A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth
|
|
- Benjamin Crawford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth Cathy Shneerson, Lead Researcher Beck Taylor, Co-researcher Sara Kenyon, Chief Investigator School of Health and Population Studies, Primary Care Clinical Sciences Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT. Aims The aim of this systematic review is to identify any existing themes in the existing research literature, which can be used to inform a focus group study exploring midwives views of their discussions with women about their options for where to give birth i. Any themes identified in the review process will be used to inform our analysis of the focus group data, by identifying what is already known in the literature about midwives place of birth (PoB) discussions with women (deductive analysis of the data) and what new information has been identified from the focus groups with midwives (inductive analysis of the data). The systematic review will aim to answer the following questions to inform our understanding of midwives views of their discussions with women about their options for where to give birth. Question 1: What is known about midwives views of the discussions with women about their options for where to give birth (the how, what, where and when)? Question 2: Have any interventions been implemented to support midwives PoB discussions with women? If so, what were the barriers and facilitators to implementing them and have the interventions been effective? 1
2 Background Discussion of PoB is important for women and maternity services, yet presently the detail, content and delivery of these discussions are not clear. We have little understanding of midwives perceptions of PoB discussions, including what good place of birth discussion should look like, or what challenges midwives face in integrating PoB discussion into their practice. The 2011 Birthplace Study ii found that for low risk, multiparous women, there was no significant difference in safety outcomes between women who gave birth in obstetric units, midwifery-led units, or at home. It also found fewer maternal interventions in women giving birth at home and a low transfer rate of 12%. The Birthplace study found that for low risk women, planned birth at home was more cost effective than in other settings. An increase in the numbers of suitable women planning birth at home could deliver cost savings to the NHS. Offering choice in PoB may also increase satisfaction, with many studies reporting increased satisfaction with nonobstetric unit settings. iii,iv Birmingham Women s NHS Foundation Trust (BWNFT) has seen a significant increase in the birth rate in recent years and increasing the uptake of other birth settings may relieve some of the pressure on inpatient maternity service capacity. Midwives have the opportunity to provide information and discussion to women to open up choice of PoB by raising awareness and allowing women to consider different PoB options. However, women don t always know about the full range of PoB options. v Elsewhere, midwives have been observed to allow their own beliefs to influence their PoB discussions with women. vi Anecdotal evidence from local stakeholders at BWNFT suggests that there is also variation in the way PoB is discussed in community maternity services. It is important therefore to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. The systematic review will do this by establishing what is known, from midwives perspectives, about their discussions with women about their options for where to give birth. In addition the systematic review will attempt to inform this topic by exploring whether any interventions have been implemented to support midwives PoB discussions with women and, if so, whether they been effective. It is important to examine which interventions (if any) have been implemented in the past to understand what has proved successful in facilitating PoB discussions with women, as well as identifying any challenges and facilitators to implementing these interventions. By doing so, we can then identify ways of moving PoB discussions between midwives and women forward. The findings from the review will be 2
3 used to inform a focus group study exploring midwives views of their discussions with women about where to give birth. Aims of systematic review To undertake a systematic literature review, to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options of where to give birth. This will firstly examine what is known about midwives views of their discussions with women about their options for where to give birth (how, what, where and when). It will also examine whether any interventions have been implemented to support midwives PoB discussions with women, and if so, whether they been effective. Methods Search Strategy Electronic Searches Relevant trials will be identified from the following sources: Medline, Cochrane Database, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Popline, EMBASE Grey literature will also be searched, through searching the Department of Health, Royal College of Midwifery, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, National Childbirth Trust, Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services, Maternity Action, Which? Birth Choice, NHS England and King s Fund, websites. Internet searches will also be performed in Google and Google Scholar to search for any relevant, unpublished studies. Reference lists of key full text articles included in the review will be checked to identify any potentially eligible studies. Registration: The review will be registered with PROSPERO (registration number a/w). The PRISMA statement will be followed to ensure that all studies identified in the search strategy are systematically filtered through the stages of the systematic review. vii, vii Search Terms In order to answer both of the research questions posed by the review, an explicit search strategy will be followed (table1) to search for relevant literature. Search terms will be combined using the following Boolean operators (and, or). A combination of both text 3
4 words and indexed terms (such as MeSH) will be applied in each database. Search terms will be modified as necessary for each electronic database searched. An example of the search terms used in the Medline database is shown in table 1. Reference lists of key full text articles included in the review will be checked to identify any potentially eligible studies. Table 1: Example of Search Strategy from Medline (R) 1946 to February Week # Searches 1 (birthplace or place of birth) ti,ab. 2 ((home or hospital or institut$ or place or locat$ or setting$) adj3 (birth$ or confine or confinement or confining or deliver$)). ti,ab. 3 Home childbirth.mp. or Home Childbirth/ 4 Delivery, Obstetric/px 5 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 6 (choice or preference or decision$ or dialog$ or discussion$ or consultation$ or conversation$ or communication$ or attitude$ or perspective$ or view$). Ti,ab. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept word, unique identifier] 7 Patient Preference/ 8 (Women$ adj3 Preference$).ti,ab 9 Midwifery/ 10 (midwife$ or midwives)ti,ab. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept word, unique identifier] 11 6 and or 8 or 9 or and 12 Study Selection All studies identified using the search strategy described will be screened for inclusion in the review using the eligibility criteria outlined on the study selection checklists (appendix 1). To be included in the review, identified studies must meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the study selection checklist for either, question one, question two, or both. The eligibility criteria for both are outlined below: 4
5 Inclusion criteria for questions 1 and 2: Is the study a systematic review, randomised or quasi- randomised controlled trial, observational study or qualitative study? Is the study focused around place of birth discussions between midwives and women, from the perspective of the midwife? Is the study in the English language? Has the study been carried out in Europe, North America or Australasia? Has the study been published since 2000? In addition, the following study inclusion criteria will also be adhered to for question 2: Does the study include an intervention (tool/training programme/procedure) that midwives have either received or been responsible for delivering? Does the study explore the effectiveness, barriers or facilitators, of the intervention in supporting midwives PoB discussions with women? Exclusion criteria for questions 1 and 2: Is the study focused around place of birth discussions between midwives and women, from the perspective of the women (or anyone else except the midwife? Has the study been published prior to the year 2000? In order to systematically and transparently filter the flow of information through the different phases of the systematic review, all studies identified in the search strategy will be filtered using the PRISMA flow chart vi, viii (figure 1). All titles and abstracts of articles identified in the search will be scanned and papers which clearly do not fulfil all of the eligibility criteria will be excluded. Full text copies of the remaining articles will be obtained and checked against the eligibility criteria, and those that do not meet the eligibility criteria will also be discarded. Those articles that remain will all be included in the systematic review. To ensure rigor in the study selection process two reviewers (CS, BT) will independently check through all of the full text articles identified by the search strategy to ensure study selection bias is minimised. Any papers that are not unanimously excluded or included by both reviewers will be re-examined by both reviewers until an outcome is agreed. If the two reviewers cannot reach an agreement regarding the eligibility status of the 5
6 paper, a third reviewer (SK) will be asked to make the final decision as to whether or not the study should be included. Any disagreements regarding eligibility of studies will be recorded to ensure transparency of the review process. Additionally, all full-text articles that are screened in the identification process will be logged in a table which will state the reasons for every study excluded from the review. It is possible that the eligibility criteria stated may need to be adjusted if it becomes apparent that relevant studies are being excluded from the review or irrelevant studies are being included. As a result the eligibility criteria will be piloted on a small number of papers at the start of the identification process, and if any problems arise, changes to the eligibility criteria will be made at this early stage. Any changes will be reported in the review. Figure 1: Flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review 6
7 Data Extraction In order to answer the research question a data extraction form (appendix 2) will be used to extract data from the articles included in the systematic review. Quality Assessment For both qualitative and quantitative study designs, the CASP checklist critical appraisal tools will be used to assess study quality ix. Any information on the study that has not been reported in the article under review will be sought by contacting the author of the study for further details, in order to carry out a thorough quality assessment. Methods of Analysis and Identification of Common Themes Data analysis will be undertaken to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options of where to give birth. It will examine how, what, why and when PoB discussions take place. It will also measure, whether any of the interventions (if any are identified) used were effective in supporting midwives PoB discussions with women and what the barriers and facilitators were to the intervention. Effectiveness of the intervention will be measured by any of the following outcome measures: Improving midwives knowledge about PoB Improving midwives confidence in delivering PoB discussions to women Improving women s choice or knowledge about PoB options Changes in women s place of birth setting The proportion of time midwives spend discussing choice of PoB with women Due to the anticipated variety of study designs included in the systematic review, metaanalyses of the data is unlikely to be appropriate, but will be used, if necessary, to provide a panoramic view of results beyond individual studies, allow a pooling of results across studies. However, it is more likely that thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be carried out. Thematic analysis focuses on what is said, rather than how it is said. It identifies units of meaning by attributing codes to blocks of text throughout the 7
8 narrative. Patterns of codes and group characteristics develop into themes and the relationships between themes can then be assessed and interpreted x. Thematic analysis will allow us to establish any common themes regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options of where to give birth, within and between the studies included in the review. These themes will be used to inform the subsequent focus group study i, by identifying what is already known in the literature about midwives PoB discussions with women (deductive analysis of the data). Timescale for Completion of Systematic Review Feb 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 Database Searching X Identification of Relevant Studies X X Data Extraction Quality Assessment X X Data Analysis and Synthesis X Interpretation of Data and Report Writing X X 8
9 References i Shneerson, C, Taylor, B, Kenyon, S. Midwives views of their discussions with women about their options for where to give birth ii Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011;343:d7400 iii Royal College of Midwives/Royal College of Obstetricians. Joint statement on home births Available from iv Hodnett E.D., Downe S., Walsh D. & Weston J. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 9. v Pitchforth E., Van Teijlingen E.R., Watson V., Tucker J., Kiger A., Ireland J., Farmer J., Rennie A.M., Gibb S., Thomson, E.& Ryan M. "Choice" and place of delivery; a qualitative study of women in remote and rural Scotland. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2009;18: vi Finlay S, Sandall J. "Someone's rooting for you": continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare. Soc Sci Med Oct;69(8): vii PRISMA. Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses; viii Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reportingitems for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMAstatement. British Medical Journal 2009;339: ix CASP Checklists. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Available from x Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications;
10 Appendix 1 Study Selection Checklist: Question 1 Eligibility Criteria Yes No Inclusion Criteria Is the study a systematic review, randomised or quasi- randomised controlled trial, observational study or qualitative study? Is the study focused around place of birth discussions between midwives and women, from the perspective of the midwife? Is the study in the English language? Has the study been carried out in Europe, North America or Australasia? Has the study been published since 2000? Exclusion Criteria Is the study focused around place of birth discussions between midwives and women, from the perspective of the women (or anyone else except the midwife)? Has the study been published prior to the year 2000? Not Sure Question 2 Eligibility Criteria Yes No Inclusion Criteria Is the study a systematic review, randomised or quasi- randomised controlled trial, observational study or qualitative study? Is the study focused around place of birth discussions between midwives and women, from the perspective of the midwife? Is the study in the English language? Has the study been carried out in Europe, North America or Australasia? Has the study been published since 2000? Does the study include an intervention (tool/training programme/procedure) that midwives have either received or been responsible for delivering? Does the study explore the effectiveness of the intervention in supporting midwives PoB discussions with women? Exclusion Criteria Not Sure 10
11 Is the study focused around place of birth discussions between midwives and women, from the perspective of the women (or anyone else except the midwife)? Has the study been published prior to the year 2000? Place an X in the box to answer the questions above when identifying papers for inclusion in the review. For inclusion in the review the study must answer YES to ALL the inclusion criteria and NO to ALL the exclusion criteria. Papers that answer NO to any of the inclusion criteria or YES to any of the exclusion criteria MUST be excluded from the study. If any X s are placed in the NOT SURE box, then a decision as to whether it should be included in the review must be discussed with the second reviewer. If no agreement is made, the decision must be passed onto a third reviewer. Is the study to be included in the review? YES/NO Name of Study: Study Reference:
12 Appendix 2 Table 2: Data Extraction Checklist This checklist will be piloted on the first few studies identified in the systematic review and modified accordingly to ensure all relevant data is recorded. Data Extraction Checklist Study ID/Title Publication Date Reviewers Name/Date of Review Article Reference Author Contact Details Eligibility Confirm Eligible for Inclusion Reason for Exclusion Study Characteristics Aim of Study Study Design (systematic review/quasi RCT/RCT/observational/qualitative study)? Multi/Single Centre Study Total Study Duration (start and finish date) Analysis Methods Used? Concerns about bias? Number of women in caseload Age of participants Gender Country of study Educational qualifications Ethnicity Date of study Outcomes and Findings: Question 1 Definition of outcome measure(s) Outcomes presented and reported Measurement tool/type of analysis used Location of PoB discussions Timing of PoB discussions Length of PoB discussions Information covered in PoB discussion Midwives rationale for discussing PoB Outcome and Findings: Question 2 Definition of outcome measure 12
13 Outcomes presented and reported Measurement tool/type of analysis used Description of intervention Length of intervention Setting of intervention Was the intervention effective? Participants Total number of participants Midwifery setting (community, homebirth, obs etc ) Do participants carry out PoB discussions with women? Frequency of PoB discussions Other Funding source Author s key conclusions Reference to other relevant studies Correspondence required *Additional data may be extracted on individual studies that are specific to their study design (if relevant). This data will be logged in a separate data extraction table. Conflict of Interest The author(s) declare no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgements/ Sources of Funding The CLAHRC Maternity Theme The Maternity and Child Health team of the West Midlands CLAHRC (Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care) programme is based at the University of Birmingham. They undertake research that is close partnership with local health services, with the aim of improving services and outcomes for patients within five years (though often much sooner than this). As part of their maternity research activity, the team has committed to work with the Home Birth Service (HBS) to evaluate the new programme. This protocol describes one of a number of proposed HBS-related projects. Others include qualitative research exploring the perspectives of potential HBS patients, fathers, women who have been cared for by the service and work with midwives to explore communication about birthplace options. 13
Systematic Review. Request for Proposal. Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN
Systematic Review Request for Proposal Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN Sponsored by the New Jersey Center for Evidence Based Practice At the School of Nursing University of Medicine
More informationKNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS: Literature Searches and Beyond
KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS: Literature Searches and Beyond Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, MD, PhD Department of Community Health Sciences & George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation University of Manitoba Email:
More informationAssessing competence during professional experience placements for undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2012 Assessing competence during professional experience placements for
More informationTITLE: Pill Splitting: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines
TITLE: Pill Splitting: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines DATE: 05 June 2015 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES Breaking drug tablets is a common practice referred to as pill
More informationJo Naylor-Smith. A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Health Research (MRes)
What are women s views on homebirth? A study to inform the development of practical strategies that will promote birth at home as a choice for low-risk, multiparous women Jo Naylor-Smith A thesis submitted
More informationCritical appraisal of systematic reviewsijn_1863
414..418 International Journal of Nursing Practice 2010; 16: 414 418 TIPS AND TRICKS Critical appraisal of systematic reviewsijn_1863 Dónal P O Mathúna PhD Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Decision-Making and
More informationEvidence Based Guidelines for
Evidence Based Guidelines for Midwifery-Led Care in Labour Date Issued: November 2012 Review date: November 2016 The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has a fundamental role in promoting the midwifery profession
More informationMidwifery led units in UK- organizational context. Chief Investigator: Dr. Lucia Rocca-Inehacho, City of London University, UK
Midwifery led units in UK- organizational context Date of STSM: From the 11 th until 24 th September 2017 Host: MUNet and City of London University. Chief Investigator: Dr. Lucia Rocca-Inehacho, City of
More informationReviewing the literature
Reviewing the literature Smith, J., & Noble, H. (206). Reviewing the literature. Evidence-Based Nursing, 9(), 2-3. DOI: 0.36/eb- 205-02252 Published in: Evidence-Based Nursing Document Version: Peer reviewed
More informationNursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care
EVIDENCE SERVICE Providing the best available knowledge about effective care Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care RAPID APPRAISAL OF EVIDENCE, 19 March 2015 (Style 2, v1.0) Contents
More informationClinical Practice Guideline Development Manual
Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual Publication Date: September 2016 Review Date: September 2021 Table of Contents 1. Background... 3 2. NICE accreditation... 3 3. Patient Involvement... 3 4.
More informationAshfield Healthcare Nurse Agency Ashfield House Resolution Road Ashby-de-la-Zouch LE65 1HW
Ashfield Healthcare Nurse Agency Ashfield House Resolution Road Ashby-de-la-Zouch LE65 1HW Inspected by: Amanda Cross Type of inspection: Unannounced Inspection completed on: 27 May 2014 Contents Page
More informationThe influence of workplace culture on nurses learning experiences: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.
The influence of workplace culture on nurses learning experiences: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Kate Davis, RN, BNsg, Master of Clinical Science (Evidence Based Healthcare) The School
More informationProcess and methods Published: 23 January 2017 nice.org.uk/process/pmg31
Evidence summaries: process guide Process and methods Published: 23 January 2017 nice.org.uk/process/pmg31 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationCOMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME Standard operating procedure April 2018 1. Introduction The Commissioning Support Programme (CSP) at NICE supports the
More informationPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews: An expanding resource
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews: An expanding resource Alison Booth 1, Marc Avey 2, Rob de Vries 3, David Moher 2, Lesley Stewart 1 1, University of York, UK 2 Ottawa
More informationA Systematic Review of the Liaison Nurse Role on Patient s Outcomes after Intensive Care Unit Discharge
Review Article A Systematic Review of the Liaison Nurse Role on Patient s Outcomes after Intensive Care Unit Discharge Zeinab Tabanejad, MSc; Marzieh Pazokian, PhD; Abbas Ebadi, PhD Behavioral Sciences
More informationGPs apply for inclusion in the NI PMPL and applications are reviewed against criteria specified in regulation.
Policy for the Removal of Doctors from the NI Primary Medical Performers List (NIPMPL) where they have not provided primary medical services in the HSCB area in the Preceding 24 Months Context GPs cannot
More informationQuarterly data report
Quarterly data report Quarter 1, Year 1: April to June 2016 INTRODUCTION In 2016 the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) introduced a system of revalidation for nurses and midwives on its register. Every
More informationWELLBEING OF WOMEN RESEARCH PROJECT GRANTS 2018 GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS
WELLBEING OF WOMEN RESEARCH GRANT APPLICANT GUIDELINES 2018 Amended October 2017 WELLBEING OF WOMEN RESEARCH PROJECT GRANTS 2018 GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS About Wellbeing of Women...
More informationThe Experiences of Mental Health Professionals and. Patients in the use of Pro Re Nata Medication in Acute
The Experiences of Mental Health Professionals and Patients in the use of Pro Re Nata Medication in Acute Adult Mental Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. Bernadette Morkunas
More informationEducation Adopting and adapting clinical guidelines for local use
Education 2007;9:48 52 10.1576/toag.9.1.048.27296 www.rcog.org.uk/togonline The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Education Adopting and adapting clinical guidelines for local use Author Gillian C Penney Key
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: Healthcare Infection Society Guidance product: Clinical Guidelines Date: 23 March 2015 Version: 1.6 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 19 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation...
More informationPlace of Birth Handbook 1
Place of Birth Handbook 1 October 2000 Revised October 2005 Revised February 25, 2008 Revised March 2009 Revised September 2010 Revised August 2013 Revised March 2015 The College of Midwives of BC (CMBC)
More informationSystematic Review Search Strategy
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Program Adult Asthma Care: Promoting Control of Asthma, Second Edition- March 2017 Systematic Review Search Strategy Concurrent
More informationBritish Society for Surgery of the Hand. (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical
British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical Treatment (B.E.S.T.) Process Manual 1 st Edition (12 th version, November 2016) Review Date: November 2019 BSSH Evidence for Surgical
More informationShort Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. short report George K Freeman, Professor of General Practice,
More informationReducing Attendances and Waits in Emergency Departments A systematic review of present innovations
Reducing Attendances and Waits in Emergency Departments A systematic review of present innovations Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) January
More informationDisposable, Non-Sterile Gloves for Minor Surgical Procedures: A Review of Clinical Evidence
CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Disposable, Non-Sterile Gloves for Minor Surgical Procedures: A Review of Clinical Evidence Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0
More informationCarers experiences when the person they have been caring for enters a residential aged care facility permanently: A systematic review
Carers experiences when the person they have been caring for enters a residential aged care facility permanently: A systematic review A thesis submitted by Janelle Jacobson as fulfilment for the award
More informationDownloaded from:
Hogan, H; Carver, C; Zipfel, R; Hutchings, A; Welch, J; Harrison, D; Black, N (2017) Effectiveness of ways to improve detection and rescue of deteriorating patients. British journal of hospital medicine
More informationTITLE: Double Gloves for Prevention of Transmission of Blood Borne Pathogens to Patients: A Review of the Clinical Evidence
TITLE: Double Gloves for Prevention of Transmission of Blood Borne Pathogens to Patients: A Review of the Clinical Evidence DATE: 27 March 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES As concern surrounding the risk
More informationHaving a baby at North Bristol NHS Trust
Having a baby at North Bristol NHS Trust Exceptional healthcare, personally delivered Congratulations on your pregnancy! We hope that you will find this booklet helpful in providing you with useful information
More informationPCNE WS 4 Fuengirola: Development of a COS for interventions to optimize the medication use of people discharged from hospital.
PCNE WS 4 Fuengirola: Development of a COS for interventions to optimize the medication use of people discharged from hospital. Aim: The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set for interventions
More informationEffectiveness and safety of intravenous therapy at home for children and adolescents with acute and chronic illnesses: a systematic review protocol
Effectiveness and safety of intravenous therapy at home for children and adolescents with acute and chronic illnesses: a systematic review protocol Helena Hansson 1 Anne Brødsgaard 2 1 Department of Paediatric
More informationHow to Find and Evaluate Pertinent Research. Levels and Types of Research Evidence
AACN Advanced Critical Care Volume 24, Number 4, pp. 416-420 2013 AACN Clinical Inquiry Bradi B. Granger, RN, PhD Department Editor How to Find and Evaluate Pertinent Research Adrianne Leonardelli, MLIS
More informationClinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Guidance producer: National Osteoporosis Guideline Group Guidance product: Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis Date: 9 March 2017 Version: 1.3 Final Accreditation Report
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide December 2014 Quality standards process guide Page 1 of 44 About this guide This guide
More informationECLEPS CEL Workshop July 16, 2008 Evidence Based Practice (EBP)
ECLEPS CEL Workshop July 16, 2008 Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Definition: Evidence Based Practice Evidence based nursing practice is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of theoryderived, research-based
More informationBetter Births and Continuity: Midwife Survey Results
INSTITUTE OF APPLIED HEALTH RESEARCH Better Births and Continuity: Midwife Survey Results Beck Taylor Fiona Cross-Sudworth Christine MacArthur February 2018 Table of contents Executive summary 4 1. Introduction
More informationExamination of the Newborn by Registered Midwives Protocol (CG484)
Examination of the Newborn by Registered Midwives Protocol (CG484) Approval and Authorisation Approved by Maternity Clinical Governance Committee Job Title or Chair of Committee Chair, Maternity Clinical
More informationHow NICE clinical guidelines are developed
Issue date: January 2009 How NICE clinical guidelines are developed: an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS Fourth edition : an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS Fourth edition
More informationBritish Association of Dermatologists
Guidance producer: British Association of Dermatologists Guidance product: Service Guidance and Standards Date: 13 March 2017 Version: 1.2 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 26 Contents Introduction...
More information2016 Mommy Steps Program Descriptions
2016 Mommy Steps Program Descriptions Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life of our members Mommy Steps Program Descriptions I. Purpose Passport Health Plan (Passport) has developed approaches
More informationNHS Health Check Programme rapid evidence synthesis
NHS Health Check Programme rapid evidence synthesis The Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge and RAND Europe Dr Juliet Usher-Smith, Clinical Lecturer in General Practice, University of Cambridge
More informationDraft National Quality Assurance Criteria for Clinical Guidelines
Draft National Quality Assurance Criteria for Clinical Guidelines Consultation document July 2011 1 About the The is the independent Authority established to drive continuous improvement in Ireland s health
More informationJBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(12) 81-93
Meaningfulness, appropriateness and effectiveness of structured interventions by nurse leaders to decrease compassion fatigue in healthcare providers, to be applied in acute care oncology settings: a systematic
More informationEvaluation of NHS111 pilot sites. Second Interim Report
Evaluation of NHS111 pilot sites Second Interim Report Janette Turner Claire Ginn Emma Knowles Alicia O Cathain Craig Irwin Lindsey Blank Joanne Coster October 2011 This is an independent report commissioned
More informationCity, University of London Institutional Repository
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Rayment, J., McCourt, C., Rance, S. & Sandall, J. (2015). What makes alongside midwifery-led units work? Lessons from
More informationEvidence Review - maternity safe staffing i mprovement resource version 2 31/1/17
National Safe Sustainable Staffing programme Evidence Review - maternity safe staffing i mprovement resource Jane Sandall, Cath Taylor, Hannah Rayment-Jones, King s College, London Background The Secretary
More informationRapid Review Evidence Summary: Manual Double Checking August 2017
McGill University Health Centre: Nursing Research and MUHC Libraries What evidence exists that describes whether manual double checks should be performed independently or synchronously to decrease the
More informationTransforming Mental Health Services Formal Consultation Process
Project Plan for the Transforming Mental Health Services Formal Consultation Process June 2017 TMHS Project Plan v6 21.06.17 NOS This document can be made available in different languages and formats on
More informationEssential Skills for Evidence-based Practice: Evidence Access Tools
Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice: Evidence Access Tools Jeanne Grace Corresponding author: J. Grace E-mail: Jeanne_Grace@urmc.rochester.edu Jeanne Grace RN PhD Emeritus Clinical Professor of
More informationEffectiveness of interventions for the development of leadership skills among nurses: a systematic review protocol
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2016 Effectiveness of interventions for the development of leadership skills
More informationPractising as a midwife in the UK
Practising as a midwife in the UK An overview of midwifery regulation CONTENTS Introduction 3 Section 1: Education 4 Section 2: Joining the register and maintaining registration 6 Section 3: Standards
More informationCity, University of London Institutional Repository
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Hollowell, J., Rowe, R., Townend, J., Knight, M., Li, Y., Linsell, L., Redshaw, M., Brocklehurst, P., Macfarlane, A. J.,
More informationBuilding & Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches
Building & Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches Created and Presented by: Ken Wright, MSLS Health Sciences Librarian ktwright@mchs.com 614-234-5222 1 Outline of Evidence-Based
More informationPolicy Summary. Policy Title: Policy and Procedure for Clinical Coding
Policy Title: Policy and Procedure for Clinical Coding Reference and Version No: IG7 Version 6 Author and Job Title: Caroline Griffin Clinical Coding Manager Executive Lead - Chief Information and Technology
More informationIdentification and analysis of randomised
2 Centre for Health Economics, University of York Nicky Cullum, research fellow Correspondence to: Dr Nicky Cullum, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD. Accepted for publication
More informationThe effectiveness of culturally-focused interventions in increasing satisfaction of hospitalized adult Asian patients: a systematic review protocol
The effectiveness of culturally-focused interventions in increasing satisfaction of hospitalized adult Asian patients: a systematic review protocol Karolina Ubogaya, FNP-BC, RN 1 Millicent Alfred, FNP-BC,
More informationApproaches to health-care provider education and professional development in perinatal depression: a systematic review
Legere et al. BC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2017) 17:239 DOI 10.1186/s12884-017-1431-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Approaches to health-care provider education and professional development in perinatal depression:
More informationLow Molecular Weight Heparins
ril 2014 Low Molecular Weight Heparins FINAL CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE RESEARCH PLAN September 2015 FINALCOMPREHENSIVE RESEARCH PLAN 2 A. Introduction The objective of the drug class review on LMWH is
More informationTHE INCLUSION OF COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN AUSTRALIAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY COURSES: A SURVEY PRE-TEST
THE INCLUSION OF COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN AUSTRALIAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY COURSES: A SURVEY PRE-TEST Helene Marcella Diezel Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine Faculty
More informationTemplates for reporting pre-hospital major incident medical management: systematic literature review
Open Access To cite: Fattah S, Rehn M, Reierth E, et al. Templates for reporting pre-hospital major incident medical management: systematic literature review. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001082. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2012-001082
More informationInfluences on you as a prescriber
Influences on you as a prescriber A CPD open learning programme for non-medical prescribers DLP 154 Contents iii About CPPE open learning programmes vii About this learning programme x Section 1 The influence
More informationJBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 84-96
Competencies and skills to enable effective care of severely obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery across a multi-disciplinary health care perspective: a systematic review protocol Audrey Stephen
More informationScottish HEI equality outcomes:
Scottish HEI equality outcomes: a sector overview Contents Background 2 Governing body responsibilities 3 Approaches taken to setting and publishing equality outcomes 4 Publishing 4 Alignment of equality
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS
INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS This introduction consists of: 1. Introduction to the UK Public Health Register 2. Process and Structures
More informationIntegrated approaches to worker health, safety and wellbeing: Review Update
Integrated approaches to worker health, safety and wellbeing: Review Update Dr Nerida Joss Samantha Blades Dr Amanda Cooklin Date: 16 December 2015 Research report #: 088.1-1215-R01 Further information
More informationReport on District Nurse Education in the United Kingdom
Report on District Nurse Education in the United Kingdom 2015-16 1 District Nurse Education 2015-16 Contents Key points 3 Findings Universities running the programme 3 Applicants who did not enter the
More informationInequalities Sensitive Practice Initiative
Inequalities Sensitive Practice Initiative Maternity Unit Report - 2008 Royal Alexandria Hospital 1 Acknowledgment I would like to take this opportunity to thank the staff from the maternity services in
More informationEvidence based practice: Colorectal cancer nursing perspective
Evidence based practice: Colorectal cancer nursing perspective Professor Graeme D. Smith Editor Journal of Clinical Nursing Edinburgh Napier University China Medical University, August 2017 Editor JCN
More informationWritten and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH Vol.20 no.4 2005 Theory & Practice Pages 423 429 Advance Access publication 30 November 2004 Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged
More informationDELEGATION OF CARE POLICY FOR NURSES, MIDWIVES AND ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
` DELEGATION OF CARE POLICY FOR NURSES, MIDWIVES AND ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Page 1 of 19 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. AIM OF POLICY 5 3. SCOPE 5 4. ACCOUNTABILITY 6 5. RESPONSIBILITY
More informationYates, Karen (2010) My passion is midwifery : midwives working across dual roles in the country. PhD thesis, James Cook University.
This file is part of the following reference: Yates, Karen (2010) My passion is midwifery : midwives working across dual roles in the country. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is
More informationPROTOCOL FOR UNIVERSAL ANTENATAL CONTACT (FOR USE BY HEALTH VISITING TEAMS)
Scope - CP12 PROTOCOL FOR UNIVERSAL ANTENATAL CONTACT (FOR USE BY HEALTH VISITING TEAMS) RATIONALE The Healthy Child Programme Pregnancy and the first five years of life (DH, 2009) states that health professionals,
More informationBurden of MRSA Colonization in Elderly Residents of Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Burden of MRSA Colonization in Elderly Residents of Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz, MPH, PhD Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson School of Nursing Philadelphia,
More informationEffectively implementing multidisciplinary. population segments. A rapid review of existing evidence
Effectively implementing multidisciplinary teams focused on population segments A rapid review of existing evidence October 2016 Francesca White, Daniel Heller, Cait Kielty-Adey Overview This review was
More informationSafeguarding Supervision Policy (Children, Young People & Adults at Risk)
Safeguarding Supervision Policy (Children, Young People & Adults at Risk) 1 SUMMARY The Children act (2004) Section 11 places a statutory responsibility to safeguard children NHS organisations. Enfield
More informationThe Renal Association
Guidance producer: The Renal Association Guidance product: Clinical Practice Guidelines Date: 11 January 2017 Version: 1.4 Final Accreditation Report Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation...
More informationSystematic review of interventions to increase the delivery of preventive care by primary care nurses and allied health clinicians
McElwaine et al. Implementation Science (2016) 11:50 DOI 10.1186/s13012-016-0409-3 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Systematic review of interventions to increase the delivery of preventive care by primary care nurses
More informationBabylon Healthcare Services
Babylon Healthcare Services Limited Babylon Healthcare Services Ltd. Inspection report 60 Sloane Avenue London SW3 3DD Tel: 0207 1000762 Website: www.babylonhealth.com Date of inspection visit: 4 July
More informationA summary of: Five years of cerebral palsy claims
A summary of: Five years of cerebral palsy claims A thematic review of NHS Resolution data September 2017 Advise / Resolve / Learn Our report Five years of cerebral palsy claims, provides an in-depth examination
More informationFinal scope for the systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness evidence for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)
Final scope for the systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness evidence for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) Contents 1. AIM...2 2. BACKGROUND...2 3. INTERVENTIONS...3
More informationNON-MEDICAL PRESCRIBING POLICY
NON-MEDICAL PRESCRIBING POLICY To be read in conjunction with the Medicines Policy, Controlled Drug Policy and the FP10 Prescribing Forms Policy Version: 5 Date of issue: August 2017 Review date: August
More informationEvidence-Based Practice Pulling the pieces together. Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI March 2017
Evidence-Based Practice Pulling the pieces together Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI March 2017 Learning Objectives Delineate the differences between Quality Improvement (QI), Evidence Based Practice (EBP),
More informationOSH Evidence. Search Documentation Form. How can needlestick injuries in health workers be prevented?
OSH Evidence Clearinghouse of Systematic Reviews Search Documentation Form Collected systematic reviews for the topic: How can needlestick injuries in health workers be prevented? Update 2014 - actual
More informationText-based Document. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on the Research Literacy of Post-Registration Nurses: A Systematic Review
The Henderson Repository is a free resource of the Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International. It is dedicated to the dissemination of nursing research, researchrelated, and evidence-based
More informationInstitute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Reviews
Institute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Reviews Christopher H Schmid Tufts University ILSI 23 January 2012 Phoenix, AZ Disclosures Member of Tufts Evidence-Based Practice Center Member, External
More informationYost et al. Implementation Science DOI /s Implementation Science
Yost et al. Implementation Science DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0286-1 Implementation Science SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Open Access The effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for promoting evidence-informed
More informationDomiciliary non-invasive ventilation for recurrent acidotic exacerbations of COPD: an economic analysis Tuggey J M, Plant P K, Elliott M W
Domiciliary non-invasive ventilation for recurrent acidotic exacerbations of COPD: an economic analysis Tuggey J M, Plant P K, Elliott M W Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation
More informationHealth Professionals Perceptions and Experiences of Open Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.
Health Professionals Perceptions and Experiences of Open Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. Jacinta Byrth Master of Clinical Science Joanna Briggs Institute Faculty of Health Science
More informationCOLLEGE OF MIDWIVES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
COLLEGE OF MIDWIVES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DEFINITION OF A MIDWIFE MIDWIFERY MODEL OF PRACTICE A midwife is a person who, having been regularly admitted to a midwifery educational programme duly recognised
More informationNorthern Ireland Practice and Education Council for Nursing and Midwifery. Project Plan for. Development of information and resources for
Northern Ireland Practice and Education Council for Nursing and Midwifery Project Plan for Development of information and resources for Midwives in Northern Ireland relating to Medicines CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction
More informationThis is the consultation responses analysis put together by the Hearing Aid Council and considered at their Council meeting on 12 November 2008
Analysis of responses - Hearing Aid Council and Health Professions Council consultation on standards of proficiency and the threshold level of qualification for entry to the Hearing Aid Audiologists/Dispensers
More informationAmbitious new standards to shape the future of nursing and midwifery for future generations
Ambitious new standards to shape the future of nursing and midwifery for future generations Anne Trotter Assistant Director, Education and Standards 27 June 2018 Our objectives Raise the ambition for
More informationQ&A regarding Maternity Safety Strategy actions and Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) incentive scheme
Q&A regarding Maternity Safety Strategy actions and Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) incentive scheme Q1) What are the aims of the CNST incentive scheme and why maternity? The Maternity Safety
More informationNurse Led Follow Up: Is It The Best Way Forward for Post- Operative Endometriosis Patients?
Research Article Nurse Led Follow Up: Is It The Best Way Forward for Post- Operative Endometriosis Patients? R Mallick *, Z Magama, C Neophytou, R Oliver, F Odejinmi Barts Health NHS Trust, Whipps Cross
More informationMr MARAKA MONAPHATHI. Nurses views on improving midwifery practice in Lesotho
Inaugural Commonwealth Nurses Conference Our health: our common wealth 10-11 March 2012 London UK Mr MARAKA MONAPHATHI Nurses views on improving midwifery practice in Lesotho In collaboration with the
More informationUK Renal Registry 20th Annual Report: Appendix A The UK Renal Registry Statement of Purpose
Nephron 2018;139(suppl1):287 292 DOI: 10.1159/000490970 Published online: July 11, 2018 UK Renal Registry 20th Annual Report: Appendix A The UK Renal Registry Statement of Purpose 1. Executive summary
More information