The 1033 Program, Department of Defense Support to Law Enforcement

Similar documents
Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Report Documentation Page

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Wildland Fire Assistance

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (SEC. 933)

Law Enforcement Support Office

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

DON Mentor-Protégé Program

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Evaluation of the Defense Criminal Investigative Organizations Compliance with the Lautenberg Amendment Requirements and Implementing Guidance

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Securing America s Borders: The Role of the Military

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Securing America s Borders: The Role of the Military

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

INSIDER THREATS. DOD Should Strengthen Management and Guidance to Protect Classified Information and Systems

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Acquisition. Diamond Jewelry Procurement Practices at the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (D ) June 4, 2003

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Streamlining U.S. Army Military Installation Map (MIM) Production

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

Director of National Intelligence Statutory Authorities: Status and Proposals

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Report No. D August 12, Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Could be Improved

Report Documentation Page

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

DoD IG Report to Congress on Section 357 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Internal Controls Over the Department of the Navy Cash and Other Monetary Assets Held in the Continental United States

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

(132nd General Assembly) (Amended Senate Bill Number 37) AN ACT

Review of Defense Contract Management Agency Support of the C-130J Aircraft Program

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES

Financial Management

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Report No. D September 25, Controls Over Information Contained in BlackBerry Devices Used Within DoD

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

Information Technology

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Report No. D June 17, Long-term Travel Related to the Defense Comptrollership Program

Transcription:

The 1033 Program, Department of Defense Support to Law Enforcement Daniel H. Else Specialist in National Defense August 28, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43701

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 28 AUG 2014 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2014 to 00-00-2014 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The 1033 Program, Department of Defense Support to Law Enforcement 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Congressional Research Service,The Library of Congress,101 Independence Ave, SE,Washington,DC,20540 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Summary The United States has traditionally kept military action and civil law enforcement apart, codifying that separation in the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. On the other hand, Congress has occasionally authorized the Department of Defense (DOD) to undertake actions specifically intended to enhance the effectiveness of domestic law enforcement through direct or material support. One such effort is the so-called 1033 Program, named for the section of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 1997 that granted permanent authority to the Secretary of Defense to transfer defense material to federal and state agencies for use in law enforcement, particularly those associated with counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities. The 1997 act was preceded by 1988 legislation that expanded DOD s role in the interdiction of illicit drug trafficking. That was soon followed by temporary authority to transfer excess defense material, including small arms and ammunition, from excess DOD stocks to law enforcement agencies for use in counter-drug activities. This could be done at no cost to the receiving agency. The 1997 NDAA expanded that authority to include counter-terrorism activities and made it permanent. It is codified as 10 U.S.C. 2576a. The 1033 Program is administered by the Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). Under it, local and state law enforcement agencies may apply to DLA to participate. DLA requires the governor of the state to execute a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and appoint a state 1033 Program coordinator, who is responsible for ensuring that the program is properly administered within the state and that appropriate property records are maintained. Approved agencies may request material from DLA through their state coordinators. The LESO retains final approval authority over the types and quantities of material transferred from DOD excess stocks to the agencies. Any material requiring demilitarization before being released to the public must be returned to DLA when no longer needed by the receiving law enforcement agency. LESO states that 11,000 agencies nationwide are currently registered and that 8,000 of them use material provided through the 1033 Program. Congressional Research Service

Contents Department of Defense Support to Law Enforcement... 1 The 1033 Program... 2 Materials Offered to Law Enforcement Agencies through the 1033 Program... 2 Program Participants... 3 Material Accountability... 3 Congressional Reporting Requirements... 4 Additional Information Resources... 4 Appendixes Appendix A. Text of Section 1208 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 1990 (P.L. 101-189)... 5 Appendix B. Text of 10 U.S.C. 2576a, Excess Personal Property: Sale or Donation For Law Enforcement Activities... 6 Contacts Author Contact Information... 7 Congressional Research Service

Department of Defense Support to Law Enforcement American tradition has long maintained a distinct separation between military force and civil law enforcement. Nevertheless, federal troops were commonly used to enforce civil law during the years immediately after the Civil War, particularly in the states of the former Confederacy. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (18 U.S.C. 1385) was written to ensure that this practice would come to an end. 1 Though the act codified an American tradition of separating military from civilian affairs, Congress has occasionally authorized the President to deploy military force to enforce, or assist in the enforcement, of various laws. For example, Congress has vested the Coast Guard, a federal armed force, with a broad range of law enforcement responsibilities. Congress has also passed statutes enabling the employment of military force in law enforcement support under specific circumstances, such as permitting the President to call out the armed forces in times of insurrection and domestic violence, 2 or authorizing the armed forces to share information and equipment with civilian law enforcement agencies. 3 One important example of congressional direction in the use of the armed forces to support law enforcement was seen in the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1989. 4 Title XI of the act tasked the Department of Defense (DOD) to assume a prominent role in detecting and monitoring illegal drug production and trafficking. DOD became the single lead agency of the Federal Government for the detection and monitoring of aerial and maritime transit of illegal drugs into the United States, and the integrator of an effective system of command, control, communications, and intelligence assets dedicated to drug interdiction. 5 The act also placed Coast Guard law enforcement detachments aboard every appropriate surface naval vessel at sea in a drug-interdiction area and made available any equipment (including associated supplies or spare parts), base facility, or research facility of the Department of Defense to any Federal, State or local law enforcement official for law enforcement purposes. 6 Finally, it authorized additional DOD funding to the National Guard for drug interdiction and enforcement operations. 7 The following year, in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991, Congress created a pathway for DOD to directly transfer to federal and state agencies equipment (so-called personal property ) that was excess to the needs of the department and suitable for use 1 Posse comitatus refers to the customary English authority of a sheriff to summon the population of his county to his assistance to, for example, keep the peace or arrest felons. The act forbids the willful use of any part of the Army (later expanded to include the Air Force) as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws. 2 See 10 U.S.C. 331-335. 3 See 10 U.S.C. 371-382. For more information regarding the background and scope of the Posse Comitatus Act, see CRS Report R42659, The Posse Comitatus Act and Related Matters: The Use of the Military to Execute Civilian Law, by Charles Doyle and Jennifer K. Elsea. 4 Act of September 29, 1988, P.L. 100-456, 102 Stat. 1918. 5 Ibid., Section 1102 and Section 1103. 6 Ibid., Section 1104. 7 Ibid., Section 1105. Congressional Research Service 1

in counter-drug activities. 8 Under Section 1208, the Secretary of Defense could transfer defense equipment, including small arms and ammunition, from existing defense stocks without cost to the receiving agency. In transferring such property, the Secretary of Defense was required to consult with the Attorney General and the Director of National Drug Control Policy (the federal government s so-called drug czar ). 9 The act included a sunset provision that would have terminated this authority on September 30, 1992. This termination date was extended to September 30, 1997 by the enactment of Section 1044 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993. 10 The 1033 Program As the revised termination date approached, the 104 th Congress considered making its authority permanent. The House version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 contained language (H.R. 3230, Section 103) that would have expanded eligibility for property transfers to all law enforcement while retaining a priority for counter-narcotics activities. The Senate s amendment of the bill contained no similar provision. In conference, the Senate receded, but with an amendment that extended priority in property transfer to both counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism activity. The amendment also ensured that DOD would incur no cost beyond management of the program in transferring this excess equipment to these law enforcement agencies. The language was enacted as Section 1033 and is codified under Title 10, Section 2576a, of the United States Code (10 U.S.C. 2576a). 11 Materials Offered to Law Enforcement Agencies through the 1033 Program The program is administered by the Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), located at DLA Disposition Services Headquarters in Battle Creek, Michigan. Though participating agencies initiate requests for material, the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) retains the final authority to determine the type, quantity, and location of excess military property suitable for transfer and use in law enforcement activities. General categories of equipment offered for transfer include office furniture, household goods (e.g., kitchen equipment), exercise equipment, portable electric generators, tents, and general law enforcement supplies (e.g., handcuffs, riot shields, holsters, binoculars, and digital cameras). Heavy equipment, such as cranes, and various types of land vehicles are available. Watercraft, aircraft, and weapons are also eligible for transfer. Miscellaneous other property includes tool 8 See Section 1208 of Title XII in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (P.L. 101-189, 103 Stat. 1566) at Appendix A. Personal property includes any belongings that are not real estate property, buildings, or other fixed infrastructure. The section was codified as 10 U.S.C. 372 note. 9 The position of Director of National Drug Control Policy had been created by the 100th Congress as part of the 1988 omnibus drug bill, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (H.R. 5210, P.L. 100-690), and President George H.W. Bush appointed William T. Bennett to the position. 10 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (H.R. 5006, P.L. 102-484). 11 This was Section 1033(a)(1) in Division A, Title X, Subtitle B of the National Defense Authorization Act for 1997 (P.L. 104-201, 110 Stat. 2639). It was enacted on September 23, 1996. Congressional Research Service 2

kits, first aid kits, blankets and bedding, lawn maintenance supplies, combat boots, and office equipment (computers, printers, fax machines, etc.). Program Participants Law enforcement agencies wishing to take part in the 1033 Program apply to the LESO through their state s 1033 Program coordinator (see below). Once their participation has been approved by the state coordinator and the LESO, the law enforcement agencies appoint officials to visit their local DLA Disposition Services Site, where they screen property and place requests for specific items. The forms are then forwarded to the state coordinator for review; once approved, the LESO makes the final determination of whether or not the property will be transferred. Law enforcement agencies that receive approval for property transfers must cover all transportation costs. According to the LESO, 11,000 law enforcement agencies are registered nationwide and 8,000 are currently using property provided through the program. 12 Material Accountability Each state participating in the program must set up a business relationship with DLA through the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). Each participating state s governor is required to appoint a state coordinator to ensure that the program is used correctly by the participating law enforcement agencies. The state coordinators are expected to keep property accountability records, investigate any alleged misuse of property, and, in certain cases, report violations of the MOA to DLA. The LESO may suspend the participation of a state that cannot properly account for the property entrusted to it, and state coordinators may suspend the participation of any law enforcement agency thought to abuse the program. The chief of police or equivalent senior official of the receiving law enforcement organization is held responsible for all 1033 Program controlled property. Additionally, DLA has a compliance review program. The program s objective is to have the Law Enforcement Support program staff visit each state coordinator and assist him or her in ensuring that property accountability records are properly maintained, minimizing the potential for fraud, waste and abuse. Some of the equipment offered to law enforcement through the program, such as weapons or tactical vehicles, possesses significant military capabilities. By law, these items cannot be released to the general public and ownership is never transferred to law enforcement agencies rather, they are considered to be on loan. This equipment is closely tracked by both the LESO and the relevant state coordinator and it must be returned to a DLA Disposition Services Site when no longer needed for law enforcement purposes. Property not considered to be uniquely military, such as office equipment or first aid kits, is considered controlled property for the first year that it is held by the agency and must be 12 See DLA Disposition Services website. The LESO defines a law enforcement agency as a government agency whose primary function is the enforcement of applicable federal, state and local laws and whose compensated law enforcement officers have the powers of arrest and apprehension. Congressional Research Service 3

accounted for in the same manner as all other 1033 Program property. At the end of the year, title is transferred to the law enforcement agency and the property is removed from the audited inventory. Congressional Reporting Requirements The statute does not require any regular reports to Congress on the 1033 Program. Additional Information Resources More information regarding the 1033 Program is available through the LESO website (http://www.dispositionservices.dla.mil/leso/pages/default.aspx). A number of states maintain their own law enforcement support offices that post program information tailored to their own jurisdictions (e.g., Ohio s Law Enforcement Support Office at http://ohioleso.ohio.gov/). Congressional Research Service 4

Appendix A. Text of Section 1208 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 1990 (P.L. 101-189) SEC. 1208. TRANSFER OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY (a) TRANSFER AUTHORIZED- (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may transfer to Federal and State agencies personal property of the Department of Defense, including small arms and ammunition, that the Secretary determines is-- (A) suitable for use by such agencies in counter-drug activities; and (B) excess to the needs of the Department of Defense. (2) Personal property transferred under this section may be transferred without cost to the recipient agency. (3) The Secretary shall carry out this section in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of National Drug Control Policy. (b) CONDITIONS FOR TRANSFER- The Secretary may transfer personal property under this section only if-- (1) the property is drawn from existing stocks of the Department of Defense; and (2) the transfer is made without the expenditure of any funds available to the Department of Defense for the procurement of defense equipment. (c) APPLICATION- The authority of the Secretary to transfer personal property under this section shall expire on September 30, 1992. Congressional Research Service 5

Appendix B. Text of 10 U.S.C. 2576a, Excess Personal Property: Sale or Donation For Law Enforcement Activities 2576a. Excess personal property: sale or donation for law enforcement activities (a) Transfer authorized. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may transfer to Federal and State agencies personal property of the Department of Defense, including small arms and ammunition, that the Secretary determines is-- (A) suitable for use by the agencies in law enforcement activities, including counterdrug and counter-terrorism activities; and (B) excess to the needs of the Department of Defense. (2) The Secretary shall carry out this section in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of National Drug Control Policy. (b) Conditions for transfer. The Secretary of Defense may transfer personal property under this section only if-- (1) the property is drawn from existing stocks of the Department of Defense; (2) the recipient accepts the property on an as-is, where-is basis; (3) the transfer is made without the expenditure of any funds available to the Department of Defense for the procurement of defense equipment; and (4) all costs incurred subsequent to the transfer of the property are borne or reimbursed by the recipient. (c) Consideration. Subject to subsection (b)(4), the Secretary may transfer personal property under this section without charge to the recipient agency. (d) Preference for certain transfers. In considering applications for the transfer of personal property under this section, the Secretary shall give a preference to those applications indicating that the transferred property will be used in the counter-drug or counter-terrorism activities of the recipient agency. 13 13 This section was added by the Act of September 23, 1996, P.L. 104-201, Division A, Title X, Subtitle B, 1033(a)(1), 110 Stat. 2639. Congressional Research Service 6

Author Contact Information Daniel H. Else Specialist in National Defense delse@crs.loc.gov, 7-4996 Congressional Research Service 7