OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENS E (PUBLIC AFFAIRS )
|
|
- Blaze Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENS E (PUBLIC AFFAIRS ) WASHINGTON, D.C PLEASE NOTE DATE No HOLD FOR RELEASE AT 7 :30 AM, EASTERN TIME, JANUARY 29, 1992 (703) (info ) (703) (copies ) (703) (public/industry ) DOD TO SLOW PACE OF MODERNIZATION, CUT STRATEGIC NUCLEAR ARSENA L WHILE MAINTAINING ESSENTIAL FORCE S The President's FY 1993 budget calls for a new approach i n the way the Defense Department buys major weapons systems an d keeps its forces modern, while maintaining a military capable o f responding to regional contingencies. And the President' s FY program includes changes to the US strategic nuclea r program, beginning to move the US away from a relationship o f nuclear confrontation with the republics of the former Sovie t Union, Defense Secretary Dick Cheney said today. The administration is seeking $267.6 billion in DoD budge t authority for fiscal year 1993, $9.9 billion below the budge t passed by Congress for FY 1992 and a decline of seven percent i n real terms, adjusted for inflation. The cuts in the defens e budget go beyond the steep cuts already undertaken -- amountin g to a decline in budget authority of over one-third in real term s since The FY 93 budget submission also cuts the Department's si x year defense plan, for FY , by $63.8 billion, compare d to the six year plan presented last year for the same period. That total includes $50.4 billion in cuts to the defense progra m and $13.4 billion in adjustments required under the budge t summit agreement, based on changes in the 1991 rate o f inflation. The budget proposes FY 1993 outlays of $ billion, $9.8 billion below FY 92. Outlays for FY woul d be cut by $27.4 billion over last year's defense plan. "The national security picture for the United States ha s changed substantially since last year. The disintegration o f the Soviet Union has reduced the threat to US interests an d eliminated the urgency for producing several advanced weapon s systems," Cheney said. Many of the developments wer e anticipated in the regional defense strategy first announced b y President Bush in August of 1990, he said. (More)
2 (More Budget, ) The growing proliferation of ballistic missile capabilit y and weapons of mass destruction makes the funding of the President's program for global protection against limite d strikes a high priority for our strategic programs. Funding fo r the strategic defense initiative remains a top priority, with a request for $5.4 billion in budget authority for FY 1993, compared to the FY 1992 total of $4.1 billion. Defense budget trend s From FY 1993 through FY 1997, DoD budget authority wil l decline, in real terms, an average of four percent each year. By FY 1997, the cumulative real decline in budget authorit y since FY the year of peak defense spending -- will tota l 37 percent. Budget authority for FY 1997, adjusted fo r inflation, will produce about the same buying power as the defense budget and only slightly more than that of the post - Vietnam drawdown defense budgets of Defense outlays as a share of the US gross national produc t are expected to fall to 3.4 percent in FY 1997, well below an y time since before World War II. In FY 1997 defense outlay s should be down to 16 percent of total federal outlays. While defense spending has been shrinking since 1985, domestic spending has been growing -- going up by about the sam e rate at which defense spending is going down. By FY 1997, the cumulative real decline in defense outlays since FY 1985 will b e 26 percent. Mandatory federal spending will increase about 3 3 percent in real terms over the same period, and domesti c discretionary outlays will increase about 8 percent. New approach to acquisition The disintegration of the Soviet Union has reduced th e military threat to US interests, making the need to produc e advanced weapons systems less urgent. The Department of Defens e can afford to take more time in developing and evaluating ne w technologies before making decisions on weapons production. With more reliance on its research and development efforts, th e Department can preserve the technological capability to quickl y equip larger forces if major threats to US interests emerge i n the future. While DoD will put fewer new advanced weapons systems int o production in the future, the aggressive pursuit of ne w technologies will be essential to maintaining the advantages U S armed forces need to deter and to prevail in future conflicts. A weapons program will move to full-scale production only afte r verifying the need for producing the system, and afte r minimizing technical, manufacturing, and operational risks. The Pentagon will also emphasize the upgrading of existing weapon s (More)
3 (More Budget, ) role in regional conflicts. The Gulf War confirmed th e advantage of combining precision weapons and stealt h technologies. Twenty B-2's will allow the Air Force to maintai n two squadrons while also permitting aircraft maintenance. Wit h the transformation of the Soviet threat, America's strategi c bomber force is less likely to face the sophisticated ai r defenses for which the B-2 is designated. The current strategi c force of B-lB's and B-52's can be adapted to ensure adequat e capabilities for strategic nuclear and conventional missions. Stealth technology remains a key advantage for U.S. forces, an d the Department will initiate vigorous exploration of improve d stealth technologies. Total B-2 program adjustments will sav e $14.5 through Minuteman III ICBM. To help compensate for the terminatio n of the Midgetman small ICBM, DoD will fund an improved guidanc e system for the Minuteman III ICBM and other measures to exten d its service life, yielding net savings of $1.0 billion throug h Seawolf submarine. With the Soviet Union's collapse, th e United States no longer needs to proceed with a new class o f attack submarine. The Seawolf program will accordingly b e terminated. The existing SSN-688 submarine is among the mos t capable in the world and will serve the nation well for man y more years. DoD plans to consider a lower cost submarine desig n that will enable it to modernize in the future while maintainin g adequate submarine force levels for the coming years. DoD als o will continue to develop other antisubmarine warfare systems. These changes in the submarine acquisition program will sav e $17.5 billion through Comanche helicopter. With their focus shifted from a Sovie t threat to regional contingencies, US forces can be adequatel y supported with the existing Apache helicopter fleet, to b e upgraded with the Longbow advanced fire control radar system, OH-58D reconnaissance and light attack helicopters, and greate r use of unmanned aerial vehicles. DoD will restructure th e Comanche light helicopter development program by deferrin g production and concentrating instead on building prototypes, developing avionics, upgrading the engine, and incorporatin g Longbow. Redirecting the program will save $3.4 billion throug h Air defense antitank system. Because non-soviet air threat s to US ground forces are limited in number and capability, U S forces can maintain adequate air defense assets with existin g air defense fighters and with such defense systems as th e Patriot, Hawk, and Stinger. The Department is therefor e terminating the Army's air defense antitank system (ADATS). T o compensate, DoD will initiate development of an improve d aircraft tracking system and several advanced guidanc e (More)
4 (More Budget, ) Enforcement Act, US spending on the Persian Gulf war is treate d as an emergency funding requirement, not subject to the budge t ceilings set by Congress and the Administration. To offset these incremental costs, US allies have pledged t o contribute $54 billion. The US will not replace some types o f damaged or destroyed equipment, valued at $1.2 billion, becaus e the Department has sufficient remaining supplies. That leaves a net cost to the US for the war of $5.9 billion. Of these costs, transfers within the previously appropriate d 1990 defense budget covered $1 billion, and a supplementa l request in 1990 covered another $2.0 billion, leaving $2. 9 billion in costs for long-term personnel benefits for those wh o served in the war. Those costs will be paid in future years b y the Veterans Administration. "The war in the Gulf set a remarkable standard o f cooperation, and not only on the battlefield. It is absolutel y unprecedented that more than four-fifths of the cost of the U S part in the operation was paid for by our allies in the Persia n Gulf and elsewhere around the world," Cheney noted. As of January 1992, allied contributions to the US for Gul f war costs were $52.6 billion -- $47.0 billion in cash and $5. 6 billion in in-kind assistance. Allied payments continue, an d the remainder is expected by July Other FY 1993 Defense budget highlight s Readiness. Although the size of the US military i s shrinking, the Department of Defense is committed to ensurin g the maintenance of a fully manned, trained, and equipped force. The FY 1993 request accordingly provides the training, maintenance, and other requirements to sustain the high level o f readiness achieved by US forces over the past decade. Activ e Army ground and air training operations are kept at 800 mile s per year for combat vehicles and 14.5 tactical flying hours pe r month for air crews. Navy steaming days remain at 50.5 days a quarter for deployed fleets and 29 days a quarter for non - deployed fleets. Flying hours for active Air Force tactical ai r crews will hold at about 21 hours per month. Research, development, testing, and evaluation. Reflectin g the Department's emphasis on advanced technology research fo r application in weapons systems of the future, funding fo r science and technology -- research not tied to a specifi c weapons program -- will grow to $12 billion in FY 1993, fro m $10.6 billion in FY 1992, a real growth rate of 9.1 percent. Total RDT&E will show a 1.5 percent real growth in FY end - Please refer to the attached charts for more details on th e FY 1993 budget submission.
5 NATIONAL DEFENSE TOPLINE * (Current $ Billions ) BUDGET AUTHORIT Y DoD DoE & Other TOTAL OUTLAY S DoD DoE & Other TOTAL * Excludes Cost of Desert Shield/Desert Storm
6 DOD BUDGET AUTHORIT Y ($ Billions ) CU M , President's FY 1992 Budget Adjusted Summit Level (-13.4) Program Adjustments (Rescissjons/Supplemental ) President's FY 1993 DoD Budget * (-63.8) * Excludes cost of Desert Shield/Desert Storm.
7 DOD BUDGET AUTHORITY BY TITLE * ($ Billions ) Military Personnel O & M Procurement R DT & E Military Construction Family Housing Revolving Funds Transfer All Other GRAND TOTAL * Excludes Cost of Desert Shield/Desert Storm.
8 DOD BUDGET AUTHORITY BY SERVICE * ($ Billions ) Army Navy Air Force Defense Agencies Defense Wide Defense Medical Program - (9.1) (9.5 ) GRAND TOTAL * Excludes Cost of Desert Shield/Desert Stor m
9 Constant Dollars (in billions) DoD BUDGET AUTHORITY (Excluding DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM Costs ) APRIL 1989 PLA N Average Real Increase = 1.2 % per yea r ACTUAL I I I , FY 1991 DOD BUDGE T Average Real Decline = 2 % per year 1 anle 255 Real Decline fro m FY 1992 Enacted to FY 1993 = 7 % FY 1992 DOD BUDGE T A Real rage Real Decline 3 % per yea r Cumulative Real Decline : = 29 % = 37 % Average Real Decline = 4 % per yea r 21 0 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97
10 60 - s % % % % 23% 10 - FY 1993 = 18.0 % FY 1997 = 16.3 % I l Il l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I FISCAL YEAR
11 % % % 4.7 % FY 199 =4.5 % 2 FY 1997 = 3.4 % 0 I FISCAL YEAR S
12 NATIONAL DEFENSE & PAYMENTS TO INDIVIDUAL S (as a Percent of Total Federal Spending ) PAYMENTS TO INDIVIDUAL S 60 - Increase to 61 % by '-O NATIONAL DEFENS E Declines to 16 % by I I I I I 1 I I l I I I I I I l 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 l I I
FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK
FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK February 2018 Table of Contents The Fiscal Year 2019 Budget in Context 2 The President's Request 3 Nuclear Weapons and Non-Proliferation 6 State
More informationA Ready, Modern Force!
A Ready, Modern Force! READY FOR TODAY, PREPARED FOR TOMORROW! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby! The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!!
More informationNATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2001
NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2001 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) MARCH 2000 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2001 This document is prepared and distributed as
More informationNATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005
NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) MARCH 2004 NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2005 This document is prepared and distributed as
More informationCRS Report for Con. The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber
CRS Report for Con The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber Approved {,i. c, nt y,,. r r'ii^i7" Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs
More informationNATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004
NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004 This document is prepared and distributed as a convenient reference source for the National Defense budget estimates for FY 2004. It also provides selected current
More informationSummary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)
Top Line 1 Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157) September 24, 2018 A. Total Appropriations: House: Total discretionary funding: $667.5 billion (an increase of $20.1
More informationFISCAL YEAR 2012 DOD BUDGET
The American Legion Legislative Point Paper Background: FISCAL YEAR 2012 DOD BUDGET On July 8 the House by a vote of 336-87 passed H.R. 2219 the Department of Defense (DOD) spending measure for FY 2012.
More informationIssue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (
Issue Briefs Volume 3, Issue 10, July 9, 2012 In the coming weeks, following a long bipartisan tradition, President Barack Obama is expected to take a step away from the nuclear brink by proposing further
More informationGreat Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018
Great Decisions 2018 Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018 I. Funding America s four militaries not as equal as they look Times Square Strategy wears a dollar sign*
More informationChallenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003
Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003 Current and Future Security Environment Weapons of Mass Destruction Missile Proliferation?
More informationSetting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February
LT. REBECCA REBARICH/U.S. NAVY VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February 2016 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Introduction and summary In the
More informationSTATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001 NOT FOR PUBLICATION
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 01-153 June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 Today, the Army announced details of its budget for Fiscal Year 2002, which runs from October 1, 2001 through September 30,
More informationmm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m.,edt Tuesday May 3,1994 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE
More informationSeptember 30, Honorable Kent Conrad Chairman Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Dan L. Crippen, Director September 30, 2002 Honorable Kent Conrad Chairman Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
More informationDifferences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions
Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions Topline President s Request House Approved Senate Approved Department of Defense base budget $617.1 billion $616.7 billion
More informationDefense Budget Composition and Internal Pressures. Cindy Williams
Defense Budget Composition and Internal Pressures Cindy Williams 1 Overview of Talk Composition of the Department of Defense budget By appropriation title By major force program By military department
More informationNuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence
December 2016 Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence Thomas Karako Overview U.S. nuclear deterrent forces have long been the foundation of U.S. national security and the highest priority of
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationDepartment of Defense
5 Department of Defense Joanne Padrón Carney American Association for the Advancement of Science HIGHLIGHTS For the first time in recent years, the Department of Defense (DOD) R&D budget would decline,
More informationStatement of Rudolph G. Penner Director Congressional Budget Office
Statement of Rudolph G. Penner Director Congressional Budget Office before the Defense Policy Panel Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives October 8, 1985 This statement is not available
More informationApril 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director April 25, 2005 Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett Chairman Subcommittee on Projection Forces Committee on Armed Services
More informationGAO FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM. Funding Increase and Planned Savings in Fiscal Year 2000 Program Are at Risk
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives November 1999 FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM Funding Increase and Planned Savings in
More informationA FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT
Chapter Two A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT The conflict hypothesized involves a small island country facing a large hostile neighboring nation determined to annex the island. The fact that the primary attack
More information1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue
1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue Ffty years ago, Task Force Smith of the 241h Infantry Division- the first American ground forces deployed to defend South Korea - engaged
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
More informationOHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence
OHIO Replacement Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence 1 Why Recapitalize Our SSBN Force? As long as these weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure,
More informationPerspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program
Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program Hans M. Kristensen Director, Nuclear Information Project Federation of American
More informationCosts of Major U.S. Wars
Order Code RS22926 July 24, 2008 Costs of Major U.S. Wars Stephen Daggett Specialist in Defense Policy and Budgets Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary This CRS report provides estimates
More informationSTATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
More informationThe Air Force Aviation Investment Challenge
Jeremiah Gertler Specialist in Military Aviation December 11, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44305 Summary The United States Air Force is in the midst of an ambitious aviation
More informationSUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond
(Provisional Translation) SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES for FY 2011 and beyond Approved by the Security Council and the Cabinet on December 17, 2010 I. NDPG s Objective II. Basic Principles
More informationUS Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message
US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message Hans M. Kristensen* The Monthly Komei (Japan) June 2013 Four years ago, a newly elected President Barack Obama reenergized the international arms control community with
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
97-316 SPR CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Defense Research: A Primer on the Department of Defense s Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Program Updated May 5, 1998
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No.6 May 1989 THE FISCAL YEAR 1990 AMENDED BUbGET PREPARED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE AUSA INSTITU1E OF LAND WARFARE Association of The United States Army 2425 Wilson Boulevard Arlington,
More informationPENTAGON SPENDING AT HISTORICALLY HIGH LEVELS FOR OVER A DECADE
July 2017 For more information, contact Anthony Wier at fcnlinfo@fcnl.org PENTAGON SPENDING AT HISTORICALLY HIGH LEVELS FOR OVER A DECADE Discretionary outlays for budget function 050 [national defense];
More informationAssociation of. The United States Army ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1993 AN ANALYSIS
Association of The United States Army ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1993 AN ANALYSIS May 1992 ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1993 AN ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... v PART I- THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BUDGET...
More informationGLOBAL STRIKE THE INDISPENSABLE CAPABILITY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
GLOBAL STRIKE THE INDISPENSABLE CAPABILITY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Global Strike Global Strike the United States Air Force s unique ability to strike any target in the world at anytime. Global strike, when
More informationU.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center
U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center A Leader in Command and Control Systems By Kevin Gilmartin Electronic Systems Center The Electronic Systems Center (ESC) is a world leader in developing and fielding
More informationProposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association (
Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers,
More informationCONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. 9t ATEMENT K Dublic releoml Unib&itad S TUD Y. DTIC QUALITY INSFi Cxi L'ÄijU
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE S TUD Y 9t ATEMENT K Dublic releoml Unib&itad J DTIC QUALITY INSFi Cxi L'ÄijU AN ANALYSIS OF U.S. ARMY HELICOPTER PROGRAMS The Congress of the
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207134F PE TITLE: F-15E SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS Cost ($ in Millions)
More informationSection 6. Defense-Related Expenditures 1. Defense-Related Expenditures and Changes
Section 6. Defense-Related Expenditures 1. Defense-Related Expenditures and Changes Defense-related expenditures include spending for maintaining and managing the SDF, improving living conditions in the
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More informationCENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL
CENTER FOR ARMS CONTROL AND NON-PROLIFERATION MILITARY BUDGET AND OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 322 Fourth Street NE * Washington, D.C. 20002 * (202) 546-0795 Online at http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/ Fiscal Year
More informationProposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Published on Arms Control Association (
Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 20 to December 31, 20 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers, jeff@armscontrol.org
More informationIT S ALL IN THE NUMBERS. The major US Wars: a look-see at the cost in American lives and dollars. Anne Stemmerman Westwood Middle School
IT S ALL IN THE NUMBERS. The major US Wars: a look-see at the cost in American lives and dollars. Anne Stemmerman Westwood Middle School Lesson Plan Summary: This lesson plan is designed for students to
More informationTestimony of Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz
House Budget Committee Hearing on 2003 Defense Budget Request Washington, DC February 12, 2002 Introduction Testimony of Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
More information(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910
TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2018 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $113,906,877,000. The Committee recommendation provides $132,501,445,000 for the procurement accounts.
More informationDepartment of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003
Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1.0 Department of Defense Secondary Supply System Inventories A. Secondary Items - FY 1973 through FY 2003
More informationRECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES O. BARCLAY III DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 BEFORE THE
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES O. BARCLAY III DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AIRLAND COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ON ARMY MODERNIZATION
More informationFiscal Year 2017 President s Budget Request for the DoD Science & Technology Program April 12, 2016
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited; SR Case #16-S-1675 Fiscal Year 2017 President s Budget Request for the DoD Science & Technology Program April 12, 2016
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide For an additional amount for "Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide," to remain available until expended, $1,400,000,000, which may be
More informationModernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective
LLNL-TR-732241 Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective D. Tapia-Jimenez May 31, 2017 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
More informationNATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2012 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) MARCH 2011
NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2012 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) MARCH 2011 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the
More informationStrategic Cost Reduction
Strategic Cost Reduction American Society of Military Comptrollers May 29, 2014 Agenda Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Budget Uncertainty Efficiencies History Specific Efficiency Examples 2 Cost
More informationSOVIET STRATEGIC FORCE DEVELOPMENTS
SOVIET STRATEGIC FORCE DEVELOPMENTS TESTIMONY BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC AND THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE AND THE DEFENSE SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
More informationINTRODUCTION. From New Strategic Guidance to Budget Choices
We developed a defense strategy that transitions our defense enterprise from an emphasis on today s wars to preparing for future challenges, protects the broad range of U.S. national security interests,
More informationDTIC. The DoD Drawdown: Planned Spending and Employment Cuts AD-A MM. 0 fo pulic lele.i c;nd -oae; its
AD-A266 816 The DoD Drawdown: Planned Spending and Employment Cuts DTIC S LECTE 14:19 ' J DC201RI Irv Greenberg Lawrence Schwartz Peter F Kostiuk Earl R. Wingrove, III 0 fo pulic lele.i c;nd -oae; its
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
More informationCONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE A CBO STUDY JANUARY 23 The Long-Term Implications of Current Defense Plans 55 5 45 Billions of 22 Dollars Actual DoD's Five- Year Plan CBO's Projection
More informationAnalysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions
Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR 2810 Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions A. Treaties: 1. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty
More informationMtm MaMmg. ilillllllliiiil. äll&lii# tea^fe^^ S )lmjm?llii. f»sf» #«1f. Hlpll. s--\ QJü-n/^l/ftSWf ...ßJ. MtJ : f&? 'DlSTMBUfiOi'i ot4i'i;mi;s* Sp 8i
äll&lii# tea^fe^^ Hlpll S )lmjm?llii \l ^...ßJ ; 1 : Mtm MaMmg MtJ : f&? ES, ilillllllliiiil QJü-n/^l/ftSWf feisbj 'DlSTMBUfiOi'i ot4i'i;mi;s* Sp 8i s--\ t'/.>->'!spj5;': f»sf» #«1f GAO United States General
More informationGAO TACTICAL AIRCRAFT. DOD Needs a Joint and Integrated Investment Strategy
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives April 2007 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT DOD Needs
More informationBUDGET BRIEF Senator McCain and Outlining the FY18 Defense Budget
BUDGET BRIEF Senator McCain and Outlining the FY18 Defense Budget January 25, 2017 l Katherine Blakeley Author Date President Trump has promised a swift expansion in American military strength: adding
More informationJune 25, Honorable Kent Conrad Ranking Member Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington, DC
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE U.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director June 25, 2004 Honorable Kent Conrad Ranking Member Committee on the Budget United States Senate Washington,
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21921 Updated May 2, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Cruise Missile Defense Ravi R. Hichkad and Christopher Bolkcom Research Associate and Specialist in National
More informationA udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001
A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001
More informationLESSON 5: THE U.S. AIR FORCE
LESSON 5: THE U.S. AIR FORCE avionics parity payload proliferation stealth INTRODUCTION The U.S. Air Force exemplifies the dominant role of air and space power in meeting this nation s security needs across
More informationudit Hjport /jöjroo - ös - OVO Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT OF THE COMANCHE PROGRAM
udit Hjport ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT OF THE COMANCHE PROGRAM Report No. 99-021 November 4, 1998 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense BBC QUALITY INSPECTED 8 19991229 043 /jöjroo - ös - OVO
More informationFY16 Senate Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Senate Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Summary of S.1376, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 As of May 21, 2015 House Senate Passed in Committee April
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 22.756 - - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing 675043: Fighter Tactical
More informationAircraft Procurement Plan Fiscal Years (FY) Submitted with the FY 2012 Budget
Aircraft Procurement Plan Fiscal Years (FY) 212-241 Submitted with the FY 212 Budget March 2, 29 March 211 March 2, 29 Preparation of this study/report cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately
More informationReducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization
Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization Frank von Hippel, Program on Science and Global Security and International Panel on Fissile Materials, Princeton University Coalition for Peace Action
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE
More informationGAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009
GAO Review of Best Practices for Quality Assurance 17th Annual Conference on Quality in the Space and Defense Industries March 17, 2009 Michael Sullivan, Director Cheryl Andrew, Senior Defense Analyst
More informationCRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code IB10062 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Defense Research: DOD s Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Program Updated October 1, 2003 John D. Moteff Resources,
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationChapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY
Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense This chapter addresses air and missile defense support at the operational level of war. It includes a brief look at the air threat to CSS complexes and addresses CSS
More informationMore Data From Desert
USAF has released additional information about the Persian Gulf War, which opened five years ago this month. More Data From Desert PERATION Desert Storm Obegan on January 17, 1991, led off by a ferocious
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationNonstrategic Nuclear Weapons
Order Code RL32572 Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons Updated July 29, 2008 Amy F. Woolf Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons Summary During
More informationBallistic Missile Defense: Historical Overview
Order Code RS22120 Updated January 5, 2007 Ballistic Missile Defense: Historical Overview Steven A. Hildreth Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary For some
More informationDefense Support Program Celebrating 40 Years of Service
Defense Support Program Celebrating 40 Years of Service S i l e n t S e n t r i e s i n S p a c e Defense Support Program Celebrating 40 Years of Service For four decades, the Defense Support Program s
More informationMAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018
MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018 Overview Strategic Environment FY19 Budget Priorities FY19 Budget Request FY19 by Appropriation Final Thoughts I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21305 Updated January 3, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS): Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke Specialist in
More informationCONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. An Analysis of the Navy s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE An Analysis of the Navy s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan FEBRUARY 2017 Notes Unless otherwise indicated, all years referred to in this document
More informationWhat if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan
What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan Hans M. Kristensen hkristensen@fas.org 202-454-4695 Presentation to "Building Up or Breaking
More informationBUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE
BUDGET UNCERTAINTY AND MISSILE DEFENSE MDAA ISSUE BRIEF OCTOBER 2015 WES RUMBAUGH & KRISTIN HORITSKI Missile defense programs require consistent investment and budget certainty to provide essential capabilities.
More informationChapter 11 DIVERSITY OF U.S. STRATEGIC FORCES
Chapter 11 DIVERSITY OF U.S. STRATEGIC FORCES Chapter ll. DIVERSITY OF U.S. STRATEGIC FORCES Page Overview..................................................303 Diversity and Vulnerability.............................304
More informationOVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) OVERVIEW submitted to the Congress in June 2014. The Navy and Marine Corps approach to support the comprehensive strategy to degrade, and ultimately, defeat, the Islamic
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
More informationFighter/ Attack Inventory
Fighter/ Attack Fighter/ Attack A-0A: 30 Grounded 208 27.3 8,386 979 984 A-0C: 5 Grounded 48 27. 9,274 979 984 F-5A: 39 Restricted 39 30.7 6,66 975 98 F-5B: 5 Restricted 5 30.9 7,054 976 978 F-5C: 7 Grounded,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUC San Diego SITC Research Briefs
UC San Diego SITC Research Briefs Title The People's Liberation Army Air Force and the Chinese Aviation Industry Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1pf1d360 Journal SITC Research Briefs, 2013(Research
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL32572 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons September 9, 2004 Amy F. Woolf Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete
More informationUnited States Air Force and Military Aircraft
United States Air Force and Military Aircraft US Air Force Mission: Defend the United States through the control and exploitation of air and space. Aim: air dominance United States Air Force Functions:
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 11.801 10.862
More information