Cooperation Indonesia-The Netherlands

Transcription

1 WOTRO Science for Global Development Call for proposals 2018 Cooperation Indonesia-The Netherlands Resilient water, food and rule of law The Hague, March 2018 Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

2 Contents 1 Introduction Background Available budget Validity of the call for proposals 4 2 Aim 5 3 Guidelines for applicants Who can apply What can be applied for When can applications be submitted Preparing an application Conditions on granting Submitting an application 15 4 Assessment procedure Procedure Assessment criteria Project monitoring & evaluation Governance 19 5 Contact details and other information Contact Other information 21 6 Annexes 22 2

3 1 Introduction A long term scientific collaboration exists between Indonesia and The Netherlands which is further strengthened in a new collaboration to address scientific and societal issues of interest to both countries. The Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RISTEKDIKTI) and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) work together in the Cooperation Indonesia-The Netherlands programme to finance joint research that is in alignment with the national science agendas of Indonesia and the Netherlands, the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the EU Societal Challenges. This first call aims at further developing the scientific and societal agenda on the topics of (i) food, (ii) water and (iii) rule of law. It invites consortia of research institutes and other organisations (both public and private 1 ) in the Netherlands and in Indonesia to submit joint full proposals, preceded by a Letter of Intent. The call is executed by NWO- WOTRO Science for Global Development. 1.1 Background Joint fundamental and applied research programmes by Indonesia and the Netherlands have been carried out for decades. 2 The renewed MoU on research and education between the two countries (signed April 2016) provides the framework for continuation of the scientific collaboration between Indonesia and the Netherlands. This call results from a collaboration between NWO and the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RISTEKDIKTI). The intention is to establish a partnership with joint financing, where each country supports its own research. It invites consortia of research institutes and other organisations (both public and private) in the Netherlands and in Indonesia to submit joint full proposals, preceded by a Letter of Intent. The initiative has been supported by the Netherlands embassy and the NUFFIC NESO office in Jakarta. The aim of the Cooperation Indonesia-The Netherlands programme is to: strengthening cooperation in the fields of science and innovation; address the pressing current problems in society, to strengthen research capabilities and to encourage scientific excellence in Indonesia and the Netherlands through interactions of scientists and scholars at institutions in both countries; promote interdisciplinary research in areas of medium and long term interest, particularly those related to mutual priorities. This call for both basic and applied research will finance interdisciplinary research by teams that include for-profit or not-for-profit private partners, to enhance the 1 This includes any type of organisation that can be seen as an actor or stakeholder who has an interest in participating in research, both public: governmental (departments of line ministries or local governments, extension services), and private: for-profit enterprises and related support organisations, and other nongovernmental organisations (registered NGOs, cooperatives, unions, civil society organisations). 2 The long term partnership has resulted in several joint programmes run via NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development and Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), such as the Irian Jaya Studies Programme, ISIR ( ), the Agriculture Beyond Food programme ( ) and the Scientific Programme Indonesia Netherlands (SPIN, ) and more than 250 individual projects and DC fellowships in the period

4 impact of research for society. This means that a wide range of disciplines as well as knowledge from private sector, civil society and policy should be integrated in the research. The award under this call would be for a period of three years. 1.2 Available budget The total budget available is M 1,5 for six projects. A maximum of 250,000 euro can be applied for at NWO per project, with a duration of three years. The budget request must follow the norms and regulations of NWO. A top-up grant with a maximum of 40,000 euro guaranteed in the first year can be obtained by an Indonesian researcher if the Indonesian researcher is awarded for funding in 2018 by RISTEKDIKTI. This is a non-compulsory condition for this call. Inclusion of a RISTEKDIKTI funded researcher will be considered an added value. 1.3 Validity of the call for proposals This call for proposals is valid until the closing date 14 June 2018, 14:00 hours CE(S)T. Applications must be preceded by a Letter of Intent explaining the outlines of the planned project proposal, using the format provided. This Letter of Intent must be received by NWO ultimately one month before the deadline of the Call, being 17 May 2018, 14:00 CE(S)T. Proposals that are not preceded by such a Letter of Intent are excluded from the selection procedure. 4

5 2 Aim 2.1 Aim and Objectives The scientific collaboration between Indonesia and the Netherlands has a long tradition of partnerships that increasingly focus on societal challenges and include, next to researchers, stakeholders from the public and private sector. Many of the challenges that the two countries face are global in nature and require flexibility and creativity to face them. Societies are increasingly subject to external, sudden changes and need to strengthen their resilience to be able to address these complexities. How do we manage all these issues in a sustainable and inclusive manner? How can we make people, systems and societies more resilient to face these challenges? Which systems, institutions and measures do we need to support transformations and implement solutions? The aim of this call is to contribute to a resilient society in the fields of water, food and rule of law, by inviting public and private partners to collaborate with academic researchers in formulating research questions and addressing the challenging key issues. This collaborative research is intended to work towards scientific knowledge and innovative solutions in order to contribute to realizing and supporting resilient societies. The objectives of this call for proposals are: to further develop the scientific and societal agenda on food, water and the rule of law; to create the appropriate inter- and transdisciplinary research partnerships from both countries; to contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular to SDGs 2, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14 (food and water/maritime) and SDGs 16, 5 and 10 (governance & law). The three subject chosen are high on the agenda of the collaboration between Indonesia and The Netherlands, and both countries envision mutual benefits in jointly addressing the challenges of these foci with innovative research. In the Netherlands water, food and rule of law are prominent in plans of the Netherlands Embassy in Jakarta. 3 During the Open Science Meeting (OSM) 2017 in Yogyakarta, they were discussed in various sessions. This call builds upon the initial trajectory to formulate the subjects by Indonesian and Dutch researchers, the discussions at the OSM and between the collaborators in this call Research foci The Call is open for joint research projects that focus on one or more of the themes below: Food Security and Agriculture Food and nutrition security have become a key priority in Indonesian politics. While food security improves rapidly in many middle-income countries, half of all households in Indonesia remain vulnerable, and 70% of the poor live in rural areas. The vulnerability is aggravated by the effects of climate change. The pathways into and out of poverty have changed and problems of vulnerability and food insecurity 3 See the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan Indonesia. 4 The collaborators in this call are grateful for the role of the KNAW via its SPIN programme in developing the OSM sessions, thereby contributing to the development of this call, as well as for the input in that trajectory by the Indonesian Academy of Sciences (AIPI). 5

6 are increasing. Novel and integrated forms of inquiry, focused on understanding the vulnerability of rural communities in transitional environments in Indonesia are needed to make policies more effective in fighting food insecurity. Agriculture and agricultural and food chain development have reemerged as important political themes and a major concern of the Indonesian government. Research is invited to address one or more of the following themes: Sustainable production of nutritious food, especially for vulnerable populations; Agrarian transformations to address food security (sustainable solutions that build upon understanding historical, political and contemporary processes of social, economic, cultural, and demographic change); Food chain development with transparent markets and shorter value chains, to the benefit of farmers and fishermen. The research should relate the theme(s) to issues of security, risk, conflict and resilience, while paying attention to the context of climate change, and unstable global commodity chains Regional Planning that includes Water Management and Hydrology In recent years, many flood related hazards occurred in Indonesia which have resulted in a lot of fatalities and economic and social damage. These flood events have been partly caused by large-scale land use changes (deforestation and urbanization) and aggravated by climate change. At the same time, droughts are increasingly a problem in many parts of Indonesia and affecting the water availability for agriculture and other purposes (drinking water, industry). Sanitary Engineering (drinking water treatment; waste water treatment and sewerage) is an important way to prevent the spread of human water borne diseases. In Indonesia there is a constant struggle to keep the infrastructure in line with the demand of the growing population in the cities. Research is invited to work on sustainable smart innovations that include integration of water resource management (e.g. by linking water sources) and various levels of governance, including informal interactions. Governance here is understood as more than a formal one-sided and top-down process exclusively dominated by government institutions. Instead, it concerns a complex set of decision making processes and trajectories of implementation, often with unintended outcomes, in which a variety of (trans-)national government and non-government institutions and formal and informal actors participate, while there is no overall and formal control mechanism in place Governance and Rule of law There has been a strong move towards rule of law in Indonesia, furthering access to justice for the poor and vulnerable, an increased emphasis on realising (human) rights, and growing attention for physical and social security of citizens. On the other hand, many challenges are apparent which hamper the implementation of rule of law, because of the push and pull of interest, views and values. Examples are clientelistic governance practices, problems in the functioning of the judiciary, power politics overriding legal rights, and continuing problems of access to justice. The resilience of Indonesia s new guardian institutions such as the National Human Rights Commission, the Ombudsman and the Anti-Corruption Commission will be an important step for the promise of such institutions generally. Which factors determine whether they succeed or fail? The same goes for judicial reform: what have been its effects so far? Why, for instance, do citizens not seek justice or what obstacles do they face in their attempts to do so? Research on justice, human rights and security is invited to provide answers to such questions. Better knowledge on the functioning of the rule of law is a precondition for effective intervention, and therefore a focus on the formal and informal processes of rule of law practice is needed. The research is 6

7 expected to contribute to wider debates about the functioning of the rule of law in order to strengthen justice, rights and security. 2.3 Specific project conditions Given the complexity of addressing and reaching impact for the challenges addressed, the research and innovation teams should be inter- and transdisciplinary in nature. This means that a wide range of disciplines as well as knowledge from beyond the boundaries of the scientific community should be integrated. Research and innovation projects should therefore evolve in a process of co-creation with different partners: both stakeholders and researchers should be actively involved throughout the entire project process, in (advising on) defining and conducting the research as well as in communicating the progress and results, in order to jointly produce a mutually valued outcome. Added value may be achieved by integrating and synthesising various sources of knowledge to create new knowledge and by creating sustainability through the development of longterm knowledge relations. In order to better ground policies and/or programmes and enhance their societal impacts for the most vulnerable people targeted, project proposals must be demonstrably linked to their political, economic, social and/or biophysical settings. These can be local, national, regional and/or global in nature. Box 1. What is meant by innovation and co-creation? Innovation is the process of developing new value adding ways to meet existing, new or inarticulate needs. Innovation is accomplished through more effective products, processes, services, technologies, policies or ideas that are readily available to governments, markets and society. Co-creation is a form of cooperation in research where different parties (stakeholders, target groups) in the knowledge (demand and supply) process are engaged in interaction and joint learning on the problem definition, formulation of possible solutions, design of the research, conducting the research, the assessment of the results, and the translation of these in new practices and products. The diversity of perspectives and of the type and level of knowledge is seen as an asset that can be addressed in a constructive way of mutual learning and design. Impact Pathway Planning, and monitoring & evaluation are important instruments for project management and for facilitating research impact. The projects are asked to provide a Theory of Change with a related Research Impact Pathway and indicators as well as a Research Uptake plan to support this process of change. A Theory of Change describes how the research process contributes to impact, taking into account the context, actors involved and describing the sequence of logically-linked cause-effect relations. It is both a process (reflection) and a product (tool) for formulating activities and strategies. The Research Impact Pathway is the visualization of the change process and accompanying assumptions from problem definition to the identification of knowledge gaps through research design and execution to the realization of expected output and outcomes and the desired contribution to impact. The Research Impact Pathway forms the basis for defining indicators, at output and outcome levels. Thus, the 7

8 Theory of Change leads to the Research Impact Pathway and then into the indicators for monitoring progress and adjusting the research, if necessary. This is especially the case where the assumptions proved insufficient or incorrect. Each proposal should explicate in an impact pathway how the project works towards the realisation of the objectives of this call. A format of an impact pathway is provided in the application form of this call. The Theory of Change and Impact Pathway will be an important element of the M&E of a project, for joint learning and adjusting the project, and for reporting. Box 2: Output, outcome and impact Research outputs relate to the direct and immediate results obtained by a research project or programme; Research outcomes relate to the changes in behaviour, relationships, actions, or activities of stakeholders as a result of sharing and uptake of research; Research impact is defined as changes in economic, environmental and social conditions a project or programme is aiming at. Change is a complex process that depends on a variety of actors and factors of which research is only one. Where research outputs fall under the direct sphere of control of a research project or programme, outcomes belong to their sphere of influence and impact to their sphere of interest. 8

9 3 Guidelines for applicants 3.1 Who can apply Applications can be submitted by consortia that include: 1. a Dutch research organisation, acting as the main applicant 5 ; 2. an Indonesian-based research organisation; 3. at least one other for-profit or not-for profit private and/or public matching partner to enhance the impact of research for society; 4. a researcher awarded granting for 2018 by RISTEKDIKTI (non-compulsory but considered an added value). For the 2018 call for Proposals, a list of examples of relevant research proposals awarded in 2018 by RISTEKDIKTI can be found in Annex 1. In case of inclusion of an awarded researcher to the consortium, the awarded granting by RISTEKDIKTI can be considered as top-up funding to the NWO grant. The awarded researcher by RISTEKDIKTi is not necessarily the consortium partner, but may also be a member of the research team. A Consortium Agreement between the collaborating consortium organisations is obligatory (see section 3.5 for details). The main applicant serves as the recipient of the NWO grant and should hold a senior position at a Dutch research organisation. He or she will act as project coordinator and point of contact with NWO and will submit the research proposal. The main applicant s organisation will take responsibility for the project secretariat, the day-to-day management and all financial affairs of the research project. Together, the consortium members will 1) formulate relevant research questions and approaches; 2) formulate and submit the proposal through the main applicant; 3) conduct the project activities; 4) coordinate knowledge sharing and support the application, dissemination and communication of the project results to a broader group of (local) possible knowledge users that are not a member of the consortium; and 5) take responsibility for the adequate and timely reporting conditions. Each main applicant and consortium can only submit one proposal. To enhance demand articulation, ownership and the effective uptake of results, all consortium partners as well as relevant stakeholders are expected to be engaged in all phases of the project execution, from its inception to sharing the (emerging) results. Evidence of such active engagement will be an important element in the assessment of project proposals and may be demonstrated through references to involvement in project preparation, active involvement as a project partner and links between the proposed research project and ongoing projects of NGOs, private enterprises, and/or policy implementation. 5 Research organisations are institutions that: - have as one of their main objectives to carry out independent research or provide higher education; - have no profit motive other than that for the purposes of further research or higher education; - whose researchers enjoy freedom of publication in the international academic literature. 9

10 3.2 What can be applied for Consortia can apply for a project with a duration of three years. The maximum grant of NWO is 250,000 euro. This call invites full proposals to be submitted, preceded by a Letter of Intent. All consortium members have to be involved in the formulation of the research questions, in the development of the proposal and in the execution of the research project. Each consortium can apply for one project only. General characteristics for proposals Full proposals should make clear how they will constitute and operationalize activities and projects for the following facilities: Research and innovation Proposals should be based on a thorough review of existing knowledge and should preferably be complementary to existing research initiatives and reinforce these were possible. The consortia should be inter-/trans-disciplinary in nature and thus crossing scientific disciplinary boundaries (interdisciplinarity) and integrating scientific and practitioners knowledge in joint research (transdisciplinarity). Project teams are encouraged to use a combination of quantitative and qualitative and quasi-experimental research methods, including operational research and should include research-into-use approaches. Additional added value concerns: integrating and synthesising various sources of knowledge to create new knowledge; creating sustainability through the development of long-term knowledge relations. Collaboration with relevant and especially complementary research initiatives (e.g. at the level of a country or region), needs to be considered and, if applicable, be included in the proposal. Knowledge sharing & Research uptake As development of research and innovation in private, governmental and civil society sectors is basically a continuous and iterative process, a clear strategy for Research Uptake (including stakeholder engagement, capacity development and communication, also with the aim to influence the enabling environment) needs to be provided: Stakeholder engagement: stakeholders need to be involved from the research proposal stage onwards. This includes an initial mapping of relevant stakeholders in the proposal. For the IPs this includes their involvement in the proposal development workshop. Capacity development and training: activities directed at improving the capabilities of individuals, networks and institutes to learn and innovate, based on sustainable partnerships and the ability to both generate and build on knowledge. Communication: a communication strategy, including specification of target groups, messages to communicate, means of communication etc. is part of the proposal. Aim is to make knowledge and research results available and accessible for stakeholders. Monitoring & evaluation: including revision of Theory of Change with Impact Pathway and research uptake strategy, where appropriate (see 4.1). Project activities must be well integrated. Output, outcome and impact should contribute to clearly defined objectives as presented in a Research Impact Pathway, which should be supported by a Theory of Change which includes the underlying assumptions and the food system perspective. 10

11 Reimbursable costs The following costs can be reimbursed by a NWO grant with a maximum of 250,000 euro. Please note that personnel of private partners is excluded from payment of salaries and research costs from the NWO grant budget. I. Personnel costs of project staff 6 Subsidy can be requested for the time that staff members work on the project. To determine the reimbursable salary costs, a distinction is made between personnel from Dutch universities and personnel from all other organisations. Personnel costs of project staff: PhD and post-doc researchers (to be) employed by research organisations: - The maximum tariffs for the PhD and post-doc researchers employed by research organisations in the Netherlands are based upon the NWO-VSNU contract subject to change. In case a PhD is not 3 but 4 years, financing of the additional year must be available and demonstrated; - PhD and post-doc researchers employed by LMICs research organisations can be provided with a net monthly living allowance. The living allowance is expected to cover all personal costs, including housing, organisational overhead, medical costs, insurances, travel to and from work, et cetera. The regulations of the main applicant s institute should be guiding for determining the amount of the living allowances. However, costs for 1 full time equivalents (fte) junior research may not exceed 4,500 euro a month, costs for 1 fte senior may not exceed 6,500 euro a month; - For each (LMIC and Dutch) PhD or post-doc researcher, who is appointed for 0.5 fte for at least two years, a bench fee of 5,000 euro is available. The bench fee is meant to support the academic career of the researchers (e.g. congress visits, books, publications (Open Access), thesis, courses). - For Ma/MSc student(s) only research costs are financed. Replacement grants for permanent academic staff actively supporting the project up to 25,000 euro for a total project duration of three years. Personnel costs of project support staff of more than 0,4 fte, not employed by the research organisations: - Salaries for project staff not employed by research organisations must be guided by the organisations norms and legal regulations of the country concerned, but is limited to the maximum gross full-time monthly rate of 4,500 euro (all costs included). - Reimbursable costs of (not-for-profit) project staff not employed by research organisations should not exceed 15 per cent of the budget for personnel costs of project staff. II. Research costs Only costs directly related to the project are eligible for reimbursement. These costs should be specified and substantiated in the proposal. Infrastructural expenses (housing, standard office computers), commuter traffic and other costs relating to overhead are not eligible for funding, nor are expenses covered by the bench fee. International travel and accommodation costs for exchange of project staff between participating consortium members (max. three months per project, per post-doc or PhD). Salaries for technical and administrative support staff that is engaged for less than 0.4 fte during the running time of the project. Salaries must be guided by the organisations norms and legal regulations of the country concerned but is limited to the maximum gross full-time monthly rate of 3,200 euro (all costs 6 Project staff refers to individuals who actually conduct the project activities. Overhead costs (including but not limited to academic supervision of PhD s or post-docs) are excluded from reimbursement, except for LMICs. 11

12 included). (Use of) durables (buildings excluded), consumables, use of existing data/information, interview costs, et cetera. III. Knowledge sharing & research uptake costs Cooperation between researchers and expert practitioners will help deepen our knowledge but also increase the likelihood that research results will be used, and subsequently improve the impact of research. Therefore, both practitioners and researchers should be actively involved throughout the entire project process, in (advising on) defining and conducting the research as well as in communicating the progress and results. To encourage this, costs for knowledge sharing (and utilization) are available from this grant. Knowledge sharing activities should preferably be directed to enabling practitioners beyond the project staff to co-formulate the project, be aware of the project( s progress), its output and be involved in making the output accessible and applicable for practitioners. Reimbursable costs for knowledge sharing and research uptake activities should be included for stakeholder engagement, capacity development, communication and monitoring & evaluation. This includes: Costs for organizing a compulsory kick-off workshop for the project consortium with practitioners (incl. target group representatives where possible) beyond the consortium organized immediately after the actual start of the project to raise awareness on and fine tune the project plans. Costs for activities during the project s running time for sharing project plans and (intermediate) project findings with relevant national and international practitioners (and scientists) beyond the consortium. Costs for end-of-project workshop and consultations with relevant practitioners beyond the consortium. Costs for producing policy briefs, lay-men publications, books, and other (visual/audio) approaches or tools to enhance knowledge sharing and use. Costs should be made during the running time of the project. Please note that knowledge sharing costs of for-profit partners is excluded from payment from the NWO grant budget. IV. Audit costs (for all other organisations than a Dutch university) For projects where the main applicant is not from a Dutch university NWO s regulations require that an independent audit should be carried out at the end of the project in order to review and verify the correct use and justification of the grant and potential co-funding contributions. This is applicable for a main applicant from: (1) all non-dutch research organisations, and (2) for Dutch research organisations other than universities. An amount of 5,000 at most can be budgeted for this audit. NWO has separate regulations in place for Dutch universities. Thus when a main applicant is from a Dutch university the project audit is not needed. Top-up funding to the NWO grant If a researcher awarded granting for 2018 by RISTEKDIKTI is part of the consortium or the research team, the awarded funding by RISTEKDIKTI can be considered as top-up funding to the NWO grant. This RISTEKDIKTI funding is a maximum of 40,000 euro guaranteed for the first year. Awarded researchers may be given priorities for funding for the following two years, subject to the selection process and availability of the RISTEKDIKTI s funding. 12

13 3.3 When can applications be submitted The deadline for submitting the compulsory Letter of Intent is 17 May 2018, hours CE(S)T. The Letter of Intent must be submitted by to: The deadline for the submission of full proposals is 14 June 2018, hours CE(S)T. The assessment round will take approximately four months. For an overview of the procedure timelines, please see Section Preparing an application Submitting the Letter of Intent The Letter of Intent must be received by NWO-WOTRO ultimately about 4 weeks before the deadline of the call, notably 17 May 2018 at 14:00 hours CE(S)T. The Letter of Intent is a mandatory step in the procedure. Proposals that are not preceded by a Letter of Intent or without the required format are excluded from the competition. A Letter of Intent must be sent by the main applicant to indonesia-nl@nwo.nl The Letter of Intent should be written in English, and should be submitted on the writing paper of the institute of the main applicant. The Letter of Intent should be signed by the main applicant. The format for a Letter of Intent can be found in Annex 2. Submitting the application The deadline for the full proposal is 14 June 2018 at 14:00 hours CE(S)T. An application can only be submitted to NWO-WOTRO via the online application system ISAAC. The main applicant should submit his/her application via his/her own ISAAC account. Please note: In case a main applicant does not have an ISAAC account he/she is advised to create an account at least five working days before submitting the application, to ensure that any registration problems can be resolved in time. Especially if the applicant s organisation is not listed in ISAAC it is vital to take five working days into account to ensure correct registration (a request for registration of the applicant s organisation in the ISAAC system should be sent to relatiebeheer@nwo.nl). The application forms can be downloaded from the electronic application system ISAAC or from NWO s website (on the grant page of this call). Before completing the application form, please read the information and guidelines provided in Annex 2 of this call. Please arrange the annexes (for a list of annexes see Section 6) in PDF before starting your submission. When the application form has been completed, save the form (including annexes) as a pdf and upload it in ISAAC. When you submit your application to ISAAC you will also need to enter additional details online. It is advised to start submitting your application at least one day before the deadline of this call for proposals. Applications submitted after the deadline will not be taken into consideration. For technical questions please contact the ISAAC helpdesk, see Section

14 3.5 Conditions on granting Applications submitted to NWO must fulfil the NWO Grant Rules 2017 and WOTRO Regulations on Granting and all of the formal criteria mentioned in this call in order to be admitted to the competition. The conditions for the awarded project apply only to the grants provided by NWO. For the grants provided by RISTEKDIKTI the regulations of RISTEKDIKTI apply. Intellectual property rights and Consortium Agreement NWO encourages and facilitates the transfer of research results to industrial and other partner and will provide steering and will endorse contractual arrangements to be drawn up by the consortium. With regard to ownership of results, such as on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Confidentiality of Results and Knowledge transfer to Developing Countries, the conditions and requirements as specified in the WOTRO Regulations apply. Project partners are required to conclude a Consortium Agreement. A consortium agreement has to be signed by all project partners and approved of by NWO- WOTRO before the first payment can be made. The Consortium Agreement must include a description on how LMICs will be able to benefit from the (patented) results under market conditions that safeguard local affordability including but not restricted to sublicenses for humanitarian purposes. A format for the Consortium Agreement is available on the NWO-WOTRO website. A draft (not necessarily signed) Consortium Agreement should already be added as an annex to the application form. Accountability With regard to accountability of the projects, the General Provisions of the NWO Regulation on Granting apply. When the results from the financed research are published or presented, the financial support received from NWO-WOTRO must be acknowledged, stating the project number. Open Access All scientific publications resulting from research that is funded by grants derived from this call for proposals are to be immediately (at the time of publication) freely accessible worldwide (Open Access). There are several ways for researchers to publish Open Access. A detailed explanation regarding Open Access can be found on Data management Responsible data management is part of good research. NWO wants research data that emerge from publicly funded research to become freely and sustainably available, as much as possible, for reuse by other researchers. Furthermore NWO wants to raise awareness among researchers about the importance of responsible data management. Proposals should therefore satisfy the data management protocol of NWO. This protocol consists of two steps: 1. Data management section The data management section is part of the research proposal. Researchers should answer four questions about data management within their intended research project. Therefore before the research starts the researcher will be asked to think about how the data collected must be ordered and categorised so that it can be made freely available. Measures will often need to be taken during the production and analysis of the data to make their later storage and dissemination possible. Researchers can state which research data they consider to be relevant for storage and reuse. 14

15 2. Data management plan After a proposal has been awarded funding the researcher should elaborate the data management section into a data management plan. The data management plan is a concrete elaboration of the data management section. In the plan the researcher describes whether use will be made of existing data or a new data collection and how the data collection will be made FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable. The plan should be submitted to NWO via ISAAC within a maximum of 4 months after the proposal has been awarded funding. NWO will approve the plan as quickly as possible. Approval of the data management plan by NWO is a condition for disbursement of the funding. The plan can be adjusted during the research. Further information about the data management protocol of NWO can be found at Nagoya Protocol The Nagoya Protocol became effective on 12 October 2014 and ensures an honest and reasonable distribution of benefits emerging from the use of genetic resources (Access and Benefit Sharing; ABS). Researchers who make use of genetic sources from the Netherlands or abroad for their research should familiarise themselves with the Nagoya Protocol ( NWO assumes that researchers will take all necessary actions with respect to the Nagoya Protocol. 3.6 Submitting an application An application can only be submitted to NWO via the online application system ISAAC. Applications not submitted via ISAAC will not be taken into consideration. A principal applicant must submit his/her application via his/her own ISAAC account. If the principal applicant does not have an ISAAC account yet, he/she is advised to create an account at least five working days before submitting the application, to ensure that any registration problems can be resolved in time. If the principal applicant already has an NWO-account, then he/she does not need to create a new account to submit an application. When you submit your application to ISAAC you will also need to enter additional details online. You should therefore start submitting your application at least one day before the deadline of this call for proposals. Applications submitted after the deadline will not be taken into consideration. For technical questions please contact the ISAAC helpdesk, see Section

16 4 Assessment procedure 4.1 Procedure The NWO Code of Conduct on Conflicts of Interest applies to all persons and NWO staff involved in the assessment and/or decision-making process. The Letters of intent will not be assessed and are meant to gauge the interest in this call and organise the assessment procedure appropriately. Eligibility The first step in the assessment procedure is to determine the admissibility of the application. All project proposals received via ISAAC are screened by the NWO- WOTRO secretariat for compliance with formal eligibility. Eligibility concerns compliance with the conditions set in this call. Formal criteria include (but may not be limited to): Timely received Letter of Intent and application via NWO s electronic application system ISAAC; Application has been submitted by the main applicant who holds a senior position within a collaborating Dutch research organisation; Specific conditions (as outlined in Section 3.2 and Annex 2) have been applied; Completed and signed application form; The project entails research in the realm of this call; Composition of consortium complies with the requirements; Format, length of text, language (English) is as required; Budget conditions are met; Completed annexes are added. Completed annexes: Letters of commitment outlining the availability and commitment of consortium members, signed by heads of the participating department or organisation; CVs of applicants (if already appointed); List of literature references; Letter of support concerning use of data (if applicable); Draft Consortium Agreement; Excel file of the project budget. No additional annexes are allowed. Applicants will receive written confirmation of receipt within two weeks after the deadline of this call, stating whether or not the application has been accepted into the selection procedure. Selection procedure If eligible, proposals will be reviewed on the basis of the selection criteria mentioned in Section 4.2. Independent, international expert advisors (peer reviewers) will pre-assess the proposals for all criteria. At least two referees' reports will be requested for all admissible proposals. The main applicant will be offered an opportunity to respond within five working days to the comments of the experts. 16

17 Advice During an assessment meeting, the International Advisory Committee (IAC) will discuss all proposals, pre-assessment reports and responses thereof by the applicant and will rank the proposals. The six projects to be awarded will be evenly divided between the three foci, two projects per focus. Based on the ranking and the spread across the foci, the IAC will present an advice on funding to the Steering Committee of NWO-WOTRO (SC). In case of insufficient quality for a specific focus, the IAC will advise upon allocation of an additional project to one of the other foci. The composition of the IAC will be agreed upon in consultation with RISTEKDIKTI. In case more than two project proposals from one research organisation co-funding this programme that have been admitted to the selection procedure have an overall score of at least very good, the IAC will advise the SC to fund the two proposals from this research organisation that rank highest while excluding the other(s) from funding, notwithstanding their high quality. In case of an ex aequo prioritisation preference will be given to proposal which includes a RISTEKDIKTI researcher in the project. The IAC may also provide an advice to the SC with regard to the feasibility of the planning and the value for money of the project proposal. The data management section (see also 3.5) in the application is not evaluated and hence not included in the decision about whether or not to award funding. However, the IAC can issue an advice with respect to the data management section. After a proposal has been awarded funding the applicant should elaborate the data management section into a data management plan. Applicants can make use of the advice from the IAC when they write the data management plan. The approval of the data management plan is one of the conditions that must be met before the project can start. Decision The SC will verify that the procedure has been conducted properly before taking a decision on granting. A maximum of two proposals of each research organisation - that are evaluated by the IAC- overall at least as very good will be taken into account for funding by the SC. The SC will decide on funding of proposals in consultation with RISTEKDIKTI, based on the ranking advice of the IAC and depending on the available call budget. In addition, the SC may decide to fund a project on the condition that the proposal/budget will be adjusted in order to increase the feasibility of the planning and/or the value for money of the project, in view of the advice of the IAC on these aspects. All main applicants will be informed in writing about the outcome of the selection procedure. NWO-WOTRO gives all full proposals a qualification 12. The applicant is informed of this qualification when the decision about whether or not to award funding is announced. For further information about the qualifications see A research project that is awarded a grant should start within three months after the granting date. 17 May 2018, before CE(S)T 14 June 2018, before (CE(S)T June-August 2018 End of August 2018 September 2018 Deadline submission of Letter of Intent by the main applicant Deadline submission full proposal by the main applicant Consultation referees Rebuttals from applicants Evaluation and formulation of advice on funding by the International Advisory Committee 17

18 October-November 2018 November 2018 March 2019 Decision on funding by the Steering Committee NWO-WOTRO informs the applicants about the decision Start of projects at the latest Whilst NWO-WOTRO aims to meet the target dates provided above, we reserve the right to change these at any stage. Appeals procedure If an applicant objects to a decision taken by the SC, it can lodge a complaint with the General Board of NWO through the NWO Appeals Committee. Any written appeal against a decision taken by the SC must be lodged within six weeks after the day on which the notice of this decision was sent. 4.2 Assessment criteria The following criteria will be used by the committee in assessing the proposals: I. Scientific quality Potential to generate new knowledge and insights and complementarity to other research programmes, including the added value of the RISTEKDIKTI funded one; Adequacy of the research approach including the robustness of the conceptual framework or experimental set-up, and the coherence of the hypotheses, research questions and methods; Feasibility of the research design; Complementarity, range and level of integration of the interdisciplinary approach. II. Relevance for innovation in development Extent to which the proposal is rooted in the demands of partners and/or stakeholders, and adequacy of the reflection of this demand in the transdisciplinary approach (integrating scientific and stakeholder knowledge in joint research); Extent of alignment with one or more of the call s foci; Potential for long-term knowledge relations; Quality and feasibility of the research impact pathway with indicators. III. Quality of collaboration, capacity development and communication Strength of partnership and level of commitment of the partners and research team, including added value of a RISTEKDIKTI funded researcher; Potential for improving the capabilities of individuals and institutes to learn and innovate, the ability to share knowledge and create a supportive learning environment; Adequacy and feasibility of the communication strategy to influencing the policy and/or business environment; Adequacy of the team composition and budget. NWO and RISTEKDIKTI intend to make announcements about outcomes not later than November 2018, and earlier if possible. Awards will need to be taken up before April 2019, and be finalised at the latest by the end of March 2022, or the offers will lapse. 18

19 4.3 Project monitoring & evaluation Monitoring & Evaluation Annually, projects must submit a popular summary (max. two pages) with an annual report, to inform NWO-WOTRO and RISTEKDIKTI on project progress, experiences and output. The project will also be evaluated at the end of the projects running time by selfassessment. This includes a workshop of the project team organised by the consortium and a discussion of the results with stakeholders from outside the project team. The final report will be based both on a reflection on the project s impact pathway and its indicators, and on the conclusions of the workshop. Final accountability The main applicant of the research project has the full responsibility of the whole NWO project budget, and needs to provide, at the latest three months after the end of the research project, a financial and a factual report on the project, showing how the NWO grant as well as the co-funding of the research organisation has been spent (if applicable). The financial and factual report needs to be signed by the project manager and financial controller of the collaborating Dutch research organisation. NWO-WOTRO reserves the right to externally evaluate projects financed under this call. The project ends with the issuing of the grant settlement decision. This decision is taken after approval of the final document(s) by NWO-WOTRO. Programme conference During the final year of this programme ( ) a conference will be organized (part of the project budget with additional payment by the programme) in which all consortia are expected to take part. This symposium will offer an opportunity to exchange results, enhance impact and evaluate the programme as a whole. 4.4 Governance For this call for proposals The Steering Committee (SC) of NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development is the decision making body in consultation with the Executive Board of NWO - and is responsible for: Approving of the call; Appointing members of the International Advisory Committee (IAC); Allocating funding to the NWO granted projects, based on the advice of the IAC; Approval of the project evaluation reports; Formulating strategic plans and activities for the future of the collaboration. The SC consults RISTEKDIKTI before taking their decisions. The International Advisory Committee (IAC) is responsible for Assessment and ranking of project proposals; Advising the SC on funding of project proposals; Advising the SC on the approval of the project evaluation reports. The SC may ask the IAC to advise on other matters as well. 19

20 The IAC is composed of (international) researchers and academic- practitioner experts on the research foci of the call, two of whom are nominated by RISTEKDIKTI. The IAC is installed by the SC. The composition of the SC and IAC are published on the NWO-WOTRO website: NWO-WOTRO is responsible for the day-to-day management of the call, including organising the assessment procedures, for all (financial and other) administration with regard to awarded projects. NWO-WOTRO provides the secretariat of the SC and IAC. 20

21 5 Contact details and other information 5.1 Contact Specific questions For specific questions about the Cooperation Indonesia-The Netherlands programme and this call for proposals please contact: At NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development: Ms. Dr Cora Govers (coordinator) Ms. Rapti Miedema (policy officer) Telephone: Technical questions about the electronic application system ISAAC For technical questions about the use of ISAAC please contact the ISAAC helpdesk. Please read the manual first before consulting the helpdesk. The ISAAC helpdesk can be contacted from Monday to Friday between 10:00 and 17:00 hours CE(S)T on +31 (0) However, you can also submit your question by to You will then receive an answer within two working days. 5.2 Other information For more information on NWO-WOTRO, visit 21

22 6 Annexes Annex 1: Examples of relevant research proposals granted in 2018 by RISTEKDIKTI The full list of granted research projects is published here: Further information is available in Sections 1.2 and 3.2 of this call. If you need any further information regarding the research proposals granted in 2018 by RISTEKDIKTI, please contact: RISTEKDIKTI Mr. Hali Aprimadya Telephone: NO. NAMA PT KATEGORI JUDUL 1 ABDUL AZIZ NASIHUDDIN Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Rule of Law KLASIFIKASI DAN FORMULASI PRODUK HUKUM DAERAH MENURUT ASAS KESESUAIAN JENIS, HIERARKI DAN MATERI MUATAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN 2 ACHMAD IRWAN HAMZANI Universitas Pancasakti Rule of Law Model Kontribusi Hukum Islam terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Nasional 3 AHMAD KUSUMAATMAJA Universitas Gadjah Mada WATER TREATMENT Pengembangan Filter Berbasis Membran Nanofiber Untuk Penyediaan Air Bersih dan Pengolahan Limbah 4 AGUNG WAHYU HANDARU Universitas Negeri Jakarta REGIONAL PLANNING DESAIN BARU INFRASTRUKTUR DAN ATRAKSI WISATA PANTAI DI KABUPATEN BANGKA SELATAN 5 AGUS BUDHIE WIJATNA Universitas Gadjah Mada WATER TREATMENT PEMETAAN DAN KONSERVASI AIR-TANAH DENGAN PERUNUT HIDROISOTOP UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERSEDIAAN AIR BERSIH SECARA BERKELANJUTAN DI DAERAH RAWAN KEKERINGAN 6 AGUS PRASETYA Universitas Gadjah Mada WATER TREATMENT Removal Hg dari Air Limbah Tambang Emas Rakyat: Studi Kinetika Adsorpsi dan Fitoremediasi dalam Wetland Buatan Aliran Bawah Permukaan 7 AMIE KUSUMAWARDHANI Universitas Diponegoro SOSIAL MODEL KOLABORASI RANTAI PASOKAN DAGING SAPI UNTUK MENCIPTAKAN DISTRIBUSI PANGAN YANG EFEKTIF DAN EFISIEN 8 ANIS MASHDUROHATUN Universitas Islam Sultan Agung SOSIAL PENGEMBANGAN MODEL HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL MEREK DAGANG SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PADA LEMBAGA PERBANKAN DI JAWA TENGAH 9 ANTHON FREDDY SUSANTO Universitas Pasundan Rule of Law PENDIDIKAN HUKUM KLINIS (CLINICAL LEGAL EDUCATION) BERBASIS ETIKA-BUDAYA SUNDA YANG RELIGIUS KOSMIK SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF MODEL PENGUATAN SUMBER DAYA CALON PENEGAK HUKUM DI PERGURUAN TINGGI 10 ARIE SETYANINGRUM Universitas Gadjah Mada SOSIAL Implementasi Desa Digital: Kajian Transformasi Sosial masyarakat Desa melalui Budaya Teknologi 11 BERNARD HASIBUAN Universitas Sahid REGIONAL PLANNING Model Pengembangan Terintegrasi dan Berkelanjutan Kawasan Wisata Pangandaran BHERTA SRI EKO Pemanfaatan Media Sosial untuk Optimalisasi Model Kompetensi Komunikasi Antar Budaya dan Strategi 12 Universitas Multimedia Nusantara SOSIAL MURTININGSIH Manajemen Konflik Antar Etnis dan Agama di Jawa dan Bali 13 BUDIAWAN Universitas Indonesia Food Security Studi Pengembangan Dini Risiko Kanker akibat Bahan Kimia dalam Kemasan Pangan 14 BULAN PRABAWANI Universitas Diponegoro REGIONAL PLANNING Eksperimen Redenominasi: Perilaku Pengeluaran Ditinjau Dari Aspek Sosial Ekonomi 15 DELVIS AGUSMAN Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr PERANCANGAN SISTEM PENGOLAH AIR LAUT MENJADI AIR TAWAR PANAS MATAHARI DENGAN WATER TREATMENT Hamka PENAMBAHAN ENERGI TERBARUKAN DAN BERKELANJUTAN 16 DHARU TRIASIH Universitas Semarang SOSIAL 0PTIMALISASI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI ON LINE DI JAWA TENGAH 17 DIDIT WELLY UDJIANTO Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta REGIONAL PLANNING KONVERGENSI PENDAPATAN DAN PENGENTASAN KEMISKINAN DI KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL 18 DWI SUHARTANTO Politeknik Negeri Bandung REGIONAL PLANNING PENGEMBANGAN DESTINASI WISATA KREATIF BERBASIS LOYALITAS TURIS 19 DWITA SUTJININGSIH Universitas Indonesia WATER TREATMENT PENGEMBANGAN MODEL KORELASI TUTUPAN LAHAN KEDAP AIR DAN KUALITAS PERAIRAN PADA DAS CILIWUNG DYAH ADRIANTINI SINTHA OPTIMALISASI DANA DESA GUNA PENINGKATAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DI KABUPATEN MAGELANG 20 Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang REGIONAL PLANNING DEWI MELALUI BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA DI KAWASAN WISATA CANDI BOROBUDUR SISTEM MANAJEMEN KNOWLEDGE WORKER /DOSEN BERBASIS KOMPETENSI BAGI DI PERGURUAN 21 DYAH KUSUMASTUTI Universitas Widyatama SOSIAL TINGGI MENUJU WORLD CLASS QUALITY (Pemetaan Kompetensi Emosional, Sosial Dan Kognitif Bagi Dosen PT yang Menuju Ke World Class Quality) 22 ELI JAMILAH MIHARDJA Universitas Bakrie REGIONAL PLANNING Pembentukan Strategi City Branding dengan Memanfaatkan Potensi Ekowisata (Studi di Kabupaten Pinrang Sulawesi Selatan) 23 ELIS HERLINA Universitas Islam Nusantara SOSIAL MODEL PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN PADA PERJANJIAN FIDUSIA YANG TIDAK DIBUAT DENGAN AKTA NOTARIS DAN TIDAK DIDAFTARKAN DI KANTOR PENDAFTARAN FIDUSIA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN 24 ENDANG KOESTATI SRIHARINI Institut Pertanian Bogor REGIONAL PLANNING Manajemen Bahaya Wisata di Daerah Rawan Bencana Indonesia 25 ENY WIDAJATI Institut Pertanian Bogor Food Security PENINGKATAN KAPASITAS KELEMBAGAAN PRODUSEN BENIH UNTUK MENJAMIN KETERSEDIAAN BENIH PADI BERKELANJUTAN DAN MENDUKUNG KETAHANAN PANGAN 26 ETRIYA Institut Pertanian Bogor SOSIAL PENGARUH ORIENTASI KEWIRAUSAHAAN, INOVASI, DAN JEJARING SOSIAL PADA KINERJA USAHA PETANI SAYUR DI JAWA BARAT, INDONESIA 27 EVA LEILIYANTI Universitas Negeri Jakarta SOSIAL USULAN ACUAN KEBIJAKAN PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DALAM KAMPANYE POLITIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL 28 FLORENTINA KUSMIYATI Universitas Diponegoro Food Security SELEKSI MUTAN DALAM RANGKA PERAKITAN KULTIVAR KEDELAI TAHAN SALIN UNTUK MENDUKUNG SWASEMBADA PANGAN NASIONAL 29 I MADE PUTRAWAN Universitas Negeri Jakarta SOSIAL Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Nelayan Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kualitas Hidup Berdasarkaan Faktor-Faktor Seperti Kepeminpinan, Locus of Control, Kekohesifan, Innovativeness, dan Social Justice 30 IKA DARMIKA Universitas Djuanda Rule of Law Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku Tidak Pidana dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia (Kajian Khusus : Penerapan Diversi dan Keadilan Restoratif di Kota dan Kabupaten Bogor). 22

23 NO. NAMA PT KATEGORI JUDUL 31 INDAH SRI UTARI Universitas Negeri Semarang Rule of Law KONTROL SOSIAL DAN TREN PRILAKU MENYIMPANG ANAK: Studi Kriminologi terhadap Prilaku Anak yang Melanggar Hukum di Masyarakat 32 IRWAN MARTUA HIDAYANA Universitas Indonesia SOSIAL REKONSTRUKSI TAFSIR SOSIAL POLITIK ATAS PERKAWINAN ANAK 33 KARTIKA NURINGSIH Universitas Tarumanagara REGIONAL PLANNING PENGEMBANGAN WISATA ALAM BERBASIS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DI KABUPATEN KULONPROGO YOGYAKARTA 34 KHUDZAIFAH DIMYATI Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Rule of Law RELASI HUKUM DAN MORAL: Perspektif Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama 35 LUKMAN HAKIM Universitas Sebelas Maret REGIONAL PLANNING Model Pengembangan RPJM-Des Dalam Rangka Mengurangi Kemiskinan Dan Penguatan Infrastruktur Pedesaan: Sudut Pandang Dari Para Pemangku Kepentingan 36 MEIZAR RUSLI Universitas Pancasila REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL PENGEMBANGAN DESTINASI PARIWISATA HALAL 37 MIFTAHULKHAIRAH ANWAR Universitas Negeri Jakarta SOSIAL Model Kesantunan Berbahasa Indonesia di Media Sosial Berbasis Linguistik Fungsional sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik SARA 38 MINA ELFIRA Universitas Indonesia SOSIAL Gender, Islam, dan Kekuasaan: Dampak Perubahan Sosial dan Modernisasi terhadap kepemimpinan Perempuan di Pesantren 39 MUHAMAD Universitas Gadjah Mada REGIONAL PLANNING DESTINASI KEPARIWISATAAN ALAM KONEKTIFITAS UNGGULAN BERDAYA SAING (Aktualisasi Percepatan Destinasi Kepariwisataan Alam Mekanisme Jawa Timur-Bali) 40 MUHAMMAD BAIQUNI Universitas Gadjah Mada REGIONAL PLANNING PENGEMBANGAN FASILITAS DAN INFRASTRUKTUR UNTUK MENDUKUNG PENGEMBANGAN PARIWISATA SEBAGAI SUMBER EKONOMI UTAMA DI DESA SAMBIREJO PRAMBANAN 41 MUHAMMAD EDY SUSILO Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Media Sosial dan Integrasi Bangsa (Studi pada Interaksi dan Narasi Komunikasi antara Pemerintah dan SOSIAL Veteran Yogyakarta Masyarakat dalam Penyebaran Hoax) 42 NANANG RIZALI Universitas Sebelas Maret SOSIAL Aktualisasi Nilai-nilai Tionghoa Dalam Motif Batik Lasem 43 PONI SUKAESIH KURNIATI Universitas Komputer Indonesia REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL PEMBIAYAAN PEMBANGUNAN MELALUI DANA NON PEMERINTAH DI KOTA BANDUNG 44 PRIMA NAOMI Universitas Paramadina SOSIAL LITERASI KEUANGAN, SOSIALISASI KEUANGAN OLEH ORANG TUA, SIKAP TERHADAP UANG, DAN NARSISME PADA GENERASI MILENIAL DI INDONESIA RHINA UCHYANI PERUMUSAN INSENTIF EKONOMI UNTUK KONSERVASI LAHAN KERING GUNA MENINGKATKAN EFISIENSI 45 Universitas Sebelas Maret REGIONAL PLANNING FAJARNINGSIH USAHA TANI DAN DAYA SAING KOMODITAS JAGUNG DI JAWA TENGAH 46 RIKA HARINI Universitas Gadjah Mada Food Security Analisis Sistem Informasi Geografi dalam Menentukan Optimasi Produksi Pertanian untuk Mencapai Ketahanan Pangan di Daerah Perbatasan Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. RIMA VIEN PERMATA 47 HARTANTO Universitas Sebelas Maret SOSIAL 48 ROCHIYATI MURNININGSIH Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang REGIONAL PLANNING 49 SAMUEL ANANTADJAYA Universitas Swiss German REGIONAL PLANNING 50 SITI MUTIAH SETYAWATI Universitas Gadjah Mada WATER TREATMENT 51 SITI RUKAYAH Universitas Diponegoro REGIONAL PLANNING PARALEGAL DAN AKSES PEREMPUAN TERHADAP KEADILAN : KAJIAN TENTANG PERAN DAN STRATEGI PARALEGAL DALAM PEMENUHAN AKSES KEADILAN BAGI PEREMPUAN KORBAN KEKERASAN DI KOTA SURAKARTA PENINGKATAN DAYA SAING UMKM PARIWISATA MELALUI PENGUATAN JEJARING BISNIS LOCAL ORIENTED DI JAWA TENGAH MODEL PENGEMBANGAN WISATA KULINER BETAWI BERDASARKAN POTENSI LOKAL BERBASIS MASYARAKAT DI SETU BABAKAN JAKARTA Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal Berbasis Komunitas di Wilayah Rentan Bencana Melalui Pengembangan Desa Wisata, Desa Banjararum, Kecamatan Kalibawang, Kabupaten Kulon Progo PEMETAAN ARSITEKTUR DAN PERANCANGAN KOTA KAWASAN PESISIR OLD SEMARANG Dan Usulan Tindakan Konservasi Guna Menunjang Pariwisata Heritage 52 SUPARWOKO Universitas Islam Indonesia REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL INOVASI PENDEKATAN PERANCANGAN PERKOTAAN YOGYAKARTA ISTIMEWA 53 SUPRIHATIN Institut Pertanian Bogor WATER TREATMENT PERANCANGAN PROSES PEROLEHAN KEMBALI AMMONIUM DAN FOSFOR DARI AIR LIMBAH SECARA SIMULTAN UNTUK MENCEGAH PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN DAN MENGHASILKAN PUPUK SLOW RELEASE 54 SUPRIYADI Universitas Negeri Semarang REGIONAL PLANNING PENELITIAN AMBLESAN DAN KERENTANAN KEGEMPAAN UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN WISATA DI KAWASAN KOTA LAMA SEMARANG 55 SYLVIA YAZID Universitas Katolik Parahyangan REGIONAL PLANNING Perumusan Model Pemanfaatan Remitansi Berbasis Komunitas Buruh Migran Perempuan dalam Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan 56 THEMOTIA TITI WIDANINGSIH Universitas Sahid REGIONAL PLANNING Model Pengembangan Brand Destinasi Wisata Budaya Perkampungan Budaya Setu Babakan 57 TITIN FATIMAH Universitas Tarumanagara REGIONAL PLANNING PEMETAAN BUDAYA (CULTURAL MAPPING) DI DESA GIRITENGAH, BOROBUDUR, MAGELANG SEBAGAI UPAYA AWAL PENYUSUNAN PERENCANAAN PARIWISATA BERKELANJUTAN 58 USEP SUHUD Universitas Negeri Jakarta REGIONAL PLANNING MENCIPTAKAN PRODUK PARIWISATA BERBASIS PAKAIAN TRADISIONAL SEBAGAI UPAYA MELESTARIKAN TEKSTIL NUSANTARA DAN MEMBERDAYAKAN UMKM INDUSTRI KREATIF 59 VITA BRILIANA Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trisakti SOSIAL PENGARUH MOTIVASI, PELUANG DAN KEMAMPUAN MENGGUNAKAN SOSIAL MEDIA BAGI PELANGGAN PRODUK UKM TERHADAP KETERLIBATAN PENGGUNAAN SOSIAL MEDIA DI ERA MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN (MEA) 60 YOLANDA MASNITA Universitas Trisakti REGIONAL PLANNING Faktor faktor Sukses dan Model enyelenggaraan Keuangan Inklusif yang Berkelanjutan, Dalam Rangka Pengembangan UMK, Peningkatan Pendapatan dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan (Studi Kasus Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Syariah - LKMS di Jabodetabek) 23

24 Annex 2. General instructions for applicants Format Letter of Intent The Letter of Intent is a mandatory step in the procedure. Proposals that are not preceded by a Letter of Intent are excluded from the competition. The Letter of Intent should be written in English, and should be submitted on the writing paper of the institute of the main applicant, using the format below. The Letter of Intent should be signed by the main applicant. Please copy the following on the writing paper and complete: Subject: Letter of Intent Call for proposals, 2018 Cooperation Indonesia-The Netherlands Programme Project title Project duration Names and affiliation of consortium members Summary of the project Max. 750 words. including aim / focus / research questions / alignment to the foci of the call Name and signature main applicant The Letter of Intent should be submitted in electronic form (PDF format) by to: indonesia-nl@nwo.nl Filling out the application form The application form must be completed in English. For some items on the form, a maximum number of words is stated. Do not exceed this number and fill in the word count. Your application may be disqualified if the maximum number of words stated is exceeded. Applications should be submitted in electronic form (PDF format), by using NWO s digital project- and application system ISAAC that is accessible via Specific guidelines for the electronic submission can be found on Please note that the electronic application must be submitted through the ISAAC account of the main applicant. Please start submitting the application five days prior to the deadline. Explanatory notes to each question on the application form are provided below (the numbers refer to the questions on the application form). A number of details presented in this section should also be completed/copied in the application details for the ISAAC system. These are indicated on the fact sheet. 24

25 1 Title The project title must state the country or countries where the research will be carried out. 2 Project Please indicate the following project details: 2a Focus Specify the focus of the project proposal as outlined in section b Duration Specify the duration of the project expressed in months. Explain why this period is necessary for the execution of your research. This section should not exceed a maximum of 100 words. Please specify the number of words used. 2c Main field(s) of research For all applications it is compulsory to fill out one or more research fields that correspond to the subject of your research proposal. You can only refer to the descriptions and codes from the NWO research field list. Please find the list via: Please select the research field(s) relevant to your research. For example development studies and/or biotechnology. 3 Composition of the project team 3a Consortium Provide the details of the consortium members, i.e. those organisations and persons that carry the responsibility of the project. For Type of organisation indicate if the participating organisation classifies as a Practitioners organisation (A) or a Research organisation (B), and whether it is a private for profit (1), private non-profit (2) or public (3) institution. For instance a company is categorised as A1 and a public funded university as B3. Please note that gender expertise and at least one female is required as consortium partner and/or project staff member. 3b Project staff Provide a list of the project staff members, i.e. personnel to be engaged for carrying out the project of more than 0,4 fte. Provide the name of the staff member and the name and type of the organisation employing the staff member. Furthermore, indicate time involvement by specifying the number of fulltime working months and full time equivalents (fte) over the full project period. Indicate the staff member s role in the project (e.g. researcher, supervisor, local coordinator, advisor etc). Add gender expertise, if applicable. 4 Project approach and track record 4a Consortium: roles and added value Please describe the role and added value of each of the consortium partners in terms of experience, skills, know-how and expertise. If applicable, describe the consortium partners past experience with joint activities. 4b Consortium: recent publications Please provide maximum five key publications per consortium member. 4c CVs of consortium members Please include CVs of all consortium members (max. 1 page each) in the Annex. 25

26 5 Summary of the project proposal Please provide a summary of your proposal. The summary should describe briefly, in no more than 150 words, the opportunity or problem addressed, the main objective, knowledge gaps and approaches. Please note that the summary of the proposal will be published on the website in case of granting. Please specify the number of words used. 6 Description of the project This narrative outline of the project should include the following aspects: 6a Background and rationale Provide a brief analysis and contextualisation of the problem and opportunity addressed. 6b Objectives Specify the project s objectives in terms of its contribution to the main aim and specific objectives of this call and especially its contribution to the selected focus. 6c Research questions, methods Specify the knowledge and research questions to be used as well as a description of the interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary approach and methods. Make clear how the methods allow for a systematic inquiry involving the practical application of science. 6d Description of activities Indicate the activities to be carried out as part of the project. 6e Sustainability after the project Motivate expectations with regard to sustainability of the expected outcome and pathways to a broader local/regional application after the project duration. 6f Timeline of the project Please insert a table/overview which presents a summary of major activities with corresponding timelines for your total project (maximum 1 page A4) The total project description should not exceed a maximum of 2,000 words. Please specify the number of words used. 7 Knowledge sharing and research uptake 7a Stakeholder engagement Include an initial mapping of relevant stakeholders and their role in the project. 7b Capacity development Describe the activities incorporated in the project with the purpose of scientific and stakeholder capacity development. 7c Communication (with stakeholders) Please describe how the consortium intends to engage with stakeholders. Describe the proposed activities and their timeline. Include in this section a description of the planned communication activities, specifying target groups, specific objectives, communication issues and products as well as means of communication. 7d Monitoring and Evaluation Please describe the approach for monitoring and evaluation of research efforts, thereby including efforts for achieving uptake. 26

27 8 Theory of Change & Impact Pathway Theory of Change Please describe in narrative the relationship, logical flow and/or causalities between planned activities, expected results (output), desired changes (outcome) and main objective (contribution to impact). Please complete the impact pathway diagram for the project (max. 1 page). Specify how the project attributes to one or more of the three foci of this call. Use the boxes provided to elaborate on: I. Research objective: the main objective of the research project, in relation to the objectives of the call; II Outputs: the most immediate results of the research project. Research outputs by consortium members can be reckoned as falling under the direct span of control of the project, but does not stop there. III Research outcomes: The external use, adoption or influence of a project s outputs that result in behavioural change of partners and stakeholders needed to achieve the intended impact. Indicate the changes that are expected at the level of the adopters; IV Impact: changes in economic, environmental and social conditions that the project is working toward. 9 Budget overview Please consult section 3.2 of the call for proposals before completing this section. Note that per project the total budget requested from NWO should not exceed 250,000 euro. 9a Total budget Please provide a summary of the total budget by providing an overview of the totals from the itemised detailed budget as requested below, and include the actual expenses incurred for the joint proposal development. Personnel costs List the total number of person years and appointments on a full time basis of postdoc and PhD researchers to be affiliated and supported as a temporary employee at Dutch and LMIC-based institutes, as well as the input of support, junior and senior staff of more than 0,4 fte. Knowledge sharing and research uptake (approximately between 15 and 20 per cent of the requested grant budget, each category should be included): - Stakeholder engagement Present an estimate of the total costs of the project for specific activities to enhance knowledge sharing that do not require research: travelling, durables, consumables and assistance, including an estimate of the costs of specific activities to enhance knowledge sharing among stakeholder. - Capacity development (scientific and stakeholder) Present an estimate of the total costs of the project for specific activities for learning and training: travelling, durables & consumables, expertise needed and other costs. - Communication Present an overview of the cost for communication according to travelling costs, durables & consumables, expertise and other cost. This includes the cost of coordinating and integrating the (scientific and other) participants contributions to the project, costs of contributing to relevant communication and network platforms and the costs of the dissemination and transfer of knowledge. Please note that NWO does not reimburse costs of scientific publications. 27

28 - Monitoring & Evaluation (for project M&E activities and 6,000 euro for the joint workshop and conference) Present the costs related to activities for the purpose of Monitoring & Evaluation, such as documenting progress, consortium and stakeholder meetings (most notably the kick-off and final workshop) to revisit the Theory of Change and Impact Pathway, as well as attendance of the joint kick-off workshop and joint final conference of all the projects financed under this call. Research costs (max 20 per cent of the requested grant budget) Present estimations of the research costs per year and list the budget items according to the following budget lines: travelling costs (including plane tickets for researcher and supervisor(s), travel in the field/the Netherlands and costs of accommodation and travel for short visits); durables (research equipment); consumables, research assistance and other costs. Overhead (max 10 per cent of the requested grant budget) Please specify overhead costs in LMICs, related to conducting activities under b, c and d. List the budget items according to the following budget lines: office space, basic facilities, overheads, depreciation costs; administrative assistance. Amount and source of co-funding (if applicable) Please include in the budget overview the sources, type and the approximate amount of co-funding and be as specific as possible on the purposes of the cofunding. Mention the type of in cash co-funding (e.g. research costs is not sufficiently specific, break this down to: travelling costs, durables, consumables, research assistance and other costs). All relevant information as presented in the cofunding guarantees should be represented in the budget overview. Note that cofunding guarantees in writing must be sent along with the application. 10 Data management Please answer the questions 1-4. This section should not exceed a maximum of 300 words. Please specify the number of words used. Annexes Please attach the following annexes: - CVs (max. 1 page each) of the consortium members (not of the project staff) involved in the application; - Letters of support outlining the availability and commitment of Consortium members, including the valorised co-funding commitment of practitioner organisation(s) (signed by heads of the organisations/departments) (max 2 pages each); The letters of support should be written in English and addressed to the project leader, and not NWO-WOTRO. Information on co-funding should be made explicit in terms of pledged financial or capitalised material or personnel contribution. The amounts presented in letters of support must correspond exactly to the amounts put forward in the budget. After the research proposal has been approved, NWO may ask the private partner for re-confirmation of the co-funding. Letter of support should only be included for the consortium members. - Draft Consortium Agreement (can be unsigned). The format for the Consortium Agreement can be found on the WOTRO website. After the funding is granted for the projects, NWO may advise on patent matters and will assist in finalising contractual arrangements between partners who are entitled to and wish to sign an option agreement or wish to acquire exclusive or non-exclusive commercial rights to IP. 28

29 No other annexes than mentioned above are allowed. Signatures The application must be signed by all members of the consortium, as presented in section 3a, signatures of project staff (3b) are not needed. Faxed, electronic or scanned signatures will be accepted. 29

30 Published by: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) in collaboration with RISTEKDIKTI Visiting address: Laan van Nieuw Oost-Indië CE The Hague The Netherlands March