Panel Discussion: Rising Issues in Human Systems

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

Anti-Ship Missile Defense

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Unmanned Systems Interoperability Conference 2011 Integration of Autonomous UxS into USN Experiments

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

AVW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

Tactical Technology Office

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

DRAFT vea Target: 15 min, simultaneous translation Littoral OpTech East VADM Aucoin Keynote Address 1 Dec 2015 Grand Hotel Ichigaya

Status of Unmanned Systems: EXECUTING!

Technological Advances in TDL Training. Mike Smith - BAE Systems AeI

First Announcement/Call For Papers

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #94

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element P857: Joint Deployable Analysis Team (JDAT)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Oceans In Action Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited

Experimenting into the future Mr Ed Gough Deputy Commander Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

Sea Air Space Symposium

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #71

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

WARFIGHTER MODELING, SIMULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION SUPPORT (WMSA&IS)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Department of the Navy (DON) Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) Strategic Priorities

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract October 2009

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

The Verification for Mission Planning System

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

MSSE CAPSTONE REVIEW

Radar Open Systems Architectures

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A

resource allocation decisions.

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

Human Systems Integration (HSI)

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element S750: Mission Training and Preparation Systems FY 2015

Adaptable Autonomous Systems. Dr. Jason Stack

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Unmanned Combat Air Veh(UCAV) Adv Cp/Proto Dev. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Air Defense System Solutions.

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Transcription:

Panel Discussion: Rising Issues in Human Systems NDIA Human Systems Conference February 11, 2015 John Tangney, ONR/341 John.F.Tangney@Navy.Mil

NEW IDEA: Design to Mission Need Mission Effectiveness Estimates Realistic Mission Training Simulations Lightweight, so Flexible Mission Success Metrics performance metrics support Calibrated Using Experts in the Loop Integrated, Joint, Coalition Enable Exploration of Large Design Space Hardware, Software, Human Elements baseline and notional Broadly Available to Industry e.g. Networked PCs Flexible i.e. Modest Fidelity Gain Confidence in Capability Based Assessments Operator CONOPS and TTPs Trade Space Analyses within Mission Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 2

Synthetic Environments for Assessment Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 3 Acquisition Training Operations Synthetic Environments SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Platform KPPs Hardware Sub-systems Human View Software, Automation CONOPS TTPs Bottom Line: SEAs Implement Top-Down Value Estimation

Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 4 The Design Space For many domains of interest, requirements shift too fast for the conventional research, design, build, test cycle of acquisition What is the impact of new capability x on mission, training, team performance, etc? Given new mission profile y, what new capabilities are required for team to meet effectiveness standards? What are improved CONOPS and TTPs? This is what Simulation Based Acquisition hasn t solved but Synthetic Environments for Assessment offer hope SEA allows interoperable models to be reconfigured in infinitely many ways to test hypotheses about effectiveness SEA is not a system that you plug models into (like SAF) SEA facilitates validated collections of models that provide calibrated simulations for testing new ideas and concepts.

Proposed Criteria for SEA Simulation in Form, but Fidelity Traded for Flexible Experimental Use Support Multiple Task Scenarios within the Environment, functionally equivalent to Operational Tasks Scenarios linked to Naval Mission Effectiveness Metrics Calibrated Metrics Using Naval Operators Distributed to Broad Science and Technology Community Enable an Engineering Approach to Unified System Design, Training, and Operation. Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 5

Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 6 Fleet Integrated Testing, Experimentation, and Planning Description: Technologies for High Fidelity, Multi-mission, Integrated Distributed Training and Experimentation. Realistic Synthetic Entities, Environment, and Mission Scenarios High Fidelity Integrated Mission Training Facility, Ford Island HI Models and Analysis of A2AD Tactical Behaviors Naval Need: Ability to Train to System-of-Systems Missions Fully Automated, Realistic Synthetic Forces (LVC) Carrier Air Wing Mission Rehearsal (LVC) Automated Scenario Generation (UAS Training) Realistic Synthetic Environments EW (EDUCAT2E) Missions: FAC/FIAC, ASW, ASuW, MIW, NIFC-CA, EW, A2AD, OTH-Strike FY14 Accomplishments: NIFC-CA entity behaviors to a Navy Common Training System (NGTS) FIST2FAC bi-coastal FST demo (PACFLT and LANTFLT) of synthetic A2AD event LVC Training Event Virtual Air ASW Platform Instrumented Underwater Range Tracking and Acoustic Information Impact: Enhanced Fleet Readiness and Resilience Synthetic Environment for Assessment of CONOPs, TTPs, and potential ROI on weapon system acquisitions

Networked Fleet Integrated Synthetic Training/Testing Facility Systems NCTE Operational Node NCTE RDT&E Node Communications Suite JSAF GCCS DREN/SDREN Academia and S&T Community FIST2FAC ONR NRL Live Training Event Virtual Air ASW Platform Defense Research & Engineering Network JTEN Joint train & experiment NW Partner Nations Japan S. Korea Singapore Instrumented Underwater Tracking and Acoustic Information Research & Development Data Repository Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 7

Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 8 SEA for Acquisition Acquisition The smart buyer problem: How to select design elements for leap-ahead capability improvements without buying everything of value? Platform Personnel Training Interface Automation Sensors Communication Computation Is there some metric applicable to all technology disciplines?

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Interface, Selection, and Training Technologies (U-ASISTT) FY14 EC Three Products Interface Designs Training Create a Synthetic Environment with realistic mission scenarios for: Building calibrated Mission System Trainer Evaluating various interface designs Testing Operator Candidates TTA with Common Control System (PMA-281) Design Personnel Selection & Assignment Deliver selection test components for Navy unmanned aviation operators Identify skills unique to UAS operators Understand training trade-offs Implication of different missions & operators (officer vs enlisted) TTA with NAMI for Integration into ASTB Selection Training: Automated entities & Scenarios Realistic: Deliver computer generated forces & scenarios built from raw data Mission Scale: Rapid generation of large numbers of synthetic entities and realistic mission relevant scenarios TTA with Next Generation Threat System (PMA-205) & UCLASS Integrated Design, Select, and Train for Mission Effectiveness with UASs Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 9

DoD Priority Steering Council Training Technology End States 100 Mission Effectiveness (% Current) 0 3 5 - Seamless Virtual/Constructive training - C2 with tactical players - Quantified human system performance with mission effectiveness metrics - Safe, live virtual constructive training - Individual adaptive team training - Increased Complexity - Increased players 3 Years 5 7 10 10+ - Timely and effective training reflecting dynamic operational insights/challenges - Personalized, adaptable, point of need training - Integrated regional ally mission preparation - Credible synthetic players: persistent, generative, robust - Continuous, real time, high fidelity training with LVC multinational partnering when and where needed Speed to Train for Full Mission Effectiveness 7 10 10+ Hours Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 10

Hybrid Force Warfighters and Autonomous Systems Working as Teams Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 11 Objective: machine intelligence for autonomous systems peer-to-peer human-machine interaction, and high levels of autonomous behavior in highly dynamic and complex battlespaces. SAFFIR Ship-board Autonomous Fire-FIghting Robot Humanoid Shipboard Robotics Firefighting First responder Inspection & maintenance Computational Cognitive Science Cognitive architectures Natural language dialogue Social Cognition Future Impact Minimally supervised, easily taskable autonomous vehicles, robots & systems Cognitively-compatible control interfaces

Synthetic Environments for Assessment Distribution statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 12 Acquisition Training Operations Synthetic Environments SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Platform KPPs Hardware Sub-systems Human View Software, Automation CONOPS TTPs Bottom Line: SEAs Implement Top-Down Value Estimation