Patients Who Received Appropriate Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Within 24 Hours Prior to Surgery to 24 Hours After Surgery 0.9500 0.9565 1.0000 1.0000 0.9307 0.9462 0.9985 1.0000 0.9399 0.9492 1.0000 0.9983

Outcome Measures New update Measure ID Measure National Threshold National Benchmark MORT 30 AMI Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30- Day Mortality Rate (shown as survival rate) 0.8477 0.8673 MORT 30 HF Heart Failure (HF) 30-Day Mortality Rate (shown as survival rate) 0.8861 0.9042 MORT 30 PN Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Mortality Rate (shown as survival rate) 0.8818 0.9021 Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11

HCAHPS & Mortality [W]hen we controlled for a hospital s clinical performance, higher hospital-level patient satisfaction scores were independently associated with lower hospital inpatient mortality rates. Source: Glickman SW et al, Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Clinical Quality and Inpatient Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:188-195.

Achievement Improvement Process of Care & Outcomes Scoring New update Achievement Improvement The greater of the two scores will be used for each Core Measure Note: Implementation FY Source: OPPS VBP Final rule 11.1.11

More in Store 1% 1.25% 1. 5% 1. 75% 2% 1% 2% 3% 3% 3%

HCAHPS & Readmissions For all three clinical areas (AMI, HF, PN),HCAHPS performance was more predictive of readmission rates than the objective clinical performance measures often used to assess the quality of hospital care. Source: Boulding W et al. Relationship between Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Care and Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days, Am J Manag Care. 2011; 17(1): 41-48.