Keele Clinical Trials Unit

Transcription

1 Keele Clinical Trials Unit Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Summary Box Title SOP Index Number SOP 21 Version 4.0 Approval Date Effective Date Non-Compliance: Deviations and Serious Breaches of GCP and/or the Trial Protocol 13-Oct Oct-2017 Review Date October 2019 Lead Author Reference Steve Alcock KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 DISCLAIMER This SOP is the property of Keele Clinical Trials Unit (Keele CTU), Faculty of Health, Keele University and the content cannot be reproduced without specific permission from the owner. All SOPs and associated documents must be accessed through the dedicated SOP area of the Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences (ipchs) Intranet to ensure the correct version is being used. If this document is being accessed through any other method, such as electronic copies saved onto a network drive or in printed form, it is only valid for use if the version number and effective date shown above is the same as that shown on the ipchs Intranet. Any superseded versions of this document need to be promptly withdrawn from use. All individuals undertaking functions outlined in this document are responsible for ensuring that they are trained in the procedures outlined in the correct version of this document. SOP Template v6.0 date 18 Aug 2016 Signature Box Print Name Signature Date Research Integrity Manager Senior Trial Manager Emma Skinner Susie Hennings Signed hard copy stored in approved SOP file with Research Integrity office Signed hard copy stored in approved SOP file with Research Integrity office 13-Oct Oct-2017 Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 1 of 13

2 Version History Log Version Date Approved Reason(s) for Change Implementation Plan Oct-2015 Approval of version 1.0 All Research Institute staff will be notified of the SOP release. Staff are expected to read the SOP, as applicable to their role. Study Coordinators are to cover the procedures at the next operations and management group meetings for the trials Jul-2016 Update to trial deviation form, and All Research Institute staff addition of conditions of will be notified of the SOP sponsorship withdrawal release. Staff are expected to read the SOP, as applicable to their role. Trial Managers are to cover the procedures at the next operations and management group Jan-2017 Update following serious breach notification to clarify process Oct-2017 Update following changes made to the forms for reporting and investigation, and the management of the process. meetings for the trials. All Keele Health and Social Care Research QMS users will be notified of the new SOP. Staff are expected to read the new version of the SOP when it is released, as applicable to their role. The updated procedures are to be implemented from the SOP effective date All Keele Health and Social Care Research QMS users will be notified of the new SOP. Staff are expected to read the new version of the SOP when it is released, as applicable to their role. The updated procedures are to be implemented from the SOP effective date Training sessions to be led by Lead Author focusing on the completion of the new form. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 2 of 13

3 Table of Contents 1. Purpose Scope and Applicability Background Procedures All Studies Summary Flow Diagram Identification of potential non-compliance [FOR Initial Report] [FOR Research Integrity Office Assessment] Additional Information... 9 [FOR Local PI Assessment]... 9 [FOR Further Assessment] [FOR Independent Review] [FOR Serious Breach Submission] [FOR Urgent Safety Measures] [FOR26 - Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) Plan] [FOR Deviation closure] Reporting deviations Serious Breaches Non-compliance Data Key Personnel to whom this SOP Applies Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 3 of 13

4 1. Purpose This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) describes the process for management and escalation of non-compliance and serious breaches of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and/or the approved trial/study protocol. 2. Scope and Applicability This SOP applies to all individuals undertaking functions outlined herein. This includes all core Keele CTU staff and all other academic, research, management or admin staff, or students working on Keele University sponsored/keele CTU managed clinical research projects through site agreements, service or other contractual arrangements. This SOP must be followed in line with the NHS Research Governance Framework, and the University, Research Institute and CTU policies. Where applicable to Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs) this SOP must be followed in line with the UK Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 and subsequent amendments, and the EU Clinical Trials Directive. This SOP must also be followed in line with any current MHRA requirements as detailed on their website. Where applicable to non-ctimp studies this SOP must be followed in line with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. Whilst elements of this SOP relate only to CTIMPs, e.g. reporting Serious Breaches to the MHRA, the principles of identifying and managing non-compliance apply to non-ctimp studies. For Keele University Sponsored research studies, operational responsibility for identification, classification and reporting of non-compliance is delegated to the Chief Investigator (CI) with the support of the Sponsor. 3. Background Deviations from study protocols and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) occur commonly in health and social care research. The majority of these instances are technical non-compliances that do not result in harm to participants, do not compromise data integrity, or significantly affect the scientific value of the reported results of the study. These technical deviations must be still be documented, and appropriate corrective and preventative actions must be taken. It is the responsibility of the sponsor to assess the impact of any serious breaches on the scientific value of the study. The sponsor can terminate or suspend a study if there are concerns around patient safety or study conduct (see HSCRC-POL-01 Policy for Health and Social Care Research for further information). Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 4 of 13

5 Where Keele University is not the Sponsor but the function of reporting serious breaches to the main REC and MHRA is delegated by the Sponsor to Keele University, the arrangement does not affect the legal responsibility of the Sponsor. All reports and correspondence relating to the issue must be collated and supplied to the Sponsor. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 5 of 13

6 7 calendar day deadline SOP 21: Non-Compliance: 4. Procedures 4.1 All Studies Summary Flow Diagram Identification of potential non-compliance (section 4.1.2) CI completes [FOR25.1 Initial Report] and e- mails to Research Integrity Office (section 4.1.3) Sponsor notified of non-compliance event via [FOR25.1 Initial Report] submitted to Research Integrity Office (section 4.1.4) Sponsor records event on Edge workflow, assigns unique deviation code and completes [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment] (section 4.1.4) Local PI review [FOR25.3 Local PI Assessment] (if required) (section 4.1.5) Serious breach identified at any stage (section 4.2) [FOR26 Corrective and Preventative Action Plan] (if required) (section 4.1.5) Serious Breach Notification Form completed by Sponsor and CI (section 4.2) Further assessment carried out by CI or other relevant individual [FOR25.4 Further Assessment] (if required) (section 4.1.5) Final sponsor review of non-compliance [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment] (section 4.1.5) Research Integrity Manager submits Serious Breach Notification Form to MHRA (CTIMPS) and NHS REC (section 4.2) and completes [FOR25.6 Serious Breach Submission] Independent review of deviation if sponsor review does not agree with CI assessment [FOR25.5 Independent Review] (section 4.1.5) Deviation closure and reporting [FOR Closure] (section 4.1.6) Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 6 of 13

7 4.1.2 Identification of potential non-compliance Potential noncompliance identified For all research, non-compliance may be identified through any study activity, but in particular through: Central monitoring procedures such as consent form review or data management (SOP 14: Monitoring) Site visits Self-reporting by a study site or participant Potential noncompliance reported to the Chief Investigator A potential non-compliance event affecting a study must be reported to the Chief Investigator (CI) as soon as any member of the study team becomes aware of an event. This must be followed up in writing (e.g. via or a logged telephone call). The CI or delegated individual must then follow up the event and is classed as the investigator for the purposes of this SOP. Confirm noncompliance The investigator must collect information to assess whether the event is a true non-compliance event or could be a misunderstanding or otherwise not a noncompliance event. For example, a protocol written broadly to cover variation in activity at site may cause activity to be misinterpreted as non-compliance by a local study team. Investigator completes Section A of [FOR25.1 Initial Report] If the CI wishes to initiate an urgent safety measure, (see SOP 20: Safety Reporting and Pharmacovigilance) to protect participants from any immediate hazard to their health and safety, this must be indicated in Section A of [FOR25.1 Initial Report]. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 7 of 13

8 4.1.3 [FOR Initial Report] CI or delegate completes Section B of [FOR25.1 Initial Report] within 24 hours of being notified of event. This section is used by the CI to assess the severity of the non-compliance event, in accordance with the study protocol. Investigator completes Section C of [FOR25.1 Initial Report] (if known at this time) Completion of section C should NOT delay submission of [FOR25.1 Initial Report] to the Research Integrity Office and should therefore only be completed at this time if the information necessary to classify the deviation and / or root cause is already available when Section B is completed. CI completes and signs Section D of [FOR25.1 Initial Report], for CTU managed studies a Senior Trials Manager must also sign, and they (or the Investigator) send to the Research Integrity Office. Submit to the Research Integrity Office via to research.governance@keele.ac.uk with a subject heading of [RG/sponsor code: study acronym/short title] Non-compliance notification. The judgement on whether an instance of non-compliance is likely to have a significant impact on the scientific value of the study depends on a variety of factors e.g. the design of the study, the type and extent of the data affected by the breach, the overall contribution of the data to key analysis parameters, the impact of excluding the data from the analysis etc. For examples of what is classed as a serious breach see guidance for the notification of serious breaches of GCP or the study protocol on the MHRA website. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 8 of 13

9 4.1.4 [FOR Research Integrity Office Assessment] Research Integrity Office logs event on Edge as a workflow and assigns a deviation code. The Research Integrity Office will log the event on Edge as a workflow and assign a unique deviation code using the code allocation spreadsheet. The Research Integrity Office will acknowledge receipt of the form and notify the Investigator of the deviation code. Research Integrity Manager reviews [FOR25.1 Initial Report] and completes section A of [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment]. In [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment] the Research Integrity Manager will make an initial assessment regarding the noncompliance event. If further information is required to complete the review the Research Integrity Manager will initiate the applicable form. Where further information is required, the Research Integrity Manager will complete [FOR25.4 Further Assessment] and return this to the Investigator. If the non-compliance has the potential to be a serious breach, the Research Integrity Manager will notify the Head of Academic Legal Services and Head of Research Integrity at the earliest opportunity. If the CI has identified the non-compliance as a Serious Breach the NHS REC and MHRA (in the case of CTIMPs) must be notified within 7 calendar days. The process for reporting a serious breach is detailed in section Additional Information The following Forms will be initiated by the Research Integrity Manger if they are required: [FOR Local PI Assessment] The investigator, CI or Research Integrity Manager, will indicate in [FOR25.1 Initial Report] or [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment] (as applicable) whether [FOR25.3 Local PI Assessment] needs to be completed by the PI at the research site. The Research Integrity Manager will initiate [FOR25.3 Local PI Assessment]. This is only required for deviations that have occurred at a specific research site. This process must be facilitated by the CI / investigator. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 9 of 13

10 [FOR Further Assessment] If there is a need for further assessment this will be indicated by the CI on [FOR25.1 Initial Report] or the Research Integrity Manager on [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment]. [FOR25.4 Further Assessment] will be initiated by the Research Integrity Manager and must be completed by the CI or their delegate. [FOR Independent Review] Where additional expertise is required to assess the severity of an event, the Research Integrity Manager will initiate [FOR25.5 Independent Review]. For CTIMPs; if the Research Integrity Manager s review of seriousness is different from the CI s decision, an independent reviewer must be asked to complete [FOR25.5 Independent Review]. If the outcome of the independent review is that a serious breach has occurred and this had not been previously reported the processes in Section 4.2 of this SOP must be followed. [FOR Serious Breach Submission] (See section 4.2) [FOR Urgent Safety Measures] Where an USM is required in relation to the deviation, [FOR25.7 Urgent safety Measures] is completed by the Research Integrity Manager. USMs are managed in accordance with SOP 20: Safety Reporting and Pharmacovigilance. [FOR26 - Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) Plan] It may be sufficient for all CAPA to be detailed in [FOR25.1 Initial Report] Section A. Where a full CAPA is required, the Research Integrity Manager will initiate [FOR26 Corrective and Preventative Action Plan]. This must be completed by the investigator through liaison with the CI and study team. The CAPA must describe what actions are required to correct the deviation and how to prevent it happening again in the future. If the separate [FOR26 - Corrective and Preventative Action Plan] has been used, the CAPA code must be referenced in the respective box in [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment]. The Research Integrity Manager will review the proposed CAPA and associated timeframes to ensure that actions are completed in a reasonable period. The Research Integrity Manager may escalate breaches of timeframes or other issues to the Head of Research Integrity [FOR Deviation closure] The Research Integrity Manager will review the information provided in all completed forms. If unsure about any aspect of the information, the Research Integrity Manager may contact the CI, Investigator, Lead Statistician or appropriate Trial Manager for further clarification using [FOR25.4 Further Assessment]. The Research Integrity Manager will complete Section B of [FOR25.2 Research Integrity Office Assessment] Once the deviation has been resolved [FOR Closure] must be completed by the Research Integrity Manager. For CTIMPs, any serious breaches must be considered as ongoing until confirmed closed by the MHRA Inspector. The original completed GCP and Protocol Deviation Forms must be filed in the Study Master File and copies with the Research Integrity Office. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 10 of 13

11 4.1.7 Reporting deviations The Research Integrity Manager will notify the Head of Academic Legal Services and Head of Research Integrity of potential and confirmed serious breaches. All deviations must be reported to the Trial Management Group (TMG), Trial Steering Committee (TSC) and Data safety Monitoring Committee (DMC). TSC and DMC reports must include data regarding deviations in accordance with SOP 33: Trial Steering Committees and Data Monitoring Committees. In addition, deviations should be included and considered when producing the final CONSORT diagram, which describes how such deviations have been handled during analysis, and their impact on patient safety and the conduct of the analysis reported in the applicable Study Report (SOP 16: Analysis). 4.2 Serious Breaches A serious breach is defined as a breach of the protocol or of the conditions or principles of Good Clinical Practice (or equivalent standards for conduct of non-ctimps) which is likely to affect to a significant degree the safety or physical or mental integrity of the trial subjects, or the scientific value of the research. For CTIMPs, Where it is confirmed that a Serious Breach of the trial protocol or GCP has occurred, or there is uncertainty, the CI must complete the MHRA s Notification of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol Form, the current version of which is available on the MHRA s Website and send it to the Research Integrity Office (via research.governance@keele.ac.uk). The MHRA and NHS REC must be notified of a confirmed serious breach within 7 calendar days of becoming aware of the breach. The Research Integrity Manager will notify the MHRA GCP Inspectorate of the serious breach via the provided on the MHRA website using the notification form which the CI has completed. If there are any queries the Research Integrity Manager, as sponsor representative, will telephone the MHRA Inspectorate to discuss the serious breach. The CI must also notify the Research Ethics Committee of the serious breach via . The Research Integrity Office will continue to be the contact for the allocated MHRA Inspector. [FOR25.6 Serious Breach Submission] will be used by the Research Integrity Manager to record serious breach submission information. The Research Integrity Manager will notify the Head of Academic Legal Services and Head of Research Integrity. Consideration will be made regarding notifying the University s insurance broker. For serious breaches in non-ctimps the CI must notify the NHS REC. Time lines for reporting of serious breaches in non-ctimps are the same as those for CTIMPs. Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 11 of 13

12 The CI must respond with urgency to any actions or queries relating to a serious breach. 4.3 Non-compliance Data The data collated by the Research Integrity Office regarding non-compliance events for all health and social care research studies, whether CTIMP or not, will be reviewed for trends and to identify any critical activity that may require further training or an audit to be performed. 5. Key Personnel to whom this SOP Applies 1 2 Responsibility of All staff to which SOP applies Chief Investigator Undertaken by Users of SOP Chief Investigator (with support of Research Integrity Manager) Activity Identification of non-compliance with trial protocol and /or GCP and highlighting to the Trial Manager/Study Coordinator and CI Assessment Assessment of impact of non-compliance on participant safety and scientific integrity of the trial Escalation of any non-compliance that is potentially a serious breach of the trial protocol or GCP Completion of MHRA s Notification of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol Form as required Reporting of confirmed Serious Breaches to the NHS REC Oversight of agreed Corrective and Preventative Action Plans [FOR26 - Corrective and Preventative Action Plan] Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 12 of 13

13 Responsibility of Undertaken by Trial Manager/Study Coordinator (with support of, CI and Research Integrity Manager) Activity Maintenance of record of all non-compliance occurring within the trial Investigation into instances of non-compliance Reporting Reporting confirmed and potential serious breaches to the CI and Research Integrity Office for assessment Supporting the CI in completion of serious breach report for submission to MHRA and REC Development and implementation of Corrective and Preventative Action plan [FOR26 - Corrective and Preventative Action Plan] as agreed with all parties 3 Sponsor Research Integrity Office Support CIs and trial teams in investigations into non-compliance Maintenance of a central University record of all non-compliance across all trials Support CIs and trial teams to develop appropriate corrective and preventative action plans [FOR26 - Corrective and Preventative Action Plan] as necessary Report confirmed serious breaches to MHRA on behalf of the University within regulatory timeframes Point of contact for MHRA for correspondence relating to serious breach reports Report all non-compliances assessed as potential serious breaches to the Head of Academic Legal Services and the Head of Research Integrity. Report all non-compliances and CAPA plans (if appropriate) to the appropriate University Committee(s) Ref: KCTU/SOP21/v4.0/27-Oct-2017 Page 13 of 13