Min Value 2 Max Value 5 Mean 4.76 Variance 0.25 Standard Deviation 0.50 Total Responses 147
|
|
- Elijah Green
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2016 NSF CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop March 21-22, 2016 St Louis, MO Post Workshop Evaluation - Initial Report 1. How do you feel about what you have learned from this workshop? # Answer Response % 1 Very unsatisfactory 0 0% 2 1 1% 3 2 1% % 5 Very satisfactory % Total % Statistic Value Min Value 2 Max Value 5 Mean 4.76 Variance 0.25 Standard Deviation 0.50 Total Responses Will you recommend this workshop to other future CAREER proposal submitters? # Answer Response % 1 Definitely no 0 0% 2 1 1% 3 2 1% % 5 Definitely yes % Total % Statistic Value Min Value 2 Max Value 5 Mean 4.86 Variance 0.19 Standard Deviation 0.43 Total Responses What is your overall rating for this workshop? # Answer Response % 1 Poor 0 0% 2 1 1% 3 2 1% % 5 Excellent % Total %
2 Statistic Value Min Value 2 Max Value 5 Mean 4.71 Variance 0.30 Standard Deviation 0.54 Total Responses 147
3 Number of votes Number of votes 2. Will you recommend this workshop to other future CAREER proposal submitters? Definitely no < > Definitely yes 3. What is your overall rating for this workshop? Poor < > Excellent
4 4. What activities in the workshop are the most helpful? Text Responses Expert and peer review of project summaries Mock panel review; summary review with group The breakout session discussing our project summaries Mock panel review; hearing from NSF PD. The panel review experience. (Day1); The summary review with panel (Day 2). In general it is a very good workshop. All sessions. Panel reviews specific to CAREER proposal are great; NSF director presentation about CAREER is also very helpful. George's lecture. George's talk. Breakout sessions; replication of panel evals. Review of our summary in group and the initial presentation. Also the conversations with NSF PMs. Mock proposals. Presentations of recent CAREER awardees; Mock reviews; Reading our summaries and getting feedback from moderator. Discussion of the summary. The presentations; The mock proposals review panels; Presentation by recent CAREER awardee. PD's presentation and mock review. George s presentation; Mock proposals; summary peer review feedback. Reading proposals and discussing with PM. Awardees' presentation; George's presentation on what CAREER is; Presentations of CAREER proposal tips at the beginning; review project summary within each panel. Editing my proposal and critiquing was supper useful. Mock panel reviews of the proposals. Talking to program directors informally. All activities were helpful. Talks by NSF directors. Mock panel reviews. All are helpful! Panel reviews; Interacting with PDs; Presentations by NSF PD and CAREER proposal awardees. Talks given by NSF directors. Mock panel discussion of my project summary. George's presentation on key points; Mock panel reviewers; Homework, feedback on project summary. George's presentation thought I also find it very helpful to hear perspectives from the PM who facilitated our panel review; Proposal summary critique. Mock review panels, advices from awardees, and exposure to NSF PMS were very helpful. George's presentation, chatting with PDs. Breakout sessions and individual discussions George's presentation. The panel work was helpful, but none of us had any knowledge of the research area of the others on the panel.
5 Mock panel. Discussions of summary statements. George's presentation. CAREER awardee presentations. George's presentation, panel review and comparing and listening other thoughts from different background and expertise. The strategy of having a life (research) plan before starting thinking about a CAREER proposal. Discussion of a recommended and very direct approves to.that this is a "career" proposal not a research proposal. Mock panels were also useful. George's presentation Review by colleagues of proposal summary and also feedback from program officers on the same. Giving feedback for my summary and discussing the summary of other folks in the group. Discussing previous proposals. Panel discussion on the proposal review and summary review. George's presentation Revision of modified project summaries from each participant in the panel. George's presentation, Mock panel, talks by prior career awardees. The panel review process. Mock panel review and panel review of our own project summaries. Mock panel, homework and panel feedback about proposal summary. Mock panels, summary reviews. The presentation by Dr. Hazelrigg is very helpful to understand the procedure, dos, don'ts for NSF CAREER projects, the panel review is very helpful in understanding how the review process goes and how proposal is evaluated from different perspectives. Work in groups. Mock panel process and the presentation from funded PIs. George's presentation, NSF CAREER awardees presentation, Mock panel Panel George's presentation, mock panel review--> specifically getting 6 prior proposals to read. Review of panel's own proposal Review proposals and revise summary page. Successful NSF CAREER presentation. George's presentation Panel discussion Project summaries discussion, presentation by George, George's presentation. It redefined my understanding of a career award proposal. Proposal and project summaries reviews, Feedback session. The 1st session for NSF program General by George. Mock panel, review of other's summaries; their reviews of mine Morning 'top level' lecture. Mock panels. The panel review process of proposals and our project summary. The panel discussions, talking with PMs and George's presentation. The feedback on our revised projects summaries was very helpful. George's presentation, mock panel, direct feedback on project summary by attendees and PD. Mock panel reviews and panel discussion, George's presentation.
6 Defining objectives and hypothesis. Review of personal summary, mock panel review, George's presentation. George's presentation, specifically formulation. Mock review Reviewing proposals. Discussing project summaries George's presentation Panel Reviewing each other's proposals. Presentation of previous awardees. Interaction with program managers. I enjoyed all activities, as well as the way they were structured and their sequence. Grant writing presentation, panel review, summary editing. Mock panel workshop for reviewing grant. Presentation from NSF PD feedback session. Panel summary, mock-up reviews. Mock review and panel discussion of summary revision. Mock proposal review and panel discussions. All sessions Review panel and project summary review. The lecture from George was also remarkable! George's presentation. Discussion of summary Everything. Very useful and engaging workshop. Thank you! Mock panel Panels The first day presentation by George and panel mock review with Z.J. Pei. George's presentation. Panel discussion about previous proposals. George's presentation. Presentations by recent awardees, review revised projected summaries on Day 2. George's presentation. I learned a lot about CAREER specific proposal writing in comparison to the regular NSF proposals. All the sessions Peer review of my own project summary, reviewing other proposals before the workshop, then seeing how my review changes after the mock panel. Panel summaries; George's presentation; networking The panel with individual feedback and comments along with a program director and seeing the proposals in a new light following the great morning presentation. The mock panel review is very helpful. George's presentation is impressive and very informative. Reviewing abstract from CAREER proposals. The mock panel Most helpful: discussion and feedback on our own project summaries. Mock proposal review George's presentation. Mock panel review. Panel discussion on revised project summary. Reading other proposals. George's presentation. Mock panel and revision of individual own summaries
7 Career Awardees' presentation; George's presentation; Project summary session. The Monday morning presentation was the most helpful to me. All activities were helpful. Project summary review and presentation George's presentation. Getting the chance to read proposals from outside my field had a significant impact on how to write my proposal. Lecture from George is extremely helpful. Panel review of proposals is also informative. Feedback on my own project summary is beneficial. George's presentation. Previous NSF CAREER awardees' presentations. The interactive panel discussions about previous proposals. The presentation of the past awardees. The discussion on the proposals. George's presentation. The mock review of past proposals was the best. George's presentation. Mock review panel. Mock panel In the order of helpfulness. 1. George's presentation. 2. Review of mock proposals. 3. review of own project summaries. 4. Presentation for previous career awardees. George's presentation. The panels were very helpful. Two recent CAREER awardees presentation. NSF program director NSF CAREER proposal guideline presentation. Everything was very good. If there was a way to pair about the young faculty with a PM they want to talk to during lunch or dinner would be helpful. Review and comments on revised summary. Presentation on general aspect of CAREER grant. I think it was a good balance of presentations, working together on the mock proposal panels and discussing project summaries. Having a smaller group panel and one on one time was very helpful. The mock panel was the best by far. Review of our own summary is very good and helpful. Meeting new people outside my area was a good bonus. Panel activities and discussions. In the order of usefulness. 1. Break panel sessions! 2. Working meals. 3. Stories from previous winners. 4. George talking for 3 hours. NSF CAREER proposal guideline presentation More review and presentation Mock panel reviews The panel summary discussions were very helpful. Review professor/ panel discussion I felt like George's presentation was very helpful to me. The mock panel was great as well. Presentations and mock panel Review of previous proposal and reworking you own project summary. Panel review, overview presentation on guidelines.
8 The mock panel review was the most useful to me. Similarly, the discussion on proposal summary was excellent. I really liked the additional comments/insights make by the PD (George) time to time on the proposal summary. George's presentation interactions with PD, networking with colleagues. Honestly all of it. This is one of the only workshop I've attend where everything was useful. The timeline was also good. Panel reviews. George's presentation. Presentation by CAREER recipients one just being able to interact with NSF personnel. The Panel review activities. The presentation. In fact, everything was perfect! Face to face access with PD and NSF officials is by far the most valuable. George's presentations are phenomenal but could also be video-taped and pre-screened by attendees. The feedback session (review/edits on our career summaries) was extremely helpful! The discussion sections was very helpful. The feedback from the peer helped me a lot to understand how to write a good proposal what to expect from the reviewers. Mock panels and comments on the revised project summaries. Presentations regarding writing a successful CAREER proposal. Seeing the successful and unsuccessful proposals. The presentation by George. The revised summary discussion. The mock panel. Statistic Value Total responses 147
9 5. What activities in the workshop are not helpful? Text Responses Mock panel was only guesswork based on previous lecture rather than real expertise. Not surprising results. Not interesting or insightful process. Non engineering seemed very out of place and different. Prospective from award winners The food was bad. The meals were tasteless and sparse. The first presentation was very specific and explicit a/b not using words like "design" and "develop". But these are words successful career awardees and words my NSF PD supports. Everything was helpful. The working dinner and lunch could be praised to insure actual interaction between program managers and directors and attendees. In the lunch P.M. were clustered and some attendees did not benefited from the potentials interactions. Not sure if I did get much from the two presenters that their proposals were reviewed for the conference. Awardee talks. The mock panel was less useful to me but I have served on two panels. It was very good, Time for lunch and breakfast was long. It could be better if the recent awardees or NSF members could be introduced in the front or had name tags with a different color so that it was easier to find during lunch or dinner. Also if they could talk about their programs that could be helpful. The irrelative proposals. Reviewing proposals way different from our expertise. Experience previous awardees. The presentations and Q&A from previous awardees. Mock review panels were difficult for me because the area was not close to mine at all. The mock panel was OK, but I think more time on critiquing would be better. Maybe less time on overview of NSF. Former CAREER winners All are helpful! The mock panel results are different from the real panel results. I wish we could know which mock proposals got awarded right before or right after the mock panel discussion. If the mock panel have 15 mins to discuss why they were awarded, I would have learnt more from the mock panel. All are helpful! George's presentation makes research seem prescribed. Would be good to hear other opinions. Base information could be shortened, such as submitting in time, font sizes, etc. The project summary panel was very informal and was helpful only because our facilitator was very knowledgeable. Talks by previous CAREER award recipients. It just repeated what are have already known. Hot breakfast please. I found the mock panels to be less useful to me personally as I have already served on a panel at NSF. It reinforced some of those lessons learned, however.
10 ... review of submitted proposals First 2 hours of going over GPG. Everything is very helpful. Mock review too many. 1-3 would be enough. All good. Individual experience are good but not necessarily helpful in that they cannot cover a wide range of scenarios because they are every specific with their own experience. I have no complaints. I didn't learn very much from the previous award winner talks, most was repeated. Panel reviews were not as smooth as could be. Many people not manufacturing. All are helpful! Panel and previous award winners' talk.. N/A Everything was helpful. Previous awardees. Welcome party Every activity has its purpose. Mock review for faculty in their final stage of their tenure-track position Presentation N/A The peer review of our summaries was helpful, but less so than the mock reviews. Maybe assign NSF staff to tables to avoid empty tables during meals. Nothing particular, but perhaps a more spacious hotel conferences room would be good. none They were all useful and interesting. I feel like the topics covered in presentation from past awardees was already covered extensively in previous presentations and mock proposal review. No
11 The work lunch does not seem to add much to the workshop. Could try to arrange tables and seats and define a theme for discussion over the lunch. Would be helpful to tell us to re-read all 6 proposal the night before for the mock review panel.. I understand why it is done this way, but the first day was very long. I only wanted some more time to "fix" my summary since I had lots of thinking on my part. (this is all still helpful) George's talk is great but it could be given as a podcast (youtube video) before the conference to give more time to other activities. Lengthy presentation on the structure of NSF and the GPG (also from George). I know this is important but it is covered at every single NSF workshop. N/A not really The food was a challenge. I requested gluten-free food but got sick after eating it. CAREER awardee. The speeches from past winners were good and reinforced concepts, but least essential. They are all good, Maybe not give homework after an intensive first day. N/A The presentations are a bit long, adding more hands on session and group discussions will be great., we could have worked on less proposals. I thought the panel discussions could have been a bit shorter to add a bit more formal presentations. N/A N/A N/A noted. The food section is too far from the discussion room! The presentations by previous CAREER recipients was very repetitive from the main presentation, but specific insights would be useful or additional comments on the process maybe more beneficial. Statistic Value Total responses 92
12 6. What activities would you suggest to be included in future workshops? Text Responses More interaction of project summary reviews writing workshop. Perhaps have more diverse set of NSF speakers rather than single multi hour lecture; Consider panel of program managers to get different insights; More interactive panels/discussion, proposal development. A panel discussion with program directors. One -on-one time with PDs. If there was a way to get technical feedback from someone in my area, it would help. Develop more program-specific activities (if possible). Reviewed proposals all belong to the same CMMI area (very manufacturing oriented), with more samples could be made available (e.g. parts of proposal) for discussion of particular strong points and covering broader set of CMMI programs. Direct discussion with relevant program managers. Maybe make the presenters (whose proposals were reviewed) present as a panel with other people whose proposals not also awarded w/ lots of questions from the floor. Additional review of participant career proposal; more on how to find core flows in proposals. A social aspect to encourage other participants to continue and submit their proposals after the workshop is over. Put the attends in the right group with the same background. I liked all the activates included. More space and more interactions with PDs. See official NSF awards/rejection with panel feedback. Breakout groups with people more closed related to your field. The panels are useful because you see how different areas review proposals but additions similar groups would also be nice. Some protein (eggs) items at breakfast. Select proposals more related to the attendee's fields, maybe more than six proposal samples that are the same for all attendees. More proposal editing, Maybe 2 rounds instead of one. Overnight homework should be moved to a day-time activity. Schedule begins too early. A little more time to work on project summaries. More recent awardees to present their stories. Examples of full proposals including budget, data manage plan, etc. Divide participants into panels based on fields. In the mock review, the moderator should be more involved. More carefully select attendees, those who did not submit a CAREER proposal should not be selected!! Longer panel review sessions and better/larger rooms for panel reviewers. Bigger rooms for presentation with tables and electric outlets. Longer sessions for review and feedback on attendees' project summaries. Separate and dedicated time that attendees can talk to the PDs. A full week workshop with focused exercise (writing) and developing project description also along with summaries. We ended up with extra time after my proposal summary critique. Though we moved through those really quickly. I benefited even more from having time to talk more with our
13 group's facilitator about general NSF structure, funding metis, and proposal tips. This somewhat formal bur organic interaction could be encouraged for the groups. Can't think of any Orient groups more towards research subjects. Smaller group activities, less lectures. Actual breakfast. Optional breakout sessions with each current and former NSF PD so that workshop attendees who will be submitting to those programs can meet with them and have a Q&A session. Would be very helpful and perhaps decrease how much NSF folks are mobbed during breaks. Having PDs from various programs. If at all possible it would be nice to have more time to revise summaries before discussion with the mock panels. It would be better if the mock proposals could be grouped into specific expertise of participants. I would like to see the process of a winning proposal being developed and see the transition between an unfunded draft and a funded draft and a later submission. Can you organize the group such that the mentor from the NSF has overlap with most of the members? I think it s really help. Invite the latest CAREER awardees from other divisions, e.g. DMR. It may be helpful to know a little more about why proposals 3,4,5,6 were not funded that would be a good learning experience. More opp for networking w/ participants. More PDs. More info/advice on education section. Attendees should be required to submit a document or figure that outlines their 5, 10, 15 year CAREER plans. Including: big idea, research objectives. more structured interaction time with PM... PM introduce their perspectives? One or two presentations by PD. More awarded proposals. Fitting attendees with collaborators, people in the same area in several panels. Bring more people from past NSF CAREER received. More people from other field. More panel discussions! More CAREER panels with actual awardees. More time is required to spend with actual CAREER awardees. More interaction for people in the same field. More time for project summaries review. 1 more feedback session would be helpful after the 1st feedback. Could there be some discussion of differences in institution type? R1 vs PUI vs others and how to convince people that research can be done effectively at a non-r1. Newer proposals. Can we see actual panel comments from the example proposals? Individual/group meeting with respective PDs.
14 see actual reviews from panels for a proposal we reviewed. One meal could arrange tables by research area to help us network with one another. More awardee presentations. More emphasis on integrating research and education. Provide references in mock panel review. I would have liked to meet one-on-one or one on small group (i.e. pane; review) with the PM's I am submitting to. Share some good project summaries. Share some good hypothesis statements or research objectives. More time to revise the project summaries. Maybe a 2 draft review and revise opportunity. More directors talking about the programs Should include PD from all field. Have a chance to interact with PD in your field. Interactive communications and/or Q/A between PDs and attendees. Hope it could be a little longer and provide a follow-up session before the submission of CAREER proposals. Share specific literature and references. Same again. Maybe roaring panel chairs or one chair in the first day and another in the second day. Breakout with specific PM to describe expectations within each program followed up with Q&A. More guidance in the panel reviews [a final comment form the moderator] [some comments on proposals are not relevant but hard to tell].. Great, efficient program. I have learned a lot. I wish other directors ran program like this one! The proposals selected were somewhat narrow. Proposals from the MME/MEP programs were selected. Some proposals from the SMOR program would help! The writing exercise and feedback was good -- maybe forcing a bit more reflection on what we learned as a function of the workshop (minor point) Maybe a fun activity in the local area. More focused proposal review for individuals. more focused group when organizing panels, e.g. a panel group with an civil engineering domain, etc. Have a "meeting PD" session for one hour or so. Select six proposal from different disciplines (computing, materials, etc) A short presentation on background of how NSF work. Use proposals of participants for the mock panels, then we could obtain more feedback. sessions with specific PM. Mock proposal review and presentation. Keep doing the good work. Budget planning details. Could it be beneficial to split the discussions into individual programs for more specific Q&A
15 More presentations by past awardees. Presentation by PD explaining their programs. In this case, faculty can attend their desired session and group more information about their desired/targeted programs. Networking opportunity for people in similar field. The workshop already seems well optimized for the time available. Make it a 2 day activity and add activities. Maybe wide range of mock proposals. Career awardees presentation. NSF Career proposal guideline presentation. Mock panels. See above.. Providing photos of PD and other session leaders? It can be hard to find specific people during breaks. I would make the due date closer to the workshop so that the proposals are more "recent" in my mind. I needed to catch up on these while in the mock panel. More networking time. Actually good proposals to review from recent years, not 10 years ago. Note: the confidentiality of the identity of proposers that we read was weakened as you could delete the black highlights in most of the PDFs. More breakout session. More discussions on how to pick a research topic, maybe breakout sessions on this? More PDs from other divisions e.g. DMS. More examples on the guidelines. It would be great if we can see some real comments for the proposals for mock review. Formal Q&A session between a program director and participants. Proposal summary discussion could be longer. More speakers who are former CAREER award winners. Expose more opportunity of interacting with current and past program director. It may be good to discuss overlap and how to navigate. Open solicitations us CAREER which to choose when to submit each how to differentiate. A panel of PD from NSF for Q&A. come to mind. Workshop components were all helpful. Having program mangers present was a great way to connect. It would be great to take minutes to have all attending PMs and PDs introduce themselves in front of the group, the room format make it difficult to see people from across the room. More group discussion. It would be great to set up the panels according to expertise to have more interaction with the PM that will review your proposal. If there is an opportunity to schedule time with PMs that would helpful. However, this is not necessary because I did reach out to a PD directly and received valuable feedback. Perhaps a second panel review as the first was very helpful. More time to talk to program directors. Some of them were not present. Do at least two passes on summary reviews. Give attendees a chance to incorporate feedback into summary before a 2nd review. Send a video of George's talk out and require that attendees review it before submitting their first draft or a revision of it once accepted into the workshop.
16 Maybe getting feedback from the peers on the fail draft CAREER proposal. It should not be perfect, but at least, the comments would be very helpful to some who has never submitted a CAREER proposal before. Have specific table assignments to ensure panelists have a program director to talk to during lunch and dinners sessions (maybe based on the area they are submitting to) I would suggest including a presentation from different PMs so that we may get different opinions about what is acceptable and what is not. Thank you for a great workshop! Statistic Value Total responses 119
Checklist for TC local hosts
Checklist for TC local hosts The FIRST community is member driven, and we appreciate members that would like to contribute. Thank you for considering hosting a TC! TCs are very important part of the CSIRT
More information2018 BFWW Questions. If so what kind of support letter do I have to get from the Department Chair (i.e., he will be promoted to Assistant Professor).
2018 BFWW Questions Topic Question/Answer Campus Questions from the January 10 th Pre-Submission Webinar Q: Are faculty at the Instructor level-eligible to apply? Unknown If so what kind of support letter
More informationGuide to Membership. Getting Started. What is the Public Relations Division of AEJMC?
Guide to Membership Getting Started What is the Public Relations Division of AEJMC? AEJMC s Public Relations Division is the largest organization of public relations educators in the world. Its 500+ members
More informationProposal Writing Workshop
National Science Foundation Proposal Writing Workshop Celeste Carter Thomas Higgins Program Officers Education and Human Resources Directorate (EHR) Workshop Outline Merit Review Criteria Review Intellectual
More informationStrengths and weaknesses of CAREER Proposals
Strengths and weaknesses of CAREER Proposals Parag R. Chitnis Deputy Division Director Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Directorate for Biological Sciences Why? Why? Interest in education
More information2014 Cambridge English Language Assessment awards for preparation centre FAQ
2014 Cambridge English Language Assessment awards for preparation centre FAQ We understand that you and your preparation centres may have lots of questions about the awards. That is why we have put together
More informationAmerican Chemical Society. Role of Program Chair: Review of Duties/Timeline
American Chemical Society Role of Program Chair: Review of Duties/Timeline Topics for Discussion Who is Involved in a National Meeting Program Core Responsibilities Top 10 Tips for a Successful National
More informationLCLD Success in Law School Mentoring Program. Group Mentoring Program Planning Guide: Everything You Need to Know to Plan a Successful Event
LCLD Success in Law School Mentoring Program Group Mentoring Program Planning Guide: Everything You Need to Know to Plan a Successful Event The Group Mentoring Program (GMP) is an important part of the
More informationHow to Write a Winning Proposal
How to Write a Winning Proposal NSF Northeast Student Workshop in Control Engineering April 23-25, 2010 Rajinder P. Khosla Program Director National Science Foundation What makes a Winning Proposal? 1.
More informationInside a National Science Foundation (NSF) Review Panel
Inside a National Science Foundation (NSF) Review Panel Marc Rigas & Elizabeth Rockey Seidle Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Office (SIRO) Penn State University University Park, PA 16802 USA Penn
More informationToday s webinar is intended to provide an overview and program orientation, and to highlight two significant changes to this year s RFP.
Welcome! Thank you for joining us this morning! I m really pleased to be joined this morning by Carey Hatch, our Associate Provost from SUNY, who has been leading the Open SUNY initiatives, including the
More informationDemystifying the Funding Process at the National Science Foundation
Laura Stanley, Ph.D., CPE Associate Professor IMSE Graduate Program Coordinator Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Department Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana Director Human Factors Engineering
More informationCOLLABORATE 2017 September 24-27, 2017 Turnberry Isle Resort & Spa Miami, FL
sponsorship opportunities September 24-27, 2017 Turnberry Isle Resort & Spa Miami, FL Diamond hy is sponsoring the SCTEM Conference valuable for a supplier partner? SCTEM s annual conference is an intimate
More informationDO S AND DON TS IN OBTAINING FUNDING FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH
DO S AND DON TS IN OBTAINING FUNDING FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH Prepared by Jean-Louis Briaud (briaud@tamu.edu) With contributions from the USUCGER Board Ahmed Elgamal Deborah Goodings, President
More informationRecruitment and Diversity Guide for Partners
Recruitment and Diversity Guide for Partners At Creative Capital, we believe that striving for greater diversity is one of the hallmarks of leadership in artist service organizations. Creative Capital
More informationSPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITY. GrrCON October 26 & 27, 2017 DeVos Place, Grand Rapids, MI. Cyber Security Summit & Hacker Conference
SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITY GrrCON 2017 Cyber Security Summit & Hacker Conference October 26 & 27, 2017 DeVos Place, Grand Rapids, MI Sponsorship at GrrCON gives you access to a huge number of potential customers
More informationPROPOSAL WRITING: 10 Helpful Hints and Fatal Flaws
PROPOSAL WRITING: 10 Helpful Hints and Fatal Flaws From National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education, Directorate for Education and Human Resources Adapted by the SUNY Oneonta Grants
More informationM B S E. Opportunities in Manufacturing at NSF
1 M B S E Model-Based Systems Engineering Center Opportunities in Manufacturing at NSF Chris Paredis Georgia Institute of Technology George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering H. Milton Stewart
More informationChicago. Tampa. Achieving Accreditation. June March Achieving Accreditation Schedule
Friday We ve been at this for 35 years teaching and learning in service of excellent care for patients in ambulatory settings. At Achieving Accreditation, we share the intent of the Standards; during on-site
More informationSTEM Learning and Research (STELAR) Education Development Center. Writing Successful NSF Annual Reports Thursday, April 21, 2016
STEM Learning and Research (STELAR) Center @ Education Development Center Writing Successful NSF Annual Reports Thursday, April 21, 2016 Agenda STELAR Introduction Annual Report Overview Q & A The Specifics
More informationSomerset Care Community (Taunton Deane)
Somerset Care Limited Somerset Care Community (Taunton Deane) Inspection report Huish House Huish Close Taunton Somerset TA1 2EP Tel: 01823447120 Date of inspection visit: 11 January 2016 12 January 2016
More informationProposer Guide for Summer Fellowships
Proposer Guide for Summer Fellowships I. Introduction The Summer Fellowships are designed to support the scholarly activities of ETSU undergraduate students. Proposals for these grants are solicited once
More informationCertification Body Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017 Summary Report
Certification Body Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017 Summary Report Introduction During February and March 2017, the Federation ran two online Customer Satisfaction surveys, one for each of their key customers.
More informationFordingbridge. Hearts At Home Care Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Requires Improvement
Hearts At Home Care Limited Fordingbridge Inspection report 54 Avon Meade Fordingbridge Hampshire SP6 1QR Tel: 01425657329 Website: www.heartsathomecare.co.uk Date of inspection visit: 25 July 2017 26
More informationA1 Home Care. A1 Home Care Ltd. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good
A1 Home Care Ltd A1 Home Care Inspection report Units 16-19 Robjohns House, Navigation Road Chelmsford Essex CM2 6ND Date of inspection visit: 06 April 2017 Date of publication: 08 June 2017 Tel: 01245354774
More informationLiberal Democrat Spring Conference Training Guide. Published and promoted by Liberal Democrats, 8-10 Great George Street, London, SW1P 3AE.
Liberal Democrat Spring Conference 2018 Training Guide Published and promoted by Liberal Democrats, 8-10 Great George Street, London, SW1P 3AE. Looking for one-to-one help, advice or support at Conference?
More informationA Day In the Life of A GP..
On radio 4 s Today Programme, John Humphreys remarked to a GP he was interviewing : You re not seriously telling me that GPs work at 8.30 am and don t leave till 6.30pm. If you did, quite frankly I would
More informationGlobal Fund External Review Report
Global Fund External Review Report Overview The Global Fund was established in November 21 to foster global citizenship through the pillars of International Engagement and Intercultural Understanding in
More informationPreparing for Proposal Writing
Preparing for Proposal Writing Beverly K. Berger Physics Division National Science Foundation bberger@nsf.gov General advice (any agency, any program) Proposals to NSF NSF website demo Part of this presentation
More informationSociety for Research in Child Development
Society for Research in Child Development 2016 Special Topic Meeting: Babies, Boys and Men of Color Organizers: Diane Hughes, New York University Oscar Barbarin, University of Maryland, College Park Velma
More informationNURS 6051: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Information Technology Electronic Health Records Program Transcript
NURS 6051: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Information Technology Electronic Health Records Program Transcript [MUSIC PLAYING] NARRATOR: Because patient data, research evidence, and best practices
More informationThe Social and Academic Experience of Male St. Olaf Hockey Players
Kirsten Paulson and co-author Baxter and Paulson 1 Chris Chiappari Ethnographic Research Methods 373 May 10, 2005 The Social and Academic Experience of Male St. Olaf Hockey Players The setting St. Olaf
More informationUpdate on Solar System Workings 2014
Update on Solar System Workings 2014 Outer Planet Assessment Group SSW Caucus: Mary Voytek Jared Leisner Mitch Schulte Sarah Noble NASA Ames February 19, 2015 New for 2015 SOLAR SYSTEM WORKINGS SSW requires
More informationSouthern California NIOSH Education and Research Center (SCERC): Guidelines for Pilot Project Research Training Program Grant Applicants (FY 2017/18)
Southern California NIOSH Education and Research Center (SCERC): Guidelines for Pilot Project Research Training Program Grant Applicants (FY 2017/18) A. Purpose The main objectives of this program are
More informationStaff Awards 2017 proposal
1. Review of Staff Awards 2016 Staff Awards 2017 proposal Overview of the process The ULHT Staff Awards 2016 were launched in June 2015 and nominations were open until Friday 15 January 2016. In that time,
More informationOBSTETRICS GYN. Class Year: 2012 Clerkship Rotation Evaluation Results SI. Site: Mercy General. Service: Caseload and Management of Patients
Class Year: 0 Clerkship Rotation Evaluation Results SI Caseload and Management of Patients In general, there was an appropriately diverse mix of patients (including race and ethnicity) seen on this service
More informationFaculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program. Program Solicitation NSF
Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Program Solicitation NSF 15-555 William Badecker, Ph.D. Program Director, SBE/BCS/Linguistics Member of the CAREER Coordinating Committee Support for New
More information2012 GRANT WRITING INSTITUTE Developing NIH Grant Proposals
University of Tennessee/Knoxville 2012 GRANT WRITING INSTITUTE Developing NIH Grant Proposals Program Description Application Forms Faculty Participants Mentors Graduate Fellows Sponsored by: UTK Office
More informationASPiRE INTERNAL GRANT PROGRAM JUNIOR FACULTY RESEARCH COMPETITION Information, Guidelines, and Grant Proposal Components (updated Summer 2018)
ASPiRE INTERNAL GRANT PROGRAM JUNIOR FACULTY RESEARCH COMPETITION Information, Guidelines, and Grant Proposal Components (updated Summer 2018) INTRODUCTION Ball State University's Internal Grants Program
More informationPreparing for the Jewish Job Fair
Preparing for the Jewish Job Fair YU s annual Jewish Job Fair will be held on TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, from 6-9 pm in the Gym on the Wilf Campus of Yeshiva University. It is open to all job seekers looking
More informationHARTLEPOOL HOME CARE SURVEY SERVICE USER/CARER QUESTIONNAIRE Summary Sheet
HARTLEPOOL HOME CARE SURVEY SERVICE USER/CARER QUESTIONNAIRE Summary Sheet Are you? Male 43 Female 115 How old are you? < 40 2 40 49 2 50 59 7 60 69 10 70 79 37 80 89 65 90 + 31 1) How is your home care
More informationTallahassee Supplier Diversity Exchange
Final Report The Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD) presented the 2017 Tallahassee Supplier Diversity Exchange on Wednesday, October 4 in collaboration with the Big Bend Minority Enterprise Development
More informationA: Yes, joint funded packages are possible. There needs to be a process for the NHS to calculate its contribution
Questions Asked by Attendee Q: Can budgets be shared with LA if patient has considerable social care needs? A: Yes, joint funded packages are possible. There needs to be a process for the NHS to calculate
More informationHospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program HCAHPS and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Questions & Answers Moderator: Bethany Wheeler, BS Hospital VBP Program Support Contract Lead,
More informationInnovation Awards Program. This document is the nomination package explaining the award, its venue, rules and process.
Innovation Awards Program This document is the nomination package explaining the award, its venue, rules and process. 1 Key Dates Call for Entries to ASC: October 30, 2017 Closing DateforAward Submittals
More informationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO RESEARCH ALLOCATIONS COMMITTEE (RAC) GUIDELINES FOR GRANTS
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO RESEARCH ALLOCATIONS COMMITTEE (RAC) GUIDELINES FOR GRANTS A. OVERVIEW The primary mission of the Research Allocations Committee (RAC) funding is to support the career development
More informationAyurveda and the Evolution of Modern Medicine. The 2017 theme is:
CALL FOR RESEARCH POSTER ABSTRACTS 2017 NAMA Conference April 21-23, 2017 Doubletree Hotel Oak Brook Oak Brook, IL (Chicago Airports Midway MDW & O Hare ORD) conducted by the Research Poster Selection
More information2016 MEMBER SURVEY SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
2016 MEMBER SURVEY SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Introduction Traditionally each year ONS conducts a survey of its membership to assess their overall level of satisfaction with their membership and engagement with
More informationMelanoma Research Foundation 2016 Medical Student Research Grant Application Instructions
2016 Medical Student Research Grant Application Instructions Purpose: To provide opportunities and funding for medical students to engage in short clinical or laboratory-based research projects focused
More informationSpace Apps Pre-Event Meetup Planning Guide
Space Apps Pre-Event Meetup Planning Guide Purpose of this planning guide This planning guide provides information for those who are interested in hosting an optional Space Apps Pre-Event Meetup or Data
More informationWriting a Successful Postdoctoral Fellowship Proposal Marjorie S. Zatz, Vice Provost & Graduate Dean August 21, 2018
Writing a Successful Postdoctoral Fellowship Proposal Marjorie S. Zatz, Vice Provost & Graduate Dean August 21, 2018 Nuts and bolts Research and fellowship funding programs are highly competitive. Start
More informationMinistry of Health Patients as Partners Provincial Dialogue Report
Ministry of Health Patients as Partners 2017 Provincial Dialogue Report Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction 6 Balanced Participation: Demographics and Representation at the Dialogue 8 Engagement
More information172 responses. Summary. How do you hear about GSA Events? What attracts you to GSA Events? Edit this form. Publish analytics
weglinski@brandeis.edu 172 responses Edit this form Publish analytics Summary How do you hear about GSA Events? Brandeis Em GSA Facebook Flyers and M Word of Mouth I have not h 0 35 70 105 140 Brandeis
More informationWinning Words: Sales Scripting for Home Care Agencies. Caring.com Digital Marketing Academy August 9, 2018
Winning Words: Sales Scripting for Home Care Agencies Caring.com Digital Marketing Academy August 9, 2018 Welcome This presentation will be available within a few business days. This is a one-way webcast.
More informationCall for Scientific Session Proposals
Call for Scientific Session Proposals 2017 Theme: Serving Society Through Science Policy To make decisions, societies rely on knowledge and multiple perspectives. Policies both within and outside science
More informationNSF MME Program and Other Funding Opportunities for Manufacturing Faculty
NSF MME Program and Other Funding Opportunities for Manufacturing Faculty Zhijian (ZJ) Pei Program Director Manufacturing Machines and Equipment National Science Foundation January 10, 2014 Thanks go to
More informationWriting a Successful Grant Proposal
Purdue Extension EC-737 Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Maria I. Marshall Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University Aaron Johnson Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Oregon
More informationResident Remediation
Resident Remediation Sarah A. Stahmer MD Residency Program Director Cooper University Hospital I. Rules of the Road What are your performance goals? How are you going to determine if they achieve these
More informationWhite Paper BKLYN Incubator
Administrative Information Brooklyn Public Library: BKLYN Incubator Amount Awarded: $25,000 Total Project Cost: $78,653 Project Dates: November 1, 2015 October 31, 2016 Project Administrators: BKLYN Incubator
More informationCaremark Watford & Hertsmere
S V Care Limited Caremark Watford & Hertsmere Inspection report 95 St Albans Road Watford Hertfordshire WD17 1SJ Tel: 01923729898 Date of inspection visit: 17 October 2017 30 October 2017 31 October 2017
More informationNavigating the NSF CAREER Award (in CSR)
Navigating the NSF CAREER Award (in CSR) Randal Burns Professor and Chair Dept. of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University Presentation to the: 2018 NSF Workshop for Aspiring Principal Investigators
More informationSociety for Research in Child Development 2015 Biennial Meeting March 19 21, 2015 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Society for Research in Child Development 2015 Biennial Meeting March 19 21, 2015 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Call for Submissions The Governing Council and Program Committee of the Society for Research
More informationWeber State University. Master of Science in Nursing Program. Master s Project Handbook
Weber State University Master of Science in Nursing Program Master s Project Handbook Page 1 of 24 Table of Contents Introduction to the Master s Project... 5 Master s Project Development Process... 6
More informationMartin Nesbitt Tape 36. Q: You ve been NCNA s legislator of the year 3 times?
Martin Nesbitt Tape 36 Q: You ve been NCNA s legislator of the year 3 times? A: Well, it kinda fell upon me. I was named the chair of the study commission back in the 80s when we had the first nursing
More informationWriting a Supercomputer Proposal for the National Science Foundation's Major Research Instrumentation Solicitation
Clemson University TigerPrints Presentations School of Computing 10-2009 Writing a Supercomputer Proposal for the National Science Foundation's Major Research Instrumentation Solicitation Amy Apon Clemson
More informationUNDERGRADUATE NURSING STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF A SUPERVISED SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING LABORATORY: A STRATEGY TO ENHANCE WORKPLACE READINESS
UNDERGRADUATE NURSING STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF A SUPERVISED SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING LABORATORY: A STRATEGY TO ENHANCE WORKPLACE READINESS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Debra Kerr, Associate Professor, Deakin
More informationThe Boltons. Mr & Mrs V Juggurnauth. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good
Mr & Mrs V Juggurnauth The Boltons Inspection report 4 College Road Reading Berkshire RG6 1QD Tel: 01189261712 Date of inspection visit: 17 March 2016 Date of publication: 08 April 2016 Ratings Overall
More informationSEIRI SEED Grant (SSG) 2018 Request for Proposals
SEIRI SEED Grant (SSG) 2018 Request for Proposals Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to seiri@iupui.edu or 317-278-0168. 2018 STEM Education Innovation & Research Institute Seed Grants Request
More informationINITIATION GRANT PROGRAM
Cleon C. Arrington RESEARCH INITIATION GRANT PROGRAM University Research Services & Administration Application Submission Deadline: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 PURPOSE & GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT AWARD
More informationWe are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.
Inspection Report We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Helping Hand Care Company Ltd Office 5, 23-25 Worthington Street,
More informationNational Science Foundation NSF 101
NSF 101 Part I: I have a research idea. Where can I get funding to support the project? Kevin Moeller Doing Science vs. Science Funding Yea! Boo! NSF is One of Many Federal Science Funding Agencies NSF
More informationMathematics/Statistics NSF GRFP Seminar Information Session
Information Session Purdue University Department of Mathematics October 1, 2015 Abstract The National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) is perhaps this most prestigious
More informationStory Street Walk-in Service
Story Street Walk-in Service Service User Engagement www.hullccg.nhs.uk NHSHullCCG @NHSHullCCG Page 2 Story Street Walk-in Service Service User Engagement Introduction The Walk-in Service is based in the
More informationArnold Palmer Hospital
Arnold Palmer Hospital Operations Management Michael Wynkoop 5/26/2013 Table of Contents SUMMARY OF FINDINGS... 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION... 2 PROBLEM STATEMENT... 2 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES... 3 DETAILED
More informationRFP for CHSS 2018 Faculty Summer Research Grant Program
The College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHSS) Faculty Summer Research Grant Program provides up to a $6,000 summer stipend to support traditional and applied research projects and creative activity
More information2018 Housing Conference SPONSOR & EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS
August 21, 2018 August 22, 2018 2018 Housing Conference SPONSOR & EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS WHO WE ARE The mission of the Oklahoma Coalition for Affordable Housing ( Coalition ) is to lead the movement to ensure
More information2018 Housing Conference SPONSOR & EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS
August 21, 2018 August 22, 2018 2018 Housing Conference SPONSOR & EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS WHO WE ARE The mission of the Oklahoma Coalition for Affordable Housing ( Coalition ) is to lead the movement to ensure
More informationTOP 10 IDEAS TO INVOLVE ALL STAFF IN ADVANCING EXCELLENCE
TOP 10 IDEAS TO INVOLVE ALL STAFF IN ADVANCING EXCELLENCE Advancing Excellence Long-Term Care Collaborative (AELTCC) is a not-for-profit organization made up of over 30 national stakeholders involved with
More informationNSF Faculty Early-Career Development Program
NSF Faculty Early-Career Development Program FALL 2017 JACKIE STEIN & STEVE LANDOWNE, ODU OFFICE OF RESEARCH Position Yourself for CAREER Success About the CAREER Program: goals and funding statistics
More informationThe National Science Foundation. Kam K. Leang Associate Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering
The National Science Foundation Kam K. Leang Associate Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering Outline Organization of National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorates, divisions, and programs (applying
More informationHOW TO CONDUCT GRANT SPRINTS
HOW TO CONDUCT GRANT SPRINTS A more collaborative, efficient, and fun way to write proposals HOW TO CONDUCT GRANT SPRINTS A more collaborative, efficient, and fun way to write proposals The Grant Sprint
More informationFaculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Proposal Writing Webinar Monday, April 17, 2017
Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Proposal Writing Webinar Monday, April 17, 2017 Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET) Directorate for Engineering
More informationNIH Grant Application: 101. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
NIH Grant Application: 101 National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Why Is Good Grant Writing So Important? Reviewers are very busy people Committees review many grants Reviewers have
More informationMathematics/Statistics NSF GRFP Seminar Writing Studio
Writing Studio Purdue University Department of Mathematics October 15, 2015 Abstract The National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) is perhaps this most prestigious graduate
More informationCONNECT. COMMUNICATE. COLLABORATE.
CONNECT. COMMUNICATE. COLLABORATE. 44 TH ANNUAL Conference & Trade Show Delegate Registration October 27-30, 2018 KANSAS CITY MARRIOTT DOWNTOWN KANSAS CITY, MO #naptconference naptconference.org info@napt.org
More informationContents. Your Steps to Entry FAQs The COGS Awards 2018: Terms and Conditions Need a Hand? Key Dates
2 Contents Key Dates Welcome Entry Fees The COGS Awards Categories How to Enter Judging Judge s Tips What Makes a Winning Entry? Your Steps to Entry FAQs The COGS Awards 2018: Terms and Conditions Need
More informationCall for Symposium Proposals
Call for Symposium Proposals 2016 Theme: Global Science Engagement Science is a global endeavor that advances when knowledge is both generated and shared. Increasingly, scientists and engineers are working
More informationVIC Delegate Information Package. Conference Details. An Invitation to Alberta Visitor Information Providers (AVIPs)
Conference Details What 2018 Spring Training & Showcase When Tuesday, May 8 to Wednesday, May 9, 2018 Where Delta Edmonton South Hotel and Conference Centre 4404 Gateway Boulevard Edmonton, AB T6H 5C2
More informationPatient Experience Feedback Renal Medicine - Dialysis
Patient Experience Feedback Renal Medicine - Dialysis Overall there was a very positive experience from all those surveyed Some very strong common themes ran throughout all respondents (see below), with
More informationUser perceptions of the implementation of an electronic medication management system (emms) in a paediatric setting
User perceptions of the implementation of an electronic medication management system (emms) in a paediatric setting Rae-Anne Hardie a, Melissa T Baysari a,b, Rebecca Lake a, Lauren Richardson a, Cheryl
More informationMonthly Meetings (Be Heard Professional Development Series) Work Plan
A. GENERAL IABC / Atlanta s professional development programs and our awards program have been designed to elevate the Atlanta business community to world-class communications status by providing practical
More informationAccess this presentation at:
Kevin Dressler, PhD, Associate Director of Strategic Initiatives & Proposal Development Office of the VP for Research: Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Office kxd13@psu.edu; 814-863-0050 103 Beecher-Dock
More informationSEI St. Louis Chapter Structural Engineering Scholarship
Thank you for your interest in the SEI-St. Louis Chapter Structural Engineering Scholarship. The scholarship committee has prepared the following summary to provide you some background. Please review the
More information2019 APNA National Conference
2019 APNA National Conference Adelaide Convention Centre, 4 6 April SPONSORSHIP PROSPECTUS Come and join us in Adelaide for our 2019 National Conference APNA is the peak professional body for primary health
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS THE ROSE HILLS FOUNDATION INNOVATOR GRANT PROGRAM RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS THE ROSE HILLS FOUNDATION INNOVATOR GRANT PROGRAM RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION APPLICATION DEADLINE: 12:00 pm., Monday, January 9, 2017 PURPOSE The Rose Hills Foundation is a legacy
More informationGraduation Ceremony Survey, May 2002
Palm Beach Community College 4200 Congress Avenue Lake Worth, Florida 33461 Graduation Ceremony Survey, May 2002 September 30, 2002 Academic Affairs: Sharon A. Sass, Ph.D., Vice President Office of Institutional
More informationJane Z. Dumsha, Ph.D., CHES Chief Research Operations Officer PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
Jane Z. Dumsha, Ph.D., CHES Chief Research Operations Officer 1. Develop an Idea 2. Find Potential Sponsors 3. Plan the Proposal 4. Draft the Proposal 5. Complete and Submit the Proposal What is the need?
More informationPlan of Attack. Ambulatory Care and Education 3/19/2014. X+Y Scheduling Models for Residency Training Programs
Plan of Attack X+Y Scheduling Models for Residency Training Programs Marc Shalaby, MD FACP Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania University at Buffalo Department of Pediatrics-Grand
More informationKestrel House. A S Care Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good
A S Care Limited Kestrel House Inspection report Kestrel House 14-16 Lower Brunswick Street Leeds West Yorkshire LS2 7PU Tel: 01132428822 Website: www.carewatch.co.uk Date of inspection visit: 31 May 2016
More informationMENTOR BRIEFING INTERNSHIPS 2014
MENTOR BRIEFING INTERNSHIPS 2014 MENTORING: A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH INTERNS THIS SUMMER PROGRAM TIMELINE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS WHAT TO EXPECT RESOURCES OVERVIEW WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO MENTOR? MENTORING:
More information