The 18-week wait programme
|
|
- Della Greene
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Large scale workforce change briefing The 18-week wait programme Findings, successes and learning from NHS Employers large scale workforce change 18-week programme This Briefing summarises some of the findings, successes and learning from NHS Employers large scale workforce change (LSWC) 18-week wait programme. The programme ran from August 2006 to June 2007, with 25 trust teams participating in service and workforce redesign to develop effective pathways for patients, with the aim of achieving the 18-week target. All teams achieved this target in the areas on which they focused. This Briefing details the evidence and learning achieved by trusts on this programme, successes achieved and how these were obtained, and some top tips for success at achieving the 18-week target. It will be particularly useful for board members and those responsible for delivering the 18-week target in NHS organisations. Key findings Within ten months, all teams using the methodology and skills taught by the LSWC programme achieved the 18-week target in the areas on which they chose to focus. Teams reported significant reductions in waiting times. On average, teams reported a ten-week or 63 per cent reduction in waiting times. The greatest reduction in waiting times achieved on the programme was 30 weeks. Some teams, who started the programme with an already-lower waiting time than most trusts, reported a 92 per cent reduction in their waiting times. After ten months, nine teams appropriately removed 4,000 people from their combined waiting list an average of 61 per cent across their waiting lists. The greatest reduction achieved by one team was 1,000 patients an average of 78 per cent. Even the least reduction achieved was still very significant, at 15 per cent of the organisation s waiting list. The trusts did not have to invest heavily in introducing new roles or spend funds on new equipment. Many of the improvements achieved resulted from simply looking at processes and systems and revising and updating them. A part of the NHS Confederation working on behalf of the NHS Employers
2 Background The Government introduced the 18-week target in 2005, which was to deliver an 18-week patient pathway from GP referral to the start of treatment by the end of The LSWC programme, run by NHS Employers, aimed to support trusts in achieving this target by enabling them to develop local improvements and solutions to achieve their targets. How was this achieved? The LSWC methodology, which has had significant success and has helped make huge service impacts in the NHS in the past, was used to support teams to deliver service improvements. This programme adopted and adapted experiences from previous programmes, and provided the workforce and service with redesign solutions to enable the teams to meet their organisation s needs. The teams were taught improvement skills and diagnostics, given service and role redesign training and were assisted in measuring their progress, outcomes and the impact of the changes made at their organisation. What was needed The trusts did not have to invest heavily in the introduction of new roles or spend funds on the introduction of new equipment. Many of the improvements achieved by trusts through the LSWC programme resulted from simply looking at the processes and systems that their organisations had developed historically, and then revising and updating them. Additionally, ensuring current policies and procedures were implemented effectively helped trusts to achieve significant reductions in both waiting times and waiting lists. What approach was taken Teams on the programme used various methods to bring about their improvements. Some teams took a health community approach to redesign the patient pathway, engaging all major stakeholders. The majority of the teams decided to look at patient pathways through individual departments across a range of specialties, including neurophysiology, radiology, cardiology, orthopaedics and cholecystectomy. All teams carried out process mapping and capacity and demand profiling to examine the working practices throughout their chosen departments. Carrying out small-scale changes enabled teams to ensure they had the right people doing the right job at the right time. Many of the improvements involved new ways of working and service redesign rather than the introduction of new roles. Many trusts took the approach of validating waiting lists. In many cases this simply involved removing patients who were on the list twice, appropriately removing individuals where there was no clinical need identified and working with clinicians to ensure that only appropriate referrals were received. Additionally some trusts assessed where patients did not turn up for clinic appointments. Some teams found that patients had been given up to seven repeat appointments even though they had not attended any previously-arranged appointments. Once this issue was resolved appropriately, with patients needs as a priority, it reduced the amount of wasted clinic slots that could then be offered to other patients, freeing up the waiting lists. 2
3 Sharing the learning to achieve the 18-week target Top ten tips Much was learned during the programme, as trusts improved and redesigned services to ensure that patients were given a better experience. Here we share some learning from the programme to support you in meeting your own 18-week target. If you cannot do anything else to help achieve the target, ensure that you put these ten steps in place to achieve short and long-term benefits within your organisation. 1. Validate your waiting lists and ensure systems are in place to stop errors reoccurring. This ensures only patients who require treatment are recorded on your waiting list. 2. Manage your do not attends (DNAs) and cancellations effectively and ensure that current polices in this area are followed. This will mean you do not waste clinic slots with repeat offenders, which frees up your waiting lists. 3. Gain ownership for service improvement within your department by ensuring all the clinical team, including consultants, are engaged. Evidence from the programme suggests that service improvement won t happen without this level of engagement. 4. Understand your departmental activity by carrying out a capacity and demand profile (you can get help with this from the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement at This will ensure that you are using all your resources to their full potential. 5. Map the full patient pathway from referral to treatment and make sure you identify all the stakeholders involved. Without their engagement it will be difficult to make progress. 6. Establish full or partial booking systems across pooled waiting lists to reduce the number of patients waiting. Giving patients choice leads to fewer of them not attending. 7. Look to develop your support staff by reviewing job descriptions as administration processes are essential. Evidence from the programme suggests that many clinical staff undertake clerical duties at the expense of their clinical duties, which reduces the effectiveness of the service. 8. Ensure good quality information systems and measurements are in place to identify areas for improvement and to monitor progress. 9. Ensure timely and appropriate communication to highlight what you are trying to achieve and what you do actually achieve. Good quality information shared with the appropriate people will show you where to target activity to achieve the most significant improvements. 10. Patient education is essential when significant reductions have been achieved, otherwise DNA rates and patient anxiety will increase. Evidence from the programme indicates that patients fear they are acutely ill if they are called back for appointments within a short time. Therefore, there needs to be education for patients on this new way of working and the impacts it has on them. 3
4 Successful case studies Some of the teams achieved tremendous and significant results after ten months of learning on the LSWC programme, with very little investment. Here we describe some of the trusts results and learning to show what they did, how they did it and what they achieved as a result. Every participating team s case study can be found at NHS Employers website Barts and The London NHS Trust Barts and The London NHS Trust is an acute trust with 1,100 beds, serving a population of 5,000. The team on the programme focused on meeting the 18-week target in the area of neurophysiology. By the end of the programme in April 2007 this had been reduced to only ten weeks, both meeting the 18-week target and reducing waits for patients by an incredible 30 weeks. What they achieved They reduced the size of the waiting list and the amount of time patients had to wait for treatment, as well as reducing DNA rates. When the team began the programme in June 2006, the waiting time for patients to get treatment was 40 weeks. By the end of the programme in April 2007 this had been reduced to only ten weeks, both meeting the 18-week target and reducing waits for patients by an incredible 30 weeks. In June 2006, the waiting list had 1,350 patients on it and after improvements made over ten months The trust had appropriately removed 1,050 patients off its waiting list. on the programme, the trust had appropriately removed 1,050 patients off its waiting list. Other benefits included more engagement from consultants and other clinical staff and a 50 per cent reduction in non-attendees at the outpatient clinics. How they achieved it The team used a number of ways to achieve their target. They: validated waiting lists and developed models to achieve defined 2007 and 2008 targets managed their planned reductions by using an evidence-based approach reconfigured their booking system created advanced training slots for specialist registrars (SpRs) to increase clinic slots enhanced extended roles for clinical physiologists and clinical scientists refined IT systems interacted closely with main service users to improve communication and referrals redefined service contracts where appropriate to reflect the work being undertaken and ensure the appropriate income levels were received. Benefits achieved for patients and staff Not only did the LSWC programme ensure that the 18-week target was achieved, the following 4
5 improvements made throughout the programme also benefited patients and staff: closer management of outpatient slots made it easier for staff to feel in control of waiting times and lists improved triage of referrals based on clinical prioritisation enabled the most appropriate patients to be treated earlier more effective use of resources better matched capacity to demand fewer telephone enquiries from patients meant that staff were able to focus on their clinical duties, improving care for patients reported enhanced patient satisfaction within the clinical service improved both staff morale and showed that patients were happy with the care they had received improved appointment system through partial bookings reduced the DNA rates and ensured patients had choice over when to be seen reduced waiting times meant patients got treated quicker, improving their overall health and well-being. The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust is a large acute trust with 660 beds and a 340,000 population. The team focused on achieving the 18-week target through the echocardiography department. What they achieved They reduced the time that patients had to wait for treatment and reduced the number of patients waiting for treatment. In August 2006, the waiting time for patients was 21 weeks, but by the end of the programme in June 2007 there was no waiting time. It is worth mentioning that although this is clearly a great achievement for the trust, having no waits requires a different way of planning services and some education of patients. Some patients found that being offered their treatment immediately increased their anxiety as they were expecting some time to get used to the idea of treatment, and by being told they were to receive treatment straight away caused them to believe that they were seriously ill. Therefore this requires some education of patients. The trust reduced the number of patients waiting for treatment from 414 in August 2006 to 66 in February Through the programme they achieved their access target (which was their own trust s target) for diagnostics in this department and overall reduced the backlog in clinics. How they achieved it The trust achieved their successes on the programme in various ways. They: appointed a new echocardiography manager to manage the department introduced a new referral form, which meant that the number of inappropriate referrals were reduced introduced a better balance between inpatient and outpatient activity to match demand. Staff experienced improved working lives from being able to leave clinics on time and having reduced stress. 5
6 Patients did not have to wait as long for their treatment, if at all. Benefits achieved for patients and staff Patients and staff at the trust also benefited from the improvements made. staff experienced improved working lives from being able to leave clinics on time and having reduced stress staff experienced greater job satisfaction because they no longer had to deal with inappropriate patients or inappropriate clerical duties patients did not have to wait as long for their treatment, if at all there was a more rapid diagnosis of patients conditions in the future patients may benefit from the possible of introduction of a one-stop echocardiography service, due to evidence gathered on the programme to support this initiative. The Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust This acute trust has 1,011 beds and serves a population of 300,000. The team focused on achieving the 18-week target through the urodynamics department. What they achieved They significantly reduced both the size of the waiting list and the amount of time patients had to wait for treatment. In June 2006 there were 69 patients waiting over 13 weeks from referral to treatment. By March 2007 this had been reduced to only two through simple changes. Additionally 96 patients were removed from the waiting list for treatment between June 2006 and March 2007, due to small improvements made to processes. Other benefits realised by the trust included improved staff morale and a reduction in patients not attending clinics. How they achieved it They achieved these results through: implementing a do not attend policy validating their waiting lists merging three waiting lists so that overall they were managed more effectively identifying a second practitioner and training them to support the team implementing partial booking systems responding to suggestions made in the patient survey sending patient information leaflets with partial booking letters, to educate patients. Staff were developed and new skills were learned. Benefits achieved for patients and staff Patients and staff both benefited in different ways: staff were developed and new skills were learned succession planning was introduced to manage staff expectations 6
7 Patients experienced improved waiting times and choices, along with quicker diagnosis. staff felt more able to provide a higher quality of care fewer patients not attending meant staff were able to see and treat more patients patients experienced improved waiting times and choices, along with quicker diagnosis. Conclusion All trusts were able to achieve the 18-week target in the areas on which they focused throughout the programme. With very little investment, by making simple improvements trusts significantly reduced their waiting lists and waiting times for patients within ten months. Across the programme, trust waiting lists were reduced by an average of ten weeks and in nine trusts 4,000 patients were appropriately removed from their combined waiting lists. To achieve this, the trusts did not have to invest heavily in introducing new roles or spend funds on new equipment. Many of the improvements achieved by trusts through the LSWC programme resulted from simply looking at the processes and systems that their organisations had developed historically, and then by revising and updating them. There is some significant and important learning that other trusts can benefit from, as a result of this programme. More information, including case studies, are available on our website at Future work Although many of the teams have made significant improvements while working on the programme, all of the team leaders recognise that their work must continue if the improvements are to be sustained. Many of the teams are transferring the working models they have developed through the programme to other areas to bring about improvement. They are also utilising the skills and methodologies learned through the programme in other work areas to bring about further improvements. Further information If you would like to find out more about how the LSWC programme was run and the achievements and learning realised, contact Ian Pritchard, programme lead at ian.pritchard@nhsemployers.org You can find good practice case studies from all participating trusts on NHS Employers website at along with more about the programmes the large scale workforce change team are running this year. 7
8 NHS Employers NHS Employers is responsible for workforce and employment issues, working on behalf of NHS organisations in England. We help employers improve the working lives of NHS staff as a path to better patient care. We represent employers views and act on their behalf in the current priority areas of: pay and negotiations planning and workforce productivity employer of excellence HR policy and practice. NHS Employers is part of the NHS Confederation the independent membership body for the full range of organisations that make up the modern NHS. Contact us For more information on how to become involved in our work, getinvolved@nhsemployers.org NHS Employers 29 Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DD 2 Brewery Wharf Kendell Street Leeds LS10 1JR When you have finished with this briefing please recycle it This Briefing is available in pdf format at Published July 2007 NHS Employers This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. The NHS Confederation (Employers) Company Ltd Registered in England. Company limited by guarantee: number This briefing is printed on 75% recycled paper Ref: EBR103401
Briefing 73. Preparing for change: implementing the new pre-registration nursing standards
September 2010 Briefing 73 The new standards for education from the Nursing and Midwifery Council provide the framework for pre-registration nurse education programmes and will determine how we train our
More informationQOF Quality and Productivity (QP) Indicators. Supplementary Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions for PCTs and Practices in England
QOF Quality and Productivity (QP) Indicators Supplementary Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions for PCTs and Practices in England May 2011 Contents Introduction 2 Summary of QP indicators 3 Prescribing
More informationEVIDENCE BASE EMPLOYING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES IN THE NHS
MARCH 2018 EVIDENCE BASE EMPLOYING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES IN THE NHS Introduction NHS Employers continually engages with NHS organisations to develop the support available to members of the Armed
More informationMaximising the role of physiotherapists in delivering occupational health services
May 2008 Briefing 44 Maximising the role of physiotherapists in delivering occupational health services Musculoskeletal problems (MSDs) and resulting sickness absence are a major problem for all employers.
More informationNHS Employers Health and well-being. Your occupational health service
NHS Employers Health and well-being Your occupational health service April 2012 Introduction Occupational health (OH) is a specialised clinical service that provides clear benefits to staff and patients,
More informationBriefing. NHS Next Stage Review: workforce issues
Briefing NHS Next Stage Review: workforce issues Workforce issues, and particularly the importance of engaging and involving staff, are a central theme of the NHS Next Stage Review (NSR). It is the focus
More informationCoordinated cancer care: better for patients, more efficient. Background
the voice of NHS leadership briefing June 2010 Issue 203 Coordinated cancer care: Key points There are two million people with cancer in the UK. It is suggested that by 2030 there will be over four million
More informationThe PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes
The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes This Guide has been produced by the NHS Modernisation Agency. For further information on the Agency or the 10 High Impact Changes please visit www.modern.nhs.uk
More informationDelivering surgical services: options for maximising resources
Delivering surgical services: options for maximising resources THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND March 2007 2 OPTIONS FOR MAXIMISING RESOURCES The Royal College of Surgeons of England Introduction
More informationRecommendations for safe trainee changeover
Recommendations for safe trainee changeover Introduction Doctors in training in the UK have historically started new six-monthly rotations in February and August, with the majority of junior doctors rotating
More informationNHS Employers Health and well-being. Commissioning occupational health services
NHS Employers Health and well-being Commissioning occupational health services April 2012 Introduction Occupational health (OH) is a specialised clinical service that provides clear benefits to staff and
More informationBackground. The informatics review set out to do three things:
the voice of NHS leadership briefing AUGUST 2008 ISSUE 170 The 2008 Health Informatics Review Key points Lack of progress with key aspects of the National Programme for IT, particularly the NHS Care Records
More informationBAck in work Further quick links. Part six of the Back in work back pack. UPDATED march 2014
Further information and quick links Part six of the UPDATED march 2014 The : further information and quick links 1 march 2014 Back in work Contents Resources 3 Legislation and regulations 3 NHS Employers
More informationRTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning
RTT Assurance Paper 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide assurance to Trust Board in relation to the robust management of waiting lists and timely delivery of elective patient care within
More informationNHS. Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services. NHS Improvement - Diagnostics. NHS Improvement Diagnostics CANCER
CANCER NHS NHS Improvement Diagnostics DIAGNOSTICS HEART LUNG STROKE NHS Improvement - Diagnostics Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services Top tips to overcome the challenge
More informationBetter Healthcare in Bucks Reconfiguring acute services
service redesign case study March 2013 No. 3 Reconfiguring acute services Key points Reach a shared understanding of the case for change across the local health economy. Start public engagement as early
More informationCHAPTER TWO: WAITING LISTS AND BOOKING
TWO: INTRODUCTION Managing waiting lists 2.1 Sometimes it seems that the NHS is primarily about waiting lists. Public perception focuses on waiting lists. Waiting lists provide media headlines. For those
More informationProviding specialist emergency care in Northumbria
service redesign case study March 2013 No. 4 Providing specialist emergency care in Key points Evidence suggests that more centralised, seven-day working offers opportunities to improve care pathways and
More informationservice users greater clarity on what to expect from services
briefing November 2011 Issue 227 Payment by Results in mental health A challenging journey worth taking Key points Commissioners and providers support the introduction of Payment by Results for adult mental
More informationWAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE
Agenda Item Meeting of Lanarkshire NHS Board 28 April 2010 Lanarkshire NHS board 14 Beckford Street Hamilton ML3 0TA Telephone 01698 281313 Fax 01698 423134 www.nhslanarkshire.org.uk WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE
More informationOur NHS, our future. This Briefing outlines the main points of the report. Introduction
the voice of NHS leadership briefing OCTOBER 2007 ISSUE 150 Our NHS, our future Lord Darzi s NHS next stage review, interim report Key points The interim report sets out a vision of an NHS that is fair,
More informationLEARNING FROM THE VANGUARDS:
LEARNING FROM THE VANGUARDS: STAFF AT THE HEART OF NEW CARE MODELS This briefing looks at what the vanguards set out to achieve when it comes to involving and engaging staff in the new care models. It
More information5. Does this paper provide evidence of assurance against the Governing Body Assurance Framework?
Item Number: 6.3 Governing Body Meeting: 4 February 2016 Report Sponsor Anthony Fitzgerald Director of Strategy and Delivery Report Author Anthony Fitzgerald Director of Strategy and Delivery 1. Title
More informationNHS GRAMPIAN. Local Delivery Plan - Section 2 Elective Care
NHS GRAMPIAN Local Delivery Plan - Section 2 Elective Care Board Meeting 01/12/2016 Open Session Item 7 1. Actions Recommended The NHS Board is asked to: Consider the context in which planning for future
More informationEfficiency in mental health services
the voice of NHS leadership briefing February 211 Issue 214 Efficiency in mental health services Supporting improvements in the acute care pathway Key points As part of the current focus on improving quality,
More informationVisit report on Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust
South West Regional Review 2016 Visit report on Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust This visit is part of the South West regional review to ensure organisations are complying with the standards and requirements
More informationImproving Healthcare Together : NHS Surrey Downs, Sutton and Merton clinical commissioning groups Issues Paper
Improving Healthcare Together 2020-2030 NHS Surrey Downs, Sutton and Merton CCGs Improving Healthcare Together 2020-2030: NHS Surrey Downs, Sutton and Merton clinical commissioning groups Surrey Downs
More informationNHS 111 urgent care service
NHS 111 urgent care service Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Contents Background 2 Operational 3 NHS Direct 5 999 5 101 6 Training 7 Service Impact 7 Telephony 8 Marketing 8 1 Background Why are you introducing
More informationImplementation of the right to access services within maximum waiting times
Implementation of the right to access services within maximum waiting times Guidance for strategic health authorities, primary care trusts and providers DH INFORMATION READER BOX Policy HR / Workforce
More informationA Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges
Institute for Innovation and Improvement A Step-by-Step to Tackling your Challenges Click to continue Introduction This book is your step-by-step to tackling your challenges using the appropriate service
More informationAnnual Complaints Report 2014/15
Annual Complaints Report 2014/15 1.0 Introduction This report provides information in regard to complaints and concerns received by The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust between 01/04/2014 and 31/03/2015.
More informationTherapeutic Apheresis Services. User Satisfaction Survey. April 2017
Therapeutic Apheresis Services User Satisfaction Survey 2017 Claire Gillson Service Development Manager Therapeutic Apheresis Services Olivia Pirret National Administrator Therapeutic Apheresis Services
More informationImprovement and assessment framework for children and young people s health services
Improvement and assessment framework for children and young people s health services To support challenged children and young people s health services achieve a good or outstanding CQC rating February
More informationCity Hospitals Sunderland
City Hospitals Sunderland City Hospitals Sunderland has dedicated champions who work to support the Armed Forces community within the trust, both internally and externally, through engaging with NHS Employers
More informationOur response focuses on the following questions that we have asked of NHS employing organisations:
2 Brewery Wharf Kendell Street Leeds LS10 1JR Tel 0113 306 3000 www.nhsemployers.org Apprenticeship Targets for Public Sector Bodies Consultation Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Bay C, Level
More informationThe PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT
The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes A guide from NatPaCT DH INFORMATION READER BOX Policy HR/Workforce Management Planning Clinical Estates Performance IM&T Finance Partnership Working
More informationCommittee is requested to action as follows: Richard Walker. Dylan Williams
BetsiCadwaladrUniversityHealthBoard Committee Paper 17.11.14 Item IG14_60 NameofCommittee: Subject: Summary or IssuesofSignificance StrategicTheme/Priority / Valuesaddressedbythispaper Information Governance
More informationTransforming patient care to end waiting and changing lives
2009 WINNING CASE STUDY Best Public Sector and Best Operational Performance in the Public Sector Atos Consulting with NHS South Central Transforming patient care to end waiting and changing lives A ground-breaking
More informationReview of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015
Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board Audit year: 2014-15 Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015 Status of report This document has been prepared as part
More informationIntegrated respiratory action network for patients with COPD
Integrated respiratory action network for patients with COPD In this Future Hospital Programme case study Dr Helen Ward describes how a team from The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust established a respiratory
More informationThe UCLH Productive Outpatients Programme
The UCLH Productive Outpatients Programme A structured approach to engage, train and empower frontline staff to redesign and improve outpatient services Provided in partnership with NHS Elect Dr Gill Gaskin,
More informationSeven day hospital services: case study. South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust
Seven day hospital services: case study South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust March 2018 We support providers to give patients safe, high quality, compassionate care within local health systems that
More informationBackground and progress
the voice of NHS management briefing MARCH 2004 ISSUE 96 Electronic booking an initial guide to implementation Keeping abreast of IT Everyone who plays a leading or frontline role in the delivery of high-quality
More informationSouth Warwickshire s Whole System Approach Transforms Emergency Care. South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust
South Warwickshire s Whole System Approach Transforms Emergency Care South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust South Warwickshire s Whole System Approach Transforms Emergency Care South Warwickshire NHS
More informationThe operating framework for. the NHS in England 2009/10. Background
the voice of NHS leadership briefing DECEMBER 2008 ISSUE 172 The operating framework for the NHS in England 2009/10 Key points No new national targets. National priorities are the same as last year. but
More informationDiscussion Assurance Approval Regulatory information
Report to: Board of Directors Date of Meeting: 30 th September 2015 Report Title: Outpatient Report Status: Mark relevant box with X Prepared by: Executive Sponsor (presenting): Appendices (list if applicable):
More informationPerformance and Quality Report Sean Morgan Director of Performance and Delivery Mary Hopper Director of Quality Dino Pardhanani, Clinical Director
Sutton CCG Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Date Thursday, 06 September 2018 Document Title Lead Director (Name and Role) Clinical Sponsor (Name and Role) Performance and Quality Report Sean
More informationVisit to Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Yorkshire and the Humber regional review 2014 15 Visit to Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust This visit is part of a regional review and uses a risk-based approach. For more information on this
More informationBriefing on the first stage of the Acute Services Review the clinical recommendations
Briefing on the first stage of the Acute Services Review the clinical recommendations Introduction Over 100 clinicians from our four main hospitals, GPs, NHS managers and patient representatives have been
More informationGuidance notes on handover and review Faculty of Clinical Radiology
www.rcr.ac.uk Guidance notes on handover and review Faculty of Clinical Radiology 2 www.rcr.ac.uk Guidance notes on handover and review The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) is aware that the nature
More informationPhysiotherapy outpatient services survey 2012
14 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4ED Tel +44 (0)20 7306 6666 Web www.csp.org.uk Physiotherapy outpatient services survey 2012 reference PD103 issuing function Practice and Development date of issue March 2013
More informationMilton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Enter and View Review of Staff/ Patient Communication Ward 17 and 18 September 2017 Contents Contents... 2 1 Introduction... 3 1.1 Details of the
More informationNHS Pathways and Directory of Services
NHS Pathways and Directory of Services Core Narrative Purpose The NHS Pathways and the Directory of Services core narrative has been designed to support NHS communications leads and/or project managers
More informationImproving safety for lone workers. A guide for managers
Improving safety for lone workers A guide for managers February 2018 The Health, Safety and Wellbeing Partnership Group (HSWPG), has produced this advice to assist employers and managers in dealing with
More informationHealth and care services in Herefordshire & Worcestershire are changing
Health and care services in Herefordshire & Worcestershire are changing An update on a five year plan to provide safe, effective and sustainable care in our area www.yourconversationhw.nhs.uk Your Health
More informationUtilisation Management
Utilisation Management The Utilisation Management team has developed a reputation over a number of years as an authentic and clinically credible support team assisting providers and commissioners in generating
More informationReview of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Audit year: 2014-15 Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 487A2015 Status of report This document has been prepared as part
More informationDIVISION OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF ACUTE MEDICINE
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF ACUTE MEDICINE Ambulatory Care Unit Standard Operational Policy Document Control Reference No: First published: November 2014 Version: 004 Current Version Published:
More informationNew Medicine Service (NMS) data definitions
New Medicine Service (NMS) data definitions December 2013 The data reported to NHS England Area Teams (ATs) is designed to provide useful information to commissioners. The reporting periods for the New
More informationWe plan. We achieve.
We plan. We achieve. Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust has a lot to tell you... l Achievements of 2008/09 l Our plans for 2009/10 l Our commitments for the next five years. We are committed to providing
More informationIntroducing a 7-day service: the benefits of increased consultant presence
Introducing a 7-day service: the benefits of increased consultant presence This Future Hospital Programme case study comes from Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (WWL). Here, Dr Stephen
More informationTherapeutic Apheresis Services. User Satisfaction Survey. June 2016
Therapeutic Apheresis Services User Satisfaction Survey 2016 Claire Gillson Service Development Manager Therapeutic Apheresis Services Amy Clifford National Administrator Therapeutic Apheresis Services
More informationBARTS AND THE LONDON NHS TRUST TRUST BOARD MEETING
BARTS AND THE LONDON NHS TRUST TRUST BOARD MEETING Minutes of the open meeting of the Trust Board held on Wednesday 26 January 2005 at 11.30am in the Old Library, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Turner
More informationPATIENT ACCESS POLICY (ELECTIVE CARE) UHB 033 Version No: 1 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: Senior Manager, Performance and Compliance.
Reference No: PATIENT ACCESS POLICY (ELECTIVE CARE) UHB 033 Version No: 1 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: Trust 364 Documents to read alongside this Policy. Ministerial Letter EH/ML/004/09 WAG Rules for Managing
More informationMental Health URGENT CARE AND ASSESSMENT Business Case. CCG Summary paper
1. Purpose of this paper Mental Health URGENT CARE AND ASSESSMENT Business Case. CCG Summary paper This paper sets out the rationale for investment in new more effective urgent care pathways for people
More informationAn overview of Modernising Scientific Careers (Gateway Ref: 14943)
An overview of Modernising Scientific Careers (Gateway Ref: 14943) Why does healthcare science need to evolve? A combination of factors is driving the need for change in the education and training arrangements
More informationNHS GRAMPIAN. Grampian Clinical Strategy - Planned Care
NHS GRAMPIAN Grampian Clinical Strategy - Planned Care Board Meeting 03/08/17 Open Session Item 8 1. Actions Recommended In October 2016 the Grampian NHS Board approved the Grampian Clinical Strategy which
More informationStoryboard submission
Storyboard submission Follow the detailed instructions in this template for writing a description of your storyboard. Type your information in each section below and save this completed storyboard document
More informationHow to implement GP triage
CHANGE PACKAGE How to implement GP triage What is GP triage? Receptionists receiving calls from patients asking for a same-day appointment offer the option of a doctor ringing them back. A GP then contacts
More informationIslington Practice Based Mental Health Care: Roll-out plans and progress
Report to: Board of Directors (Public) Paper number: 3.2 Report for: Information Date: 26 th October 2017 Report author/s: Emily van de Pol, Divisional Director, Community Mental Health and Primary Care
More informationVANGUARD: Better Care Together
VANGUARD: Better Care Together Case study: Patient Initiated Follow-Ups (PIFU) Purpose: Patient initiated follow ups put the patient in control of any further outpatient appointments with consultants or
More informationcommunity links Intermediate Hostels Evaluating the Social Return on Investment community links hostels
community links Intermediate Hostels Evaluating the Social Return on Investment community links hostels Community Links Intermediate Hostels: Evaluating the Social Return on Investment About the Hostels
More informationHealth Select Committee Care Quality Commission accountability inquiry
Health Select Committee Care Quality Commission accountability inquiry NHS Confederation response, November 2016 About the NHS Confederation The NHS Confederation is the only body to bring together the
More informationCommissioning Policy
Commissioning Policy Consultant to Consultant Referrals Version 6.0 December 2017 Name of Responsible Board / Committee for Ratification: North Staffordshire CCG Stoke on Trent CCG Date Issued: November
More informationWolverhampton CCG Commissioning Intentions
Wolverhampton CCG Commissioning Intentions 2015-16 * Areas of particular focus and priority CI Ref Contract Provider Brief CI001 CI002 CI003 Child Protection Information Sharing Implement the new Child
More informationSummary of Responses to Open Ended Questions
Summary of Responses to Open Ended Questions Thank you for your patience in waiting for this rather long response. It covers a summary of all the open ended responses and is to be read alongside the original
More informationSTATEMENT OF PURPOSE August Provided to the Care Quality Commission to comply with The Health & Social Care Act (2008)
1. Trust Profile STATEMENT OF PURPOSE August 2015 Provided to the Care Quality Commission to comply with The Health & Social Care Act (2008) 1.1 Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust was formed on 1
More informationAmbulatory Emergency Care The Logical Way to Go
Ambulatory Emergency Care The Logical Way to Go Ambulatory Emergency Care The Logical Way to Go The Queens Medical Centre (QMC) is part of the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, one of the largest
More informationRedesigning maternity services in Sandwell and West Birmingham
service redesign case study May 2013 No. 5 in Sandwell and West Birmingham Key points Before developing options for service redesign, set out clearly the clinical case for change. Support clinicians in
More informationSharing your information to improve care
Sharing your information to improve care North West London health and care professionals are working together to provide your care. Those involved can see relevant information about you, so you can receive
More informationSeptember Workforce pressures in the NHS
September 2017 Workforce pressures in the NHS 2 Contents Foreword 3 Introduction and methodology 5 What professionals told us 6 The biggest workforce issues 7 The impact on professionals and people with
More informationAn improvement resource for the district nursing service: Appendices
National Quality Board Edition 1, January 2018 Safe, sustainable and productive staffing An improvement resource for the district nursing service: Appendices This document was developed by NHS Improvement
More informationAneurin Bevan University Health Board. Planning and Strategic Change Committee
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Planning and Strategic Change Committee A Meeting of the Planning and Strategic Change Committee was held on Tuesday, 19 th December 2014 in Seminar Room 4, Conference
More informationWe are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.
Inspection Report We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Highgate Medical Centre St Patricks Community Centre for Health,
More informationNOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST. PATIENT ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY (Previously known as Waiting List Management Policy) Documentation Control
NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST PATIENT ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY (Previously known as Waiting List Management Policy) Documentation Control Reference CL/CGP/026 Approving Body Senior Management
More informationHow are we doing? Adult Local Services at the heart of our community. Leisure Centre F RUIT & VEG
Leisure Centre How are we doing? 2016-17 F RUIT & VEG Adult Local Services at the heart of our community Our performance Angela Dawe and Sue Bowler Joint Directors for Operations and Strategic Development,
More informationPATIENT RIGHTS ACT (SCOTLAND) 2011 ACCESS POLICY FOR TREATMENT TIME GUARANTEE
NHS Board Meeting Tuesday 16 October 2012 Chief Operating Officer (Acute Services Division) Board Paper No. 12/45 PATIENT RIGHTS ACT (SCOTLAND) 2011 ACCESS POLICY FOR TREATMENT TIME GUARANTEE Recommendation:
More informationTitle: Climate-HIV Case Study. Author: Keith Roberts
Title: Climate-HIV Case Study Author: Keith Roberts The Project CareSolutions Climate HIV is a specialised electronic patient record (EPR) system for HIV medicine. Designed by clinicians for clinicians
More informationNational Cancer Patient Experience Survey National Results Summary
National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2015 National Results Summary Introduction As in previous years, we are hugely grateful to the tens of thousands of cancer patients who responded to this survey,
More informationNHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data
NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data 1 NHS Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Data July 2018 Monthly Report Version number: 1 First published: 13 th September 2018 Prepared by: Operational
More informationColorectal Straight To Test Pathway for 2 week wait referrals. Harriet Watson, Colorectal Consultant Nurse
Colorectal Straight To Test Pathway for 2 week wait referrals Harriet Watson, Colorectal Consultant Nurse 1 Background Traditional 2WW model Outpatient clinic within day 14 20 minute appointment but usually
More informationPersonal health record (PHR) case study.
Personal health record (PHR) case study Myhealth@QEHB Acknowledgements This case study is based on discussions with James Ferguson, consultant hepatologist and clinical lead for myhealth@qehb and with
More informationREFERRAL TO TREATMENT ACCESS POLICY
Directorate of Strategy & Planning REFERRAL TO TREATMENT ACCESS POLICY Reference: DCP175 Version: 7.0 This version issued: 17/12/15 Result of last review: Major changes Date approved by owner (if applicable):
More informationHow to write and review an access policy in line with best practice for referral to treatment and cancer pathways. July 2018
How to write and review an access policy in line with best practice for referral to treatment and cancer pathways July 2018 What is covered? Why is an access policy important? What is the purpose of an
More informationItem No. 9. Meeting Date Wednesday 6 th December Glasgow City Integration Joint Board Finance and Audit Committee
Item No. 9 Meeting Date Wednesday 6 th December 2017 Glasgow City Integration Joint Board Finance and Audit Committee Report By: Contact: Sharon Wearing, Chief Officer, Finance and Resources Allison Eccles,
More informationPatient Access Policy
Version Date Purpose of Issue/Description of Change Review Date 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.1 Status August 2009 December 2011 November 2014 November 2015 Interim Review Full review to ensure policy is up to date and
More informationDebbie Vogler, Director of Business & Enterprise. Kate Shaw, Associate Director of Service Transformation
Reporting to: Trust Board 24 September 2015 Paper 5 Title Sponsoring Director Author(s) Future Configuration of Hospital Services - Post-Project Evaluation Debbie Vogler, Director of Business & Enterprise
More informationCT Scanner Replacement Nevill Hall Hospital Abergavenny. Business Justification
CT Scanner Replacement Nevill Hall Hospital Abergavenny Business Justification Version No: 3 Issue Date: 9 July 2012 VERSION HISTORY Version Date Brief Summary of Change Owner s Name Issued Draft 21/06/12
More informationRapid improvement guide to appointment slot issues
Rapid improvement guide to appointment slot issues October 2017 This guidance provides information to help providers maintain high standards of clinical care by minimising and managing the number of patients
More informationAcceleration for ACS. NSTEMI Event 09 November. Outputs from Table Discussions
Acceleration for ACS NSTEMI Event 09 November Outputs from Table Discussions 1 1. What mechanism do we need to have to identify patients early (within 6 hours of admission to hospital)? Have identification
More information