RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Transcription

1 PE NUMBER: F PE TITLE: Theater Missile Defense RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY COST ($ In Thousands) Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Cost to Complete Cost Program Element (PE) Cost 26,688 30,352 26,129 28,551 28,212 25,408 24,040 24,540 Continuing TBD 4478 Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Enhancements 19,103 22,598 17,903 19,802 18,289 15,083 13,489 13,769 Continuing TBD 4479 Attack Operations Concept Development 7,585 7,754 8,226 8,749 9,923 10,325 10,551 10,771 Continuing TBD Quantity of RDT&E Articles (U) A. Mission Description Air Force Theater Missile Defense/Time Critical Target (TMD/TCT) effort is focused in two areas: Battle Management/Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (BM/C4I) enhancements and improvements to existing Attack Operations systems. AF TMD concentrates on defining improvements to existing operational capabilities, developing and evaluating prototypes, demonstrating as well as simulating modifications during operational concept demonstrations, and coordinating the transition of these capabilities to operational systems. BM/C4I projects [including, for example, Dynamic Battle Management, Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA), Automatic Application of Intelligence Preparation of Battlespace (A2IPB) and Joint TADIL-J Range Extension (JRE)] reduce timelines required to negate TCTs by increasing interoperability, improving battle management tools, and providing accurate target data via datalinks for Offensive Counterair (Attack Operations) against Time Critical Targets (TCTs). Attack Operations focuses on improving the ability to locate, identify, target and destroy theater missiles and supporting infrastructure, including theater missile threats in production, deployment, prior to and during launch, as well as soon after launch before critical mobile targets are able to egress to hide locations. The foundation for Attack Operations is improved C4I and advanced sensors and target identification capabilities, CONOPS and requirements development for offensive counterair and optimized integration with defensive systems. The AF TMD program seeks to improve existing operational capability, evaluate and demonstrate prototypes, as well as simulate and demonstrate modifications during operational concept demonstrations. This program is in Activity 7 because its projects are upgrades to existing operational systems. Page 1 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE F) 1317

2 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) (U) B. Activity Justification This program is in Activity 7 because its projects are upgrades to existing operational systems. (U) C. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Cost (U) Previous President s 26,873 31,057 29,605 32,394 TBD (U) Appropriated Value 29,182 31,057 (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value a. Congressional General Reductions -1, b. Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) -585 c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram -182 d. Below Threshold Reprogramming (U) Adjustments to Years Since FY 1999 PB -3,476-3,843 (U) Current Submit/FY 2000 PB 26,688 30,352 26,129 28,551 TBD (U) Significant Program Changes: FY99: $1,004 identified as a source for SBIR Page 2 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2 (PE F) 1318

3 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) 4478 COST ($ In Thousands) Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Cost to Complete Cost 4478 Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Enhancements 19,103 22,598 17,903 19,802 18,289 15,083 13,489 13,769 Continuing TBD (U) A. Mission Description C4I enhancements are needed to reduce timelines required to negate TCTs by increasing interoperability, improving battle management tools, and providing accurate target data via datalinks for Offensive Counterair (Attack Operations) against Time Critical Targets (TCTs). The CAF CONOPS for C2 Against Time Critical Targets and Air Superiority Mission Area Plan (MAP) provide the foundation. The BM/C 4 I program encompasses: 1) Dynamic Battle Management (DBM) ACC vision for providing flexible, centralized C2 throughout conflict spectrum to meet Joint Vision 2010 objectives. Will allow JFACC to tailor decentralized execution to best meet the ROE and span of control requirements enabling prosecution of any TCT. DBM will identify technical capabilities and migration path required to support DBM environment consisting of wide area connectivity, decision support tools, and shared information. 2) Automated Planning Tools / Decision Aids which prototypes and demonstrates advanced decision aid capabilities to upgrade the battle management tools and infrastructure to better execute the TMD mission. Examples include the integration of the Time Critical Target Aid (TCTA) and Joint Defensive Planner (JDP) into Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS)/ Global Command and Control System (GCCS) architecture as well as the development and migration of the Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA) into TACS platforms. 3) Intelligence Preparation Of Battlespace (IPB) which enables the Commander and supporting staff to visualize the full spectrum of adversary capabilities and course of actions (COAs) across all dimensions of the battlespace. Examples include the revision of the methodology for the IPB process as it supports TMD; development of a website populated with linked digital products; generation of training material for use in Air Force schoolhouse and field IPB training; and development of a software Automated Application of IPB (A2IPB) tool for TBMCS/GCCS to assist the intelligence analyst at a Joint Intelligence Center (JIC) and the Intel/Ops Planner at an AOC. 4) Data Link Connectivity which provides upgrades to existing Air Force platforms to better utilize existing communications systems. These include JTIDS TMD Message Set Integration and JTIDS gateways to extend range beyond line of sight and interface with National Technical Means (NTM) to provide attack and early launch reporting to theater. Project 4478 Page 3 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1319

4 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) 4478 (U) ($ in Thousands): (U) 3,826 Enhanced DBM development/m&s environment (JSTARS and AWACS) tunnels assuming and sharing BMC4I responsiblities) with DBM unique prototyping/technology; conduct DBM demonstration to divert fighters from original ATO target to prosecute TCTs. (U) 2,965 Integrated Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace (IPB) evolutionary prototype (EP1) with TBMCS; adapted IPB tool for Air Intelligence Agency s Virtual Production environment; investigated area limitation functionality and tool integration, demonstrate automated procedures and system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations, CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. Completed Area Limitation Technical Requirements Document (TRD) and kickoff Joint Operational Requirements Document (JORD) development (U) 6,112 Integrated JDP V1.0 and TCTA (ground targeting) with TBMCS 1.0 and release; began AODA prototype/technology development; kicked off Joint Targeting Execution (JTE) collaborative ID concept exploration and Automatic Target Recognition(ATR)/TCTA integration efforts. (U) 5,712 Conducted JTIDS Range Extension prototype development; defined and implemented Improved Situation Awareness for Missiles (ISAM) process; completed Communications Planning Module (CPM) prototype; investigated C4I contribution to Attack Operations and Real Time Information in cockpit (RTIC). (U) 488 Conducted MCE/TPS-75 Missile Tracking in-plant and field testing and final prototype delivery. (U) $19,103 (U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): (U) 6,104 Conduct DBM operations onboard AWACS and JSTARS live-fly platforms during EFX 99. (U) 5,690 Continue to develop IPB evolutionary prototypes (EPs) for TBMCS and Air Intelligence Agency s Virtual Production environment; demonstrate improved automated procedures and IPB system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations (OCDs), CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. Complete JORD and begin Area Limitation Module spiral 1 development (U) 6,865 Complete AODA spiral 1 prototype development and EFX 99 demonstration; integrate and demonstrate JTE concept in laboratory (single site); complete ATR/TCTA integration and EFX 99 demonstration; kickoff Intelligence Surveillance Recce (ISR) Real Time Requirements Defininition effort; utilize TCT Testbed to improve integration into operational systems and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. (U) 3,155 Complete JRE prototype development, EFX 99 demonstration, and implementation plan; perform kill chain based C4I analysis and ops/intel integration of RTIC. (U) 748 Identified as a source for SBIR (U) $22,598 Project 4478 Page 4 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1320

5 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) 4478 (U) FY 2000 ($ in Thousands): (U) 4,448 Expand DBM to include upgrades for AOC and GTACS and conduct DBM operations during EFX 00. (U) 5,893 Continue to develop IPB evolutionary prototypes (EPs) for TBMCS and Air Intelligence Agency s Virtual Production environment; demonstrate improved automated procedures and IPB system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations (OCDs), CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. Complete Area Limitation Module spiral 2 prototype development and conduct EFX 00 demonstration (U) 4,819 Complete AODA spiral 2 prototype development and conduct EFX 00 demonstration; continue to develop JTE and conduct EFX 00 demonstration (distributed, collaborative targeting); Kickoff ISR-Real Time prototype development effort; maintain TCT Testbed to improve integration into operational systems and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. (U) 2,743 Continue to explore communications improvements that compress Theater Missile engagement timelines and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. (U) $17,903 (U) FY 2001 ($ in Thousands): (U) 5,509 Continue expansion of DBM to include upgrades for AOC and GTACS and conduct DBM operations during EFX 00. (U) 5,974 Continue to develop IPB evolutionary prototypes (EPs) for TBMCS and Air Intelligence Agency s Virtual Production environment; demonstrate improved automated procedures and IPB system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations (OCDs), CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. Complete Area Limitation Module spiral 2 prototype development and conduct EFX 00 demonstration (U) 4,900 Complete AODA spiral 2 prototype development and conduct EFX 00 demonstration; continue to develop JTE and conduct EFX 00 demonstration (distributed, collaborative targeting); kickoff ISR-Real Time prototype development effort; maintain TCT Testbed to improve integration into operational systems and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. (U) 3,419 Continue to explore communications improvements that compress Theater Missile engagement timelines and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. (U) $19,802 (U) B. Project Change Summary - Description of Significant Changes Not Applicable Project 4478 Page 5 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1321

6 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) (U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) 4478 To FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Compl Cost (U) RDT&E, BMDO PMA F3261, BM/C4I 11,134 9,885 13,293 12,855 13,025 13,202 12,959 13,224 TBD TBD (U) D. Acquisition Strategy: HQ Electronic Systems Center (ESC) provides program management for the concept exploration of C4I enhancements. Prototypes and analysis of improvements to existing C4I assets will complement the Attack Operations effort with combined participation in Operational Concept Demonstrations. These Attack Operations and C4I analyses and demonstrations are specifically targeted against operational deficiencies identified in the TMD Mission Area Plan (MAP), are traceable to the AF and JROC Mission Need Statement (MNS) and are consistent with the Air Force and Joint TMD CONOPS and in accordance with Joint Doctrine. Integration of TMD requirements and fielding of proposed material solutions will continue beyond concept exploration in the appropriate program element for a particular system. For example, the TMD demonstration and requirements analysis for F-15E ATC/R may transition into a F-15E Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) and P3I project within the F-15E program element. Existing contracts will be used for those systems where engineering change proposals are appropriate. Systems Engineering and Technical Analysis (SETA) contracts will be used to support the requirements definition phase of TMD improvements. In those areas where new material solutions are necessary to correct a deficiency, the source selection process will be followed. Project 4478 Page 6 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1322

7 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) (U) E. Schedule Profile: 4478 (U) TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker Prototypes/Contingency Support Systems (U) Establish DBM dev. environment; unique prototyping/technology development; EFX demonstrations (U) Demonstrate automated IPB procedures and system capabilities in Ops Concept Demos, CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. (U) Explore use of promising planning tools, C2 decision aids, computer processing improvements, sensor fusion technology and sensor upgrades to TACS (U) Continue to explore JTIDS/Link-16 Integration & Beyond LOS improvements that compress engagement timelines and demonstrate integrated capabilities FY1998 FY1999 FY 2000 FY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Project 4478 Page 7 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1323

8 RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) 4478 (U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($0 in Thousands) FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 (U) MCE/TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker (EMT) prototype (U) Dynamic Battle Management (DBM) 3,826 6,140 4,448 5,509 (U) Intelligence Preparation of Battlespace (IPB) 2,965 5,690 5,893 5,974 (U) Automated Decision Aids/Planning Tools 6,114 6,865 4,819 4,900 (U) JTIDS/Link-16 Integration & Beyond LOS Capability 5,712 3,155 2,743 3,419 (U) Identified as a source for SBIR FY (U) 19,103 22,598 17,903 19,802 Project 4478 Page 8 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE F) 1324

9 RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) (U) B. Acquisition History and Planning Information ($0 in Thousands) Performing Organizations: 4478 Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete Program Product Development Organizations Martin Marietta FFP Oct 95 N/A N/A 9, ,100 (TACCSF) North/Grumman FFP Oct 95 N/A N/A ,000 (TPS-75) Zeltech/SPARTA T&M May 96 N/A N/A 500 2,294 3,693 TBD TBD Continuing TBD PSR (IPB) Alphatech (JDP) T&M Mar 95 N/A N/A Continuing TBD Boeing (DBM) T&M Dec 97 N/A N/A ,126 TBD TBD Continuing TBD Northrop T&M Dec 97 N/A N/A ,126 TBD TBD Continuing TBD Grumman (DBM) BDM (DBM) T&M Nov 97 N/A N/A TBD TBD Continuing TBD For Profit T&M Jan 98 N/A N/A TBD TBD Continuing TBD Contractor (DBM) Motorola (TCTA) T&M Mar 96 N/A N/A LMCCS (JDP) T&M Oct 97 N/A N/A 1, ,400 For Profit TBD Oct 97 N/A N/A 0 1,316 1,900 TBD TBD Continuing TBD Contractor (AODA) For Profit TBD Dec 97 N/A N/A 0 1, TBD TBD Continuing TBD Contractor (MSI) Lock/Mart (MSI) T&M Mar 97 N/A N/A Project 4478 Page 9 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE F) 1325

10 RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) Contractor or Government Performing Activity For Profit Contractor (CPM) For Profit Contractor (Analyses) Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Prior to 4478 to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Complete Program T&M Oct 97 N/A N/A TBD TBD Continuing TBD TBD Nov 97 N/A N/A ,194 TBD TBD Continuing TBD MASC T&M Nov 96 N/A N/A Continuing TBD For Profit TBD Oct 97 N/A N/A 0 2,619 5,152 TBD TBD Continuing TBD Contractor (JRE) Support and Management Organizations FFRDC N/A N/A 1,605 1,994 2,054 2,116 2,180 Continuing TBD Non-FFRDC N/A N/A 1,935 1,040 1,071 1,103 1,136 Continuing TBD (ESC) Non-FFRDC N/A N/A 0 1, Continuing TBD (ACC) Non-FFRDC N/A N/A Continuing TBD (XORFS) HQ ESC N/A N/A 2,251 1,286 1,077 1,109 1,142 Continuing TBD Test and Evaluation Organizations TBD Government Furnished Property: Identified as a source for SBIR FY Subtotal Product Development 9,600 12,243 16,181 12,064 13,787 Continuing TBD Subtotal Support and Management 5,791 6,860 5,669 5,839 6,015 Continuing TBD Subtotal Test and Evaluation TBD Project 4478 Page 10 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE F) 1326

11 Project 15,391 19,103 22,598 17,903 19,802 Continuing TBD 1327

12 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) 4479 COST ($ In Thousands) Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Cost to Complete Cost 4479 Attack Operations Concept Development 7,585 7,754 8,226 8,749 9,923 10,325 10,551 10,771 Continuing TBD (U) A. Mission Description Improvements in Attack Operations are based on the ability to locate, identify, and destroy theater missiles, their launchers, and associated infrastructure on the ground. In addition to the enhancements to C4I, the Attack Operations Project focuses on advanced sensor and target identification capabilities, CONOPS and requirements development for TMD offensive counter-air and their optimized integration with defensive systems. Specific technologies such as automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) and moving target indicator/track (MTI/T) upgrades to Joint STARS, F-15E and potentially the U-2, F-16 and UAVs are to be analyzed using constructive analysis and evaluated through Technology/Operational Concept Demonstrations and CINC Experiments along with command and control connectivity upgrades critical to their optimum employment against time-critical targets. Effectiveness and affordability parameters defined will be used in support of follow on acquisition decisions involving P3I upgrades to existing weapon systems and potential new start programs within existing/other program elements. (U) ($ in Thousands): (U) 2,033 Conducted Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. (U) 842 Continued analysis of architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades, incorporated model and threat scenario upgrades and performed engagement analyses for input to future year mission analysis. (U) 3,725 Conducted development of F-15E ATC/R prototype integrated with improved on/off-board sensor fusion. Continued demonstration of (U) 985 surveillance ATR prototype. Planned integration of prototype ATR WH&SW into Time-Critical Targeting Aid workstation. (U) 7,585 (U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): (U) 1,362 Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. (U) 1,520 Continue analysis of updated architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades, to support future year mission analysis. Plan participation in future year distributed simulations to demonstrate improvements in attack operations capabilities. (U) 2,691 (U) 1,925 Conduct demonstration of F-15E ATC/R prototype with sensor fusion. Conduct development of common ATR for integration in the Time-Critical Targeting Aid (TCTA) for multi-sensor application. Continue development and demonstration planning of ATR onboard the JSTARS test aircraft (T3). (U) 256 FY99 SBIR Project 4479 Page 11 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1328

13 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) (U) 7, (U) FY 2000 ($ in Thousands): (U) 2,145 Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. (U) 1,900 (U) 2,090 (U) 2,091 Continue analysis of architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades. Participate in a distributed simulation to verify improvements in attack operations capabilities from sensor to shooter that were demonstrated on prototype attack and surveillance system. Support development of users operational requirements for weapon system ORDs. Conduct demonstration of prototype TCTA with ATR. Conduct demonstration of JSTARS ATR with expanded target set of time-critical targets. Conduct development of F-15E ATC/R prototype with on- and off-board sensor fusion. Perform lab demonstration of prototyped capabilities. (U) 8,226 (U) FY 2001 ($ in Thousands): (U) 2,080 Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. (U) 2,200 Continue analysis of architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades. Participate in a distributed simulation to verify improvements in attack operations capabilities from sensor to shooter that were demonstrated on prototype attack and surveillance system. Support development of users operational requirements for weapon system ORDs. (U) 2,235 Conduct development of F-15E ATC/R prototype with on- and off-board sensor fusion. Integrate prototyped HW & SW on F-15E aircraft. (U) 2,234 Conduct development of prototype ATR HW & SW for multisensor application in the TCTA. (U) 8,749 (U) B. Project Change Summary - Description of Significant Changes: Not Applicable (U)Not Applicable C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) Project 4479 Page 12 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1329

14 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2A Exhibit) 4479 (U) D. Acquisition Strategy: HQ Avionics Systems Center (ASC) provides the program management for the concept exploration of TMD Attack Operations. ASC conducts lab demonstrations with Wright Labs and supports Concept of Operations (CONOPS) development and requirements definition by analyzing and demonstrating measures of effectiveness for various sensor improvements and cueing schemes. (U) E. Schedule Profile FY 1999 FY 2000 FY (U) ATC/R Demos (F-15E/Surveillance) X X X X (U) Ops Concept Demonstrations X X X X Project 4479 Page 13 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-2A (PE F) 1330

15 RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) 4479 (U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 (U) Joint STARS ATC/R Demonstration/Improvements 985 1,925 2,091 2,234 (U) Operational Concept Demonstration 2,033 1,362 2,145 2,080 (U) Sensor Prototypes and Attack Ops Demonstrations/Sims 842 1,520 1,900 2,200 (U) F-15E ATC/R Demonstrations 3,725 2,691 2,090 2,235 (U) Identified as a source for SBIR 256 (U) 7,585 7,754 8,226 8,749 U) B. Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete Progra m Product Development Organizations Identified as a source for SBIR Boeing CPFF Aug 94 N/A N/A Boeing CPFF 30 May 86 N/A N/A Geometric CPFF Mar 95 N/A N/A Hughes-FD CPFF Mar 95 N/A N/A 1,234 3,006 1,915 1,700 1,700 Continuing TBD Norden CPFF Sep 94 N/A N/A Veda CPFF Feb 95 N/A N/A Lincoln Lab MIPR Mar 95 N/A N/A Project 4479 Page 14 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE F) 1331

16 Contractor or Government Performing Activity RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Prior to FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete 4479 Progra m Sverdrup CPFF Mar 95 N/A N/A HSC/AL MIPR Aug 94 N/A N/A 2, ,470 Sandia Nat Labs MIPR Mar 95 N/A N/A 8, ,586 Lockheed Martin MIPR TBD N/A N/A ,771 1,600 1,600 Continuing TBD Optimetrics CPFF TBD N/A N/A Continuing TBD ESC//JTF MIPR TBD N/A N/A Grumman MIPR Sep 96 N/A N/A ACC/XPSAS MIPR TBD N/A N/A Continuing TBD WL/AAZ MIPR TBD N/A N/A WL/AAR MIPR TBD N/A N/A Continuing TBD AL/CFHI MIPR TBD N/A N/A Continuing TBD WL/AAJT MIPR TBD N/A N/A Continuing TBD Support and Management Organizations FFRDC N/A N/A Continuing TBD Non-FFRDC N/A N/A Continuing TBD HQ ASC N/A N/A Continuing TBD Test and Evaluation Organizations 28 Test/TOT MIPR Mar 95 N/A N/A ,581 1,075 Continuing TBD AFSAA MIPR Feb 95 N/A N/A Eglin-46 Tst Wg May 94 N/A N/A 5, Continuing TBD Project 4479 Page 15 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE F) 1332

17 RDT&E PROGRAM ELEMENT/ COST BREAKDOWN (R-3) Government Furnished Property: Contract Method/Type Award or Item or Funding Obligation Delivery Prior to Description Vehicle Date Date FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 to Complete 4479 Program Identified as a source for SBIR 256 Subtotal Product Development 15,422 5,267 5,713 5,375 6,454 Continuing TBD Subtotal Support and Management 1,789 1, ,170 1,170 Continuing TBD Subtotal Test and Evaluation 5,663 1, ,681 1,125 Continuing TBD Project 22,874 7,585 7,754 8,226 8,749 Continuing TBD Project 4479 Page 16 of 16 Pages Exhibit R-3 (PE F) 1333