Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating."

Dinah Roberts
5 years ago
Views:

1 Concept Development & Experimentation COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating Captain Andy Baan

2 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JUN REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED to TITLE AND SUBTITLE COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating (Briefing Charts) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) NATO,Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic,7857 Blandy Road Suite 100,Norfolk,VA, PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 23 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

3 TWO ANTENNAE

4 Success Wait. We should not have to answer these questions! We have never been asked for this information before. - AFNORTH participant

5 Purpose of EBO CCA supports EBO Mission is accomplished when behavior is shaped so that intentions are in compliance

6 Wellington Modern Warfare History Peace Support Operations, COM is the Shooter. The COM determines the message Must know everything COM must ensure the message is consistent up and down the chain C2CC s Purpose

7 C2CC Internal CC System External CC System Secure perimeter P1 P2 f P1 P2 f Division Commander Brigade Commander Theater Commander Brigade Commander Division Commander Brigade Commander Regional Agency Regional Agency Regional Agency Local Agency Local Agency Local Agency National Agency National Agency National Agency Local Agency Local Agency Local Agency Regional Agency Regional Agency Regional Agency Local Agency Local Agency Local Agency

8 CCA PROCESS

9 Six Phases of an Interactive Episode Scene-setting Build-up If positions agree, then Collaboration, Decision If positions disagree, then Confrontation then Decision Implementation

11 Example Options Board showing Confrontation Tug of War for Confrontation Options Board showing Collaboration Tug of War for Collaboration

12 PALESTINIANS PI P+A f I stop terrorism recognize/accept Israel ARAB STATES fund terrorism recognize/accept Israel ISRAEL accept viable Palestinian state raid/suppress Palestinians accept minimal Palestinian state

13 P/A do Terror P/A do Terror Palestinian/Arab position = Palestinian state Israel f = Terror and suppression Palestinians Arabs Israeli position = Israeli domination without terrorism Israel blocks Palestinian state

14 PI a r(p+a) r(i) PALESTINIANS stop terrorism recognize/accept Israel ARAB STATES fund terrorism recognize/accept Israel ISRAEL negotiate Palestinian state progressively abandon settlements expand settlements raid/suppress West Bank/Gaza

15 r(p+a) = Terror, no Palestinian State Palestinians and Arabs return to terrorism and cease to recognize Israel Agreement = Palestinian state and peace Israel fails to negotiate Palestinian state or abandon settlements r(i) = Terror, no Palestinian State

16 AFNORTH Trial Part of Allied Action 03 Planning Process Participants included 3-star General, staff including POLAD, LEGAL, CIMIC Training session preceded work Three models

17 Friends Foes Neutrals Parties We Analyzed All three are required to agree to achieve compliance

18 AFNORTH Trial Outcomes Success- Demonstrated need to create national/political problems as injects Success- Demonstrated issues overlap Success- Demonstrated the benefit of COM s participation, an intention of C2CC

19 Insights Gained Don t be too ambitious Adequate training of facilitator and staff is important to get the most benefit New processes need to be injected into the training process all along the career path i.e. difficult to do training and immediately use system all at one

20 The Future Working with JFCOM Appears that C2CC and ONA are mutually reinforcing Additional experiments Ongoing analysis Software and training manuals

21 Legend Collaborative environment Model repository C2CC CCA Formal analysis Decisive Points Immersive Briefing Critical Thinking Blue View Green View Red View Wargaming Non-CCA Issues (e.g. Logistics, Targeting) Systems Modeling (Causal Mapping) Desired Effects Plans (Resources to Effects) Formal analysis Formal analysis

22 QUESTIONS Captain Andy Baan

23 PSO Reminders COM needs to be fully informed and engaged Goal is to change intention of parties because mission does not end until parties realize that their desired end-state is the international community s proclaimed end-state

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP) Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense 2004 by Carnegie Mellon University page 1 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No.