UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO"

Arline Walters
6 years ago
Views:

1 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February : Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element Continuing Continuing 3186: Air and Missile Defense Radar Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR): (NOTE: FY14 and prior year funding is in PE N) The AMDR suite is being developed to fulfill Integrated Air and Missile Defense requirements for multiple ship classes. This suite consists of an SBand radar (AMDRS), an Xband radar and a Radar Suite Controller (RSC). Funding will develop AMDRS and RSC, and integrate these components with an available X band radar. AMDR will provide multimission capabilities, simultaneously supporting both long range, exoatmospheric detection, tracking and discrimination of ballistic missiles, as well as Area and Self Defense against air and surface threats. For the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) capability, increased radar sensitivity and bandwidth over current radar systems are needed to detect, track and support engagements of advanced ballistic missile threats at the required ranges, concurrent with Area and Self Defense against Air and Surface threats. For the Area Air Defense and Self Defense capability, increased sensitivity and clutter capability is needed to detect, react to, and engage stressing Very Low Observable/Very Low Flyer (VLO/VLF) threats in the presence of heavy land, sea, and rain clutter. This effort provides for the development of an active phased array radar with the required capabilities to address the evolving threat. The AMDR suite will obtain performance and technology enhancements throughout its service life based upon an approach that includes modularity of hardware and software, a scalable design and Open Architecture (OA) compliance. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) Previous President's Budget Current President's Budget Adjustments Congressional General Reductions Congressional Directed Reductions Congressional Rescissions Congressional Adds Congressional Directed Transfers Reprogrammings SBIR/STTR Transfer Program Adjustments Rate/Misc Adjustments Change Summary Explanation The funding was increased by $ million to fully fund the efforts to include AMDR on one of the FY16 DDG Flight III ships. Navy Page 1 of 13 R1 Line #118

2 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February : Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) R1 Program Element (Number/Name) The funding request was reduced by $ million to account for the availability of prior year execution balances. This properly phases funding based on the delayed award, due to protest, of the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contract. R2A Change: The titles/categories listed below were all included under in the PB15 budget exhibit. They have been broken out to provide more detail: AMDR HARDWARE (RAYTHEON) AMDR SOFTWARE (RAYTHEON) AMDR DESIGN, SUPPORT, INTEGRATION, TEST AND EVALUATION (RAYTHEON) DESIGN, SUPPORT, AND INTEGRATION TEST AND EVALUATION OPERATIONS AND ANALYSIS TEST AND EVALUATION ASSETS AND FACILITIES Notes: 1). The AMDR FY13 to FY16 funding profile does not reflect a traditional rampup/rampdown due largely to delays associated with E&MD contract award and the subsequent bid protest. As a result, $157M of FY13 funds were obligated at contract award in Oct 2013 and funding adjustments in FY14 ($115M) and FY15 ( $15M) have been made to account for the delay and to reflect savings achieved through industry competition. 2). The increased costs between FY15 and FY16 are due to the expanded scope of DT3 testing of the full Engineering Development Model at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii in FY16 compared to limited DT2 testing at the contractor's facility in FY15. In addition, there are a greater number of more complex and expensive targets procured in FY16 to support DT3 testing compared to targets being procured in FY15. The increased software development costs between FY15 and FY16 are due to the complexity and level of coding performed to support the testing requirements in DT3. Navy Page 2 of 13 R1 Line #118

3 Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) 3186: Air and Missile Defense Radar Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR): (NOTE: FY14 and prior year funding is in PE N) The AMDR suite is being developed to fulfill Integrated Air and Missile Defense requirements for multiple ship classes. This suite consists of an SBand radar (AMDRS), an Xband radar and a Radar Suite Controller (RSC). Funding will develop AMDRS and RSC, and integrate these components with an available X band radar. AMDR will provide multimission capabilities, simultaneously supporting both long range, exoatmospheric detection, tracking and discrimination of ballistic missiles, as well as Area and Self Defense against air and surface threats. For the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) capability, increased radar sensitivity and bandwidth over current radar systems are needed to detect, track and support engagements of advanced ballistic missile threats at the required ranges, concurrent with Area and Self Defense against Air and Surface threats. For the Area Air Defense and Self Defense capability, increased sensitivity and clutter capability is needed to detect, react to, and engage stressing Very Low Observable/Very Low Flyer (VLO/VLF) threats in the presence of heavy land, sea, and rain clutter. This effort provides for the development of an active phased array radar with the required capabilities to address the evolving threat. The AMDR suite will obtain performance and technology enhancements throughout its service life based upon an approach that includes modularity of hardware and software, a scalable design and Open Architecture (OA) compliance. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) Title: AMDR HARDWARE (RAYTHEON) Procure Engineering Development Model (EDM) material Plans: procurement of EDM material Plans: Title: AMDR SOFTWARE (RAYTHEON) Navy Page 3 of 13 R1 Line #118

4 Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) Design, code, test, and integrate software builds to support conduct of DT2 Plans: Design, code, test, and integrate software builds to support conduct of DT3 Plans: Title: AMDR DESIGN, SUPPORT, INTEGRATION, TEST AND EVALUATION (RAYTHEON) Support working groups (WGs) to facilitate successful integration of the radar with the ship and combat system Conduct Hardware Critical Design Review (CDR) Conduct System CDR Conduct Test Readiness Review (TRR) and AMDRS String Testing (DT2) Deliver the AMDRS/RSC simulator Plans: Support WGs to facilitate successful integration of the radar with the ship and combat system Deliver EDM to the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) Conduct set up, integration and checkout of the EDM at PMRF Conduct TRR and begin System Integration tests (DT3) at PMRF Plans: Title: DESIGN, SUPPORT, AND INTEGRATION Navy Page 4 of 13 R1 Line #118

5 Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) Support Hardware and System CDRs Support delivery of the AMDRS/RSC simulator Support contractor Test Readiness Review (TRR) and witness contractor DT2 testing Plans: Support delivery of the EDM to PMRF Conduct the DT3 TRR and support the DT3 test activities at PMRF Plans: Title: TEST AND EVALUATION OPERATIONS AND ANALYSIS Continue test planning in support of test site requirements Support contractor TRR and witness contractor DT2 testing Plans: Continue test planning in support of test site requirements Support delivery and integration of the EDM at PMRF Support DT3 TRR and conduct System Integration tests (DT3) at PMRF Plans: Title: TEST AND EVALUATION ASSETS AND FACILITIES Navy Page 5 of 13 R1 Line #118

6 Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) Procure two simple separating ballistic missile targets and other test assets to support DT3 test efforts Maintain PMRF test site facility Provide engineering services for required modifications to DT3 targets Plans: Procure four complex separating ballistic missile targets and other test assets to support DT3 test efforts Maintain PMRF test site facility Provide engineering services for required modifications to DT3 targets Plans: Title: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Provide support to Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and WGs required for program execution of the E&MD contract Analyze and assess contractor deliverables Conduct regular Program Management Reviews Assist in cost, schedule, and performance management, contract administration and oversight, earned value assessment, and risk identification and mitigation Provide support to the Hardware CDR and System CDR Provide support to the TRR to facilitate the start of DT2 testing Provide support to technical interchange meetings (TIMs) Plans: Provide support to IPTs and WGs required for program execution of the E&MD contract Support DT2 test activities Analyze and assess contractor deliverables Conduct regular Program Management Reviews Assist in cost, schedule, and performance management, contract administration and oversight, earned value assessment, and risk identification and mitigation Navy Page 6 of 13 R1 Line #118

7 Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each) Provide support to the TRR to facilitate the start of DT3 testing Provide support to TIMs Plans: R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 7 of 13 R1 Line #118 Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To RDT&E/ N: AMDR SCN/2122: DDG 51 2, , , , , , , , Continuing Continuing Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy AMDR: Plans for the Air and Missile Defense Radar are to leverage research and development investments, integrate sufficiently matured advanced technologies from technology risk reduction efforts, and incorporate Open Architecture approaches to develop a scalable radar design with major improvements in power, sensitivity, resistance to natural and manmade environments over current radar systems for simultaneous multimission BMD, Area and Self Defense AntiAir Warfare (AAW). System design will be accomplished by employing proven technologies and commercial standards to lower schedule risk and develop a product with the lowest lifecycle cost. Program scope consists of the following phases: a Concept Studies phase; a Technology Development phase, which included competitive prototyping; an E&MD phase, which includes completion of a full Engineering Development Model (EDM) for landbased testing; and transition to production. The detailed scope of this acquisition is defined in the approved Milestone B AMDR Acquisition Strategy (AS). E. Performance Metrics Technology Development (TD) phase System Requirements Review, Test Readiness Review, TD Prototype testing, TD System Functional Review, and TD Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Achieve Milestone B decision to proceed into E&MD phase E&MD contract Conduct E&MD Phase Integrated line Review Conduct Hardware Delta PDR and System Delta PDR Conduct Hardware and System CDRs

8 Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Engineering Development Model (EDM) testing Achieve Milestone C decision to proceed into production and exercise Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) options Navy Page 8 of 13 R1 Line #118

9 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Engineering and Manufacturing Development Support ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type C/CPIF Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Raytheon : Sudbury, MA Performing Activity & Location Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name) To Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal Years To MIPR GTRI : Atlanta, GA Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing SS/CPFF MIPR JHU/APL : Baltimore, MD MIT : Cambridge, MD NRL : Washington, DC NSWC/CR : Crane, IN NSWC/DD : Dahlgren, VA NSWC/PHD : Port Hueneme, CA C/CPFF SPAPSS : Alexandria, VA Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Mar Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Jan Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Jan Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Feb Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing MIPR ARL : Adelphi, MD Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing NSWC/CD : Carderock, MD CDSA Dam Neck : Dam Neck, VA NSWC/Corona : Corona, CA Jan Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Mar Jan Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Navy Page 9 of 13 R1 Line #118

10 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Support ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Allot Performing Activity & Location DISA : Scott AFB, Illinois Years To Nov Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location COMOPTEVFOR : Norfolk, VA Years To Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing MIPR GTRI : Atlanta, GA Continuing Continuing Continuing SS/CPFF MIPR JHU/APL : Baltimore, MD MIT : Cambridge, MD NAWC WD : Pt. Mugu, CA NRL : Washington, DC NSWC/DD : Dahlgren, VA NSWC/PHD : Port Hueneme, CA Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Mar Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Dec Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Jan Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Feb Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing PMRF : Kekaha, HI Dec Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing C/CPFF SPAPSS : Alexandria, VA SCSC Wallops : Wallops Island, VA SPAWAR : San Diego, CA Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Continuing Continuing Continuing Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Navy Page 10 of 13 R1 Line #118

11 Exhibit R3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item Support Management Services Travel Support Management Services Method & Type Performing Activity & Location NSWC/PHD WS : Port Hueneme, CA Performing Activity & Location C/CPFF SPAPSS : Alexandria, VA Allot PEOIWS2 : Washington, DC NSWC/DD : Dahlgren, VA Years R1 Program Element (Number/Name) To Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal Years To Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Feb Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Jan Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal Years To Project s Remarks The R3 cost categories have been expanded from PB15 to show more detail. Specifically, Support and categories have been broken out from Product Development. Navy Page 11 of 13 R1 Line #118

12 Exhibit R4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 12 of 13 R1 Line #118

13 Exhibit R4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Schedule Details Proj 3186 Start End Events by Sub Project Quarter Year Quarter Year Engineering and Manufacturing Development (E&MD) E&MD Hardware (HW) Delta Preliminary Design Review (PDR) E&MD System Delta PDR E&MD HW Critical Design Review (CDR) E&MD System CDR E&MD AMDRS String Testing (DT2) Engineering Development Model delivered to Land d Test Site LRIP Long Lead Material Approval E&MD AMDR System Integration Testing (DT3) System Verification Review/Functional Configuration Audit/Production Readiness Review Milestone C/Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Decision Review (DR) LRIP Production Navy Page 13 of 13 R1 Line #118

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #82 To Program Element - -