WikiLeaks Document Release
|
|
- Garey Jackson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report Conventional Arms Transfers to Latin America: U.S. Policy Richard Grimmett, Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division August 5, 1997 Abstract. This report provides background on United States policy regarding conventional arms transfers to Latin America. It focuses on the development of U.S. policy toward arms sales and transfers to Latin America, and the debate over modifying existing policy and practices regarding such sales and transfers to countries in this region.
2 F CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Conventional Arms Transfers to Latin America: U.S. Policy Updated August 5, 1997 Richard F. Grimmett Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress
3 ABSTRACT This report provides background on United States policy regarding conventional arms transfers to Latin America. It focuses on the development of U.S. policy toward arms sales and transfers to Latin America, and the debate over modifying existing policy and practices regarding such sales and transfers to countries in this region. It will only be updated if there is a significant change in U.S. policy or practices regarding arms transfers to this region.
4 Conventional Arms Transfers to Latin America: U.S. Policy Summary This report provides background on United States policy regarding conventional arms transfers to Latin America. It focuses on the development of U.S. policy toward arms sales and transfers to Latin America, and the debate over modifying existing policy and practices regarding such sales and transfers to countries in this region. United States policy on arms transfers to Latin America, as implemented, has gone through various modifications over the last forty years. However, there has always been some reluctance to provide large quantities of arms to this region. And, there has been a fundamental interest in not making sales or transfers of highly advanced weapons systems, such as combat fighter aircraft, that could undermine regional military balances or stimulate an arms race. While there has been no generic "ban" on arms transfers to Latin American nations, there have been specific legislative controls and executive branch practices applied to this region that have restricted the flow of American weaponry into it. Recently, United States arms transfer practices regarding Latin America were clarified by the Clinton Administration, although they remain the subject of a debate over what approach the United States should follow. A review of the development of U.S. policy and practices toward arms transfers to this region follows to provide a context for understanding recent actions. Some in Congress have expressed concern that the United States might stimulate an avoidable arms race in Latin America should it permit American defense firms to sell highly advanced weapons systems to this region. They have expressed particular concern with the prospect that the United States might sell very sophisticated combat fighter aircraft and the prospect that this would divert scarce financial resources that could be better spent in other ways. Others argue that it is appropriate for the United States to assist in the modernization of Latin American military forces, especially in light of the growth of democratic institutions there, and the practical need some nations have to replace obsolescent military equipment. Chile is the most likely candidate for a sale that would give tangible effect to the Clinton Administration's approach to U.S. arms sales to Latin America. Chile is considering the purchase of a modern combat fighter to upgrade its Air Force. In late March 1997, the Clinton Administration gave the U.S. companies who build the F-16 and F-18 fighters permission to provide technical data regarding these aircraft to the Chilean government, while noting that just because it has permitted U.S. defense companies to compete for the Chilean aircraft sale does not necessarily mean that it would approve a sale request from Chile's government. If and when Chile should choose to request the sale of an American fighter aircraft, the Clinton Administration would, at that point, have to agree to make such a sale or issue an export license for a commercial sale, and then justify that sale to Congress in accordance with the terms of the Arms Export Control Act. Congress, in turn, would have the opportunity to disapprove that sale by enactment of a joint resolution, should it choose to do so.
5 Contents Background...1 Congressional Restrictions on Arms Transfers to Latin America...1 U.S. Arms Sales Policy Toward Latin America Before President Carter's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Latin America.. 4 President Reagan's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Latin America. 5 President Clinton's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Latin America 6 Current Debate Over U.S. Arms Sales Policy and Latin America...7 Appendix...10
6 Conventional Arms Transfers to Latin America: U.S. Policy Background United States policy on arms transfers to Latin America, as implemented, has gone through various modifications over the last forty years. However, there has always been some reluctance to provide large quantities of arms to this region. And, there has been a fundamental interest in not making sales or transfers of highly advanced weapons systems, such as combat fighter aircraft, that could undermine regional military balances or stimulate an arms race. While there has been no generic "ban" on arms transfers to Latin American nations, there have been specific legislative controls and executive branch practices applied to this region that have restricted the flow of American weaponry into it. Currently, United States arms transfer practices regarding Latin America are again under review, and have become the subject of a debate over what course the United States should follow in the future. A review of the development of U.S. policy and practices toward arms transfers to this region follows to provide a context for understanding these most recent deliberations. Congressional Restrictions on Arms Transfers to Latin America In the 1960s, Congress determined that arms sales and military assistance to Latin America should be constrained generally during a period when emphasis was being placed on U.S. aid to that region for economic and social development purposes. This was also a period when Congress was concerned about providing advanced weaponry to underdeveloped nations globally, not just to Latin America. These concerns led Congress in 1967 to pass an amendment by Representative Conte to FY1968 foreign assistance funding bill that specifically forbade U.S. financing of the "purchase or acquisition of sophisticated weapons systems, such as missile systems and jet aircraft for military purposes, by or for any underdeveloped country... unless the President determines that such purchase or acquisition of weapons
7 CRS-2 systems are vital to the national security of the United States and reports within 30 days each such determination to the Congress." 1 In 1968, Congress enacted into permanent law a modified version of the Conte amendment as a proviso in section 4 of the Foreign Military Sales Act (FMSA). In this act Congress prohibited U.S. financing or guarantees of sales of "sophisticated weapons systems, such as missile systems and jet aircraft for military purposes to any underdeveloped country," not specifically exempted from this ban, unless the President determined that financing of such sales was "important" to the U.S. national security, and reported this finding to Congress within thirty days. Section 4 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), the successor statute to the FMSA, currently contains the same restrictions on credit or guarantee sales of "sophisticated weapons systems" to "underdeveloped" countries as did the 1968 Foreign Military Sales Act. 2 Section 33 of the Foreign Military Sales Act of 1968 also placed an overall ceiling of $75 million on the amount of cash, credit or guaranteed arms sales that could be made to "Latin American" countries in FY1969. The President was permitted to waive these limitations should he determine that doing so is "important to the security of the United States," and "promptly" report this to the Speaker of the House and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. This overall dollar ceiling on Latin American arms sales was raised to $150 million by In 1974 it was repealed in its entirety by the Foreign Assistance Act of Although the overall dollar ceilings on arms sales levels to Latin America were eliminated in 1974, Congress did enact prohibitions on the sale or transfer of military equipment to specific Latin American nations -- notably Chile and Argentina -- due to concerns over actions taken by their governments, in particular human rights abuse of their citizens. The ban on military aid and arms sales to Chile was first enacted in 1974, while the one for Argentina was enacted in This amendment explicitly excluded from its restrictions Greece, Turkey, Iran, Israel, the Republic of China, the Philippines, and [South] Korea. See Title I, Military Assistance, of the Foreign Assistance and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1968, P.L See Section 4 of P.L The 1968 Foreign Military Sales Act exempted Greece, Turkey, Iran, Israel, the Republic of China, the Philippines and [South] Korea from this restriction as does the current Arms Export Control Act. 3 See P.L Section 25 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1974, P.L , forbade the provision of any military assistance, cash or credit arms sales, loan guarantees, or excess defense articles transfers to Chile in FY1975. Section 404 of the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976, P.L , continued limitations on military assistance, arms sales and sales credits for Chile. Section 620B of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as added in 1978 by P.L and amended by P.L prohibited, among other things, the furnishing to Argentina of grant military assistance, and the extension of credits, sales, or export licenses under the Arms Export Control Act after September 30, The prohibitions on U.S. assistance and sales to Argentina were repealed by Congress in The limitations on military assistance and arms sales to Chile were repealed in 1990 (continued...)
8 CRS-3 During the 1960s and 1970s, the United States was a key supplier of arms to Latin American countries. Nonetheless, other major arms exporters, including the Soviet Union, and major West European nations also sold notable amounts of weapons to this region. During the period from , the value of all arms deliveries to all Latin American nations was $2.768 billion, or an average of $277 million a year, according to the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. The principal suppliers of arms to Latin America from the period before President Jimmy Carter's arms transfer policy fully took effect were: the Soviet Union (delivering $1.03 billion in weaponry to two nations Cuba and Peru), the United States ($653 million), the United Kingdom ($565 million), and France ($475 million). 5 U.S. Arms Sales Policy Toward Latin America Before 1977 The U. S. limitations on the sale or transfer of advanced military equipment to Latin America, especially on combat aircraft, noted above, led to friction with prospective Latin American customers and resulted in other suppliers making sales that the United States refused to make on policy grounds. In the mid-to-late 1960s, the United States refused to sell combat aircraft more advanced than the A-4B light attack aircraft, and the Korean War era F-86 fighter. Some Latin American nations sought the F-5 light jet fighter, but the United States was not prepared to sell it until Peru responded to a U.S. rejection of its request to buy F-5s by purchasing Mirage 5 fighters from France, thereby becoming in 1969 the first Latin American nation to acquire supersonic fighter aircraft. Subsequently, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela also obtained Mirage III and Mirage 5 fighters from France. In the early 1970s the U.S. F-5 fighter became available for sale to Latin America on a cash basis. In 1973, President Nixon waived the restrictions on credit sales to the region to enable Latin American states to purchase the F-5. Brazil purchased 42 F-5Es on credit terms. Chile bought 18 F-5Es for cash. Peru in 1976 chose not to seek U.S. F-5 aircraft. Instead Peru purchased Su-22 supersonic fighter bombers from the Soviet Union, thereby introducing a new level of military capability into the region. 6 4 (...continued) by P.L , conditioned on a Presidential certification specifying certain things. The requisite certification was made on September 30, 1990, in Public Notice 1333 by the Secretary of State on behalf of the President. 5 U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, , 1977, p. 80. U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, , October 1979, p Details regarding arms sales and transfers to Latin America in the 1960s and 1970s are found in Luigi, Einaudi, et. Al. Arms Transfers to Latin America: Toward a Policy of Mutual Respect. Rand Corporation, Report R-1173-DOS, June 1973, pp. 1-21; Ronfeldt, David and Caesar Sereseres, U.S. Arms Transfers, Diplomacy, and Security in Latin America and Beyond. Rand Corporation, Rand Paper P-6005, October 1977, pp Also see Sorley, Lewis, Arms Transfers under Nixon: A Policy Analysis. The University of Kentucky Press, 1983, pp and Foreign Military Markets. Latin America & Caribbean. 1996/1997 Forecast International/DMS. Newtown, Connecticut.
9 CRS-4 U.S. missile systems were considered to be too advanced to be available for sale to Latin America in the 1960s and early 1970s, so West Europe, Israel and Australia became primary sources for these weapons. Because the United States, during this period, did not have cost competitive surplus ground and naval equipment to sell to Latin America, European nations became the leading source of these types of weapons in the region. Great Britain, Italy and West Germany supplied new destroyers, guided-missile frigates, submarines and tanks. In 1973, Peru purchased T-55 medium tanks from the Soviet Union, as well as radar-controlled anti-aircraft guns and long-range artillery. President Carter's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Latin America By the time of President Carter's election in 1976, Congress had already passed legislation that placed restrictions on sales or transfers of weapons to countries determined to be engaged in systematic violations of human rights. The Carter Conventional Arms Transfer Policy directive (PDD-13), publicly announced on May 19, 1977, noted that it would seek to advance respect for human rights in countries that received U.S. military aid, and would assess the economic impact of arms transfers to less developed nations receiving U.S. economic assistance. The Carter policy directive reflected the view that conventional arms transfers in general, except for those to major allies, needed to be restrained. The Carter policy stated that arms transfers would be viewed as "an exceptional foreign policy implement, to be used only where it can be clearly demonstrated that the transfer contributes to our national security interests." It also noted that "the burden of persuasion will be on those who favor a particular arms sale, rather than those who oppose it." It stated that the United States would not be the "first supplier to introduce into a region newly-developed, advanced weapons systems which could create a new or significantly higher combat capability." Further, the policy directive set in motion a revision of U.S. arms sales regulations that required authorization by the State Department before agents of the U.S. or private manufacturers could take actions to promote the sale of U.S. armaments abroad. And, U.S. embassies and military representatives abroad were forbidden from promoting the sale of U.S. weapons. 7 It is the language of the Carter arms transfer policy directive on conventional arms transfers that has given the impression that strong restrictions on U.S. transfers to Latin America originated with his Administration. Yet, as noted above, Congress had already taken direct legislative action to limit U.S. sales to this region for at least a decade. Once in office, Carter did follow through with the key elements of his policy directive by refusing to sell any combat fighter aircraft to Latin America more advanced than the A-4 and the F-5. He also denied permission for Israel to sell its Kfir fighter aircraft to Ecuador in July 1977, an action he was able to take because 7 Statement on Conventional Arms Transfer Policy, issued by President Jimmy Carter, May 19, 1977.
10 CRS-5 the Kfir was powered by the U.S.-origin General Electric J-79 engine. 8 The Carter Administration's human rights policy had an important effect on overall levels of Latin American arms purchases from the United States. Some nations such as Brazil and Argentina, indicated that they did not appreciate U.S. criticism of their human rights records, or the linking of such records to levels of military assistance or credits for purchasing arms. U.S. government arms sales figures for the Carter years reflect a general decline in the total value of weapons purchased by all of Latin America from the United States during FY1977-FY President Reagan's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Latin America President Ronald Reagan's Administration took a different position from President Carter on arms transfer policy generally as well as on arms transfers to Latin America. On July 9, 1981, President Reagan publicly announced his Presidential directive on Conventional Arms Transfer policy, which explicitly superseded the May 1977 Carter policy directive on the subject. 10 The Reagan policy directive stated that the transfer of conventional arms and defense articles was "an essential element of its global defense posture and an indispensable component of its foreign policy." It noted that the United States would evaluate arms transfer requests "primarily in terms of their net contribution to enhanced deterrence and defense." In making decisions to transfer arms a "broad range of factors" would be taken into account, including: "whether the transfer is consistent with United States interests in maintaining stability within regions where friends of the United States may have differing objectives;... whether the proposed equipment transfer can be absorbed by the recipient without overburdening its military support system or financial resources; and whether any detrimental effects of the transfer are more than counterbalanced by positive contributions to United States interests and objectives." The Reagan directive stipulated that all arms transfer requests would be considered "on a case-by-case basis," and that those involving "coproduction, or the transfer of sensitive or advanced technology" would receive "special scrutiny." At the same time, the Reagan directive removed the Carter prohibition on U.S. government representatives overseas providing assistance to U.S. firms that had obtained licenses to market U.S. defense items abroad. During the Reagan Administration the United States made its first sale to Latin America of a highly advanced, supersonic combat fighter aircraft. This sale of 24 F- 16 fighters to Venezuela was proposed on January 13, 1982 and cleared 8 Under U.S. law, all third-country retransfers of U.S.-origin military equipment and components much receive the prior approval of the United States before they can be made. 9 Total U.S. arms sales agreements with Latin America fell each year from a high of $83.3 million in FY1977 to a low of $24.9 million in FY1980. U.S. Department of Defense. Defense Security Assistance Agency. Fiscal Year series. 10 Announcement Concerning a Presidential Directive on United States Conventional Arms Transfer Policy released by the White House on July 9, This announcement stated that President Reagan signed the new Presidential Directive on July 8, 1981.
11 CRS-6 congressional review a month later. The principal justifications for the sale cited by Administration witnesses were the Cuban military buildup, including acquisition of MiG-23 fighters, Venezuela's measured decision to update its air force, Venezuela's important role as a force for stability in the region, and the fact that its oil revenues gave it the requisite funds to pay for the F-16 fighters. 11 The F-16 sale to Venezuela was the single largest sale of any major U.S. weapons system to Latin America during the Reagan Administration, and was larger than any single arms sale to that region made subsequently by the Bush Administration. From FY1981 through FY1992, the total of U.S. government arms sales to Latin American was $3.32 billion or an average of about $276.8 million a year. Most of the weapons sold in the region were of a less advanced character, and the largest sales totals were to nations such as El Salvador, considered a strong anti-communist ally facing an internal insurgency. The highest arms sales total for any year to the region was in FY $523.9 million. Of this FY1982 total, $456 million were for sales to Venezuela, the largest part of this figure was for the F-16 aircraft. 12 President Clinton's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy and Latin America The Reagan Conventional Arms Transfer Policy directive was not modified during the Administration of President George Bush. Thus, the July 1981 Reagan directive was the basis for U.S. policy until it was replaced on February 17, 1995, when, after months of internal debate, President Clinton released details of his directive on Conventional Arms Transfer Policy (PDD-34). As outlined, the Clinton directive codified an approach toward arms transfers that had guided the Clinton Administration's decisions since the President took office. Under the Clinton policy directive, the United States continues to view transfers of conventional arms as a legitimate instrument of U.S. foreign policy when they enable the United States to help friends and allies deter aggression, promote regional security and increase interoperability of U.S. forces and allied forces. 13 President Clinton's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy represents a public articulation of a policy approach that has governed United States arms transfers at least since the Reagan Administration. Given what the Administration believes are the multiple U.S. interests involved in each arms transfer determination, decisions will continue to be made on a "case-by-case" basis. The guidelines set out in the policy are sufficiently broad so as to permit most U.S. sales on the grounds of advancing the national interest. The policy guidelines do not reflect more tightly drawn criteria for U.S. arms transfers such as a strict "code of conduct" test that potential arms recipients would have to meet under a proposal by some congressional 11 See U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Proposed Sale of F-16's to Venezuela. Hearing. 97 th Cong., 2 nd. Sess., February 5, 1982, pp U.S. Department of Defense. Defense Security Assistance Agency. Fiscal Year Series. 13 For a detailed analysis and text of key documents related to President Clinton's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy see CRS Report , Conventional Arms Transfers: President Clinton's Policy Directive, by Richard F. Grimmett, May 17, 1995.
12 CRS-7 arms control advocates. Nor do they explicitly single out any region of the world for special policy treatment. Although the Administration has emphasized that its decisions on arms transfers will not be driven by commercial considerations but primarily by national security, the Clinton Conventional Arms Transfer Policy holds that supporting a strong, sustainable American defense-industrial base is a key national security concern, rather than simply a commercial matter. In so doing, the Clinton policy directive has publicly elevated the significance of domestic economic considerations in the arms transfer decision-making process to a higher degree than has been formally the case in previous Administrations. Current Debate Over U.S. Arms Sales Policy and Latin America Although media accounts suggest otherwise, there has been no explicit statutory or policy "ban" on arms sales to Latin American nations, with the exception of Cuba. From FY1993 through FY1996, the United States government sold a total of $789.8 million in arms to Latin America, averaging about $197 million in sales a year. It is true, as outlined above, that since the 1960s, there has been reluctance on the part of the U.S. government to make sales of highly sophisticated combat weapons systems to Latin American countries. And it has been a general practice by the United States government not to seek to sell highly advanced weapons, particularly advanced combat aircraft, to this region. 14 The current debate over prospective Latin American arms sales is a debate over whether or not the United States (or U.S. companies) should sell specific sophisticated weapons to specific nations in Latin America. It is a debate over whether or not the United States should, for example, be willing to sell advanced combat fighter aircraft to nations in the region for the first time since 1982, when the U.S. sold F-16 fighters to Venezuela. The practice of the executive branch, since the Venezuelan sale, has been either to discourage or turn down requests to sell highly advanced combat weapons systems to Latin American nations, especially fighter aircraft. It is this practice, in the implementation of U.S. arms transfer policy guidelines, that has been challenged by U.S. defense industry representatives. It is this practice that was under review by the Clinton Administration for about two years. 15 On August 1, 1997, President Clinton made public his decision to place U.S. arms transfer policy toward Latin America explicitly "on a par with our policy toward 14 U.S. Department of Defense. Defense Security Assistance Agency. Fiscal Year Series. 15 Jane's Defense Weekly, December 4, 1996, p.16; Jane's Defense Weekly, January 15, 1997, p.6; New York Times, January 16, 1997, p.a14; Reuters, January 16, 1997.; Washington Post, January 17, 1997, p. A22; Washington Times, February 12, 1997, p.a1, A8.
13 CRS-8 other regions of the world," through a process of "case-by-case" review of requests for "advanced arms transfers" by nations in that region. The White House statement announcing this approach regarding arms transactions with Latin America is consistent, in its focus and emphasis, with President Clinton's Conventional Arms Transfer Policy Directive of The President's August announcement, while clarifying the policy approach the Administration will follow in evaluating Latin American arms transfers, has not resolved the debate between proponents and opponents of advanced weapons transfers to this region by the United States. 16 Many U.S. exporters of weapons systems argue that past restrictions on sale of advanced weapons sales to Latin America are no longer appropriate considering among other things: the positive changes in the nature of governments in Latin America toward greater democracy in the last decade, their better ability to pay for more costly weapons, and their practical requirement to upgrade key weapons that are at or near obsolescence. These exporters also argue that past history has demonstrated the likelihood that once a Latin American nation has decided to purchase a particular type of weapon, it will do so, whether the United States is willing to sell it to them. The sales in late 1996 of MiG-29 and Su-25 fighter aircraft to Peru by Belarus, has increased the interest of some Latin American countries in obtaining new combat fighter aircraft for themselves, and prompted calls by U.S. defense companies for the Administration to permit U.S. combat fighter sales to such countries. 17 Conventional arms control advocates argue that the United States would foster an expensive and destabilizing arms race in Latin America if it sold comparable or better fighter aircraft than the Peruvian Mig-29s to other nations in the region. They argue that the Peruvian aircraft do not in themselves upset a military balance in the region. It is not certain the planes can be operated effectively or maintained, and thus there is no point in encouraging unnecessary new purchases of expensive fighters by other nations in Latin America merely because of Peru's acquisition. Instead, the United States could attempt to secure the support of all major states in the region to engage in collective self-restraint in the purchases of costly advanced weapons, and place more emphasis on confidence-building measures that could avert wasteful military expenditures. These arms control advocates believe the restraint the United States has displayed in arms sales to the region has served the interests of all nations in the region, and should not be changed just because new market opportunities for American contractors might exist. Chile is the most likely candidate for a sale that would give tangible effect to the Clinton approach to U.S. arms sales to Latin America. Chile is considering the purchase of a modern combat fighter to upgrade its Air Force. In late March 1997, the Clinton Administration gave the U.S. companies who build the F-16 and F White House Statement. Office of the Press Secretary. "U.S. Policy of Arms Transfers to Latin American," August 1, 1997; New York Times, August 2, 1997, p. A1; Washington Post, August 2, 1997, p. A15. For text of White House Statement of August 1, 1997 see Appendix Jane's Defense Weekly, November 27, 1996, p.3; Jane's Defense Weekly, December 18, 1996, p. 9.
14 CRS-9 fighters permission to provide technical data regarding these aircraft to the Chilean government. Similar information is being provided by foreign aircraft exporters as part of an effort to convince Chile's government that their aircraft would best serve Chile's military requirements. 18 The Clinton Administration has noted that just because it has permitted U.S. defense companies to compete for the Chilean aircraft sale does not necessarily mean that it would approve a sale request from Chile's government. If and when Chile should choose to request the sale of an American fighter aircraft, the Clinton Administration would, at that point, have to agree to make such a sale or issue an export license for a commercial sale, and then justify that sale to Congress in accordance with the terms of the Arms Export Control Act. Congress, in turn, would have the opportunity to disapprove that sale by enactment of a joint resolution, should it choose to do so. The same process would apply to any other sale of advanced military equipment to a Latin American nation New York Times, April 4, 1997, p.7; Reuters, April 3, 1997; Jane's Defense Weekly, April 16, 1997, p. 8; 19 For details regarding the congressional arms sales review process see CRS Report , Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process, by Richard F. Grimmett, December 2, 1996.
15 CRS-10 Appendix THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary August 1, 1997 Statement by The Press Secretary U.S. POLICY ON ARMS TRANSFERS TO LATIN AMERICA Following a review of Administration security policy in Latin America, the President has decided to establish a process for case-by-case consideration of requests for advanced arms transfers to countries of that region. This decision puts U.S. arms transfer policy toward Latin America on a par with our policy toward other regions of the world and will be implemented in a way that serves our objective of promoting stability, restraint, and cooperation in the region. In the last decade, Latin America has changed dramatically from a region dominated by coups and military governments to one of democracy and civilian control. Our partnership with countries in the region has reached a new level of maturity, cooperation and dialogue. As their democracies strengthen and their economies grow, the governments of some Latin American countries are now addressing the need to modernize their militaries. They are doing so in the context of greatly improved regional political cooperation and economic integration, and of increased defense cooperation, transparency and confidence-building. It is in America's national security interest to promote stability and security among our neighbors in the hemisphere by engaging with them as equal partners as they modernize and restructure their defense establishments. In considering requests from appropriate civilian authorities for advanced conventional arms, we will take into account our guiding goals of strengthening democracy, including civilian control of the military; focusing resources on needed social and economic development; preventing an arms race; supporting transparency and confidence-building; and ensuring that defense modernization occurs responsibly and with restraint. An interagency group has been formed under the Chairmanship of the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs to address and coordinate our efforts to achieve our security goals for the region, including enhancing regional cooperation and stability, and considering requests for advanced conventional arms transfers.
Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations,
Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1988-1995 By Richard F. Grimmett Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress [The following are extracts from an unclassified report of conventional
More informationConventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations,
Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 2001-2008 Richard F. Grimmett Specialist in International Security September 4, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for
More informationConventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, July 31, 1998
Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1990-1997 July 31, 1998 Richard F. Grimmett Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division CRS This report is prepared annually
More informationConventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, By Richard F. Grimmett Congressional Research Service
Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1996-2003 By Richard F. Grimmett Congressional Research Service [The following extract provides unclassified background data from U.S. government sources
More informationCRS Report for Congress
95-862 F CRS Report for Congress Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1987-1994 Richard F. Grimmett Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division August 4,
More informationMULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.
Exam Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States
More informationMontessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Middle School Twelfth Session XX March First Committee Disarmament and International Security
Background Montessori Model United Nations General Assembly Distr.: Middle School Twelfth Session XX March 2017 Original: English First Committee Disarmament and International Security This committee aims
More informationMontessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Upper Elementary Twelfth Session XX March First Committee Disarmament and International Security
Background Montessori Model United Nations General Assembly Distr.: Upper Elementary Twelfth Session XX March 2017 Original: English First Committee Disarmament and International Security This committee
More informationGreat Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018
Great Decisions 2018 Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018 I. Funding America s four militaries not as equal as they look Times Square Strategy wears a dollar sign*
More informationSetting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February
LT. REBECCA REBARICH/U.S. NAVY VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February 2016 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Introduction and summary In the
More informationSS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.
SS.7.C.4.3 Benchmark Clarification 1: Students will identify specific examples of international conflicts in which the United States has been involved. The United States Constitution grants specific powers
More information1. The number of known arms producers has doubled after the end of the cold war.
1. The number of known arms producers has doubled after the end of the cold war. 2. The present arms technology market is a buyers market where a range of modern as well as outdated defense technologies
More informationThe U.S. arms sale modeof Direct Commercial Sale influence on Taiwan Military Industry development. Outline
The U.S. arms sale modeof Direct Commercial Sale influence on Taiwan Military Industry development Outline Introduction In the U.S. foreign arms sale, there are two modes, Foreign Military Sale (FMS) and
More informationDOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress
DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs October 22, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationCanadian Industrial Participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program. Fall 2014
Canadian Industrial Participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program Fall 2014 Table of Contents Minister s Message 3 Canadian Industrial Participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program
More informationCanadian Industrial Participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program. Summer 2014
Canadian Industrial Participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program Summer 2014 Table of Contents Minister s Message 3 Canadian Industrial Participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program
More informationChapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3 Objectives 1. Summarize American foreign policy from independence through World War I. 2. Show how the two World Wars affected America s traditional
More informationIssue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (
Issue Briefs Volume 3, Issue 10, July 9, 2012 In the coming weeks, following a long bipartisan tradition, President Barack Obama is expected to take a step away from the nuclear brink by proposing further
More informationSUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond
(Provisional Translation) SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES for FY 2011 and beyond Approved by the Security Council and the Cabinet on December 17, 2010 I. NDPG s Objective II. Basic Principles
More informationCosts of Major U.S. Wars
Order Code RS22926 July 24, 2008 Costs of Major U.S. Wars Stephen Daggett Specialist in Defense Policy and Budgets Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary This CRS report provides estimates
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20549 Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information Valerie Bailey Grasso, Foreign Affairs, Defense and
More informationSec. 1. Short Title Specifies the short title of the legislation as the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of Title I Reauthorization of Programs
S. 2793, SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2016 Ranking Member Shaheen and Chairman Vitter U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship Section-by-section Sec. 1. Short Title Specifies the
More informationTestimony before the House Committee on International Relations Hearing on the US-India Global Partnership and its Impact on Non- Proliferation
Testimony before the House Committee on International Relations Hearing on the US-India Global Partnership and its Impact on Non- Proliferation By David Albright, President, Institute for Science and International
More informationUnited States General Accounting Office. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited GAP
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 4:00 p.m. Monday, February 28, 2000 EXPORT CONTROLS: National
More informationNATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE STATE DEPARTMENT ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) POLICY: A NOD TO NON-PROLIFERATION
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE STATE DEPARTMENT ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) POLICY: A NOD TO NON-PROLIFERATION NELSON CABOT, JR. COURSE 5603 THE NATIONAL SECURITY
More informationGAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Committees June 1997 OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist GAO/NSIAD-97-133
More informationForeign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22
Foreign Policy and National Defense Chapter 22 Historical Perspective 1 st 150 years of U.S. existence Emphasis on Domestic Affairs vs. Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy The strategies and goals that guide
More information1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan
1 Nuclear Weapons 1 The United States, the former Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, and China. France and China signed the NPT in 1992. 2 Article 6 of the NPT sets out the obligation of signatory
More informationJohn Fitzgerald Kennedy: Foreign Policy. A Strategic Power Point Presentation Brought to You by Mr. Raffel
John Fitzgerald Kennedy: Foreign Policy A Strategic Power Point Presentation Brought to You by Mr. Raffel A Cold War Inaugural Address Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall
More informationTHIRD COUNTRY TRANSFERS. Larry A. Mortsolf Associate Professor Defense Institute of Security Assistance Management INTRODUCTION
THIRD COUNTRY TRANSFERS by Larry A. Mortsolf Associate Professor Defense Institute of Security Assistance Management INTRODUCTION The "third country transfer" concept can perhaps be most easily described
More informationThe Advanced Technology Program
Order Code 95-36 Updated February 16, 2007 Summary The Advanced Technology Program Wendy H. Schacht Specialist in Science and Technology Resources, Science, and Industry Division The Advanced Technology
More informationU.S.-Funded Assistance Programs in China
Order Code RS22663 Updated January 28, 2008 U.S.-Funded Assistance Programs in China Summary Thomas Lum Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division United States foreign assistance
More informationProposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 Published on Arms Control Association (
Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers,
More informationForeign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22
Foreign Policy and National Defense Chapter 22 Historical Perspective 1 st 150 years of U.S. existence Emphasis on Domestic Affairs vs. Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy The strategies and goals that guide
More informationHOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction
[National Security Presidential Directives -17] HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4 Unclassified version December 2002 Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction "The gravest
More informationEvolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21195 Updated April 8, 2004 Summary Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress Gary J. Pagliano and Ronald O'Rourke Specialists in National Defense
More informationBackground Briefing: Vietnam: President Obama Visits Vietnam - 15 Carlyle A. Thayer May 23, 2016
Thayer Consultancy ABN # 65 648 097 123 Background Briefing: Vietnam: President Obama Visits Vietnam - 15 Carlyle A. Thayer May 23, 2016 [client name deleted] Q1. What do you think is the primary goal
More informationSSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W.
SSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama administrations. a. Analyze challenges faced by recent presidents
More informationSSUSH20 The student will analyze the domestic and international impact of the Cold War on the United States.
SSUSH20 The student will analyze the domestic and international impact of the Cold War on the United States. The Cold War The Cold War (1947-1991) was the era of confrontation and competition beginning
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21311 Updated January 27, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary U.S. Use of Preemptive Military Force Richard F. Grimmett Specialist in National Defense Foreign
More informationEvolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21195 Updated December 11, 2006 Summary Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress Gary J. Pagliano and Ronald O Rourke Specialists in National
More informationMilitary Expenditures Remain Near Peak
Billions of Constant 2011 Dollars Military Expenditures Remain Near Peak Michael Renner November 19, 2013 I n 2012, world military expenditures ran to $1,740 billion, expressed in constant 2011 dollars
More informationChapter Nineteen Reading Guide American Foreign & Defense Policy. Answer each question as completely as possible and in blue or black ink only
Chapter Nineteen Reading Guide American Foreign & Defense Policy Answer each question as completely as possible and in blue or black ink only 1. What are the roots of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy? 1.
More informationStrategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) I and II
Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) I and II The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) refers to two arms control treaties SALT I and SALT II that were negotiated over ten years, from 1969 to 1979.
More informationAlso this week, we celebrate the signing of the New START Treaty, which was ratified and entered into force in 2011.
April 9, 2015 The Honorable Barack Obama The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: Six years ago this week in Prague you gave hope to the world when you spoke clearly and with conviction
More informationSTATEMENT OF ROGER D. WALDRON PRESIDENT OF THE COALITION FOR GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT BEFORE THE
STATEMENT OF ROGER D. WALDRON PRESIDENT OF THE COALITION FOR GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT BEFORE THE SECTION 809 ADVISORY PANEL ON STREAMLINING AND CODIFYING ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 1 Multiple
More informationDOD Authorities for Foreign and Security Assistance Programs
DOD Authorities for Foreign and Security Assistance Programs A Comparison of the FY 2010 House and Senate Armed Services Defense Authorization Bills July 20, 2009 * The House Armed Services Committee (HASC)
More informationNavy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress
Order Code RS20643 Updated November 20, 2008 Summary Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense,
More informationDepartment of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:
Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan: 2007-2017,name redacted,, Coordinator Information Research Specialist,name redacted, Specialist in Defense Acquisition,name redacted,
More informationIssue Briefs. The UN Sanctions' Impact on Iran's Military
Issue Briefs Issue Brief - Volume 1, Number 7, June 11, 2010 Note chart below on Russian and Chinese Equipment Subject to U.N. Sanctions One of the most significant aspects of the latest round of UN Security
More informationJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER ACQUISITION
GAO July 2003 United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of
More informationBilling Code:
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/11/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-31245, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 5001-06 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationDear Delegates, It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 2014 Montessori Model United Nations Conference.
Dear Delegates, It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 2014 Montessori Model United Nations Conference. The following pages intend to guide you in the research of the topics that will be debated at MMUN
More informationNavy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress
Order Code RS20643 Updated December 5, 2007 Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress Summary Ronald O Rourke Specialist in National Defense Foreign
More informationProcurement Facilitation Paper: Vietnam
Procurement Facilitation Paper: Vietnam Executive Summary: The US-ASEAN Business Council offers its views on the business environment for U.S. defense companies in Vietnam. This paper includes the results
More informationOpen DFARS Cases as of 5/10/2018 2:29:59PM
Open DFARS Cases as of 2:29:59PM 2018-D032 215 (R) Repeal of DFARS clause "Pricing Adjustments" 2018-D031 231 (R) Repeal of DFARS clause "Supplemental Cost Principles" 2018-D030 216 (R) Repeal of DFARS
More informationProposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 Published on Arms Control Association (
Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 20 to December 31, 20 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers, jeff@armscontrol.org
More informationProposed Major U.S. Arms Export Agreements, January 2016 December 2016 Published on Arms Control Association (
Proposed Major U.S. Arms Export Agreements, January 2016 December 2016 Fact Sheets & Briefs The value of proposed U.S. major conventional arms sales agreements totaled nearly $63 billion in 2016 the second
More informationTEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. Kennedy s Foreign Policy
Kennedy s Foreign Policy Objectives Explain the steps Kennedy took to change American foreign policy. Analyze the causes and effects of the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Assess the
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY. National Missile Defense: Why? And Why Now?
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY National Missile Defense: Why? And Why Now? By Dr. Keith B. Payne President, National Institute for Public Policy Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University Distributed
More informationIT S ALL IN THE NUMBERS. The major US Wars: a look-see at the cost in American lives and dollars. Anne Stemmerman Westwood Middle School
IT S ALL IN THE NUMBERS. The major US Wars: a look-see at the cost in American lives and dollars. Anne Stemmerman Westwood Middle School Lesson Plan Summary: This lesson plan is designed for students to
More informationProposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Published on Arms Control Association (
Proposed U.S. Arms Export Agreements From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 Fact Sheets & Briefs Contact: Jeff Abramson, Non-Resident Senior Fellow for Arms Control and Conventional Arms Transfers,
More informationNavy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress
Order Code RS20643 Updated January 17, 2007 Summary Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and
More informationThe Cold War Begins. Chapter 16 &18 (old) Focus Question: How did U.S. leaders respond to the threat of Soviet expansion in Europe?
The Cold War Begins Chapter 16 &18 (old) Focus Question: How did U.S. leaders respond to the threat of Soviet expansion in Europe? 1 Post WW II Europe Divided 2 Section 1 Notes: Stalin does not allow free
More informationAnalysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions
Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR 2810 Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions A. Treaties: 1. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty
More informationSMALL BuSiNESS AdMiNiSTRATiON
2010 SMALL BuSiNESS AdMiNiSTRATiON Funding Highlights: Provides $28 billion in loan guarantees to expand credit availability for small businesses. Supports disaster recovery for homeowners, renters, and
More informationUS Aerospace Exports: The Case for Further Controls
US Aerospace Exports: The Case for Further Controls Henry Sokolski Executive Director The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center 1718 M Street, NW, Suite 244 Washington, D.C. 20036 npec@npec-web.org
More informationPart 1: Employment Restrictions After Leaving DoD: Personal Lifetime Ban
POST-GOVERNMENT SERVICE EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS (RULES AFFECTING YOUR NEW JOB AFTER DoD) For Military Personnel E-1 through O-6 and Civilian Personnel who are not members of the Senior Executive Service
More informationHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BUY AMERICAN AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2004 DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BILL
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BUY AMERICAN AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2004 DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BILL The House of Representatives recently passed the FY 2004 Defense Authorization Bill (H.R.1588) with several amendments
More informationOffice of the Inspector General Department of Defense
o0t DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING PROGRAM Report No. 98-133 May 13, 1998 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense
More informationWORLD WAR LOOMS. America Moves Towards War
WORLD WAR LOOMS America Moves Towards War Americans Cling to Isolationism Public outraged at profits of banks, arms dealers during WWI Americans become isolationists; FDR backs away from foreign policy
More informationForeign and Defense Policy
Foreign and Defense Policy The Roots of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy When the United States was founded it was a weak country on the margins of world affairs, with an uncertain future. Isolationism
More informationCOMMUNICATION OF 14 MARCH 2000 RECEIVED FROM THE PERMANENT MISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
XA0055097 - INFCIRC/584 27 March 2000 INF International Atomic Energy Agency INFORMATION CIRCULAR GENERAL Distr. Original: ENGLISH COMMUNICATION OF 14 MARCH 2000 RECEIVED FROM THE PERMANENT MISSION OF
More informationTWENTY BASIC RULES FOR PERSONNEL LEAVING THE ARMY RESTRICTIONS ON SEEKING EMPLOYMENT (BEFORE YOU LEAVE)
TWENTY BASIC RULES FOR PERSONNEL LEAVING THE ARMY The following 20 rules assume you are currently working for the Army and plan to seek employment with a non-federal entity. The categories of personnel
More informationSeptember 5, Congressional Requesters. Foreign Military Sales: Kenyan Request for Armed Aircraft
441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 September 5, 2017 Congressional Requesters Foreign Military Sales: Kenyan Request for Armed Aircraft In January 2017, the Department of Defense (DOD) notified Congress
More informationDepartment of Defense
5 Department of Defense Joanne Padrón Carney American Association for the Advancement of Science HIGHLIGHTS For the first time in recent years, the Department of Defense (DOD) R&D budget would decline,
More informationUse of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF
MEMORANDUM May 11, 2016 Subject: Presidential References to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force in Publicly Available Executive Actions and Reports to Congress From: Matthew Weed, Specialist
More informationPeter F. Asaad, Attorney At Law Immigration Solutions Group, PLLC. Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Peter F. Asaad, Attorney At Law Immigration Solutions Group, PLLC Wednesday, June 3, 2009 The National Academies Keck Center, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 Keck 100 Every year thousands of
More informationMaría del Coriseo González Izquierdo
María del Coriseo González Izquierdo (ICEX) Current ICEX CEO. She holds Bachelor s Degrees in Law, and in Economics and Business Studies from Pontificia Comillas University (Madrid), and a Master s Degree
More informationPrepared for Members and Committees of Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Œ œ Ÿ The federal role in environmental education has been an ongoing issue. For nearly two decades, EPA has been the primary federal agency responsible
More informationSSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W.
SSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama administrations. a. Analyze challenges faced by recent presidents
More informationANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FILERS
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FILERS - 2017 With the below signature, I, (print name), hereby certify that I have read the enclosed summary and understand the negotiating employment,
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21305 Updated January 3, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS): Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke Specialist in
More informationHostile Interventions Against Iraq Try, try, try again then succeed and the trouble
Hostile Interventions Against Iraq 1991-2004 Try, try, try again then succeed and the trouble US Foreign policy toward Iraq from the end of the Gulf war to the Invasion in 2003 US policy was two fold --
More informationAcquisition Reform in the FY2016-FY2018 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs)
Acquisition Reform in the FY2016-FY2018 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs) Moshe Schwartz Specialist in Defense Acquisition January 4, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45068
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 17, January 17, 2014
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release January 17, 2014 January 17, 2014 PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/PPD-28 SUBJECT: Signals Intelligence Activities The United States, like
More informationGAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate July 2011 AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND Budgeting
More informationWhy Japan Should Support No First Use
Why Japan Should Support No First Use Last year, the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that President Obama was considering ruling out the first-use of nuclear weapons, as one of several
More informationChapter 4 The Iranian Threat
Chapter 4 The Iranian Threat From supporting terrorism and the Assad regime in Syria to its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran poses the greatest threat to American interests in the Middle East. Through a policy
More informationManufacturing Extension Partnership Program: An Overview
Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program: An Overview Wendy H. Schacht Specialist in Science and Technology Policy November 20, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 97-104 Summary
More informationPolicy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War
Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War Hans M. Kristensen Director, Nuclear Information Project Federation of American Scientists Presented to Global Threat Lecture Series
More informationThe United States Enters the War Ch 23-3
The United States Enters the War Ch 23-3 The Main Idea Isolationist feeling in the United States was strong in the 1930s, but Axis aggression eventually destroyed it and pushed the United States into war.
More informationOpen DFARS Cases as of 12/22/2017 3:45:53PM
Open DFARS Cases as of 3:45:53PM 2018-D004 252.225-7049, 52.225-7050 State Sponsor of Terrorism-- North Korea 2018-D003 252.222-7007 (R) Repeal of DFARS Provision "Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking
More information2010 Small Business Exporting Survey
2010 Small Business Exporting Survey Foreword Since 1937, the National Small Business Association (NSBA) has been the nation s leading small-business advocate. Through our collaborative work with the Small
More informationCRS Report for Con. The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber
CRS Report for Con The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber Approved {,i. c, nt y,,. r r'ii^i7" Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs
More informationReport to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017
Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
More informationSmall Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program Wendy H. Schacht Specialist in Science and Technology Policy April 26, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members
More informationUS Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message
US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message Hans M. Kristensen* The Monthly Komei (Japan) June 2013 Four years ago, a newly elected President Barack Obama reenergized the international arms control community with
More informationArms Control Today. Arms Control and the 1980 Election
Arms Control Today The Arms Control Association believes that controlling the worldwide competition in armaments, preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and planning for a more stable world, free from
More informationDETENTE Détente: an ending of unfriendly or hostile relations between countries. How? Use flexible approaches when dealing with communist countries
Objectives 1. Identify changes in the communist world that ended the Cold War. 2. Examine the importance of Nixon s visits to China and the Soviet Union. VIETNAM In 1950 the U.S. begins to help France
More information