Modification NPRM EHR Incentive Program and Meaningful Use

Similar documents
Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

during the EHR reporting period.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

The History of Meaningful Use

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

EHR/Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

2015 MU Reporting Overview of Requirements/Tasks

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians February 2013

MEANINGFUL USE FOR THE OB/GYN. Steven L. Zielke, MD 6/13/2014

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use May, 2012

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Meaningful Use. UERMMMC Medical Alumni Association Meeting July 17, David Nilasena, M.D., Chief Medical Officer CMS Region VI

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Note: Every encounter type must have at least one value designated under the MU Details frame.

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians Offices March 2014

MEANINGFUL USE BASICS

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Transcription:

2015 2017 Modification NPRM EHR Incentive Program and Meaningful Use 2015 Meaningful Use DeeAnne McCallin, MU Program Director 09/09/2015 update

Disclaimer The information included in this presentation is for informational purposes only The CMS proposed rule reviewed in this deck may be viewed at https://s3.amazonaws.com/publicinspection.federalregister.gov/2015-08514.pdf A fact sheet about the NPRM is also available at http://www.cms.gov/newsroom/mediareleasedatabase/factsheets/2015-fact-sheets-items/2015-04-10.html

Show of hands Informal Survey How many scheduled for Stage 2 in 2015? How many scheduled for Stage 1 2015 (first or second year of Stage 1)? How many are scheduled for AIU 2015? NOTE: The last year to begin CA Medicaid EHR Incentive Program is 2016!

Stage 2 (& even S1) in 2015 Complete your upgrade to 2014 CEHRT are you fully implemented and updated? Coordinate with your EHR Vendor & Registries regarding your Public Health reporting Implement patient portal Review monthly Meaningful Use reports, assess for gaps, corrections needed in workflow, identify successes, etc.

The 2015 2017 Proposed Modifications Comments were due to CMS June 14, 2015

Abbreviated Summary of the Mod NPRM for 2015 NPRM = Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed 2015 changed to a 90-day period for all EPs Proposed modification of the patient action measures in Stage 2 objectives related to patient engagement (effects EPs scheduled for Stage 1 in 2015 as well) Streamlines the program by removing reporting requirements on measures which have become redundant, duplicative, or topped out

Timeline Known and Anticipated Friday April 10, 2015 NPRM Released Wed April 15, 2015 NPRM published in Federal Register 60 day comment period comments due June 14, 2015 CMS quiet period review of comments Sept. 3, 2015 CMS submitted to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review* Final Ruling could be 9/3/15 + 90 + 30 days No sooner than Jan. 2016 for Medicare attestations, CA SLR availability TBD * Combined S3 and 2015 CEHRT NPRMs

The Stages are merging together

The Proposed 2015 2017 Measures Measures Public Health CQMs 1. CPOE 2. erx 3. CDS 4. VDT* (elec axs) 5. SRA (protect) 6. Education 7. Med Recon 8. Sum of Care* 9. Secure Msg* If scheduled for Stage 1 in 2015 then must meet 1 of 5 Otherwise, must meet 2 of 5 CMS proposed that Iz Registry be bidirectional 2014 CQMs Report on 9 from 3 Domains * There are proposed changes to the measures These measures apply no matter whether your EP is Stage 1 or Stage 2 in 2015+!!!

NPRM TABLE 4: CURRENT STAGE STRUCTURE, RETAINED OBJECTIVES, AND PROPOSED STRUCTURE

NPRM TABLE 2: STAGE OF MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA BY FIRST YEAR NPRM: *The Modifications to Stage 2 proposed in this rule include alternate exclusions and specifications for certain objectives and measures for providers that were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 of meaningful use in 2015.

Clear as mud, right?!?! Best Mud Run Ever! May 30, 2015 near Stockton, CA

The Removed Measures due to redundant, duplicative or 1. Drug Formularies* 2. Demographics* 3. Problem List* 4. Medication List* 5. Med Allergy List* 6. Vitals* 7. Smoking Status* 8. Clinical Summary topped out 9. Sum of Care (M1&M2) 10.Lab Results* 11.Patient List 12.Reminders 13.Electronic Notes 14.Imaging Results* 15.Family Health History * Incorporated into another active measure (see slide 27)

NPRM TABLE 3: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES IDENTIFIED BY PROVIDER TYPE WHICH ARE REDUNDANT, DUPLICATIVE OR TOPPED OUT

NPRM TABLE 3: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES IDENTIFIED BY PROVIDER TYPE WHICH ARE REDUNDANT, DUPLICATIVE OR TOPPED OUT (continued)

Confused? (You re not alone) In this proposed rule, we (CMS) are seeking to make changes to the requirements for Stage 1 and Stage 2 of meaningful use for 2015 through 2017 to align with the approach for Stage 3 of meaningful use in 2017 and subsequent years.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 An EP s Medi-Cal EHR Program Timeline one possible scenario (EP scheduled for 2015 Stage 2 Year 1) Program Year 1 n/a - skipped Program Year 2 Program Year 3 Program Year 4 Program Year 5 Program Year 6 AIU n/a - skipped MUS1Yr1 MUS1Yr2 FLEX* Modification MU** Modification MU Elective Stage 3 * Flexed to 2013 Stage 1 Definition ** 2015 scheduled for Stage 2

2015 Modification Scenario #1 (EP scheduled for Stage 2) Year 4 2015 Scheduled for Stage 2 Modification MU 90 Day reporting period Not eligible for Alternate Exclusions Cannot submit attestation until 2016 o CA SLR availability TBD probably April 2016 o 9 Core Measures o 2 Public Health Measures (out of 5) o 9 2014 CQMs from 3 Domains Year 5 2016 Modification MU, Full Year reporting period (January, 1 2016 December 31, 2016) Year 6 2017 Modification MU - Stage 3 attestation optional

2015 Modification Scenario #1 Details Measures for EPs Scheduled for 2015 Stage 2 1. CPOE Measure 1 Medication Orders > 60% Measure 2 Lab Orders > 30% Measure 3 Radiology > 30% 2. Electronic Prescribing Greater than 50% Incorporates drug formulary check 3. Clinical Decision Support Measure 1 Implement 5 CDS Measure 2 DrugDrug and Drug Allergy interaction checks

2015 Modification Scenario #1 Details Measures for EPs Scheduled for 2015 Stage 2 4. Patient Electronic Access VDT Measure 1 >= 50% online access made available Measure 2 now only at least 1 patient to meet this measure (not 5%!); must view, download or transmits his or her health information to a third party 5. Protect Electronic Health Information (SRA) 6. Patient Specific Education provided for > 10% 7. Medication Reconciliation performed for > 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP

2015 Modification Scenario #1 Details Measures for EPs Scheduled for 2015 Stage 2 8. Summary of Care (has list of required elements) Former Measure 1 deleted/removed (50% provided) Former Measure 2 for > 10% of transitioned or referred patients (to another setting) a provider would be required to simply create the summary of care record using CEHRT and transmit the summary of care record electronically (does not require receipt of record) Former Measure 3 deleted/removed ( Test EHR ) 9. Secure Messaging now a Yes/No measure (Yes to pass) Capability for patients to send and receive a secure electronic message with the EP was fully enabled

2015 Modification Scenario #1 Details Measures for EPs Scheduled for 2015 Stage 2 Public Heath Requirement Must meet 2 of 5 Measure Option 1 Immunization Registry Reporting Measure Option 2 Syndromic Surveillance Reporting Measure Option 3 Case Reporting (page 93 of NPRM) Measure Option 4 Public Health Registry Reporting (like previous specialized registry, cancer counts, pg 95 of NPRM) Measure Option 5 Clinical Data Registry Reporting (page 97 of NPRM; reporting to other non-ph entities not LDH) Clinical Quality Measures 2014 CQMs 9 out of 64 (ideally with denominator > 0) Must be from 3 National Domains

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 An EP s Medi-Cal EHR Program Timeline a 2 nd possible scenario (EP scheduled for 2015 Stage 1 Yr 2) Program Year 1 n/a - skipped Program Year 2 Program Year 3 Program Year 4 Program Year 5 Program Year 6 AIU n/a - skipped MUS1Yr1 FLEX Modification MU * Modification MU Modification MU Stage 3 * Alternate Exclusions available for EPs scheduled for Stage 1 in 2015 * 2015 scheduled for Stage 1

2015 Modification Scenario #2 Alternate Exclusion Options (EP scheduled for 2015 Stage 1) 1. CPOE Measure 1 Medication Orders > 30% (alternate measure) Measure 2 Lab Orders may exclude ( alternate excl.) Measure 3 Radiology may exclude ( alternate excl.) 2. Electronic Prescribing Greater than 40% 3. Clinical Decision Support Implement 1 CDS Alternate Measures and Alternate Exclusions applicable in 2015 only for EPs scheduled for Stage 1; this scenario only flags CPOE alternate information but Alts are applicable thru the measures 4. Patient Electronic Access VDT Measure 1 >= 50% online access made available Measure 2 (1 patient or former 5%) may exclude

2015 Modification Scenario #2 Alternate Exclusion Options (EP scheduled for 2015 Stage 1) 5. Protect Electronic Health Information (SRA) 6. Patient Specific Education may exclude 7. Medication Reconciliation may exclude 8. Summary of Care may exclude 9. Secure Messaging may exclude Public Heath Requirement Must meet 1 of 5 (see slide 15) Clinical Quality Measures 2014 CQMs 9 out of 64 (ideally with denominator > 0) Must be from 3 National Domains

An EP s Medi-Cal EHR Program Timeline a 3 rd possible scenario (EP scheduled for 2015 Stage 2 Yr 2) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Program Year 1 Program Year 2 Program Year 3 Program Year 4 Program Year 5 Program Year 6 AIU MUS1Yr1 MUS1Yr2 MUS2Yr1 (no Flex) Modification MU Modification MU

Stay with me, I know

Patient Electronic Access VDT Measure unless the information is not available in certified EHR technology (CEHRT), is restricted from disclosure due to any federal, state or local law regarding the privacy of a person s health information, including variations due to the age of the patient or the provider believes that substantial harm may arise from disclosing particular health information in this manner. See 5 Page Stage 2 VDT Measure Specification Sheet: http://www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_EPCore_7_PatientEle ctronicaccess.pdf

Transition of Care: Summary of Care Record The Mod NPRM simplifies measure 2 Proposed Measure2: The EP, eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care that -- (1) uses CEHRT to create a summary of care record; and (2) electronically transmits such summary to a receiving provider for more than 10 percent of transitions of care and referrals. The proposed updates to this measure reflect stakeholder input regarding operational challenges in meeting this measure, and seek to increase flexibility for providers while continuing to drive interoperability across care settings and encouraging further innovation.

Elements Required for VDT and Sum of Care Data Element Patient Electronic Access - VDT (To the patient!) Summary of Care (To another provider!) Patient name X X Referring or transitioning provider's name and office contact information (EP only) X X Current And Past Problem List X Past list at EP's discretion Procedures X X Encounter diagnosis not required X

Elements Required for VDT and Sum of Care Data Element Patient Electronic Access - VDT (To the patient!) Summary of Care (To another provider!) Immunizations not required X Laboratory test results X X Vital signs (height, weight, blood pressure, BMI) X (plus growth charts) X Smoking status X X Functional status, including activities of daily living, cognitive and disability status not required X

Elements Required for VDT and Sum of Care Data Element Patient Electronic Access - VDT (To the patient!) Summary of Care (To another provider!) Demographic information (preferred language, sex, race, ethnicity, date of birth) X X Care plan field, including goals and instructions X X Care team including the primary care provider of record and any addl known care team members beyond the referring or transitioning provider and the receiving provider X X

Elements Required for VDT and Sum of Care Data Element Patient Electronic Access - VDT (To the patient!) Summary of Care (To another provider!) Reason for referral not required X Current medication list X X Medication list history X not required Current medication allergy list X X Medication allergy list history X not required

Mod NPRM Public Health Measures is in active engagement with a public health agency... Measure Option 1 Immunization Registry Reporting: to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization Registry Measure Option 2 Syndromic Surveillance Reporting: to submit syndromic surveillance data from a non-urgent care ambulatory setting Measure Option 3 Case Reporting: to submit case reporting of reportable conditions Measure Option 4 Public Health Registry Reporting: to submit data to public health registries Measure Option 5 Clinical Data Registry Reporting: to submit data to a clinical data registry.

Payment Adjustments if eligible for the Medicare EHR Incentive program (even if you participate in the Medicaid EHRIP), you are subject to Payment Adjustments if not a meaningful user Does your organization submit any claims for Medicare Part B Reimbursements that are billed at the individual NPI level (not facility level billing)? If so, and if an MD, DO, DDS, you are probably subject to payment adjustments Hardship waiver applications are due each year by July 1 st, looking back at previous CY to avoid following CY penalty

2015 Summary The NPRM covers more than what has been included in these 20+ slides (read the rule) How does this NPRM affect your IT, clinical work flow plans and/or MU reporting period for 2015? Does this NPRM affect your EHR Vendor, their reporting, their versions? Expect slow CA SLR adoption of the Modifications programming changes to the attestation system will take a while

Fewer exclusions and think about 2016 More alignment across your EPs Full year reporting be ready on Jan 1 st! Do Gap Analysis throughout the year Last year to begin in CA Medicaid Incentives

QUESTIONS? CalHIPSO REC: deeanne@calhipso.org 510-302-3364 www.calhipso.org