Name of Program: The Boeing Company / Apache 64 D Block III
|
|
- Russell Harvey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Name of Program: The Boeing Company / Apache 64 D Block III Name of Program Leader: David Koopersmith Phone Number: (480) david.m.koopersmith@boeing.com Postage Address: 5000 East McDowell Road Mesa, Arizona Name of Customer Representative: COL Shane Openshaw Phone Number: (256) Shane.Openshaw@us.army.mil Bio for program leader: David Koopersmith is vice president of the AH-64D Apache and AH-6i Light Attack/Reconnaissance helicopter programs for The Boeing Company in Mesa, Ariz. The programs are part of Boeing s Global Strike organization within the Boeing Military Aircraft (BMA) business. Prior to this position, Koopersmith was vice president of Advanced Boeing Military Aircraft (Adv BMA), and was responsible for leading the Adv BMA business element of the Phantom Works business unit within Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS). Adv BMA is chartered with creating, shaping, capturing maturing and transitioning future capability solutions to the BMA business unit. Previously, Koopersmith was vice president and program manager of the Joint Unmanned Combat Air System (JUCAS program) for BDS, where he led Boeing s JUCAS team, managing all aspects of the X-45A and X-45C programs for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy customers and managing X-45N for the U.S. Navy. Koopersmith has more than 30 years of program management, engineering, business development and production experience on numerous military aircraft programs including the C-130 Avionics Modernization Program (AMP), the AV-8B Harrier II, proprietary efforts, and the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. During his F/A-18E/F assignment, he received the Excellence in Acquisition Award by the United States Navy Program Executive Office for Tactical Aircraft (TACAIR). Koopersmith brings a combination of engineering experience and program management leadership to the Apache program. His diverse background enables him to quickly analyze information and drive the team to the best possible combination of product capability and positive business results. Koopersmith s leadership style encourages out of the box thinking coupled with prudent risk management. He has established a relationship with the Army customer that is built on trust and respect. This provides the foundation for success as Apache transitions to full rate production AVIATION WEEK PROGRAM EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE 1
2 Phase I Program Narrative - 1 Fulfilling the US Army s objective to achieve sustainment of the Apache as the premier attack helicopter and weapon of choice for the Soldier, the AH-64D Apache Block III helicopter is now beginning to deliver the required operational capabilities to battlefield commanders and the user community. The program's System Design and Development (SDD) phase continues with Low Rate Production of the AH-64D Apache Block III helicopter for the U.S. Army. Following a well-established roadmap of design, development and delivery of Apache helicopters since the first production AH-64A in January 1984, the AH-64D Apache Block III brings relevant technologies and proven capabilities that are ready today for soldiers that will utilize this attack helicopter in warfighting and peacekeeping missions around the globe. Key to the success of this technology insertion program has been on-time and on-cost implementation of innovative technologies that provide extended range sensors and weapons, cognitive decision aiding, and improved aircraft performance - all while reducing operations and support cost and sustaining aircraft relevance. Carefully conceived and efficiently executed, this new Apache brings evolutionary development and revolutionary technologies as per the established key performance parameters (net ready, performance, reliability, survivability, force protection) laid out by the Department of Defense and Army Aviation leadership and agreed to by The Boeing Company program leadership. Following a risk reduction effort in 2005 to prepare the program for Milestone B, Apache Block III achieved a successful Milestone B decision in July 2006 and was designated as an ACAT 1D program, (Major Defense Acquisition Program estimated by the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition and Technology to require eventual expenditure for research, development, test and evaluation of in excess of $365 million or procurement of more than $2.19 billion). The AH- 64D Apache Block III program then entered the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase and was awarded a development contract in July As result of achieving scheduled milestones on time and on cost (Milestone B June 2006; First Flight July 2008; Limited User Test November 2009; Milestone C September 2010; Low Rate Initial Production Contract award October 2010), the program delivered the first production AH-64D Apache Block III in October Successful systems integration involves synthesizing the functions of components, assemblies and subsystems to optimize performance at the system level. The Apache Block III is a highly integrated platform designed to reduce pilot workload and accelerate the timeline to target engagement. Integration is the very definition of the Apache Block III program. The formal delivery of the first AH-64D Apache Block III helicopter to the U.S. Army marked the culmination of a significant systems integration effort. This effort encompassed the initial insertion of seventeen new technologies based on research and development initiatives into the existing AH-64D Apache Longbow to improve its performance and enhance support of the ground combat soldiers. Moreover, it addresses several obsolescence issues AVIATION WEEK PROGRAM EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE 2
3 Phase I Program Narrative - 2 The major systems integration efforts included: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Control (UAS), Open Systems Avionics architecture based on the highly advanced Block III Mission Processor, and significantly improved air vehicle operating performance due to the new Split Torque, Face Gear main transmission design and the new Composite Main Rotor Blades. The integration effort provided unrivaled capabilities and enhanced the overall aircraft performance in terms of being the only multi-role combat helicopter with the computing processing power to control UAS, with an open system architecture that will allow the future integration of new subsystems onto the aircraft much more efficiently, with a more powerful engine and drive train, and composite rotor blades that provide more lift and a combat speeds faster than the Apaches currently in service. This systems integration effort posed numerous challenges. While the technology integration was tremendously challenging, the biggest integration challenge the program faced was the re-definition of the Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development (EMD) Phase of the acquisition cycle. Army leadership determined the aircraft were needed to support the soldier as quickly as possible and transitioned the program directly from System Development and Demonstration (SDD) Phase to the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Phase. This meant that the two major efforts of EMD: (1) Integrated System Design and System Capability and (2) Manufacturing Process Demonstration were split between the SDD Phase and the LRIP Phase. The integrated system design and system capability demonstrations were focused in the SDD phase and required an aggressive component and flight test program to ensure the technology insertions met performance requirements. The manufacturing process demonstration was focused in the LRIP Phase. This meant there was not an opportunity to produce production prototype articles which drove additional risk into the production process, supplier management and engineering processes. In essence, the first production aircraft was the demonstration of the team s ability to produce the Apache Block III aircraft. The contraction of the EMD Phase drove the program to intensively manage lab and flight test operations to ensure test data was validated and concurrently reviewed with the customer to validate that the technology insertions performed as planned and requirements were met. Additionally, manufacturing planning and supplier management were constantly managed to make sure parts and manufacturing processes were ready when required to exacting production standards. The challenges continued as the first production aircraft moved down the manufacturing line where close teamwork between manufacturing, engineering, supplier management and program management working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week ultimately enabled delivery of the first LRIP aircraft ahead of schedule. These challenges solidified systems integration as a best practice within the Apache Block III program and demonstrates the dedication to the principles of systems engineering and systems integration within the Apache Block III leadership team AVIATION WEEK PROGRAM EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE 3
4 Phase I Program Narrative - 3 The purpose of a value chain is to get the required product or services to the consumer in the most efficient way, on time, with minimum inventory, and within the available budget. During the LRIP phase, there were several issues with suppliers which were addressed. Boeing s Program Management Best Practices (PMBP) tools provided guidelines to sort through complex affordability and producibility issues, resulting in decisions that enabled the program to remain on cost and schedule performance parameters. In fact, on 24 November, 2011, a key US Army customer gave high praise to Boeing for its performance delivering the first Block III aircraft early, with the tremendous capability and upgraded technology that went into the aircraft. MG Anthony Crutchfield stated about the Block III aircraft, What s behind the curtain, however, represents tomorrow. That chapter hasn t been written, but it will but it will, and it will be a chapter in history like no other chapter. I know that. I m convinced of that, because of the work that you, the Boeing soldiers, do every day. The Apache Block III program had to overcome affordability issues from day one. In the current defense budget environment, programs must perform. One of the key areas of optimization was in the concept of how to produce the remanufactured aircraft. To deliver a Block III aircraft, the previous model of the aircraft must be depopulated, completely stripped down to the data plate, and then rebuilt with the new technologies added into the aircraft. Previously, the effort to depopulate the aircraft was done in Boeing s Mesa, AZ, facility. Boeing determined that if the work was outsourced, the program could realize a cost savings. Through a competition, Systems Engineering and Services Incorporated (SESI) was selected to perform this function. SESI is a small, emerging company co-located with the Army customer in Huntsville, AL. SESI quickly demonstrated they could depopulate the aircraft, resulting in lower remanufacturing costs and freeing up valuable square footage at the Boeing plant previously used for this effort. Later, the program also successfully challenged the supplier of the Extended Forward Avionics Bays (EFABS), Fokker Aerospace, to significantly reduce the recurring ship set price, making them affordable. Another challenge for the supply chain was the newly designed, more reliable Block III main transmission. The Block III split torque, face gear (STFG) main transmission design provides for a 25% increase in power throughput in comparison to a traditional transmission that does not use this revolutionary technology. In addition, this design results in significant improvements in reliability with an expected 50% reduction in main transmission related O&S cost. The manufacturing of the STFG required using new materials which were difficult to work with. The tools and technology are leading edge and the manufacturing process would prove to be hard to manage, even with the most proficient processes. It became apparent that the supplier was managing many issues in their own regard and were not able to control the numerous complexities of manufacturing the transmission. Again, applying PMBP tools and principals, Boeing manufacturing experts were sent to the main facility in Toronto. They were quickly able to assess production limitations and implement appropriate corrective action. A closely monitored hands on approach of daily communication and weekly program updates allowed for the confident transition of the transmission build process from development into production AVIATION WEEK PROGRAM EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE 4
5 Phase I Program Narrative - 4 As LRIP continues through December 2013 and the initial development phase approaches completion, the Apache Block III program is anticipating conclusion of the Army s Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) in 2Q2012, a contract modification for continued development, and entry into the next phase of activities with a Full Rate Production decision in July The SDD phase of the program has shown strong cost performance since inception. Earned value performance consistently hovers in the.98/.99 range for both cost and schedule (CPI/SPI). An initial cost under-run was declared in December 2010 and increased through Current under-run is projected to be $6.8M - ~1% of the contract value. This outstanding performance was achieved through detailed up front planning, strict adherence to contractual requirements, close teaming between Boeing and US Government engineering counterparts, and via application of the tools and principles of the Boeing Program Management Best Practices. While still in the SDD phase of the program, Boeing is producing (under LRIP) 51 remanufactured AH-64D Apache Block III aircraft for delivery to the US Army through December 2013 while also producing and delivering new-build Apache Block III helicopters for the program s first international customer. The contract award for Full Rate Production (FRP) is anticipated for October 2012, prior to the completion of LRIP aircraft production. Each phase of the Apache Block III program was planned in numerous joint strategy sessions as the US Army and Boeing negotiated in advance of the initial contract award. Additionally, prior to contract award with the Army, Boeing and industry reviewed operational requirement and settled on the 26 technologies that will ultimately be included in the configuration designated as the AH-64D Apache Block III. As today s Army aviators are currently flying the Apache Block III and working through the demonstration and test objectives outlined for the aircraft, word is getting out about the enhanced operational effectiveness of the aircraft with its new performance and avionic capabilities. The completion of IOT&E will lead to the Army s achievement in November 2012 of the First Unit Equipped a full battalion of 24 AH-64D Apache Block III helicopters. On the occasion of the first flight as Army, Boeing and industry leaders acknowledged the successful first steps of the program s transition through phases, Al Winn, (then) Boeing vice president of Apache Programs said Achieving this (first flight) milestone proves that success can be achieved when visionaries face the unknown, embrace risks, accept challenges and overcome obstacles. With the vision afforded by hindsight, it s evident that the Apache Block III is doing just as the seasoned Apache aviator and (now retired) Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, Gen. Dick Cody foresaw, Block III is going to change the face of battle, giving us fully integrated ground and air battlefields. The enemy won t know what s coming AVIATION WEEK PROGRAM EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE 5
Phase I Submission Name of Program: AH-64E Achieves Initial Operational Capability
Identify by name a representative of the program customer, and include phone and email information. Customers will be asked for go/no go decision regarding consideration of this program for the Aviation
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) R Element (Number/Name) PE 6735A
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0603460A Joint A ir-to-ground Missile (JAGM) ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND
More informationAMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)
AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development
More informationApache Fire Control LM MFC Supplier Summit TM
Apache Fire Control 2015 LM MFC Supplier Summit LOCKHEED CLEARED MARTIN FOR PROPRIETARY PUBLIC RELEASE INFORMATION TM1409-0107-1 Apache Fire Control Programs LONGBOW Fire Control Radar (FCR) Mast Mounted
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 01-153 June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002 Today, the Army announced details of its budget for Fiscal Year 2002, which runs from October 1, 2001 through September 30,
More informationWe acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan
The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 6545A: Joint AirtoGround Missile Total
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
More informationSTATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
More informationudit Hjport /jöjroo - ös - OVO Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT OF THE COMANCHE PROGRAM
udit Hjport ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT OF THE COMANCHE PROGRAM Report No. 99-021 November 4, 1998 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense BBC QUALITY INSPECTED 8 19991229 043 /jöjroo - ös - OVO
More informationNAVAIR Control & Guidance Activities ACGSC Meeting 99, Boulder Colorado, March Shawn T Donley Naval Air Systems Command
NAVAIR Control & Guidance Activities ACGSC Meeting 99, Boulder Colorado, March 2007 Shawn T Donley Naval Air Systems Command 1 EA-18G Electronic Warfare Replacement for EA-6B ALQ-218 wideband receiver
More informationLessons in Innovation: The SSBN Tactical Control System Upgrade
Lessons in Innovation: The SSBN Tactical Control System Upgrade By Captain John Zimmerman ** In late 2013, the Submarine Force decided to modernize the 1990's combat systems on OHIO- Class submarines.
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 5 - System Development and Demonstration 0604223A - COMANCHE COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003
COST ($ in Thousands) FY 2002 Actual FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Cost to Complete Total Cost 2865 Manufacturing Technology 55,694 44,381 39,396 40,112 39,505 40,157 40,787 41,336
More informationDisruption in Aerospace/Defense
Disruption in Aerospace/Defense Peeling the Onion Mark A. Bobbi Principal Analyst, Aviation IHS Markit Aerospace, Defence, and Security November 9, 2016 Agenda A. Disruption Defined Aero/Defense Disruptions
More informationNavy-Marine Corps Strike-Fighter Shortfall: Background and Options for Congress
Order Code RS22875 May 12, 2008 Navy-Marine Corps Strike-Fighter Shortfall: Background and Options for Congress Summary Ronald O Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
More informationU.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center
U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center A Leader in Command and Control Systems By Kevin Gilmartin Electronic Systems Center The Electronic Systems Center (ESC) is a world leader in developing and fielding
More informationPRODUCT MANAGEMENT/ PRODUCT DIRECTOR OFFICE TEAM OF THE YEAR (05 LEVEL)
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology 2016 Army Acquisition Executive s (AAE) Excellence in Leadership Award PRODUCT MANAGEMENT/ PRODUCT DIRECTOR OFFICE TEAM OF THE
More informationSOF Future Vertical Lift (FVL) COL Ramsey Bentley
SOF Future Vertical Lift (FVL) COL Ramsey Bentley SOCOM J8, FVL JCOC Bottom Line Up Front The Current Fleet Of DoD Rotorcraft Cannot Continue To Be Incrementally Improved To Meet Future Operational Requirements.
More informationNaval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
More informationMULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER
MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER Army ACAT IC Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 857 Lockheed Martin Vought Systems Total Program Cost (TY$): $2,297.7M Average Unit Cost
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More informationTHE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE
More informationA udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001
A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001
More informationBuilding an Air Manoeuvre Capability: The Introduction of the Apache Helicopter
Ministry of Defence Building an Air Manoeuvre Capability: The Introduction of the Apache Helicopter REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 1246 Session 2001-2002: 31 October 2002 LONDON: The
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
More informationARMY AVIATION Apache Longbow Weight and Communication Issues
United States General Accounting Office ri AO Report to the Secretary of Defense September 1998 ARMY AVIATION Apache Longbow Weight and Communication Issues Vjn GAO/NSIAD-98-203 GAO United States General
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #121
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019
More informationTrusted Partner in guided weapons
Trusted Partner in guided weapons Raytheon Missile Systems Naval and Area Mission Defense (NAMD) product line offers a complete suite of mission solutions for customers around the world. With proven products,
More informationC4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationGAO TACTICAL AIRCRAFT. Comparison of F-22A and Legacy Fighter Modernization Programs
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate April 2012 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT Comparison of F-22A and Legacy Fighter Modernization
More informationCOL John Vannoy Program Executive Officer
COL John Vannoy Program Executive Officer ROTARY WING DISTRIBUTION A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Schedule of Presentations Day 1 Wednesday 25 May 2016 Day 2 Thursday 26 May 2016 11:30-12:30 PEO RW Strategic
More informationDetect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success
Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success Countering Smart and Adaptive Threats Military pilots and aircrews must be prepared to
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
More informationTerma and F-35 Global supplier to the Joint Strike Fighter program
Terma and F-35 Global supplier to the Joint Strike Fighter program The world s largest defense industrial project The F-35 project is headed by Lockheed Martin, with Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems as
More informationBackgrounder. Boeing Military Aircraft
Boeing Defense, Space & Security P.O. Box 516 St. Louis, MO 63166 www.boeing.com Boeing Military Aircraft Boeing Military Aircraft (BMA) includes tactical, tanker and airlift aircraft, weapons, surveillance
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1506N: Aircraft Procurement, Navy / BA 05: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 1: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 147.268 6.751 61.163-61.163 94.537 369.826
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 to Program Element (PE) 21847 26628 51644 61033 57237 50551 23977 22303 Continuing
More informationFIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 685 Boeing Platform Integration Total Program Cost (TY$): $180M Data Link Solutions FDL Terminal Average
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element ED8: Paladin Integrated Management (PIM)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUSAF Tankers: Critical Assumptions for Comparing Competitive Dual Procurement with Sole Source Award
USAF Tankers: Critical Assumptions for Comparing Competitive Dual Procurement with Sole Source Award The Congress has expressed interest in better understanding the costs associated with competitive dual
More informationEvolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21195 Updated December 11, 2006 Summary Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress Gary J. Pagliano and Ronald O Rourke Specialists in National
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
More information1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue
1THE ARMY DANGEROUSLY UNDERRESOURCED' AUSA Torchbearer Campaign Issue Ffty years ago, Task Force Smith of the 241h Infantry Division- the first American ground forces deployed to defend South Korea - engaged
More informationThe Five Myths of a Non-Developmental Item (NDI) Acquisition Program and. Implications for the T-X Program
The Five Myths of a Non-Developmental Item (NDI) Acquisition Program and Implications for the T-X Program After 45 years of Government and Industry experience in the operations, acquisition and sustainment
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 42.067 6.509 5.000-5.000 41.500 30.000
More informationGAO DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Information on Apache Helicopter Support and Readiness. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2001 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Information on Apache Helicopter Support and Readiness GAO-01-630 Contents Letter 1 Results in
More informationExhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification Sheet
Budget Item Justification Sheet AA6605 AH-64 MODS Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification Sheet Exhibit P-40 Appropriation / Budget Activity / Serial No: Aircraft Procurement, Army / 2 / Modification of
More informationARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call
Electronic Warfare Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 APR-48A - Archived 4/2006 Outlook DF cueing for
More informationAlternatives for Success. One Program s Unconventional Structure
Alternatives for Success One Program s Unconventional Structure Maj. Christopher P. Hill Frank Kendall, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, continues to champion the initiatives
More informationApache battalion transitions to more powerful drones
12A January 15, 2015 FORT BLISS BUGLE Apache battalion transitions to more powerful drones Photos by Sgt. Christopher B. Dennis / CAB, 1st AD Public Affairs Sgt. Phillip A. Roach, an unmanned aircraft
More informationAn Overview of PEO AVIATION. Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association. Paul Bogosian PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER AVIATION
An Overview of PEO AVIATION Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association Paul Bogosian PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER AVIATION 1 1 Army Global Commitments AC STATIONED OVERSEAS 103,000 AC STATIONED STATESIDE
More informationThe Verification for Mission Planning System
2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications (AITA 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-389-2 The Verification for Mission Planning System Lin ZHANG *, Wei-Ming CHENG and Hua-yun
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
More informationPROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD)
EXHIBIT R-2, FY 2001 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0305206N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD) (U) COST: (Dollars in
More informationGAO TACTICAL AIRCRAFT. DOD Needs a Joint and Integrated Investment Strategy
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives April 2007 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT DOD Needs
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2008 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER Recent Decisions by DOD Add to Program Risks GAO-08-388 March 2008 Accountability Integrity
More informationEvolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress
Order Code RS21195 Updated April 8, 2004 Summary Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress Gary J. Pagliano and Ronald O'Rourke Specialists in National Defense
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 to Program Element (PE) 72521 13259 61946 71307 85450 99440
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More information(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910
TITLE III PROCUREMENT The fiscal year 2018 Department of Defense procurement budget request totals $113,906,877,000. The Committee recommendation provides $132,501,445,000 for the procurement accounts.
More informationUS Army/AMRDEC S&T Overview
Presented to: NDIA 61 st Annual Fuze Conference US Army/AMRDEC S&T Overview Distribution Statement A - Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited. Review completed by AMRDEC Public Affairs Office
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element.96 8.765 21.17-21.17
More informationWITNESS STATEMENT OF
WITNESS STATEMENT OF General Charles R. Holland Commander in Chief United States Special Operations Command Before the 107 th Congress United States Senate Committee on Armed Services Hearing on the V-22
More informationFort Riley, Kansas. Brave, Responsible, and On Point. ONE for the Nation. An Army Community of Excellence
Fort Riley, Kansas Brave, Responsible, and On Point One for Soldiers One for Families One for Civilians One for our Communities ONE for the Nation An Army Community of Excellence DRAFT 1 FORT RILEY, KANSAS
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #90
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationReport to the Public Accounts Committee on the basis for a possible acquisition of combat aircraft. March 2009
Report to the Public Accounts Committee on the basis for a possible acquisition of combat aircraft March 2009 REPORT ON THE BASIS FOR A POSSIBLE ACQUISITION OF COMBAT AIRCRAFT Contents I. Introduction
More informationGAO ELECTRONIC WARFARE. The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System. Report to the Secretary of Defense
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Secretary of Defense April 2001 ELECTRONIC WARFARE The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System GAO-01-448 Contents
More informationGUARDING THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT. Stephen J Scukanec. Eric N Kaplan
GUARDING THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference Hyatt Regency Mission Bay San Diego October 25-28, 2010 Stephen J Scukanec Flight Test and Evaluation Aerospace Systems
More informationNAVAIR Commander s Awards recognize teams for excellence
NAVAIR News Release NAVAIR Commander Vice Adm. David Architzel kicks of the 11th annual NAVAIR Commander's National Awards Ceremony at Patuxent River, Md., June 22. (U.S. Navy photo) PATUXENT RIVER, Md.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #124
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationMulti-Mission Maritime Aircraft Acquisition Planning: Requirements Development and Maturation
Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft Acquisition Planning: Requirements Development and Maturation Christopher L. Evans The Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft Program will recapitalize the Navy s capabilities
More informationDepartment of Defense Technology Transfer, Transition, and Manufacturing 2007 Beyond SBIR Phase II: Bringing Technological Edge to the Warfighter
Labs Warfighters Companies Department of Defense Technology Transfer, Transition, and Manufacturing 2007 Beyond SBIR Phase II: Bringing Technological Edge to the Warfighter August 23, 2007 Cynthia E. Gonsalves,
More informationWARFIGHTER FOCUSED. Training Systems
WARFIGHTER FOCUSED Training Systems Advanced Training Systems for the Warfighter Kratos exhibits the knowledge and skills to put together a lifecycle training program to support your specific training
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 22.63 3.676 32.789-32.789 35.932
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 216 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 217 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 215 FY 216 R1 Program
More informationGOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:
Keynote by Dr. Thomas A. Kennedy Chairman and CEO of Raytheon Association of Old Crows Symposium Marriott Marquis Hotel Washington, D.C. 12.2.15 AS DELIVERED GOOD MORNING THANK YOU, GENERAL ISRAEL FOR
More informationF-22 RAPTOR (ATF) BACKGROUND INFORMATION
F-22 RAPTOR (ATF) The F-22 is an air superiority fighter designed to dominate the most severe battle environments projected during the first quarter of the 21 st Century. Key features of the F-22 include
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Operational Energy Capability Improvement. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationWELCOME TO THE CARIC SK WORKSHOP! LOREN P. HENDRICKSON, P.ENG. REGIONAL DIRECTOR (MB/SK)
WELCOME TO THE CARIC SK WORKSHOP! LOREN P. HENDRICKSON, P.ENG. REGIONAL DIRECTOR (MB/SK) Time Final Agenda - 2017 CARIC SK Regional Workshop (Rm 2E11) 13:30 Introduction (Amit Shukla) 13:35 Opening Remarks
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total Program Element - 9.967 8.117-8.117 50.084 104.866 132.174 229.912 Continuing Continuing 675346:
More information6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit March 14-15, 2018 Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria, VA 22314 Program Design
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207134F PE TITLE: F-15E SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS Cost ($ in Millions)
More information2013 Program Excellence Award. Phase I Submission Name of Program: Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar Command and Control (C-RAM C2)
2013 Program Excellence Award Phase I Submission Name of Program: Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar Command and Control (C-RAM C2) Name of Program Leader: Chris Frei Phone Number: 310-764-6909 Email:
More informationNAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL. 29 June 2011 COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND. Presented to: Presented by:
NAVAL AVIATION: NOW AND IN THE FUTURE Presented to: Presented by: 29 June 2011 NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND NAVAIR Public
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 P-1 Line #50
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force Date: February 2016 3010F: Aircraft Procurement, Air Force / BA 05: Modification of Inservice Aircraft / BSA 5: Other Aircraft ID Code (A=Service
More informationFuture Expeditionary Armor Force Needs
Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs Chris Yunker MEFFV JCIDS Team Lead Marine Corps Combat Development Command 703-432-4042 (MCSC) 703-784-4915 (MCCDC) Yunkerc@mcsc.usmc.mil Chris.Yunker@usmc.mil This
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 242.669 68.656 70.614 82.195-82.195
More informationF/A-18 E/F SUPER HORNET
F/A-18 E/F SUPER HORNET Navy ACAT IC Program Total Number of Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average Unit Cost (TY$): Full-rate production: 12 LRIP-1 20 LRIP-2 548 Production $47.0B $49.9M 3QFY00 Prime
More informationPhase I Submission Name of Program: TARGETS & COUNTERMEASURES PROGRAM
Phase I Submission Name of Program: TARGETS & COUNTERMEASURES PROGRAM Name of Program Leader: Dr. Patti Dare Phone Number: (256) 217-6261 Email: patricia.h.dare@lmco.com Postage Address: 4800 Bradford
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element 966.537 66.374 29.083 54.838 0.000 54.838 47.369
More informationRECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE
RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE FIRST SESSION, 115TH CONGRESS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF DEPARTMENT
More information