SUBJECT: U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Interim Policy Guidance (IPG) 08-1, Test and Evaluation Document Name Changes

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUBJECT: U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Interim Policy Guidance (IPG) 08-1, Test and Evaluation Document Name Changes"

Transcription

1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND 4501 FORD AVENUE ALEXANDRIA VA CSTE-TTP 4 April 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION 1. References: a. ATEC Regulation 73-1, System Test and Evaluation Policy, 16 Mar 06. b. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on Multi-Service Operational Test and Evaluation (MOT&E) and Operational Suitability Terminology and Definitions, Oct Purpose. The purpose of this IPG is to provide policy and guidance on the implementation of the standard test and evaluation (T&E) document names agreed to by all the Operational Test Agency (OTA) Commanders and the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) at the 2007 Fall OTA Commanders Conference. These names are documented in the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on Multi-Service Operational Test and Evaluation (MOT&E) and Operational Suitability Terminology and Definitions, October ATEC Regulation 73-1 as well as ATEC Pamphlet 73-1 will be updated to reflect these changes. 3. Policy. a. This policy does not affect the rapid initiative programs. ATEC will continue to write Capabilities and Limitations reports. b. ATEC will use the document names approved by all the OTA Commanders for all programs that ATEC assesses and/or evaluates, whether single-service or multi-service programs. c. Not all the names of ATEC planning documents were changed. The planning documents are listed below: (1) System Evaluation Plans (SEPs) and SEP Updates (SEP-Us) will continue to be used by ATEC. (2) Event Design Plans (EDPs) are replaced with OTA Test Plans (OTA TPs). (3) Outline Test Plans (OTPs) are replaced with Test Resource Plans (TRPs). (4) Detailed Test Plans (DTPs) will continue to be used when appropriate.

2 (5) Army Input to the OTA Test Plan (AI OTA TP) will be used on multi-service programs when ATEC is not the lead Service. d. ATEC has changed the names of all assessment and evaluation reports. ATEC will not use the terms System Assessment (SA), System Evaluation Report (SER), or Milestone (MS) B SER. e. The name of the reporting document is tied to when the document is prepared in the acquisition cycle. For example, all documents prior to the Full-Rate Production (FRP) decision are called assessments, while documents for the FRP and later are called evaluations. Assessment and evaluation are defined below: (1) Assessment is defined slightly differently by each Service; however, the basis is the same assessing risk/progress towards meeting system requirements and assessing risk/progress towards a determination of effectiveness, suitability, and survivability. (2) Evaluation is the determination of the system s effectiveness, suitability, and survivability. f. ATEC will use the document names as outlined below. Table 1 provides an overview of the documents. Enclosure 1 provides samples of the new OTA Test Plan, OTA Assessment Report, OTA Milestone x Assessment Report, OTA Evaluation Report, and OTA Follow-On Evaluation Report cover sheets. (1) OTA Assessment Report (OAR) is used to document the capabilities, limitations, and progress of the acquisition program in meeting its requirements based on test results. An OAR will not be used for reporting acquisition program effectiveness, suitability, and survivability to DOT&E for an acquisition decision. It replaces the System Assessment. (2) OTA Milestone x Assessment Report (OMAR) is used to document the acquisition program s risk and progress towards meeting effectiveness, suitability, and survivability. It replaces the MS A SER, the MS B SER, and the MS C SER (unless MS C is for an FRP decision, in which case an OTA Evaluation Report will be used instead). (3) OTA Evaluation Report (OER) is used to document the acquisition program s demonstration of its effectiveness, suitability, and survivability. It replaces the FRP SER. (4) OTA Follow-on Evaluation Report (OFER) is used to document the acquisition program s risk and progress towards meeting effectiveness, suitability, and survivability criteria beyond FRP. It replaces both the SA and SER. (5) Operational Test Report (OTR) or Abbreviated Operational Test Report (AOTR) will be used by the Operational Test Command (OTC) to document test results from all 2

3 operational test events. The AOTR is in a Technical Document format. The OTR will be the document of record for operational tests that require an in-depth test report. (6) Army Input to the OTA Report (AIOR) will continue to be used on multi-service programs when ATEC is not the lead Service. The actual name of the report depends on what the report is supporting; milestone decision is an OMAR, and full-rate production decision is an OER. 3

4 Table 1: Report Products New Name (Old Name) Purpose Signature Goes To Test Plan Supports OAR (SA) Risk assessment/ progress towards IOT&E Oversight ATEC CG All others AEC Director Accommodate all Service OTA desires Non MS program decisions/status/ as required OMAR (MS A/B/C SER) Risk assessment/ progress towards IOT&E Oversight ATEC CG All others AEC Director DOT&E-Oversight, MDA, Service Chief, PEO, PM, User, others as desired MS A/B/C decisions OER (SER) Evaluation of effectiveness, suitability, and survivability Oversight ATEC CG All others AEC Director DOT&E-Oversight, MDA, Service Chief, PEO, PM, User, others as desired Full Rate Production (FRP) Decision Review OFER (SA/SER) Evaluation of effectiveness, suitability, and survivability Oversight ATEC CG All others AEC Director DOT&E-Oversight, MDA, Service Chief, PEO, PM, User, others as desired Evaluation of Follow-on Test AOTR (TDR) Provide test findings, test data, and test team observations Test Org CDR Evaluators, PM OAR, OMAR, OER, OFER OTR (TR) Provide detailed test report with supporting analysis of test issues and criteria based on data collected during the OT Test Org CDR Evaluators, PM OAR, OMAR, OER, OFER 4

5 4. Procedures. a. Plans. (1) The SEP or SEP Update (SEP-U) will continue to describe the strategy for assessing effectiveness, suitability, and survivability and evaluating the contribution of the system to overall mission capability. The SEP/SEP-U also describes the strategy for identifying system capability limitations and assessing risks and the potential impact on mission capability. (2) The OTA Test Plan (OTA TP) will document the test design, supporting methodology, and analytic details required for the specific test for each operational test (OT), live fire test (LFT), and selected developmental test (DT). The OTA TPs for acquisition categories (ACATs) I and II and OSD Oversight list programs for OT and LFT are provided to DOT&E for approval prior to the test. The content and format of the OTA TP has not changed from the current EDP format. (a) OTA TPs are structured, as necessary, to focus on the priority measures that are the focus of the particular test event. Not all of the priority measures have to be addressed in a single test and/or single OTA TP. (b) All OTA TPs must provide a clear indication of how the test will be executed. (c) All OTA TPs will continue to be signed by the US Army Evaluation Center (AEC) Director and the Test Command s commander. (3) The TRP is prepared for all tests that require Army or other Service personnel or resources that ATEC cannot provide. Examples include Soldier support, training ranges, instrumentation, flying hours, standard ammunition, or training devices. TRPs are developed, updated, and staffed (internally and externally) using the ATEC Decision Support System (ADSS). The current OTP format will be used for the TRP. b. Reports. (1) The OTA Assessment Report (OAR) may be written at any time and will address the technical maturity of the system throughout development and demonstration, production, and post deployment. The OAR may address the required capabilities of the system, the status of corrective actions, readiness for OT, or potential impact on mission capability and sustainment. The OAR may identify needed modifications; provide information on techniques, tactics, doctrine, organizations, and personnel requirements; or evaluate the logistic supportability of the system. The scope of issues to be addressed is flexible and may or may not cover all aspects of effectiveness, suitability, and survivability (ESS). The OAR is not tied to a materiel decision review. The current SA format will be used for the OAR. 5

6 (2) The OTA Milestone Assessment Report (OMAR) is a summary report focused on a specific acquisition milestone, either A, B, or C. The content of an OMAR will vary based on the MS it is supporting. The OMAR assesses risk/progress towards meeting system requirements and assesses risk/progress towards a determination of effectiveness, suitability, and survivability. For example, a MS A OMAR will contain very little test information while a MS B OMAR will basically be a risk assessment. The current format used for the MS B Risk Assessment will be used for the OMAR. (3) The OTA Evaluation Report (OER) is the summary report provided to the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) at the FRP decision review. Its purpose is to report on the effectiveness, suitability, and survivability and evaluate the contribution of the system to overall mission capability. The current SER format will be used for the OER. (4) The OTA Follow-on Evaluation Report (OFER) will document the results for post- FRP decision OT evaluations. The current SER format will be used for the OFER. c. The following decision flow chart (figure 1) depicts what document to use and when it is needed. 6

7 Acquisition Program? No Capability & Limitation Report (CLR) Where in Acquisition Process? Prior to Full-Rate Production (FRP) Full-Rate Production (FRP) and Beyond Report Purpose? Report Purpose? Non-Milestone Milestone FRP? Beyond OTA Assessment Report Full-Rate Production? OTA Evaluation Report OTA Follow-on Evaluation Report No OTA Milestone x Assessment Report OTA Evaluation Report Figure 1. Document Decision Tree 7

8 5. Effective date. This policy becomes effective upon signature. This policy affects documents that are in draft as well as new documents. Only documents that are currently in the ATEC Command Group for signature will not be changed. 6. The ATEC Decision Support System (ADSS) is being modified to reflect the new document name changes. The AST Chairs will ensure the information for their programs in ADSS is correct. The expected effective date for the ADSS modification is 2 June Point of contact. The POC for this action is Mrs. Dianne Luna, CSTE-TTP, , DSN 761. FOR THE COMMANDER: Encl Sample Cover Sheets THOMAS R. FAUPEL COL, GS Chief of Staff Distribution: BE 8

9 Sample Cover Sheets January OTC-1234 OTA Test Plan Produced as input to support a Milestone C Production Decision Manpack Radio Limited User Test Test plan produced by U.S. Army Operational Test Command Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only, test and evaluation, month year. Other requests for this document must be referred to: Commander, USAOTC (TEOT-OP), Station Avenue, Fort Hood, TX DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure or reconstruction of the document. This document contains information EXEMPT FROM MANDATORY DISCLOSURE under the Freedom of Information Act. Exemption 5 (predecisional materials) applies. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Figure 2. OTA Test Plan 9

10 January 2008 OTA Assessment Report Produced as input to support a Materiel Release Decision Manpack Radio Report produced by U.S. Army Evaluation Center Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only, test and evaluation, month year. Other requests for this document must be referred to: Director, USAEC (TEAE-XX), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure or reconstruction of the document. This document contains information EXEMPT FROM MANDATORY DISCLOSURE under the Freedom of Information Act. Exemption 5 (predecisional materials) applies. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Figure 3. OTA Assessment Report 10

11 January 2008 OTA Milestone C Assessment Report Produced as input to support a Milestone C Production Decision Manpack Radio Report produced by U.S. Army Evaluation Center Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only, test and evaluation, month year. Other requests for this document must be referred to: Director, USAEC (TEAE-XX), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure or reconstruction of the document. This document contains information EXEMPT FROM MANDATORY DISCLOSURE under the Freedom of Information Act. Exemption 5 (predecisional materials) applies. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Figure 4. OTA Milestone X Assessment Report 11

12 January 2008 OTA Evaluation Report Produced for the support of the Full Rate Production Decision Manpack Radio Report produced by U.S. Army Evaluation Center Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only, test and evaluation, month year. Other requests for this document must be referred to: Director, USAEC (TEAE-XX), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure or reconstruction of the document. This document contains information EXEMPT FROM MANDATORY DISCLOSURE under the Freedom of Information Act. Exemption 5 (predecisional materials) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Figure 5. OTA Evaluation Report 12

13 January 2008 OTA Follow-on Evaluation Report Produced as additional input after the Full Rate Production Decision Manpack Radio Report produced by U.S. Army Evaluation Center Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only, test and evaluation, month year. Other requests for this document must be referred to: Director, USAEC (TEAE-XX), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure or reconstruction of the document. This document contains information EXEMPT FROM MANDATORY DISCLOSURE under the Freedom of Information Act. Exemption 5 (predecisional materials) applies. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Figure 6. OTA Follow-on Evaluation Report 13

System Test and Evaluation Policy

System Test and Evaluation Policy ATEC Regulation 73-1 Test and Evaluation System Test and Evaluation Policy Headquarters U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command Alexandria, VA 16 March 2006 This page intentionally left blank. SUMMARY of

More information

Department of the Army *ATEC Regulation United States Army Test and Evaluation Command 4501 Ford Avenue Alexandria, VA August 2004

Department of the Army *ATEC Regulation United States Army Test and Evaluation Command 4501 Ford Avenue Alexandria, VA August 2004 Department of the Army *ATEC Regulation 73-21 United States Army Test and Evaluation Command 4501 Ford Avenue Alexandria, VA 22302-1458 23 August 2004 Test and Evaluation ACCREDITATION OF MODELS AND SIMULATIONS

More information

ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission

ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission Brian M. Simmons Director, US Army Center 23 January 2008 Presentation to SOLE Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Agenda ATEC Mission & Roles in Acquisition Army Center

More information

Test and Evaluation Policy

Test and Evaluation Policy Army Regulation 73 1 Test and Evaluation Test and Evaluation Policy UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 16 November 2016 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 73 1 Test and Evaluation Policy

More information

Mission Based T&E Progress

Mission Based T&E Progress U.S. Army Evaluation Center Mission Based T&E Progress Christopher Wilcox Deputy/Technical Director Fires Evaluation Directorate, US AEC 15 Mar 11 2 Purpose and Agenda Purpose: To review the status of

More information

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) Army ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 59,522 TRW Total Program Cost (TY$): $1.8B Average Unit Cost (TY$): $27K Full-rate production:

More information

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete

More information

Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E

Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E Chris DiPetto 12 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Agenda DT&E Title 10 USC overview Organization DDR&E imperatives What Title 10 means for

More information

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ON MULTI-SERVICE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION (MOT&E) AND OPERATIONAL SUITABILITY TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS February 2017

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ON MULTI-SERVICE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION (MOT&E) AND OPERATIONAL SUITABILITY TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS February 2017 Department of the Army United States Army Test and Evaluation Command Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-3103 United States Marine Corps Marine Corps Operational Test and Evaluation Activity Quantico, VA

More information

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference

More information

Prepared for Milestone A Decision

Prepared for Milestone A Decision Test and Evaluation Master Plan For the Self-Propelled Artillery Weapon (SPAW) Prepared for Milestone A Decision Approval Authority: ATEC, TACOM, DASD(DT&E), DOT&E Milestone Decision Authority: US Army

More information

Planning Guidelines and Design Standards v4.0 Testing Updates

Planning Guidelines and Design Standards v4.0 Testing Updates Planning Guidelines and Design Standards v4.0 Testing Updates Presented by: Gregory Cypher Acceptance Test Lead July 12, 2011 Agenda Planning Guidelines & Design Standards (PDGS) v3.0 to v4.0 PDGS v4.0

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Human Effects Characterization

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Human Effects Characterization Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3200.19 May 17, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, September 13, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Human Effects Characterization References: See Enclosure

More information

System Test and Evaluation Procedures

System Test and Evaluation Procedures ATEC Pamphlet 73-1 Test and Evaluation System Test and Evaluation Procedures Headquarters U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command Alexandria, VA 16 June 2010 SUMMARY of CHANGE ATEC Pamphlet 73-1 System Test

More information

DoDI ,Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Change 1 & 2

DoDI ,Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Change 1 & 2 DoDI 5000.02,Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Change 1 & 2 26 January & 2 February 2017 (Key Changes from DoDI 5000.02, 7 Jan 2015) Presented By: T.R. Randy Pilling Center Director Acquisition

More information

Testing in a Joint Environment. Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army

Testing in a Joint Environment. Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army Testing in a Joint Environment Value Added and Considerations Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army June 2008 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Why do we test?

More information

DoD Instruction dated 8 December Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Statutory and Regulatory Changes

DoD Instruction dated 8 December Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Statutory and Regulatory Changes DoD Instruction 5000.02 dated 8 December 2008 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Statutory and Regulatory Changes Karen Byrd Learning Capabilities Integration Center April 2009 Changes to the

More information

Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Eustis, Virginia

Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Eustis, Virginia Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 71-12 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Eustis, Virginia 23604-5700 03 October 2012 Force Development U.S. ARMY TRAINING AND

More information

Test and Evaluation Policy

Test and Evaluation Policy Army Regulation 73 1 Test and Evaluation Test and Evaluation Policy Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 1 August 2006 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 73 1 Test and Evaluation Policy This

More information

Opera onal Test & Evalua on Manual

Opera onal Test & Evalua on Manual MARINE CORPS OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION ACTIVITY Opera onal Test & Evalua on Manual 4th Edi on, Rev 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MARINE CORPS OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION ACTIVITY Operational

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #82

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #82 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016

More information

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001

A udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001 A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001

More information

Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed

Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed Invited Article ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 7 10 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed Steven J. Hutchison, Ph.D. Defense

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) Total Program Element (PE) Cost 64312 68659 71079 72540 77725 77145 78389 Continuing Continuing DV02 ATEC Activities 40286 43109 44425 46678 47910 47007

More information

Test and Evaluation Policy

Test and Evaluation Policy Army Regulation 73 1 Test and Evaluation Test and Evaluation Policy Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 7 January 2002 UNCLASSIFIED Report Documentation Page Report Date 07 Jan 2002 Report

More information

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE A recent Peer Review of the NAVAUDSVC determined that from 13 March 2013 through 4 December 2017, the NAVAUDSVC experienced a potential threat to audit independence due to the Department

More information

AGENDA ARMY DEVELOPMENTAL AND OPERATIONAL TEST PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. How Does ATEC FIT IN? Developmental Testing What:

AGENDA ARMY DEVELOPMENTAL AND OPERATIONAL TEST PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. How Does ATEC FIT IN? Developmental Testing What: AGENDA ARMY DEVELOPMENTAL AND OPERATIONAL TEST PLAN REVIEW PROCESS Dal M. Nett Safety Director US Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) 27 June 08 ATEC/DTC/OTC DT 101 What is Developmental Testing? Why

More information

Test and Evaluation (T&E) is essential to successful system

Test and Evaluation (T&E) is essential to successful system Test and Evaluation Myths and Misconceptions Steve Hutchison, Ph.D. Test and Evaluation (T&E) is essential to successful system acquisition. For the last 43 years, the Office of the Secretary of Defense

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE

More information

Suitability... at what cost?

Suitability... at what cost? Suitability... at what cost? 5-minute warm-up act for the T&E Service Exec Panel Talk about 3 things: 1. New Materiel Availability KPP 2. DAU Suitability Research Project 3. Announce NDIA/DAU TST-301 2007

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AIR MOBILITY COMMAND AIR MOBILITY COMMAND INSTRUCTION 99-101 25 NOVEMBER 2013 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION POLICY AND PROCEDURES COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Deliberate and Crisis Action Planning and Execution Segments Increment 2A (DCAPES Inc 2A) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR)

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System - Army Increment 2 (GCSS-A Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents

More information

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM Report No. D-2001-066 February 28, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Form SF298 Citation Data Report Date ("DD MON YYYY") 28Feb2001

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 63-140 7 APRIL 2014 Acquisition AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS INSTRUCTION IS MANDATORY (AETC)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS INSTRUCTION IS MANDATORY (AETC) BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 99-103 16 OCTOBER 2013 AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND Supplement 6 APRIL 2015 Test and Evaluation CAPABILITIES-BASED TEST AND EVALUATION

More information

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and

More information

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3400.10G N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3400.10G From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHEMICAL,

More information

Report No. D August 29, Spider XM-7 Network Command Munition

Report No. D August 29, Spider XM-7 Network Command Munition Report No. D-2008-127 August 29, 2008 Spider XM-7 Network Command Munition Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated

More information

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell Product Support Manager Workshop Rapid Capabilities Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell June 8, 2017 17-S-1832 Deliberate Requirements vs. Urgent / Rapid Requirements Lanes Urgent

More information

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3401.3B N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3401.3B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NUCLEAR

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.59 January 4, 1994 Certified Current as of December 1, 2003 SUBJECT: DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management Incorporating Change 1, January 20, 1998 USD(A&T)

More information

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability Committee

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability Committee Army Regulation 15 41 Boards, Commissions, and Committees Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability Committee UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 8 May 2018

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3150.09 April 8, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 16, 2018 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: The Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Survivability

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4650.08 February 5, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) and Navigation Warfare (Navwar) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Soldier Systems - Warrior Dem/Val

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Soldier Systems - Warrior Dem/Val Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 20.602 20.886 48.309-48.309 60.003 53.434

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5141.02 February 2, 2009 DA&M SUBJECT: Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Reissues DoD

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AIR FORCE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER (AFOTEC) AIR FORCE OPERATIONAL TESTING AND EVALUATION CENTER MANUAL 99-101 11 OCTOBER 2012 Test and Evaluation OPERATIONAL TEST

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3224.03 October 1, 2007 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) References: (a) DoD Directive 3224.3,

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications

More information

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4650.01 January 9, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, October 17, 2017 ASD(NII) DoD CIO SUBJECT: Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Procedures for Joint DoD-DOE Nuclear Weapons Life-Cycle Activities

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Procedures for Joint DoD-DOE Nuclear Weapons Life-Cycle Activities Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5030.55 January 25, 2001 SUBJECT: DoD Procedures for Joint DoD-DOE Nuclear Weapons Life-Cycle Activities References: (a) DoD Instruction 5030.55, "Joint AEC-DoD

More information

Manpower, Personnel, and Training Assessment (MPTA) Handbook

Manpower, Personnel, and Training Assessment (MPTA) Handbook ARL-TN-0715 NOV 2015 US Army Research Laboratory Manpower, Personnel, and Training Assessment (MPTA) Handbook Richard A Tauson and Wayne Cream Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOTICES

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8330.01 May 21, 2014 Incorporating Change 1, December 18, 2017 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Interoperability of Information Technology (IT), Including National Security Systems

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 63-112 9 AUGUST 2006 Incorporating Change 1, 26 July 2011 Acquisition COCKPIT WORKING GROUPS COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 99-106 23 MARCH 2017 Test and Evaluation JOINT TEST AND EVALUATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY:

More information

Defense Science Board Task Force Developmental Test and Evaluation Study Results

Defense Science Board Task Force Developmental Test and Evaluation Study Results Invited Article ITEA Journal 2008; 29: 215 221 Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Defense Science Board Task Force Developmental Test and Evaluation Study Results Pete

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Integrated Strategic Planning and Analysis Network Increment 4 (ISPAN Inc 4) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 46.823 63.563 12.906-12.906 15.663 15.125

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate

More information

Joint Test & Evaluation Program

Joint Test & Evaluation Program Joint Test & Evaluation Program Program Overview Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director Air Warfare DOT&E March 22, 2005 Mr. Jim Thompson Joint Test and Evaluation Program Manager 1 What is the JT&E Program? DOT&E

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.02 December 2, 2008 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Operation of the Defense Acquisition System References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Reissues Reference

More information

Appendix Vlll Establishing ProgramlProjecWProduct Management Offices

Appendix Vlll Establishing ProgramlProjecWProduct Management Offices Appendix Vlll Establishing ProgramlProjecWProduct Management Offices Point of Contact: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), 251 1 Jefferson Davis Highway,

More information

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON). SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5223.2A THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC 20350 1000 SECNAVINST 5223.2A ASN(FM&C): NCCA ij E ~~ (W -~ 20/12 From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Secretary of the Navy DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS) Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5250.01 January 22, 2013 Incorporating Change 1, August 29, 2017 USD(I) SUBJECT: Management of Intelligence Mission Data (IMD) in DoD Acquisition References: See

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4630.8 June 30, 2004 SUBJECT: Procedures for Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) ASD(NII)/DoD

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Logistics Modernization Program Increment 2 (LMP Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents

More information

UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities. Dr. James Streilein February 2008

UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities. Dr. James Streilein February 2008 UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities Dr. James Streilein February 2008 Agenda ATEC Mission Achieving Balance (Traditional & Rapid) Common Rapid Acquisition Challenges Unmanned Systems ATEC Involvement

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and

More information

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the Contracting Process)

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the Contracting Process) S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-32 (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the 1. References. A complete list

More information

Department of Defense

Department of Defense '.v.'.v.v.w.*.v: OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR A JOINT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM INITIATIVE m

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #90

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #90 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System Report No. DODIG-2012-005 October 28, 2011 DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No.

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element.96 8.765 21.17-21.17

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Chemical and Biological Defense Program DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ##

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction, issued under the authority of DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction, issued under the authority of DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144. Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8410.02 December 19, 2008 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: NetOps for the Global Information Grid (GIG) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction, issued

More information

US Special Operations Command

US Special Operations Command US Special Operations Command Operational Test & Evaluation Overview HQ USSOCOM LTC Kevin Vanyo 16 March 2011 The overall classification of this briefing is: Agenda OT&E Authority Mission and Tenants Responsibilities

More information

TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - VIM VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COURSE

TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - VIM VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COURSE TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - VIM VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COURSE Approved by: Commandant Defense Information School Supersedes TPI Dated: July 2009 VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

More information

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: 121 124 Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Enhancing Operational Realism in Test & Evaluation Ernest Seglie, Ph.D. Office of the

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army Increment 2 (IPPS-A Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table

More information

Appendix C DA Form 7632 Instructions

Appendix C DA Form 7632 Instructions 1 (Mission/Task Description) should include the date(s) of the mission, block 2 (Date) is to be completed with the date the DD Form 2977 was prepared. b. Page 2 provides a standard risk assessment matrix,

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps Logistics Chain Management Increment 1 (GCSS-MC LCM Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval

More information

MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER

MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER Army ACAT IC Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 857 Lockheed Martin Vought Systems Total Program Cost (TY$): $2,297.7M Average Unit Cost

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013

More information

NON-MAJOR SYSTEMS OT&E

NON-MAJOR SYSTEMS OT&E NON-MAJOR SYSTEMS OT&E In accordance with Section 139, paragraph (b)(3), Title 10, United States Code, the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) is the principle senior management official

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 309 312 Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back Edward R. Greer Director, Developmental Test and Evaluation, Washington, D.C. W ith the Weapon Systems Acquisition

More information

US Army FY09 Human Systems Integration Plan

US Army FY09 Human Systems Integration Plan US Army FY09 Human Systems Integration Plan (Annex to the OSD HSI Management Plan) Version 1.0 US ARMY MANPRINT This page intentionally left blank. HQ Department of the Army, G-1 FY09 Human Systems Integration

More information

Testing in a Distributed Environment

Testing in a Distributed Environment Testing in a Distributed Environment Mr. Stephen Kreider, SES Acting Deputy Program Executive Office Integration DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case 10-1069.

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #176

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #176 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element - 24.963 76.760 30.948 0.000 30.948 20.563

More information

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL READINESS

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL READINESS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3400.10H N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3400.10H From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHEMICAL,

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 99-103 6 APRIL 2017 Test and Evaluation CAPABILITIES-BASED TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY:

More information

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8010.13E N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8010.13E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: DEPARTMENT

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1348.30 November 27, 2013 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Secretary of Defense Maintenance Awards References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Instruction

More information