11:30. n Planning Agency. kimley-horn.com
|
|
- Alberta Jones
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CRTPA Board Retreat Summary for the Connections 2040 Regional Mobility Plan CRTPA Board Retreat Monday, April 14, :30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Prepared by: Kimley-Horn 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102 Tallahassee, Florida Prepared for: Capital Region Transportation n Planning Agency 408 N. Adams Street, 4 th Floor Tallahassee, Florida kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
2 Page 2 Table of Contents CRTPA Board Retreat Summary for the Connections 2040 Regional Mobility Plan... 1 CRTPA Board Retreat... 1 Monday, April 14, :30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m Executive Summary... 4 Board Retreat Objective and Agenda... 5 Objective... 5 Agenda... 5 Project Team Introductions... 6 Communications Protocol... 8 Internal Correspondence... 8 External Communication... 9 Project Background Map-21 Requirements Process Flow Chart Work Plan Goal Setting Discussion Regional Mobility Plan Goals Access Connectivity Coordination Economic Development Financial Feasibility Land Use Multimodalism m Natural Resource Protection/Conservation Public Participation Safety and Public Health Security Public Involvement Approach kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
3 Page 3 Public involvement priorities Public involvement techniques County Transportation Strategies Elements Appendix: Board Retreat Presentation kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
4 Page 4 Executive Summary Following the regular CRTPA Board Meeting, the CRTPAA Board engaged in a facilitated workshop for Connections 2040, the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan. This workshop provided an overview of the project and the planning process for the Regional Mobilityy Plan. The Board Members participated in a facilitated goal-setting discussion and identified challenges and opportunities for the plan. The etreat also included a discussion of the County Transportation Strategies and how these county-specific strategies relate to the overall Regional Mobility Plan. kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
5 Page 5 Board Retreat Objective and Agenda OBJECTIVE The objective of the CRTPA Connections 2040 Board Retreat was to: Introduce the project team and provide an overview of the planning process, roles, and responsibilities. Conduct regional goal-setting exercise and identify challenges and opportunities for the plan development. AGENDA To accomplish the objective of the CRTPA Connections 2040 Board Retreat, the agenda for the Retreat was designed as follows: Project Team Introductions o Communicationn Protocol Project Background o MAP-21 Requirements o Process Flow Chart o Work Plan Goal Setting Discussion Public Involvement Approach o Public Participation Plan County Transportationn Strategies o Philosophy o Major Input Opportunities o Deliverables kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
6 Page 6 Project Team Introductions Kimley-Horn was selected to be the lead consultant for thee CRTPA 2040 Regional Mobility Plan. The project consultant leadership team was introduced to the CRTPA Board. Allison Fluitt, the consultant Project Manager, was not in attendance due to maternity leave, but the Deputy Project Manager, Stephen Stansbery facilitated the Board Retreat and noted that the primary project contacts are: Allison Fluitt (Project Manager) Allison.Fluitt@kimley-horn.com Phone: (919) Stephen Stansbery (Deputy Project Manager) Stephen.Stansbery@kimley-horn.com Phone: (704) Richard Barr (Project Director) Richard.Barr@kimley-horn.com Phone: (850) Jon Sewell (Secondary Contact) Jon.Sewell@kimley-horn.comm Phone: (850) Artie White Artie.White@kimley-horn.com Phone: (850) The Project Manager on behalf of the CRTPA is: Jack Kostrzewa John..Kostrzewa@talgov.com Phone: (850) The Executive Director of the CRTPA is: Harry Reed Harry.Reed@talgov.com Phone: (850) kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
7 Page 7 The Board Retreatt meeting packet included the following organization chart to show how the consultant leadership team will be supported by an experienced group of task leaders. kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
8 Page 8 COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL To promote the consistent communications for throughoutt the development of the Regional Mobility Plan, the following communications protocol was providedd in the Board Retreat meeting packet. Internal Correspondence The success of this plan will depend on good communication between the Consultant and CRTPA. The following channels are envisioned for communicatingg project intent, status, and recommendations throughout the life of the project: To make correspondence easier to organize, internal s typically will have a standard subject line prefix (e.g. RMP 2040 ) followed details on the content of the . Additional team members will be CC d when necessary to ensure consistent communication. Progress Reports Kimley-Horn will prepare a progress report each month that details recent activities, upcoming milestones, and current issues to be resolved. CRTPA Board Meetings / Board Retreats A total of three meetings/retreats with the CRTPA Board will ensure targeted communication at key milestones in the planning process. Website While geared toward an external audience, the project website will include information critical to internal corresponden ce such as details on the process and schedule. The website also will serve as a clearinghouse for outreach methods and summaries, project data, and deliverables. kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
9 Page 9 External Communication Branding To ensure the planning process is recognizable, has a positive image, and expressess the themes supported by stakeholders, a branding program will be initiated. The branding will be simple, Thematic, iconic and aesthetically appealing. The brand will include a project moniker, color scheme, and set of design templates (headers/footers, mapping title blocks, fonts, etc.). The brand will be finalized early in the process and applied to all materials generated by the project team. Visibility of Outreach The planning process, development of recommendations, and prioritization of projects must occur in a transparent and engaging way. The visibility of outreach will be an important consideration and be manifested through a variety of active and passive activities outlined in the Public Participation Plan. Thesee activities include: Public workshops/work sessions Stakeholder and small group interviews Transit stakeholder interviews Newsletters / blasts Project website Social media Questionnaires/surveyss (general questionnaire, phone survey,, Digital Dotmocracy, GIS- Based Public Participation Tool) Public/community events Coordinated Committees To ensure broad representation n and participation, a series of meetings will be held with groups identified by CRTPA. These groups include the CMAC (up to 8 meetings), TAC (up to 8 meetings), Stakeholders Committee (up to 4 meetings), and Disadvantagedd Coordinating Board (up to 4 meetings). Deliverables The summary of final plans requirements will be communicated in a series of deliverables. The deliverables will be vetted by CRTPA staff and distributed to the public via the project website. Deliverables will include: Technical Documentation A series of technical appendices or a technical memoranda that include relevant model documentation and other required supporting information for certification Summary Report A document that conveys the results ( rather than how the resultss were derived) through a concise document that focuses on graphics, maps, and tables Executive Summary A brochure or poster that memorializes the outcomes of the process and serves as a quick reference to the plan Project Inventory A compilation of the project sheets (i.e. project at glance ) created to summarize projects in the first 10 years of the Cost Feasible Plan kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
10 Page 10 Project Background The presentation for the CRTPA Board Retreat began with general background information about the project. The primary focus of this part of the presentation was on differences between the 2035 Regional Mobility Plan and the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan. The changes are related to: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) The Planning Process that will be used for the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan The specific work plan for the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan MAP-21 REQUIREMENTS The 2035 Regional Mobility Plan was developed in accordance with the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The 2040 Regional Mobility Plan will be developed in accordance with MAP-21, the current surface transportation legislation. The presentation at the Board Retreat included an overview of the MAP-21 Planning Factors, MAP- as shown in the following Process Flow Chart: 21 Performance Goals, and MAP-21 Performance Measures. PROCESS FLOW CHART The presentation included a discussion of the project phases and milestones throughout the project, kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
11 Page 11 WORK PLAN The work plan for the project divides the project into 20 individual taskss that occur between January 2014 and September Consistent with the Process Flow Chart, the work plan reflects the major milestones in the project, including: Connections 2040 RMP Goals Opportunities Plan Needs Plan Cost Feasible Plan Prioritization Process and Measures of Effectiveness Goal Setting Discussion The majority of the Board Retreat was spent on the goal setting discussion REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN GOALS The facilitated goal setting discussion compared the Regional Mobility Plan Goals to MAP-21 Planning Factors. The 2035 Regional Mobility Plan identified the following goals: Access Connectivity Coordination Economic Development Financial Feasibility Land Use Multimodalism Natural Resource Protection/Conservation Public Participation Safety and Public Health Security Because the majority of the 2035 Regional Mobility Plan Goals align with MAP-21 Planning Factors, only minor edits and revisions are needed for the development of Regional Mobility Plan Goals consistent with MAP-21 requirements. The following modifications to the 2035 Regional Mobility Plan Goals were discussed with the CRTPA Board: Access The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors. Connectivity The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors. kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
12 Page 12 Coordination The 2035 Goal does not align with any MAP-21 the CRTPA Public Involvement Process Plan, and the 2040 Planning Factor. Coordination is also inherent in the composition of the CRTPA Board, Regional Mobility Plan Public Involvement Plan. For the 2040 Goals, the project team recommended removing the Coordination Goal. Economic Development The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors. Financial Feasibility The 2035 Goal is loosely consistent with a MAP-21 Planning Factor; however, financial feasibility is inherent in the requirements and process for the Regional Mobility Plan. For this reason, this Goal can be removed. Land Use The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors; however, the CRTPA Board acknowledged thatt the term compact urban form may not be reflective of the nature of the rural counties in the CRTPA area. Multimodalism The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors, however, the CRTPA Board acknowledged the need to address diversity and integration of travel choices in this Goal. Natural Resource Protection/Conservation The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors; however, the CRTPA Board acknowledged thatt the term compact growth may not bee reflective of the nature of the rural counties in the CRTPA area. Public Participation The 2035 Goal does not align with any MAP-21 Process Plan, and the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan Public Involvement Plan. Because public participation is a requirement of the project and reflected in these other documents, it can be removed as a 2040 Regional Mobility Plan Goal. Planning Factor. Public participation is required based on the CRTPA Public Involvement Safety and Public Health The 2035 Goal aligns with MAP-21 Planning Factor related to safety; however, the public health portion of the Goal does not align with any MAP-21 Planning Factor. The CRTPA Board discussed the appropriateness of separating the Goal into a Securityy Goal and a Public Health Goal. Security The 2035 Goal is consistent with Map-21 Planning Factors. kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
13 Page 13 Input from the CRTPA Board Members of the CRTPA Board provided the following input for the Connections 2040 Regional Mobility Plan: The Regional Mobility Plan should address the movement of freight and how the transportation network influences economic development with regards to freight. The use of the term compact urban form in the Regional Mobility Plan Goals may not reflect the desiredd development patterns for the entire CRTPA area, particularly in the rural counties. The term compact growth is relativee for each county in the CRTPA area. For example, compact growth in Wakulla County is not the same as compact growth in Leon County. Wakulla County is reliant on a few highways for the movementt of goods because there is no Interstate access or active rail lines in Wakulla County to move freight. Jefferson, Leon, and Gadsden Counties each have interchanges for Interstate-10 within their respective counties. Public involvement is very important to the planning process. The CRTPA Committees, especially the Citizens Multimodal Advisory Committee, served an important role in the development of the 2035 Regional Mobility Plan and should have a similar role in the development of the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan. Each committee should be able to comment on their part of the Regional Mobility Plan. Rail is important to both Gadsden and Leon Counties. Both Counties are interested in expanding rail infrastructure and capabilities. The 2040 Regional Mobility Plan should reflect the needs of both rural counties and urban areas. This is one of the reasons the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan will include County Transportation Strategies as the basis for the plan. The County Transportation Strategies will be beneficial to the individual counties, but the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan needs to be coordinated at a regional level to avoid fragmentation and to emphasize an overall regional plan. Economic development is a key issue currently supported the Florida Department of Transportation and the Governor s Office. Economic development is a very important aspect of the Regional Mobility Plan. This is true for both urban and rural areas. For example, Wakulla County has an interest in widening Crawfordville Highway from two lanes to four lanes to foster economic development. The CRTPA Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinating Board is involved in flex-routes and wants to extend the routes to rural areas. Mobility and accessibility for certain groups, such as the mobility disadvantaged, is important to connect people to jobs and schools. Geometric improvements should be considered as a means to reduce crashes and improve safety. The Regional Mobility Plan should separate mobility needs of people from freight. Wakulla County is very interested in the mobility needs of people because they have little fright, but plays a significant role in connecting people to the coast. The airport needs to be addressed in the Regional Mobility Plan. Bicycle facilities and pedestrian facilities are oftenn grouped together, but they often servee two different purposes. The Regional Mobility Plan should consider bicycle and pedestrian needs separately. Planned schools should be considered in the Regional Mobility Plan. The movement of fuel trucks from Bainbridge, GAA could pose a security threat. Gadsden County has seen an interest in expansion of the airport with regards to types of aircraft and businesses located at the airport. kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
14 Page 14 Public Involvement Approach The project consultant leadership team presented the public involvement approach to the CRTPA Board. This presentation included: Public involvement priorities Public involvement techniques Upcoming outreach PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PRIORITIES The public involvement priorities for the Regional Mobility Plan are: Quantifiable and measurable involvement Creating a forum for informed decisions Presenting active and passive outreach opportunities Gaining geographically and demographically diverse input Documenting the public involvement well PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT TECHNIQUES Techniques that will be used to involve the public and gainn input include: Project website Facebook MetroQuest Surveys TAC and CMAC meetings CRTPA Board meetings County work sessions Public Workshops County Transportation Strategies The project consultant leadership team presented the concept and purpose of the County Transportation Strategies. These County Transportation Strategies are a feature of the 2040 Regional Mobility Plan that was not included in previous Regional Mobility Plans. These County Transportation Strategies will be structured to integrate with local comprehensive plans and to position local communities for enhances partnership opportunities. ELEMENTS The County Transportation Strategies will include the following elements: County-specific guiding principles County-specific Opportunities Plan Identified Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan projects Project sheets by county for the first 10 years of the Cost Feasible Plan kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
15 Page 15 Next Steps The next steps in the development of the Connections 2040 Regional Mobility Plan are: Finalize and promote the project website, Facebook page, and MetroQuestt outreach Schedule and facilitate meetings with technical staff for each County for the County Transportation Strategies Promote and facilitate public workshops in each county in the CRTPA area kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
16 Page 16 Appendix: Board Retreat Presentation kimley-horn.com 2615 Centennial Boulevard, Suite 102, Tallahassee, FL
17 Board Retreat April 16, 2014
18 Agenda 1. Project Team Introductions 2. Project Background 3. Goal Setting Discussion 4. Public Involvement Approach 5. County Transportation Strategies
19
20 PROJECT BACKGROUND
21 MAP 21 Planning Factors 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiencies 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users 4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight 7. Promote efficient system management and operations 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system
22 MAP 21 Performance Goals Safety: To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads Infrastructure condition: To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair Congestion reduction: To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System System reliability: To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system Freight movement and economic vitality: To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development Environmental sustainability: To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment Reduced project delivery delays: To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies work practices
23 MAP 21 Performance Measures National Highway Performance Program Condition of pavements and bridges within the Interstate and National Highway Systems Highway Safety Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Freight Movement
24 Highway Trust Fund
25 Ongoing Planning Efforts
26 Process Flow Chart
27 Connections 2040 RMP Goals What goes into these? A combination of the MAP 21 Planning Factors, MAP 21 National Performance Goals, and Regional Areas of Interest. How detailed will they be? Goals will consist of a brief phrase and 1 2 supporting sentences. How will they be used? The prioritization criteria will be drawn directly from the RMP Goals.
28 County Specific Guiding Principles What goes into these? A representation of the goals and objectives from each county s Comprehensive Plan and other relevant concepts identified by each county, with consideration for the RMP Goals. How detailed will they be? Guiding Principles will be generalized statements that don t require adoption. How will they be used? Guiding Principles will be used for two major functions: Serve as a framework through which project recommendations are developed; and Influence the identification of policy and program strategies that promote a countywide vision.
29 Opportunities Plan What goes into this? The Opportunities Plan will primarily be a compilation of the project recommendations established by each county. If needed, additional projects may be added to help promote consistent connections between the counties. How detailed will this be? The Opportunities Plan represents the overall unconstrained vision for the region. Opportunities (projects) within each county will be quilted together to create a composite Opportunities Plan for the region. The Opportunities Plan is intended to be a compilation of real, specific projects as opposed to a policy approach (i.e. sidewalks should be located on both sides of all streets). How will they be used? Regionally, the Opportunities Plan will provide a set of projects from which the Needs and Cost Feasible Plans will be developed. At a county level, the Opportunities Plan may serve as the transportation vision for future Comprehensive Plan updates.
30 Needs Plan What goes into this? The Needs Plan will be composed of projects that address deficiencies identified through analysis. The Needs Plan will respond to existing and projected future deficiencies. How detailed will this be? Projects within the Needs Plan will be specific enough to respond to identified deficiencies and only include the number and type of projects necessary to mitigate these needs. How will they be used? Needs Plan projects will be evaluated based on the RMP s prioritization process. Based on the outcome of this prioritization exercise, this list will be further constrained to ultimately arrive at the Cost Feasible Plan.
31 Cost Feasible Plan What goes into this? The Cost Feasible Plan represents the list of projects that can reasonably be expected to receive funding within the 2040 plan horizon. The list of projects will be determined through the prioritization process of the Needs Plan. How detailed will this be? The Cost Feasible Plan projects will be described in the minimum degree of detail necessary to determine probable implementation costs. How will they be used? The Cost Feasible Plan is the federally required portion of the planning process. Project sheets will be developed for the first 10 years of the Cost Feasible Plan to help add clarity and detail to the project elements.
32 Prioritization Process and Measures of Effectiveness The Prioritization Process is intended to evaluate projects included in the Needs Plan. Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) are criteria that will be used to evaluate these recommendations. MOEs will be identified and weighted using input from the Connections 2040 RMP Goals as well as MAP 21 Performance Measures. How detailed will this be? MOEs used in the prioritization exercise will be specifically defined using a quantitative process. A summary of the methodology used to define each MOE will be included as part of the planning process. How will they be used? The Prioritization Process identifies project groupings that can be used as a starting point from which to develop the Cost Feasible Plan.
33 Process Flow Chart
34 GOAL SETTING
35 Connections 2040 RMP Goals Considerations for Goal Setting Building from existing goals High level Inclusive, not exclusive Align with performance criteria Address MAP 21 planning factors
36 2035 RMP Goals Access Connectivity Coordination Economic Development Financial Feasibility Land Use Multimodalism Natural Resource Protection/Conservation Public Participation Safety and Public Health Security
37 Access Provide residents and visitors with access to a multi modal transportation system and to goods and services throughout the region. MAP 21 Planning Factors Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiencies
38 Connectivity Enhance local and regional connectivity to effectively and safely move people and goods using multiple modes of transportation. MAP 21 Planning Factors Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiencies
39 Coordination To promote efficient and thorough implementation of the regional mobility plan by ensuring broad buy in and stakeholder support for the regional mobility planning process, the plan itself, and its constituent projects.
40 Economic Development Create and maintain a transportation infrastructure that provides energy and time efficient intermodal movement of goods, services, and labor to and within urban areas in the region. MAP 21 Planning Factors Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiencies Promote efficient system management and operations Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system
41 Financial Feasibility To ensure that the funding for desired regional mobility projects is met and that necessary revenues are made available timely for the successful implementation of priority projects that promote sustainability, more efficient use of resources, and regional connectivity. MAP 21 Planning Factors Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns
42 Land Use Coordinate transportation and land use systems to foster vibrant communities with compact urban forms throughout the region. MAP 21 Planning Factors Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns
43 Multimodalism There are many forms of transportation in the region, some untapped and to be utilized in the future. The Regional Mobility Plan must create and maintain opportunities to facilitate the movement of and connections among people, jobs, goods and services. MAP 21 Planning Factors Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight
44 Natural Resource Protection/Conservation A transportation system that provides access and mobility, supports compact growth and protects the region s natural environment. MAP 21 Planning Factors Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns
45 Public Participation The Regional Mobility Plan must have a strong Public Involvement Plan to ensure that all citizens of the regional have the opportunity to provide input in the transportation planning process.
46 Safety and Public Health Improve public health by increasing choice, safety, and access of transportation facilities for all segments of the population. MAP 21 Planning Factors Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight
47 Security Promote and implement transportation system improvements for all modes maximizing security of the transportation system. MAP 21 Planning Factors Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users
48 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT APPROACH
49 Public Involvement Priorities Quantifiable and measurable Forum for more informed decisions Active and passive outreach opportunities Geographically and demographically diverse Well documented
50 Involvement Techniques CRTPA Board Meetings and Retreats CMAC and TAC Meetings Transit Committees County Work Sessions (series of 2) Stakeholder Interviews Public Workshops (series of 3) Newsletters and Blasts Project Website Social Media Interactive Map Project Questionnaires Phone Survey Public/Community Events (up to 5)
51 Upcoming Outreach Project Website Project Facebook page MetroQuest survey Project questionnaire Interactive map Timeline: end of April
52 Upcoming Outreach Week of May 5 TAC and CMAC Meetings Week of May 19 CRTPA Board Meeting County work sessions Public workshops
53 COUNTY TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES
54
55 County Transportation Strategies The County Transportation Strategies are a series of documents tailored to each of the 4 counties in the CRTPA region. Major elements within each County Transportation Strategy will include: County Specific Guiding Principles County Specific Opportunities Plan Identified Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan projects from the Connections 2040 RMP Project sheets by county for the first 10 years of the Cost Feasible Plan Strategies for policy or program enhancements within each county
56 How Will They Be Used? Counties are encouraged to use the CTS in ways that they determine to be appropriate. However, the CTS will be structured to integrate with local comprehensive plans and position local communities for enhanced partnership opportunities
Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014
H.R. 4348, THE MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY ACT CONFERENCE REPORT Summary of Key Highway and Research Provisions The following summary is intended to highlight thee highway and research
More informationTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016
Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment
More informationImplementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County
The transportation system serves Cambria County communities because people make decisions and take action toward the stated goals of the long-range transportation plan. Locally, these people include officials
More informationPublic Participation Plan
Lowcountry Area Transportation Study (LATS) Metropolitan Planning Organization Approved January 24, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction and Background... 1 Purpose... 1 LATS Organization... 4 Public Participation
More informationTRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions
TRANSPORTATION STATEMENT OF BASIC PHILOSOPHY The National Association of Counties (NACo) believes that the nation s transportation system is a vital component in building and sustaining communities, moving
More informationSMART SCALE Policy Guide
What is SMART SCALE? Virginia s SMART SCALE ( 33.2 21.4) is about picking the right transportation projects for funding and ensuring the best use of limited tax dollars. It is the method of scoring planned
More informationSAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background
SAFETEA-LU This document provides information related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) that was previously posted on the Center for
More informationPurpose. Funding. Eligible Projects
SMART SCALE is a statewide program that distributes funding based on a transparent and objective evaluation of projects that will determine how effectively they help the state achieve its transportation
More informationFUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources
Appendix I. Funding Sources FUNDING SOURCES planning and related efforts can be funded through a variety of local, state, and federal sources. However, these revenues have many guidelines in terms of how
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN GENERAL The City of Tyler currently serves as the fiscal agent for the Tyler Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which represents the Tyler Metropolitan Study Area.
More informationCALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018 Calvert County Planning Commission St. Mary s County Department of County Services Plaza
More informationThe Public Participation Plan for Transportation Planning
2017 The Public Participation Plan for Transportation Planning Adopted by TCRPC Commission on April 26, 2017 3135 Pine Tree Road, Suite 2C Lansing, Michigan 48911 Toll Free: 1.800.619.6676 Phone: 517.393.0342
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Town of Hope Mills Multi-Modal Congestion Management Plan September 19, 2016 Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Proposal Due Date: 3:00 PM Eastern Time, 28 th October,
More information2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds
2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds INTRODUCTION As described in the adopted 2018 Policy Framework for PSRC s Federal Funds, the policy focus for the 2018 project selection
More informationAppendix E: Grant Funding Sources
Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN 10263 The Kankakee County Planning Department, acting as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Kankakee, Illinois Urbanized Area and through the Policy Committee
More informationRural Planning Work Program
Rural Planning Work Program For the Rural Transportation Planning Program Fiscal Years 2017-18 and 2018-19 The Appalachian Council of Governments Adopted Friday, June 23, 2017 The purpose of the RPWP is
More information2016 DOT Discretionary Grants
+ 2016 DOT Discretionary Grants Presented by: Robert Mariner Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy United States Department of Transportation + 2 $500 million multimodal, merit-based
More information2016 Public Participation Plan. Florida-Alabama Transportation Planning Organization (TPO)
2016 Public Participation Plan Florida-Alabama Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) April 13, 2016 Florida-Alabama Transportation Planning Organization Public Participation Plan April 13, 2016 with
More informationExhibit B. Plumas County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan SCOPE OF WORK
Exhibit B Plumas County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT INTRODUCTION: The proposed project is the development of a legally compliant Plumas County Non- Motorized Transportation
More informationAppendix Tactics and Metrics from State Agencies and Organizations
Appendix Tactics and Metrics from State Agencies and Organizations Florida s Economic Development Vision: Florida will have the nation s top performing economy and be recognized as the world s best place
More informationTransportation Planning in the Denver Region
The Prospectus Transportation Planning in the Denver Region TAC Draft (as of June 16, 2011) Approved December 2004 Revised November 2006 Revised August 2007 Revised March 2009 Revised 2011 Key revisions
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Uptown Main Street/US 25 Traffic Calming Analysis. Date Issued: June 5, 2018
i REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Uptown Main Street/US 25 Traffic Calming Analysis Date Issued: June 5, 2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) INSTRUCTIONS 1.1 Project Introduction The City of Greenwood (City) desires
More informationHB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide:
HB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide: http://virginiahb2.com/resources.html What funds are available to projects through HB2? (See Policy Guide Section 1.0 1.1 and Policy
More informationRegional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft
Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1 FINAL Draft Fresno Council of Governments January 2018 1 Introduction Fresno Council of Governments is simultaneously soliciting Regional
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Community Development Department Planning & Zoning Division REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS COMBINED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/ SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN State Project No. ATPL-5169 (048) RELEASE DATE: SEPTEMBER 23,
More informationDirector of Transportation Planning
Director of Transportation Planning The Lehigh Valley Planning Commission (LVPC) is seeking a candidate for Director of Transportation Planning to lead a team developing and managing the implementation
More informationAppendix E Federal and State Funding Categories
Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories This page left blank intentionally. Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E E 3 Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Highway Programs
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SCCOG REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 5 Connecticut Avenue, Norwich, Connecticut 06360 (860) 889-2324/Fax: (860) 889-1222/Email: office@seccog.org REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SCCOG REGIONAL
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Prepared for: Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization for the Gainesville Urbanized Area 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN Prepared by: Atkins Global & Quest Corporation
More informationNorthern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1
Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 State Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 I. Work Program Purpose Each year the Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal
More informationTxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program
TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program RANDY C. HOPMANN, P.E. DIRECTOR OF DISTRICT OPERATIONS TXAPA s 42nd Annual Meeting September 22, 2016 Highway Transportation in Texas: Today and Our Future
More informationMOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY
MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional
More informationPROJECT SELECTION Educational Series
PROJECT SELECTION 2017 Educational Series PROJECT SELECTION THE PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS Understanding how the state s roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure are selected for funding helps
More informationSMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.
SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently
More informationMETHODOLOGY - Scope of Work
The scope of work for the Truckee West River Site Redevelopment Feasibility Study will be undertaken through a series of sequential steps or tasks and will comprise four major tasks as follows. TASK 1:
More informationPlease complete your phone connection now:
Today s seminar will begin shortly. Please complete your phone connection now: 1. Dial the toll free number: 1-866-275-3495. 2. Enter the meeting number *4671867* on your phone keypad. Enter the star (*)
More informationINTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE... 2 SECTION I: LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION CONTEXT... 3 SECTION II: MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR GROWTH AND TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY CENTERS... 5 SECTION
More informationFLORIDA-ALABAMA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2017 PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Scope of Work
FLORIDA-ALABAMA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2017 PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Scope of Work Project Name: Purpose: Florida-Alabama TPO 2017 Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan Update To provide
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan
October 23rd, 2015 Attention: Qualified and Interested Consultants REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan The Posey County Economic Development Partnership, cooperatively
More information2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects
2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects Regional Solicitation Workshop April 17 2018 Regional Solicitation Purpose To distribute federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP)
More informationModule 2 Planning and Programming
Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access
More informationDistrict 8 New Funding Project Selection
District 8 New Funding Project Selection Jon Huseby District Engineer ATP 8 Presentation October 4, 2017 District 8 mndot.gov FY 2018 2021 Approach to 2017 New Funding 10/4/2017 2 Distribution of 17 New
More informationAppendix 5 Freight Funding Programs
5. Chapter Heading Appendix 5 Freight Programs Table of Contents 4.1 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG);... 5-1 4.2 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consultant Service to Conduct a Visioning Study and Prepare Recommendations for the Culver City Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District September 2016 RFP Released: September
More information2018 Call for Projects Guidebook
2018 Call for Projects Guidebook Project Selection for the NFRMPO CMAQ, STBG, and TA Programs in FY2022 and FY2023 October 8, 2018 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Section 1 - Call Overview... 2 1.1
More informationNORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF CEDAR HILL CITY CENTER TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN August 19, 2011 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
More informationAPPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT
APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT Background As the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Greater Kansas City, MARC is responsible for facilitating the development of long-range transportation
More informationPublic Participation Process
Public Participation Process Getting early input from the citizens of Nevada who use our transportation system was a key component in the update of this Plan. And that input has helped shape the long-term
More informationMark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH
Mark A. Doctor, PE Professional Profile A career of over 27 years with the Federal Highway Administration in various transportation engineering positions with diverse experiences and accomplishments in
More informationKYOVA Interstate Planning Commission
KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to
More informationTransportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review
Fiscal Research Division Hiighway Fund and Hiighway Trust Fund Secondary Roads Program Transportation Justification Review March 24, 2007 The General Assembly should eliminate or reduce funding for the
More informationBOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Fiscal Year 2016 Unified Planning Work Program Approved by Policy Committee - April 13, 2015 Prepared by Bowling Green-Warren County Metropolitan
More informationLong-Range Planning Public Engagement Plan 2018 Amendments
Long-Range Planning Public Engagement Plan 2018 Amendments The City of Tacoma does not discriminate on the basis of disability in any of its programs, activities, or services. To request this information
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/ 1 Transportation Alternatives Program Authorized
More informationCRTPA TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE (TA) PROGRAM DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA. November 18, 2013
CRTPA TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE (TA) PROGRAM DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA November 18, 2013 CRTPA TA Program Background At March 25, 2013 Board Meeting, members approved a timeline associated with the establishment
More informationSUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014
SUMMARY OF THE ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) submitted the Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency,
More informationTransportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department
Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department 2 Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council 3 4 Transportation Improvement
More informationWashington State Department of Transportation
Washington State Department of Transportation Executive Order 14-04 Washington Carbon Pollution Reduction and Clean Energy Action Review of state grant programs to identify and implement opportunities
More information$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads
1400 K Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 658-8200 Fax: (916) 658-8240 www.cacities.org $5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets
More informationThis page left blank intentionally.
6 Public Participation This page left blank intentionally. 6 2 Moving Forward Monterey Bay 2035 Introduction AMBAG values public participation in the development of the 2035 MTP/SCS. Public involvement
More informationFY 2013 Competitive Resource Allocation National Guidance (revised 5/11/12)
FY 2013 Competitive Resource Allocation National Guidance (revised 5/11/12) Introduction The delivery of State & Private Forestry (S&PF) programs assumes that our collective efforts are most effective
More informationTransportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003
Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003 Why Transportation Demand Management (TDM)? Demand management measures support a sustainable
More informationAPPENDIX 5. Funding Plan
STUDY: FINAL REPORT APPENDIX 5 Funding Plan May 2015 V:\2073\active\2073009060\report\DRAFT Final Report\rpt_MalPCH_DRAFTFinalReport-20150515.docx Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study: Funding Plan City
More information49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 49 - TRANSPORTATION SUBTITLE VI - MOTOR VEHICLE AND DRIVER PROGRAMS PART B - COMMERCIAL CHAPTER 311 - COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL AUTHORITY AND STATE GRANTS 31100. Purpose
More informationCommunity Engagement Plan
Preliminary Draft Community Engagement Plan for the Kings/Tulare Cross Valley Passenger Rail Plan August 1, 2016 Draft Prepared for: Tulare County Association of Governments Benjamin Kimball, Deputy Executive
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area
FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation
More informationExecutive Summary. Northern Virginia District (NOVA) Smart Travel Program. Virginia Department of Transportation. December 1999
Executive Summary Northern Virginia District (NOVA) Smart Travel Program Virginia Department of Transportation December 1999 VDOT Technical Manager: Amy Tang NOVA District Smart Travel Program Manager
More informationUrban Partnership Communications Plan
Urban Partnership Communications Plan CONTENTS URBAN PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW 01 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 02 TOLLING 04 TRANSIT 05 TECHNOLOGY 06 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT 07 APPENDICES A: SR 520 Bridge Tolling
More informationPUBLIC INVOLVEMENT GUIDELINES FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS Draft for Public Comment. January 15, 2014
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT GUIDELINES FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS Draft for Public Comment January 15, 2014 Washington County s Department of Land Use & Transportation respects civil rights
More information2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS
2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..
More informationHOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?
HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP? The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, known as the STIP, is a list that shows prioritization, funding, and scheduling of transportation projects and programs
More informationFLORENCE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY
FLORENCE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Federal ID #57 6000351 Fiscal Year 2014 Funding provided by: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and FLORENCE COUNTY www.florenceco.org/offices/planning/flats/
More informationRegional Prioritization Priorities and Process
Regional Prioritization Priorities and Process October 2018 Regional Prioritization Initiative Adopted April 2013 Revised October 2018 Background The Central Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization
More informationCapital Circle Southwest (SR 263)
Capital Circle Southwest (SR 263) from Crawfordville Road (US 319) to Blountstown Highway (SR 20) Tallahassee, Florida FPID 415782-4 Public Hearing December 4, 2014 This Public Hearing is being held in
More informationExpected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016
Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation September 2016 SMART SCALE Safety Factors Evaluation 1. Using Crash Modification Factors for SMART SCALE Safety Evaluation
More informationODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process
ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process The Ohio Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction to ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process 3 1.1 Public Involvement
More informationCoolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan
Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan A Partnership Among the City of Coolidge, Town of Florence, and ADOT FINAL REPORT Kimley-Horn Kimley Kimley-Horn and and Associates, Associates, Inc. Inc.
More information9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs
9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs 9.1. Grant Funding Overview Grant funding continues to be a key factor for ports in meeting capital investment requirements. Grants can
More information9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS
9. REVENUE SOURCES This Chapter summarizes multimodal revenue sources and estimates that are applicable to the City of Coolidge and the Town of Florence, together with financial constraints and opportunities
More informationHB2 Update October, 2014
HB2 Update October, 2014 The revised draft of the FY15-20 SYIP was released for public comment in September and the public comment period is open through October 30th. This revision reflects revised revenue
More informationRequest for Proposals (RFP) for Professional Planning Services Burlington VT, Downtown/Waterfront Plan Transportation Study
Department of Planning and Zoning 149 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Telephone: (802) 865-7188 (802) 865-7195 (FAX) (802) 865-7142 (TTY) www.ci.burlington.vt.us David E. White, AICP, Director Ken Lerner,
More informationMiTIP APPLICATION PACKET
SFY 2022-2023 Illustrative Projects 2018-2021 INDIANAPOLIS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (IRTIP) MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization October 2017 This
More informationCapital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for
Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for 2018-19 Introduction The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program
More informationOverview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
Overview of the 2017-2020 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Table of Contents What is the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)?... 1 What is the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)?... 1
More informationGAO HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Further Efforts Needed to Address Data Limitations and Better Align Funding with States Top Safety Priorities
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate November 2008 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Further Efforts
More informationR E G I O N A L PLANNING CO MMISSION P O L I C I E S A N D P R O C E D U R E S MANUAL
R E G I O N A L PLANNING CO MMISSION P O L I C I E S A N D P R O C E D U R E S MANUAL Regional Planning Commission Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Tammany, and Tangipahoa Parishes 10
More informationTitle VI: Public Participation Plan
Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom
More informationLorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce
Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Alma Area Chamber of Commerce Tuesday, July 18, 2017 New Name New Identity 1929 Arkansas Highway and Department of Lands 1977 Arkansas State
More informationProject Selection Advisory Council
Project Selection Advisory Council March 13, 2014 Sheri Warrington, Manager of MPO Activities Office of Transportation Planning 1 Project Selection Criteria Best Practices Degree of implementation in other
More informationSustainable Communities Grant Consortium Consortium Agreement
Sustainable Communities Grant Consortium Consortium Agreement WHEREAS, In June 2009, the U.S. Departments of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Transportation, and the Environmental Protection Agency
More informationPublic Involvement Plan
Public Involvement Plan For the Regional Transportation Plan Update Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Approved on June 8, 2016 Prepared for: CAMPO Prepared by: JLA Public Involvement, Inc.
More informationAssociation of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds
More informationJOPLIN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY ORGANIZATION
JOPLIN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM NOVEMBER 1, 2008 TO OCTOBER 31, 2009 City of Joplin Department of Public Works Division of Planning & Community Development 602
More informationRoanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2012 Legislative Policies
Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2012 Legislative Policies The Roanoke Regional Chamber works on behalf of its members to create a thriving business climate, strengthen private enterprise, and improve
More informationSupport the House provision (Section 1100) establishing a Critical Commerce Corridors Program.
November 1, 01 The Honorable James Inhofe, Chairman Senate Environment and Public Works The Honorable Barbara Boxer, Ranking Member Senate Environment and Public Works The Honorable Bill Shuster, Chairman
More informationFY Transportation Improvement Program
(CHATS) Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010-2015 June 8, 2009 1 Amendment Adopted: _September 24, 2009_ Amendment Adopted: _February 5, 2010 Amendment Adopted: May 17, 2010 Amendment Adopted: June
More informationRegional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC)
Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC) January 26, 2018 9:30 11:00 a.m. PSRC Board Room 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 9:30 1. Introductions and Announcements Don Cairns, Chair
More informationA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES
Exhibit A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Purpose The South Florida Commuter services vendor (hereinafter referred to as Vendor ) for
More informationPUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2017 Educational Series PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Federal and state law both require the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to support and promote public transportation
More information