Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Preliminary End-of-Year Results. Media Briefing September 7, 2017

Transcription

1 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Preliminary End-of-Year Results Media Briefing September 7, 2017

2 CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward For the 4 th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in Mathematics and Math I. Compared to , College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in English II, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology. Similarly, Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) rates improved in Mathematics, English II, and Math I, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology compared to CMS outperformed the state average and most large districts in the state in College and Career Ready (CCR) rates. Seventy-three percent (73%) of schools in CMS met or exceeded growth expectations. 2

3 CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward Student performance on the ACT WorkKeys exam, a national measure of workplace readiness, improved and outpaced the state for the 5 th year in a row. CMS graduated 89.4% of the 2017 cohort of seniors in four years. CMS has a higher four-year cohort graduation rate than the state and most other large school districts in North Carolina. The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of A or A+ held steady at 25 schools. The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of F held steady at 5 schools. Nearly 74% of schools in CMS earned a school performance grade of A, B or C. 3

4 2017 Cohort Graduation Rate (4-Year) 4

5 2014 CMS 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate NC:

6 Graduation Rates for All Racial Subgroups 2010 to 2017 Change 2016 to 2017 Change White points points Asian points points Black points points Hispanic points points White Asian Black Hispanic Source: NCDPI Cohort Graduation Rate: Graduation Rate Calculation Method: 6

7 Graduation Gaps Have Narrowed Dramatically Since to 2017 Change 2016 to 2017 Change EDS points points SWD points points LEP points points SWD LEP EDS SWD: Students with Disabilities; LEP: Limited English Proficient; EDS: Economically Disadvantaged Students 7

8 CMS s Graduation Rate Exceeds Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 8

9 Math and Reading Grades 3-8 Science Grades 5 & 8 Math I, English II & Biology 9

10 The State Redefined Its Definition of Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) and College and Career Readiness (CCR) In , the State Board of Education adopted a new methodology for determining achievement levels of students. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Grade Level Proficiency College and Career Ready 10

11 CMS Proficiency Rates Are Rising in Nearly All Tested Subjects Percentage of students At or Above Grade Level Proficiency has increased from 2014 to 2017 in all subjects except English II and Biology Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points Reading 3-8 Math 5 & 8 Science Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points English II Math I Biology Levels 3, 4, & Levels 3, 4, & Levels 3, 4, & 5 11

12 College and Career Readiness Rates in End-of-Grade (EOG) Tested Subjects Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points Reading 3-8 Math 5 & 8 Science

13 College and Career Readiness Rates in End-of-Course (EOC) Tested Subjects Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points Change: 2014 to points English II Math I Biology

14 Percentage of Students Proficient in Reading Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from to Test CMS Percent Proficient CMS Percent Proficient Change from to Reading % 58.4% -0.1 points Reading % 57.3% -0.6 points Reading % 56.5% +1.0 points Reading % 60.2% +0.5 points Reading % 57.3% -3.1 points Reading % 53.2% -3.0 points Reading % 57.2% -0.8 points 14

15 Percentage of Students CCR In Reading Declined Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from to Test CMS Percent C & C Ready CMS Percent C & C Ready Change from to Reading % 46.5% -3.1 points Reading % 44.3% -2.3 points Reading % 43.7% -0.6 points Reading % 50.4% -0.8 points Reading % 48.8% -0.3 points Reading % 42.2% -2.6 points Reading % 45.9% -1.7 points 15

16 Percentage of Students Proficient in Math is Rising Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from to Test CMS Percent Proficient CMS Percent Proficient Change from to Test CMS Percent Proficient CMS Percent Proficient Change from to Math % 68.2% -0.3 pts. Math % 62.7% +0.6 pts. Math % 65.6% -0.2 pts. Science 5 Science % 72.2% -2.3pts. 73.0% 74.0% +1.0 pts. Math % 56.8% +1.4 pts. Math % 54.7% +1.3 pts. Science 5 & % 73.1% -0.7 pts. Math % 50.4% +0.9 pts. Math % 60.0% +0.6 pts. 16

17 Percentage of Students CCR in Math is Rising Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from to Test CMS Percent C & C Ready CMS Percent C & C Ready Change from to Test CMS Percent C & C Ready CMS Percent C & C Ready Change from to Math % 58.2 % +1.2 pts. Math % 55.6% -1.1 pts. Math % 60.1% -0.3 pts. Science 5 Science % 62.6% -3.5 pts. 64.6% 65.2% +0.6 pts. Math % 50.3% +1.3 pts. Math % 48.8% +1.5 pts. Science 5 & % 63.9% -1.5 pts. Math % 45.1% +0.9 pts. Math % 53.3% +0.6 pts. 17

18 Percentage of Students Proficient in English II and Math I is Rising Percentage of Students Grade Level Proficient (Achievement Levels 3, 4, and 5) from to Test CMS Percent Proficient CMS Percent Proficient Change from to English II 60.9% 63.8% +2.9 points Math I 66.0% 68.9% +2.9 points Biology 60.4% 56.3% -4.1 points EOC Composite 62.8% 63.6% +0.8 points 18

19 Percentage of Students CCR in English II and Math I is Rising Percentage of Students College and Career Ready (Achievement Levels 4 and 5) from to Test CMS Percent C & C Ready CMS Percent C & C Ready Change from to English II 52.7% 54.3% +1.6 points Math I 58.1% 60.2% +2.1 points Biology 52.4% 48.6% -3.8 points EOC Composite 54.8% 54.9% +0.1 points 19

20 CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina Overall Performance Composite Percent Grade Level Proficient (Levels 3, 4 and 5) by District and NC GLP Performance Composite NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 20

21 CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina Overall Performance Composite Percent College and Career Ready (Levels 4 and 5) by District and NC CCR Performance Composite NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 21

22 CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina Percent of Students Grade Level Proficient in Reading, Math and Science by District and NC 3-8 Reading GLP 3-8 Math GLP 5 & 8 Science GLP NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 22

23 CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina Percent of Students College & Career Ready on the Reading, Math and Science EOG Tests by District and NC 3-8 Reading CCR 3-8 Math CCR 5 & 8 Science CCR NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 23

24 CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina Percent of Students Grade Level Proficient on the English II, Math I, and Biology Exams by District and NC English II GLP Math I GLP Biology GLP NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 24

25 CMS Outperformed Most Other Large Districts in North Carolina Percent of Students College & Career Ready on the EOC Tests by District and NC English II CCR Math I CCR Biology CCR NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake NC CMS Durham Forsyth Guilford Wake 25

26 Schools Meeting or Exceeding Expected Growth: to

27 School Growth School Growth is an indication of the average rate at which students in a school learned over the past year. The standard is roughly equivalent to a year s worth of expected growth for a year of instruction. The growth measure is defined in one of three ways: did not meet expected growth; met expected growth; or exceeded expected growth. 27

28 Nearly Three Quarters of CMS Schools Met or Exceeded Growth Expectations Year District/ State Total Number of Schools # Meeting or Exceeding Growth % Meeting or Exceeding Growth CMS % CMS % CMS % CMS % CMS % NC 2,531 1, % Note: In , six schools did not have growth data, as provided by EVAAS/NC (Cato Middle College High, Harper Middle College High, Levine Middle College High, Metro School, Lincoln Heights and Turning Point Academy) and are not included in the denominator. 28

29 School Performance Grades: to

30 School Performance Grades Effective in the school year, North Carolina assigned School Performance Grades to all public schools. The School Performance Grades are based on student achievement (80%) and growth (20%). The indicators and the proficiency standard or benchmark used for achievement include: 1. Annual End-of-Grade (EOG) mathematics and reading assessments in grades 3 8 and science assessments in grades 5 and 8 (Level 3 and above) 2. Annual End-of-Course (EOC) assessments in Math I, Biology, and English II (Level 3 and above) 3. The percentage of graduates who complete Math III, Algebra II, or Integrated Math III with a passing grade 4. The percentage of grade 11 students who achieve the minimum score required for admission into a constituent institution of The University of North Carolina on the ACT (composite score of 17) 5. The percentage of graduates identified as Career and Technical Education concentrators who meet the Silver Certificate or higher on the ACT WorkKeys assessment 6. The percentage of students who graduate within four years of entering high school (Standard [4-Year] Cohort Graduation Rate) The EVAAS model, which provides the growth measure, uses current and previous student test data to determine whether schools are maintaining or increasing student achievement from one year to the next. In the event that a school does not have a Growth Score, only the School Achievement Score is used to calculate the Performance Score. It is important to note that schools that have met or exceeded growth may still receive a low School Performance Grade since achievement accounts for 80% of the grade. For through , the grade designations are set on a 15-point scale: 30

31 Number of Schools with an A/A+ at 25 (15%) for the 2 nd Year 25 schools received a SPG of an A or A+ in and compared to 19 schools in The number of schools receiving an F grade decreased from 10 in to 5 in and remained the same in Year A+ N/(%) A N/(%) B N/(%) C N/(%) D N/(%) F N/(%) Total (5%) 17 (11%) 11 (7%) 47 (30%) 46 (29%) Schools Performance Grades 50 (31%) 44 (28%) 36 (23%) 37 (23%) 11 (7%) 10 (6%) (8%) 11 (7%) 42 (25%) 61 (37%) 32 (19%) 5 (3%) * (9%) 10 (6%) 40 (24%) 58 (35%) 39 (23%) 5 (3%) 167 *In , the state introduced A+ grades. Schools that earn an A designation and do not have significant achievement and/or graduation gaps will be designated as an A+ school. Significant achievement and graduation gaps are defined as in-school gaps that are above the three-year state average when averaging gaps in the previous year and at least one of the two prior years between the highest-achieving subgroup and lowest-achieving subgroup. In , 15 schools were designated as A+ schools. These schools are Bain ES, Beverly Woods ES, Dilworth ES, Elon Park ES, Polo Ridge ES, Hawk Ridge ES, Huntersville ES, Ballantyne ES, McKee Road ES, Olde Providence ES, Piedmont IB MS, Providence Spring ES, Providence HS, South Charlotte MS, and Grand Oak ES. 31

32 School Performance Grade Changes SPG IMPROVEMENT FROM TO Improved since Maintained since Declined since A+ A B C D F Note: There are five schools that are not included in this chart because they did not have a School Performance Grade in one or both years because they use an alternate accountability model or because they were new schools in or

33 ACT and WorkKeys Exam Performance

34 ACT Performance Overview Juniors North Carolina is one of over 20 states to require all 11 th grade students to take the ACT English Average Score (Change from 2016) Math Average Score (Change from 2016) Reading Average Score (Change from 2016) Science Average Score (Change from 2016) Composite Average Score (Change from 2016) CMS 17.2 (-.2) 19.2 (-.2) 18.9 (-.5) 18.6 (-.3) 18.6 (-.3) State 17.4 (+.3) 18.9 (0) 18.9 (-.1) 18.8 (-.1) 18.6 (0) 2017 Grade 11 ACT results as reported by ACT. 34

35 ACT Performance Overview Graduating Seniors 2017 English Average Score (Change from 2016) Math Average Score (Change from 2016) Reading Average Score (Change from 2016) Science Average Score (Change from 2016) Composite Average Score (Change from 2016) CMS 17.8 (+.2) 19.6 (+.2) 19.7 (+.5) 19.2 (+.2) 19.2 (+.3) State 17.8 (0) 19.3 (-.1) 19.6 (+.1) 19.3 (+.1) 19.1 (0) 2017 Graduating Seniors results as reported by ACT. 35

36 CMS Improved Performance on ACT WorkKeys Exam for the 5 th Straight Year Attainment of a Silver Certificate or Better is an Indicator of Career and Workplace Readiness ACT WorkKeys Performance Senior CTE Concentrators Percent of Senior CTE Concentrators with a Silver Certificate or Better CMS 68.9% 73.7% 73.9% 76.1% 77.0% State 67.3% 67.6% 72.1% 73.5% 73.3% 36 Sources:

37 CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward For the 4 th year in a row, College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in Mathematics and Math I. Compared to , College and Career Ready (CCR) rates improved in English II, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology. Similarly, Grade Level Proficiency (GLP) rates improved in Mathematics, English II, and Math I, but declined in Reading, Science, and Biology compared to CMS outperformed the state average and most large districts in the state in College and Career Ready (CCR) rates. Seventy-three percent (73%) of schools in CMS met or exceeded growth expectations. 37

38 CMS is Continuing to Make Strides Forward Student performance on the ACT WorkKeys exam, a national measure of workplace readiness, improved and outpaced the state for the 5 th year in a row. CMS graduated 89.4% of the 2017 cohort of seniors in four years. CMS has a higher four-year cohort graduation rate than the state and most other large school districts in North Carolina. The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of A or A+ held steady at 25 schools. The number of schools in CMS receiving a school performance grade of F held steady at 5 schools. Nearly 74% of schools in CMS earned a school performance grade of A, B or C. 38

39 Moving Forward School Improvement Plans Build upon the strategies and successes of schools and staff within CMS Secondary teacher-leader cadre Focus on foundational literacy skills: Reading Foundations professional development/application expansion NC Pre-K Expansion North Star Reading Partners, starting at 2 nd Grade Cross subject/content integration Partner Community Efforts Integration of all content areas with literacy Instructional Leadership Team process fidelity with a focus on writing 39

40 Moving Forward Preparation of staff and students in response to K-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics standards shifts for the school year Embedding social-emotional learning and cultural proficiency strategies/resources within the English Language Arts curriculum Specially designed curriculum for English Learners. Continued support for rigorous lesson planning through Instructional Planning Approach Instructional Coaching support by Learning Community staff 40

41 41