Headquarters U. S. Air Force. The Air Force s Perspective
|
|
|
- Delilah George
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e The Air Force s Perspective Mr. Jack Manclark Phone: or DSN John.Manclark@pentagon.af.mil NDIA, Charlotte, NC, 9 Mar 05
2 Overview Requirements and Test Training Test Fleet T&E Infrastructure Range Requirements PBD 703: Direct Funding PBD 703: NFAC Seamless Verification Spiral to War 2
3 Requirements and Test Training Today Limited formal requirements training currently available Limited formal training for some key AF test domains Space Vehicles UAVs Weapons Sensors, EW, IO, and C4ISR Integrated systems and systems of systems Available training is stovepiped and fragmented No centralized or coordinated oversight of training No formal process for reviewing training requirements 3
4 Requirements and Test Training A Better Way Requirements and Test Institute B A S I C Rqmnts Air Space MAJCOM and SPO Staffs (Requirements) S K I L L S IO Weapons EW C4ISR Test Squadrons Air Space Info Ops Weapons C4ISR EW 4
5 Test Fleet Fleet representative A/C essential to meaningful testing Current test fleet composition Limited fleet representative A/C (54%) Organic fleet largely made up of aging A/C Significant number of borrowed A/C The future of the AF test fleet a new paradigm Program for A/C to support test requirements (F/A-22) Borrow A/C from depot for follow-on testing (RQ-4) Borrow A/C from field for follow-on testing (C-130) 5
6 Test Support Fleet A/C must be fleet representative for supportability Current test support fleet Limited fleet representative A/C (40%) F-16 Coral Phoenix only supportable for 5-7 years T-38 A/B not supportable long-term C-12 no GPS The future of the AF test support fleet? Next generation technology will drive support fleet needs Upgrade / replace aging test support A/C A/C must be fleet representative to keep costs in line 6
7 Test / Test Support Fleet Challenges on the horizon will require a new paradigm AF must include test fleet in force structure programming CAF / MAF commitment needed for continued success 7
8 T&E Infrastructure R&D Labs Computers Modeling & Sim Subsystem Ground Test Bench Test Propulsion Cells Ground Test Software Labs Wind Tunnels Climatic Labs Computers Modeling & Sim Subsystem Integration Anechoic Chamber Radar Measures Open Air Ranges Instrumentation Telemetry Ground Control Ground Test Climatic Labs Computers Modeling & Sim System Function Threat Sim Targets Weapons Ranges EW Ranges Open Air Ranges Instrumentation Telemetry Ground Control Computers Modeling & Sim Battlespace Integration Bandwidth Net-centric Ranges Live-Virtual-Const (LVC) Simulation Operational Threat Matrix Targets Weapons Ranges EW Ranges Open Air Ranges Instrumentation Telemetry Ground Control Computers Modeling & Sim 8
9 T&E Infrastructure T&E requires costly / specialized infrastructure Facilities Airfield pavements Mission support and training facilities Unique structures to house specialized equipment Equipment Wind tunnels Climatic and anechoic chambers Simulators and high-powered computers 9
10 T&E Infrastructure Challenges Numerous studies conclude recap rate is inadequate Warfighting technology evolving more rapidly then ever AF recap standard is 67 years T&E may require 36-year recap Existing infrastructure has limitations Large footprint weapons (DE, super- / hypersonics, etc ) Larger bandwidth requirements Systems of systems Next wave of new systems will only add to the stress Changes to T&E programming rules Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 10
11 T&E Infrastructure Protecting T&E funding for Indirect costs is essential Plan for current / future systems (space / hyper-sonics / DE) BRAC may drive consolidation and present opportunities 11
12 Range Requirements Future Weapons Gravity Glide Powered Hypersonic Standoff Ranges MILES s 1000s 12
13 Range Requirements Weapon Footprint JASSM WHITE SANDS UTTR CHINA LAKE SDB SDB SDB SDB (w/out FTS) 30 kft, 0.8 M SDB NELLIS JASSM (w/fts) Medium Altitude, 0.7M DoD Land EDWARDS SDB SDB EGLIN DoD Airspace 13
14 Range Requirement Resolution Immediate Need Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) AFMC Studying Alternatives Defining Requirement Analyzing Alternatives Hq AF will staff proposed solution 14
15 PBD 703: Direct Funding FY2003 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) changes T&E charging policies. Starting with FY2006, institutional and overhead costs for Major Range and Test Facility Bases (MTRFB) transferred from customer to institutional T&E accounts. Approximately $270M transferred from customer to institutional accounts in FY06. FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 $277M $287M $297M $307M $318M 15
16 PBD 703: National Full-Scale Aerodynamic Complex (NFAC) The NFAC is comprised of two wind tunnels (40 x80 and 80 x120 ) at NASA Ames Research Center, CA. NASA mothballed NFAC in FY 04. PBD 703 provided FY funds for the AF to initiate upgrades, restore the NFAC to full operational capability in FY 07, and sustain the facility thereafter. Funding profile is: FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 TOTAL $5.0 $14.0 $16.0 $14.0 $11.0 $11.0 $11.0 Current Status: AFMC will execute NFAC reactivation through AEDC. Congressional new start notification is in coordination. Initial planning discussions between AEDC and Ames are ongoing. 16
17 Seamless Verification Philosophy Full collaboration between AF Requirements-Test-Acquisition Requirements written by user, testers and acquirers--together Capabilities-focused, realistic and testable Testers assume higher level of responsibility for success DT develops technology/reduces risk demo system performance OT responsible for vectoring program to a successful IOT&E IOT&E Becomes a capstone graduation event Fully Integrated T&E more than just Combined DT/OT All T&E stakeholders (CT, DT, OT) integrate efforts from Day 1 More DT/OT integration = blurring of traditional lines 17
18 Spiral to War Test Requirements vs Warfighter Needs A Prudent Balance Global Hawk Predator Sniper/Lightning JDAM Mk 82 18
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 752.328 704.475 722.071-722.071 701.000 702.979 716.873 725.979
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Major T&E Investment. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 Air Force Page 1 of 12 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2019 OCO. FY 2019 Base
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2019 Navy : February 2018 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2020
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 92.713 23.188 31.064 46.007-46.007
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #98
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #98 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 33.968
AVIONICS CYBER TEST AND EVALUATION
AVIONICS CYBER TEST AND EVALUATION Joseph Nichols, PhD Technical Advisor for Flight Test and Evaluation Air Force Test Center Edwards AFB CA joseph.nichols.13@us.af.mil 1 Defining avionics cyber testing
Small Diameter Bomb Increment I (SDB I) Precision Strike Association Annual Program Review
Increment I (SDB I) Precision Strike Association Annual Program Review 19 April 2006 Col Dick Justice Commander, Miniature Munitions Systems Group richard.justice@eglin.af.mil 1 2 SDB Increment I GBU 39/B,
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001
PE NUMBER: 0605807F PE TITLE: Test and Evaluation Support BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001 PE NUMBER AND TITLE 06 - Management and Support 0605807F Test and
Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010
Building Next Generation Range Capabilities Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010 1 Test Resource Management Center (TRMC)
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003
COST ($ in Thousands) FY 2002 Actual FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Cost to Complete Total Cost 0191 Initial Operational Test & Eval 32,550 26,483 34,646 26,896 27,866 28,399 33,656
Air Force Research Laboratory
Air Force Research Laboratory Innovation in the Weapons Enterprise November 2013 Integrity Service Excellence Major General Thomas J. Masiello Commander Air Force Research Laboratory AFRL Mission Better
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element 966.537 66.374 29.083 54.838 0.000 54.838 47.369
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 17.754 16.197 13.610-13.610 14.019
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 242.669 68.656 70.614 82.195-82.195
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 685 Boeing Platform Integration Total Program Cost (TY$): $180M Data Link Solutions FDL Terminal Average
MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018
MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018 Overview Strategic Environment FY19 Budget Priorities FY19 Budget Request FY19 by Appropriation Final Thoughts I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0604759F PE TITLE: Major T&E Investment Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 06 RDT&E Management Support 0604759F Major T&E Investment Cost ($ in
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION PRESENTED TO: NAVAIR SMALL BUSINESS AVIATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 1 RDML STEVE EASTBURG ASSISTANT
Testing at the Speed of Need
Aerospace Operational Support Group Testing at the Speed of Need Australia s Test and Experimentation: Future Operations and Improvement Initiatives Air Commodore Noel Derwort, CSC, ADC Commander AOSG
Spectrum of Testing. OPERATIONAL testing for the warfighter in the representative BATTLESPACE ENVIRONMENT
Vision Statement To be the best operational test agency, recognized for impartial, accurate, and timely contributions that continuously improve America s warfighting capability. 2 Mission Statement We
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)
PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities
34 th Annual International Test and Evaluation Symposium T&E in a Time of Risk and Change Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities John Auborn, NAVAIR Paola Pringle, NAVAIR This Presentation
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 109.887 133.105 148.297-148.297
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: WEATHER SERVICE. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Program Element 45.918 33.291 32.373 0.000
EW Modeling and Simulation: Meeting the Challenge
EW Modeling and Simulation: Meeting the Challenge Dr. George Kailiwai III Director, Resources and Assessment (J8) United States Pacific Command July 2009 Rio Hotel, Las Vegas, Nevada Today s EW Threat
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007
PE NUMBER: 27133F PE TITLE: F-16 SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 27 7 Operational System Development 27133F F-16 SQUADRONS ($ in Millions) 2671 Total Program Element (PE)
Air Force Test Center Strategic Plan 2016
Air Force Test Center Strategic Plan 2016 David Harris Major General, USAF Commander 1 Clockwise from top left: 1. AEDC ASTF marks 30 years; 2. Eglin 40FLTS F-16 missile test; 3. F-35s record 76 sorties
F-35 Weapon System Overview
F-35 Weapon System Overview Doug Hayward Deputy Director F-35 Vehicle Systems Lockheed Martin Aeronautics 2010 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: A. Approved for public release;
The DoD T&E/S&T Program
The DoD T&E/S&T Program George Rumford Program Manager Test Resource Management Center Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology Program (TRMC, T&E/S&T) NDIA 11 TH Annual Science & Engineering Technology
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Presented to the National Defense Industrial Association (DoD Technology Exposition) Mr. Jim Engle Deputy Assistant Secretary (Science, Technology & Engineering) 6 March 2003
Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association
Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: 121 124 Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Enhancing Operational Realism in Test & Evaluation Ernest Seglie, Ph.D. Office of the
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Air Armament Center Air Force Precision Strike Weapons Development Status Richard D. Justice, Colonel, USAF Commander, 918 th Armament Systems Group Air Armament Center, Eglin AFB, FL I n t e g r i t y
Air Force Flight Test Center
Air Force Flight Test Center We conduct and support the research, development, test and evaluation of aerospace systems from concept to combat Making DT&E and Modeling & Simulation Better Partners Dr.
I n t r o d u c t i o n
The President and the Congress have given me the opportunity to serve as Director, Operational Test and Evaluation for these last two and a half years. I have been honored and humbled to serve in this
America s Air Force Always There FY18 President s Budget Request
Maj Gen Martin 23 May 2017 America s Air Force Always There President s Budget Request Bottom Line Upfront For 70 years, American Airmen have provided unmatched Global Vigilance, Global Reach, and Global
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 0.000 24.500 23.016-23.016 25.350 26.026
WARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY
5th Annual Testing and Training Symposium & Exhibition: Partnering In National Defense at Home and Abroad WARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY Presented by Ted Wheeler & Mark Rindler Special
T&E in a Time of Risk and Change
Enhancing our Competitive Edge: T&E in a Time of Risk and Change Maj Gen Matt Zap Molloy Commander, Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center Albuquerque, NM Distribution A: Approved for public
Flight Controlled Mortar FCMortar
FCMortar NDIA Guns & Missile Systems Conference 6-10 April 2009 Luke Steelman, Program Manager Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division Precision & Advanced Systems Branch, Code G33 (540) 653-4984
ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield
Headquarters Air Combat Command ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield Col Tom Wozniak ACC/A8C 25 July 2006 This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Overview Tactical Level Programs TTNT, TACP,
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 50 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2012 Ms.
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) DATE MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE 1160427BB Mission Training and Preparation
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2018 Base FY 2018 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: Navy : May 2017 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 Base PE 65863N: RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support OCO Total FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 Navy Page
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #94
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. June 6, 2003
BRAC 2005 Issues Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group June 6, 2003 1 Purpose Approve interim selection criteria Approve assignment of Defense Agencies to JCSGs Approve development of BRAC funding
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Complete Program Element - 130.376 166.297 132.795 0.000
DOT&E Initiatives from the Middle
Dugway Proving Ground DOT&E Initiatives from the Middle NDIA Test & Evaluation Conference Darren Jolley March 12-15, 2012 The Bun Holds Us Together, But Where s The Beef? DOT&E, DUSA-TE and JRO-CBRND OTA
Precision Strike Winter Roundtable
Create and Deliver Superior Products Through Innovative Minds Precision Strike Winter Roundtable Long Range Strike Weapons Frank Cappuccio, February 1, 2007 An Industry Perspective 1. What LRS Capabilities
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17 Distribution Statement A Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. File: NAVAIR Brief 1 Weapons Systems Integration and
Flight Controlled Mortar (FCMortar) for Precision Urban Mortar Attack (PUMA)
1 Distribution Statement A (FCMortar) for Precision Urban Mortar Attack (PUMA) NDIA Fuze Conference 19-21 May 2009 Luke Steelman, Program Manager Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division Precision
USAF/Industry Partnership
Headquarters U.S. Air Force USAF/Industry Partnership Brig Gen Mike Worden Director of Operational Plans and Joint Matters 2 June 2005 1 Changing Environment: Then, Now, and Tomorrow High National Strategic
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Spacelift Range System
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line Item #197 To Program Element 10.973
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 Base PE 65864N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 212 OCO FY 212 Total FY 213 FY 214 FY
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #147
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference
9 th Annual Disruptive Conference Navy IAMD Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. (12/05/2012). This Brief is provided for Information Only and does not constitute
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Initial Operational Test & Evaluation FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Cost Program Element 25.368 20.665 17.767-17.767
Joint Terminal Control Training & Rehearsal System (JTC TRS)
Joint Terminal Control Training & Rehearsal System (JTC TRS) Lt Col Dan Hodgkiss 677 AESG/TO 937 255 3801 daniel.hodgkiss@wpafb.af.mil Date: 15 May 2007 Government disclaimer: all information is provided
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 27448F PE TITLE: C2ISR Tactical Data Link Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification 27448F C2ISR Tactical Data Link 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Total Actual Complete Total Program Element (PE) Cost
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP)
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP) JDEP Strategy Final Report Dr. Judith S. Dahmann John Tindall The MITRE Corporation March 2001 March 2001 Table of Contents page Executive Summary 1 Introduction
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY1999 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY2005 to Army Joint STARS (TIARA) 5316 25676 17898 17713 12833 14372 11527 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Justification: The
NGAUS Legislative Workshop. Col Kevin Stubby Campbell Director, Plans & Requirements NGB/A5/8/9 13 Feb 2018
NGAUS Legislative Workshop Col Kevin Stubby Campbell Director, Plans & Requirements NGB/A5/8/9 13 Feb 2018 NGB/A5 Mission Customer = The field / Engineers = Aircraft Program Offices NGB/A5 Mission Rapidly
Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference
Unmanned Aircraft Builders Conference, Inc 2008 Annual Conference 21-23 September 2008 Doug Fronius Director, Tactical Unmanned IPT Program Manager, VTUAV Navy Fire Scout Northrop Grumman Corporation Northrop
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($
Industry Day RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division. 23 May 2012
Industry Day 2012 Presented by: 23 May 2012 RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; 1 distribution is unlimited. Strategic
Briefing for Industry
Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico Briefing for Industry Mr. Quentin Saulter Naval Representative High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office August 18, 2015 DISTRIBUTION D: Distribution
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
Time Critical Targeting
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Time Critical Targeting Brig Gen Jim Morehouse Director of Command & Control DCS, Air & Space Operations 1 Definition Performance Threshold The Kill Chain Closing the Seams
PROVIDING THE WARFIGHTER S EDGE
MISSION OVERVIEW BRIEF Brig Gen Michael Schmidt PEO, Fighters and Bombers PROVIDING THE WARFIGHTER S EDGE Current as of 5 Apr 16 Air Force Materiel Command Center Mission Areas Continue to Strengthen AFMC
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 19.165 18.599 22.654-22.654 24.342 24.422 24.571 25.715 Continuing
Joint Gulf Range: A Venue for Testing, Training, & Experimentation
Joint Gulf Range: A Venue for Testing, Training, & Experimentation Camp Beauregard Future Mission Camp Shelby TC Fort Rucker Whiting NAS Ft Polk/JRTC Keesler AFB Pensacola NAS Eglin AFB Coastal Systems
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #96
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 Total FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 8.916 10.476 11.529 0.000 11.529 11.985
PROVIDING THE WARFIGHTER S
AFLCMC HOT TOPICS Lt Gen JT Thompson Commander, AFLCMC PROVIDING THE WARFIGHTER S EDGE Overview AFLCMC mission Product Support (PS) & hot topics Where We re Headed Aircraft Structural Integrity Program
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
Oversight of DoD Test and Evaluation (T&E) Resources
Oversight of DoD Test and Evaluation (T&E) Resources Topics Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) Test Range Issues/Concerns Summary 2 Test Resource Management
GAO. ELECTRONIC COMBAT Consolidation Master Plan Does Not Appear to Be Cost-Effective. Report to Congressional Requesters
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters July 1997 ELECTRONIC COMBAT Consolidation Master Plan Does Not Appear to Be Cost-Effective GAO/NSIAD-97-10 GAO United States
Air-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II Success and Challenges of Distributed Testing Mr. Timothy Menke Technical Director
WHITE PAPER AIR FORCE ORGANIZATIONAL PRINCIPLES
DCN: 1911 WHITE PAPER AIR FORCE ORGANIZATIONAL PRINCIPLES The Air Force (AF) operates as part of a joint, inter-agency team by providing air and space power. Defined through operating concepts, these capabilities
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013