Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking
|
|
- Adela Chandler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking Report Four October 217
2 Contents On 5 April 217, representatives of over 7 countries, international organisations and civil society came together in Brussels for the Supporting the future of Syria and the region conference (Brussels conference) to build on momentum from the previous London and Kuwait conferences and mobilise funding to respond to the needs of the people affected by the Syria crisis. The EU, Germany, Kuwait, Norway, Qatar, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United Nations (UN) co-chaired this fifth pledging conference for Syria and the region. Multi-year pledges were made for the period and amounted to almost US$1 billion in grants, including US$6 billion for 217 alone. International financial institutions and donors also announced almost US$3 billion in loans. This report summarises progress against pledges made by donors at the Brussels conference to respond to needs in Syria and in the neighbouring refugee-hosting countries Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt. This is the fourth report in a series which tracks financial contributions against pledges made in 216 and 217 in response to the Syria crisis. This report presents an overview of the pledges made in April at the Brussels conference and a breakdown of grant and loan contributions as of 29 September 217. Information was gathered directly from donors, and supplemented by Brussels conference documentation and data from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) s Financial Tracking Service (FTS). A glossary of the terms used throughout is given at the end of the report, as are details of the data sources and methodology employed. 1. Overview 3 2. Progress by recipient 4 3. In focus: Donor contributions to Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey as well as inside Syria 7 4. Progress by donor 1 5. Contributions by sector Contributions by channel of delivery UN-coordinated appeals 16 Annex 1: Glossary 18 Annex 2: Data sources and methodology 2 Endnotes 21 2
3 1. Overview 1. Overview At the Brussels conference, donors pledged a total of US$9.7 billion in grants for the four-year period : US$6. billion for 217 and US$3.7 billion for the following three years. 1 By the end of the third quarter of 217, just over 88% of the pledge total for the year has been met, 2 with contributions of US$5.3 billion. At present, contributions remain US$.7 billion short of the pledges made at the conference in April 217. A further US$1.6 billion in grants has been contributed 3 for the upcoming three years, representing 43% of forwardlooking pledges met. Combined, this means that six months on from the Brussels conference, 71% of grants pledges for the period have been met, with contributions of US$6.9 billion. 4 As some donors budget allocations are yet to be finalised and some may have different disbursement and reporting cycles, further details on planned contributions for 217 and the remaining period are yet to be made available. In terms of loans, US$3 billion was pledged at the Brussels conference for the period, of which US$2.3 billion was on concessional terms. The data reported so far shows that donors have made available 14% of the total loans pledged, totalling US$4.3 billion and including at least US$864 million that is concessional in nature. However, full details on the terms of concessionality of specific loans are not yet available. 5 FIGURE 1.1: Funding contributed against funding pledged, a) grants 217, b) grants , c) loans US$ BILLIONS Pledges Contributions Grants 217 Grants Loans Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217, the Co-chair s declaration annex: fundraising and UN OCHA s FTS. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: Pledges represent those reported at the time of the Brussels conference and do not include subsequent revisions or additions. Total pledges may differ from the sum of pledges when disaggregated by recipient country. Where available, figures provided directly to Development Initiatives were used for calculating contributions; otherwise, FTS data has been used. The pledges reported in original currencies have been converted to US$ using the UN s Operational Rates as of 1 April 217. Contributions reported in original currencies have been converted to US$ using a 217 average of the UN s Operational Rates. Contributions refer to the sum of all funds reported as committed, contracted and disbursed see glossary. Contributions for are based on data provided by donors in 217 on contributions known at that time. Data is partial and preliminary. 3
4 2. Progress by recipient 2. Progress by recipient Grant contributions reported by donors totalled US$5.3 billion by the end of September 217. The majority of these contributions (63%) have gone to the responses in Syria, Turkey and Lebanon combined. A quarter (25%) has been directed to the response in Syria alone, equating to US$1.3 billion. So far in 217, the response in Turkey has received US$1.1 billion, in Lebanon US$894 million and in Jordan US$692 million. The remaining country-allocated contributions have been delivered to the response in Iraq (US$38 million) and Egypt (US$31 million). It is likely that responses in these countries have received more funding directly, but exact quantities are unknown due to the way in which funding is reported to the regional response or without a specified country. Just under a fifth (17%) of contributions were reported without country allocable detail; of these US$612 million has been reported as multi-country and US$221 million has been directed to the regional response. Where contributions to a country exceed original pledges, this may be due to a lack of disaggregated pledge data or the original pledge not specifying a destination country. FIGURE 2.1: Grant contributions against pledges by recipient country, 217 3, 2,5 Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed Unmet pledges 12% 88% 2,634 2, Contributions 1,5 1, 5 1, ,98 1, Turkey Syria Lebanon Jordan Iraq Egypt Multicountry Region Not defined Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: Data is partial and preliminary. Not defined includes a portion of funding where data by recipient country was not specified bilaterally by donors. Some data in this chart has been shown as committed because it is not yet known how much has been contracted and disbursed to each recipient country. Where contributions to a country exceed original pledges, this may be because of a lack of country-specific pledges at the time of the conference or a lack of disaggregated pledge data reported as part of this exercise. 4
5 2. Progress by recipient FIGURE 2.2: Grant contributions against pledges by recipient country, ,5 Unmet pledges 2, Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed 57% 43% 2,196 Contributions 1,5 1, Jordan Lebanon Syria Iraq Turkey Egypt Multi-country Region Not defined Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217. Notes: Data is partial and preliminary. Not defined includes a portion of funding where data on recipient country was not specified bilaterally by donors. So far, donors have reported US$1.6 billion in grants for the period. More than a fifth (21%) of these forward-looking contributions have been directed towards the response in Jordan (US$345 million). Furthermore, of the total, 12% will go towards the response inside Syria (US$194 million); 12% has been contributed to the response in Lebanon (US$194 million); 5% has been contributed to the response in each of Turkey (US$77 million) and Iraq (US$75 million), 6 and less than 1% to that in Egypt (US$1.5 million). defined accounting for 39% of total contributions (US$634 million) for the period. Where contributions to a country exceed original pledges, this again may be due to a lack of disaggregated pledge data or the original pledge not specifying a destination country. While some donors may have made allocations specifically for 218, the majority of funds so far are only confirmed for the window, with the year(s) not specified. Almost half (45%) of forwardlooking contributions do not yet specify a recipient country, with not 5
6 2. Progress by recipient A total of US$3 billion in loans to refugee-hosting countries in the region was pledged at the Brussels conference for the period. Recipient details have not yet been provided for 7% of loan pledges made at the conference (US$2.9 billion), where this detail has been provided the majority has been reported as region and less than 1% of all pledges have been directed towards Jordan and Lebanon (.2%). Donors have so far reported US$4.3 billion in loans in 217, of which the response in Turkey received the most (US$1.5 billion) at 36% of total loan contributions; followed by that in Lebanon (US$1.1 billion, 25%), Egypt (US$93 million, 21%) and Jordan (US$531 million, 12%). A further US$262 million has been made available by donors, but the recipients are yet to be defined. No loan contributions have been reported for the response in Syria or Iraq. Loan concessionality can be defined as the benefit to the borrower when compared with a loan at market rate (see glossary). According to the data available, 2% of the loans contributed so far in 217 were made on a concessional basis (US$864 million). A further 22% were made on non-concessional terms (US$965 million) with the terms and levels of concessionality of the remaining loans (US$2.5 billion) still to be defined. FIGURE 2.3: Loan contributions against pledges by recipient country, , 2, 15, 1, 5, Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed 9, , , ,889 Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217. Notes: Contributions refers to 217 only, data is not yet available for the period Region Jordan Lebanon Turkey Egypt Not defined FIGURE 2.4: Loan contributions against pledges by recipient country, by loan concessionality, , 2, 15, 1, Pledges Concessional contributions Non-concessional contributions Unspecified contributions 9,23 2,889 5, 1,541 1, Egypt Turkey Lebanon Jordan Region Not defined Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217. Notes: Contributions data is for 217 only; data is not yet available for the period. 6
7 3. In focus: Donor contributions to Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey and Syria 3. In focus: Donor contributions to Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey as well as inside Syria Total contributions to the response in Jordan have reached US$1.2 billion so far in 217: US$692 million (57%) in grants and US$531 million (43%) in loans. Germany is the largest grant contributor, providing US$222 million so far in 217, followed by EU institutions (US$99 million), and the UK (US$86 million). Further to these grant contributions; the World Bank has provided US$2 million in loans to the response in Jordan, followed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (US$178 million) and Italy (US$145 million). FIGURE 3.1: Grant and loan contributions to Jordan, by donor, Grants Loans Germany EU institutions UK Canada Japan Netherlands UAE US Norway Australia Italy Switzerland France Belgium Czech Republic Spain World Bank Denmark Austria Qatar Luxembourg Estonia Finland Ireland Slovenia China World Bank EBRD Italy Netherlands EIB Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: EBRD: European Bank of Reconstruction and Development; EIB: European Investment Bank; UAE: United Arab Emirates; UK: United Kingdom; US: United States. 7
8 3. In focus: Donor contributions to Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey and Syria FIGURE 3.2: Grant and loan contributions to Lebanon, by donor, Grants Loans Germany EU institutions UK US Canada Norway Netherlands Italy Japan Switzerland Australia France Belgium UAE Ireland Finland Hungary Spain China Denmark Austria Czech Republic Estonia Iceland Luxembourg Slovenia EIB World Bank Italy Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Donor contributions to the response in Lebanon amount to US$2. billion, with US$1.1 billion (55%) delivered in the form of loans, of which the European Investment Bank (EIB) contributed over half (US$571 million). The remaining US$894 million (45%) was provided in grants; for which the largest donors were Germany (US$39 million), EU institutions (US$154 million) and the UK (US$133 million). Contributions to the response in Turkey have reached US$2.6 billion so far in 217 (see Figure 3.3 on the following page); the majority of which (58%) has been provided in the form of loans. Almost half (49%) of loan contributions came from the EIB, contributing US$761 million so far. 8
9 3. In focus: Donor contributions to Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey and Syria A further US$1.1 billion was directed to the response in Turkey in the form of grants; the EU institutions are so far the largest grant donor to Turkey, providing US$659 million (6% of grant contributions). A large part of the contributions to Turkey from the EU institutions are provided through the EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey. 7 The next largest contributors are the UK (US$156 million) and Germany (US$14 million). FIGURE 3.3: Grant and loan contributions to Turkey, by donor, Grants Loans By the end of September 217, donors had provided US$1.3 billion in contributions to fund the response within Syria. So far, Germany has provided the largest share (29%), contributing US$385 million, followed by the UK (16%, US$214 million) and Norway (13%, US$171 million). Based on available data, no loans have so far been pledged or reported to Syria for 217 or for the period. 2 1 EU institutions UK Germany Denmark Austria Japan US Finland Norway Belgium Romania Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Bulgaria Netherlands Hungary Lithuania Canada Switzerland France Slovenia Luxembourg China Iceland Estonia EIB 97 World Bank EBRD FIGURE 3.4: Grant contributions to Syria, by donor, Germany UK Norway EU institutions 77 Japan 71 Canada 48 US 34 Switzerland 28 Netherlands Qatar Italy 12 Finland 11 Australia Belgium France Hungary UAE Kuwait Spain Denmark Czech Republic Austria Ireland China Luxembourg Iceland Latvia Bulgaria Malta Korea Estonia Slovenia Lithuania Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September
10 4. Progress by donor 4. Progress by donor The Brussels conference donors have contributed US$5.3 billion so far in 217 against their pledges to Syria and the region, according to available data. This includes funds reported as committed, contracted and disbursed. 8 Of the 42 conference grant donors, 2 have made contributions in 217 for as much as or more than they pledged in April at the Brussels conference. 9 FIGURE 4.1: Grant contributions against pledges by donor, 217 Germany 1, EU institutions 1, UK US Canada Norway Japan Netherlands NGO Consortium Kuwait Qatar France Sweden UAE Switzerland Denmark Italy All other donors Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217, the Co-chairs declaration annex: fundraising and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: The World Bank and the EBRD did not pledge any grants at the Brussels conference but are included in this chart as they subsequently made grant contributions. Where data was unavailable from donors, the FTS voluntary reporting mechanism was used. FTS data primarily captures humanitarian funding and more funding may have been contributed to the region that is not recorded on FTS. FTS data is used for China, France, Korea, Kuwait, Malta and Qatar. Australia and Italy have met their 217 pledges; this is not visible in the chart or table due to differences in exchange rate conversions to US$ of the pledges and contributions , 1,2 1,4 1
11 4. Progress by donor TABLE 4.1: All other donors, US$ millions Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed Contributed % met Australia % Belgium % Finland % China % EBRD Ireland % Austria % Portugal % Korea % Hungary % Czech Republic % Luxembourg % Spain % World Bank Poland % Slovakia % Bulgaria % Lithuania % Estonia % Iceland % Liechtenstein % Croatia % Romania ,755% Latvia % Malta % Cyprus ,183% Slovenia ,462% EU member states and EU institutions total 4, , , % 11
12 4. Progress by donor For the period, US$3.7 billion was pledged by donors at the conference. Of the 42 conference grant donors, 26 made pledges for beyond 217. Almost three-quarters (73%) of the forwardlooking pledges were made by Germany, the UK, EU institutions and Norway, totalling US$2.7 billion. So far, Germany has provided the largest amount of forward-looking funding, at US$783 million, followed by the UK (US$628 million) and Australia (US$85 million). Some donors such as the EU institutions have not yet delivered on their pledges beyond 217 because of the annuality of their budget cycles. FIGURE 4.2: Grant contributions against pledges by donor, Germany UK EU institutions Norway Canada Australia NGO Consortium Sweden Kuwait All other donors Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed , TABLE 4.2: All other donors, US$ millions Pledged Committed Contracted Contributed % met France % Italy % Netherlands % Luxembourg % Switzerland % Austria % Finland % Iceland % Czech Republic % Hungary % Bulgaria % Lithuania % Estonia % Croatia % Romania % Slovenia % Liechtenstein % EU member states and EU institutions total 2, ,36 1,472 6% Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217, the Co-chair s declaration annex: fundraising and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: Due to variations in the exchange rate to US$ since the time of the Brussels conference, some donors are recorded as marginally exceeding their pledge. 12
13 4. Progress by donor Multilateral development banks have so far provided the overwhelming majority of loan contributions, (95%, US$4.1 billion). The remaining 5% have been provided by Italy and the Netherlands. The EIB has contributed the largest volume of loans so far for the period, providing US$2.5 billion (58% of total contributions). It is possible that more loans have been contributed, but not yet reported. Of the US$3 billion in loans pledged at the Brussels conference, US$2.3 billion was pledged on concessional terms. Full details of pledged and contributed loans from the multilateral development banks, including their degree of concessionality and timeframes, are still to be finalised. Based on available data so far on contributions, the World Bank has provided the largest volume of concessional loans; contributing US$67 million, followed by Italy, who has committed US$194 million in concessional loans. FIGURE 4.3: Loan contributions against pledges by donor, EIB EBRD World Bank Italy Netherlands ,332 1, ,56 14,51 Pledged Committed Contracted Disbursed 2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 12, 14, 16, Source: Development Initiatives based data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and the Co-chairs declaration annex: fundraising. Notes: Pledge data is taken from the conference annex. Some Brussels conference loan pledges may include a portion of those at the London conference. Contributions refer to 217 only; no contributions data is yet available for the period. The pledged amounts for EBRD refer to countries of operation that have experienced refugee influx; committed amount refer directly to EBRD refugee response. This chart only includes donors that have reported contributions and does not include all donors who made loan pledges at the Brussels conference. FIGURE 4.4: Loan contributions against pledges by donor, by loan concessionality, EIB 2,497 14,51 EBRD 276 8,56 World Bank Italy Netherlands Pledges Concessional contributions Non-concessional contributions Unspecified contributions 2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 12, 14, 16, Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and the Co-chair s declaration annex: fundraising. Notes: Pledge data is taken from the conference annex. Some Brussels conference loan pledges may include a portion of those made at the London conference. Contributions refer to 217 only; no contributions data is yet available for the period. The pledged amounts for EBRD refer to countries of operation that experienced refugee influx; committed amounts refer directly to EBRD refugee response. This chart only includes donors that have reported contributions and does not include all donors who made loans pledges at the Brussels conference. 13
14 5. Contributions by sector 5. Contributions by sector FIGURE 5.1: Grant contributions by sector, 217 Social and cultural infrastructure US$119m Shelter and non-food items US$172m Remaining sectors under US$1m US$25m Other US$25m Water and sanitation US$16m Multi-sector US$1,178m Economic recovery and infrastructure (including agriculture, mine action and livelihoods) US$749m Protection/human rights/ rule of law US$274m Food US$641m Health US$343m Not yet specified US$379m Education US$462m Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: Remaining sectors under US$1m includes: coordination and support services (US$96 million), governance and civil society (US$47 million), unearmarked (US$44 million) and general budget support (US$18 million). For more than a third (US$1.9 billion) of grant contributions in 217 to date, there is no sectoral detail available. Around two-thirds of those funds (US$1.2 billion) are multisectoral, 14% (US$25 million) are towards sectors other than those listed in Annex 2, 2% (US$44 million) are unearmarked contributions and the remaining 2% (US$379 million) have not been assigned to a sector yet or the information was not provided. Where sector information is available, most grant contributions have gone towards economic recovery and infrastructure, which also includes agriculture, mine action and livelihoods (25%, US$749 million). The food and education sectors have received 21% (US$641 million) and 15% (US$462 million) of the total specified grant contributions respectively. Of the loan contributions with sectoral information, more FIGURE 5.2: Loan contributions by sector, 217 Transport and ICT 7% Energy and extractives 8.7% Finance and markets 1% Health, nutrition and population 16%.2% Economic recovery and infrastructure (including agriculture, mine action and livelihoods) 35% Macro and fiscal management 22% Social, urban, rural and resilience Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217. Notes: Data is partial and preliminary as full details on sector disaggregation are not available. than a third (35%, US$1 billion) have targeted macro and fiscal management. A further US$633 million (22%) has gone towards the social, urban, rural and resilience sector, while US$47 million (16%) has been directed to health, nutrition and population. 14
15 6. Contributions by channel of delivery 6. Contributions by channel of delivery FIGURE 6.1: Grant contributions by channel of delivery to Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt, % Other channels of delivery UN agencies 53% 13% NGOs 3.5% RCRC 1.3% Government institutions.9% Private sector Source: Development Initiatives based on data provided bilaterally by donors in 217 and UN OCHA FTS data. Data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: NGOs: non-governmental organisations; RCRC: International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. In the first three-quarters of 217, more than half of grant contributions have been channelled through UN agencies (53%, US$2.6 billion). A further 13% or US$627 million was channelled directly to NGOs and 3.5% or US$173 million by member organisations of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Partner country governments and the private sector received US$65 million (1.3%) and US$41 million (.9%) respectively. Close to US$1.4 billion (29%) of grant contributions went towards other channels of delivery, which include the EU-managed Facility for Refugees in Turkey as well as other financial institutions, funds and organisations for which no detail is available. 15
16 7. UN-coordinated appeals 7. UN-coordinated appeals The Syria Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) responds to the humanitarian needs within Syria throughout 217 across a number of sectors. A second appeal, the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan (3RP) covers protection and humanitarian needs as well as aiming to strengthen resilience in the neighbouring countries of Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. As of September 217, the aggregate funding towards these two appeals amounted to US$3.5 billion, leaving a funding gap of US$4.5 billion. The coverage for the Syria HRP and the 3RP appeals was at 37% and 49% respectively. 1 Since 1 July, the 3RP recorded a significant increase in coverage, amounting to US$2.3 billion (up by 26 percentage points); the remaining funding gap was US$2.4 billion. Over the same period, a further 8% of the HRP has been covered, with contributions amounting to US$1.2 billion, and unmet requirements remaining at US$2.1 billion. By the start of October 217, twothirds of the combined appeals requirements were left unmet. According to UN OCHA FTS, total commitments/contributions outside the two Syria-specific UN appeals stood at US$1.4 billion. FIGURE 7.1: Requirements and contributions for Syria-related UN-coordinated appeals, 217 5, 4,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 3,351 2,12 37% 4,633 2,357 2,276 49% % of requirements met Unmet requirements Requirements met 1, 5 1,232 Syria HRP 217 Syria 3RP 217 Source: Development Initiatives based on UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) 3RP Interagency Funding snapshot as of 11 October and UN OCHA FTS data. FTS data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: The US$4.6 billion requirement is the original 3RP requirements figure. This does not include US$943 million in multi-year funds. Further details on contributions for the US$943 million figure are not currently available. For more information see UNHCR s Regional Overview. 16
17 7. UN-coordinated appeals Of the funds reported outside the appeals to UN OCHA FTS, 57% (US$85 million) have been directed to the response in Turkey and close to a quarter (23%, US$322 million) to Syria. Of the total contributions towards the Syria crisis both inside and outside the UN appeals, just less than a third (32%, US$1.6 billion) have gone to the response in Syria and almost a quarter (US$1.1 billion) to that in Turkey. 12 A number of reasons may explain the volumes of funding recorded outside UN-coordinated appeals. The appeals do not cover all needs or include all agencies; some implementing organisations are part of the UN appeal framework; and large funding envelopes may be recorded outside appeals initially and those records may be amended retrospectively and logged against appeal requirements once partners are contracted and information is reported in detail to FTS. Additionally, and more broadly, not all the pledges delivered following the Brussels conference contributed towards UN-coordinated appeals, notably because the protracted nature of the crisis and the associated complex response saw a range of financing instruments, delivery channels and implementation modalities used by donors. The EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey is just one example of this. Some of them, however, did support the priority sectors identified in the appeals. FIGURE 7.2: Funding inside and outside the Syria-related UN-coordinated appeals, by country, 217 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 3, ,232 Inside appeals , Outside appeals Source: Development Initiatives based on UNHCR 3RP Interagency Funding snapshot as of 11 October and UN OCHA FTS data. FTS data downloaded 27 September 217. Notes: Contribution figures may not match data provided bilaterally by donors. Regional funding includes contributions that have not yet been allocated to a specific country, both in and outside appeals. Some of these contributions may be attributed to a specific destination country once more detail becomes available. The US$4.6 billion requirement is the original 3RP requirements figure. This figure does not include US$943 million in multi-year funds. Further details on contributions for the US$943 million figure are not currently available. For more information see UNHCR s Regional Overview Egypt Iraq Turkey Jordan Lebanon Region Syria 17
18 Annex 1: Glossary Annex 1: Glossary TERM DEFINITION Commitment Contract Contributions Disbursement A firm plan expressed in writing and backed by the necessary funds, carried out by an official donor to provide specified assistance to a recipient country government, organisation or implementing agency. In this report, commitments refer to funds that have been committed but not yet contracted or disbursed. A binding agreement signed between a donor and a recipient implementing institution, organisation or agency to implement an action. Funds can then be disbursed on this basis. In the context of this report, contracted funding refers to those funds which have been contracted but not yet disbursed. For the purpose of this report, contributions is used as a general term to refer to the sum of all funds reported as committed, contracted and disbursed. Outgoing funds that are transferred to a recipient institution, organisation or agency, following a commitment and/ or a contract. In this report, disbursements refer to funds disbursed from the donor to the first level recipient, not to the funds which are ultimately spent at the project level. Grant Funding for which no repayment is required. Loans Loan concessionality level Loans concessional Loans non-concessional Multi-country Funding for which the recipient incurs a legal debt. The concessionality level of a loan reflects the benefit to the borrower compared with a loan at market rate. Concessional loans benefits can include a lower interest rate, a longer period in which the loan has to be repaid or a delay to when the repayment has to begin. The World Bank s concessional loans typically meet International Development Association equivalent lending terms, which carry no or low interest rates. If a loan is highly concessional, it will typically have a grant element of at least 35% with a discount rate of 5%. The World Bank s non-concessional loans will typically be based on the International Bank for Reconstruction And Development (IBRD) s marketbased rates. Pledges and funding labelled as multi-country in this report refer to instances where funding is directed (or will be directed) to two or more (but not all) specified countries in the Syria region. This differs from pledges and funding labelled as going to the region, which is specified as funding for the regional response by donors and may go to all countries in the region; as well as not defined, which refers to pledges and funding where no country or regional detail has been provided. 18
19 Annex 1: Glossary TERM Multi-sector Multilateral development banks Pledge Recipient country Region Unearmarked UN-coordinated appeals DEFINITION In the context of sectoral disaggregation of grants and for the purposes of this report, multi-sector refers primarily to projects and activities with no one dominant sector, and often applies to assistance for refugees provided and/or coordinated by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). This definition is in line with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee s (IASC) sectoral definitions. Multilateral development banks (MDBs) are supranational institutions established by a group of countries with the common task of fostering economic and social progress in developing countries by financing projects (in the form of loans or grants), supporting investment, generating capital and providing technical expertise. A non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by donors. Here, pledges refer to those made at the London Conference. The report includes analysis of pledges and funding by recipient country. This includes direct funding to the governments of recipient countries, as well as funding channelled through organisations working in the country, such as the UN, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (RCRC) and the private sector. In the context of the London Conference, this refers to Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. In this report, unearmarked refers to funding that is deliberately not directed to any particular sector by the donor. This differs from sector not specified where details of sector-specific allocation are not available from the reports provided by the donors. Humanitarian response plans and appeals, usually coordinated by UNOCHA or UNHCR, through which national, regional and international relief systems mobilise to respond to selected major or complex emergencies that require a system-wide response to humanitarian crises. Not all international humanitarian organisations take part in UN-coordinated appeal processes, notably ICRC and Médecins Sans Frontières do not. 19
20 Annex 2: Data sources and methodology Annex 2: Data sources and methodology Information on pledges by donor has been taken from the Co-chair s declaration - annex: fundraising. Supporting the future of Syria and the region (Brussels, 5 April 217). 14 Subsequent pledges, or significant revisions to the volume or distribution of pledges made after the Brussels conference have not been included in this analysis. Additional disaggregated data on pledges and contributions by recipient country, by year, by sector or by channel of delivery was gathered directly from donors in 217 using an online form (shown on the next page). Breakdowns of current levels of contributed funding are provided using data shared directly by donors via the same form wherever possible. Where data was unavailable from donors, data reported to UN OCHA s FTS voluntary reporting mechanism was used. The allocation of contributions by year for the period is likely to change as further data becomes available. The data presented in the report is in current prices. The pledges reported in original currencies have been converted to US$ using the UN s Operational Rates as of 1st April 217. Where figures in US$ were available in the Conference Annex, these were used as such. Contributions reported in original currencies have been converted to US$ using a 217 average of the UN s Operational Rates. UN appeal information is taken from UNHCR funding snapshots for the Syria Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan 217 and from UN OCHA s FTS for the Syria Humanitarian Response Plan 217. Pledges and contributions to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey are included in figures for Turkey and not shown separately as in previous reports. These funds are recorded under multi-sector and other channels of delivery. Analysis of grant sectors in the report uses sector classifications that are specific to this tracking project. The classification of sectors is informed by the OECD Development Assistance Committee sectors and purpose codes, the IASC 15 standard sectors, and sector classifications used by specific government and multilateral donors. The sector classification seeks to align different sector classifications to the fullest extent possible under the following headings: Education Health Water and sanitation Governance and civil society Social and cultural infrastructure Economic recovery and infrastructure (including agriculture, mine action and livelihoods) General budget support Food Coordination and support services Protection/human rights/rule of law Shelter and non-food items Multi-sector Unearmarked Not yet specified. Volumes of funding that do not fall under any of these sector categories are combined into other. In addition, sectoral classifications of loans include the World Bank sectors macro and fiscal management, transport and information and communication technologies, energy and extractives, social, urban, rural resilience and finance and markets. 2
21 POST-BRUSSELS CONFERENCE FINANCIAL TRACKING: REPORT FOUR Endnotes Endnotes 2 Pledge met means it has been committed, contracted or disbursed. Grants total for 217 includes US$33 million in contributions from the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development combined; neither of these donors made grants pledges at the Brussels conference. 3 This report uses contributions to refer to the sum of all funds reported as committed, contracted and disbursed. Forward-looking funding uses the same term, but in general only refers to funding that has been committed or contracted as disbursements for future years are yet to be made. 4 See note 2. 5 Loan terms are generally negotiated on a case-by-case basis and 6 may be needed to facilitate better reporting. way in which contributions are reported to Development Initiatives and a reduction in the level of detail provided. 7 The EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey is a coordinating mechanism for the mobilisation of EU assistance to refugees in Turkey. It ensures as humanitarian assistance or not, to ensure that the needs of refugees and host communities are addressed in a comprehensive and coordinated manner. It coordinates a 3 billion budget to be contracted in This is made up of 1 billion from the EU budget and 2 billion in additional funding from member states. Their contributions are made directly to the EU General Budget in the form of external assigned revenue pursuant to Article 21(2) (b) of the EU Financial Regulation. An overview of member states contributions to the Facility is available at: europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/216/2/3-refugee-facility-forturkey/. For more information on the EU Facility see: migration_en 9 This includes Australia and Italy; due to exchange rate variations, contributions fall marginally short of the pledge. 1 See data sources and methodology (Annex 2) for sources of UN appeal data. Funding updates for the Syria 3RP 217 appeal are available at: 11 Continuously updated funding information is available at: 12 Contributions inside the 3RP appeal are sourced from UNHCR data. Contributions inside the Syria HRP and outside appeals are sourced from FTS. 13 See note pdf/syriaconf217-pledging-statement_pdf/ 15 The IASC is the primary mechanism for inter-agency coordination of humanitarian assistance involving key UN and non-un humanitarian partners.
Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking
Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking Report Five April 218 Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking, April 218 On 5 April 217,
More informationSupporting Syria and the region: Post-London conference financial tracking
Supporting Syria and the region: Post-London conference financial tracking Report Two February 2017 Contents One year ago, on 4 February 2016, 48 donors gathered in London for the Supporting Syria and
More informationTUITION FEE GUIDANCE FOR ERASMUS+ EXCHANGE STUDENTS Academic Year
TUITION FEE GUIDANCE FOR ERASMUS+ EXCHANGE STUDENTS 2017-2018 Academic Year CONTENTS Page no. Summary 3 1 Introduction 4 2 UK/EU New Regime Fee Students 4 3 International Student Fees 5 4 Erasmus+ Grants
More informationFirst quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%
94/2014-17 June 2014 First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6% Today, Eurostat publishes for the first time a News Release with quarterly data on the job vacancy rate.
More informationUnmet health care needs statistics
Unmet health care needs statistics Statistics Explained Data extracted in January 2018. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database. Planned article update: March 2019. An
More informationNATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities
NATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities Eric Deschambault, Vice-Chair, AC/326 SG5, Logistic Storage and Disposal RASR Workshop - November 2010
More informationECHA Helpdesk Support to National Helpdesks
ECHA Helpdesk Support to National Helpdesks 48 th Biocides CA meeting 19-21 September 2012 Brussels Dr. Henna Piha ECHA Helpdesk Unit A1 ECHA Helpdesk - Support to National Helpdesks What ECHA offers to
More informationInformation Erasmus Erasmus+ Grant for Study and/or Internship Abroad
Information Erasmus+ 2017-2018 Erasmus+ Grant for Study and/or Internship Abroad INTERNATIONAL OFFICE 15 MAY 2017 Table of contents GENERAL INFORMATION 1 1. FOR WHOM? 2 2. TERMS 2 3. PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES
More informationEUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation
DLR-PT.de Chart 1 EUREKA / Eurostars Dr. Paul Racec 18 th May 2017 EUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation DLR-PT - National Contact Point EUREKA/Eurostars Dr. Paul Racec DLR-PT.de
More informationThe EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan
EUREKA The EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan Brussels, 12 March 2014 Susanne Madders Senior International Cooperation Advisor EUREKA Secretariat,
More informationGuidelines. STEP travel grants. steptravelgrants.eu
Guidelines STEP travel grants steptravelgrants.eu STEP travel grants STEP stands for Supporting Travel for Engaged Partnerships. The STEP travel grants funding programme has been initiated and managed
More informationInternational Credit Mobility Call for Proposals 2018
International Credit Mobility Call for Proposals 2018 Information Day National Office in Palestine Dr. Amir Khalil/BZU Venue: Ramallah/ Grand Park Hotel Gaza/ Islamic University November 8 th, 2017 1 What
More informationHEALTH CARE NON EXPENDITURE STATISTICS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate F: Social statistics Unit F-5: Education, health and social protection DOC 2016-PH-08 HEALTH CARE NON EXPENDITURE STATISTICS 2016 AND 2017 DATA COLLECTIONS In 2010,
More informationThe EU ICT Sector and its R&D Performance. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 The EU ICT sector and its R&D performance
The EU ICT Sector and its R&D Performance Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 The EU ICT sector and its R&D performance The ICT sector value added amounted to EUR 632 billion in 2015. ICT services
More informationPUBLIC. 6393/18 NM/fh/jk DGC 1C LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6393/18 LIMITE
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6393/18 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject: LIMITE PUBLIC CORLX 98 CFSP/PESC 169 CSDP/PSDC 83 FIN 145 COUNCIL DECISION
More informationInternational Credit mobility
International Credit mobility Call for Proposals Deadline :1 February 2018 Amer Helwani Erasmus+ Office - Lebanon A streamlined architecture: 3 Key Actions A single integrated programme KA1 Learning Mobility
More informationErasmus + Call for proposals Key Action 2 Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (I)
Erasmus + Key Action 2 Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (I) Call for proposals 2017 Piia Heinämäki Erasmus+ Info Day, Tashkent 8-9.11.2016 1 OUTLINE Capacity Building in Higher Education
More informationOPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA
OPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA STATUS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE OPCW-UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA As of 31 July 2014 BACKGROUND The OPCW-UN Joint Mission was established on 16 October 2013, in order to support,
More informationErasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Piia Heinämäki Erasmus+ Info Day, Lviv Erasmus+
Work together with European higher education institutions Piia Heinämäki Info Day, Lviv 21.10.2016 What is? The EU's programme to support education, training youth and sport Funding for programmes, projects
More informationErasmus+ Benefits for Erasmus+ Students
Erasmus+ Erasmus+ is the European Union s new funding program for education and vocational training, youth and sport. Erasmus+ enables you to complete part of your studies at one of the partner higher
More informationErasmus Student Work Placement Guide
Erasmus Student Work Placement Guide Introduction This Guide is intended to provide general information for students who are considering an Erasmus work placement. It must be stressed that the advice is
More informationA European workforce for call centre services. Construction industry recruits abroad
4 A European workforce for call centre services An information technology company in Ireland decided to use the EURES services to help recruit staff from the European labour market for its call centre
More informationBRIDGING GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2018
BRIDGING GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2018 1. Introduction Bridging Grants are a program of assistance that target early stage proof of concept and knowledge transfer, product and services development and
More informationErasmus + ( ) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka
Erasmus + (2014-2020) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka What is Erasmus+? The EU's programme to support education, training youth and sport Combines 7 EU education,
More informationCall for Proposals 2012
Call for Proposals 2012 Publication reference: Ref: ALF/CFP/2012/MT1 Anna Lindh Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue between Cultures Aim of the Call In line with the ALF strategic framework
More informationSOUTH AFRICA EUREKA INFORMATION SESSION 13 JUNE 2013 How to Get involved in EUROSTARS
EUREKA SOUTH AFRICA EUREKA INFORMATION SESSION 13 JUNE 2013 How to Get involved in EUROSTARS Michel Andrieu Adviser to the Head of the EUREKA Secretariat Doing business through technology The Eurostars
More information2011 Call for proposals Non-State Actors in Development. Delegation of the European Union to Russia
2011 Call for proposals Non-State Actors in Development Delegation of the European Union to Russia Generally: to promote inclusive and empowered society in partner countries by supporting actions of local
More informationTeaching Staff Mobility (STA)
Teaching Staff Mobility (STA) The Erasmus+ Teaching Staff Mobility (STA) programme provides a framework and financial support for staff at the University of Reading to teach at another European Higher
More informationOPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA
OPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA STATUS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE OPCW-UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA As of 31January 2014 BACKGROUND Following the implementation of decision EC-M-33.DEC.1 of the Executive Council
More informationEUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17
peter.lalvani@eurekanetwork.org EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17 EUREKA is Leading platform for international cooperation Intergovernmental network Supporting
More informationITU Statistical Activities
ITU Statistical Activities Korea National Statistical Office (NSO) and Ministry of Commerce, Industry & Energy (MOCIE) 16 June 2004, Geneva Esperanza C. Magpantay Market, Economics and Finance Unit (MEF)
More informationERA-Can+ twinning programme Call text
ERA-Can+ twinning programme Call text About ERA-Can+ ERA-Can+ promotes cooperation between the European Union (EU) and Canada across the science, technology and innovation chain to support and encourage
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.7.2016 COM(2016) 449 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on implementation of Regulation (EC) No 453/2008 of the European Parliament
More informationERASMUS+ INTERNSHIP MOBILITY?
ERASMUS+ INTERNSHIP MOBILITY? Tuesday, March 21 5.20 pm Nador 13, 307/A WHAT IS ERASMUS+ Internship Mobility? 2 12 months many organizations in Programme Countries non-eligible receiving institutions:
More informationCapacity Building in the field of youth
Capacity Building in the field of youth What are the aims of a Capacity-building project? Youth Capacity-building projects aim to: foster cooperation and exchanges in the field of youth between Programme
More informationHORIZON 2020 Instruments and Rules for Participation. Elena Melotti (Warrant Group S.r.l.) MENFRI March 04th 2015
HORIZON 2020 Instruments and Rules for Participation Elena Melotti (Warrant Group S.r.l.) MENFRI March 04th 2015 Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation Three main objectives: Innovation Simplification Coherence
More informationAPPLICATION FORM ERASMUS TEACHING ASSIGNMENT (STA)
APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS TEACHING ASSIGNMENT (STA) Ansökan Erasmus Lärarutbyte 2017-2019 Funds are granted continuously throughout the year until all available funds have been allocated. The application
More informationEUREKA An Exceptional Opportunity to extend Canadian company reach to Europe, Israel and South Korea
EUREKA An Exceptional Opportunity to extend Canadian company reach to Europe, Israel and South Korea Johannes Larsen Innovation Network Advisor, NRC/IRAP 2013 EUREKA: 25+ years of R&D Support EUREKA is:
More informationErasmus+ Capacity Building for Higher Education. Erasmus+
Capacity Building for Higher Education Where to find CBHE in A single integrated programme 1. Learning Mobility 2. 3. Erasmus Co-operation Projects + Policy Support Specific activities: Jean Monnet Sport
More informationAn action plan to boost research and innovation
MEMO/05/66 Brussels, 1 October 005 An action plan to boost research and innovation The European Commission has tabled an integrated innovation and research action plan, which calls for a major upgrade
More informationAPPLICATION FORM ERASMUS STAFF TRAINING (STT)
APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS STAFF TRAINING (STT) Ansökan Erasmus Personalfortbildning 2017-2019 Funds are granted continuously throughout the year until all available funds have been allocated. The application
More informationNC3Rs Studentship Scheme: Notes and FAQs
NC3Rs Studentship Scheme: Notes and FAQs 1. Competition overview The aim of the NC3Rs studentship scheme is to embed the 3Rs in the training of early career scientists from a broad range of research backgrounds.
More informationResource Pack for Erasmus Preparatory Visits
Resource Pack for Erasmus Preparatory Visits 2013 Page 1 of 8 General Overview - Preparatory Visits Objectives and description of the action Who can benefit Who can apply The main objective of the action
More informationEU PRIZE FOR WOMEN INNOVATORS Contest Rules
EU PRIZE FOR WOMEN INNOVATORS 2014 Contest Rules DEFINITIONS: Prizes under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) are awarded following a contest. The European Prize for Women Innovators 2013 is published
More informationTRANSNATIONAL YOUTH INITIATIVES 90
Part B Strategic partnerships in the field of education, training, and youth TRANSNATIONAL YOUTH INITIATIVES 90 These Strategic Partnerships in the field of youth aim to foster social commitment and entrepreneurial
More informationERASMUS+ Study Exchanges and Traineeships. Handbook for School/Departmental Exchange Co-ordinators
ERASMUS+ Study Exchanges and Traineeships Handbook for School/Departmental Exchange Co-ordinators March 2017 Version 5 Contents 1. Introduction 2. ERASMUS+ and the British Council Funding Cycle Operational
More information5.U.S. and European Museum Infrastructure Support Program
5.U.S. and European Museum Infrastructure Support Program Application Form: Q-MIS Section in charge:international Operations Section I & II, Arts and Culture Department Outline This grant Program is designed
More informationMEASURING R&D TAX INCENTIVES
General notes OECD time-series estimates of implied marginal R&D tax subidy rates (1 minus B-index) This is an experimental indicator based on quantitative and qualitative information representing a notional
More informationHvA Erasmus+ student handbook
HvA Erasmus+ student handbook 2016 2017 () Contents 1. Erasmus+ for students... 2 2. Conditions for participation in Erasmus+... 2 3. Procedures... 3 4. Grant amount... 5 5. Erasmus+ Online Linguistic
More informationExploiting International Life Science Opportunities. Dafydd Davies
Exploiting International Life Science Opportunities Dafydd Davies Enterprise Europe Network Wales Overview EC-managed business support network across 54 countries Local perspective: Helping Welsh SMEs
More informationRULES - Copernicus Masters 2017
RULES - Copernicus Masters 2017 ORGANISER OF THE COPERNICUS MASTERS The Copernicus Masters is organised under an ESA contract by Anwendungszentrum GmbH Oberpfaffenhofen ( the Organiser ) and is supported
More informationErasmus+ MedCulture Regional Workshop. International Dimension. Aref Alsoufi, Erasmus+ Lebanon. Beirut, 5 April Erasmus+
MedCulture Regional Workshop International Dimension Aref Alsoufi, Lebanon Beirut, 5 April 2016 Work together with European higher education institutions Come to study or teach in Europe What is? The EU's
More informationERASMUS+ current calls. By Dr. Saleh Shalaby
ERASMUS+ current calls By Dr. Saleh Shalaby Mobility of Learners and Staff EMJMD Erasmus+ Master Degree Loans Strategic Partnership Knowledge Alliance Sector Skills Alliances Capacity building IT Platforms
More informationErasmus+: Knowledge Alliances and Sector Skills Alliances. Infoday. 23 November María-Luisa García Mínguez, Renata Russell (EACEA) 1
Erasmus+: Knowledge Alliances and Sector Skills Alliances Infoday 23 November 2015 María-Luisa García Mínguez, Renata Russell (EACEA) 1 How to submit a proposal María Luisa G. Mínguez, Renata Russell Education,
More informationHealth Workforce Policies in OECD Countries
Health Workforce Policies in OECD Countries Right Jobs, Right Skills, Right Places Gaetan Lafortune, OECD Health Division EU Joint Action Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting Closure Event, Belgium,
More informationPress Conference - Lisbon, 24 February 2010
Press Conference - Lisbon, 24 February 2010 Karel Helsen, President, FTTH Council Europe Hartwig Tauber, Director General, FTTH Council Europe Erik Qualman, Author of Socialnomics Roland Montagne, Director
More informationThe Erasmus+ grants for academic year are allocated as follows:
Oulu, Aug 22, 2017 DEAR ERASMUS+ EXCHANGE STUDENT, Congratulations, you are accepted as an Erasmus exchange student on behalf of the University of Oulu! Below, you will find detailed information of what
More informationCALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR STATE SCHOLARSHIPS IN HUNGARY 2018/2019
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR STATE SCHOLARSHIPS IN HUNGARY 2018/2019 Call for applications for foreigners for Hungarian state scholarships to conduct research in the academic year 2018/2019 AIM OF THE SCHOLARSHIP
More informationMaking High Speed Broadband Available to Everyone in Finland
Making High Speed Broadband Available to Everyone in Finland Juha Parantainen Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finland 1 Broadband operators in Finland 2 Goals for Broadband Deployment set by
More informationInfo Session Webinar Joint Qualifications in Vocational Education and Training Call for proposals EACEA 27/ /10/2017
Info Session Webinar Joint Qualifications in Vocational Education and Training Call for proposals EACEA 27/2017 24/10/2017 How to use the webinar? Technical aspects Welcome to our webinar Configure your
More information2017 China- Europe Research and Innovation Tour
Beijing 24/10/2017-10:51 PRESS RELEASES 2017 China- Europe Research and Innovation Tour The 2017 China- Europe Research and Innovation Tour (Tour) is the 5 th edition of an ambitious awareness raising
More informationMobility project for VET learners and staff
Mobility project for VET learners and staff Organisations may apply for a VET learners and staff mobility projects in two ways: Any eligible organisation may apply for funding for Mobility projects for
More informationThe industrial competitiveness of Italian manufacturing
Milan, 27 January 2015 Where do we stand? Global perspectives on the Industrial Competitiveness of Italian manufacturing International Conference The industrial competitiveness of Italian manufacturing
More informationThe ERC funding strategy
The European Research Council ERC Grant Schemes FUNDING TOP RESEARCHERS http://erc.europa.eu The ERC funding strategy The European Research Council (ERC) is the first pan- European funding body designed
More informationESSM Research Grants T&C
European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM) Terms and Conditions for Research Grants A. INTRODUCTION 1) European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM) is a registered charity (charity registration number
More informationTHE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE
ANNEX 2 ANNUAL REPORTING TEMPLATE THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE ANNUAL REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 13(3) - EXPORTS AND IMPORTS OF CONVENTIONAL ARMS COVERED UNDER ARTICLE 2 (1) This provisional
More informationThe EUREKA Initiative. Matteo Fedeli EUREKA Secretariat
The EUREKA Initiative Matteo Fedeli EUREKA Secretariat EUREKA in General The future of EUREKA Focus on EUREKA Individual Projects Focus on the EUREKA Clusters Focus on EUREKA Umbrellas Focus on the Eurostars
More informationAdvance Notification of forthcoming Market Survey APMS
Acquisition Directorate graham.hindle@ncia.nato.int Telephone: +32 (0)2 707 8857 Fax: +32 (0)2 707 8770 15 February 2017 Advance Notification of forthcoming Market Survey APMS NCI Agency is providing advance
More informationRELAUNCHED CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR STATE SCHOLARSHIPS IN HUNGARY 2017/2018
RELAUNCHED CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR STATE SCHOLARSHIPS IN HUNGARY 2017/2018 Call for applications for foreigners for Hungarian state scholarships to conduct research ending before 31 May 2018 As of 27
More informationERC Grant Schemes. Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation
ERC Grant Schemes Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation The ERC funding strategy The European Research Council (ERC) is the first pan- European funding body designed to support
More informationOverview. Erasmus: Computing Science Stirling. What is Erasmus? What? 10/10/2012
Erasmus: Computing Science Stirling CompSci Coordinator: Ken Turner kjt@cs.stir.ac.uk University Coordinator: Sterling Yates erasmus@stir.ac.uk Overview What is the Erasmus Programme? Why should you participate?
More informationIntegrating mental health into primary health care across Europe
Integrating mental health into primary health care across Europe Social Breakthroughs Symposium Friday, 26th june BMAG Porto Authors Tiago Vieira Pinto Registered Nurse Serpa Pinto Family Health Unit Family
More informationTier 4 visa application guidance applying outside the UK (entry clearance)
Tier 4 visa application guidance applying outside the UK (entry clearance) 1 This document is intended to provide guidance to University of Cambridge students on completing a Tier 4 visa application from
More informationReport from the CMDh meeting held on November 2013
Report from the meeting held on 18-20 November 2013 Pharmacovigilance Outcomes of informal PSUR work-sharing procedures The has adopted the conclusions of PSUR assessment for alprostadil, ciclosporin,
More informationFOHNEU and THE E UR OPEAN DIME NS ION. NANTES FR ANC E 7-9 NOVEMB ER 2007 Julie S taun
FOHNEU and THE E UR OPEAN DIME NS ION NANTES FR ANC E 7-9 NOVEMB ER 2007 Julie S taun Member states Austria Belgium Cyprus Czech republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy
More informationLCC INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY INTERNAL RULES AND REGULATIONS ON THE INTERNATIONAL MOBILITY ACTIVITIES OF STUDENTS AND STAFF
APPROVED by the VP for Academics & the Director for Center for International Education LCC International University on August 1, 2017 LCC INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY INTERNAL RULES AND REGULATIONS ON THE
More informationStudy Overseas Short-term Mobility Program Scholarships
Template School of Medicine Study Overseas Short-term Mobility Program Scholarships Application Form SOSTMP Scholarship Application Form Electives & Internationalisation Program Level 2 MS 2 Hobart Tel.
More informationThis document is a preview generated by EVS
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION CEN ISO/TS 22367 January 2010 ICS 11.100.01 English Version Medical laboratories - Reduction of error through risk management and
More informationCountry Requirements for Employer Notification or Approval
Algeria Australia Austria Belgium Brazil For Product Training Meetings and Sponsorships to Third-Party Educational Events involving significant travel, government employed HCPs must seek approval from
More informationSkillsnet workshop. "Job vacancy Statistics"
EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate F: Social Statistics and Information Society Unit F-2: Labour market statistics Skillsnet workshop Bucarest, 21-22 June 2007 "Job vacancy Statistics" Eurostat contact:
More informationYoung scientist competition 2016
Young scientist competition The INDIGO young scientist competition gives young researchers from India and the EU the opportunity to promote their research projects and ideas for cooperation by introducing
More informationStudent exchange programs: Erasmus+, PIM, Bilateral agreements in a.y. 2017/2018
Student exchange programs: Erasmus+, PIM, Bilateral agreements in a.y. 2017/2018 1 What is exchange program??? 1 or 2 semester studies in partner university abroad Non degree mobility Recognition of courses
More informationGlobal Humanitarian Assistance. Emergency Response Funds (ERFs)
Global Humanitarian Assistance Emergency Response Funds (ERFs) Profile July 2011 Contents Overview... 1 Donors... 3 Governments... 4 Non-governments... 5 Recipients... 5 Kenya ERF In Focus... 7 Somalia
More informationCIVIL SOCIETY FUND. Grants for Civil Society Organisations PART 2
CIVIL SOCIETY FUND Grants for Civil Society Organisations PART 2 Managed by the Malta Council for the Voluntary Sector on behalf of the Parliamentary Secretariat, Ministry for Education and Employment
More informationErasmus + program the way towards the global mindset (from the partner countries perspectives)
Glomus Camp 2017 Nana Sharikadze, Tbilisi State Conservatoire (TSC) Erasmus + program the way towards the global mindset (from the partner countries perspectives) January 17, 2017 Natal, Brazil Who we
More informationArchimedes Distinctions for High-level Research Work
European Commission Community Research Information Package Information Brochure Call Specific Archimedes Distinctions for High-level Research Work Edition September 2001 Call identifier: IHP-ARP-01-1 http://www.cordis.lu/improving
More informationFOR EUPA USE ONLY ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME EN
FOR EUPA USE ONLY ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME EN Registration number: MT/15/E+/EVAL- Please fill the form in, print it out, sign it and send it to the EUPA by email, post, by private courier service or in person,
More informationImplementation Guideline of. DUO-Thailand Fellowship Programme
Implementation Guideline of 2019 DUO - Thailand Fellowship Programme General Information DUO - Thailand Fellowship Programme aims to enhance a balanced mobility of students between Thailand and 30 ASEM
More informationHEALTH WORKFORCE PRIORITIES IN OECD COUNTRIES (WITH A FOCUS ON GEOGRAPHIC MAL-DISTRIBUTION)
HEALTH WORKFORCE PRIORITIES IN OECD COUNTRIES (WITH A FOCUS ON GEOGRAPHIC MAL-DISTRIBUTION) Gaetan Lafortune Senior Economist, OECD Health Division International Health Workforce Collaborative Quebec City,
More informationEVC 2018 Statistics. EVC Participants: Geographical breakdown. EVC 2018 : 55 Countries (Total participants :1806)
EVC 2018 Statistics EVC Participants: Geographical breakdown 6,9% 1,4% 0,3% 0,1% 10,5% Europe 1459 Middle East 189 Asia/Pacific 124 USA 26 Africa 6 Oceania 2 80,8% EVC 2018 : 55 Countries (Total participants
More informationHospital Pharmacists making the difference in medication use
The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists EAHP the association for all hospital pharmacists in Europe Hospital Pharmacists making the difference in medication use www.eahp.eu 1 Introduction to EAHP
More informationCapacity Building in the field of Higher Education (CBHE)
Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (CBHE) 1 What information will you have at the end of the presentation? I. General Overview of CBHE II. The consortia and the financing rules III. Lesson
More informationQ Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report
Manpower Q3 211 Employment Outlook Survey Global A Manpower Research Report Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Global Contents Q3/11 Global Employment Outlook 1 International Comparisons Americas International
More informationSummary of the National Reports. of NATO Member and Partner Nations to the NATO Committee on Gender Perspectives
Summary of the National Reports of NATO Member and Partner Nations to the NATO Committee on Gender Perspectives 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..............................................................5
More informationInternational Recruitment Solutions. Company profile >
International Recruitment Solutions Company profile > 25.04.2018 1 SOLUTION FOR ALL YOUR INTERNATIONAL HIRING NEEDS Who we are: 1 powerful alliance of 50+ market leading job board companies Unparalleled
More informationLifelong Learning Programme
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Lifelong Learning : policies and programme Higher education; "Erasmus" Lifelong Learning Programme STATISTICAL OVERVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
More informationSpreading knowledge about Erasmus Mundus Programme and Erasmus Mundus National Structures activities among NARIC centers. Summary
Report on BRIDGE Project Action 2 EM NS Responsible: Estonia, Foundation Archimedes Authors: Anastassia Knor, Gunnar Vaht Spreading knowledge about Erasmus Mundus Programme and Erasmus Mundus National
More informationThe G200 Youth Forum 2015 has 4 main platforms which will run in tandem with each other:
Mr. Tong Shijun East China Normal University University Council Chairman 3663 Zhongshan Road (N.) 200062 Shanghai China Dear Mr. Tong Shijun, Geneva, 25 September 2014 The 10th G200 Youth Forum 2015 will
More informationA Platform for International Cooperation
EUREKA A Platform for International Cooperation Smart City Exhibition 2014 Job and Business in a Smart City Pedro de Sampaio Nunes Head of the EUREKA Secretariat Bologna, 22nd October 2014 Doing business
More informationReport on Exports of Military Goods from Canada
Report on Exports of Military Goods from Canada 2003-2005 Export Controls Division Export and Import Controls Bureau Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada Website: www.exportcontrols.gc.ca Her
More information