1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

Transcription

1 FUDS MMRP Site Inspections Overview Briefing 1 San Diego, CA Mar. 12, 2008

2 US A C Agenda FUDS Program Overview Intro to Military Munitions Response Program Site Inspections FUDS MMRP Site Inspection Phase SI Program Objectives SI Project Delivery Team Current Status Future Site Prioritization SI Technical Approach 2

3 FUDS Program Overview Formerly Used Defense Sites FUDS are properties that were formerly owned, leased, possessed by, and otherwise under the jurisdiction of the DoD or military prior to 1986 Goal Reduce risk to human health and the environment through implementation of effective, legally compliant, and cost effective response actions Customer Property owners and communities affected by these sites Engineer Regulation (ER ) army mil/usace-docs/eng-regs/er /entire 1/entire.pdf 3

4 Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Congress established the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Program in 1986 manages FUDS Program for Department of Defense (DoD) D) Local geographic Corps districts manage FUDS within their boundaries 4

5 US A C FUDS Factoids National Total FUDS Properties 9,908 5 Total FUDS Projects 4,487 HTRW 1,139 CON/HTRW 1,276 BD/DR 422 MMRP 1650 PROPERTY is the entire property formerly owned/used d by DoD D and is generally analogous to site PROJECT is the individual area of potential hazard, differentiated by type of hazard (HTRW, MMRP, CON/HTRW, BD/DR) and is generally analogous to operable unit

6 US A C More FUDS Factoids National Total Cost-To-Complete $18.7B MMRP Cost-To-Complete $12.6B FY08 FUDS Annual Work Plan: Approximately $250M MMRP Approximately $83M For the MMRP SI $35M Prioritization is paramount! 6

7 US A C The FUDS Process FUDS CERCLA (Superfund/NCP) Implementation Strategy Preliminary Assessment (PA) Inventory Project Report and Archive Records Search No DOD Action Indicated (NDAI) Time Critical Removal Action (TCRA)- Action Memorandum Non-TIme Critical Removal Action - Engineering Evaluation/Cost Estimate Site Inspection (SI) Identify sites for further or further action and chacterize release No DOD Action Indicated Time Critical Removal Action - Action Memorandum Non-TIme Critical Removal Action - Engineering Evaluation/Cost Estimate Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) RI charcterizes site to develop a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) FS uses the CSM to develop and evaluate alternatives for remedy selection No DOD Action Indicated Treatability Studies, Operate Pilot Scale Systems Proposed Plan (PP) Summarizes the propseed remedial alternative Record of Decision (ROD)/Decision Document Identifies the remedial alternative chossen, detailed assessment of RI/FS data Remedial Design (RD) Detailed designs, plans, specifications for remedial action requires an approved Explosive Safety Submission Remedial Action (RA) Construction and Operation Phases Response Complete (RC) Cleanup objective as defined in ROD is done Long Term Management (LTM) of site may be required for the response action 7 Five Year Reviews Determine if implemented response is still protective

8 The FUDS Process.zip file version Inventory 1. Inventory Project Report Preliminary Phase Assessment (INPR / PA) 2. Site Inspection (SI) Investigation Phase 3. Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (RI/FS) 4. Decision Document Response Phase 5. Remedial Action 6. Site Management 8

9 Introduction to the MMRP Site Inspections DoD D established goal of completing all MMRP SIs by end of FY10 (Navy, Air Force, Army, and FUDS) USACE ER requires Corps to use Remedial Process framework for MMRP and to work IAW with CERCLA/NCP FUDS Inventory of sites needing SI is based on the 2004 Annual Report to Congress 9

10 US A C MMRP FUDS SI Phase CERCLA Site Inspection Phase initiated FY05 USACE anticipates SIs for approximately 1000 projects (765 completed by FY10) Budget for SIs: $125M for FY05 - FY10 Conducted only on FUDS eligible projects Address potential MEC and MC hazards If separate HTRW concerns are observed during SI, FUDS geographic District is notified 10

11 Program Objectives - The Performance Work Statement Objective The objective of the MMRP SI is to determine whether the individual project sites within the FUDS program warrants further response action or no Department of Defense action indicated (NDAI) Regulatory Guidelines CERCLA and NCP Engineer Regulation and DoD Management Guidance for the Defense Environmental Response Program (DERP) 11

12 FUDS MMRP SI Current Status 474 projects have been awarded to date 174 projects have been completed to date 78 projects to be awarded in 2 nd quarter 12

13 US A C FUDS MMRP SI MRSPP Data 13 MRS Priority Total MRS s MRS Results No Known or Suspected Hazard Total 23 Evaluation Pending 3 PRP 35 No Longer Required 6 Not Evaluated 1 New AOC s 59 Final SI Reports Number of MRS

14 US A C SI Report Recommendations RI/FS (MEC & MC) 135 RI/FS (MC Only) 19 RI/FS (MEC Only) 152 PRP 35 Not FUDS Eligible 1 Right of Entry Refused 1 Outside FUDS Boundary 1 Evaluation Pending 2 NDAI

15 US A C SI Report Recommendations SI MRS Removal Action Recommendations TCRA (MEC only) 1 TCRA (MC only) 0 TCRA (MEC & MC) 2 NTCRA (MEC only) 2 NTCRA (MC only) 0 NTCRA (MEC & MC) 0 Not Recommend 470 Evaluation Pending 2 15

16 MMRP SI Process MM DC awards project Contractor t conducts Contractor TPP with regulators, prepares TPP stakeholders, Corps Memorandum district and DC Regulators, stakeholders, districts, and DC review TPP Memo - 45 Days Regulators, Mileston stakeholders, e #2 - districts, and WPA DC review approved WPA - 45 Days Cont. next page Contracto r prepares & provides Site Specific Work Plan Addendu m (WPA) Milestone #1 - TPP Memo is approved 16

17 Contractor incorporates comments & prepares Final SI Report Cont. from previous Contractor conducts field work Regulators, stakeholders, districts, & DC review Draft Final SI Report - 45 Days Contractor conducts TPP #2 & presents MRSPP Milestone #3 - Field work complete Contractor incorporate s comments and prepares Draft Final SI Report Contractor prepares & provides Draft SI Report Districts and DC review Draft SI Report - 30 Days Milestone #4 - SI Report approved MRSPP begins official QA process 17

18 SI 18 Month Timeline (approx days) Contract award (Notice to Proceed) 1 1st TPP completed 120 Contractor o submits s draft TPP memo 134 Draft TPP memo review complete 179 Contractor incorporates comments 184 Contractor resubmits TPP memo 187 TPP memo back checked & approved 190 Contractor submits draft SSWP 220 Draft SSWP review complete 265 Contractor incorporates comments 279 Contractor resubmits 281 SSWP back checked & approved 300 Contractor completes field work 360 Lab work completed 405 Contractor submits draft SI Report 435 COE completes review of draft SI 465 Contractor incorporates comments 479 Contractor submits Draft Final SI Report 482 Draft Final Review Complete 527 2nd TPP meeting complete 527 Contractor incorporates comments 534 Contractor submits Final SI Report 537 Final Report approved Project Complete

19 Ordnance Safety US A C DO NOT TOUCH! DO NOT MOVE! Note/record location Call 911 or local law enforcement 19

20 US A C Questions? Bradford McCowan Huntsville EM CX MM Division (256) Bradford.l.mccowan@usace.army.mil 20