FORM A: UCLA IT Investment Request Form (FY XXXX-XXXX)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FORM A: UCLA IT Investment Request Form (FY XXXX-XXXX)"

Transcription

1 FORM A: UCLA IT Investment Request Form (FY XXXXXXXX) Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA Project Name: Project Sponsor(s): Project Manager(s): Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA System: Monroe, Student Affairs; Betty Glick, Division of Undergraduate Education; Project Owner(s): Monroe Gorden, Andrew Wissmiller Andrew Wissmiller, IT Services Arun Pasricha, Director Student Affairs IT Prepared by: Arun Pasricha Christian Spreitzer, Director Undergraduate Education IT Date: May 20, Project Profile / Background 1a) Describe the overall objective and importance of this project. The new MyUCLA project was initiated in response to a long standing student demand to integrate online student services under a unified portal and improve the workflow of many of the critical functions. Although an early leader in providing online functionality, UCLA had lagged behind the internet standards. Campus websites were fragmented along with the workflow, to the detriment of the quality of online services. The objective of the project was to address this urgent need and provide the foundation for the next generation of online student services on our campus. 1b) Is this project related or dependent on any other project or recent request? Yes (Please specify) X No 1c) Describe the proposed project management structure This project is managed by a crossorganizational oversight group. The group includes members from Student Affairs, IT Services, the Division of Undergraduate Education and Graduate Division. 1d) What type of project is this? 1e) When will this project be fully implemented? X Implementation of new technology system Less than one year X Implementation of emerging technology system Between one to two years X Replacement of legacy system X Between two to five years Other: More than five years 2. Key Stakeholders 2a) List the major stakeholders of this project and the importance of this project to each. This system impacts organizations across the entire campus ranging from administrative offices to academic departments. The entire student population, staff as well as faculty consume the services offered by this system. 2b) Does the project have the full support of key stakeholders? If so, who are they? If not, please explain. X Yes No (Please explain) Monroe Gorden, Andrew Wissmiller, Betty Glick Version Page 1 of 9

2 FORM A: UCLA IT Investment Request Form (FY XXXXXXXX) Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA 3. Project Costs / Funding Request 3a) Prior Funding: Have you requested funding for this project and/or system before? If so from whom, when and for what purpose? X Yes (Please specify) No 3b) Summary of Estimated Costs: The following data is derived from the attached Financial Worksheet (Form C). TOTAL PROJECT COSTS / FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Development & Maintenance (OneTime / Temporary) Costs Permanent Main Categories: FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY xxxx 1 Software 13,800 2 Hardware 81,000 3 Implementation Costs 4 Consulting Services 5 Salaries 1,155,000 6 Additional Software Licenses 3,600 7 Miscellaneous 10, Total Project Costs 1,263,400 Less: Funding Offsets #DIV/0! 765,200 61% Remaining Balance #DIV/0! 498,200 39% 3c) Request for Chancellor's Funds: 498,200 3d) Use of Requested Chancellorial Funds: Explain what the Chancellor's funds will be used for. The requested funding will be used to hire 2 FTE specializing in.net programming and one FTE specializing in frontend UX design and analysis. These resources will be dedicated for continued development and maintenance of MyUCLA. They will also assist other campus organizations to migrate their student and staff functions to MyUCLA. The funding request also includes amount for MyUCLA related infrastructure and hardware. Version Page 2 of 9

3 FORM B: UCLA IT Investment Request Rating & Justification Form (FY XXXXXXXX) Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA May 20, ) Strategic Impact: 1a) Describe the impact this project will have on the overall campus strategic initiative and/or the institutional mission of teaching, research or public service: MyUCLA supports the core mission of the campus by providing central functionalities such as enrollment, bill pay, financial aid information etc. With URSA sunset, it is now the only website on campus to provide these critical features. Besides presenting the largest set of student services, MyUCLA also supports critical faculty functions such as Gradebook. The first deployment of the new MyUCLA has delivered numerous feature sets and functionality that has elevated the online web experience for the campus community. 1b) Does this project align with any UC, Statewide or National initiative? Yes (Please explain) X No 1c) Check the appropriate box. 1. None No strategic impact 3. Moderate Some strategic impact 2. Low Minimimal strategic impact X 4. Significant Necessary and significant strategic impact 2) Compliance Requirement: 2a) Is this project a requirement of the campus by any campus, Regental, State or Federal policy and/or regulation? Yes (Please specify) X No 2b) Describe how this project will meet the stated policies and/or regulations requirements and the measureable impacts. 2c) Describe the existing risk or exposure with the current situation. The disparate and outdated websites were presenting a serious competitive disadvantage to UCLA and were also hampering the quality of services available to our current students. Students had repeatedly raised concerns with the deficiencies of the legacy systems in multiple forums and Daily Bruin Editorials. These inputs reflected the fast degrading level of student satisfaction with UCLA s online services. Phase 1 of the new MyUCLA has successfully alleviated a significant number of these deficiencies in online student services. However, without campus funding going forward, it will not be feasible to complete the vision of the new MyUCLA, and finally meet the expectations of UCLA s websavvy student population. 2d) Check the appropriate box. X 1. None No measurable impact on compliance requirements. 2. Low Small impact on compliance requirements. 3. Moderate Necessary to maintain current compliance requirements. 4. Significant Demonstrates measurable improvement and necessity for compliance. Version Page 3 of 9

4 FORM B: UCLA IT Investment Request Rating & Justification Form (FY XXXXXXXX) Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA May 20, ) System Lifecycle Necessity: 3a) Is this project a replacement and/or upgrade of an existing enterprise or campus system? Please explain. X Yes No The new MyUCLA is an enterprise student services portal and is both a replacement and an upgrade of existing websites providing online student services including URSA, legacy MyUCLA and MyFAO. 3b) Describe any system lifecycle issues and its impact: The new MyUCLA replaced URSA, legacy MyUCLA and MyFAO. All these websites had reached the end of their lifecycle and urgently needed to be upgraded. These websites were significantly hampering the students online interaction with outdated user interface and fragmented workflow. 3c) Is project highly likely to be developed on time and on budget and fulfill functional specifications? Please explain X Yes Student Affairs, IT Services and the College have been highly successful in delivering Phase 1 of this project on schedule even with no additional No campus funding. These three development teams have a proven track record in working collaboratively and adjusting to changes in milestones without ff ti th ll j t It i f ll t d th t th k tli d f thi f di t ill b l t d ithi b d t d h d l 3d) Check the appropriate box: 1. None No system lifecycle issues exists. 2. Low Minimal system lifecycle needs will be addressed. 3. Moderate Some system lifecycle issues / needs will be addressed. X 4. Significant Necessary and significant system lifecycle issue will be addressed. 4) Customer/User Impact: 4a) Identify the number of individuals in the following four categories that will be affected by the request/proposed project: Make a Menu Selection: Group Quantity Faculty 4. > 1,000 Total Score: 20 Students Departmental Staff Central Admin Staff 4. > 1, > 1, > 1,000 Other: 4. > 1,000 Specify: Parents, Prospective Students etc 4b) Describe the tangible benefits and how they will measured. The primary measure of the success of the new MyUCLA is the seamless adoption of the new system by students and the resulting shut down of MyFAO and URSA. A new communication system is one of the main planned enhancements going forward. This system will enable students to seek information or counseling online, thereby significantly reducing the number of inperson appointments leading to an increase in operational efficiency for administrative offices. Other planned enhancements such as the new survey tool will reduce the cost of purchasing multiple survey tools across campus. Ability to combine survey data with student data will also provide significant value to the campus community. Finally, many of the planned Gradebook enhancements will allow an improved user experience for Faculty and for efficiency in grading multilisted classes, sharing of grading options etc. Version Page 4 of 9

5 FORM B: UCLA IT Investment Request Rating & Justification Form (FY XXXXXXXX) Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA May 20, c) Describe how likely this project will be well embraced and used by the intended users? Based on the feedback received for the new MyUCLA, the support for the new system is very strong with the campus. An analysis of functionality available on new MyUCLA as well as on URSA/MyFAO showed that students were overwhelmingly (>75%) using the new version on MyUCLA. This reaffirmed the decision to sunset both MyFAO (4/15/2014) and URSA (5/12/2014). Example of a student testimonial: The start of Spring Quarter is great thanks to the new MyUCLA format. It's nice that everything is on a central platform. It's very efficient and makes things a lot easier for me. Thank you! 4d) Describe any likely negative impacts on the intended and unintended users. 5) Workload Impact: 5a) Describe the likely impact of the project on workload (both positive and negative) and how it will be measured. For the administrative and counseling staff, the new communication system in MyUCLA will greatly simplify daily operational logistics since students will have the ability to communicate directly with offices online, while the office will have the ability to track and respond online. This will greatly improve the student experience as well as operational efficiency on campus. 5b) Describe the savings produced by the implementation of the project and how it will be measured. N/A 5c) Check the appropriate box: 1. None No measurable impact on workload or too difficult to measure. 2. Low Demonstrates minimal savings / impact on workload. X 3. Moderate Demonstrates some measurable savings / impact on workload. 4. Significant Demonstates measurable savings / impact on workload. 6) Financial/Fiscal Impact: 6a) Was a costbenefit analysis conducted? Summarize the key points below and attach supporting documentation. Yes X No Version Page 5 of 9

6 FORM B: UCLA IT Investment Request Rating & Justification Form (FY XXXXXXXX) Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA May 20, b) What is the financial impact of this project on the campus and department? Please explain. Potential source of revenue The new MyUCLA elevates the level of online services on our campus to a level commensurate to an institution like UCLA. X Financial savings New planned enhancements such as a campus survey tool and the new communication system will lead to improved efficiencies and substantial savings for the campus. Many campus offices were exploring the possibility to purchasing X Other vendor based systems for these services with significant investment. 6b) Specify the potential for generating revenue and/or cash savings for the departments and campus. Several departments were exploring the possibility of purchasing vendor based systems for services such as communication system and survey tools. These new enhancements in MyUCLA will not only lead to substantial savings but will also be far more integrated and consistent for improved quality of service. 6c) Check the appropriate box: 1. None No significant financial savings nor revenue. 2. Low Demonstrates minimal financial savings and/or revenue. 3. Moderate Demonstrates some measurable financial savings and/or revenue. X 4. Significant Demonstates measurable financial savings and/or revenue. 7) Additional Information 7a) What are the consequences of NOT doing this project? Without campus support, the quality of online services to students, staff and faculty will again become outdated and stagnant. Once again, services are likely to become fragmented and limited. Campus departments will be burdened to provide custom solutions on their own at great expense and with reduced quality. 7b) Describe any issues / constraints / barriers that impact the successful implementation of this project. Additional infrastructural and staffing resources are requested to meet the goals of this project. 7c) Describe any additional justification and/or rationale for this request / project not reflected in the criteria listed above. Version Page 6 of 9

7 FORM C: UCLA IT Investment Project Financial Worksheet Integrated Web Experience The New MyUCLA Date: Prepared by: May 20, 2014 Arun Pasricha Summary of Costs and Available Funding Offsets Estimated Total Project Costs Estimated Five Year Development & Maintenance (Onetime Investment) Costs Permanent Costs Categories: FY XX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX Total FY xxxx 1 Software 13,800 2 Hardware 81,000 3 Implementation Costs 4 Consulting Services 5 Salaries 1,155,000 6 Additional Software Licenses 3,600 7 Miscellaneous 10, TOTAL Costs: 1,263,400 Funding Offsets Estimated Five Year Development & Maintenance (Onetime Investment) Costs Permanent Costs Funding Source FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX Total FY xxxx A Student Affairs Salaries 420,000 B College Salaries 300,000 C Student Affairs Software 2,350 D Student Affairs Hardware 20,250 E Division of Undergraduate Education Software 2,350 F Division of Undergraduate Education Hardware 20,250 G TOTALS: 765,200 Remaining (Unfunded) Balance: 498,200 Version Page 7 of 9

8 Details of Estimated Project Costs Estimated Five Year Development & Maintenance (Onetime Investment) Costs Permanent Costs Category / Items FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX Total FY xxxx 1.0 Software 1.1 AppDynamics License (16 servers) 8, VMWare 2, VM Monitoring & Backup Software Windows OS; Data Center 3, Subtotal: 13, Hardware 2.1 Load Balancer 23, Servers 26, SAN 24, Backup Equipment and DR Services 8, Subtotal: 81, Implementation Costs Subtotal: 4.0 Consulting Services Subtotal: 5.0 Salaries 5.1 Student Affairs Staff 420, Undergraduate Eduction IT Staff 300, New.Net Developers 290, New Analyst with UX Expertise 145, Subtotal: 1,155, Additional Software Licenses 6.1 SQL Server Licenses 3, Subtotal: 3, Miscellaneous 7.1 Training; Adhoc consulting; Conferences; Special Software Licenses 10,000 Version Page 8 of 9

9 Details of Estimated Project Costs Estimated Five Year Development & Maintenance (Onetime Investment) Costs Permanent Costs Category / Items FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX FY XXXX Total FY xxxx Subtotal: 10, Subtotal: Subtotal: Subtotal: TOTALS: 1,263,400 Financial Assumptions: Describe any particular assumptions that have been made to impact the financial estimates (such as annual inflationary rates, benefits, FTE average salary, etc.). Ref. Notes Version Page 9 of 9

Shared Services for Research Administration

Shared Services for Research Administration Shared Services for Research Administration Design, Implementation and Lessons Learned Laura Kozma Director, Research Administration & Faculty Services Sponsored Program Services Office of the Vice President

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND TRAINING (ART) GRANTS PROGRAM Proposal Response Guidance

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND TRAINING (ART) GRANTS PROGRAM Proposal Response Guidance Introduction The purpose of the Administrative Reviews and Training (ART) Grants Program Proposal Response Guidance is to increase the consistency and understanding of program planning prior to grant award.

More information

OFFICE OF THE CIO STANDARD: 001 EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 03, 2007 INFORMATIONAL VERSION: 1.0

OFFICE OF THE CIO STANDARD: 001 EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 03, 2007 INFORMATIONAL VERSION: 1.0 OFFICE OF THE CIO STANDARD: 001 EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 03, 2007 INFORMATIONAL VERSION: 1.0 Project Management of Major or Large NDUS Information Technology Projects Purpose This standard will ensure

More information

Project Request and Approval Process

Project Request and Approval Process The University of the District of Columbia Information Technology Project Request and Approval Process Kia Xiong Information Technology Projects Manager 13 June 2017 Table of Contents Project Management

More information

SOLICITATION OF INTEREST

SOLICITATION OF INTEREST CHANCELLOR S OFFICE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIVISION PART ONE OF A TWO-PART REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS (RFA # 17-055) SOLICITATION OF INTEREST for the

More information

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012 A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012 Introduction The Computer-Based Record Institute (CPRI) established the

More information

bd.com Pyxis Enterprise Server

bd.com Pyxis Enterprise Server Pyxis Enterprise Server Flexible enterprise-ready server deployment options The Pyxis Enterprise Server provides hospitals and health systems a scalable, flexible foundation for managing Pyxis ES platform

More information

HEALTH WORKFORCE SUPPLY AND REQUIREMENTS PROJECTION MODELS. World Health Organization Div. of Health Systems 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland

HEALTH WORKFORCE SUPPLY AND REQUIREMENTS PROJECTION MODELS. World Health Organization Div. of Health Systems 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland HEALTH WORKFORCE SUPPLY AND REQUIREMENTS PROJECTION MODELS World Health Organization Div. of Health Systems 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland The World Health Organization has long given priority to the careful

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and

More information

Georgia Institute of Technology Technology Fee Funding Proposal Request Process

Georgia Institute of Technology Technology Fee Funding Proposal Request Process Georgia Institute of Technology Technology Fee Funding Proposal Request Process REVISED 12/5/2016 Explanation of Fee: The Technology Fee is a mandatory student fee charged to each student who is enrolled

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Army Integ Military Human Resources Sys (A-IMRS)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Army Integ Military Human Resources Sys (A-IMRS) Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 100.500 68.693-68.693 53.968 64.534

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

PL Performance Level

PL Performance Level BASS BDS017 2017-19 Biennium Budget Decision Package Agency: 540 Employment Security Department (ESD) Decision Package Code/Title: EX Ex-offender Employment Budget Period: 2017-2019 Budget Level: PL Performance

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016

More information

JOINT STAFF FY 2006/2007 Budget Estimates Submissions Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide

JOINT STAFF FY 2006/2007 Budget Estimates Submissions Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Exhibit R-3, Project Analysis Exhibit R-3, Project Analysis : February 2005 RDT&E, Defense Wide, Joint Staff 0400 / BA 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0902298J Management Headquarters PROJECT NAME: FCB Studies Categories

More information

APPLICATION FOR THE 2006 LARRY L. SAUTTER AWARD FOR INNOVATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

APPLICATION FOR THE 2006 LARRY L. SAUTTER AWARD FOR INNOVATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION FOR THE 2006 LARRY L. SAUTTER AWARD FOR INNOVATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY University of California, Irvine Equity Advisor Online Equity Process SUMMARY Currently equity is a decentralized

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #142 To Complete Total

More information

Internal Audit Services Report on Activities Fiscal Year 2014 September 2014

Internal Audit Services Report on Activities Fiscal Year 2014 September 2014 Internal Audit Services Report on Activities Fiscal Year 2014 September 2014 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Mission 4 Audit Program 5 Advisory Services 13 External Audits 16 Investigations 20

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY... 1 BACKGROUND Organizational Structure and Personnel... 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY... 1 BACKGROUND Organizational Structure and Personnel... 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY... 1 BACKGROUND... 2 Organizational Structure and Personnel... 4 Financial Information... 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 6 1. Financial Management...

More information

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES. Counseling Services Audit & Management Advisory Services Project #17-67

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES. Counseling Services Audit & Management Advisory Services Project #17-67 , DAVIS AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES Counseling Services Audit & Management Advisory Services Project #17-67 December 2017 Fieldwork Performed by: Ryan Dickson, Senior Auditor Reviewed by: Tony

More information

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS Student Technology Fee Florida Statute 1009.24 provides for a Technology Fee. The specific language of the statute is: A technology fee of up to 5 percent of the tuition per credit

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #82 To Program Element - -

More information

egovernment and ROI Daniel Darche Sierra Systems August 13, 2001 FTA Technology Conference Spokane, Washington

egovernment and ROI Daniel Darche Sierra Systems August 13, 2001 FTA Technology Conference Spokane, Washington egovernment and ROI Daniel Darche Sierra Systems August 13, 2001 FTA Technology Conference Spokane, Washington egovernment What is egovernment? Where is egovernment going? Why consider egovernment? Total

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

Parkway Proposed Initiative Form

Parkway Proposed Initiative Form Parkway Proposed Initiative Form The process Step 1 Complete Proposed Initiative Form as described in the directions on page 3. 1. The intent of this document is to begin to share ideas and clarify budget

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

More information

Position Justification Template

Position Justification Template Position Justification Template Attach completed form to HR Position Management request Section A: Position Information Requestor: Alisha Kreider & Val Adams Date: 8/7/2014 Department: Supplemental Staff

More information

ENDING FAMILY HOMELESSNESS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Business Plan

ENDING FAMILY HOMELESSNESS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Business Plan ENDING FAMILY HOMELESSNESS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Business Plan Overview The Heading Home Campaign will rapidly re-house at least 800 homeless families with children in the San Francisco

More information

Defense Health Program Operation and Maintenance Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Budget Estimates Information Management

Defense Health Program Operation and Maintenance Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Budget Estimates Information Management I. Description of Operations Financed: This Budget Activity Group provides for the /Information Technology resources dedicated to the operation and maintenance of Defense Health Program (DHP) facilities.

More information

Proposal to Increase M/W/ESB Utilization in PTE Contracting

Proposal to Increase M/W/ESB Utilization in PTE Contracting Proposal to Increase M/W/ESB Utilization in PTE Contracting Document Prepared by The City of Portland Office of Management and Finance Bureau of Purchases January 2003 This page intentionally left blank.

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE SE / Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-12) Initiative

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE SE / Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-12) Initiative Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 DoD Human Resources Activity : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD)

More information

Business Practice for IT Project and Procurement Governance

Business Practice for IT Project and Procurement Governance Page 1 of 17 PURPOSE: Describe the practice of submitting, reviewing and approving IT projects and procurements. BACKGROUND: A defined, organized and transparent practice for IT project and procurement

More information

Student Technology Fee AY 2017 Tech Initiatives Proposal Form. DUE April 3, 2017

Student Technology Fee AY 2017 Tech Initiatives Proposal Form. DUE April 3, 2017 Student Technology Fee AY 2017 Tech Initiatives Proposal Form DUE April 3, 2017 Project Title: Robotics Kit Replacement Department/Organization: Computer Science Project Applicant(s): Principal Contact

More information

a clean energy leader without specific measures to ensure that low-income households participate and benefit.

a clean energy leader without specific measures to ensure that low-income households participate and benefit. Serving 100,000 low-income New York households with solar by 2023 is an important step toward an equitable energy system. This plan outlines the path toward enough solar to save low-income communities

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 14.114 15.018-15.018 15.357 15.125

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Security Cooperation Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

Updates on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding. Virginia Anders, Acting Director, OCGA Evelyn Balabis, Director, EFM

Updates on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding. Virginia Anders, Acting Director, OCGA Evelyn Balabis, Director, EFM Updates on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding Virginia Anders, Acting Director, OCGA Evelyn Balabis, Director, EFM 15 OCGA ARRA Help Desk 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., Monday Friday 310-794-0548

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 13 P-1 Line #25

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 13 P-1 Line #25 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2031A: Aircraft Procurement, Army / BA 02: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 10: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+) #

More information

OCH Residential Government Constitution

OCH Residential Government Constitution OCH Residential Government Constitution Resident Government Council take on active roles by promoting True Bruin values on the Hill and upholding the Mission and Core Values of Residential Life. Resident

More information

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report 2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System-Increment 1 (DEAMS Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED

More information

Denver Public Schools 2008 Bond Program

Denver Public Schools 2008 Bond Program Denver Public Schools 2008 Bond Program Priority Allocation of Available Bond Savings Bond and Mill Levy Oversight Committee December 14, 2011 0 Overview Confirmed Project Savings Allocated May 2010: $75.6

More information

The Evolution of the Conference Room and the Technology Behind it

The Evolution of the Conference Room and the Technology Behind it WHITEPAPER The Evolution of the Conference Room and the Technology Behind it How a Shift in Demand Will Impact Technology, Support, and Users Bill Haskins Andy Nilssen Andrew Davis October 2013 Paper sponsored

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support

More information

Navigation 101 Grants Expansion, AN

Navigation 101 Grants Expansion, AN Agency: 350 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Budget Period: 2009-11 Recommendation Summary Text: Superintendent Bergeson is requesting resources for the Navigation 101 grant program: $9 million

More information

2012 National Patient Safety Goals and National Priorities Partnership Goals addressed in this case study

2012 National Patient Safety Goals and National Priorities Partnership Goals addressed in this case study (ROI) University of California Davis Health System 2315 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95817 Noel Sousa Finance Director noel.sousa@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu Michael Smith Financial Analyst michael.smith@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: May 2009 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, DW BA 06

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: May 2009 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, DW BA 06 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: May 2009 R-1 Item Nomenclature: Wounded, Ill and Injured Program, 0807708D8Z Cost ($ in millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Total PE Cost 0.000

More information

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO. Chair of the Assembly of the Academic Senate

BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO. Chair of the Assembly of the Academic Senate UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ACADEMIC SENATE BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ Jim Chalfant Telephone: (510) 987-0711 Fax: (510) 763-0309

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 32.797 23.511

More information

ICT Strategy for the Courts Service Update June 2009

ICT Strategy for the Courts Service Update June 2009 ICT Strategy for the Courts Service 2009-2011 Update June 2009 Contents 1. Executive Summary... 2 2. Introduction & Background... 5 3. Progress review of ICT Strategy 2006-2010... 6 4. Current Business

More information

Unified Communications Improves Business Outcomes, Lowers Costs, and Enhances Environmental Sustainability

Unified Communications Improves Business Outcomes, Lowers Costs, and Enhances Environmental Sustainability Unified Communications Improves Business Outcomes, Lowers Costs, and Enhances Environmental Sustainability Published: November 2010 Microsoft Information Technology (Microsoft IT) used a business value

More information

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST

More information

NOT-FOR-PROFIT INSIDER

NOT-FOR-PROFIT INSIDER NOT-FOR-PROFIT INSIDER VOLUME 9 :: ISSUE 3 In This Issue: Streamlining OMB Guidance For Federal Funding Of Nonprofit Organizations New 1023-EZ Makes Applying For 501(C)(3) Tax-Exempt Status Easier Identifying

More information

2.6.5 Replace Computers in Law Library Labs and Public Services Alcove Page 1 of 7

2.6.5 Replace Computers in Law Library Labs and Public Services Alcove Page 1 of 7 2.6.5 Replace Computers in Labs and Public Services Alcove Page 1 of 7 Submitting Organization(s): Contact Person Name: Nancy Johnson Contact Person Email: njohnson@gsu.edu Contact Person Phone: 404/651-4140

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 4.846 3.825 4.316-4.316 3.813 3.582 3.336 3.379 Continuing Continuing

More information

R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7

R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7 R-2 Exhibit RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE FEBRUARY 1999 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E,DW/BA7 COST ($ In Millions) R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Program Element (PE) Name and No. C3I INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 4: Advanced Component Development

More information

Revised Exceptional Item List for the Senate Finance Article II Work Group

Revised Exceptional Item List for the Senate Finance Article II Work Group Revised Exceptional Item List for the Senate Finance Article II Work Group Department of Family and Protective Services Carey Cockerell, Commissioner February 9, 2005 Summary Table of Revised Exceptional

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Logistic Support Activities FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Logistic Support Activities FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - - 0.944-0.944 0.299 0.846 0.746

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 75.7 122.481-122.481

More information

[Evelyn will get back to us this evening with her changes.]

[Evelyn will get back to us this evening with her changes.] Page 1 of 10 Introduction Hello, my name is Mary Burke, RN. I have more than 20 years of experience as a nurse; primarily in outpatient and clinic settings. I m now at the University of Iowa Hospitals

More information

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS G ELLUCIAN (Datatel) COLLEAGUE CONVERSION TO MS SQL AND RELATED UPGRADES PROJECT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS G ELLUCIAN (Datatel) COLLEAGUE CONVERSION TO MS SQL AND RELATED UPGRADES PROJECT SAN JOSE/EVERGREEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 4750 San Felipe Road, San Jose, CA 95135 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS G2010.0069 ELLUCIAN (Datatel) COLLEAGUE CONVERSION TO MS SQL AND RELATED UPGRADES PROJECT

More information

THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates

THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Information Systems Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 24.648 42.347 68.325-68.325 66.869 4.46 -

More information

Siebel Installation Guide for Microsoft Windows. Siebel Innovation Pack 2015, Rev. D November 2015

Siebel Installation Guide for Microsoft Windows. Siebel Innovation Pack 2015, Rev. D November 2015 Siebel Installation Guide for Microsoft Windows Siebel Innovation Pack 2015, Rev. D November 2015 Copyright 2005, 2015 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation

More information

Information Technology Management

Information Technology Management June 27, 2003 Information Technology Management Defense Civilian Personnel Data System Functionality and User Satisfaction (D-2003-110) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality Integrity

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years R1 Program

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PENSION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PENSION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PENSION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICES Submission Deadline: 11:59 p.m. March 8, 2015 980 9 th Street Suite 1900 Sacramento, CA 95814 SacRetire@saccounty.net

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Theater Battle Management (TBM) C4I FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Theater Battle Management (TBM) C4I FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 18.374 15.170 15.528-15.528 15.817 15.217

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 9.334 6.602 - - - - - - - 0.000 15.936 9.334 6.602 - - - - - -

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 13.610 13.355 12.874-12.874

More information

Sanilac County Community Mental Health Authority

Sanilac County Community Mental Health Authority Sanilac County Community Mental Health Authority 227 E. Sanilac Ave, Sandusky Michigan 48471 (810) 648-0330 Fax: (810) 648-0319 Request for Proposal Phone System and IP Phones Due Date: Wednesday, July

More information

Yucca Mountain and Interim Storage Proposed Appropriation Language

Yucca Mountain and Interim Storage Proposed Appropriation Language Proposed Appropriation Language NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL For Department of Energy expenses necessary for nuclear waste disposal activities to carry out the purposes of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,

More information

Allegations Concerning the Defense Logistics Agency Contract Action Reporting System (D )

Allegations Concerning the Defense Logistics Agency Contract Action Reporting System (D ) June 14, 2002 Acquisition Allegations Concerning the Defense Logistics Agency Contract Action Reporting System (D-2002-106) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability

More information

Military medics save lives in the field, and now get some

Military medics save lives in the field, and now get some Microsoft Windows Mobile Customer Solution Case study U.S. Military Improves Medical Care, Tactical Advantage with Wireless Point-of-care Handheld Assistant BMIS-T is much more than a simple record-keeping

More information

SMALL AND MIDSIZE BUSINESSES IN ASIA-PACIFIC

SMALL AND MIDSIZE BUSINESSES IN ASIA-PACIFIC Vendor Research Small and Midsize Businesses in Asia-Pacific JupiterResearch VENDOR RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. > >>>>>>> > > SMALL AND MIDSIZE BUSINESSES IN ASIA-PACIFIC Outsourcing

More information

RAILS Consortia Committee Anne Slaughter, RAILS Director of Technology Services FY2020 RAILS LLSAP Support Grant

RAILS Consortia Committee Anne Slaughter, RAILS Director of Technology Services FY2020 RAILS LLSAP Support Grant Fax: 630.734.5050 railslibraries.info 125 Tower Drive Burr Ridge IL 60527 630.734.5000 January 15, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RAILS Consortia Committee Anne Slaughter, RAILS Director of Technology Services

More information

K-12 Statewide Longitudinal Data System, AH

K-12 Statewide Longitudinal Data System, AH Agency: 350 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Budget Period: 2013-15 Recommendation Summary Text: Superintendent Dorn requests $1,174,000 to maintain and operate the K-12 Statewide Longitudinal

More information

Software Requirements Specification

Software Requirements Specification Software Requirements Specification Co-op Evaluation System Senior Project 2014-2015 Team Members: Tyler Geery Maddison Hickson Casey Klimkowsky Emma Nelson Faculty Coach: Samuel Malachowsky Project Sponsors:

More information

Rx for practice management

Rx for practice management Rx for practice management Spring 2015 Are you ready for the next step? The ins and outs of Stage 2 meaningful use Dissension in the ranks How to knock out physician conflicts Compensating providers for

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083

More information

Best Of Times Or Worst Of Times?

Best Of Times Or Worst Of Times? Best Of Times Or Worst Of Times? Emerging trends Turbulence abounds Out of difficult times come rare opportunities Entrepreneurs need nurturing more than ever Economic woes wreaking havoc on IPOs, M&As;

More information

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC SUBJECT: Implementation of Microsoft Windows 10 Secure Host Baseline

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC SUBJECT: Implementation of Microsoft Windows 10 Secure Host Baseline DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 1010 MEMORANDUM FOR: SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Implementation of Microsoft Windows 10 Secure Host Baseline FEB Z 6 2016 After consultation

More information

CLUSTER UPDATE PLAN ACADEMIC YR

CLUSTER UPDATE PLAN ACADEMIC YR CLUSTER UPDATE PLAN ACADEMIC YR 2011-2012 Cluster Update Plan The purpose of the Cluster Update Plan is to help Clusters: 1) utilize department/unit plans to develop priorities within each cluster; 2)

More information

GEOSPATIAL READINESS ANALYSIS CONCEPT FOR OSD PERSONNEL AND READINESS

GEOSPATIAL READINESS ANALYSIS CONCEPT FOR OSD PERSONNEL AND READINESS GEOSPATIAL READINESS ANALYSIS CONCEPT FOR OSD PERSONNEL AND READINESS Purpose Develop and discuss a concept for geospatial readiness analysis that incorporates: Geospatial depiction of plans and capabilities

More information

PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION (PDM)

PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION (PDM) FEMA GRANTS AND PROGRAMS PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION (PDM) FEMA s Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program provides funds to States, U.S. Territories, tribes, and communities for hazard mitigation planning and

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Force Integrated Personnel and Pay System (AF-IPPS) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Force Integrated Personnel and Pay System (AF-IPPS) FY 2012 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Complete Program Element 20.405 43.300 91.866-91.866 90.598 129.201

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

Community Health Centre Program

Community Health Centre Program MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE Community Health Centre Program BACKGROUND The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care s Community and Health Promotion Branch is responsible for administering and funding

More information

UC/CSU/IOU Energy Efficiency Partnership

UC/CSU/IOU Energy Efficiency Partnership UC/CSU/IOU Energy Efficiency Partnership 1. Projected Program Budget $ 6,830,972 2. Projected Program Impacts MWh 2,596 MW (Summer Peak) 0.55 3. Program Cost Effectiveness TRC 2.18 PAC 2.22 4. Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational s Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017

More information

Starting Small and Dreaming Big

Starting Small and Dreaming Big Starting Small and Dreaming Big DEVELOPING COLLABORATIVE GRANTSMANSHIP AT SMALL UNIVERSITIES WHITNEY GRAY, MA NOVEMBER 2015 Learning Outcomes IDENTIFICATION OF KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPING A GRANTS

More information

Vocera Communications: Vocera Benefits Study at St. Agnes Hospital

Vocera Communications: Vocera Benefits Study at St. Agnes Hospital Vocera Communications: Vocera Benefits Study at St. Agnes Hospital Prepared by First Consulting Group February 2004 Vocera Benefits Study at St. Agnes Hospital Executive Summary Inpatient healthcare delivery

More information