STATE OF ALASKA RFP NUMBER 2514H002 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

Transcription

1 RETURN THIS AMENDMENT TO THE ISSUING OFFICE AT: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box (3132 Channel Drive, Room 310) Juneau, Alaska Error! Switch argument not specified. THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE AMENDMENT ISSUED: May 13, 2014 RFP TITLE: Rural Airport Badging System RFP OPENING DATE AND TIME: June 6, 2014 at 2:00 PM This amendment serves to extend the proposal due date to June 6, 2014 at 2:00 PM Alaska Time. This amendment also serves to provide answers to questions posed during the pre-proposal conference held on May 1, This amendment also serves to amend the RFP document and Attachment 9 Cost Proposal. Amended versions of these documents are posted with this amendment. Changes to both documents are notated by bold red text and a red line running along the left margin of the page. 1. Question: Please confirm the method of proposal delivery. Proposals must be submitted in hard copy with one original and 3 copies. Hard copies should be accompanied by electronic copies of both the technical and cost proposals in PDF and Excel formats. 2. Question: Are questions allowed outside of the pre-proposal conference? Yes, questions may be sent to the procurement officer via or telephone at any time. Questions via telephone must be confirmed in writing. 3. Question: Please clarify the requirement listed in section 1.05 concerning travel costs. How does this relate to section ? Section 1.05 requires that offerors include travel costs in their price proposals. Section requests that offerors provide a sample travel plan in their technical proposal. The sample travel plan included in the technical proposal should not include cost data. Offerors should include travel cost data in the space provided in the cost proposal template. All travel incurred on this program will be reimbursed at cost. Page 1 of 5

2 4. Question: STATE OF ALASKA RFP NUMBER 2514H002 What is the current badge holder population per airport? Northern Region Central Region Southeast Region Airport Population Airport Population Airport Population BRW 193 ADK 39 PSG 64 OTZ 161 DLG 191 WRG 39 CDV 100 AKN 128 SIT 171 SCC 323 ADQ 236 GST 58 OME 228 BET 261 YAK 69 VDZ 100* * Currently the VDZ location does not have a badging program, however it is estimated the badge holder population will be no more than Question: Is there an intent to standardize the Live Scan software and hardware at all airports? What is the current level of access control at the airports? Please provide an inventory of livescan and cross match version with software and scanner versions. Beyond standardizing at the brand level (crossmatch) there is will not be a standardization of the scanner and specific software version in relation to this contract future replacement of livescan systems through attrition may result in a greater level of standardization. Most airports do not have PACS installed. Those few that do are of a non-standard varied type and shall not be integrated into this project. Future PACS installations will represent the standard PACS and will be integrated into this project. The Southeast Region, Adak, and Valdez airports currently do not have livescan systems. Implementation of a livescan system in these locations is not currently planned however if the State implements a livescan system at these locations it is intended for it to be of a version compatible with RABS integration. Livescan versions at the airports equipped with livescan are as follows: Central Region: All locations except ADK Crossmatch ID 500 software version Northern Region: BRW** ID500 software version AAAE_ _3.9.8_ _041707_0837 OTZ Crossmatch Guardian software version CDV Crossmatch ID 500 software version AAAE_ _3.9.8_ _041707_0837 SCC** Crossmatch ID 500 software version AAAE_ _3.9.8_ _041707_0837 OME Crossmatch ID 500 software version AAAE_ _3.9.8_ _041707_0837 Northern Region Office Crossmatch Guardian software version **BRW and SCC currently have a Crossmatch Guardian system on order to replace the ID Question: Why are the alternate locations not part of the base contract? Inclusion on the alternate location list as well as execution of any alternate locations is at the sole discretion of the State. 7. Question: Is Ted Stevens International Airport a possible location for this contract? No Page 2 of 5

3 8. Question: How stringent are the software and hardware requirements detailed in section 5.03? Do these requirements change if the system is hosted or non-hosted? The DOT&PF IT software standards are included as Attachment #5 of the RFP. If a DOT&PF-Hosted system is provided, it must meet the DOT&PF IT standards shown in this attachment, or the proposal will be found to be non-responsive. If a Vendor-Hosted system is proposed the vendor must state how they will support any part of the system proposed that does not meet the DOT&PF IT software standards in Attachment #5, as DOT&PF IT will only support the software, platforms and products shown in Attachment #5. 9. Question: Why is the Fairbanks International Airport (FAI) on the list of alternate locations? Inclusion of FAI as a possible alternate location is at the sole discretion of the state. 10. Question: Please provide additional clarification on which requested items are proposal deliverables and which are contract deliverables. The following list serves to assist offerors in addressing proposal deliverables requested by the RABS RFP. This list is not comprehensive and there may be additional proposal deliverables required by the RFP. Completion of this list does not guarantee a finding of responsiveness. Offerors are responsible for thoroughly reviewing the RFP to ensure that they have met all requirements and have provided all necessary information and deliverables. Line RFP Section Item Description (1) High-level Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (2) Hardware and Software Environment Specifications Including a Consolidated Bill of Materials (Without Cost Data) (3) Proposed System Architecture Diagram (4) Change Control Management/Communication Plan (5) Project Organization Chart Supported Makes and Models of Peripheral Hardware (5) Makes and Models for Peripheral Hardware Items Proposed Service Level Agreement and (1) Recommended Hardware Requirements (1) Telephone or Customer Support Services Detail (2) Change Management Program (3) Data Storage and Archiving Methodologies 11. Question: Will the successful offeror have access to the IRIS test environment for the purpose of testing IRIS interfacing? The IRIS system is still in development and the test environment has not currently been released. It is anticipated that, when released, the test environment will be available to the successful offeror contingent upon to-bedeveloped guidelines for access. Page 3 of 5

4 12. Question: Please clarify Section item 22. Is 24/7 availability required? Section item 22 is hereby amended to read: RABS shall have 99.9% availability during normal working hours, 6 AM to 6 PM Alaska Time. RABS shall be available outside normal working hours, however, unscheduled downtime occurring outside normal working hours will not count against the availability requirement. Any required updates or maintenance shall be scheduled, in coordination with the DOT&PF Project Manager, to occur during non-active time periods. Where a single point of failure could disrupt operations (e.g., component failure like a badge printer) the successful offeror shall have a means to not only work around the disruption (regional office to print badges for example) but shall also have the means for rapid troubleshooting and during the vendor supported life of the system, rapid repair or replacement. Failures related to local internet disruptions shall not be counted against the availability requirement. 13. Question: Please clarify Section item 1. Section item 1 is hereby amended to read: The Successful Offeror will be required to provide a toll free phone number and contact available for technical support at a minimum during the hours of 6 AM to 6 PM AKST 7 days a week. 14. Question: Please clarify Section item 5(g). Is lamination intended to be dual sided? Will use of a mag stripe be required? Yes, Dual sided. Mag stripe capability is required, see RFP page 25 paragraph Question: Please clarify section item 5. What is meant by "state approved equivalent"? Model and item numbers listed are for illustrative purposes. They are based on the operational needs of the various airport locations. Offers may propose hardware items other than those listed provided justification and explanation to support the selection of the alternatives shall be submitted as well. Alternate hardware items will be evaluated based on suitability for the operating environment. 16. Question: Please clarify if the "Peripheral Integration -vendor" listed in Section item 5 is another entity outside of the offeror. This is a typo. Item 5 is titled "Peripheral Integration" the vendor being referred to is the successful offeror. Section item 5 is amended to read: Peripheral Integration - The Successful Offeror shall provide peripheral hardware simultaneously: Page 4 of 5

5 17. Question: STATE OF ALASKA RFP NUMBER 2514H002 Please clarify how RABS should interface with CHRC. CHRCs are submitted and retrieved through established channels including the livescan system, the DAC, TSA, and FBI. Offerors are responsible for working with those external parties to understand how CHRC processing is accomplished. 18. Question: What is the purpose of having the infrastructure upgrades priced as Time and Materials? The IT infrastructure of the rural airports covered by this project is not currently known in detail. For this reason a fixed price contract for infrastructure upgrades is not currently feasible. Offerors must provide T&M rates to be used for any infrastructure upgrades authorized by the project manager. The State reserves the right to perform any necessary upgrades itself at the sole discretion of the State. 19. Question: Please clarify Attachment 9 - Cost Proposal. Attachment 9 - Cost Proposal is the required format for the offerors Cost Proposal. The Excel file consists of two tabs, Instructions and Cost Proposal. Offerors should return the completed Cost Proposal with their electronic submissions in Excel format. 20. Question: Section 1.08 seems to indicate that no questions will be accepted after 10 days prior to the proposal due date, is this correct? Section 1.08 Required Review relates to questions regarding defects, questionable material, or objectionable material in the RFP. Comments concerning these issues must be received at least ten days prior to proposal opening. A protest based on any omission, error, or the content of the solicitation will be disallowed if these faults have not been brought to the attention of the procurement officer, in writing, at least ten days before the time set for proposal opening. Questions and clarifications of a general nature not related to a deficiency of the RFP will be accepted at any time per section In order for your bid to be considered responsive this amendment, in addition to your original proposal, must be received by the issuing office of the Division of Transportation and Public Facilities prior to the proposal due date. Neil Steininger Procurement Specialist III PHONE: (907) FAX: (907) NAME OF COMPANY SIGNATURE DATE Page 5 of 5