Paper G1 BUSINESS CASE. Community Chronic Pain Service
|
|
- Cleopatra Wood
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Paper G1 BUSINESS CASE Community Chronic Pain Service 21st October 2015
2 INSERT TITLE OF BUSINESS CASE BUSINESS CASE 29 October 2015 Paper Page 2 of 33
3 1.0 Background information 1.1 Project Team Project Sponsor (SRO) Mark Eaton Project Lead (PM) Russell Foster Contract Lead Stephen Dixon Provider Lead Clinical Lead (CRO) Dr Mitch Garsin Finance Lead Christopher Perera Quality & Patient Engagement Lead Diana Garanito 1.2 Version Control Date Author Summary of Changes 21 st July 2015 Russell Foster First draft 20 th August Russell Foster Addition of case studies and appendices 28 th August Mark Eaton Edit by Mark Eaton, addition of financial modelling 8 th September Russell Foster Addition of further financial modelling data 23 rd Sept Russell Foster Further review of modelling data 28 th Sept Mark Eaton Additional editing and modelling data 14 th October Russell Foster/Chris Perera Updated modelling data 21 st October Russell Foster Additional project costs included 1.1 For PMO Use Approved By Date of Approval Location of File Finance Lead Budget Allocated Budget Code Budget Holder Delivery Plan Due Page 3 of 33
4 2.0 Executive Summary In June 2014, a Business Case was presented to HCCG Governing Body which requested agreement to the implementation of a Chronic Pain service model as recommended by the Hillingdon Pain Management Clinical Working Group (CWG). The CCG Governing body recommended developing a Community Chronic Pain service through a contract variation with THH. This has not been implemented, and activity remains high, along with costs, and the pathways remain fragmented. The three year MSK QIPP plan was based on implementing a fully integrated MSK CATS service. However, only Trauma and Orthopedic patients are being triaged and assessed by this service. The consequences are confused MSK services with inefficient cross service care and in many cases the creation of a revolving door for patients. Appendix 2 illustrates this pathway fragmentation in Hillingdon. HCCG has identified THH as being a significant outlier in terms of V48 and V54 Spinal procedures compared to all other secondary care pain centres in NW London. Following continuous informal negotiations since December 2014, a Contract Query Notice has been issued to resolve the problem. A joint Task and Finish Group is putting in place appropriate referral protocols, pathways and discharge criteria to bring the number of V48 and V54 Spinal procedures in line with the other seven NWL CCGs. HCCG has proposed a capped cost for annual V48 and V54 Spinal procedures to the North West London average which equates to a QIPP saving of over 300,000. THH have rejected this proposal. HCCG has also been negotiating an episodic cost for chronic pain services with THHFT since December A HCCG proposal which would produce a QIPP saving of 100,000 has also been rejected by THH. The case studies of other Community Chronic Pain services in Appendix 1 demonstrate that there are successful alternative solutions available. Soft market testing has shown that there is a market for innovative chronic pain service providers. Options Available 1. Do Nothing 2. Procure a new Community Chronic Pain Service 3. Implement a new Community Chronic Pain Service via a Contract Variation with THH Service Cost Comparisons Service Cost Comparison Cost 2016/17 Cost 2017/18 Cost 2018/19 OPTION 1 2,107,721 2,206,783 2,310,502 OPTION 2 1,781,854 1,464,404 1,392,200 OPTION 3 1,919,096 1,787,233 1,754,983 Page 4 of 33
5 QIPP Savings Comparisons QIPP Savings - Comparison Savings 2016/17 Savings 2017/18 Savings 2018/19 Three Year Savings OPTION 1 v OPTION 2 325, , , ,302 OPTION 1 v OPTION 3 188, , , ,520 Decision Required The Finance and QIPP Committee and Governing Body are invited to Support the proposed Option 2 below to enable a Community Chronic Pain service to be procured and implemented in 2016/17. Page 5 of 33
6 3.0 Purpose To compare the costs/benefits associated with either implementing a Community Chronic Pain service via a procurement, or by developing the secondary care Chronic Pain service that is already in place with THHFT. 4.0 Objectives 1. To ensure that GPs are supported to encourage patient prevention activities and self-care, and when appropriate, provide clear chronic pain pathways for onward referral. 2. To implement a community assessment and treatment service to ensure that patients are treated in the most appropriate place and given the treatment most appropriate to their needs. 3. To minimise the number of patients that are referred to secondary care for assessments and treatments that are not necessary. 4. To commission the service with a contract term of up to 5 years. 5. To implement this service by end of Quarter 2 in FY 2016/ Background Hillingdon MSK Services - The Current Position Spend on MSK services in 2014/15 was 23,451,948. This is reported by Trauma and Orthopedics; Chronic Pain; Rheumatology and Community Services Physiotherapy delivered by CNWL. The forecast spend reported under Chronic Pain is expected to be 2,013,105 in 2015/16. Appendix 2 shows how patients with chronic pain follow many different pathways of care, and potentially find themselves receiving treatment that clinically adds little or no benefit to their condition that is not cost effective. The Hillingdon MSK services activity can be broken down as follows: CNWL Physiotherapy This service operates under a block contract agreement with an annual cap on total activity of HCCG. Annual activity for 2015/16 is of 33,796. Average cost per activity of The service is based at seven sites across Hillingdon Borough, the majority of their patients are under 60 and mobile. The service refers some patients directly to the Pain Management CBT service but not to the CATS T &O service. THHFT Physiotherapy This service has a pain management specialist and takes referrals from GPs, and consultant referrals from other areas of THHFT secondary care, mainly T & O. There were 2552 GP referrals in 2014/15 and 9311 follow ups, with an average cost per activity of 44. There were a small number of referrals for management of either continence, balance or neurological problems. THHFT Pain Management CBT and Pain Centre The THHFT Pain Education and Management service offers both group and individual interventions. It received 498 referrals in 2014/15. The majority of referrals were received from other THHFT departments in particular the pain clinic and physiotherapy. GP referrals are low despite marketing to Hillingdon practices. Service users are offered an 8 week group Pain management Programme run weekly for 3 hours. The cost of this service is not separated from the Pain clinic costs see Table 1. Page 6 of 33
7 The Pain Clinic administers acupuncture and tens therapy and medicines review. GP first appointments to this service increased 19% year on year between 2013/14 and 2014/15, but total follow up appointments have only increased by 9% during the same period, indicating that some of these referrals may not have been necessary compared to the previous year. It is likely that a Community triage and assessment service including pain consultants, could have helped GPs both reduce total referrals and improve the quality of appropriate referrals to ensure that a higher proportion actually require follow up treatment. Rheumatology Services This is a relatively small service with 531 attendances in 2014/15 and new to follow up ratio of Growth has been relatively flat over the last three years. The service provides Injection clinics, Telephone services, general appointments and a small number of day case treatments. There is a GP advice service which provides advice directly to GPs on treatment options. The service previously had a clinical working group with clinicians from primary and secondary care which met over a period of time in 2013/14 The group was stopped when a decision was reached that Rheumatology required investment as opposed to delivering any cost savings. Anecdotal evidence suggests that there are some problems with the pathways to this service, for long waiting times for arranging biopsies via Rheumatology referrals. THHFT are currently recruiting an additional consultant. Pain Management CBT and Pain Centre This is a consultant led service that triages patients referred primarily by GPs and then books assessments with either Extended Service Practitioners (ESP) or with a consultant. Some patients are then referred on to THHFT Pain and Rheumatology services. There does not appear to be an agreed activity plan for this service for 2014/15, and the spend on this service appears under T&O in SUS and SLAM because there is no individual code for CATS T & O. The Case for Change The Community Chronic Pain business case in 2014 stated that the financial benefits would be driven by: A reduction in consultant outpatient first appointments, follow ups and procedures Implementation of a community tariffs model Reducing the number of revolving door patients Reduction in the use of medication, and more effective use of medication Since then the following issues have arisen: a) MSK first appointment outpatient activity has not only increased significantly since June 2014,) it has increased more per 1000 patient population than any other NW London CCG (Appendix 3). b) In the same period, follow up activity has decreased, suggesting that many patients may have benefitted from being treated in primary/community care rather than secondary care. c) THHFT has been identified as a clear outlier in terms of V48 (Thermal denervation of the spinal facet joint) and V54 (Injection around spinal facet of spine) procedures compared to other secondary care pain centres in NW London - see Appendix 6a and 6b. Page 7 of 33
8 Table 1 below shows the historic total spend (and spend at THHFT) on all V48 and V54 Joint injections normally administered to treat patients with chronic pain. Table 1 Spend Breakdown 2013/ /15 Year on Year Change Spend 4.7% growth Total HCCG Spend on V48 107, , % 157,543 Total HCCG Spend on V54 426, ,362 +2% 456,871 TOTAL 533, ,833 +9% 614,414 Spend with THHFT on V48 94, , % 140,164 Spend with THHFT on V54 367, ,438-5% 366,908 TOTAL 462, ,310 +5% 507,072 d) Between April 2014 and July 2014, 20 Hillingdon practices referred patients for 4 or more V48 or V54 pain procedures these patients therefore received on average one procedure every 4 months. e) Following a Contract Query Notice over the V48 and V54 outlier activity, THH has identified 622 patients that have remained in their Chronic pain service for at least 3 years without being discharged. f) THH and HCCG have not agreed an episodic cost for Chronic pain. The latest proposal submitted by THH will not contribute anything to the 2015/16 QIPP target. g) THHFT did not accept the previous service specification. They have challenged whether it is fit for purpose in the following areas: o o o o o o The discharge process is unclear The 4 week referral to assessment response time is unrealistic The KPIs are unclear and not standardised with other specialties The specification does not outline treatment thresholds or pathways The evidence base is out of date, as the 2009 NICE guidelines are being re-written The 7 day working specification requires further discussion to factor in an increase in activity Conclusions The increasing trend of MSK and Chronic Pain first appointments is financially unsustainable. The service specification must be updated a new draft has now been developed. Patients relying on spinal procedures may benefit from alternative treatment in the community. A solution must be found that is brought under contract with appropriate KPI reporting, and that integrates smoothly with the other MSK pathways. The case studies in Appendix 1 provide evidence that innovative, cost saving solutions are available from alternative providers. Page 8 of 33
9 6.0 OPTIONS 6.1 OPTION 1: Do Nothing ` BENEFITS There will be no additional clinical benefits to patients as the current service would not change. RISKS (No mitigations) Incumbent provider not incentivised to work with the health sector (particularly GPs) on more effective pathways and innovative approaches. Referral activity into secondary care for patients with pain related conditions continues to rise. Compound growth of this activity is 4.7% per year over the next 3 years (see Table 3). Service costs will increase in line with this activity increase. The number of patients referred into secondary care for spinal procedures who may otherwise have benefitted from alternative non-invasive treatment will continue to increase, adding to the revolving door patient numbers, which will adversely affect waiting times for other patients. Table 2: How Chronic Pain activity and costs remain in Secondary Care with OPTION 1. MSK SPECIALITY - Activity Baseline 2015/16 Activity 2016/17 Activity 2017/18 Activity 2018/19 Activity Acute FA 1,185 1,241 1,299 1,360 Acute FU 2,510 2,628 2,752 2,881 SECONDARY CARE CHRONIC PAIN: Procedures (smaller IP) 1,387 1,452 1,520 1,592 All other CHRONIC PAIN: Inpatients (Not including Spinal Injections) 1,114 1,166 1,221 1,279 CHRONIC PAIN V48/V54 Day Case Joint Injections Total Acute Activity 7,030 7,361 7,707 8,069 FA Community Service FU Community Service Total Community Activity MSK SPECIALITY - Cost Baseline 2015/16 Cost Cost 2016/17 Cost 2017/18 Cost 2018/19 Acute FA 245, , , ,618 Acute FU 242, , , ,624 SECONDARY CARE CHRONIC PAIN: Procedures (smaller IP) 52,350 54,810 57,387 60,084 All other CHRONIC PAIN: Inpatients 858, , , ,994 CHRONIC PAIN V48/V54 Day Case Spinal Injections 614, , , ,182 Total Acute Spend 2,013,105 2,107,721 2,206,783 2,310,502 FA Community Service FU Community Service Total Community Spend MSK SPECIALITY - Cost Baseline 2015/16 Page 9 of / / /19 Annual Cost 2,013,105 2,107,721 2,206,783 2,310,502 Transition Costs 0 Total Annual Costs 2,107,721 2,206,783 2,310,502
10 6.2 OPTION 2: Procure a new Community Chronic Pain service. This option was the alternative part of the recommended option in the original Community Chronic Pain service submitted to HCCG Governing Body in June The service would be put out to tender under a 3 year contract (+2 year Extension option), and subsequently mobilised after Quarter 1 in July How the new Community Chronic Pain Service will work The procurement will be based on the provision of a single point of access Community Chronic Pain service that consists of a consultant led multi-disciplinary team of pain, physiotherapy and psychotherapy specialists that triage, assess and treat patients in a community setting. Recent soft market testing, and dialogue with local clinicians has produced feedback on the following service elements: Use of mobile digital technology solutions to encourage more self-management. Use of online pain management programme tools. Use of Primary care tools such as STarT to aid GP decision-making. Including the provision of community based injection therapies. Criteria which clearly identify what procedures can be done in the Community and not in acutes. Support for GPs to improve prescribing standards. KPIs designed to track improvements in patients clinical outcomes. A pricing structure that is designed y to cap predicted activity and penalise activity under-performance. There would be a need to de-commission the THHFT Pain Clinic, the Pain Management CBT service, and all chronic pain related THHFT physiotherapy. HCCG would also need to consider moving the flow of chronic pain related activity to the CNWL community service contract, or merging the two physiotherapy services. The proposed Community Chronic Pain service pathway is illustrated in Appendix 5. BENEFITS It provides an opportunity to refine the specification which was developed in 2014 which does not reflect current best in class Community Chronic Pain services See Appendix 1 Case Studies. It provides an opportunity for the commissioner to formally engage with the market to explore best in class community based chronic pain services and associated commercial models. It will reduce the current avoidable steps and delays in the patient pathway. It will permanently reduce the number of new revolving door patients. It will reduce the number of patient referrals to secondary care. It will reduce the overall cost of the service by reducing overall activity and bringing the majority of the remaining activity into the community at a tariff below PbR. RISKS Decommissioning of some of the incumbent provider s chronic pain services leads to a deterioration of the relationship should it fail to win the bid, which affects the quality of other MSK services delivered by the provider. MITIGATION: HCCG continue to work collaboratively with THH and support them informally up to the point of formal procurement, and follow formal due process to prove that HCCG has acted in a fair and transparent manner. Page 10 of 33
11 The procurement process is delayed or stopped due to unforeseen circumstances (e.g. Government Policy; or local factors) which delays the new service implementation, and associated QIPP benefits are not realised against plan. MITIGATION: The Procurement Mobilisation Plan is revalidated and approved by the Finance and QIPP committee. Revolving Door patients must be appropriately discharged to the new community chronic pain service. There are 622 such patients who have been receiving spinal injections for at least 3 years by THH. Managing this transition without the appropriate resource will block the flow of patients into the new service. MITIGATION: A Transition cost of 90,000 has been estimated for moving revolving door patients out of hospital into the community. See Transition Cost Assumptions (page 11). Table 3: How Chronic Pain activity and costs move from Acute Care to the Community with OPTION 2. MSK SPECIALITY - Activity Baseline 2015/16 Activity 2016/17 Activity 2017/18 Activity 2018/19 Activity Acute FA 1, Acute FU 2,510 2,003 1, SECONDARY CARE CHRONIC PAIN: Procedures (smaller IP) 1,387 1, All other CHRONIC PAIN: Inpatients (Not including Spinal Injections) 1, CHRONIC PAIN V48/V54 Day Case Joint Injections Total Acute Activity 7,030 5,368 3,989 3,241 FA Community Service FU Community Service 827 1,925 2,494 Total Community Activity 1,441 2,857 3,416 MSK SPECIALITY - Cost Baseline 2015/16 Cost Cost 2016/17 Cost 2017/18 Cost 2018/19 Acute FA 245, , ,819 91,315 Acute FU 242, , ,941 72,964 SECONDARY CARE CHRONIC PAIN: Procedures (smaller IP) 52,350 41,880 37,690 37,690 All other CHRONIC PAIN: Inpatients 858, , , ,408 CHRONIC PAIN V48/V54 Day Case Spinal Injections 614, , , ,976 Total Acute Cost 2,013,105 1,425,491 1,123,132 1,003,353 FA Community Service 0 114, , ,795 FU Community Service 0 71, , ,053 Total Community Cost 186, , ,848 TOTAL COST 2,013,105 1,611,854 1,464,404 1,392,200 MSK SPECIALITY - Savings Page 11 of 33 Baseline 2015/ / / /19 Annual Cost 2,013,105 1,611,854 1,464,404 1,392,200 Procurement, Mobilisation and Transition Costs 170,000 Annual Savings against baseline 231, ,450 72,203
12 High Level MSK Activity Assumptions Although THH covers 83% of secondary care chronic pain, tthe new service will manage demand of all secondary care activity in the same way. THHFT Pain Clinic is de-commissioned and resource moved into the new Community Chronic Pain service at end of Qtr /17. Pain Clinic FAs are referred to the new service in Qtr 2, 3 and /17. Pain related THHFT Physiotherapy is de-commissioned and resource moved into the new Community Chronic Pain service from Qtr /17. THH Physiotherapy FAs are referred to the new service from Qtr /17. Pain Management Clinic (CBT) is de-commissioned and resource moved into the new Community Chronic Pain service from Qtr /17. Rheumatology and T & O activity is not affected. A reduction in analgesic and co-analgesic drug costs has not been calculated at this stage. Detailed Chronic Pain Activity Assumptions in Table 3 Baseline activity is assumed to be annual activity during 2014/15 plus 4.7% growth. FA and FU activity (into community) increases by 20% in year 1, reduces by 10% in years 2 and 3. Secondary Care Chronic Pain procedures decreases by 20% in year 1 and 10% in Years 2 and 3. All other Chronic Pain IP activity decreases by 20% in year 1 and then remains at zero growth. V48/V54 spinal injection activity decreases by 50% in year 1 and 25% in years 2 and 3. All spinal patient activity moving into the community is reduced by 50% i.e. for every two new patients treated in acute, only one new patient requires treatment in the community. All activity that is moved into the community is done so at 90% of PbR which is taken into account by annually rebasing the block contract. Transition Cost Assumptions in Table 3 The main transition cost will be as a result of moving revolving door patients out of hospital into the community service. Currently 622 patients have been identified by THH as being under secondary care chronic pain treatment for more than 3 years. By July 2016 (start of new Community Chronic Pain service mobilisation) there would still be 200+ revolving door patients, of which 50% could feasibly be moved into community care with an appropriate intensive treatment management plan during the three month mobilisation period. Provision of resource to provide this intensive treatment would be 600/patient: (100 x 600) = 60,000. The remaining 50% of patients could be moved into community care with a less intensive treatment management plan during the three month mobilisation period. Provision of resource to provide this intensive treatment would be 300/patient: (100 x 300) = 30,000. TOTAL TRANSITION COSTS: 90,000 Page 12 of 33
13 Procurement & Mobilisation Cost Assumptions in Table 3 Cost Rate Total Procurement support from SBS days 18,000 Internal Procurement Project Management interim day 60 36,000 rate plus Agency margin 600/day External clinical specialist support 4 x 0.5 2, per session Internal Service Mobilisation Project mamnagement 40 24,000 interim day rate plus Agency margin 600/day TOTAL 80,000 Therefore OPTION 2 Total additional costs in Year 1 = 170,000 Page 13 of 33
14 6.3 OPTION 3: Implement Community Chronic Pain service via contract variation. The new Community Chronic Pain service is implemented via a contract variation with incumbent provider, but the provider fails to deliver the required transformation in service delivery and achieves only half the QIPP savings delivered in OPTION 2. BENEFITS It will reduce the current avoidable steps and delays in the patient pathway. It will reduce the number of new revolving door patients, but by only half as well as OPTION 2. It will reduce the number of patient referrals to secondary care, but only half as much as OPTION 2. It will reduce the overall cost of the service by reducing overall activity and bringing the majority of the remaining activity into the community at a tariff below PbR, but only half as much as OPTION 2. Patients will benefit from the clinical improvements associated with implementing the new service: reduction in the cohort of revolving door patients; waiting times to community and secondary care would be reduced. QIPP savings would be sub optimal to OPTION 2 due to lack of incentive by the provider to reduce total chronic pain activity. The CCG maintains and improves the working relationship with THHFT around the joint long term development of a more integrated MSK service. RISKS Little incentive on the incumbent provider to change its invasive treatment culture. New service lapses towards the status quo, QIPP savings target not realised. MITIGATION: HCCG plan Continue to action and report weekly Task & Finish Group sessions and escalate any issues which block progress to senior management on both sides. THHFT refuse to agree the QIPP savings plan and do not sign the contract variation, status quo maintained. MITIGATION: HCCG uses soft market testing output to benchmark the service specification content, and share content with THHFT to achieve joint agreement to implement. Contract variation not agreed by THHFT unless it is based on payment by activity not outcomes. There is no incentive for the provider to manage demand. MITIGATION: There is no overall mitigation to the perverse incentives that this scenario will create other than strong contract performance management by both commissioner and provider. Page 14 of 33
15 Table 4: How Chronic Pain activity and costs move from Acute Care to the Community with OPTION 3 MSK SPECIALITY - Activity Baseline 2015/16 Activity 2016/17 Activity 2017/18 Activity 2018/19 Activity Acute FA 1,185 1, Acute FU 2,510 2,256 2,021 1,894 SECONDARY CARE CHRONIC PAIN: Procedures (smaller IP) 1,387 1,248 1,198 1,198 All other CHRONIC PAIN: Inpatients (Not including Spinal Injections) 1,114 1,002 1,002 1,002 CHRONIC PAIN V48/V54 Day Case Joint Injections Total Acute Activity 7,030 6,197 5,637 5,420 FA Community Service FU Community Service 574 1,227 1,354 Total Community Activity 1,012 1,759 1,893 MSK SPECIALITY - Cost Baseline 2015/16 Cost Cost 2016/17 Cost 2017/18 Cost 2018/19 Acute FA 245, , , ,277 Acute FU 242, , , ,190 SECONDARY CARE CHRONIC PAIN: Procedures (smaller IP) 52,350 47,103 45,215 45,215 All other CHRONIC PAIN: Inpatients 858, , , ,924 CHRONIC PAIN V48/V54 Day Case Spinal Injections 614, , , ,998 Total Acute Cost 2,013,105 1,718,435 1,581,287 1,536,604 FA Community Service 0 81,727 99, ,559 FU Community Service 0 49, , ,820 Total Community Cost 131, , ,379 TOTAL COST 2,013,105 1,850,096 1,787,233 1,754,983 MSK SPECIALITY - Savings Baseline 2015/ / / /19 Annual Cost 2,013,105 1,850,096 1,787,233 1,754,983 Mobilisation and Transition Costs 69,000 Annual Savings against baseline 94,009 62,862 32,251 Chronic Pain Activity Assumptions in Table 4 As the service would be operated by the incumbent provider, it is assumed, based on historic performance that all activity efficiencies will be achieved at 50% of the rate of OPTION 2. Page 15 of 33
16 Transition Cost Assumptions in Table 4 Transition costs do not include procurement, but only 50% of the 200 revolving door patients are moved back into the community, incurring 50% of the cost of OPTION 2. TOTAL TRANSITION COSTS: 90,000/2 = 45,000 Procurement & Mobilisation Cost Assumptions in Table 4 Cost Rate Total Procurement support from SBS Nil Nil Internal Procurement Project Management Nil Nil interim day rate plus Agency margin External clinical specialist support Nil Nil Internal Service Mobilisation Project 40 24,000 management interim day rate plus Agency margin 600/day TOTAL 24,000 Therefore OPTION 3 Total additional costs in Year 1 = 69, Preferred Option The recommendation to the Governing Body is to approve Option 2 which will not only provide the biggest improvements in patient benefits, but will provide the best value for money solution. See Section Implementing the Preferred Option Approach The high level approach to implementing the preferred option is summarised in Table 5 below: Table 5 Deliverable Activities Who Involved By When Review Existing services Complete Incumbent provider engagement Draft Specification Review existing QIPP targets, activity and spend, benchmark with local and UK CCGs. Research evidence base for future services. Review previous service strategy and what was delivered against targets. Collate all relevant data. Discuss performance of current services. Identify and rectify current issues. Share early commissioning intentions Review and update in light of benchmark intelligence Current providers, clinical lead, finance, informatics Incumbent providers, clinical lead, contract lead CCG Clinicians Complete Complete Page 16 of 33
17 Patient & public engagement Soft market Testing Complete detailed financial modelling Drive a full 12 week consultation: Draft & distribute patient questionnaire. Facilitate focus Groups. Illicit feedback from GPs. Present evidence based examples from other recent CCG Chronic Pain consultations Brief SBS. Create MOI, Provider Questionnaire, publish with Draft Spec on Contracts Finder, and assess level of market interest to inform market engagement strategy. Collate feedback, input to draft Spec Financial expectations/ efficiency targets/ investment funds identified. Activity levels identified. Financial implications on other services modelled. CCG Comms Team, Current providers, public, GPs SBS Informatics, Finance October 2015 Complete October 2015 Contracting Model proposed Obtain approval to proceed to procurement Develop Procurement Plan Formally engage market Plan and facilitate Bidder event Evaluate bids Approve contract award Notify Bidders Sign contract Mobilise contract Commence Service Clarify how intended service integrates with the MSK and other health economies. Define contract model and payment mechanisms. Submit and present Business Case to Governing Body for decision Governance arrangements, check conflicts of interest, identify panel members. Agree evaluation approach, bidder questions etc. Create internal comms plan. Finance, Clinical Lead, GPs Governing Body. SBS SBS, HCCG Team October 2015 November 2015 November 2015 Advertise tender on Contracts Finder + direct . SBS November 2015 Ensure comprehensive understanding by bidders SBS CCG Comms November about the service and procurement process. Team 2015 Brief panel members. Respond to clarification questions. Evaluate, moderate, record scores & rationale. Recommend preferred bidder to GB Engage with preferred bidder, send notification letters out, confirm end of standstill period Further engagement with preferred bidder, agree conditions precedent. Develop mobilization Plan. Ensure transparency of contract award Make ready for service commencement. Manage service transition. Complete Lessons Learned report SBS, Bid team CCG Governing Body Preferred bidder, SBS, CCG Comms team CCG Contracts Team, Preferred bidder, CCG Comms Team Preferred Bidder, CCG Team January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2016 End of June st July 2016 Page 17 of 33
18 7.0 Benefits Area Description of Measure/s Baseline Target Deadline Total QIPP Finance savings over 3 Reduction in Chronic Pain spend and years End of Qtr 4 activity in line with Business Case QIPP 2015/16 compared to 2020/21 targets. OPTION 1 of 788,302 Evidence of patients taking effective self-control of their condition (Via Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire) Quality Quantifiable improvements in patients perception of their pain (Via EQ5D/Start Back Tool) Patients having a positive outcome in their physical, psychological and/or social needs (Via Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). No baseline available at present 92.5% Average for all measures By end of Qtr 2 of Year 1 Contract Increase in patient s self-reported levels of functional gain (Via Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Safety Delivery against all agreed adult safe guarding protocols and procedures set out in service specification. NA 100% compliance Report to CCG monthly from month 1 of Contract Referrals to be seen and assessed by Triage team within specified lead time. 4 8 weeks 100% <4 weeks Performance All patients have an agreed PMP during first assessment OP to surgical procedure conversion rate 100% NA 100% 95% By end of Qtr 1 Year 1 Contract Other Patient Satisfaction SUI s, Complaints and Never Events Number of DNA s by New Appointment and Follow Up NA NA NA 90% satisfied minimum response rate of 30% 100% compliance <5% Report to CCG as necessary Monthly Page 18 of 33
19 8.0 Timescales See Section 5.5. Benefits will be delivered initially over the three year contract period, but with an option to extend by a further two years. 9.0 Finance Table 6 and 7 illustrate how the QIPP savings would compare with the other options by implementing Option 2 - Procure the new Community Chronic Pain Service. Table 6 Service Cost Comparison Cost 2016/17 Cost 2017/18 Cost 2018/19 OPTION 1 2,107,721 2,206,783 2,310,502 OPTION 2 1,781,854 1,464,404 1,392,200 OPTION 3 1,919,096 1,787,233 1,754,983 Table 7 Net QIPP Savings Comparison Savings 2016/17 Savings 2017/18 Savings 2018/19 Three Year Savings OPTION 1 v OPTION 2 325, , , ,302 OPTION 1 v OPTION 3 188, , , ,520 Conclusion Implementing Option 2 will deliver 788,302 more savings than Option 1, and 301,782 more savings than OPTION 3. Table 8 Funding Amounts ( 000s) Option 2 Funding Source Period Non-Recurrent Recurrent Cost Centre Initial Procurement & Mobilisation 80,000 tbc Year 1 Transition - Year 1 QIPP savings 90,000 tbc Year 2 Nil Year 3+ Nil Page 19 of 33
20 10.0 Risks, Issues and Dependencies 10.1 Risks (things that may happen) Risks Likelihood Impact Total Financial modelling assumptions for Option 2 cannot be reasonably validated, new service implementation delayed. MITIGATION: Continue to re-validate data assumptions with CCG Finance Team as new intelligence is gathered up to procurement Not enough potential bidders confirm that they can achieve financial balance against the service specification, procurement is delayed, new service implementation delayed. MITIGATION: Plan in an extended question & answer period with potential bidders during procurement to ensure bids are credible. HCCG decide choose Option 3, negotiate with incumbent to vary their contract, financial and clinical benefits do not materialise. MITIGATION: Continue to develop closer tactical and strategic working relationship with THH re MSK strategy to ensure minimum impact of pain activity and revenue being diverted elsewhere Issues (things that are already happening that need to be considered) Issues Mitigation Owner Contract Query Notice issued for THH being outlier for V48 & V54 spinal procedures. Informal negotiations with THH over Chronic Pain episodic costs have reached an impasse. Recent track record of MSK demand management by incumbent provider (e.g. T&O FA OP activity), and performance management of the MSK contract by the commissioner is poor. Identification of the real potential Chronic Pain activity and cost is difficult because some is referred to, and coded as T & O, Physio and Rheumatology. RAP Task & Finish Group progressing actions to address Continue to maintain dialogue and place on formal meeting agenda in order to progress to resolution (MSK CWG?) Operational relationship (regarding MSK services) with THH and HCCG is improving via more regular formal and informal dialogue. Working collaboratively with CNWL and THHFT to agree a best estimate of chronic pain activity flowing through physio, T & O and Rheumatology pathways. Russell Foster/ Derval Russell Russell Foster/Derval Russell Russell Foster/Derval Russell Russell Foster 10.3 Dependencies (things that this project is dependent upon) Dependency Impact on Project Owner Credible working assumptions of post contract Chronic Pain activity to inform the financial model. High if financial modeling leads to inaccurate estimate v post contract actual Russell Foster/Finance Strategic direction of travel re THH moving to ACO for all community services Timeline and details unknown at present Ceri Jacob Completion of patient/public engagement Procurement open to challenge if EIA is not completed Page 20 of 33 Russell Foster
21 11.0 Governance & Evaluation The CCG Executive has overall responsibility for the programme; its functions are to approve and sign off recommendations made by the Finance and QIPP Committee. This Committee will monitor the project s progress against plan and ensure that the risks and issues are appropriately managed. The Project Team will be put in place following the Governing Body decision, and is likely to consist, of the following members: Mark Eaton HCCG QIPP and Transformation Lead Russell Foster MSK Programme Lead Dr. Mitch Garsin MSK Clinical Lead Alex Long SBS Procurement support Chris Perera HCCG Finance Lead Emma-Jane Leslie HCCG Communications Lead Procurement Panel Lay members tbc Page 21 of 33
22 APPENDIX 1 CASE STUDIES IN CHRONIC PAIN SERVICES In considering the options available to HCCG, the following case studies illustrate how a community based model of care could deliver this solution. Case Study 1 Telford & Wrekin and Shropshire CCG This CCG ran a 12 month Pilot with a private sector provider - Pain Management Solutions, who then won a bid to provide a full triage assessment and treatment pain management service for NHS Telford & Wrekin and Shropshire in a primary care setting for patients with chronic non - cancer pain. They treat patients in a multi-disciplinary model and have access to a range of disciplines and interventions that can deal with the physical, psychological and social needs of patients with chronic pain. This includes spinal injections delivered in the community. During the Pilot the level of referrals to secondary care pain services dropped significantly. Waiting times were reduced and a large number of patients in secondary care who had been receiving long standing injection therapy were discharged back to their GPs. Pain Management Solutions contract with 18 UK CCG s and their current injection rate is averaging around 7% compared to a nationwide rate of 70%. The new service commenced in June 2015 and he provider is paid at 90% of National Tariff under a Local Variation approved by Monitor. Estimated annual spend on the services if the provider was paid for with the nationally determined price and currency would be 683,122. The CCG s estimated annual spend in 2015/16 with the local variation in place will be 522,201. This is an estimated annual saving of 23% which factors in the lower community tariff and the cost efficiencies of reduced activity to secondary care. The provider states that initially, referral numbers to the new service tend to be much higher in the first year due to the new service giving GP's access to evidence based Pain Management Programmes* (PMP) within the community, but injection rates are lower, with higher levels of 1:1 appointments and group pain management programmes. There is a low re referral rate of around 5% into their service (normally for patients whom repeated injections or top up acupuncture is appropriate). Current average spend per patient across their contracts is 667. Case Study 2 Somerset CCG Somerset CCG have worked collaboratively with Wiltshire CCG and the British Pain Society to implement a new pain pathway. The aim of the service is to enable adults who live with persistent pain, to understand and come to terms with their pain, and to adopt strategies for living, which allow them to lead as fulfilling and independent lives as possible. These aims of the service are achieved by service users gaining good health literacy, becoming activated and being supported to better self-manage. The service has four main components: The clinical service: Offers triage, assessment, personalised care planning and access to other services such as community physiotherapy and structured exercise programmes, plus: Specialist injection therapy is arranged with an appropriate provider where required Medication reviews User-led Pain Management Programmes Intensive psychologist-led Pain Management Programmes On-line self - management programmes with telephone coaching support One to one support through motivational interviewing Page 22 of 33
23 One to one intensive support from a psychologist practicing CBT As an exception, the consideration of the need to be referred to an inpatient pain management services and arranging this with an appropriate provider where required Referring service users on promptly where other pathologies suspected Facilitating discharge through a shared decision making format The collection and collation of service utilisation, effectiveness, safety and patient experience data Training and support: The service provides an ongoing and rolling training programme for GPs and other front line staff which aims to increase the knowledge and skills of these staff in supporting service users to confidently manage their persistent pain. The training programme covers the following: Develop service user perspectives Definitions, myths and misconceptions about persistent pain The cost of pain to individuals and the health economy The importance of service user empowerment, activation and self-management An overview of the Somerset model of care, the new service and how to access it Optimal analgesics Specialist injections and the Somerset Clinical Consensus on the use of injections for long term pain Case Studies Access to peer group support programmes: The service supports service users to attend a pain management group work program which uses licenced online tools to offer the benefits of tracking patient activity and pain scores, and even suggesting the best exercise to pursue based on the patients individual pain scores. For face to face therapy patients are given access to the Expert Patient Persistent Pain Programme (PPP) which is a self-management course for people living with day-to-day persistent pain. The course, through a process of discussion, peer support and supported goal setting and action planning helps participants learn how to deal effectively with the challenges of living with daily pain. It is delivered by trained and accredited tutors living with persistent pain themselves who have become confident self-managers of pain. The programme is run over six weekly sessions that deal with areas covered in the course such as: Overcoming common misconceptions, fears and beliefs about pain Acceptance and taking responsibility Pacing daily activities Stretching and exercising techniques where to begin Keeping a pain diary and tracking your progress Dealing with set backs Patient activation (knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage) is a primary outcome measure which is collated before and after the programme. Online support and signposting: Patients learn how to manage pain from other people who are already managing (so-called social modelling ). There are also disadvantages: Not all service users want to join a group The waiting time for a local programme can be many weeks Costs averages 300 per person who attends the programme Page 23 of 33
24 Skills attrition; the knowledge, skills and confidence to manage pain tend to erode over time unless support is ongoing To mitigate against these disadvantages, the service also offers: An on-line self-management programme ( Pathway through Pain ) An on-line personal organiser ( Know Your Own Health ) which is given to people to use whilst working with the service and after they have chosen to be discharged. Know Your Own Health contains a number of elements: A curated web-browser that helps people find personalised information about managing pain A local service directory- updated by service users Personal trackers to support people to track and maintain progress towards goals A social networking site- for people with pain in Somerset A structured support group, closely allied to Know Your Own Health1, but also offering the opportunity for ongoing face to face contact and structured lay-led support The care pathway can be found here The clinical lead worked with colleagues, service users and commissioners to develop a map of interventions across the care pathway and to describe an ideal pathway from the perspective of the service user. Disinvestment in low value interventions and investment into high value interventions were clearly described as a set of key performance indicators, subject to annual review. The commissioner agreed a capitated budget for the first 2 years of the new service, subject to performance review. 18 months into the transformation, all KPIs are on track, disinvestment in low value interventions has progressed satisfactorily and on a base budget of 1,000,000, over 250,000 has been saved. 20% of this is real saving and the rest has been re-invested in high value interventions; namely on-line services and group and peer-peer support. The system of financial incentives within the overall programme budget is an essential part of this innovation. Here is a Somerset s patient s account of her Pain Journey When I first attended the Somerset Community Pain Management Service, I was looking for a magic quick fix solution, a pain killer that would magically take the pain away. I have been suffering from chronic leg pain for a few years and was feeling at the end of my tether, with the pain dominating my life. The nurse explained to me the gateway of pain and that stress and negative thoughts increase the amount of pain you experience, and that the way forward would be through closing this gateway, using relaxation methods and pacing myself. I was put forward for the online Mindfulness programme, which I found enormously useful. It teaches you to live with it rather than fight it, through meditation exercises, relaxation, mind retraining exercises, awareness of sensation and pacing activity. It s not a quick fix and it s an ongoing learning curve and I still have pain when I over do things but I feel more confident about being in control of it and the affect it has on my life. I feel more positive Page 24 of 33
25 about the future now, being able to work with the pain rather than fight against it. Accepting it and pacing myself more, I do feel more back in control. When I have a flare up, I have learnt to accept, meditate, relax and pace myself and sure enough I feel much better and in control again. I think the secret is getting in control again rather than feeling it s controlling you. You feel back in the driver s seat. Case Study 3 Notingham CCG Nottingham CCG commission a similar model of chronic pain care to Somerset. The Nottingham Back and Pain Team use a bio psychosocial approach to treat patients with longstanding pain. The team comprises physiotherapists, nurses, occupational therapists, cognitive behavioral therapists and psychologists. The service forms part of the local pain management pathway, providing an additional management tier for those patients who no longer benefit from primary care intervention, but do not require secondary care for therapeutic treatments. Fig 1 Pain Management Pathway for Nottingham CCG patients. Page 25 of 33
26 Case Study 4 Pennine MSK Partnership Pennine MSK Partnership is a service that has been commissioned by Oldham CCG for several years to provide care for the patients of Oldham in orthopedics, rheumatology and chronic pain in a community setting across several sites in and around Oldham. This organisation was the first in the UK to deliver an integrated MSK service under a prime contractor model (for Oldham CCG). This model has an innovative approach of the provider taking on financial and clinical accountability for the whole MSK pathway, including secondary care, by agreeing a programme budget for the entire contract period. Pennine MSK Partnership is part of a collaborative partnership with the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, and the Psychological Medicine Service at Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, which in June this year implemented a new joined up patient centred Community Pain service. This service puts the emphasis on supporting people to make informed decisions, manage their care and have an improved quality of life. The new three tier service is run by a highly experienced multi-disciplinary team of health professionals who are all specialists in pain, including Pain Specialist Nurses, Pain Specialist Physiotherapists, Cognitive Behaviour Therapists, and Clinical Psychologists supported by Pain Consultants and Liaison Psychiatrists where necessary. Tier one will be coordinated by the patient's GP practice and patients will see Community Physiotherapists and Psychological Therapists. Tier two is being delivered by Pennine MSK Partnership where all patients are assessed by a Pain Specialist clinician and a self-help care plan will be developed in partnership with each patient. The team in tier two comprises Pain Specialist Physiotherapists, Pain Specialist Nurses, Psychological Therapists and a GP with a special interest in pain. This team is integrated with the community rheumatology service and the community orthopedic service within Pennine MSK Partnership. Similarly to the Nottingham model, patients with persistent pain receive their care in either tier one or tier two in the community, but those with the most complex needs receive additional care from tier three, where they will be assessed by a Clinical Psychologist, Liaison Psychiatrist, Pain Consultant and Pain Specialist Nurse. The new three tier service will help patients develop strategies for coping with their pain. Interventions on offer include one to one appointments and group work which addresses the physical, social and psychological effects of pain to give patients the best outcomes. Page 26 of 33
27 Case Study 5 - Kent Community Health NHS Trust Community Chronic Pain Service In 2006 an MSK Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service (ICATS) was developed by Kent Community NHS Trust which includes an ICATS for people suffering from chronic pain. The service operates a Single Point of Access model for all chronic pain referrals in the area. All new referrals into the service are paper triaged by either senior community clinicians or hospital anesthetists on a rota basis. The service supports patients to achieve long term selfmanagement and reduce dependence on healthcare systems; and supports referrers with help and advice through / telephone support. The Service provides a moderate, long term, self-management approach and receives new referrals each month (commissioned for 500). Of those referrals approximately 60% will remain within the community service and the remaining 40% will be directed to the acute service. The service discharges similar number of patients per month as it receives in referrals. Discharge does not mean that a patient is cured of chronic pain, but that they are able to self-manage their condition effectively. It operates a 12 month open door policy for patients who have been discharged 82% patients sustain discharge, 9% directly refer back into service and 9% referred via GP after 12 month period. The community service has helped to reduce duplicate referrals and provide GPs with clear pathway for referring patients. Work with pharmacy services has reduced the analgesic prescribing budget The common themes from these case studies are: Support for GPs to Primary Care to treat patients in the community and to help them manage their own care. Community access points that involve multi-disciplinary teams that assess patients and adopt a cohesive approach to discharge or handover to other parts of the health sector. Outcomes that are focused on a sustained reduction of activity into secondary care. Other potential future models (but no case studies available): I. CCG works in collaboration with one or more GP Networks. Groups of GPs combine with nurses, other community health services, hospital specialists and perhaps mental health and social care to create integrated out-of-hospital care through a Multispecialty Community Provider, to develop their own Chronic Pain CATS. II. CCG works in collaboration with a secondary care provider which becomes an Accountable Care Organisation/Partnership to which the CCG budget would be delegated to, along with the primary care budget for the area. Chronic pain management, and indeed MSK services as a whole would become part of this budget. Page 27 of 33
28 APPENDIX 2 Illustration of Fragmented MSK Pathways in Hillingdon Page 28 of 33
29 APPENDIX 3 MSK OP FA activity per 1000 list size Between April 2013 and May 2015 compared to the seven other NWL CCGs. The graph shows that HCCG appears to have been an outlier since April 2013, and that this gap has increased significantly from June 2014 to May Page 29 of 33
30 APPENDIX 4 Telford & Wrekin and Shropshire CCG Pain Management Referral Activity following implementation of Pain management solutions Pilot Page 30 of 33
31 APPENDIX 5 An illustration of the new Community Chronic Pain service pathway The pathway above ensures that patients with chronic pain have a single point of access to the new Pain service, and a single point of access to the patient s chosen secondary care provider. Patients may be referred for physiotherapy as part of their initial pain treatment and self-management, before being referred by to the Chronic Pain triage service. This service will manage the majority of patients in the community by facilitating individual and group therapies, which include exercise and cognitive behavioural therapy, and discharging patients to their GP with individual management plans. Note that the secondary care Physiotherapy and CBT Pain Management services would be de-commissioned. All chronic pain related Physio and CBT would be delivered in the community. Page 31 of 33
Prime Contractor Model King s Fund Nick Boyle Consultant Surgeon 27 March 2014
Prime Contractor Model King s Fund Nick Boyle Consultant Surgeon 27 March 2014 Current Referral Route options - Information 1. Horizon Health Choices Horizon Musculoskeletal Triage & Treatment Chronic
More informationBusiness Case Template
Business Case Template Project Name Community MSK Service Review SRO (Sponsor) Clinical responsible officers Financials verified by Peter Crutchfield Chair Dr Ruth O Hare Clinical lead Dr Andy Goodstone
More informationIslington Practice Based Mental Health Care: Roll-out plans and progress
Report to: Board of Directors (Public) Paper number: 3.2 Report for: Information Date: 26 th October 2017 Report author/s: Emily van de Pol, Divisional Director, Community Mental Health and Primary Care
More informationBusiness Case Authorisation Cover Sheet
Business Case Authorisation Cover Sheet Section A Business Case Details Business Case Title: Directorate: Division: Sponsor Name Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Medicine and Rehabilitation
More informationPRIMARY CARE COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE MEETING
PRIMARY CARE COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE MEETING Date of meeting Title of report 20 th June 2017 Agenda item number Unscheduled Primary Care Services for the Fylde Coast 7 Paper Presented by: Alison Kerfoot,
More informationIntegrated Urgent Care Procurement in North West London
Integrated Urgent Care Procurement in North West London 1. Executive summary North West London currently have two 111 and out of hours providers (across multiple contracts). The current contracts cease
More informationVanguard Programme: Acute Care Collaboration Value Proposition
Vanguard Programme: Acute Care Collaboration Value Proposition 2015-16 November 2015 Version: 1 30 November 2015 ACC Vanguard: Moorfields Eye Hospital Value Proposition 1 Contents Section Page Section
More informationBUSINESS CASE FOR LEVEL 2 SPECIALIST NEURO-REHABILITATION BEDS : SLIDE PACK & FINANCIAL MODEL
BUSINESS CASE FOR LEVEL 2 SPECIALIST NEURO-REHABILITATION BEDS : SLIDE PACK & FINANCIAL MODEL V8 June 2015 1 Index Executive summary Slides 3-5 Business Case on a Page Slide 6 Model methodology Index/
More informationUpdate on NHS Central London CCG QIPP schemes
Update on NHS Central London CCG QIPP schemes NHS Central London CCG has identified circa 11m for QIPP during 2013/14. Commissioning Intentions approved by the governing body included transformational
More informationNHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting Financial Position as at 31 st July C Hickson, Head of Management Accounts
NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting Financial Position as at 31 st July 2013 9.4 Date of the meeting 18/09/2013 Author Sponsoring GB member Purpose of report Recommendation Resource
More informationContract Award Recommendation for NCL Direct Access Diagnostics Service Tim Deeprose/Leo Minnion
Appendix 5.4 MEETING: Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting DATE: Wednesday, 26 March 2014 TITLE: LEAD DIRECTOR/ MANAGER: CLINICAL LEADS AUTHORS: CONTACT DETAILS: Contract Award
More informationGOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 27 September 2017 Agenda Item 5.2
GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 27 September 2017 Paper Title Report Author Neil Evans Turnaround Director Referral Management s Contributors John Griffiths Date report submitted 20 September 2017 Dean
More informationNHS DORSET CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30TH NOVEMBER C Hickson, Head of Management Accounts
NHS DORSET CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30TH NOVEMBER 2013 Date of the meeting 15/01/2014 Author Sponsoring GB member Purpose of report Recommendation Resource
More informationInpatient and Community Mental Health Patient Surveys Report written by:
2.2 Report to: Board of Directors Date of Meeting: 30 September 2014 Section: Patient Experience and Quality Report title: Inpatient and Community Mental Health Patient Surveys Report written by: Jane
More informationYorkshire and Humber Integrated Urgent Care: Service Development and Procurement
Yorkshire and Humber Integrated Urgent Care: Service Development and Procurement NHS Hull Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting 23 rd March 2018 1. Purpose Integrated Urgent Care (IUC) is
More informationAppendix 1: Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group Risk Register and Board Assurance Framework - 9th April 2013
Appendix 1: Croydon Clinical Register and Board Assurance Framework - 9th April 2013 Principal to Delivery Key Assurance on we have in in our are 1. To achieve financial sustainability in three years (2013-2014
More informationReport to Governing Body 19 September 2018
Report to Governing Body 19 September 2018 Report Title Author(s) Governing Body/Clinical Lead(s) Management Lead(s) CCG Programme Purpose of Report Summary NHS Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG)
More informationNHS GRAMPIAN. Local Delivery Plan - Section 2 Elective Care
NHS GRAMPIAN Local Delivery Plan - Section 2 Elective Care Board Meeting 01/12/2016 Open Session Item 7 1. Actions Recommended The NHS Board is asked to: Consider the context in which planning for future
More informationPsychological Therapies for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in People with Longterm Physical Health Conditions or with Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Psychological Therapies for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in People with Longterm Physical Health Conditions or with Medically Unexplained Symptoms Guide for setting up IAPT-LTC services 1. Aims The
More informationAnnual Complaints Report 2014/15
Annual Complaints Report 2014/15 1.0 Introduction This report provides information in regard to complaints and concerns received by The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust between 01/04/2014 and 31/03/2015.
More informationTransforming musculoskeletal (MSK) services
Transforming musculoskeletal (MSK) services Dr Tom Aslan Hampstead Group Practice GP and Camden CCG MSK clinical lead Working with the people of Camden to achieve the best health for all Problems with
More informationJennifer Riley, Senior Commissioning Manager. Barry Silvert, Clinical Director Commissioning
NHS BOLTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Public Board Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO: 7 Date of Meeting: 24 th June TITLE OF REPORT: AUTHOR: PRESENTED BY: PURPOSE OF PAPER: (Linking to Strategic Objectives) Pain
More informationMusculoskeletal Triage Service
Musculoskeletal Triage Service Frequently Asked Questions Milton Keynes Clinical Commissioning Group (MK CCG) has published its model for musculoskeletal (MSK) care under the title Vision for MSK. The
More informationAvon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust. Extract from NHS STANDARD MULTILATERAL MENTAL HEALTH AND LEARNING DISABILITY SERVICES CONTRACT
SCHEDULE 4 QUALITY PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE SCHEMES 2011/12 Schedule 4 Part 1: Nationally Mandated Incentive Schemes Schedule 4 Part 2: National Incentive Framework for Commissioning for Quality and Innovation
More informationIntegration learning to support responding to the Parliamentary Review of Health and Social Care in Wales and the delivery of new models of care
Integration learning to support responding to the Parliamentary Review of Health and Social Care in Wales and the delivery of new models of care WelshConfed18 Integration learning to support responding
More informationSeven Day Services Clinical Standards September 2017
Seven Day Services Clinical Standards September 2017 11 September 2017 Gateway reference: 06408 Patient Experience 1. Patients, and where appropriate families and carers, must be actively involved in shared
More informationEvaluation of NHS111 pilot sites. Second Interim Report
Evaluation of NHS111 pilot sites Second Interim Report Janette Turner Claire Ginn Emma Knowles Alicia O Cathain Craig Irwin Lindsey Blank Joanne Coster October 2011 This is an independent report commissioned
More informationDelivering the Five Year Forward View. through Business Intelligence
Delivering the Five Year Forward View through Business Intelligence Introduction The market for analytics has matured significantly in the past five years and, although the health sector in the UK has
More informationCASE STUDY: THE ADULT MENTAL HEALTH (AMH) MODEL-REDESIGN OF INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR WORKING AGE ADULTS WITH SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS.
CASE STUDY: THE ADULT MENTAL HEALTH (AMH) MODEL-REDESIGN OF INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR WORKING AGE ADULTS WITH SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS. Summary The Adult Mental Health (AMH) model is a new initiative which
More informationAny Qualified Provider: your questions answered
Any Qualified Provider: your questions answered September 8, 2011 These answers cover a range of questions about the detail of Any Qualified Provider on integrated care, competition and procurement, liability
More informationMental Health URGENT CARE AND ASSESSMENT Business Case. CCG Summary paper
1. Purpose of this paper Mental Health URGENT CARE AND ASSESSMENT Business Case. CCG Summary paper This paper sets out the rationale for investment in new more effective urgent care pathways for people
More informationDRAFT BUSINESS PLAN AND CORPORATE OBJECTIVES 2017/8
DRAFT BUSINESS PLAN AND CORPORATE OBJECTIVES 2017/8 West London Clinical Commissioning Group This document sets out a clear set of plans and priorities for 2017/18 reflecting West London CCGs ambition
More informationLearning from Deaths - Mortality Report
Learning from Deaths - Mortality Report NHS Improvement and the National Quality Board have requested all NHS Trusts to publish a review of mortality by. This is our Trust report. 1. Background In line
More information5. Does this paper provide evidence of assurance against the Governing Body Assurance Framework?
Item Number: 6.3 Governing Body Meeting: 4 February 2016 Report Sponsor Anthony Fitzgerald Director of Strategy and Delivery Report Author Anthony Fitzgerald Director of Strategy and Delivery 1. Title
More informationCOMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME Standard operating procedure April 2018 1. Introduction The Commissioning Support Programme (CSP) at NICE supports the
More informationNHS Somerset CCG OFFICIAL. Overview of site and work
NHS Somerset CCG Overview of site and work NHS Somerset CCG comprises 400 GPs (310 whole time equivalents) based in 72 practices and has responsibility for commissioning services for a dispersed rural
More informationNHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack
NHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack This pack is designed to help you develop your local NHS 111 clinical governance framework and explain how it fits in to the wider context. It takes you through
More informationDELIVERING THE LEFT SHIFT IN ACUTE ACTIVITY THE COMMUNITY MODEL
DELIVERING THE LEFT SHIFT IN ACUTE ACTIVITY THE COMMUNITY MODEL 1. Introduction The Strategic Outline Case (SOC) and subsequent developing Outline Business Case (OBC) for the reconfiguration of acute hospital
More informationDeveloping Plans for the Better Care Fund
Annex to the NHS England Planning Guidance Developing Plans for the Better Care Fund (formerly the Integration Transformation Fund) What is the Better Care Fund? 1. The Better Care Fund (previously referred
More informationUtilisation Management
Utilisation Management The Utilisation Management team has developed a reputation over a number of years as an authentic and clinically credible support team assisting providers and commissioners in generating
More informationservice users greater clarity on what to expect from services
briefing November 2011 Issue 227 Payment by Results in mental health A challenging journey worth taking Key points Commissioners and providers support the introduction of Payment by Results for adult mental
More informationImperial College Health Partners - at a glance
Imperial College Health Partners - at a glance Imperial College Health Partners - at a glance Our vision and purpose This document is intended to provide an introduction to Imperial College Health Partners
More informationLooked After Children Annual Report
Looked After Children Annual Report Reporting period April 2016 March 2017 Authors Maxine Lomax - Designated Nurse for Child Protection & Looked After Children Dr. Bin Hooi Low - Designated Doctor for
More informationNHS Portsmouth CCG 2013/14 Contract Agreements Summary. Michelle Spandley Deputy Chief Finance Officer May Improving health services
NHS Portsmouth CCG 2013/14 Contract Agreements Summary Michelle Spandley Deputy Chief Finance Officer May 2013 Contents Contracts Summary Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust Solent NHS Trust South Central Ambulance
More informationIntegrating care: contracting for accountable models NHS England
New care models Integrating care: contracting for accountable models NHS England Accountable Care Organisation (ACO) Contract package - supporting document Our values: clinical engagement, patient involvement,
More informationIn year 1 (15/16) these outcomes will be measured as outlined below and baselines established from robust data for each indicator.
7. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) (s These KPIs have been selected to demonstrate that care planning in Hillingdon improves patient experience of care, patient s quality of life and improves health
More informationThe PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes
The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes This Guide has been produced by the NHS Modernisation Agency. For further information on the Agency or the 10 High Impact Changes please visit www.modern.nhs.uk
More informationDRAFT. Rehabilitation and Enablement Services Redesign
DRAFT Rehabilitation and Enablement Services Redesign Services Vision Statement Inverclyde CHP is committed to deliver Adult rehabilitation services that are easily accessible, individually tailored to
More informationImproving General Practice for the People of West Cheshire
Improving General Practice for the People of West Cheshire Huw Charles-Jones (GP Chair, West Cheshire Clinical Commissioning Group) INTRODUCTION There is a growing consensus that the current model of general
More informationGOVERNING BODY REPORT
GOVERNING BODY REPORT 1. Date of Governing Body Meeting: 2. Title of Report: Finance, Performance and Commissioning Committee Report 3. Key Messages: At the end of March 2017 the clinical commissioning
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW LATENT TUBERCULOSIS (TB) SCREENING SERVICE TO BE FUNDED BY NHSE/PHE
PROPOSAL FOR NEW LATENT TUBERCULOSIS (TB) SCREENING SERVICE TO BE FUNDED BY NHSE/PHE PROJECT TITLE NHSE/PHE TB Funding Request Proposal for LTBI Testing PROPOSED BY Christine Falzon (Project Manager) EMAIL
More informationTitle: Climate-HIV Case Study. Author: Keith Roberts
Title: Climate-HIV Case Study Author: Keith Roberts The Project CareSolutions Climate HIV is a specialised electronic patient record (EPR) system for HIV medicine. Designed by clinicians for clinicians
More information2. The mental health workforce
2. The mental health workforce Psychiatry Data provided by NHS Digital demonstrates that in September 2016 there were 8,819 psychiatrists (total number across all grades). This is 6.3% more psychiatrists
More information62 days from referral with urgent suspected cancer to initiation of treatment
Appendix-2012-87 Borders NHS Board PATIENT ACCESS POLICY Aim In preparation for the introduction of the Patients Rights (Scotland) Act 2011, NHS Borders has produced a Patient Access Policy governing the
More informationTEES, ESK & WEAR VALLEYS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST: DEVELOPING A MODEL LINE FOR RECOVERY- FOCUSED CARE
TEES, ESK & WEAR VALLEYS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST: DEVELOPING A MODEL LINE FOR RECOVERY- FOCUSED CARE Summary Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) adapted the model line concept from industry
More informationThe Welsh NHS Confederation s response to the inquiry into cross-border health arrangements between England and Wales.
Welsh Affairs Committee. Purpose: The Welsh NHS Confederation s response to the inquiry into cross-border health arrangements between England and Wales. Contact: Nesta Lloyd Jones, Policy and Public Affairs
More informationDelivering the Five Year Forward View Personalised Health and Care 2020
Paper Ref: NIB 0607-006 Delivering the Five Year Forward View Personalised Health and Care 2020 INTRODUCTION The Five Year Forward View set out a clear direction for the NHS showing why change is needed
More informationOutcome Based Commissioning in Richmond. March 2015
Outcome Based Commissioning in Richmond March 2015 Contents 1. What is Outcome Based Commissioning? 2. Case for Change for Community Services in Richmond 3. Findings from Outcomes that Matter and Detailed
More informationChronic Pain Management Team
Chronic Pain Management Service Welcome to the chronic pain service at Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust. This service is provided in partnership with Bridgewater Community Healthcare
More informationBest Practice Tariff: Early Inflammatory Arthritis
Best Practice Tariff: Early Inflammatory Arthritis Dear colleague, The Payment by Results team at the Department of Health has recently issued the 2013-14 road test package for comment. The purpose of
More informationA must have for any GP surgery. It is like having our own Social Worker, CAB, Mental Health Worker all rolled into one who will chase up patients on
A must have for any GP surgery. It is like having our own Social Worker, CAB, Mental Health Worker all rolled into one who will chase up patients on the phone and even go out to their houses if needed
More informationReview of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015
Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board Audit year: 2014-15 Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015 Status of report This document has been prepared as part
More informationTOPIC 9 - THE SPECIALIST PALLIATIVE CARE TEAM (MDT)
TOPIC 9 - THE SPECIALIST PALLIATIVE CARE TEAM (MDT) Introduction The National Institute for Clinical Excellence has developed Guidance on Supportive and Palliative Care for patients with cancer. The standards
More informationNHS North West London
NHS North West London Shaping a Healthier Future Pre-Consultation Business Case Volume 6 Appendices A1 & A2 Edition: 1 20 June 2012 Page 1 of 29 APPENDIX A1 Programme Governance A.1.1 Key governance principles
More informationYou said We did. Care Closer to home Acute and Community Care services. Commissioning Intentions Engagement for 2017/18
Commissioning Intentions Engagement for 2017/18 You said We did Care Closer to home Acute and Community Care services Top three priorities were: Shifting hospital services into the community Community
More informationThe Integrated Support and Assurance Process (ISAP): guidance on assuring novel and complex contracts
The Integrated Support and Assurance Process (ISAP): guidance on assuring novel and complex contracts Part A: Introduction Published by NHS England and NHS Improvement August 2017 First published: Friday
More informationNHS WOLVERHAMPTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP CONSTITUTION
NHS WOLVERHAMPTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP CONSTITUTION Version: [78] NHS England Effective Date: 1 December 2015 April 2017 CONTENTS Part Description Page Foreword 1 1 Introduction and Commencement
More informationPain Management HRGs
The NHS Information Centre is England s central, authoritative source of health and social care information The Casemix Service designs and refines classifications that are used by the NHS in England to
More informationNHS Bradford Districts CCG Commissioning Intentions 2016/17
NHS Bradford Districts CCG Commissioning Intentions 2016/17 Introduction This document sets out the high level commissioning intentions of NHS Bradford Districts Clinical Commissioning Group (BDCCG) for
More informationWOLVERHAMPTON CCG. Governing Body Meeting 8 April 2014
WOLVERHAMPTON CCG Governing Body Meeting ` Agenda item:12 TITLE OF REPORT: REPORT PRESENTED BY: Commissioning Committee Summary Dr Kamran Ahmed Title of Report: Update from the Commissioning Committee
More informationStratified care, psychological approaches and patient outcomes. Dr Jonathan Hill NIHR Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy Keele University UK
Stratified care, psychological approaches and patient outcomes Dr Jonathan Hill NIHR Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy Keele University UK Has risk stratification worked? + Right person, right place, right
More informationCouncil of Members. 20 January 2016
Council of Members 20 January 2016 Feedback on election process: Council of Members Chair and Deputy Chair Malcolm Hines, Chief Financial Officer Minutes of last meeting: 14 October 2015 Dr. Richard Proctor,
More informationNHS CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES SCHEDULE 2 - THE SERVICES
: Service Specification SCHEDULE 2 - THE SERVICES SERVICE SPECIFICATION Service Commissioner Lead Provider Lead Musculoskeletal Clinical Assessment Service Physiotherapy Service NHS Knowsley 5BP NHS Foundation
More informationPlanned Care Strategy
Planned Care Strategy 2013-2016 Executive Summary Page 1 of 16 To deliver high quality and effective services, safely, in the right setting with the right professional. Vision Values Strategic Planned
More informationOffering Advice & Guidance: Supplementary Guidance for CQUIN Indicator 6. August 2017
Offering Advice & Guidance: Supplementary Guidance for CQUIN Indicator 6 August 2017 This information can be made available in alternative formats, such as easy read or large print, and may be available
More informationClinical Pharmacists in General Practice March 2018
Clinical Pharmacists in General Practice March 2018 1. Background Following a successful national pilot programme, the General Practice Forward View committed over 100million to support an extra 1,500
More informationOUTLINE PROPOSAL BUSINESS CASE
OUTLINE PROPOSAL BUSINESS CASE Name of proposer: Dr. David Keith Murray, General Practitioner, Leeds Student Medical Practice, 4, Blenheim Court, Blenheim Walk, LEEDS LS2 9AE Date: 20 Aug 2014 Title of
More informationMilton Keynes CCG Strategic Plan
Milton Keynes CCG Strategic Plan 2012-2015 Introduction Milton Keynes CCG is responsible for planning the delivery of health care for its population and this document sets out our goals over the next three
More informationAuthor: Kelvin Grabham, Associate Director of Performance & Information
Trust Policy Title: Access Policy Author: Kelvin Grabham, Associate Director of Performance & Information Document Lead: Kelvin Grabham, Associate Director of Performance & Information Accepted by: RTT
More informationQUALITY STRATEGY
NHS Nene and NHS Corby Clinical Commissioning Groups QUALITY STRATEGY 2017-2021 Approved: By the Joint Quality Committee on 11 April 2017 Ratified: By the NHS Corby Clinical Commissioning Group on 25 April
More informationMethods: Commissioning through Evaluation
Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations and Information Specialised Commissioning Nursing Trans. & Corp. Ops. Commissioning Strategy
More informationAligning the Publication of Performance Data: Outcome of Consultation
Aligning the Publication of Performance Data: Outcome of Consultation NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Commissioning Operations Patients and Information Nursing Trans. & Corp. Ops.
More informationImproving Mental Health Services in Bath & North East Somerset
Improving Mental Health Services in Bath & North East Somerset Andy Sylvester Executive Director of Operations Welcome & Introductions Housekeeping Format of the day Presentations Questions and answers
More information16 May Elizabeth James Director of Clinical Commissioning, Barnet CCG
Barnet Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee 16 May 2016 Title North West London, Barnet & Brent Wheelchairs Service Redesign Report of Elizabeth James Director of Clinical Commissioning, Barnet CCG Wards
More informationStrategic Risk Report 4 July 2016
Strategic Report 4 July 20 Haringey CCG Register Introduction The Strategic Report (historically known as the Board Assurance Framework) evidences Haringey Clinical Group s control over the delivery of
More informationPATIENT RIGHTS ACT (SCOTLAND) 2011 ACCESS POLICY FOR TREATMENT TIME GUARANTEE
NHS Board Meeting Tuesday 16 October 2012 Chief Operating Officer (Acute Services Division) Board Paper No. 12/45 PATIENT RIGHTS ACT (SCOTLAND) 2011 ACCESS POLICY FOR TREATMENT TIME GUARANTEE Recommendation:
More information: Geraint Davies, Director of Commercial Services
Report to : Trust Board of Directors Date of Report: 15/05/2015 Agenda Item: 0/15 Date of Meeting : 28 May 2015 Subject Report from Purpose : Report on Corporate Risk Register : Geraint Davies, Director
More informationReducing Variation in Primary Care Strategy
Reducing Variation in Primary Care Strategy September 2014 Page 1 of 14 REDUCING VARIATION IN PRIMARY CARE STRATEGY 1. Introduction The Reducing Variation in Primary Care Strategy should be seen as one
More informationManchester Health and Care Commissioning Board. A partnership between Manchester. City Council and NHS Manchester Clinical Commissioning Group
Manchester Health and Care Commissioning Board A partnership between Manchester City Council and NHS Manchester Clinical Commissioning Group Agenda Item: Report Title: Date: Strategic Commissioning Prepared
More informationPhysiotherapy outpatient services survey 2012
14 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4ED Tel +44 (0)20 7306 6666 Web www.csp.org.uk Physiotherapy outpatient services survey 2012 reference PD103 issuing function Practice and Development date of issue March 2013
More informationVision 3. The Strategy 6. Contracts 12. Governance and Reporting 12. Conclusion 14. BCCG 2020 Strategy 15
Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Quality Strategy 2014-2016 Contents SECTION 1: Vision 3 1.1 Vision for Quality 3 1.2 What is Quality? 3 1.3 The NHS Outcomes Framework 3 1.4 Other National Drivers
More informationEngland. Questions and Answers. Draft Integrated Care Provider (ICP) Contract - consultation package
England Questions and Answers Draft Integrated Care Provider (ICP) Contract - consultation package August 2018 Questions and Answers Draft Integrated Care Provider (ICP) Contract - consultation package
More informationDraft Commissioning Intentions
The future for Luton s primary care services Draft Commissioning Intentions 2013-14 The NHS will have less money to spend over the next three years. Overall, it has to make 20 billion of efficiency savings
More informationMental Health Social Work: Community Support. Summary
Adults and Safeguarding Commitee 8 th June 2015 Title Mental Health Social Work: Community Support Report of Dawn Wakeling Adults and Health Commissioning Director Wards All Status Public Enclosures Appendix
More informationA meeting of NHS Bromley CCG Governing Body 25 May 2017
South East London Sector A meeting of NHS Bromley CCG Governing Body 25 May 2017 ENCLOSURE 4 SOUTH EAST LONDON 111 AND GP OUT OF HOURS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SUMMARY: The NHS England Commissioning
More informationWarrington Children and Young People s Mental Health and Wellbeing Local Transformation Plan
Warrington Children and Young People s Mental Health and Wellbeing Local Transformation Plan 2015-2020 1 Introduction 1.1 Welcome to the update on Warrington s Local Transformation Plan for Children and
More informationPapers for the. West Kent Primary Care Commissioning Committee (Improving Access) Tuesday 21 st August at 4 4:30 pm
Papers for the West Kent Primary Care Commissioning Committee (Improving Access) on Tuesday 21 st August at 4 4:30 pm at Hadlow Suite, Hadlow Manor Hotel Hadlow, TN11 0JH 1 of 23 Primary Care Commissioning
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy. This policy applies Trust wide
Learning from Deaths Policy This policy applies Trust wide Document control page Name of policy Learning from Deaths Policy Names of linked Learning from Deaths Procedure procedures Accountable Medical
More informationNHS Wales Delivery Framework 2011/12 1
1. Introduction NHS Wales Delivery Framework for 2011/12 NHS Wales has made significant improvements in targeted performance areas over recent years. This must continue and be associated with a greater
More informationEAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST REPORT TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS DATE: 7 AUGUST 2015 SUBJECT: REPORT FROM: PURPOSE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE S REPORT CHIEF EXECUTIVE Decision CONTEXT / REVIEW HISTORY
More information